Today's Photo Du Jour
The photo du jour comes from Baghdad by way ot the Times and Karim Kadim of the AP:
And the caption:
Iraqi policemen danced with a United States Army soldier in Baghdad on Sunday, the day Iraq’s cabinet approved a security pact.
As Bush has said for years, when the Iraqis shake it up we will shake it down. Story here.


What a great photo!
Posted by: centralcal | November 17, 2008 at 09:11 AM
"Several political analysts" are already giving Obama credit for winning the war, according to the article. Right on cue.
Posted by: Lori | November 17, 2008 at 09:23 AM
This might put a crimp on Obama's January 21st, 2009 surrender plans.
Posted by: Perfect Sense | November 17, 2008 at 09:56 AM
Did anyone read the Washington Post ombudsman article yesterday? It seems that yes, they were liberal and unbalanced this election season but that is only because they need to hire more conservative journalists and do better editing. So no problem. Sorry for the biased reporting. That was essentially it. So now they are trying to regain credibility and make these admissions that everyone knows anyway but only AFTER they have managed to get their guy elected. They must think we are incredibly stupid to swallow that.
Posted by: bio mom | November 17, 2008 at 10:08 AM
It seems that yes, they were liberal and unbalanced this election season
And in other news, the sun rose in the east this morning.
Sometime in early 2009 we will also read that, yes, the media was unfair to President Bush, and that coverage of the Iraq war was one-sided, and sorry about that, they'll try not to let it happen again.
Posted by: jimmyk | November 17, 2008 at 10:32 AM
Yeah, how about that, bio mom. They goofed! But they mean well. Wasn't that the excuse for Al Gore's Bhuddist temple fund-raising, and Sandy Berger's document stuffing? And now Hansen's October temperature data. Ah, those lovable bumblers and fumblers on the left. Gotta love 'em.
The only way to look at the MSM is as enemies -- enemies who need to be defeated, and not by strategies which depend on their cooperation.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 17, 2008 at 10:43 AM
What does it mean, exactly? If the Iraqis cannot manage and ask us to extend, do you suppose we won't? If they can take over more of the job more quickly, do you suppose they'd object to a request by us to remove more troops more quickly?
It seems to me more symbol than substance, but the symbolism is not minor. What other country in the history of the world has ever been less desirous of creating an empire?
Posted by: clarice | November 17, 2008 at 10:44 AM
It's important to remember that there is a better that average chance that every Iraqi in this picture would be dead if we had listened to the President Elect's wisdom.
Posted by: Soylent Red | November 17, 2008 at 10:47 AM
"Sometime in early 2009 we will also read that"
You can read it, I won't be reading it. Unless it's on the AP feed from Rome, NY. I'm starting my New Year resolution a little early. No clicks to trash, no revenue, not even the .000001 cent per click to keep crap outfits like the NYT, the Tribune or the WaPo breathing for half a millisecond longer.
The country will be healthier with the propaganda organs properly dead and I intend to do my part to see that they become "good" media as soon as possible.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | November 17, 2008 at 10:55 AM
What's so great about the AP feed from Rome, NY? My impression is that the AP is just as capable of slanting their news coverage as the most eager staff reporters of the NYT, LAT, and WAPO.
Posted by: jimmyk | November 17, 2008 at 11:03 AM
I didn't see a way to customize the Rome Sentinel feed, but another possible good source is myway.com, with a fully customizable home page, access to AP, Fox, and others (MSNBC & NYT I think, but I don't use). The company is owned by IAC Search & Media, who also own ask.com and reference.com.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 17, 2008 at 11:13 AM
Michael called into the Dennis Miller radio show last week from Baghdad. Miller asked him if it was true we were winning the war, and Yon said it's way past winning, it's over. The patrols are boring.
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | November 17, 2008 at 11:20 AM
Make that Michael Yon.
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | November 17, 2008 at 11:21 AM
bio mom-
I'm trying to look at upside all day-it's the optimist in me. In regards to Iraq, the worldwide media coverage of eminent US defeat pushed the Ummah to fight that much harder, committing most of its resources to the fight, and they still lost. With the media's rent boy in office, they will be less anxious to print anything which will blow back on the US and will dial back greatly the retreat and defeat narrative they were trying to perfect. It will buy us some time before the law enforcement and tranzi policies of the Obama Administration can work there ill effects. Add in a global recession and collapsing oil prices and the Iran problem might just take care of itself.
