BREAKING: NBC News says Mubarak is stepping down, to be replaced by VP Suleiman.
Nick Kristof gives Team Obama a thumbs-down in Egypt:
President Obama and his aides were blindsided by the crisis from the beginning (as were we in the news media), and I fear that they’ve mishandled it since. When the protests began, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton described Mr. Mubarak’s government as “stable” and “looking for ways to respond to the legitimate needs and interests of the Egyptian people.”
Then our special envoy, Frank Wisner, called for Mr. Mubarak to stay in power, saying: “President Mubarak’s continued leadership is critical.” The White House has tried to backtrack, but it has been backtracking from backtracks so much that on Egypt its symbol might as well be a weather vane.
Uh huh. Team Obama could offer a weathervane as a symbol but it would take them months of polling and focus-grouping to figure out what the weather vane ought to look like. (I picture a donkey with its tail between its legs. Well, among my ideas that are anatomically possible...)
Back to Mr. Kristof:
When well-known journalists like Anderson Cooper of CNN were being beaten up in Tahrir Square, the White House found its voice. But now that foreign reporters are no longer being routinely harassed, it has lost its sense of urgency. “Now” is no longer in the White House lexicon.
"Now" is so yesterday. And has been for a while.
Mr. Kristof closes with a cred-promoting display of erudition:
Many years ago, when I studied Arabic intensively at the American University in Cairo, I was bewildered initially because for the first couple of months I learned only the past tense. That’s the basic tense in Arabic, and so in any Arabic conversation I was locked into the past.
The Obama administration seems equally caught in the past, in ways that undermine the secular pro-Western forces that are Egypt’s best hope. I hope the White House learns the future tense.
Well, they have us tense about the future, if that helps.
Well, they have us tense about the future, if that helps.
A TM instant classic.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 10, 2011 at 11:04 AM
From The Corner-
AJ's Egypt Watch.
Shamelessly swiped, once again.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 10, 2011 at 11:12 AM
It certainly is so is " 'Now' is so yesterday"
Posted by: clarice | February 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM
This comes from a former staffer, for John Kerry, but regardless it seems a good primer, in the LUN
Posted by: narciso | February 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM
I’m still feeling a little pluperfect subjunctive as tenses go.
Posted by: MarkO | February 10, 2011 at 11:25 AM
Does that mean we're scrod?
Posted by: Rick Ballard | February 10, 2011 at 11:27 AM
Talk about a WTF example, he was trained as an Arabist, but the Times sent him to cover
economics, then China, in the LUN
Posted by: narciso | February 10, 2011 at 11:27 AM
Hey--they assigned their restaurant reviewer, Johnny Apple, to cover Iraq.
This is a step up.
By the way, this might explain Kristof's affinity for wilson and Plame.
Posted by: clarice | February 10, 2011 at 11:34 AM
Suleiman seems to have been running all the talks with the opposition, and making all the public statements for the last 10 days or so. It is odd timing for this though.
Posted by: Ranger | February 10, 2011 at 11:42 AM
Need we bring up the CV of the illustrated Mr. Rich?
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 10, 2011 at 11:43 AM
Henninger has an interesting--and pessimistic--assessment of Egypt's future.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | February 10, 2011 at 12:09 PM
Does anybody find it strange that this comes almost immediately after the Saudi offer of help in propping up Mubarak?
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 10, 2011 at 12:11 PM
While the Code Pink "dogs" are in Egypt, I'm watching to see if they will support Mubarak's wife in her campaign *against* female genital mutilation. With 90 percent of Egyptian women victims of the mutilation, the last ten percent must be concerned.
Barry's bungled it again. He should stick to Date Night and his parties.
