With Matt Drudge at quarterback conservatives rise up to derail Newton's Force:
Newt Gingrich better hope voters who lapped up his delicious hits on the “elite media” and liberals don’t read the Drudge Report this morning.
Or the National Review. Or the American Spectator. Or Ann Coulter.
If they do, Gingrich comes off looking like a dangerous, anti-Reagan, Clintonian fraud.
It’s as if the conservative media over the past 24 hours decided Gingrich is for real, and they need to come clean about the man they really know before it’s too late.
I found the Tom DeLay bit especially interesting:
• Tom DeLay, a top deputy to Gingrich during the Republican revolution of the mid-1990s, joined the chorus of other conservative members breaking their silence about Gingrich’s erratic leadership style. In a radio interview with KTRH, DeLay said: “He’s not really a conservative. I mean, he’ll tell you what you want to hear. He has an uncanny ability, sort of like Clinton, to feel your pain and know his audience and speak to his audience and fire them up. But when he was speaker, he was erratic, undisciplined.”
To know him is not to love him, as Congressman Peter King wrote last December.
On another front, John King of CNN wrings from the Gingrich camp a concession that Gingrich was, well misinformed when he aggressivey responded to a King question about his alleged 'open marriage'.
Finally, in a bit of 'space coast' pandering, Newt explained that by 2020 he would have solved the problems of earth and we would have a permanent base on the moon. I don't know whether the appropriate response is "Are you kidding me?" or "Are you effing kidding me?".
“He’s not really a conservative. I mean, he’ll tell you what you want to hear. He has an uncanny ability, sort of like Clinton, to feel your pain and know his audience and speak to his audience and fire them up. But when he was speaker, he was erratic, undisciplined.”
Sounds like a typical university professor to me.
Posted by: Ranger | January 26, 2012 at 02:48 PM
American Spectator has a supportive article (for Newt) by Jeffrey Lord.
National Review has a supportive article (for Newt) by Melissa O'Sullivan.
Posted by: centralcal | January 26, 2012 at 02:57 PM
So has Drudge been smashing A-Cup lately?
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 26, 2012 at 03:12 PM
Now the fnork has loosed the big guns. Bob Dole has just come out four square against.the Newt.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vnjagvet | January 26, 2012 at 03:14 PM
Here's a campaign tutorial for all the guys http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAWItrzJBfk&list=UUCtQOUZld0dhuZK7X0W6rXw&index=16&feature=plcp
You're welcome
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 26, 2012 at 03:18 PM
I'll support him if he wins but I'll never forgive him for his attack on capitalism.
Posted by: Rocco | January 26, 2012 at 03:26 PM
Haven't you people ever seen The Big Bang Theory?
Posted by: cathyf | January 26, 2012 at 03:30 PM
So has Drudge been smashing A-Cup lately?
CH, I take a lot of pride in figuring out your argot, but this one has me stumped.
Posted by: lyle | January 26, 2012 at 03:32 PM
lyle, lyle lyle: A-C Ann Coulter
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 26, 2012 at 03:34 PM
Facepalm
Posted by: lyle | January 26, 2012 at 03:36 PM
I may be a girl, CH, but even I noticed that Ann Coulter is (rather spectacularly) NOT an A-cup.
Posted by: cathyf | January 26, 2012 at 03:39 PM
Not to worry; you're among friends
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 26, 2012 at 03:40 PM
When you don't grok the jive you're so last week.
Posted by: sbw | January 26, 2012 at 03:40 PM
Really cathyf? Got any links with visual proof? Because I'm not the first to use that moniker on her (it's tough being original).
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 26, 2012 at 03:42 PM
Her Adam's Apple looks like a solid A-cup.
Posted by: lyle | January 26, 2012 at 03:47 PM
A Time for Choosing
The answer to this Republic Primary imbroglio is simple. There are no easy answers, but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.
Palin - Jindal 2012
Palin - West 2012
Palin 2012 + whomever. . .
