Who doesn't love Jerome Armstrong? Before he was a controversial political consultant; before he was a co-author, with Markos Moulitsas Zuniga, of "Crashing The Gate", in which he heralded the rise of the "Netroots"; and before he was barred from the securities industry by the SEC for his role in some penny-ante stock hustling, he was - I wish I had the nerve and imagination to make this up - an astrologer.
I am not kidding. And neither was he - here is a flavor of his analysis of the then-impending 2002 election, as brought to us by the Providence Journal:
MyDD, a liberal political blog that's heavy on polls and polling, doesn't link its affiliated Astroworld political astrology index from the homepage, but this offers its own sorts of odds.
Astrologers there are analyzing the cosmic weather, using a symbolic language, and looking at indicators: Who's moving to another house, who's under a heavy Saturn transit, who's a winner whose precise time has come. Nancy Luber Sommers is looking for periods of elation in the charts of the candidate and leaders of both parties in the next few days and beyond, especially to January. She has on on her own site a chart of predictions in major races based on what she sees in the candidates' charts.
Does this work? No idea. Come back tomorrow.
We might have a surprise.
That's what astrologer Jerome Armstrong says we'll see today, a surprise that's been brewing below the radar: that women voters will pour out to the polls today, while men will be inclined to stay home, for reasons only an astrologer might understand (so I've edited them out here):
Bush and the rulers (in) power could be pierced by something that seems trivial in (its) simplicity, that triggers larger events to occur. Simply put, men will not turn out to vote in near the numbers that women will this election....
Ceres and Venus are representative of younger, and especially feminine energies in the mundane election analysis;... they are holding a secret, their voice has seem(ed) stifled, and their vote will be a secret from Bush & the media...
No one knows how big the vote is, until after it happens, surprising the media, and shifting control of Congress.
It’s an angry vote. The dissatisfaction with the economy is there; but the Sun-Moon’s conjunction in the 7th, where the Rx Venus/Mercury conjunction is also, points towards the threat of war as a strong motivation.
For the full analysis, try this Google-cache of a post by "Jerome" with text that matches the Pro-Jo excerpt. It's pretty heavy stuff.
So one of the leaders of the "reality-based community" is an astrologer - who knew?
Actually, Dan Riehl, RedState and Wizbang knew before I did, and they have plenty of coverage. But what they don't have is Saturday night karaoke - I want all you unreconstructed 60's flower children to put your hands together and join in. I know you know the song:
When the moon is in the seventh house
And MyDD aligns with Kos
Then Mark Warner will be the nominee
And love will steer the stars
Everybody!
This is the dawning of the Age of the Daily Kos
The Age of the Daily Kos
The Daily Kos!
The Daily Kos!
OK, that was a beautiful moment but I have to serious up - these folks might actually anoint our next President. Ooops, now I'm laughing again...
BUT SERIOUSLY: Follow the money. Or, less seriously, learn why Mark Warner won in 2001. Here are lots of links from Glenn, and good background from the National Journal. Golly, those Kos Kidz sure do know how to kill a story, don't they?
ADMIRABLE RESTRAINT: From a disgruntled lefty:
I am feeling a powerful urge to bring up the obvious Democrat's retort here, but I am going to stay strong and Just Say No to that temptation.
UPDATE: Let's hear from Astrologer Jerome:
Another Update [2006-6-25 14:13:39 by Jerome Armstrong]: Oh yea, on the astrological stuff. I have done the new age type things over the years—life’s never boring that way. Down that line, I dabbled with planets and predictions in the most abstract manner, as one of several different predictive mathematical disciplines, when coming out of finances and into politics during my early blogging days (nobody is surprised that remembers the early 2001 days here), and since then have completely tapered out of it over time. So yea, the cons got me on this one being a little out of the ordinary… It has nothing to do with what I consult with in online political strategy. But hey, like JP Morgan once said, “millionaires don’t use astrology, billionaires do!” I hope to see those wingnuts that are obsessed with every little thing I do at the next bikram yoga or vipassana meditation session in DC-- but fair warning that I believe we evolved from monkeys!

BRAVO!!