Posted by: Frau Steingehirn | February 10, 2011 at 12:21 PM
Here's a free link to the Henninger piece:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704858404576134272961150028.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>economic disaster
Posted by: clarice | February 10, 2011 at 12:31 PM
This link works better, in the LUN
Posted by: narciso | February 10, 2011 at 12:36 PM
For some reason all of those links require a log in. At least for me.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vjnjagvet | February 10, 2011 at 12:52 PM
Google Henninger, and find the link,
Posted by: narciso | February 10, 2011 at 01:00 PM
Apologies for linking to a subscriber site.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | February 10, 2011 at 01:07 PM
Does anybody find it strange that this comes almost immediately after the Saudi offer of help in propping up Mubarak?
Didn't that happen on Day 4 of what's now 17? Who leaked that, anyway?
Posted by: Extraneus | February 10, 2011 at 01:07 PM
Yes, the call was reported to have happened Saturday January 29, almost two weeks ago. Incidentally January 30 was the day Obama called for "an orderly transition" of power.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 10, 2011 at 01:09 PM
It really shows they had no clue, and they haven't gotten any better since,
Posted by: narciso | February 10, 2011 at 01:13 PM
Thanks for observing that Porch. Had read that info last night.
An Egyptian was just on a phone call from Egypt to Power Lunch on CNBC and he said the banks there seem to be doing well--as in no big runs and in fact many people were making deposits--at least he said he was.
Posted by: glasater | February 10, 2011 at 01:15 PM
Posted by: Extraneus | February 10, 2011 at 01:15 PM
Uh huh. Team Obama could offer a weathervane as a symbol but it would take them months of polling and focus-grouping to figure out what the weather vane ought to look like.
You don't need a weathervane to know which way our prez blows!
Posted by: Rocco | February 10, 2011 at 01:24 PM
Rush is saying that CNN is denying that Mubarek will step down.
Posted by: Jane (sit on the couch or save your country) | February 10, 2011 at 01:30 PM
glasater-
The overnight rates are saying not quite the same thing, but there is a flight to quality, of sorts.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 10, 2011 at 01:37 PM
this reminds of this passage from Doug Adams;
The Encyclopedia Galactica defines the Marketing Division of the Cirius Cybernetics Corporation as: "A bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes."
Interestingly enough, an edition of the Encyclopedia Galactica that fell through a time-warp from 200 years in the future defines the Marketing Division of the Cirius Cybernetics Corporation as: "A bunch of mindless jerks who were the first against the wall when the revolution came."
Posted by: narciso | February 10, 2011 at 01:42 PM
Thanks for the hint, N. I got it.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vjnjagvet | February 10, 2011 at 01:47 PM
Thanks for the correction, Porch; anything the makes McFly look like more of a destabilizing bumbler is fine with me.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 10, 2011 at 01:48 PM
Thanks for the correction, Porch; anything the makes McFly look like more of a destabilizing bumbler is fine with me.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 10, 2011 at 01:48 PM
I really hope you dont mean that. I can imagine quite a few scenarios that would make Ear Leader look bad, and theyre not for the country.
Posted by: qrstuv | February 10, 2011 at 02:04 PM
LUN is a copy of the Henninger post.
Has anyone read much Jean-Francois Revel? Am reading Last Exit to Utopia and wishing I had known of his work before.
Posted by: rse | February 10, 2011 at 02:07 PM
Well, it appears to be total confusion at the moment. Some sources saying the VP will take over. Others are saying it is going to be the Higher Council of the Armed Forces. Others are saying that Mubarak is just handing over power so he can take medical leave in Germany for treatment.
Posted by: Ranger | February 10, 2011 at 02:10 PM
bumbler == ineffectual
Honduras survived his ineptness and hopefully Egypt will too. Yes it hurts the country's image but so does just about everything the State Dept dips its fingers in over the last 20+ years. If it serves to wake up enough of the 52% into starting to act like responsible adults then maybe it will be worth it in the long run.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 10, 2011 at 02:11 PM
General Clapper seems to be deep into the cherry koolaid, with the Moslem Brotherhood,
'largely secular', SNAFUBAR
Posted by: narciso | February 10, 2011 at 02:15 PM
Yeah, Rush is flogging that mercilessly. Well deserved.