ABO-OMG~~ABB-BMG,
Sandy
Posted by: Sandy Daze | January 26, 2012 at 03:51 PM
I hope Madonna does something really stupid during halftime.
Posted by: Sue | January 26, 2012 at 03:55 PM
Sarah's got my vote ... so long as it isn't:
Palin - Romney or
Palin - Gingrich or
Palin - Santorum or
Palin - Paul
Posted by: sbw | January 26, 2012 at 03:55 PM
It's no surprise to me that Newt's a bigger boob than Ann Coulter.
Posted by: Rocco | January 26, 2012 at 03:55 PM
Well we all know the piling on is a typical Democrat strategy that the beltway republicans also resort to if it means anyone threatens there man, Mitt. I am glad to see it for one reason. It puts a name on the enemy. They can hide no longer.
Posted by: Pete | January 26, 2012 at 03:56 PM
This is probably going to get way TMI technical for ya, CH, but the typical American woman wears a bra that is at least one cup size too small and a band size several inches too big. The average woman Ann's shape would wear a 36-A and then be perplexed with the entire failure in brassiere engineering that results. Ann looks like she's wearing a 34-B, or maybe even 34-C. To good effect.
An A-cup is really small -- not very many girls past about 12 or 13 really fit in one. Someone truly an A-cup is pretty much in the bra-optional league.
I assumed that the moniker was deliberately ironic, but maybe it's just guys mouthing off about things that they know nothing about.
Posted by: cathyf | January 26, 2012 at 04:01 PM
I hope Madonna does something really stupid during halftime.
I think it's only a question of degree of stupidity and will it offend Roger Goodell (please please please; I don't ask for much).
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 26, 2012 at 04:01 PM
OMG~ABO--BMG~ABB,
Sandy
Posted by: Sandy Daze | January 26, 2012 at 04:01 PM
I assumed that the moniker was deliberately ironic, but maybe it's just guys mouthing off about things that they know nothing about.
And the initials thingy....
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 26, 2012 at 04:04 PM
another win fr the hard core atheists. It's not surprising with an airline based in Seattle. LUN
Posted by: matt | January 26, 2012 at 04:05 PM
So what was the bucket all about, Newt?
===============
Posted by: There's a hole in it, Dear Liza. | January 26, 2012 at 04:05 PM
I assumed that the moniker was deliberately ironic, but maybe it's just guys mouthing off about things that they know nothing about.
Considering what part of the anatomy the bra supports, the cliche of "guys mouthing off" seems a bit inapt.
Posted by: lyle | January 26, 2012 at 04:08 PM
OT: Awww, that's so sweet.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | January 26, 2012 at 04:14 PM
OMG-ABO~~BMG-ABB,
Sandy
Posted by: Sandy Daze | January 26, 2012 at 04:15 PM
Fred Thompson endorsed Newt and so did Palin.
I just returned from Sarasota where turnout for Newt was very large and enthusiastic.
On the prior threadI pulled together LI's compendium of Reaganites who support Newt, including Nancy and Michael.
Posted by: Clarice | January 26, 2012 at 04:36 PM
And Mittens is a conservative? Since when?
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie | January 26, 2012 at 04:37 PM
Global Warming Update:
Southward extension of Bering Sea Ice is farthest in the past 20 years.
"Ice in Bering Sea threatens crab fishery: Earlier-than-expected ice is moving south over prime crabbing grounds, forcing boats away from their catch and putting millions of dollars of equipment in jeopardy."
"Very cold temperatures and strong winds are pushing the ice south at the rate of 10-15 miles a day, according to the National Weather Service. A rate of 2-3 miles a day is normal. The ice itself has a maximum thickness of two feet."
"The conditions are rare, but not unprecedented, scientists say.
Ice in this area of the Bering Sea is normal, just not this early."
