Pete Yost of the AP covers the cover-up of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge archives described yesterday by Stanley Kurtz at NRO:
WASHINGTON – The University of Illinois on Tuesday refused to release records relating to Barack Obama's service to a nonprofit group linked to former 1960s radical activist William Ayers.
The university's Chicago campus said the donor of the records that document the work of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge has not yet turned over ownership rights to the material.
The university is "aggressively pursuing" an agreement with the donor, and as soon as an agreement is finalized, the collection will be made accessible to the public, the university said in a one-paragraph statement.
There was no indication when an agreement will be worked out. The university did not identify the donor who it said was concerned that the release not invade personal privacy.
Since the mainstream media has never yet reported on this Ayers/Obama link the typical reader is probably scratching his or her head. Mr. Yost provides some background:
Ayers is an education professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago who in his youth co-founded the Weatherman organization, later known as the Weather Underground Organization, which espoused violence as a necessity for political change.
In the 1990s, Ayers was instrumental in starting the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was awarded nearly $50 million by a foundation to help reform Chicago schools.
Obama was the first chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge and Republicans have been highlighting his ties to Ayers through the group.
The Republican National Committee posted the National Review article on the RNC's Web site.
...
Obama was board chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge for three years starting in 1995 and he remained on the board until the project closed in 2001.
The $49.2 million was the largest private gift ever made to Chicago schools. The money went to 250 schools in one of the nation's largest school districts.
That is almost like reporting. Yost makes no mention of the fact that Obama was asked about Ayers at the Philadelphia debate in April and described him as ""a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who's a professor of English in Chicago...", rather than as "a guy I worked with on education reform for six years without accomplishing anything" (The Chicago Annenberg Challenge was ultimately judged a failure by the Annenberg Foundation.)
Yost makes no mention of the fact that the Obama website produced a "Fact Check" on the Obama/Ayers relationship which made no mention of this failed collaboration on education reform.
Yost makes no mention of the fact that previously the Obama campaign was telling reporters that (a) Obama and Ayers met through kids who went to the same school, or (b) Obama and Ayers first met in the second half of 1995 when Ayers hosted a campaign kick-off for Obama. Since Obama became chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge in January 1995, that was false.
In fact, its almost as if the Obama campaign has tried to conceal this Obama/Ayers relationship. And now some mysterious unnamed donor is continuing the cover-up by sitting on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge archives.
And Yost almost reports on it.
So what does it mean? Well, none of us can judge the relationship at this point since a lot of possibly important information is being concealed. But the fact of an ongoing cover-up might spark some journalist's curiosity.
And why the cover-up? My guess is that the Obama campaign recognizes that education reform is a hot topic with voters everywhere. Obama, the man with limited executive experience, might not want to highlight his executive belly-flop here, undertaken in partnership with a hard left unrepentant domestic terrorist. But that is just a guess.
NO MAOIST LEFT BEHIND: One of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge grants was to former student radical Mike Klonsky. More awkwardness.
EVERYBODY INTO THE POOL: Credit where due - at least Mr. Yost noted the story. Take a guess as to whether we will see coverage in the paper or blog at the WaPo, the NY Times, and the LA Times. I say zero for six. But enterprising researchers can find lots of links to background articles in this old post.
GUESS AGAIN: OK, you're a highly paid Obama media consultant - what strategy do you recommend?
(a) Continued stonewall.
(b) Selective release to a few friendly reporters (pardon my redundancy) twenty minutes prior to the VP announcement; then next week and for the next two months, chant "Old news. We have answered those questions. Distraction. Hope. Change."
(c) Confess everything, including the Ayers disposal of Jimmy Hoffa.

BRAVO, TM
Posted by: bad | August 19, 2008 at 06:34 PM
it' kind of like the Edwards story
they report on why they didn't cover it, and think they are reporting.
Posted by: windansea | August 19, 2008 at 06:35 PM
Well, I've suspected for a while that the CAC, as actually implimented, was simply a way for Ayers to funnel lots of money to his "social justice teaching" friends and grad students, so they could earn a comfortable living without having to do the hard work of actually teaching. Maybe that is what the donor is afraid will be confirmed.