Posted by: Extraneus | February 10, 2011 at 02:19 PM
narc Orwell's body must've set a new RPM record on that howler
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 10, 2011 at 02:19 PM
Here's the LUN, this is the same tripe they had Admiral Blair repeating after the Christmas bombing
Posted by: narciso | February 10, 2011 at 02:20 PM
For those of us of a certain age this is looking more and more like February 1979. Not good. The only good thing about 1979 was that 1980 followed and the country wisely chose Ronald Reagan over Jimmuh. Will the country correct its mistake in 2012?
Posted by: NK | February 10, 2011 at 02:24 PM
Narciso-- thanks for the link. I threw up a bit in my mouth. The only thing worse than Clapper saying this is him actually believing it.
Posted by: NK | February 10, 2011 at 02:26 PM
Here's an article for all you Michelle fashionistas.
Michelle Obama's fabulous $35 frock
What do I know...I'm a flannel shirt kinda guy!
Posted by: Rocco | February 10, 2011 at 02:27 PM
Maybe he misunderstood the question, referring to the protesters at large, there's no way, this could apply to the IM,
Posted by: narciso | February 10, 2011 at 02:32 PM
narc it's a treasure trove of stoopid at Weaselzippers; after Clapper there's Trandrea and Crazy Larry. I could only make it that far before losing faith in just about everything.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 10, 2011 at 02:36 PM
Bolton on Meghan Kelly this second commenting about "The Muslim Brotherhood being largely secular".
Bolton response: "The single most foolish thing any senior intelligence official ever said."
"A very dangerous organization...A real threat..."
We will see video of his response many, many times later today.
Posted by: daddy | February 10, 2011 at 02:44 PM
Rocco- it's a cute enough dress, but I'm tired of Michelle Obama wearing cheap and cheerful to national interviews, and wearing high end designer in the garden.
It's so manipulative.
(ps. I'm also not convinced we need to see the First Lady's under thigh)
Posted by: MayBee | February 10, 2011 at 02:48 PM
Clapper= IT'S REALLY STARTING TO LOOK LIKE 1979. Back then it was Carter's Iran ambassador who claimed Khomeini's return was no threat because Khomeini was --you know -- "like Ghandhi". Pray God, and hope he preserves us and deliver us from these fools.
Posted by: NK | February 10, 2011 at 02:51 PM
Well it's a little different, this is more like the scenario that Gen. Huyser was sent to shortcircuit, back in '78, but it's a lot
like the Old song from the Who "Won't Get Fooled Again"
Posted by: narciso | February 10, 2011 at 03:02 PM
The Muslim Brotherhood is just a group in my neighborhood. Our kids go to school together.
Posted by: The Obama Administration | February 10, 2011 at 03:31 PM
I studied Arabic for a year in Beirut and attest that there is no future tense in Arabic and that the present is denoted by using various versions of the past tense. They, of course, colloquially have ways to indicate futurity, but this is a vast culture rooted in a deep past whose religious roots seem to make a leap to modernity difficult, if not impossible. Two UN studies in 1991 & 2007 have pondered the problem of Arab backwardness, and I think it's rooted in an essential linguistic and cultural conservatism unwilling to make small compromises with its own firmly-believed principles, many of them medieval and counter-intuitive.
With that out of the way, Wisner was a good friend and has the right read, but the Army calls ALL the shots in Egypt. They have several million well-armed members and enough economic clout and slush-fund money to assuage the pain of those who are malleable.
However, any diehards may do precisely that in the streets of Cairo if an attempt at an insurrection is made in Cairo. A broken society is broken once again. The story repeats itself endlessly across the history of the Arab world.
Posted by: daveinboca | February 10, 2011 at 03:38 PM
Maybee
As one of the comments notes...$35 dress and french designed $540 Lanvin sneakers. How thrifty.