Posted by: clarice | June 24, 2006 at 09:32 PM
Astrologers fleece suckers.
Stock hustlers fleece suckers.
Hey! Wait a minute - you're not implying that the Kossacks are a bunch of.. Nah, you couldn't be. Obviously Jerome has turned over a new leaf and involved himself in politics due to heartfelt convictions - just like Kos himself.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | June 24, 2006 at 09:42 PM
If you guys drive Kos and Armstrong out of politics, I'll never forgive you.
Posted by: clarice | June 24, 2006 at 09:44 PM
TM - you gotta put a "put down your drinks" warning at the top of posts like this!! (now, where is my dry keyboard)
Posted by: Bill in AZ | June 24, 2006 at 09:47 PM
It's the NYT driving a stiletto between Kos's ribs. They want the nutroots off the porch as quickly as possible.
Besides, there is an 80% probability that the replacements will be nuttier than Kos.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | June 24, 2006 at 09:56 PM
When the moon is in the 7th house and Jupiter aligns with Mars, then peace will guide the planet and love will rulle the stars...
But Cleo could have told you all of this too. He has a direct line to the psychic hotline.
Posted by: Gary Maxwell | June 24, 2006 at 09:59 PM
Riehl says Brooks has an anti-Kos piece in the NYT ...I prefer the nutroots we know guys.
Posted by: clarice | June 24, 2006 at 10:02 PM
I wholeheartedly acknowledge that this is extremely embarrassing for Armstrong, and my opinion of him has indeed plummeted further.
I am feeling a powerful urge to bring up the obvious Democrat's retort here, but I am going to stay strong and Just Say No to that temptation.
Posted by: Foo Bar | June 24, 2006 at 10:08 PM
Over $1.1B was spent on the '02 cycle. About $500M has been spent so far on this cycle, which means that there is over $500M yet to be spent.
Could the Times be missing out on its cut? Is this a gentle hit to Dean as to how easy it is for the Times to cut a throat?
Posted by: Rick Ballard | June 24, 2006 at 10:09 PM
You mean Armstrong wasted his time back-editing all the astronomy references off his site?
Posted by: richard mcenroe | June 24, 2006 at 10:18 PM
Correction - those were totals for both parties - the Dems will spend another $240M - if they can raise another $150M or so.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | June 24, 2006 at 10:21 PM
Rick, let's dust off those old Che shirts..It's time for new leaders to grab the banners (and the gelt)..
Posted by: clarice | June 24, 2006 at 10:28 PM
Well I'm a Pisces; that must count for something!
Posted by: Jane | June 24, 2006 at 10:30 PM
You suggesting there's a new way to use the old line"What's your sign?" LOL
Posted by: clarice | June 24, 2006 at 10:36 PM
Tom, Bravo!
Encore, encore!
I add to your post two things. One is a direct link to the Projo entry, rather than using the Google cache.
And two is a link to the original MyDD post that Projo linked. It has been cleansed from MyDD, but the Wayback Machine had it.
It is a riot.
Posted by: Gerry | June 24, 2006 at 10:39 PM
Hmm...
The Aquarian Culture
New Hope For A Progressive Future
[that way I can use the regular TAC logo stationary]
Hmm.. they're suckers and they're stupid but how big a sucker (the 'how stupid' I've got a handle on)? Damn, don't want to shoot too low....
Posted by: Rick Ballard | June 24, 2006 at 10:42 PM
It's hard to pick a fav , Gerry, but I really like this:
"I may be totally off on this whole thread of analysis though, just maybe. The aspects of trine from Jupiter to Pluto, and from Saturn to Uranus, are what the media says the debate is about, with a split decision. But these are trines, and trines usually don't protend toward making the tough choices, and this election is a stark choice. So a lot of people will look at the election in terms of these trines, and decide to sit it out; but some will feel this deeper unsettled energy, and will make the effort to vote for a change."
Posted by: clarice | June 24, 2006 at 10:42 PM
Rick, Maybe we can throw in a chatchke for those who sign up early..But I like the idea of recycling the TAC logo..Good thinking.
