The NY Times Week In Review front-pages an article so mathematically misdirected that it is laugh-out-loud funny for anyone with an understanding of basic statistics, a group which apparently includes no Times editors. Fortunately, the article includes mad sex pairings, a high school prom, and a mortified professor, so you know it is hot. Here we go:
The Myth, the Math, the Sex
EVERYONE knows men are promiscuous by nature. It’s part of the genetic strategy that evolved to help men spread their genes far and wide. The strategy is different for a woman, who has to go through so much just to have a baby and then nurture it. She is genetically programmed to want just one man who will stick with her and help raise their children.
Surveys bear this out. In study after study and in country after country, men report more, often many more, sexual partners than women.
One survey, recently reported by the federal government, concluded that men had a median of seven female sex partners. Women had a median of four male sex partners. Another study, by British researchers, stated that men had 12.7 heterosexual partners in their lifetimes and women had 6.5.
So far, so good, but here comes the curve ball:
But there is just one problem, mathematicians say. It is logically impossible for heterosexual men to have more partners on average than heterosexual women. Those survey results cannot be correct.
It is about time for mathematicians to set the record straight, said David Gale, an emeritus professor of mathematics at the University of California, Berkeley.
“Surveys and studies to the contrary notwithstanding, the conclusion that men have substantially more sex partners than women is not and cannot be true for purely logical reasons,” Dr. Gale said.
Oh My Goodness - is this professor emeritus really unfamiliar with the difference between "mean" and "median"? I assume not, and yet... the Times lead clearly referred to partners of the "median" man and woman.
Well, let's see his reasoning:
He even provided a proof, writing in an e-mail message:
“By way of dramatization, we change the context slightly and will prove what will be called the High School Prom Theorem. We suppose that on the day after the prom, each girl is asked to give the number of boys she danced with. These numbers are then added up giving a number G. The same information is then obtained from the boys, giving a number B.
Theorem: G=B
Proof: Both G and B are equal to C, the number of couples who danced together at the prom. Q.E.D.”
For heaven's sake - I will grant that *if* the reporting by men and women is accurate then the means must be equal. However, one reason for using medians rather than means is to mute the behavior of the, hmm, possibly misbehaving tails. Of the distribution. Since this is apparently not obvious to Times editors, let me illustrate by returning to the prom.
Suppose 100 young men and woman attend the prom. Ninety of the young ladies choose to dance only with their dates; ten dancing femmes set out to dance with every guy in attendance, and succeed (Guys are soooo easy. Who knew?).
So how does the reporting go at the end of the evening? Ninety young men report eleven dance partners - the ten Dancing Femmes plus their date. Ten guys have a mere ten partners, since their original date was one of the Dancing Femmes. From the guys we get total partners equal to (90*11 + 10*10), which equals 1,090 partners. *Averaged* over the one hundred guys, that is 10.9 partners per guy, with a *median* number of partners equal to eleven.
And how about the ladies? Ninety of them report just one partner, their date. Ten of them report one hundred partners. Total partners from the ladies' ledger is (90*1 + 10*100), which also equals 1,090. That produces a mean of 10.9 partners per lady, but the median number of partners is only 1.
The median is different from the mean because the median effectively ignored the behavior of the small group of mad dancers. How about that? Or should I say, Q.E.D?
Groan. I have no doubt that mocking emails are piling up in David Gale's inbox; I further have no doubt that Prof. Gale is wishing he had been a bit more clear on what the Federal study was saying about medians and what he was saying about means. As to whether the reporter inadvertently misrepresented the study to him (Mean, median, hey, I'm on deadline!), or Gale misunderstood the question, who knows? But clearly neither the Times reporter nor her editors understood what they were presenting.
But let me just add this - Gale blew it, and the ends did not justify the means.
For those who care, the article overcomes this ghastly start to make some plausible points about cultural pre-dispositions to misreporting by both sexes.
MORE: Singular Values makes a similar point.
TROUBLING: A reader revolt:
Well, on behalf of the males here, I appreciate your efforts, TM. I really do.
