Check This!


Google Ad


Memeorandum


Powered by TypePad

House Control / TradeSports

« The Times Front Pages Good News From Baghdad | Main | Presidential Meetings »

May 22, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b2aa69e200e5528047ab8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference McCain Meeting With VP Prospects?:

Comments

I could live with Romney as VP, and the face time might make him more palatable as a Pres nominee.

Thank Goodness Huckabee wasn't invited.

The Huckster cooked his own goose when he shot his mouth off joking about an assassination of a Presidential candidate. He wont be seen in any one on one shots with the nominee but of course he will be at the convention probably with one of those ridiculous hog hats on down in the crowd.

I don't know about that, Tom ,but he's been a little too Green in his enthusiasm, too willing to beat up on insurance companies in
a restricted market, too willing to gives ex-felons the right to vote. On the positive
side, he has offered up a tax cut; but the real estate revenue crunch is going to squash that. Jindal's too young, and
Louisiana's chance at reform is too
important to curtail now. It would be interesting if they tried the Blanco camp tried in LA the first time around. I guess the default choice is Romney, because no one has a clue about Pawlenty; (except the Democrats will say, he was in charge when the bridge collapsed, never mind that the warnings go back to 1990)Romney offers the economic card, strong foreign policy credentials, et al. We may need food tasters at cabinet meetings, though:

Which means Romney is the guy, from this group anyway.

He's not mine. Look how he undermined healthcare in Massachusetts.The new Big Dig which may be for subscribers only.

Mitt Romney's presidential run is history, but it looks as if the taxpayers of Massachusetts will be paying for it for years to come. The former Governor had hoped to ride his grand state "universal" health-care reform of 2006 to the White House, but his state's residents are now having to live with what he and the state's Democratic Legislature passed. As the Boston press likes to say, it's "the new Big Dig."

As the WSJ editorial concludes, "The Bay State is showing everyone how not to reform health care."

OTOH - he's meeting with three governors (yeah, Mitt is a "former") and might just be discussingthe situation within their respective states. While generating a little ink, of course.

I don't really see a benefit to picking a running mate at this point. That said, Romney is the logical choice (within this group) due to his MI connection and the fact that he actually has a clue to economics. The downside is that the bill has started coming due in MA for his insurance plan and it's somewhat higher than promised (what a shock).

Look its pretty rare that a Vice Presidential nominee has much impact. There is a reason that passed on wisdom about the pick is that the first rule of the pick is " Do no harm."

Still Romney for some of his faults, may be a unique candidate for his ability to have some small but perhaps measurable impact on the outcome in 4 States, maybe 5. First as Rick duly points out, in my State of birth, his Dad was a well known and well liked Governor and head of American Motors. The name has recognition still there and if Michigan flips the Dems are in deep deep trouble. Besides Kwame fouling the well, they have the worst economy ( probably a true recession there ) in the country and the Democrats are in charge at the Governor level. Plus the whole not seating delegates from there is making enemies.

He is a multiple elected Governor in Mass. Its closer there in the Presidential race than it has been in a long time, maybe the reflection of Deval Patrick is making voters in Mass think twice. No I dont think he flips Mass, but making the Dems spend time might be a very good thing.

He is a Mormom as the MSM let us know endlessly. That helps in Nevada where some polls show it fairly close.

Ditto in Colorado and the Republicans sure need it there according to recent polls.

Finally he might help some in NM.

I would put him on the ticket, as he will also bring back some of those 15% of Republicans still grumbling about McCain and that is a good thing too.

I still think Michael Steele would be an excellent choice, but when I think it through tactically, he does not have the same plusses of Romney.

