Check This!


Google Ad


Memeorandum


Powered by TypePad

House Control / TradeSports

« Post-It Open Thread | Main | Global Warning Solved! (But Don't Hold Your Breath Waiting To See This Implemented) »

March 01, 2007

OK, New Thread And The Next Big Thing

Carbon offsets?  How about cigarette offsets - every pack you smoke funds a smoking reduction program statistically demonstrated to persuade one smoker to quit.

Obviously this is a complement to the existing cigarette taxes meant to pay for smoker's ed, and obviously Barack Obama will like this idea.  And every Hollywood mogul ought to like cigarette offsets specifically, or "sin offsets" generally.  Indulgences, 21st century style.

OK, on to the Libby case...

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b2aa69e200d834691d0169e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference OK, New Thread And The Next Big Thing:

» Expanding The Carbon Offset Business from Funmurphys: the Blog
While waiting for the Libby Trial jury to come back with a verdict (my mind's made up, what's taking them so long?), Tom Maguire has been forced to write, ever so briefly, about other things, like cigarette offsets. Not being... [Read More]

Comments

Funny you should mention cigarette offsets, our British representative, Mr. PUK, should have a proposal which will interest you in a few minutes--He's on the phone to our Nigerian banker at the moment.


I suppose you know that AlGore owns a company that deals in Carbon offsets?

I think I should start one. What a crock. The ultimate Panzi scheme, looks to me like.

Is that a banker from Niger or Nigeria?

Nigeria. But if it's Niger you want, our representative Mr. Odala PUK, in Niamey is busy trading yellowcake offsets. I can take a message for him.

Yes indeed,You buy you cigarettes in the normal way,but never take delivery of the,our third world offsetter will be smoking them for you.This is how Clarice was perfectly content in court,she was safe in the knowledge her cigarettes were being smoked in an low carbon environment.

They're rebroadcasting John Bolton on CSPAN2 right now.

DO NOT BE TAKEN IN BY THOSE OTHER CARBON OFFSET SCAMS!

You need Chants' AMWAY Approved Multi-Level Marketing Carbon Offset Scam!

Chants. The Scam you can trust.

Marlboros are 2 bucks a pack here in old Mexico...can I be of assistance? We could have the smokes bought at US prices but then ship them from Mexico for offset smoking in low carbon locations

warehouse space is cheap too

With a heavy heart, I am withdrawing predictions #11 and 11A.

Pofarmer

He really has ownership in one? Yes, it is indeed a Ponzi-Scheme!

I am for the Cigarette off-sets for Restaurants and Bars! Also, Trans-fat Off-sets!

Cig offsets for airplanes!!

Other Tom!

Say it isn't so!!

(What were predictions 11 and 11A again?)

Heh. I boldly predict Offsets will shortly replace - Is, is.

How would you do illicit sex offsets? Castration? Long term lesbian relationships?

I think the carbon credit bubble already burst.

Yesterday I saw a sad lady with a sidewalk table stand selling Blublocker sunglasses, Herbalife, and carbon credits.

Mrs. Clinton's campaign has announced that Mr. Clinton, a.k.a. B.J. did not rape, molest, or harrass anybody because had purchaed sexual offsets. Juanitta Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and Monica Lewinsky could not be reached for comments.

http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=221450
Bristol academics claim Branson prize.

I beat those Bristol academics to the punch in a thread here this week when I said we should make the militant greens quit exhaling CO2.

Charlie--I'll see you UTube and raise you--this one is amazing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTKJiP_bdbE

For a reasonable retainer fee we could sue them,Larry.

Wouldn't that be a conflict of interest, Clarice? I mean what with S C A M and all......

From the article:
The solution, published online by The Journal of Unlikely Science, is remarkably simple, requiring no technological wizardry or financial investment. It is quite simply, stop breathing; or at least breathe less.

Me too!!!

vnjagvet: Breathlessly waiting.

Posted by: vnjagvet | February 28, 2007 at 06:27 AM

Good! Less carbon dioxide.

Posted by: hit and run | February 28, 2007 at 06:32 AM


...

Other Tom:
Now I'm gonna shut up until


Yes!!! More less carbon dioxide!

WE can do it people!

Posted by: hit and run | February 28, 2007 at 06:34 AM

I am certain my clinet--that is YOU--will gladly waive that in the full knwoeldge that my loyalty would never be divided..

Okay, that is pretty cool....

I heard Rachmaninov play on the radio this morning. They've made new recordings from his player-piano rolls.

