Reading Playboy For The Articles
Keith Olbermann is interviewed in the October 2007 Playboy; their free preview offered a snippet so dumb I felt obliged to reprise it:
PLAYBOY: On Countdown this past April, after Rudolph Giuliani made a speech saying Democrats would make us more vulnerable to terrorist attacks, you went off on him for eight solid minutes. You seemed truly offended by what he'd said.
OLBERMANN: Giuliani tried to out-Bush Bush. He tried to get votes by talking about casualties as if another attack like 9/11 were inevitable, suggesting that voting for anyone but him would lead to more people getting killed. That's about an inch from saying, "If you don't vote for me, you'll die," which is another inch from saying, "If you don't vote for me, I'll kill you." And that, to me, is not America. In fact, it's not Earth. I don't usually single out candidates for praise or brickbats, but if they're going to politicize terror, to do the work of the terrorists by terrorizing the populace, I'll come down on them like a ton of bricks. That's my job.
So let me see if I have mastered this "logic" - when Al Gore says that global warming is a gathering threat, and so on, he is one inch from saying that if we don't vote for environmentally sound candidates we will die, and two inches from saying that he will personally kill us (I presume a coroner would rule it death by boredom, but really - anyone listening to Al Gore for more than a nanosecond ought to be ruled a suicide.)
Or, work with me, Keith - Nancy Pelosi thinks if we don't vote for stricter gun control we will die, which is two inches from saying she will personally gun us down like Michael Vick's dogs.
There you have it - more proof of the study we cited earlier today showing the Beautiful Minds of the left.

I heart this one, Tom. I really do.
Posted by: Clarice | September 10, 2007 at 10:35 PM
Olberman the doberman. I hear he also said that Fox News was more dangerous than AlQaida or the KKK.
The guy is a loon. An honest to God out of his freaking mind loon.
Posted by: Terrye | September 10, 2007 at 10:44 PM
But since almost no one watches MSNBC it really does not matter that much. Yawn.
Posted by: Gmax | September 10, 2007 at 10:53 PM
What is the resident political, war expert Keith Olbermmann doing on NBC for football commentary?
The humanity....
Posted by: roanoke | September 11, 2007 at 12:01 AM
What is the resident political, war expert Keith Olbermmann doing on NBC for football commentary?
The humanity....
Posted by: roanoke | September 11, 2007 at 12:01 AM
OLBERMANN:
That's about an inch from saying, "If you don't vote for me, you'll die," which is another inch from saying, "If you don't vote for me, I'll kill you."
Olbermann is really saying that you better do what Rudy says or he'll 'wack' you. Maybe Olbermann thinks all Italians are mafia killers at heart?
Posted by: liontooth | September 11, 2007 at 12:50 AM
Posted by: Cecil Turner | September 11, 2007 at 07:33 AM
The guy is a loon.
He's also the go-to guy for the moonbats. I see him quoted endlessly.
Posted by: Jane | September 11, 2007 at 07:45 AM
What is the resident political, war expert Keith Olbermmann doing on NBC for football commentary?
The humanity....
Posted by: roanoke
I believe Keith got his start doing sports broadcasting.. a sports anchor in L.A.
I'm not sure how he got into political stuff on MSNBC.
Posted by: HoosierHoops | September 11, 2007 at 09:21 AM
The day Keith Olbermann finally realizes will be the day he sees the flash of light
over New York from Ft. Lee NY; and right before he's blinded; he'll think like Comic Store Man in the Simpson's take on Omega Man; "Man I wasted my life"
Posted by: narciso | September 11, 2007 at 09:25 AM
The day Keith Olbermann finally realizes will be the day he sees the flash of light
over New York from Ft. Lee NY; and right before he's blinded; he'll think like Comic Store Man in the Simpson's take on Omega Man; "Man I wasted my life"
Posted by: narciso | September 11, 2007 at 09:25 AM
REWRITE:
Posted by: hit and run | September 11, 2007 at 09:33 AM
** That's about an inch from saying "If you don't vote for me, you'll die," which is another inch from saying, "If you don't vote for me, I'll kill you." **
I see Keith favors the non-Euclidean form of politics whereby you fold the graph paper around a ball, turn the ball into a donut shaped torus, and stretch and twist that shape until the graph shows the fanatics that want to kill all of us are an inch away from the candidate who's out that his rival doesn't consider that a problem.