I haven't called him 'Joltin' Joe' Lieberman for nothing. This will be an awful jolt to the Democrats.

c, remember I touted Giuliani for AG when Gonzales left. It is still a good idea. Who better to prosecute the Clintons? But be wary, more SDNY. And twenty years ago he was an abusive prosecutor.
===================================

I still think Romney is the cream of the crop, but I've been persuaded the MSM will never again allow him electoral office. Hire him as Chief Operating Officer.
=====================================

SBW,

Deval Patrick expanded and corrupted Romney's health care plan, by adding things like "mandatory podiatry benefits". The plan was never in place under the Romney administration so it is tough to calculate the damage. It could be that it would have worked well if the pork wasn't added. While Governor Romney was very good fiscally for the most part from what I could tell.

Jane, I heard Huckabee was invited, but declined due to a planned cruise.

"Crist is a closeted gay, I have read."

I read he was a Republican, so that confirms it.

Jane, as someone who used to practice medicine in Mass, I have to say that was one of my objections beforehand and why I didn't care for the Romney plan. It was set up to be corrupted; most mandatory government plans are. It's just the inevitable gravitational pull of bureaucracy. He's probably the best of the bunch - I voted for him, but his plan was a bad idea from the start, IMO.

Romney removes the "MCCain doesn't know economics" meme from play, and would be an excellent attack dog on Obama's general ignorance. I think post-United Trinity any return to Mormon bashing would be obviously hypocritical even to the muddle.

JB, MSM won't expose that hypocrisy, and it is self-serving for Romney to do it. When you talk about religion, hypocrisy hides behind every bush, and sprouts many heads. With this MSM, and its fear of any but Muslim theocracy, Romney has an uphill climb even he can't afford. I wish you were right, and maybe you are. I believe he's going to be vital to our nation's future for at least 10-15 years.
======================================

Deval Patrick expanded and corrupted Romney's health care plan, by adding things like "mandatory podiatry benefits". The plan was never in place under the Romney administration so it is tough to calculate the damage. It could be that it would have worked well if the pork wasn't added.

And this is exactly the problem with ever agreeing to any kind of plan like this, which Romney should have known. Once an entitlement is created, however limited initially, it will forever expand and expand.

Anon1, GB,

I agree with both of you. But it looks like this country will not be dissuaded from deciding health care is a "right". I'd prefer Romney at the helm over Obama if that is the case.

kim, I agree with all of your points, but I'm hoping if the MSM brings it in play, a whole bunch of third parties will be able to exploit it. Maybe I'm naive, but I'm fully expecting Liberation Theology/BHO exposes by the fall.

At that point the hypocrisy could be obvious even to the perpetually confused.

Jane, we are at a very good point to begin your radio show. Were I your writer I'd begin with the question of hereditary Senate seats and what that means to the state.

Here's the thing. Nobody is saying that health care is not a "right" in the sense that people should not be discminated against in getting healthcare based on race, gender, religion, etc. In other words, I perfectly agree that the gov't should not be allowed to keep people from getting healthcare.

What the libs are arguing is not that healthcare should be a "right", but that the government should provide healthcare for free.

I have the "right" to keep and bear arms. According to what a liberal definition of a "right" is, that means the gov't should buy me whatever firearms I want.

I have the "right" to free speech. According to the liberal definition that means the gov't should provide me with a newspaper column and tv airtime to express my views.

I don't think we should concede that gov't must pay for healthcare, b/c if we do, its over. The socialists have won, there will be nothing that the gov't will not be allowed to control, regulate and distribute/redistribute as the gov't sees fit.

Hillary's pals are planning a big Count Our Votes rally in DC on May 31st..HEH

That's when the DNC takes up the question of the seating of the MI and Fla delegates.


Jane, we are at a very good point to begin your radio show. Were I your writer I'd begin with the question of hereditary Senate seats and what that means to the state.

Funny you say that. I was at a function last night with the radio station owner. He came over and said to me: "My guy is done. I called his secretary today and she said he's got a year".

Me, being the heartfelt empathetic person I am, said: "My guess is he's got a couple of weeks, which is why they let him out early"

You are dead right about the timing. But sheesh talk about pouring salt in one's wounds.