Posted by: daddy | January 26, 2012 at 04:40 PM
Ah Rick, we hardly know you anymore;
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/01/26/santorum-trashes-gingrich-moon-colony/
Posted by: narciso | January 26, 2012 at 04:45 PM
Clearly that is proof of global warming, although that film got it backwards, daddy,
Posted by: narciso | January 26, 2012 at 04:49 PM
ABO~~OMG-ABB~~BMG,
Sandy
Posted by: Sandy Daze | January 26, 2012 at 04:51 PM
cathyf: I would go with 34-C for Coulter.
Posted by: Sara | January 26, 2012 at 04:56 PM
Romney back on top in Florida by 7 or 8 depending on the poll.
Posted by: Sara | January 26, 2012 at 04:56 PM
Welcome home, Clarice. Rush (transcript - didn't listen this morning) has a long detailed piece on the coordinated onslaught going on against Newt (says he is shocked by some of the revelations). Be that as it may, he raises a couple of interesting things:
Reuters is readying a really nasty hit piece against Rubio for release tomorrow.
Dems are hoping our candidate is settled with Florida or at latest March. They will have the money to go the distance trying to destroy our candidate. They have already spent huge sums with big ad buys in Florida (nobody seems to be bothering with attacking Santorum).
Newt and Romney viciously attacking and wounding each other, thereby setting them up for worse to come from the Dems.
Best question Rush asks: So we see how down and dirty our side can get with each other, we see the flurry of Republicans rushing to protect Romney and take down Newt. CAN, WILL these same folks - Romney et al DO THE SAME against Obama?
Therein lies the rub if past history is any guide.
Posted by: centralcal | January 26, 2012 at 04:58 PM
Since we're speaking about tits, I'm glad to see that Barney Frank is getting married to his boyfriend. Let's get his man-boobs out of circulation to the general public.
Posted by: daddy | January 26, 2012 at 05:00 PM
I'm waiting for Newt to endorse Mitt and Mitt to endorse Newt.
Posted by: sbw | January 26, 2012 at 05:01 PM
And Mittens is a conservative? Since when?
Since Newt was. Newt started life as proud supporter of the Ripon Society, always has a bright idea for the government to charge forward with, sat on the couch with Nancy on Global Warming, and endorsed Romneycare.
Newt is such a reliable conservative. And like that other great man of the right, Richard Nixon, he hates the news media.
Posted by: Appalled | January 26, 2012 at 05:03 PM
OMG~ABO--BMG~ABB,
Sandy
Posted by: Sandy Daze | January 26, 2012 at 05:05 PM
And like that other great man of the right, Richard Nixon, he hates the news media.
He has that in common with nearly everyone on the right, so the comparison to Nixon is pretty meaningless.
Question: why do people call Gingrich a man of the right (I heard that on NPR!) but no one calls Obama a man of the left?
Posted by: Porchlight | January 26, 2012 at 05:13 PM
FWIW, I like a 34-B better than a 34-C.
Posted by: daddy | January 26, 2012 at 05:13 PM
Daddy,
Is that based on appearance or handling?
Posted by: Rick Ballard | January 26, 2012 at 05:16 PM
He has that in common with nearly everyone on the right, so the comparison to Nixon is pretty meaningless.
Much of the Gingrich love I sense comes from his pounding on the news media. My point in naming the least conservative GOP President is that chronic complaining about media bias does not make one a reliable conservative.
Point well taken on Obama, by the way.
Posted by: Appalled | January 26, 2012 at 05:18 PM
Question: why do people call Gingrich a man of the right (I heard that on NPR!) but no one calls Obama a man of the left?
Baffling, isn't it? (Sorry for the snark, Porchlight. I couldn't restrain myself.)
Posted by: lyle | January 26, 2012 at 05:18 PM
Question: why do people call Gingrich a man of the right (I heard that on NPR!) but no one calls Obama a man of the left?
I'm still trying to figure out why people call Newt a conservative, when he is not even close.
Posted by: Sara | January 26, 2012 at 05:24 PM
Let this tweet sink in (also, LUN)
"Romney's entire campaign is now centered around charge that Gingrich is as liberal, disloyal and unprincipled as Romney is."