Posted by: Ranger | August 19, 2008 at 06:50 PM
Is this the same Mike Klonsky who was formerly Obama's Education Blogger who is now presumably under the bus?
Posted by: bad | August 19, 2008 at 06:59 PM
What bad said.
Posted by: Elliott | August 19, 2008 at 07:20 PM
I like the way the Weather Underground "espoused" violence. How about "committed" violence?
But I won't be choosy. At least the story is getting some coverage.
Posted by: MayBee | August 19, 2008 at 07:23 PM
Yeah, same guy. I'm bookmarking Global Labor. That guy has more info on Obama in Chicago than anyone else I've seen. As TM notes, he owns the story.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | August 19, 2008 at 07:31 PM
bad & Elliott-
Is this the same Mike Klonsky who was formerly Obama's Education Blogger who is now presumably under the bus?
Yes. LGF a few weeks back was tracking the piss poor management, security holes, and seeming lack of editorial oversight at Obama's website. He hasn't done a Obama campaign website post in a while, but was keeping tabs of all the pages that were disappeared, Klonsky's among them.
Posted by: RichatUF | August 19, 2008 at 07:31 PM
"a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who's a professor of English in Chicago..."
Every time I read this phrase it reminds me of that song they used to sing on Sesame Street;
--Who are the people in your neighborhood,
In your neighborhood,
In your neeeiiighborrrhood,
Yes, who are the people in your neighborhood,
They're the people that you meet,
When you're walking down your street,
They're the unrepentant terrorists.--
Posted by: Barney Frank | August 19, 2008 at 07:38 PM
LOL, Barney.
I'm thinking Hillary is gonna be VP, cuz the One is tanking in the polls.
And if McCain picks Lieberman, I ain't voting.
Posted by: centralcal | August 19, 2008 at 07:47 PM
One of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge grants was to former Weatherman Mike Klonsky. More awkwardness.
I don't think this is right. Klonsky knew some of the Weathermen, he was a key guy in SDS, a Maoist, and surely someone the Obama campaign doesn't especially want to be associated with, but I don't think he was a Weatherman:
More from Wikipedia:
However objectionable his Mao sympathies may have been, it doesn't look like he was involved in violent terrorism in the U.S. the way the Weathermen were.
Almost like reporting, indeed, TM!
Posted by: Foo Bar | August 19, 2008 at 07:51 PM
Rich
Is it the same Mike Klonsky in this Wiki page being considered for deletion?
LUN
Posted by: bad | August 19, 2008 at 07:55 PM
The Weather Underground's stated purpose was the revolutionary overthrow of the United States government and were considered too extreme by the Maoists (US chapter) in 1969. This from Wikipedia. I wish I had the time to access their original manifestos. I'd say they were a lot more than simply espousing violence. They were committed to a revolution on the scale of November 1918 and were luckily held in check by their marginal philosophy and law enforcement. In other world, the scum of the earth. I get seriously ticked off every time I see a terrorist with a bomb, and Bill Ayers and his bitch were the 1969 equivalent of our buddy Osama.Sorry for the anger, but this kind has caused some serious agony in our world.That the media has done its best to ignore the story really upsets me. At least Wright is pretty much a blowhard. These people were serious, and only their own stupidity and dumb luck on the part of law enforcement prevented them from killing a lot more people than they did.
Posted by: matt | August 19, 2008 at 07:56 PM
However objectionable his Mao sympathies may have been, it doesn't look like he was involved in violent terrorism in the U.S. the way the Weathermen were.
Either way I still suspect the wheels on the bus are about to go round and round on our little Maoist.
Posted by: Barney Frank | August 19, 2008 at 08:06 PM
I agree with Bad - Bravo, TM. Of course when you get picked up there will be no shortage of trolls swirling around. Ahhh The price of fame.