But, let's face it, we're lying.
I have nothing to say on the record.
MEANS AND MEDIANS AT BERKELEY: Brad DeLong illustrated the difference at David Brooks' expense in July.
The sad part is that question resulting in a poll.
What the hell is this world coming to?
Posted by: Jane | August 15, 2007 at 08:20 PM
What the hell is this world coming to?
Answer:
Mark Steyn
Posted by: Ann | August 15, 2007 at 08:47 PM
I can LINK! I can LINK! I can LINK!
(Sorry, but my twelve year old would be so impressed)
Now if only, I could start a new JOM thread all by myself.:)
Posted by: Ann | August 15, 2007 at 08:57 PM
Thanks, HIT. I'vebeen traveling all day and just caught your encomium.Very sweet. Beer is on the way.
Posted by: clarice | August 15, 2007 at 09:25 PM
encomium
Dang, Clarice, I had to look that one up. Learn something everday hanging around JOM.
Posted by: Barry | August 15, 2007 at 09:52 PM
To get an "encomium" don't you have to be dead, first?
In other words "ecomiums" are given by the living, in praise of the dead. Or dearly departed. You know. They don't hear you. They've walked "on."
Posted by: Carol Herman | August 15, 2007 at 10:13 PM
Carol,
Don't be such a sourpuss. A syn for encomium is tribute.
Posted by: Ann | August 15, 2007 at 10:26 PM
I'm in Wyoming..so I have departed..at least temporarily..sMOOCHES.
Posted by: clarice | August 15, 2007 at 10:38 PM
Clarice: " I'm in Wyoming..."
Oh, sure. Jackson Hole? Dinner with the Cheneys? You better have some stories to tell, girl!"
Posted by: centralcal | August 15, 2007 at 10:47 PM
Anyone want some funny news about Firedoglake?
Caution Foul Language
Posted by: Ann | August 15, 2007 at 10:54 PM
No, central. Dinner with my granddaughter. when her mom told her this morning that they were flying out Friday to be with us, the darling (2 y.o.)responded,"Let's get moving!"
Posted by: clarice | August 16, 2007 at 12:03 AM
That's adorable, clarice.
Posted by: MayBee | August 16, 2007 at 12:21 AM
Clarice:
I'm in Wyoming..so I have departed..at least temporarily
Good for you! Have a fun and relaxing time. :grits teeth:: OK, I am a little jealous and miss the tetons...but happy for you!
Posted by: hit and run | August 16, 2007 at 07:41 AM
They don't have the votes because, and again my math ain't pure but, 3.2% of poll respondents identify the current stance on Iraq as the reason they disapprove of the job congress is doing.
Would you want to vote to cut off funding when only 3.2% of your constituents say they're upset with you for doing it?
- Hit & Run
Happy Thursday Hit..
I respectfully Disagree..alittle bit..
The point i was trying to make and did such a poor job of doing is this..
Our Lame Democratic leadership..IF it had the votes would pull out of Iraq ASAP and leave the middle east to burn.. BUT..just recently a few of them have come to realize that we can't just pull out and leave the middle east to terrorists..
I dunno Hit.. I'm still drugged up on cold meds and make no sense at all..sorry..
Hey say this out loud " Democratic Leadership"
kindof makes ya giggle hearing it...
Man..I am departed.... :)
Posted by: HoosierHoops | August 16, 2007 at 08:08 AM
Our Lame Democratic leadership..IF it had the votes would pull out of Iraq ASAP and leave the middle east to burn.. BUT..just recently a few of them have come to realize that we can't just pull out and leave the middle east to terrorists..
I agree that the leadership would pull out ASAP, but I trace that back to Schumers "compelling numbers, astounding numbers" more than a true desire to "bring the troops home".
And I don't think they've had any change of heart on the perils of leaving the middle east to burn -- I think the number are incredibly uncompellng and unastounding for Dems to play the cut and run game when there is actual progress going on in Iraq ... which in turn moves polls away from favoring cut and run policy.
Tell Americans we can't win -- and have the media provide evidence that can be used to back up that claim -- and Americans will want out.