Some problems I see in the military side of the GWOT (aside from his committment to an internationalist law enforcement model) will be the coming Obama failure to get NATO and Europe to commit to victory in Afghanistan (I'm doubtful a "surge" of any consequence is going to happen there with Pakistan playing with our supply lines) and a revisit of Somalia and Yemen. YMMV.
Posted by: RichatUF | November 17, 2008 at 11:21 AM
jimmyk,
There's nothing "great" about the AP at all. It does provide "news" (more or less) and it would be unreasonable to suggest that everyone simply stop reading news completely.
Clicking the Rome, NY feed puts that .000001 in the pocket of a publisher who articulates a point of view with which I generally agree. Click the RomeSentinel button at the top, read his editorials and see if you don't agree. If you do agree, why would you put that .000001 cent in Sulzberger's pocket rather than in the pocket of someone with whom you share a POV?
Reading trash tabloids such as the NYT or WaPo is an indication of a weak mind (IMO). It's like watching Oprah or Jerry Springer.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | November 17, 2008 at 11:35 AM
While I hate to take issue with Dear Leader, Caro's got the indisputable photo du jour. Our own Fearless Jane puts McCain's Straight Talk Express to shame -- and gets all the guys too. We've gotchyer pins & dolls & screws right here:
Eat your heart out Clarice!
Posted by: JM Hanes | November 17, 2008 at 11:44 AM
Yippee!!!!!!
Posted by: Jane | November 17, 2008 at 11:55 AM
Oh. No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am disconsolate! Where are those dolls again!
Posted by: clarice | November 17, 2008 at 11:59 AM
Clarice, are you gonna stand still for this?
I thought it was gonna be mud wrestling that determined the winner, not who went on a cruise first. lol.
Posted by: centralcal | November 17, 2008 at 12:01 PM
She is a damned cheat, isn't she? Our dear sweet Jane.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTtpDwrKaxo
Posted by: clarice | November 17, 2008 at 12:05 PM
Ha ha ha ha ha!
Posted by: MayBee | November 17, 2008 at 12:10 PM
Best Thread Evah!
More, please!
Posted by: hit and run | November 17, 2008 at 12:24 PM
OT, but from the Rome Sentinel's #1 competitor (the Utica Observer-Dispatch)...I meant to post this the other day on the Prop 8 thread but hey, while we're talking about Upstate NY...(LUN)
Posted by: NewYorkCentral | November 17, 2008 at 12:34 PM
You're just a babe in the woods, Clarice.
Posted by: JM Hanes | November 17, 2008 at 12:48 PM
Tee Hee!
Oh and Clarice - my buddy Mark signed the sign and wrote (uncoached): "It's the truth".
Double Tee Hee!
Posted by: Jane | November 17, 2008 at 12:50 PM
Drudge had this up about Obama sending letters to federal workers. from WAPO:
Unfortunately, there are no financial figures to estimate the cost of all these promises.
LUN
Posted by: bad | November 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM
I'm sure that the Utica Observer-Dispatch has many fine points but all roads still lead to Rome.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | November 17, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Obamas' using Americans for Foreign aid and the pay off.
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Politics/comments?type=story&id=6269682
Posted by: DE | November 17, 2008 at 12:56 PM
More, please!
Couldn't have said it better. And good afternoon, JMH.
Posted by: Elliott | November 17, 2008 at 01:06 PM
bad- it seems he is going through the budget line by line and finding all sorts of ways to add to it. Using his magic pen, of course.
Posted by: MayBee | November 17, 2008 at 01:22 PM
Speak for yourselves, Elliott and Hit.
Posted by: clarice | November 17, 2008 at 01:23 PM
'Afternoon, Elliott. Afraid I'm having trouble keeping up with the Cruiser Crew who seem to need zero recovery time. Maybe it has something to do with needing a second suitcase for all the equipment I take along when I know I'm only going to have to unpack once. Unfortunately, that means arrival and departure are hell on wheels, so to speak. In the new upside down world of air travel, your lightweight stuff goes into your suitcase, while you carry the all the really heavy gear from one distant gate to another on your back. I'd bet that all the new weight limits on baggage have not materially changed the totals, just the center of gravity.