Posted by: Jane | August 19, 2008 at 08:09 PM
It's obvious that there is such a vast difference between the domestic terrorist Ayers and the peace loving head of the Maoist Communist party Klonsky that the $175,000 grant steered by Ayers to Klonsky was an act of revenge on Ayers' part. He wanted to highlight the fact that Klonsky was no better a communist than Ayers himself. Both could be rented for the right price - just like Obama.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | August 19, 2008 at 08:09 PM
From Weatherman Wiki:
I feel sooo much better that Obama was giving money to a communist rather than a terrorist. And this communist is still active in education.
Posted by: bad | August 19, 2008 at 08:13 PM
Klonsky got his grant of $175,000 in 1995. Check this out from Alexander Russo evaluating the failure of Chicago's Annenberg challenge:
LUN
Posted by: bad | August 19, 2008 at 08:21 PM
Hmmm... if I were a highly paid media consultant for this to help Obama? Lets see... ask Rezko to have the Ayers problem 'solved' in return for a pardon at the end of an Obama Administration?
Then act shocked when that is uncovered!
Those weren't the crooks and terrorists Obama knew!
Posted by: ajacksonian | August 19, 2008 at 08:27 PM
I did not realize that Rezko's partner when he talked Obama into coming to Chicago was Farrakhan's son.
Sorry, that's a bit O/T.
Who are Obama's normal friends?
Posted by: MayBee | August 19, 2008 at 08:33 PM
bad-
same guy.
Posted by: RichatUF | August 19, 2008 at 08:35 PM
I feel sooo much better that Obama was giving money to a communist rather than a terrorist. And this communist is still active in education.
Yeah, especially since communist KGBer Putin is trying his damnedest to start WWIII and reconstitute that "illustrious" bastion of communism, the Soviet Union. Timing is everything.
All those educated kids are now running the Obama campaign or voting for the One, totally clueless to what they have gotten themselves into.
Posted by: Sara | August 19, 2008 at 08:36 PM
Is this an example of Obama's ability to transcend differences?
Posted by: bad | August 19, 2008 at 08:40 PM
I feel sooo much better that Obama was giving money to a communist rather than a terrorist.
Right bad.
There's a term used with chemical weapons called persistence. It refers to a chemical agent's "stickiness", or capacity to linger and cause lasting effects.
The term "communist" evokes images of conspiracy to undermine democracy from the inside, whereas "terrorist" evokes more directly confrontational images. Conspiracy and sneakiness play more into people's uncertainly of The One's unknown-ness.
Thus to refer to someone in Obamessiah's circle as a long time "communist" is a more persistent attack.
I encourage the Cultists to downgrade Ayers, et. al., to "communists" every chance they get.
Posted by: Soylent Red | August 19, 2008 at 08:44 PM
The real irony is that the current crop of Russian oligarchs are ideology-free.
Posted by: JM Hanes | August 19, 2008 at 08:56 PM
JMH:
Unless you count ruthless greed as an ideology.
Posted by: Soylent Red | August 19, 2008 at 08:58 PM
I'm sorry, but Obama will not allow any of you racist liars to portray him as against good schools in Chicago.
Posted by: PaulL | August 19, 2008 at 08:58 PM
Soylent;
I would beg to differ. Lenin and the Bolsheviks were terrorists, and this was a popular thread within the far left during the late 60's. Most of it was drug induced, but the Weather Underground was dead serious. Remember the town house they blew up in Greenwich Village? reminded me of a lot of the clowns in Iraq and Afghanistan who don't seen to remember that explosives are dangerous. This what we used to call God's sense of humor. Ayers and Dohrn deserved 10-15 as far as I'm concerned. They were building nail bombs. Very nasty stuff.
Posted by: matt | August 19, 2008 at 09:02 PM
Exactly. Which would expose Obama for the lefty he probably secretly is.
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | August 19, 2008 at 09:09 PM
Why Stanley Kurtz?
That is, why is it left to conservative writers like Kurtz to dig up these records? Where is our much-vaunted, highly-trained, handsomely-paid super-professional Attack Poodle Media? Why, they're waiting to be spoon-fed their next press release from the Teleprompter Man's campaign.