Tell Americans that we can win, that we will win -- and have the media provide evidence that be used to back up that claim -- and Americans will want to kick ass.
We see the changes going on in the media, we see signs of progress, we see polls moving.
We see dems cutting and running from cutting and running.
Posted by: hit and run | August 16, 2007 at 08:28 AM
I mean, the next thing you know, we're going to have a dem presidential candidate start backing away from blaming everything on Bush....in 5...4...3...2...1...
Posted by: hit and run | August 16, 2007 at 08:30 AM
Ann From your link:
In the land of the blind, the Muslim taxi driver is king:
A North Vancouver taxi company has agreed to pay a blind Vancouver man $2,500 after one of its drivers refused to pick up the man because he was accompanied by his guide dog.
-----------------------------
You asked what the world is coming to?
You see this story doesn't bother me in the least...what bothers me is the settlement..
I would sue for 12-200 million dollars just to get the attention of the cab company...
You want to employ muslims that won't pick me up cause i have a guide dog or because I am carrying booze..fine..I'll put you out of business. in fact cutie pie lil johnny edwards isn't doing anything worthwhile these days..maybe I'd hire him to sue ya.
Flying Imans? I'd sue em for a Billion..countersue..oversue..fight back in the courts...
what's this world coming to?
Lawyers!
Posted by: hoosierhoops | August 16, 2007 at 09:05 AM
hoopster:
in fact cutie pie lil johnny edwards isn't doing anything worthwhile these days..maybe I'd hire him to sue ya.
I heard Edwards refused to represent the Rutgers basketball player in her suit against Imus because the girl wouldn't agree to contingency fees of 95% any settlement or judgement she was awarded.
[VIMH: You heard?]
Yeah, it was you saying that last night.
Posted by: hit and run | August 16, 2007 at 09:14 AM
Lance Dutton's attackers at Mainewebreport.com still think we are losing the war.
============================
Posted by: kim | August 16, 2007 at 09:18 AM
Maybe Imus can go after NoBby Cranialed newscasters now that he is no longer nobbled.
========================
Posted by: kim | August 16, 2007 at 09:20 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,293373,00.html>A moment, please, to reflect on the death of the King.
Posted by: Sue | August 16, 2007 at 09:38 AM
Steve's not in his blog;
All's not right with the world.
=================
Posted by: kim | August 16, 2007 at 09:41 AM
Robert Samuelson trashes his own magazine over its global warming reporting. So where is Steve McIntyre's blog, climateaudit.org
================
Posted by: kim | August 16, 2007 at 10:02 AM
Sue:
A moment, please, to reflect on the death of the King.
In an effort to promote greater understanding, I think we should call Elvis Mohammed.
Posted by: hit and run | August 16, 2007 at 10:05 AM
Kim,
CA has been up since yesterday. (It may not stay up through today as it is being moved). McIntyre has been doing some media appearances.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | August 16, 2007 at 10:20 AM
TNX, Rick; that's a relief.
==============
Posted by: kim | August 16, 2007 at 10:26 AM
I can't watch it at work, but it's Jonah v Peter Beinart on the Beauchamp affiar.......
I have very low expectations.
Posted by: hit and run | August 16, 2007 at 10:28 AM
kim:
TNX, Rick; that's a relief.
OK, now that that mystery is solved, onto the next and more important one.
Where's Tom?
A little part of me dies each time I hit refresh and there's no new post.
Posted by: hit and run | August 16, 2007 at 10:30 AM
H & R,
Tom may be a little preoccupied with this situation. Asia had a rough day and Europe tagged along.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | August 16, 2007 at 10:44 AM
I'm guessing the delicate sensibilities Congresswoman Nancy Boyda were spared, as she likely wasn't a part of the listening audience last night for Hugh Hewitt's interview of Gen. Jack Keane.
The ending:
Sorry, meant to say, SPOILER ALERT.