Posted by: Rocco | February 10, 2011 at 03:42 PM
@Danube of Thought
I blogged early this AM on the Henninger article which I found outside the subscriber wall. The main body of Dan's piece is in my blog with my half-sleepy comments intersplicing the rich insights Henninger has, especially about the wider ramifications:
http://daveinboca.blogspot.com/2011/02/is-egypt-hopeless.html#links
Posted by: daveinboca | February 10, 2011 at 03:51 PM
Aren;t you glad we consolidated all the intel into one giant service? Now we can effect a one stop cut off of funds and a start up new OSI of about 100 people all exempt from civil service and AA rules.
Posted by: clarice | February 10, 2011 at 03:53 PM
Hey, Dave, great blog. Never checked it out before.
Posted by: Extraneus | February 10, 2011 at 04:02 PM
Yeah nice blog Dave; do you ever talk music there?
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 10, 2011 at 04:16 PM
Mubarack isn't going anywhere. And takes a few shots at the O man.
I was hoping that not having a run on the banks as was predicted elsewhere was a good sign Mel.
Just like a lot of people trying to find some good in all of this mess in Egypt.
Posted by: glasater | February 10, 2011 at 04:20 PM
Who has looked worse in this whole Egyptian thing: Bammy, Muffer or the MFM?
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 10, 2011 at 04:22 PM
Listened to Mubarak's speech on the radio - the crowd sounded angry. I have an ominous feeling about the situation now.
Did you all see that Gov. Jan Brewer is suing the Federal government?
Interesting times we live in.
Posted by: centralcal | February 10, 2011 at 04:26 PM
I've got your blog bookmarked, Dave.
Were you in the Foreign Service during the Iran unpleasantness in the late 70's? What's your take on the similarities and differences between that disaster and the one in Egypt today?
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vjnjagvet | February 10, 2011 at 04:37 PM
Via Jake Tapper:
Jamie Smith, director of the office of public affairs for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence later said in a statement to ABC News:
To clarify Director Clapper’s point - in Egypt the Muslim Brotherhood makes efforts to work through a political system that has been, under Mubarak’s rule, one that is largely secular in its orientation – he is well aware that the Muslim Brotherhood is not a secular organization.”
Posted by: The Obama Administration | February 10, 2011 at 04:44 PM
Oy.
Posted by: MayBee | February 10, 2011 at 04:45 PM
How about that Panetta, huh? Rather than wait things out, he goes down to testify before Congress that "strong likelihood" that Mubarak would step down tonight.
Is that similar to the Muslim Brotherhood being "largely secular"?
What a bunch of clowns.
Posted by: Extraneus | February 10, 2011 at 04:47 PM
For Republicans its always "What did he know and when did he know it."
For Dem's its always "What did he not know and does he have the slightest clue that it might be important to quit being an ignorant moron and get educated?"
Posted by: daddy | February 10, 2011 at 04:53 PM
My head hurts as this all reminds me of the movie, "Mars Attacks."
Muslim Brotherhood: "Ack-Ack."
Posted by: Mike Huggins | February 10, 2011 at 04:59 PM
I find Panetta's words to be perfectly consonant with the administration's adoption of WTF? practice with regard to all policy issues. As the President has always said, "[INSERT] is the basis for my actions today and as surely as night follows day, [INSERT] will guide me tomorrow.
Now, who can argue with that?
Posted by: Rick Ballard | February 10, 2011 at 05:00 PM
MayBee, Triple OY Vey!!!!
Posted by: clarice | February 10, 2011 at 05:02 PM
Rocco - about "Michelle Wows in $35 Dress" nonsense all over the MFM today - I could just throw up! The dress is a sheer fabric, black background, white dots - each of which are shadowed by periwinkle blue dots, worn with a humongous orange leather boob belt, and accessorized with chartreuse heels.
Yeah, she "wows" alright!