If a Republican co-chaired the Scaife Foundation with an unrepentant abortion-clinic bomber, do you think the press would be sleepwalking like they are here? No, they would trample their own grandmothers to get theior hands on those files.
John McCain should directly challenge the Book-Banning Librarians to stop Censoring For Obama.
Posted by: Noel | August 19, 2008 at 09:14 PM
So, let's review...
1. Obama's Church "damns" America,
2. as Chairman and lead Director of a multi-million foundation focused on "reforming" education, he did not achieve anything of note.
3. He is barely three years into his junior term as an Illinois Senator with no record to speak of (except a host of not-present votes).
4. He has dark skin, and looks good in a speedo.
5. He associates with a "who's who" of Leftist agitators who espouse, and in some cases, practice delivering terror attacks to American civilians.
6. He is 'kinda' Muslim - he doesn't have both feet in the Ummah, but his advocacy-stew of militant Black Liberation Theology, crypto-Marxist statism, and queer anti-Americanism puts him soundly on the Ummah's Christmas-card list.
7. And the Democrat(ic)s want him to be the next President of the United States of America.
This is a resume that only Al Qaida could love. Geez.
Folks, can we get serious soon? Events are pushing at the gates and we need clear heads in charge for the next eight years.
Crimeny!
-Steve
Posted by: steveaz | August 19, 2008 at 09:27 PM
More info on the failure of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge:
HMMMMMMM... I wonder why an education foundation run by a former community organizer mostly confined funding to community organizations?
Posted by: bad | August 19, 2008 at 09:34 PM
HMMMMMMM... I wonder why an education foundation run by a former community organizer mostly confined funding to community organizations?
Posted by: bad | August 19, 2008 at 09:34 PM
Because they are the ones who are organized at the local level to get out the votes when the "former community organizer" decides to run for office (or re-election).
I am beginning to re-asses my view of the CAC. Maybe it was more of a $50M donation to Obama's future political career, with a little thrown in on the side for Ayers' "social justice teaching" friends.
Posted by: Ranger | August 19, 2008 at 09:43 PM
Re the education foundation: What kind of tax status does it carry? 501C(3)? Does the IRS monitor and/or audit groups like this? Wonder where all of that money went?
Posted by: Joan | August 19, 2008 at 09:46 PM
Any similarity to Gerald Nicola's research on the VVAW which dissappeared after Scot Camil's role in the "Phoenix" plan to
'bring the war home" and Kerry's own ' voting present' position at the Kansas City enclave, effectively a war council to take out war supporters like Sen. Stennis, Thurmond, et al; and subsequent resignation.
Klonsky or Ayers, that's like Comandante
Gonzalo of the Shining Path, or the more moderate MRTistas like Nestor Cerpa, Khmer Rouge or Viet Cong; who do you root for. The
key part is Obama had ties to both, in the Greater Chicago area. Both were playing Marighela's urban guerilla strategy with their trust funds, Ayer's Con Ed ties, along with Oughton's old line real estate ties.Another failure of COINTELPRO's finely polished 'jackboots'. Yes I'm aware the Crips and the Bloods feud, arose in part from the Ron "United Slaves" Karenga, the godfather of Kwanza,and "Bunchy" Carter's Black Panthers. You couldn't make this up if you tried, and why would one want to. This insanity which thankfully wasn't
repeated at Occidental or Columbia in the 80s; is what Obama feels he missed out on. And we get to go on his trek back 'down the good ole days' Well SDS is still around; I read it in the Times Sunday Education supplement, it must be true! The cold reality, is that this round robin doesn't stop even when Obama is defeated. They'll probably turn to irregular action groups with names out of hip hop or alternative bands; Dylan won't cut it, this time. The
resurgence of the black bloc anarchists of Seattle,repeating in Prague, Rome, a dozen other sites is a troubling omen. The Ron Paul/Gravel/Kucinich fringe fed with the
'blood libel' of trutherism, should have died a quiet death, but hopes are rarely fulfilled that easily.