Clarice: The dancers were wonderful!

Isn't that amazing! How do they ever memorize the routine?

Did you get any details, Ralph?

We had the Rachmaninoff piano rolls when I was a very young kid. That man was some kind of freak.

Try WCPE.org You can order the CDs they play and listen to the broadcast online. It's a listener-supported station, no tax money involved.

You're in NC, Ralph?

I used to listen to WCPE all the time.

the highest Intrade bid on Libby being found guilty of at least one count is way down to 54.0...offers still at 75.0..last trade was 70.0

I didn't have any trouble with the big chords in that Prelude. It was the fast parts I couldn't do at all well. I'd like to see the rest of their show.

Yes, but unfortunately reception is poor in my neighborhood. They have a huge antenna now; I heard them in Danville VA on Monday.

I think prediction 11A was "hung on all counts for which they have not been unanimous for acquittal." I have a hard time squaring the descriptions of their group demeanor today with any disagreements. I have to say that it turns my stomach a bit that people would behave in this manner--the T-shirts, the levity, the early Friday recess--with so much at stake for the guy they're deliberating about.

I don't think they've even begun voting yet, OT

"I have to say that it turns my stomach a
bit that people would behave in
this manner--the T-shirts, the levity, the early Friday recess."
.
So far the jury seems to be getting a free pass on their ultimate duty.

What's the sentiment about blaming the jury if they get it wrong?

This is a reasonable description of the "facilitator" technique of group decision making..

Some aspects are not suitable for juries (i.e. "brainstorming") but you'll get the idea of what I THINK they are oing:

Facilitator

I do not recall all the background of the jury but it sounds to me as one of them has this background and is using this method.

I'm glad that you're on this, Tom. Otherwise, I might have to read stuff like this about this case:

http://guntotingliberal.com/archives/860

And that would make my brain hurt.

Clarice

So what are the consequences of the Facilitator technique for this trial?

It doesn't dictate results, but because it helps people focus it tends to lead to more rational results --and much less acrimony--getting there.

It doesn't make sense to trade one pack of cigarettes for one third world person quitting. After all, the carbon offsets don't work that way.

Instead, you have a company bribing the Uganda government to create national parks and evict the long time residents in order to plant trees there. And then you take the 99 year benefits of the trees (ignoring any methane production, of course) w/o paying for the maintainence of the trees as your carbon offset.

Planting trees in India was almost as good, as they forgot to provide the water needed to keep them growing. That agin was because they took the credits based on 99 years of benefits, but didn't fund the maintainence.

Or, you provide the poor in South Africa with compact flourescent bulbs, and make them travel 50 miles to pick them up.

Part of the problem here, which is why you need to have your non-smoking programs somewhere in the Third World, preferably in Africa or Asia, is that the geographic separation almost totally disengages the markets. Thus, in the case of Gore's power bills, he helps drive the demand side in Tenn., while the supply side is being manipulated in South Africa, resulting in more, high carbon, power being generated here, and less power being generated there.

It is bad enough moving power across this country, given the inevitable loss. But it is impossible right now to move it from South Africa here.

So, the nice thing about a non-smoking program in Africa is that it doesn't affect air quality here.

Wow! That does sound like it - even the shirts and silliness.

I'd sell you guys some fuckhead credits, but I don't have any to spare.


"It doesn't dictate results, but because it helps people focus it tends to lead to more rational results --and much less acrimony--getting there"

Well I am for acrimony if it gets us a hung jury rather than a conviction..but if it gets us an acquittal then I am for rational results.


"It doesn't dictate results, but because it helps people focus it tends to lead to more
rational results --and much less acrimony--getting there."
But what if the jury is irrational and renders a guilty verdict?

That's very encouraging, Clarice. If God came down right now (or sent a delegate) and announced that they haven't taken any votes yet, I would be elated. I hope you're correct.

On another delightful note, I see that Gore and two lackeys were waived through the screening process at an airport, until a security employee objected and they had to be screened like everyone else. Put this together with the $20,000 annual electrical bill and you might get the notion that this guy thinks the rules he wants to apply to others don't apply to him. That couldn't be it, could it?

Anybody remember how many felony convictions Ken Starr got? For some reason I think it was eighteen, and of course he was indirectly responsible for Clinton getting fined $90,000 by a federal judge for lying to him, and being disbarred and impeached. Now THERE was was a special prosecutor, by God.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Amazon






Traffic

Wilson/Plame