Posted by: centralcal | February 10, 2011 at 05:04 PM
Re the TOA and Extraneous Comments:
OMG!!! -- what next? AF One pulls up and clowns come tumbling out? The Obamaniacs are a bigger joke than the harshest JOMer critics say about. This is a frikkin' nightmare. We are lost.
Posted by: NK | February 10, 2011 at 05:05 PM
It doesn't appear that the monkey god charm or the chants to the rhubarb gods have done much good for this administration.
Posted by: Janet | February 10, 2011 at 05:07 PM
So, Mubarak isn't going anywhere, and the government's position is the same as its been for the last week. The process for reforms in place is right now is the process, and the demonstrators need to go home and let life return to normal.
So was all this just to smoke out potential weak links in the government and military?
Posted by: Ranger | February 10, 2011 at 05:07 PM
So was all this just to smoke out potential weak links in the government and military?
To see who leaked the story that Mubarak was stepping down? Interesting.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 10, 2011 at 05:08 PM
Oh Ranger you have gone to a dark and cynical place.
I prefer to think that the House of Saud wrote a bigger check. But....
Posted by: NK | February 10, 2011 at 05:08 PM
@extraneus/Capt.Hate/JimRhoadesAKA
Thanx. I only blog on The Who & Led Z re music. I was in Saudi next door during the very beginning of the Iranian cock-ups and then in the IO Front Office as Bill Maynes Special Asst. in Foggy Bottom where I learned that Pat Derian, Asst. Sec'y in the Human Rights had VETOED the sale of rubber bullets to the Shah's police. Six months later, the police fired live hot ammo at the students demonstrating killing 400 of them and making the bazaari Middle Class lose confidence in the Shah & switcheroo to the despised Mullahs. Thanks, Pat D, who got her job because she was the spouse of Hodding Carter III, the Princeton Preppie spokesman back in the day. Thanks for singlehandedly probably being the tipping point toward the Mullahs who stone women to death & make them wear the veil. I wonder if Pat D. has a functioning conscience or if she suffers from 'no fault on the left' brain death. She actually by herself vetoed DoD, CIA, & other bureaus at State because she had the ear of the C-in-Chief Peanut Farmer & had used, according to Bill Maynes, her lipstick to scrawl "NO" in giant red caps across the entire Action Memorandum. [Bill told me this seriously and Bill was FOR the rubber bullets, even though a dyed-in-the-wool liberal.]
My successor in Saudi, John Limbert, was sent to Tehran a week before the Embassy was taken over and as the guy with the PhD in Farsi from Harvard, was presumed by Ahmedinejad and the other ignorant savages holding the protesters to be the SUPERSPY CHIEF HONCHO. John & I are still friends, and he despises every single Iranian govt. member today, and calls the Ayatollah "evil." Aside from that, he's an Obama supporter...! Go figure.
Posted by: daveinboca | February 10, 2011 at 05:16 PM
From a Jake Tapper tweet:
Obama Advisor Delivered Presidential Threat To Pakistan Over Detained American
Ooooooh, scary, a "Presidential threat."
:eyeroll:
Posted by: centralcal | February 10, 2011 at 05:16 PM
Muta'assifi I meant Ahmedinejad and the other ignorant savages holding the EMBASSY PERSONNEL in my comment. My friend Mary Beth Koob was one of the women under the personal supervision of the young Ahmedinejad, who was a nasty stickler for not leaving the female hostages let their arms be uncovered even on days over 100 degrees Fahrenheit. She's in the book "Guests of the Ayatollah" and has positively identified the rodent with absolute certainty as the now-President of the Islamic Republic.
Posted by: daveinboca | February 10, 2011 at 05:22 PM
daveinboca,
Have you ever seen http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whuwbyBtwqY>this? It must have been an off night.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | February 10, 2011 at 05:24 PM
"So was all this just to smoke out potential weak links in the government and military?"
It may be but it may also be a check to see which mullahs remain deserving of their army stipend, based upon the level of rage boy rhetoric used in tomorrow's sermons.
