« Krugman On Copenhagen |
| Ignore That Man Behind The Teleprompter! »
Tea baggers on top in a three way.
SINCE YOU ASKED: More news from the gutter - the most famous foursome in golf has to be Tiger Woods and Bill Clinton.
Posted by Tom Maguire on December 07, 2009 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b2aa69e20120a721af4f970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference I'm Waiting For The Video...:
TM, I think the link you intended is in the LUN.
Thomas Collins |
December 07, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Could you not use that term, TM.
December 07, 2009 at 12:22 PM
But the tea baggers are not on top in a three way--per Ras.They're second.
December 07, 2009 at 12:25 PM
WEll they are technically within the margin of error, if the numbers are correct
December 07, 2009 at 12:33 PM
Technically it's right outside the moe, in this hypothetical matchup
December 07, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Pretty amazing numbers. I am not a third party advocate but I hope this at least wakes up the GOP.
Can we please get rid of Steele?
December 07, 2009 at 01:16 PM
Just watch, Dems will run stealth third party candidates to draw votes away from the GOP. They're just that rotten.
December 07, 2009 at 01:23 PM
Well they tried that with Daggett, but he was ultimately unconvincing in that role. Hoffman became the third party because of the idiocy of the local committee, picking
and then reinforcing Scozzofava
December 07, 2009 at 01:30 PM
I still find the term highly offensive.
December 07, 2009 at 01:38 PM
I agree with you about the 3rd party but OTOH I am really getting to the point where I think we need a revolution in this country. And I'd hate to back down because we don't want to dilute the party's impact particularly if it could happen.
And I love the Tea party message - small gvt, low taxes and we don't care about the rest.
December 07, 2009 at 01:40 PM
True, Jane. Something's got to give. Ideally it would be like Reagan winning the battle between the conservative and the liberal wing of the party.
December 07, 2009 at 01:46 PM
But the joke wouldn't work without it.
Charlie (Colorado) |
December 07, 2009 at 01:48 PM
But watch for the Dems to "mudslide"
December 07, 2009 at 02:04 PM
I was just thinking that, and I actually thought I posted it. But I don't see it.
December 07, 2009 at 02:10 PM
Speaking of video, actually following the truth to power thread in the LUN. what do the fashion consultants think, in the LUN
December 07, 2009 at 02:46 PM
If the numbers from Rasmussen Reports are to be believe, the Democrats will have to do a lot more "teabagging" than the Republicans to get a majority in 2010. Unfortunately, for Democrats, they are better at the "mudslide" .. and here they thought they already had the "chocolatey road to heaven."
December 07, 2009 at 02:52 PM
narciso, I always think she dresses appropriately for the occasion, but then Sarah's so beautiful (naturally so) that she'd look good in a hefty bag.
December 07, 2009 at 02:58 PM
all right, why is the link going to a wiki about the US economy? What am I missing?
Bill Peschel |
December 07, 2009 at 03:01 PM
Oh it was a mistake Bill. TC corrected it in the first post.
December 07, 2009 at 03:05 PM
I should have figured that anything with an urban dictionary tag would be disturbing, I didn't realize how much. But I suppose it's an appropriate metaphor
December 07, 2009 at 03:07 PM
We think it's a bad link, Bill--And hello!
December 07, 2009 at 03:08 PM
All right, that was a revolting image, now number # 21, for something completely different, in the LUN
December 07, 2009 at 03:16 PM
Note to any and all JOM females for whom this might apply: If you want any fame from being a Cheetah Woods girlfriend, you better get your name out there quickly.
December 07, 2009 at 03:36 PM
I'm learning lots of urban slang I had no interest in learning.
December 07, 2009 at 03:48 PM
Matt: I'm with you. It is offensive and I'm surprised to see TM use it, joke or not.
Sara (Pal2Pal) |
December 07, 2009 at 03:59 PM
It's a 'these googles do nothin' image seriously,gack, to be very technical about it
December 07, 2009 at 04:06 PM
I can't believe this guy is still in the Administration.
December 07, 2009 at 04:17 PM
I dunno Clarice he seems perfectly suited to this administration.
How long before Glenn Beck gets rid of him?
December 07, 2009 at 04:33 PM
I think I have led a sheltered life. I had no idea what teabagging meant and I would have never guessed what fisting was in a million years. Be careful searching those words. You might be horrified by some images google takes you to.
December 07, 2009 at 04:39 PM
How do you think the WaPo would have played this story in the prior administration? How are they running it now?
December 07, 2009 at 04:41 PM
How charming re: Kevin Jennings. Really there is no end to the appalling things going on in this administration, is there? I mean everywhere you turn - health care, AGW/cap and trade, Afghanistan, ACORN/election fraud, stimulus/Recovery.gov, it goes on and on.
If he is under 50% with the media solidly behind him, just imagine where he'd be if they actually covered this stuff.
December 07, 2009 at 04:51 PM
I just asked Kurtz of the macaca post about this on their website. You might want to ,too. Or the ombudsman or news editor..It really is remarkable.
December 07, 2009 at 04:58 PM
Jane, I just got this picture of Gore meeting with Obama in the WH today. Gore saying (as he writes a note to Obama): "Shhhhh... we still don't know where Monica hid the bugs."
December 07, 2009 at 05:04 PM
I had to explain "fisting" to Amy - which is pretty funny when you think of it. Drudge is reporting Elin has moved out.
December 07, 2009 at 05:06 PM
I had never heard of "teabagging" till this year. Still don't know what "fisting" is and am a little afraid to find out, since I clicked on the "mudslide" link and almost lost my lunch.
I saw that about Elin moving out. My gawd who could blame her?
December 07, 2009 at 05:26 PM
If you have any interest in getting rid of these types (Kevin Jennings)in the Administration, you might want to take a look at Michelle Malkin's list of who is helping promote their agenda.
Here are their listed sponsors:
American Federation of Teachers
Cisco Systems, Inc.
David Bohnett Foundation
Ernst & Young
Evelyn and Walter Haas, Jr. Fund
David Geffen Foundation
George Gund Foundation
Heckscher Foundation for Children
Human Civil Rights Organizations of America: A CFC
International Association of Gay and Lesbian Country Western Dance Clubs
Johnson Family Foundation
Metropolitan Tennis Group, Inc.
National Education Association
New York Community Trust
The Overbrook Foundation
Peter and Carmen Lucia Buck Foundation
Ted Snowdon Foundation
The Streisand Foundation
W. Clement and Jessie V. Stone Foundation
I intend to do every thing I can to insure that not more dime of my money goes to any of those listed.
Last night when I put a post up about Kevin Jennings, someone who I had thought was a conservative poster came up with a sentence about how terrible it was to be upset with the subject. I don't really care what anyone does in their bedroom, what I care about is those in authority exposing my great grandchildren to this garbage long before they need to be.
December 07, 2009 at 05:27 PM
So you are now a very strong believer in the free markets.
That is from an interview of John Stossell at the Daily Beast. I think it is funny he used Palin's catch phrase.
December 07, 2009 at 05:46 PM
Dave (in MA) |
December 07, 2009 at 05:49 PM
the Justice Department has, for now, ordered two key career attorneys not to comply with a subpoena about the case issued by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
December 07, 2009 at 05:50 PM
Why on earth does anyone with a POV that isn't left of Obama agree to write for or be interviewed for The Daily Beast? The comments there are despicable because Stossell is a libertarian (I think Palin is too, for the record).
December 07, 2009 at 05:51 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.