Doesn't have to be that way, and--yes--unfortunately I think that's right about the timing.

I saw him leaving the hospital and he's limping badly on his left side.

Everytime a Kennedy dies we get this "tragedy of the Kennedys" story which only helps the remaining generations who share the traits of dumb/rich/and over privileged.
If the family truly cares about public service they should pay taxes on the Tahities trust income and get real jobs.

Doesn't have to be that way, and--yes--unfortunately I think that's right about the timing.

I saw him leaving the hospital and he's limping badly on his left side.

Everytime a Kennedy dies we get this "tragedy of the Kennedys" story which only helps the remaining generations who share the traits of dumb/rich/and over privileged.
If the family truly cares about public service they should pay taxes on the Tahiti's trust income and get real jobs.

Jane,

If I knew more about MA politics and the Kennedy machine I'd love to write a "who'll call the shots now?" involving Kerry. Given that the only way to break 100 IQ with the Kennedy progeny is to sum the scores of at least two of them, I think Kerry will definitely make a ham handed lunge for the reins.

And miss.

Fair enough Jane, in the short term certainly Romney is better.

At work we recently hosted a potential recruit who has practiced in Sweden, is currently in the UK, and before that the US. It was interesting hearing her pour cold water on the eager docs rushing to get her opinion on how much 'better' things are over there for docs. She had some interesting things to say all-right. Couldn't wait to get back to the states.

Boston is *full* of expat docs who are mighty skeptical of bringing Canadian or French or whatever plans to the US, but, funnily enough, you never read their opinions in the papers that matter, etc...most get out and don't go to Harvard Publich Health, or whatever. Maybe we should stay in academia and fight that nonsense instead?

*It's very tiring if you do try and do that. It exhausted me, that's for sure.

Oh, yeah, and I can't write worth squat. That's why I chose medicine instead :) Somehow, the krebs cycle made more sense to me. Diagraming sentences, grammar, all that stuff. Torture!

It's okay with me Anon1--I'm an old lady who can't type of proofread for shit and I know exactly what you are saying and I like what I read.

**oR proofread**(See what I mean?)

A couple of things - I'm not completely opposed to pouring salt in wounds, and this saga will continue for a while.

Secondly, I haven't done a thing about the radio thing (including listening to the (very local) station), because I'm not all that sure what one does do. I figure I'll try and figure it out over the summer. The issue may be very ripe at that point, and I like it, because it makes me crazy.

Thirdly, I will never believe that health care is a "right" until someone amends the constitution - and don't give them any ideas.

Fourthly anon1 (that's a dumb name) I would think the first crisis of mandatory health care would be a lack of people willing to go to medical school - until of course we make it free.

Fifthly, Rick, I know that Cape Wind has been thoroughly manipulated by Teddy, to take it off the state's plate and federalize it. Other than that, I really don't know all that much about what shots are being called by who. They are all getting wealthy tho - state, local federal . It certainly is the way to get rich these days.

not that healthcare should be a "right", but that the government should provide healthcare for free.

The healthcare that is most affordable and covers costs that are liable to break the backs of Americans is catastrophic healthcare.

The first thing for a GOP candidate to do is to parse out catastrophic health care and advocate coverage.

The second thing to do is point out how unfunded government mandates raise the cost and limit the choices of health insurance.

Finally, point out that competition controls costs for all healthcare, offering examples like what Target and Walmart are doing for everyday minor needs like scrapes, colds, and the like.

Jane - that's a good point about training docs. We could (and should) train more but I don't see that happening in any kind of efficient way in the future. Med schools are not immune to the overinflation seen in other areas of academia.

On the plus side, I hear lots of med school cafeterias serve arugula.