Keith Olbermann: Geometer.
-
Posted by: BumperStickerist | September 11, 2007 at 09:38 AM
Gmax said: "But since almost no one watches MSNBC it really does not matter that much. Yawn."
According to TVNewser Obermann is increasing his ratings. NRO's media blog took notice of this also. While, I agree that he has a "niche" audience - too many lefty nutjobs are looking for a television icon to pair up with their web icon (Kos). Bill Maher just isn't quite "insane" enough, and Olby certainly is.
Posted by: centralcal | September 11, 2007 at 09:42 AM
I totally flubbed the REWRITE...
See the Cap'n who quotes Olbermann:
Yes, that damn Giuliani wants to protect us from another 9/11, while Olbermann wants to protect us from the Fox News Branch of the KKK.
Nuance. Measured in Inches.
Posted by: hit and run | September 11, 2007 at 10:09 AM
oh also Keith was an anchor for ESPN sportscenter for 10 years..he left under a cloud..something bad happened..don't know the story about what the issue was.
Posted by: HoosierHoops | September 11, 2007 at 10:28 AM
A little help, please?
What's MSNBC?
Keith Who?
Posted by: Greybeard | September 11, 2007 at 11:18 AM
A little help, please?
What's MSNBC?
Keith Who?
Posted by: Greybeard | September 11, 2007 at 11:19 AM
A little help, please?
What's MSNBC?
Keith Who?
Posted by: Greybeard | September 11, 2007 at 11:19 AM
A little help, please?
What's MSNBC?
Keith Who?
Posted by: Greybeard | September 11, 2007 at 11:19 AM
I was thinking John Edwards: An inch away from saying, "If you don't vote for me you'll be a cripple," and two inches away from saying, "If you don't vote for me, I'll break your neck."
Not as bad as Al Gore personally killing you, but in the ballpark.
Posted by: km | September 11, 2007 at 12:13 PM
Greybeard, if you vote for me, I'll fix your stutter.
Posted by: km | September 11, 2007 at 12:13 PM
If you don't vote for me, I'll rip your tongue out.
Posted by: km | September 11, 2007 at 12:14 PM
"If you don't vote for me, I'll kill you." And that, to me, is not America. In fact, it's not Earth.
It is in fact Earth. Can we think of leaders who actually have done such a thing. Why yes we can. Saddam Hussein killed people who didn't vote for him.
But he was just a strong man holding a difficult country together. Giuliani's fascist rhetoric is a real danger.
Posted by: MayBee | September 11, 2007 at 12:24 PM
You can't km, it fell out with all the laughing.
===================
Posted by: kim | September 11, 2007 at 12:39 PM
Keith Olbermann is just a Jon Stewart wantabee.
Posted by: Neo | September 11, 2007 at 01:59 PM
No wonder Playboy's circulation is in the dump--it's not even worth reading for the featured articles.
According to KO, pointing out terrorism and expressing an opinion on the implications thereof, is to do the work of terrorists, is itself, a train of thought devoid of reason--or even an argument. That KO spent eight minutes ranting on about such suggests a lack of logical coherence that is mind numbing--and apparently has that effect on his audience, even if growing--as he's watched by less than half the households that watches O'Reilly. (And I don't watch either.)
Cheers.
Posted by: Forbes | September 11, 2007 at 03:45 PM
This is what happens when someone spends years as a jocksniffer.