Ouch
Posted by: Jim,MtnViewCA,USA | January 26, 2012 at 05:25 PM
ABO~OMG~~ABB~BMG,
Sandy
Posted by: Sandy Daze | January 26, 2012 at 05:27 PM
Sara,
Do you consider yourself to be a conservative?
Posted by: Sue | January 26, 2012 at 05:28 PM
Just fooling Rick. I never flew the C, just the B, which was a fun plane.
In Primary I flew the T-28-B.
It was just about to be retired but was a great trainer, smelled of dripping oil, and had a distinct sort of Harley engine sound that was killer. Much fun.
Posted by: daddy | January 26, 2012 at 05:29 PM
"the least conservative GOP President"
Hoover fans are outraged. Reagan fans are puzzled as they recall the help Nixon gave Reagan in his '66 run for governor of California. Fnorks are pleased that their success in moving Nixon away from those nasty right wingers is publicly acknowledged.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | January 26, 2012 at 05:29 PM
Does this man, in the LUN, sound like a conservative? (Run the clip -- sounds like a campaign ad Ben Franklin, the poster, might compose)
Posted by: Appalled | January 26, 2012 at 05:29 PM
Read what Dole wrote and don't just be all 'it has to be a lie because I disagree with it'- I disagree with Dole on policy issues, but his letter isn't about policy positions, it is about the personality, character, and effect on elections of Newt. And what he suggests (and what many others have known Newt) is that Newt's 'I hate the media' attacks, wild ideas, one man show, and flipping positions eventually wears out his welcome and he becomes more unfavorable than favorable to voters.
I know you like him, and others like him- but what matters is whether independent and moderate voters will like him or grow tired of his act and instead vote for an Obama who looks sane, stable, and moderate in comparison. I don't freaking care who our nominee is- but it has to be someone who can beat Obama's machine, and Newt has too many negatives that are easily exploitable by the liberal media (which is what moderate and independent voters listen to).
This election has to be about Barack Obama- it can not be about Newt, Mitt, Cain, or Rick. We can not nominate someone who is the 'look at me' type- we need a boring, generic, wallflower character who lived a perfect life with few negatives. We all must realize that our best option is 'generic Republican' for President, capturing the House and the Senate, replacing some Supreme Court justices, and in 4 to 8 years re-assess. Don't bet my children's future on a wild bet on Newt.
Posted by: A Conservative Teacher | January 26, 2012 at 05:30 PM
He delivered the first Republican majority in 40 years, vs. MassCare, the RGGI;
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2012/01/video-of-newt-bashing-reagan-is-bogus.html
Posted by: narciso | January 26, 2012 at 05:30 PM
NRO has a "message" from Bob Dole.
But Oh. Please. The message is obviously a fake.
Everybody knows that Bob Dole always speaks in the 3rd person. As soon as I came upon the usage of "I" it clearly was a obvious fake.
Bob Dole knows that Bob Dole would never talk in the 1st person.
Posted by: Neo | January 26, 2012 at 05:34 PM
Sue: No, I consider myself a conservative leaning libertarian REPUBLICAN. I've never been clear what a conservative is vs a Republican. First presidential vote was in 1968 and I've voted Republican every time. I differ from libertarians in being very pro-military. But, I'm for legalizing marijuana, I despise abortion, I am a strict fiscal Republican, but on most social issues, I just don't care one way or the other, although I support civil unions not gay marriage.
Posted by: Sara | January 26, 2012 at 05:37 PM
Dave,
Barney's fiancee is 42 years younger than he.
I don't think Newt is conservative, I think he is whimsical. Recall the sofa with nancy. And like Rocco I have a hard time forgiving him on his bashing capitalism.