I'm not sure why the army would want to tighten its grip at the moment. The food situation is going to worsen rather dramatically over the next six months and a faux hand off today would allow the army some respite in responsibility and the opportunity to step right back in as the economic crisis heightens and then passes.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | February 10, 2011 at 05:26 PM
Extraneus:
Here's my two bits on the Muslim Brotherhood:
Even in the event that some sort of peaceful denouement might be engendered with or without Mubarak or his VP still in the picture, the Everest-sized obstacle to the US 's acceptance of the Ikhwan's legitimacy remains its rejection to this day of the Camp David Accords. As noted above, other long-standing MB positions based on religious rather than political beliefs are significant speed bumps, as in Muslim Brotherhood’s intolerant policies toward the Coptic Christians, women’s rights, its application of shari’a in a constitutional context and which school of shari’a thought might prevail.
And what about international conventions Egypt has signed concerning racial discrimination [1967], discrimination against women [1981], civil and political rights [1982], economic, social and cultural rights [1982], elimination of torture and other cruel and degrading treatment [1986], rights of the child [1990]. Of course, the current Mubarak regime often fails to observe many of these conventions, but the MB would be examined much more closely, perhaps, for infractions than Mubarak.
In the words of an old British saw, accepting the Ikhwan would be like swallowing a camel while rejecting Mubarak might be straining at a gnat.
Posted by: daveinboca | February 10, 2011 at 05:31 PM
Why on earth did Panetta feel he had to venture a guess one way or another? Have these fools ever considered just shutting up?
Their problem with all of them, and most particularly their boss, is that they have yet to entertain an unspoken thought.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | February 10, 2011 at 05:31 PM
Just had the honor of making my first post at AoS. Clapper #129.
Sorry...
Posted by: Danube of Thought | February 10, 2011 at 05:37 PM
Why on earth did Panetta feel he had to venture a guess one way or another?
I know you know this, DoT, but Panetta's boss doesn't really care about any of this except as it affects his political fortunes. Obama has such limited knowledge of the situation and such a limited understanding of the executive that he has no idea when to get out in front of a situation, and when to shut the hell up.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 10, 2011 at 05:46 PM
Ok, here's another possibility... A deliberate effort to spark an over-reaction by the demonstrators to justify a massive crack down and put an end to things.
Posted by: Ranger | February 10, 2011 at 05:49 PM
Ranger--
I am still betting it was a big check from Abdullah to Mubarak.
Posted by: NK | February 10, 2011 at 05:58 PM
I thought about that too Ranger but isn't tomorrow supposed to be "a day of confrontation?"
Posted by: Rocco | February 10, 2011 at 05:59 PM
NK,
It may have been a check plus assurances from both Abdullahs plus Bibi that restoring order would have no negative consequences in the neighborhood.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | February 10, 2011 at 06:02 PM
I thought about that too Ranger but isn't tomorrow supposed to be "a day of confrontation?"
Posted by: Rocco | February 10, 2011 at 05:59 PM
Yes, but perhapse the idea was to spark a confrontation tonight, before the mass crowds could gather tomorrow.
Posted by: Ranger | February 10, 2011 at 06:08 PM
So Mubarak is sticking around and the administration has egg on their face again (going so far as to have DCI go to Capitol Hill and blab about the latest rumnit)?
Are there any adults in the administration that could tell Obama and his clown crew to shut up.
Posted by: RichatUF | February 10, 2011 at 06:09 PM
ust had the honor of making my first post at AoS
Welcome to the party
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 10, 2011 at 06:14 PM
I can't imagine why we are troubling our pretty little heads about this. (a) It's clear the appropriate agencies are being kept well abreast on the happenings there, and (b) anything we need to know we'll find out from AJ or the local Reuters/AP/AFP stringers there.