(As for the name, I could use my own, or be more creative, but I don't want a comment at a blog to be the first thing that comes up when a patient googles my name, which patients do these days :) ). If google searches prioritized things in a way that was CV-burnishing, I might have to change my policies)

The downside is that the bill has started coming due in MA for his insurance plan and it's somewhat higher than promised (

Perfect. That gives Romney credibility to debate the wisdom of Obama's plan.

Anon1,

Nonnonono, don't use your own name, just something we can remember, like Florence - altho I'm sure we are getting used to Anon 1. so don't sweat it.

Mitt Romney has a brand new gig, so I question if he is going to the BBQ as a potential VP pick or to talk money/strategy:

Free and Strong America PAC

America is at an inflection point. We can either remain the strongest nation in the world, or we can become something much less. Free and Strong America PAC, through its Honorary Chairman, Mitt Romney, supports officeholders and candidates who are dedicated to promoting public policies that will strengthen America at this critical time in our history. Working together with the American people, we will advance conservative social, fiscal, and foreign policies that are essential to our nation’s strength and freedom.

If America is to remain a leader in the world, we must be prepared to face the numerous challenges of the 21st century. Whether it’s ensuring all Americans can obtain quality health care, remaining competitive in a global economy, and providing our children with a world-class education, or confronting radical jihad and the threat of nuclear terrorism, we cannot wait to find solutions.

These problems can be tackled with innovation, determination, and a commitment to our nation’s founding principles. Free and Strong America PAC will work tirelessly to help elect candidates who share these principles and are prepared to take on the challenge of keeping America free and strong.

Together with the candidates we support, and with the help of the American people, we will ensure that this great nation remains – as it always has been – the beacon of freedom and hope of the world.

Our way forward must be rooted in the core principles that have made America strong.

• Our military superiority cannot be compromised.
• Our government must remain federalist and governing should be conducted as close to the people as possible.
• Money and resources are best used when they remain in the hands of the people. A competitive America is one where taxes are low and government is small.
• Unleashing the power of free markets is key to a vibrant economic future.
• Culture makes all the difference in determining the strength of a nation. Our American values must be protected and nurtured.
• Government should be accountable and transparent.

Our greatness as a nation depends on our willingness to hold to the principles that have guided and built our nation. It depends on the character and sacrifices of the American people. Together, we will meet our challenges and leave our children and grandchildren an America that is as strong and prosperous as the one we inherited from our parents.

And from his first blog entry at the site:

Back on the Trail

I miss the campaign trail. Yes, it was grueling, but it was also energizing and what we did together was important for the country. You heard me speak time and again about how critical the current times are for America. Because I believe that so profoundly, I have helped form Free and Strong America PAC to promote conservative policies and candidates. Senator McCain’s presidential campaign is at the top of the list.

I haven’t been sitting on my hands these last few months, nor do I intend to do so. I have spoken at GOP events from Nevada to Pennsylvania to Maine. Ann and I are raising funds for key campaigns across the country. This PAC will enable us to keep fighting for the causes and candidates that will strengthen American values.


I joined that PAC this morning Sara. (Well, if joining means getting on the mailing list)

I like Romney, too. On the issue of the Massachusetts universal healthcare mess, enough time may have passed so that he can credibly say that the legislature and Deval Patrick messed it up. He also might be able to say that the MA experience proves that healthcare can't put left to government to provide.

Times is reporting that James Johnson has been retained as BO's VP adviser. He was the guy who picked Edwards for Kerry and Thomas Eagleton for McGovern. Hope he works his magic again.

That's what I'm hoping, Sweetie.

I think Mondale is going to help. I was thinking that is also a good choice.

Like GMax, I think Michael Steele is an excellent choice. I have been beating his drum for a while, and believe he has some real plusses for McC.

He is a better speaker and debater than BHO and, with the publicity attached to a national candidacy, will objectively impress a sizeable number of people who need to be impressed for McCain to win.

He is an "authentic" African American which may reduce somewhat the 99-1 AA vote without someone like him on the ticket. It also removes any sting from the BHO argument "you are 'racist' for attacking me".