Posted by: clarice | June 24, 2006 at 10:45 PM
Bravo! Bravissima!
Maguire, you've outdone yourself....once again ::chuckle::
Another game of telephone successfully engineered by the host, all to the applause
of the unionized musicians who manage to hit all the correct notes.
Where were you this morning Maguire?
Mom wouldn't let you out of the basement to
go outside and play?
Posted by: Semanticleo | June 24, 2006 at 10:48 PM
The vowel ending an Italian superlative indicates the gender of the noun to which it refers. Almost any idiot would know that.
But then you're very special, aren't you?
Posted by: Rick Ballard | June 24, 2006 at 10:53 PM
Here's another from the Mark Warner race:
http://acepilots.com/mt/2006/06/24/hilarious-uncut-from-the-nutroots-own-astrologer/
Posted by: clarice | June 24, 2006 at 11:10 PM
Breaking News: The Warner Campaign will announce within 24 business hours that they are letting Armstrong go and bringing in noted Satanist Anton La Vey as a campaign coordinator...
Posted by: richard mcenroe | June 24, 2006 at 11:46 PM
Now, you're just "trine-ing" us, aren't you, RM.
Posted by: clarice | June 24, 2006 at 11:50 PM
Take a look at the Raw Story Brooks piece - he added a link to a quick, dare I say, Gipper-like response from kos. Only he forgot to add that their success depends on his "sign."
Posted by: Dan Riehl | June 24, 2006 at 11:53 PM
We've had Kos' Grapes of Wrath speech, how many business days (hours?) until we get his I shall return speech?
Posted by: clarice | June 25, 2006 at 12:04 AM
Through The New Republic and the NY Times (spit!), Hillary has just knee-capped Mark Warner.
I think you guys and gals should just leave Jerome and Kos alone.
Posted by: danking70 | June 25, 2006 at 12:05 AM
I think so, too, danking, but TM and RB and RM made me do keep picking on Kos. It's their fault.
Posted by: clarice | June 25, 2006 at 12:09 AM
Nice to know I've got such pleasant company.
But I am also looking forward to all the Joe-mentum sending Kos to 0-22.
Posted by: danking70 | June 25, 2006 at 12:24 AM
Actually, I want Hillary to kneecap Warner. Nice looking successful Southern governer who doesn't have the baggage of having to vote on any war resolutions--therefore can pick any position the wind blows in. He is their imaginary, mainstream, grassroots candidate. Sheesh. He might actually win.
The more inter-family bloodletting the better.
And cause Hillary has just blown it for Warner, and made Kos and his backers look stoopid and corrupt, they will continue to be very very unhappy with her.
Posted by: verner | June 25, 2006 at 12:27 AM
OT: The Iraqi insurgents rejected the amnesty plan.
Posted by: lurker | June 25, 2006 at 12:46 AM
And OT: Michelle Malkin, LGF, and CQ noticed that NYT leaked another classified story - about the troops reductions.
Posted by: lurker | June 25, 2006 at 12:53 AM
...but I am going to stay strong and Just Say No to that temptation.
But I am going to Just Say Yes to stealing that.
Could the Times be missing out on its cut? Is this a gentle hit to Dean as to how easy it is for the Times to cut a throat?
Geez, if the Times can take down major intel programs, you would think they could take down a couple of bloggers.
Posted by: Tom Maguire | June 25, 2006 at 12:56 AM
wow....TM targets Townhouse with a MIRV warhead
Posted by: windansea | June 25, 2006 at 12:56 AM
lurker, mac thinks that was a fake leak..I think so, too..and the NYT story seems quite devoid of any new facts.
Perhaps instead of yanking their credentials or banning fed employees in security slots from speaking to NYTs' reporters, the Administration has hit on a new plan--embarrass them by feeding them nonstop crap.
Posted by: clarice | June 25, 2006 at 01:06 AM
Sign check
Sagittarius
I know Clarice is too
Posted by: topsecretk9 | June 25, 2006 at 01:08 AM
Boy, Neptune must be aligned with Mercury or something, because I too am a Sagittarius, as is my wife.
March must be a very good month!