Posted by: clarice | February 10, 2011 at 06:16 PM
First I think Mubarak got the cashier's check from Abdullah and then a phone call from Bibi, then decided, what the hell, what's under the river card? More here:
http://daveinboca.blogspot.com/2011/02/as-cairo-turns-its-back-on-future.html#links
Posted by: daveinboca | February 10, 2011 at 06:24 PM
RickB-- the Abdullahs and Bibi all PUBLICLY said they had Mubarak's back and I'm sure privately they assured Mubarack nothing but good things would happened if he stuck it out. The check... that was the consideration paid to stick it to the Won. The CINC and his whole crew are pitiful, just pitiful.
Posted by: NK | February 10, 2011 at 06:27 PM
Ranger...that does make sense
Posted by: Rocco | February 10, 2011 at 06:29 PM
DaveinBoca-- I think you're spot on. The Obamaniacs are pitiful, just pitiful.
Posted by: NK | February 10, 2011 at 06:31 PM
Yes, it does appear there is a powerful local tripartite alliance developing in the region to replace the American power vacume. Saudi money, Egyptian manpower, and the Israeli bomb all co-operating to counter Iran.
Posted by: Ranger | February 10, 2011 at 06:57 PM
Are you largely able to walk and chew gum at the same time?
Posted by: Extraneus | February 10, 2011 at 07:03 PM
NK After I left the State Dept, I worked for Amoco which is the single largest corporation in Egypt except the Suez Canal Authority. I was the Political Risk guy there as well as Israel, which I also visited and got a 3-hour one-on-one lunch with Shimon Peres, who was foreign minister at the time and wanted Egypt's fresh water in a pipeline---Amoco built the best pipelines in the world. I was POL officer in the US Embassy in Saudi for three years plus POL/MIL there for a while.
Obama has driven the three of them together and away from Washington, and the damage may be permanent, because even GWB occasionally riled the Arab allies and of course Clinton was distrusted by all of them. Obama is now REVILED in those three countries plus probably Jordan, though I've no first-hand evidence of the Amman POV recently.
If Obama wants to be the hero of the rabble-rousers on the streets, then he's welcome to be Carter-REDUX.
Posted by: daveinboca | February 10, 2011 at 07:04 PM
I didn't realize Amoco was still around. They used to have the most beautiful billboards and ads.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | February 10, 2011 at 07:10 PM
Ok, best headline of the day goes to Kathryn Jean Lopez at The Corner:
Mubarak: I Am an Arab Warrior, Not a Community Organizer
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/259517/mubarak-i-am-arab-warrior-not-community-organizer-kathryn-jean-lopez>A follow-up check-in with Barry Rubin
His final observation:
...Mubarak and the army knew that this would inflame the crowd. The army would not have agreed to this unless it was willing to deal with the consequences.
Posted by: Ranger | February 10, 2011 at 07:14 PM
I long ago accepted that I would sometimes hope that a government official is lying to me.
But I do wish that I did have that hope as often as I have since Obama took office. Almost every day, I find myself thinking that I hope he (or one of his minions) doesn't really believe what they said.
The Clapper remark is what made me think, again, of that little problem.
But then there was Obama's claim to O'Reilly that he hadn't raised any taxes. I am really, really hoping that he was lying to us, because if he believes that we are in even deeper trouble than I thought.
Posted by: Jim Miller | February 10, 2011 at 07:18 PM
Poor Obama must be steaming in the White House. He was all prepared to go on camera and take a victory lap tonight. Now he looks like a fool.
Posted by: Ranger | February 10, 2011 at 07:19 PM
DaveIB--
again I think you are spot on. funny about your ultimate take, I've been teling my right wing pals at the office here today that it's february 1979 all over again. I never thought I'd live to see the day the US would have a more incompetent CINC than Jimmy Carter. It's scary.
Posted by: NK | February 10, 2011 at 07:20 PM
Jim, I accepted Clinton lying about how long the troops would be in Bosnia. Everything else he lied about (ie everything), not so much.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 10, 2011 at 07:20 PM