Posted by: narciso | August 19, 2008 at 09:46 PM
Ranger
Maybe some of the CAC money did go to education. (Klonsky's) One of the previously linked articles says Klonsky was a cab driver in 1995 when he received his $175,000 grant. The website LUN says he is now a doctor, presumably of the educational variety.
Posted by: bad | August 19, 2008 at 09:49 PM
Joan,
They file a tax return. Which is subject to public scrutiny.
Posted by: Sue | August 19, 2008 at 09:53 PM
Well Matt I'm not arguing what Lenin and the Bolsheviks were.
I'm simply pointing out that referring to Ayres as a "terrorist", a term that the opposition can claim is hyperbole based on the number of innocent people he actually killed, will elicit less of a response from the electorate than referring to him as a "communist". We've already seen that line of reasoning floated by O-trolls.
The communist tag is much more difficult to weasel out from under, and plays much more harshly against the general misgivings surrounding Obamessiah.
Unfortunately both terms apply in this case.
Posted by: Soylent Red | August 19, 2008 at 09:58 PM
From what I know about university libraries and archives, I don't think that the special collection librarian at UIC is necessarily the reason why the records became suddenly unavailable. The levers being pulled are at a much higher level. However, she may have alerted the higher ups to Kurtz's investigation.
If she was asking a higher-up an honest question like "we don't have a signed deed of gift, can I let this guy see the records?" that would be conscientious and perfectly reasonable. But if she called up saying "hey, this NR guy is snooping around, just thought you should know" then that would not be kosher according to the unofficial code of confidentiality among librarians, which is that it's none of our business who wants to know what - it's our business to provide access to the info if we are legally allowed/required to do so.
It's an odd situation, for sure.
Posted by: Porchlight | August 19, 2008 at 10:02 PM
Thanks, Sue.
Re: Obama was the first chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge and Republicans have been highlighting his ties to Ayers through the group.
So, did Obama receive remuneration for his chairmanship? Was it just public-spirited donation of his time?
So far, all I'd been thinking about re the Annenberg Challenge had been the terrorist who plotted bombings and stomped on our flag. Hadn't been thinking about all of that money.
Posted by: Joan | August 19, 2008 at 10:10 PM
Joan
It was the money angle which finally moved NYT to do a story on John Edwards.
Posted by: bad | August 19, 2008 at 10:14 PM
I also think that this is much more than just a cover up of Obama's relationship with Ayers. Clearly, the CAC failed. The question is, how central to that failure was Obama?
Did it fail because his priorities as chairman pushed money to his old friends in the "community organization" community?
Was the poor relationship with the Chicago school board because Obama was not able to earn the board's trust?
Maybe Obama saw the position of chairman as just a resume enhancer, and did very little. If so, was that the understanding of those who agreed to his placement in that position?
Why did he step down from the chairmanship halfway through the project?
The answers to these questions should be in those files.
Posted by: Ranger | August 19, 2008 at 10:21 PM
"That dang fool thing in the Caucasus, reminds of the opening credits to the nuclear mutiny tale; Crimson Tide; which ultimately was to over written, 6 screen writers plus Tarantino; which evinced a strong contempt for Clinton era civil military relations; although Denzel's character gets the best arguments, just like Cruise in "A Few Good Men"
href
The referred towns are in Dagestan villages, bordering Azerbaijan
"CD #1
2
00:01:03,080 --> 00:01:06,120
This is Richard Valeriani
reporting live...
3
00:01:06,160 --> 00:01:08,760
for CNN from the French
aircraft carrier Foch...
4
00:01:08,840 --> 00:01:11,000
somewhere in the Mediterranean.
5
00:01:11,080 --> 00:01:13,520
Six days ago,
as the rebellion in Chechnya...
6
00:01:13,600 --> 00:01:16,280
spread to the neighboring Caucasus
republics, the Russian president...
7
00:01:16,360 --> 00:01:19,600
ordered massive bombing strikes
against rebel positions...
8
00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:22,360
around Rutul and Belokany.
9
00:01:22,440 --> 00:01:26,240
Appalled at the loss of human life,
the President of the United States...
10
00:01:26,320 --> 00:01:29,000
joined by the French president
and the British prime minister...