Posted by: Gerry | June 25, 2006 at 01:10 AM
I am almost without words.
But Armstrong is like a carnival splash-clown.
Posted by: Chants | June 25, 2006 at 01:10 AM
TM targets Townhouse with a MIRV warhead
Scorpio.
Posted by: Tom Maguire | June 25, 2006 at 01:10 AM
triple Scorpio rising here...but my dark side is hidden by a sunny Taurus disposition
good work dude!!
Posted by: windansea | June 25, 2006 at 01:19 AM
Chants You'd think with his special talent for reading the stars he'd have seen this coming..........
Posted by: clarice | June 25, 2006 at 01:19 AM
I think this has legs...Warner is toast by association
the kossacks will implode and splinter into the irrelevance they deserve
PIAPS will be defeated by a ham sandwich named Rudy....
Posted by: windansea | June 25, 2006 at 01:30 AM
that will be fun...the adulterer vs the adulterated
the vote will be determined by the silent majority of the happily married
Posted by: windansea | June 25, 2006 at 01:33 AM
I don't know if this Armstrong thing has legs, or even if it deserves legs.
But it is hella funny, and TM just beat the crap out of him.
Posted by: Chants | June 25, 2006 at 01:40 AM
Depends on what you mean by "has legs." Will it become a big story? No.
But Armstrong is done as a player, and rightfully so. At worst he is a total scam artist. At best, he is the embodyment of the charicatures the left made of Nancy Reagan. And he isn't just a bride, he's a paid consultant for Presidential candidates.
Kos likely won't be impacted, unless he goes to the mat for his friend. Of course, if there was a sweetheart deal going on where there was some pay-for-touting, then Kos just had a planned source of future income evaporate. That is, unless the grassroots left is really that big of a collective sucker. I believe they are so-wrong on politics, but I also believe that most do not like being scammed, so I have faith.
Posted by: Gerry | June 25, 2006 at 01:47 AM
Well, the koslambs seem to be unshaken in their faith in their non-leader.Great!
Niters.
Posted by: clarice | June 25, 2006 at 02:00 AM
but I also believe that most do not like being scammed, so I have faith
considering this diary at kos I would calculate that 75% of the kossacks are still BDS infected and thus incapable of realizing they are being scammed...I'd feel sorry for them if my my triple scorpio rising was in retrograde...
Posted by: windansea | June 25, 2006 at 02:29 AM
my brain huuuurts By: streiff
And, if you want to see the significance of Varuna at work in the mundane world. Look at it's connections with George Bush, 9/11, and the Republican chart, in event, transit, and progression. Look at Varuna with Kennedy's assassination-- this is a paradigm tipping-point energy at work. Varuna is a body that is on the same 'energetic' playing field as Pluto. Awakening this supra-unconciousness of the trans-Neptunians as their own group, instead of just co-opting Pluto from the bunch and calling it a day, is gonna take some work; but hey, that's where the enlightenment resides.
Jerome Armstrong, author, strategist, shill, and advisor to presidential hopeful Mark Warner.
Posted by: windansea | June 25, 2006 at 02:40 AM
On the new "leak" from the NYT -- this does not seem logical to me at all. General Casey and Donald Rumsfield held a press briefing on 22 June 2006, just two days ago. In that briefing, they gave broad numbers in terms of battalions, brigades and divisions. They talked about the Iraqis being up to 75% by the end of the year, etc. Is the Times saying that right after that they held some super secret meeting in which they came up with some troop draw down plan. It doesn't wash. Read the transcript of the briefing and see if you don't think the Times is talking about the very same things and trying to make it sound like a leak.
Pam the Reporter asks:
Reporter Jim asks:
Posted by: Sara (The Squiggler) | June 25, 2006 at 02:54 AM
the song is so clever. a real charm. so i guess that kos is an astrologist too?
i'd say more but i feel my iq dropping just being at this blog.
Posted by: me | June 25, 2006 at 03:21 AM
I prefer Armstong's that walk on the moon over Armtrong's that bark at the moon. But that's just me.
Posted by: Daddy | June 25, 2006 at 04:07 AM