Posted by: hit and run | August 16, 2007 at 11:24 AM
Posted by: cathyf | August 16, 2007 at 11:31 AM
H&R: I tried to watch Beinart v. Jonah, but you are right it was lame. The Rove resignation came at just the right time to divert everyone's attention away from TNR and Beauchamp. So, I guess Foer keeps his job due to a Rovian plot?
I was hoping for another thread too - whatever became of the FBI investigation into DOJ Lawyer Tamm? Anyone here know or have any guesses?
Have any of the regulars watched the clip of Joe Scarborough saying the MSNBC newsroom booing the 2003 State of the Union speech? I am starting to think that by next year, the old, legacy media should be polling with similar favorability ratings as Congress.
Posted by: centralcal | August 16, 2007 at 11:35 AM
VDH on anonymous sources journalism:
Sometimes the result of this increasing abuse is more lasting damage to the authors than any temporary discomfort of fending off cross-examination. Beauchamp is now a disgraced storyteller. The New Republic has lost whatever credibility it had regained after its embarrassment several years ago of printing false stories by Stephen Glass, the lying reporter who likewise used anonymous sources.
Scheuer sounds goofier each time he gives an interview — and the credibility of his once anonymously written Imperial Hubris shakier and shakier. Isikoff has never quite recovered his journalistic reputation. We all know what happened to Dan Rather.
I simply add that it could not have happened to a more deserving group of guys.
Posted by: Gmax | August 16, 2007 at 11:35 AM
H&R: Bryan Preston gives a recap of Beinart v. Jonah over at HotAir.
Posted by: centralcal | August 16, 2007 at 11:49 AM
For anyone following the story of the old woman showing unfired-still-in-the-cartridge bullets that were "shot" at her house, you've got to check out this. Spew warning!
This one is worth a chuckle, too.
Posted by: cathyf | August 16, 2007 at 12:16 PM
If you ask me, that puppy should stop its whining and be grateful that handgrenades are being used to try and take its life.
I mean, the alternative is getting severed in two by a Bradley Fighting Vehicle.
Posted by: hit and run | August 16, 2007 at 12:28 PM
Hit and Run,
I think references to "2/5" can produce impressive results, but only if used sparingly. Perhaps, once every two months instead of twice in the last week or so.
And I have a question too. Where's Other Tom?
Posted by: Elliott | August 16, 2007 at 12:30 PM
Probably would help too if I said Mongol, instead of Mongrel...
But again, the facts don't matter, The Narrative™ is right.
Posted by: hit and run | August 16, 2007 at 12:46 PM
Where's Other Tom?
Italy
He's doing some research on the Italiacto! spell.
Posted by: boris | August 16, 2007 at 12:52 PM
H&R, given the motley crew here, "mongrel horde" is probably more accurate. (Remember Bill Murray's speech in Stripes where he said Americans are all mutts, and have the cold noses to prove it?)
Posted by: cathyf | August 16, 2007 at 01:02 PM
Padilla found guilty on all counts
Posted by: Jane | August 16, 2007 at 02:31 PM
Jane,
I'm reading the comments about the guilty verdicts at Kos http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/16/breaking-padilla-verdict-expected-at-2-pm/>Link is to Hot Air. It is so amazing to me how the left doesn't trust DoJ when it is prosecuting terrorists but just love DoJ when it is prosecuting someone in the Bush administration. No bias there, huh?
Posted by: Sue | August 16, 2007 at 02:41 PM
They should have had Fitzgerald head the prosecution. Then the guilty verdict would not have been in doubt, since they just luuuuuv him.
Posted by: Sue | August 16, 2007 at 02:42 PM
Fitzgerald would have given Padilla immunity.
Posted by: cathyf | August 16, 2007 at 02:59 PM
Don't think for a second that Rove isn't responsible for Padilla's actions.
He's leaving the administration so that Padilla doesn't flip on him.
Posted by: hit and run | August 16, 2007 at 03:01 PM
You know it's funny, I figured that a Florida jury might just find him guilty. I would never have thought that of a NY or DC jury - which seems to prove that at least in my mind most trials these days are political trials.
If that's true, the republic is screwed.