Every little bit counts in an election like this.

He is more conservative on some gut-level issues than McCain. That provides help on McC's right flank -- another place where he needs votes.

He is young (but a bit older than BHO) and energetic. Because of BHO's inexperience, the Dems can't make too much of Steele's.

It would mean, though, that McC will have to have a well thought out message when attacking BHO's inexperience. This means continuing to question BHO's policy choices which are for the most part directly contrary to McCain's.

C'mon - he needs Schrum and Estrich on board to really go out with a whimper.

A very old friend of mine (30 years) called this morning to tell me she is abandoning both Hillary and her fallback Barack. This is amazing. She is a rabid feminist and, to my knowledge, has been a straight ticket Democrat. She says she is now going to vote for McCain.

Is it McCain's service to the country, his voting record, his issue positions as a presidential candidate that swayed her to the "other side?" Nah.

She found out this morning that one of the loves of her life, Don Henley of the Eagles, is endorsing McCain.

Democrats. Their brains are just not wired right. Logic quite often baffles them. But if it takes Don Henley to sway some, then put on "There Aint No Way to Hide Your Lying Eyes".

Hey, Sara, we'll take 'em any way we can get 'em. Any port in a storm. And speaking of a storm, Henley and his boys just missed a tornado the other night while doing a gig in nearby Alpharetta, GA. It missed them by a mile or so and the show went on.

One of my favorite songs is "Get Over It". It is great on so many levels. It was especially useful when my wife or one of my teenaged daughters got vocally perturbed with me. I would put that cut on the CD player and turn it up as loud as it would go. Brought peace to the family, I tell ya. And usually laughter from the perturbed offender.

My brother gave me the job and now my wife can have it.

Term limits. These things won't leave unless they are torn from the chairs. 10 people could have served while Kennedy took costody.

Term limits.

Unconstitutional:

If the qualifications set forth in the text of the Constitution are to be changed, that text must be amended.

John Gizzi of Human Events had a good piece on Steele a couple of weeks ago. A sample:

Any talk with Michael Steele inevitably gets around to Obama, whose historic candidacy sparks suggestions that McCain consider an African-American as a running mate. What does he think of Obama?.

"Umm, I’ll describe Barack the way he described me when he came to Maryland to campaign against me in my race for the U.S. Senate," he replies with a laugh. "He’s an affable fellow, probably would make a good senator, but his resume’s a little thin for the job."

Here's a NY Times profile from 2006 which has this to say of his business experience*:

Steele, who is 47, had no personal fortune to offer up to the cause, no campaign war chest. He had been an associate in a law firm, then left that job to open a consulting firm that struggled.

Wikipedia:

He worked as a corporate securities associate attorney at the Washington, D.C. office of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton. From 1991 to 1997, Steele specialized in financial investments for Wall Street underwriters, working at Cleary’s Tokyo, Japan office focusing on major product liability litigation and at its London office on corporate matters. Steele left the law firm and founded the Steele Group, a business and legal consulting firm.

If true, all that overseas work experience makes him highly qualified to be President under the Obama standard. He didn't just drop in for the CIA briefings and factory tours.
_______________
*Wikipedia has more but the section on Steele's finances is unsourced. Caveat lector.

I am somewhat more encouraged by McCain's chances. I live in a very liberal suburb of NY and my college age son and every single one of his friends are Obamanaics. However, the other night when I forced him to listen to Fox by serving dinner at the same time, he commented that BO's plan to meet with A'jad et all was "dopey." He said he wasn't as sure about BO. Is there hope for a change of heart?

kim,

My apologies for forgetting to mention in my post yesterday that you have long prophesied that Lieberman will be McCain's running mate.

Please pick Crist. Florida has had enough of this joker. Maybe a twofer in the making? Republicans rid of McCain and Floridians rid of Crist ... Yah...

The comments to this entry are closed.

Amazon






Traffic

Wilson/Plame