Posted by: Jane | January 26, 2012 at 05:39 PM
Sara,
And you support a candidate who more closely resembles you than Newt does. A moderate republican. A northeastern republican. A Rockefeller republican. Aren't you a native of Pennsylvania? Nothing wrong with being that type of republican but don't tell the rest of us Mitt is more conservative than Newt. Neither are as conservative as Rick Perry was and you hated him. I am supporting Mitt over Newt because I worry Newt will implode. Otherwise, I'd be supporting Newt, because he is more closely aligned with Ronald Reagan republicans than Mitt is.
Posted by: Sue | January 26, 2012 at 05:41 PM
I differ from libertarians in being very pro-military.
Wait...what? Libertarians are not anti-military. At least not the ones I know. They oppose overseas conflicts but support a strong military to defend our borders.
Posted by: Sue | January 26, 2012 at 05:45 PM
lyle,
Snark from you is always welcome. Like this (since it's on topic)
Still makes me chuckle.
Posted by: Porchlight | January 26, 2012 at 05:47 PM
Romney is not a conservative, either. He is whatever you want him to be (where is he? what day is it? who is he talking to?) He will be anything you want him to be.
A.C.T: ...we need a boring, generic, wallflower character who lived a perfect life with few negatives
Oh, so you have met my candidate Garden Gnome? I am still waiting for him to have a name, but the primaries are not over yet.
Posted by: centralcal | January 26, 2012 at 05:47 PM
A ConservativeTeacher:
Thank you for posting. I totally agree with everything you just stated.SE Cupp was on Imus this morning also expressing dislike for Gingrich. She will stay home if he is the nominee but would vote for Santorum or Romney.Sara: I'm glad Mitt's numbers are improving.
SOTU appears to have been a big nothingburger because 8 hours later everyone except MESSbc was talking about something else.
Posted by: maryrose | January 26, 2012 at 05:48 PM
I've never been clear what a conservative is vs a Republican.
No wonder you support Romney.
Posted by: Porchlight | January 26, 2012 at 05:49 PM
Attention Elliott Abrams on Newt: Did Daniels, Barbour, Rollins Know?
American Spectator ^ | 1.26.12 | JEFFREY LORD
Posted on January 26, 2012 5:58:33 PM EST by Qbert
I like Elliott Abrams. Big time.
But…gee. Elliott…Elliott…Elliott.
Mr. Abrams is in the news for this piece over at National Review Online
Sounds saleable, yes? Ex-Reagan State Department aide cites Newt criticism on Reagan.
There's a problem with this story.
[Snip]
Never… not once… did Elliott Abrams ever say to me something along the lines of "that SOB Newt said X." Never. I never heard it from Elliott, and perhaps even more to the point I never heard it from a colleague in our office. One would hear things about, say, then Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter or some such. The President himself would get irked at Specter. But Newt Gingrich? Anti-Reagan? A problem of some sort for the Reagan White House political office? Not a prayer.
If this were a problem, not once did Elliott Abrams ever say a word to me. So the question is: did he say this to someone else? Was there someone inside the Reagan political office who knew all this and never said a word? These folks are around to ask.
One was just on TV addressing the nation the other night. That would be Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels -- the overall boss of the Reagan political office. And then there's now former Governor Haley Barbour of Mississippi, just below Mitch Daniels in the pecking order in the day. Neither ever said a word to the rest of us about Newt being anti-Reagan...
[Snip]
But quite specifically, if Elliott Abrams ever was seriously concerned about Newt Gingrich's relationship with Ronald Reagan he never… ever… brought it to the attention of the White House political office. To the best of my knowledge.
Or… he did. And the answers are there to be had from Governors Daniels and Barbour and from Ed Rollins.
__________
Posted by: Clarice | January 26, 2012 at 05:49 PM
OMG~ABO~~BMG~ABB,
Sandy
Posted by: Sandy Daze | January 26, 2012 at 05:50 PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again: If there's one thing BobDole knows, it's how to beat a left-wing lowlife first-termer who tried to take over the health care system and was soundly repudiated in a mid-term election. On that I think we can all agree.