Posted by: Jane | August 16, 2007 at 03:09 PM
Thnx.Maybe..the kid is a pistol.HIT, I'm kicking you in the shins.You promised me that Padilla tip would just be between you and me.
Posted by: clarice | August 16, 2007 at 03:11 PM
Cathy,
Fitzgerald would have given Padilla immunity.
True.
Posted by: Sue | August 16, 2007 at 03:15 PM
Clarice:
You promised me that Padilla tip would just be between you and me.
Don't ever believe any promise I make while sober.
But I am sorry.
I Blame Bush
Posted by: hit and run | August 16, 2007 at 04:19 PM
Fitz not only would have given him immunity but would have prosecuted a member of community who called the FBI with a tip on the activities of this guy. And then the MSM would vilify the member of the community not for trying to get the word out, but for violating his civil rights! Some place the VIPS shadows would be seen and if you look carefully the strings on the marionettes they control would be just visible too.
Posted by: Gmax | August 16, 2007 at 04:38 PM
Jenna Bush is engaged. Wouldn't a White House wedding be a great morale booster for the country?
Posted by: bio mom | August 16, 2007 at 04:45 PM
More Random thoughts from the hoopster..
Doesn't Padilla look good after years in the cell...Gosh all that torture and stuff..
Looks like he lost 25 lbs and has a healthy glow..why not put up posters in Gitmo? Before and after looks of the illegals..
hey now..ya got to look good when you are dealing with 77 virgins..
( look.. this started out as a sex posting from TM don't blame me )
2) Cathyf: You are a genius about the pants suit lawyer..I love the idea..
Lawyers are like sperm..only one in a 100 million do any good..( see prior about sex posting )
3) So I've been really sick the last couple days and needed cheap entertainment between passing out...
Want laughs? Read FDL.. one person there canceled thier AT&T iPhone account because she was SURE that AT&T was spying on Americans. I mean it was better than a Leno Segment...
Want Dreams? Goto Hawaiichannel.com home page and view the beach webcams..
4) OK Cold pills and Crown & Coke doesn't cure the common cold.. Well maybe..I'm feeling much better now mommy...
5) Note to TM...If you post a survey about sex here it quickly melts back into a political blog...So does that mean everyone here is really politically savvy or just really old? :)
Thanks everyone..i think it's all going alittle blurry again and ...egrgyjm zzzzzz
Posted by: HoosierHoops | August 16, 2007 at 04:52 PM
--Want laughs? Read FDL--
Yeah - I'm pretty amused at their- Susan Collins better apologize that a blogger called us a foul-mouthed fem blog OR ELSE!!!!!
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | August 16, 2007 at 05:01 PM
OR ELSE!!!!! --- we will make a paper-maiche float of her kissing Leiberman and follow her around with it!
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | August 16, 2007 at 05:04 PM
Lance dropped a little can of sodium into that muckpond. He didn't stand far enough away.
I'd join the mudwrestling, but since when do you have to register to get hot and slimy?
==============
Posted by: kim | August 16, 2007 at 05:09 PM
Steve McIntyre's under the radar again, Rick; where next, I need my fix? Poor fella, he got called a US economist by a British newspaper.
====================================
Posted by: kim | August 16, 2007 at 05:23 PM
Sue - i have to dash but i sent you an email that I know will please and amuse you very, very, very much.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | August 16, 2007 at 05:25 PM
See Dick Run. The Ball has Spots.
=====================
Posted by: kim | August 16, 2007 at 05:28 PM
Thanks Top. I'll go check it out now.
Posted by: Sue | August 16, 2007 at 05:29 PM
Top,
Or not. Nothing there. I'll keep checking.
Posted by: Sue | August 16, 2007 at 05:31 PM
Kim,
Nah. He's up. If you like slash and burn on the warmermongers Warrick Hughes is great. Luboš Motl is quite willing to name idiots and Roger Pielke Sr. provides an excellent "real" climate science blog.
You won't see me in comments at those places 'cause, well,
I just ain't smart enoughI don't have time. That's it, lack of time.Posted by: Rick Ballard | August 16, 2007 at 05:33 PM
Patience is not my virtue. ::grin::
Got it. Thanks Top!