Posted by: SmokeVanThorn | September 11, 2007 at 05:58 PM
Olbermann is neither looney nor stupid. He does not believe a word of the stuff he spews out. Watch him sometime (if you can stand it). It would be too hard to maintain his tone of smirking superiority if he had to justify intellectually (to himself) such nonsense.
What Olbermann has done is to discover and pander to a market niche--there are more than enough moonbats who can be counted on to buy his stuff--as well as teens and other "young skulls full of mush" who respond to the tone rather than the substance--to keep his ratings high enough to earn him a good, steady living. And they are less likely to call him on his crap than the sports fan contingent, who can tell that he's full of it because they actually watch the games.
Posted by: BOATBUILDER | September 11, 2007 at 09:36 PM
Leave it to MSNBC to have a wantabee jock that wants to kill us.
Posted by: Neo | September 12, 2007 at 09:47 AM
My email to NBC:
Posted by: sbw | September 12, 2007 at 10:19 AM
Heh! (To quote the Instapundit.) Doesn't it figure that the NBC email feedback address fails:
Posted by: sbw | September 12, 2007 at 10:54 AM
While I do not agree with everything Oberman says I also do not agree with everything Oriley says either. Truth lies somewhere in the middle. I personally read and listen to both conservative and liberal news, both sides make valid points. The only way to to make an informed decision on any matter in the news is to listen to what both sides say and then draw your own conclusion.
Posted by: Darclay | September 12, 2007 at 11:25 AM
While I do not agree with everything Oberman says I also do not agree with everything Oriley says either. Truth lies somewhere in the middle. I personally read and listen to both conservative and liberal news, both sides make valid points. The only way to to make an informed decision on any matter in the news is to listen to what both sides say and then draw your own conclusion.
Posted by: Darclay | September 12, 2007 at 11:25 AM
Does Al Gore Know about this ?
Posted by: Neo | September 12, 2007 at 11:55 AM
Truth lies somewhere in the middle.
Sorry, but I'm having a hard time seeing this as a conservative-liberal divide issue. Olbermann seems to find it offensive that someone running for president--the main duty of which is national defense--would claim the people would be safer voting for him. That's such a stupidly wrongheaded premise that no possible compromise can lead from there to the truth. Moreover, the idea that it's "his job" to castigate politicians . . . or that the rest of us are waiting with bated breath for his delivered wisdom, is so much nonsense. At best this is entertainment.
If your point is that O'Reilly has said something as stupid, I'd probably accept that. (And if someone feels like digging one up, we can all have a laugh at it.) Don't see how it could be a lot farther off-base than this drivel, though.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | September 12, 2007 at 11:58 AM
"[B]ut really - anyone listening to Al Gore for more than a nanosecond ought to be ruled a suicide."
Classic TM.
Posted by: Chants | September 12, 2007 at 02:08 PM
My worry is what the centrefold of Olberman looks like.
Posted by: PeterUK | September 12, 2007 at 04:25 PM
Sorry, but I'm having a hard time seeing this as a conservative-liberal divide issue.
Maybe those were the wrong terms to use. I was just stating that opposing viewpoints are necessary to be informed. No one has all the answerers right all of the time. But your point was well taken about all having a laugh.
Posted by: Darclay | September 12, 2007 at 04:45 PM
That's about an inch from saying, "If you don't vote for me, you'll die," which is another inch from saying, "If you don't vote for me, I'll kill you."
Keith Olberman. Two inches from insanity.
Olbermann comes on the air, I click the channel. It's as simple as that.
Ditto.
Posted by: Terry Gain | September 12, 2007 at 05:18 PM
This just isn't liberals' day. Turns out that Hsu would stand up and walk out on the friends he was getting by with a little help from. The same guys who bankrolled the original Woodstock festival:
Smart...very smart guys.
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | September 12, 2007 at 06:03 PM
Something tells me Olbermann will soon admit to breaking his own bones as a child to get attention.