Posted by: JM Hanes | November 17, 2008 at 01:37 PM
Oh, JMH, Jane & Clarice--you girls are rich!
and make me smile, even on bad days!!
Please, More!
You all are my mental travelers, but it's the wit and satire that kicks!
Posted by: glenda waggoner | November 17, 2008 at 01:38 PM
Michelle out with the gal........
http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=6269615
Posted by: Jamesbond | November 17, 2008 at 01:43 PM
MayBee,
I think Obama will be looking to break the record for promulgating executive orders by several orders of magnitude -- in his first 100 days. Seriously. With nary a "unitary executive" peep from a grateful Democratic choir in Congress, either.
Posted by: JM Hanes | November 17, 2008 at 01:45 PM
JMH,
I'm still exhausted from the trip home, and no one is making demands on me to get out a product, so I sympathize.
Posted by: Jane | November 17, 2008 at 01:47 PM
It would be easier if we could just take a steamer trunk (or two) along.
Posted by: Elliott | November 17, 2008 at 01:50 PM
Today's cause of sinistropherical cris de coeur: Missile defense likely to continue in Obama administration.
Posted by: Elliott | November 17, 2008 at 01:56 PM
centralcal:
"I thought it was gonna be mud wrestling that determined the winner, not who went on a cruise first."
It's not our fault that Clarice didn't show up! People started claiming seats at the Mudwrestling Pit the night before the match, just to make sure they didn't get stuck watching it on TV in the Deep Six Lounge.
Jonah Goldberg tried to get in on the act of course. Here he is, strutting his stuff for the ear muffed JOM Dames, but we were not impressed. Neither was his onstage companion, apparently. When Steyn is in the house, he turns even Jonah's substantial head. You've got potential kid, but for now, best to listen and learn. Last but not least, lest any of you doubters think Jane was jesting, here is the divine Steyn, himself, endorsing Jane's win.
All of the above caught in the act by Caro, of course.
Posted by: JM Hanes | November 17, 2008 at 03:11 PM
It's True! It's True!
Bravo JMH.
I already miss you guys!
Posted by: Jane | November 17, 2008 at 03:22 PM
Jane,
your BFFL is useless today. Even a trip to Target has not reenergized her.
Posted by: Laura | November 17, 2008 at 03:30 PM
Double HUMPH!!! Esp that shot of MS making the sign..I mean who's going to believe that?
(Anyone seen those dmaned dolls and stickpins?)
Posted by: clarice | November 17, 2008 at 03:41 PM
Ummm. I think we "non-cruisers" are being doled out tidbits of info. But the REAL CRUISE ACTION is being hidden in a "What Really Happened On The Cruise Stays On The Cruise" omerta! :-))
Posted by: Thomas Collins | November 17, 2008 at 03:43 PM
Clarice,
If we told you everything we would have to remove you. Fr Sirico's brother can help with that.
Posted by: Laura | November 17, 2008 at 03:49 PM
Why, bless your little heart, Thomas Collins. What a thought!
Alas, I meant to blot out the photo credit, but had a last minute uploading lapse which I'm at a loss to correct. I trust that our upstanding JOM jury will scrupulously disregard the implications, although I'm not entirely sure about Clarice.
Posted by: JM Hanes | November 17, 2008 at 04:00 PM
Rove meetings missing the agencies:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/16/AR2008111602440.html
Posted by: 111644 | November 17, 2008 at 04:01 PM
Thought you all were blondes///Don't tell me there was some fibbing going on?
Posted by: clarice | November 17, 2008 at 04:25 PM
Nope, Clarice - in one of Jane's very first posts after hitting land, she claimed she was the ONLY blonde among the 4 JOMers.
Posted by: centralcal | November 17, 2008 at 04:49 PM
Clarice, only one blonde, and she's a natural!
Posted by: Caro | November 17, 2008 at 04:50 PM
Hot Air has this linked. It's about how Obama will go around the Fairness Doctrine to stifle syndicated talk radio. LUN
Posted by: bad | November 17, 2008 at 04:54 PM