Posted by: Sue | August 16, 2007 at 05:34 PM
I think I've never heard so loud
The quiet message of a cloud.
===================
Posted by: kim | August 16, 2007 at 05:48 PM
Kim,
Yep. It's rather entertaining to see him being attacked for his metaphysics while they leave his physics quite untouched.
If there were away to strip the warmermongers of argumentum ad verecundiam and agumentum ad hominem they would be left mute.
Pardon me, Climate Emperor, but your butt looks quite flabby there in the breeze.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | August 16, 2007 at 06:08 PM
So which one is Jenna? The blond or the brunette?
Posted by: Jane | August 16, 2007 at 06:55 PM
Jenna is the chunkier one who went to UT.
Posted by: Ralph L | August 16, 2007 at 07:11 PM
I thought you all might get a kick of the storyline as it appears on CNN's web page:
Jenna Bush to wed a former Rove aide
So, CNN not only suffers from BDS but apparently RDS as well! HA
Posted by: Tina | August 16, 2007 at 07:20 PM
Jenna WAS the chunkier one--she looks almost scrawny in the second picture with the CNN story.
Posted by: Ralph L | August 16, 2007 at 07:43 PM
Sex Toys Kit Sex Toys Kit
Online Sex Toys Online Sex Toys
Adult Gags Adult Gags
cock rings cock rings
Fucking Machines Fucking Machines
Sex Machines Sex Machines
g spot vibrator g spot vibrator
Bondage Restraints Bondage Restraints
erotic christmas gift erotic christmas gift
Posted by: adult toys | October 15, 2007 at 01:33 AM
wow gold
wow gold
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
World Of Warcraft power leveling
World Of Warcraft power leveling
World Of Warcraft power leveling
World Of Warcraft powerleveling
World Of Warcraft powerleveling
World Of Warcraft powerleveling
wow power level
wow power level
wow power level
cheap wow power leveling
cheap wow power leveling
cheap wow powerleveling
cheap wow powerleveling
codeheart article
Warcraft Gold
World of Warcraft Gold
cheap wow gold
Posted by: wow power leveling | October 19, 2007 at 09:42 PM
wow gold
wow gold
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
World Of Warcraft power leveling
World Of Warcraft power leveling
World Of Warcraft power leveling
World Of Warcraft powerleveling
World Of Warcraft powerleveling
World Of Warcraft powerleveling
wow power level
wow power level
wow power level
cheap wow power leveling
cheap wow power leveling
cheap wow powerleveling
cheap wow powerleveling
codeheart article
Warcraft Gold
World of Warcraft Gold
cheap wow gold
Posted by: wow power leveling | October 19, 2007 at 11:21 PM
Phentermine is used, in combination with diet and exercise,to help you lose weight. It works by decreasing your appetite. - http://phentermine.weightloss.lt
Tenuate decreases appetite. It is used on a short-term basis (a few weeks), in combination with diet, to help you lose weight. - http://tenuate.weightloss.lt
Posted by: medications | January 22, 2008 at 05:42 AM
The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). Lincoln, its director, employees and agents, makes no representation and gives no warranty as to the accuracy of this communication and does not accept any responsibility for any errors or inaccuracies in or omissions from this communication (whether negligent or otherwise) and shall not be liable for any loss or damage howsoever arising as a result of any person acting or refraining from acting in reliance on any information contained herein. No reader should rely on this communication as it does not purport to be comprehensive or to render advice. This disclaimer does not purport to exclude any warranties implied by law which may not be lawfully excluded. We have taken precautions to minimise the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this e-mail. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses.
roulette online
online video poker
blackjack online
Posted by: dfg | July 17, 2008 at 01:55 AM
The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). Lincoln, its director, employees and agents,
Posted by: battery | December 29, 2008 at 09:11 AM
I do not know how to use the rs gold ; my friend tells me how to use.
Posted by: sophy | January 06, 2009 at 11:44 PM