11
00:01:29,040 --> 00:01:31,920
suspended all foreign aid
to Russia.
12
00:01:31,960 --> 00:01:34,840
Ultranationalist leader
Vladimir Radchenko...
13
00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:37,960
denounced the U.S. Pressure
as an act of war...
14
00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:40,520
against the Russian Republic
and Russian sovereignty.
15
00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:43,800
Denouncing his own president
as a U.S. Puppet...
16
00:01:43,880 --> 00:01:48,120
he called on the Russian people
to join him in revolt.
17
00:01:48,200 --> 00:01:51,480
He said, "This brutish and hypocritical
American intervention...
18
00:01:51,560 --> 00:01:53,440
will not go unanswered."
19
00:01:53,520 --> 00:01:56,520
On Tuesday, at 10:00
in the morning Moscow time...
20
00:01:56,600 --> 00:02:01,080
the Russian parliament was suspended
and martial law was declared.
21
00:02:01,160 --> 00:02:03,560
With the government in crisis,
the Russian Republic...
22
00:02:03,640 --> 00:02:07,440
was entering into what can only
be described as a state of civil war.
23
00:02:07,480 --> 00:02:10,760
Then yesterday at dawn,
Radchenko and rebel forces...
24
00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:14,280
seized the region around Vladivostok,
including a naval base...
25
00:02:14,320 --> 00:02:17,480
and a nuclear missile base
housing Russian ICBMs.
26
00:02:17,520 --> 00:02:23,080
As regular Russian military forces
move in to encircle Radchenko...
27
00:02:23,120 --> 00:02:26,520
allied military forces
are in a state of high alert.
28
00:02:26,600 --> 00:02:28,680
These French planes
taking off behind me...
29
00:02:28,720 --> 00:02:32,320
have been deployed near the Caucasus
since the beginning of the crisis...
30
00:02:32,400 --> 00:02:35,360
and a crisis which started
in the Caucasus
31
00:02:35,440 --> 00:02:37,080
has now spread to the Far East...
32
00:02:37,160 --> 00:02:41,280
and appears to be turning into the worst
standoff since the Cuban missile crisis.
33
00:02:42,560 --> 00:02:45,600
This is Richard Valeriani
reporting live for CNN...
34
00:02:45,680 --> 00:02:48,880
from the French aircraft carrier Foch,
somewhere in the Mediterranean.
35
00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:57,360
Posted by: narciso | August 19, 2008 at 10:23 PM
We should be able to narrow down the possibilities of who had the Chicago Annenberg Challenge Documents. If I recall correctly, it was nine individuals at the head of the group. Time to do some dumpster diving.
Posted by: bad | August 19, 2008 at 10:23 PM
I'll have to tune in again, tomorrow, for the next exciting episode of "As Obama turns." 'Night all!
Posted by: sbw | August 19, 2008 at 10:23 PM
From Wiki:
All of the $49.2 million of the grant was awarded which implies that an aditional $100 million was raised privately. So we are talking at least $150 million spent on a venture that failed.
Posted by: bad | August 19, 2008 at 10:37 PM
'Night, sbw!
bad, Steve Diamond is curious about Stanley Ikenberry, CAC boardmember and currently Regent Professor and President Emeritus of the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign) College of Education.
Posted by: Porchlight | August 19, 2008 at 10:45 PM
Why do you guys say the CAC failed? I'd be surprised if any of us know what its objectives were, or whether they were achieved. It certainly doesn't seem to have failed Obama.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 19, 2008 at 10:57 PM
We need to post little tidbits of info about Obama, Ayers and The Chicago Annenberg Challenge and links so the newsie types who troll looking for a story have something to work with. There is bound to be an aspiring Woodward or Bernstein looking for red meat.
Posted by: bad | August 19, 2008 at 11:17 PM
Right on Ex...
The assumption here is that CAC was about improving schools, rather than improving bank accounts.
When it comes to most things inside Chicago politics, that's usually a bad assumption.
Posted by: Soylent Red | August 19, 2008 at 11:33 PM