Posted by: Patton | September 12, 2007 at 06:39 PM
I personally don't need Giuliani to scare me. I'm already scared. I've been scared for 6 years and 1 day, since the World Trade Center came down. Reality scares me.
Posted by: miriam | September 12, 2007 at 10:21 PM
Posted by: Walter | September 12, 2007 at 11:57 PM
Reality scares me.
At least it's logical to fear an attack (though the probability is such that it probably ought not drive one's daily decisions). Contrast that with this stupidity from Clinton:
She, like Olbermann, apparently considers an attack that kills people only a threat as it would affect the political chances of Dem candidates. And there's simply no way to have a rational discussion with that as a premise.Posted by: Cecil Turner | September 13, 2007 at 09:26 AM
I must quarrel with the idea that truth lies somewhere in the middle. Then it wouldn't be truth. It is one thing or another. It cannot be both. It brings to mind the words of Christ. "Be hot or cold, but if you are lukewarm I will vomit you out." Now different people may see the truth differently but what I find the most disquieting are people who waffle around looking for a squishy middle in serious matters, for example, our national security. I am pretty hawkish overall. But I respect those anti-war folks who SERIOUSLY believe that their truth is correct. I just vehemently disagree with them. Olbermann's way though is snide, viscious, and ill-informed. He ignores the facts for his ideology many times.
Posted by: bio mom | September 13, 2007 at 11:54 AM
I must quarrel with the idea that truth lies somewhere in the middle. Then it wouldn't be truth. It is one thing or another. It cannot be both. It brings to mind the words of Christ. "Be hot or cold, but if you are lukewarm I will vomit you out." Now different people may see the truth differently but what I find the most disquieting are people who waffle around looking for a squishy middle in serious matters, for example, our national security. I am pretty hawkish overall. But I respect those anti-war folks who SERIOUSLY believe that their truth is correct. I just vehemently disagree with them. Olbermann's way though is snide, viscious, and ill-informed. He ignores the facts for his ideology many times.
Posted by: bio mom | September 13, 2007 at 11:55 AM
I must quarrel with the idea that truth lies somewhere in the middle. Then it wouldn't be truth. It is one thing or another. It cannot be both. It brings to mind the words of Christ. "Be hot or cold, but if you are lukewarm I will vomit you out." Now different people may see the truth differently but what I find the most disquieting are people who waffle around looking for a squishy middle in serious matters, for example, our national security. I am pretty hawkish overall. But I respect those anti-war folks who SERIOUSLY believe that their truth is correct. I just vehemently disagree with them. Olbermann's way though is snide, viscious, and ill-informed. He ignores the facts for his ideology many times.
Posted by: bio mom | September 13, 2007 at 11:55 AM
Bio Mom : ( cool nick )
must quarrel with the idea that truth lies somewhere in the middle. Then it wouldn't be truth. It is one thing or another. It cannot be both. It brings to mind the words of Christ. "Be hot or cold, but if you are lukewarm I will vomit you out." Now different people may see the truth differently but what I find the most disquieting are people who waffle around looking for a squishy middle in serious matters,
__________________________________
point one: that jesus quote was about your faith in god not politics. he was admonishing a lukewarm church..enough of religion now...I think the point about dicerning truth being in the middle means this:
most people aren't hard core conservatives or liberals.. I think alot of Americans are pretty moderate in thier views..that's not to equate that to 'truth' but rather actions.
I think the Pols understand that.. they preach to the base but in the election run to the middle for votes. noteable exceptions..districts that are heavily GOP or Democratic.. but on a national level they run close to the middle..( until elected )
Regards,
Posted by: hoosierhoops | September 13, 2007 at 12:38 PM
I'm just surprised KO actually believes there are terrorists. I thought the dem meme is there is no GWOT erfo no terrorists. Maybe he just slipped up.
Posted by: BarbaraS | September 14, 2007 at 12:37 AM