Posted by: Extraneus | January 26, 2012 at 05:53 PM
Hoover fans are outraged.
Until I started reading "The Forgotten Man" I wouldn't have understood this comment.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 26, 2012 at 05:54 PM
maybe it's just guys mouthing off about things that they know nothing about.
True, she was far too skinny to put herself through law school by stripping.
Many thousands of people make their living by doing sales pitches. Why can't some conservative ones go into politics?
Posted by: Ralph L | January 26, 2012 at 05:55 PM
Wonderful quote, Sandy Daze. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: centralcal | January 26, 2012 at 05:55 PM
I don't think I've said Mitt is more conservative than Newt. At least I don't recall making that comparison. I think his immigration plan is way more conservative than Newt's, and I'm sure there are other issues, but until last go round, I never heard the distinction between conservative as if they are a party of their own vs Republican. I lived under Reagan as governor for 8 years and then president for 8 and worked for his administration for a few months before the '88 election and I thought he was a Republican like me and every other Republican I know, now I find out he was this thing called a conservative.
I thought W's 5-point immigration plan was a sensible plan and I think I first began to resent the term "conservative" when Malkin started her stupid shamnesty campaign. I think Mitt's plan is a good one as I don't see "fixing" this problem until you make it very bad for employers who hire illegals. I agree with Newt that it will be hard to deal with the grandmas who have been here most of their life, but at some point you have to say the law is the law. Most of the time I don't think about illegals until I have to go to an emergency room or I'm told that illegals take such a toll on limited school resources, kids now have to pay $300 per to ride the school bus. And I see red when looking at the So. Cal help wanted ads where nearly every one requires being bilingual Spanish-English.
Maybe I'm just getting old, but I long for the day when the political fight was between Democrats and Republicans, not Democrats vs Republicans vs conservatives.
Posted by: Sara | January 26, 2012 at 05:58 PM
Just to show how rough this campaign is going to get, more agitprop. LUN
Posted by: matt | January 26, 2012 at 06:03 PM
Dear God, matt; I couldn't even make it through the first paragraph of that garbage. Social science: The ultimate oxymoron.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 26, 2012 at 06:12 PM
Wasn't Newt a Rockefella State Chairman in 1968?
Posted by: Rocco | January 26, 2012 at 06:15 PM
Btw, was anyone here able to picture Rand Paul as irate?
Posted by: Extraneus | January 26, 2012 at 06:15 PM
Jeb Bush;
"We cannot be a majority, if we continue to be the Old White Guy Party."
Posted by: Benjamin Franklin | January 26, 2012 at 06:17 PM
Alaska Cold-- Hang in there Daddy, unfortunately for you the Arctic weather pattern will probably remain unchanged for at least 10-20 more days. More cold in western alaska and eastern siberia, lower 48 stay mild. This is going to wind up being the coldest anchorage winter in decades.
Posted by: NK | January 26, 2012 at 06:20 PM
Wasn't Newt a Rockefella State Chairman in 1968?
Rocco, I have no idea. You do realize that was 44 years ago? How old was Newt at that time. Are you the exact same man today that you were 44 years ago?
Posted by: centralcal | January 26, 2012 at 06:25 PM
I assumed that the moniker was deliberately ironic, but maybe it's just guys mouthing off about things that they know nothing about.
We'll depend on you to keep us abreast of the news, Cathy.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | January 26, 2012 at 06:25 PM
CONSERVATIVE:
Adjective:
Holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in politics or religion.
Noun:
A person who is averse to change and holds to traditional values and attitudes, typically in politics.
Based on the "traditional" definition, Mitt is more "conservative." However, I've come to realize that the code word conservative has some very different meaning and Republican has become a dirty word.
Posted by: Sara | January 26, 2012 at 06:28 PM
test
Posted by: daddy | January 26, 2012 at 06:28 PM
That was a very titilating remark, ChaCo, be careful!
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 26, 2012 at 06:29 PM
Sandy Daze:
I'm enjoying your serialization tremendously! It's not just a great read, it gives the thread a nice, unexpected rhythm too.
Posted by: JM Hanes | January 26, 2012 at 06:31 PM
Daddy: Not to make you feel bad or anything, but it is 81 degrees here today.
Posted by: Sara | January 26, 2012 at 06:32 PM
Hmmmm.
I'd be a lot more impressed with this coordinated attack on Newt if ....
1. It wasn't so obviously coordinated.
2. It wasn't being made mostly by complete asshats that I frankly despise even on a good day.
Posted by: memomachine | January 26, 2012 at 06:32 PM
Certainly Newt can articulate the conservative position better than anyone else in this primary or general. Certainly Newt did work with the Reagan revolution whether he sometimes complained about things or not.
I don't care that Newt sometimes fools around with "non-conservative" ideas ... but then I am not a pure conservative in any sense of the term. But ... what's the deal here? Are the conservatives upset about Newt's apostasy? No it seems to be moderates independents and libertarians who are telling conservatives Hey! Newt is NOT a TRUE CONSERVATIVE you numbskulls so GIT WITH MITT already ... sheesh!"
I just find that kind of interesting.
Posted by: boris | January 26, 2012 at 06:34 PM
I take it Barney is a B-cup.
Has Newt been chatting with Jerry Brown? Permanent moon colony?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | January 26, 2012 at 06:37 PM
Boris: Newt is for Newt. Pure and simple. And what is a "true conservative" anyway and how does he/she differ from a true Republican?
Posted by: Sara | January 26, 2012 at 06:41 PM
Boris, I find it interesting, too. All the conservatives are horrified to discover Newt is not a TRUE conservative, so they will all going stampeding to...to...to...Romney?
I am not quite following the logic.
Posted by: centralcal | January 26, 2012 at 06:44 PM
So the Democrats can nominate the most left-wing newbie in the Senate and be crazy in love with the guy, but Republicans can only hope to settle for Romney or Newt or pray for a brokered convention, with a total and complete unpopular failure to run against? Let's face it, we're screwed.
What's the going rate for acreage on St. Jane's Island?
Posted by: Extraneus | January 26, 2012 at 06:45 PM
Porch, He's claimed otherwise in the debates. From Rush...
Newt's also stepped in it, too. He said that he was a Goldwater supporter when he was a Rockefeller state chair. These are the kinds of things, as you heard in the early part of the campaign, people worry about what Newt is going to say at any time, and you don't know here it's gonna come from and you don't know... (interruption) Yeah, he did say it. He said he's a Goldwater supporter. He was a Rockefeller state chair. He was a regional chair for Rockefeller. (interruption) Nelson Rockefeller. Yeah. Yeah. The Rockefeller wing of the party. Correct. Exactly right.
Posted by: Rocco | January 26, 2012 at 06:45 PM
I take it Barney is a B-cup.
I don't think the word cup is gonna cut it for Barney...maybe stein?
Posted by: Janet | January 26, 2012 at 06:45 PM
"I am not quite following the logic." It's in the nature of impeaching one's expertise to determine if one or more of the candidates in, in fact, conservative.
Posted by: MarkO | January 26, 2012 at 06:47 PM
BreakingNews Breaking News
WSJ/NBC News poll: Republican voters nationwide favor Newt Gingrich 37% to 28% over Mitt Romney - @WSJ
Just another meaningless poll, I know. But everybody else does it to underscore their points. Me no underscore - I cannot find any polling today on the candidate, Generic Republican (which is really code for Garden Gnome).
Posted by: centralcal | January 26, 2012 at 06:54 PM
I really, really think the pile on the past two days has been shabby and does not do the reputation of those who engaged in it any good.
It has made me very angry.
Posted by: Clarice | January 26, 2012 at 06:54 PM
ABOOMGABBBMG,
Sandy
Posted by: Sandy Daze | January 26, 2012 at 06:56 PM
I would call it worse than shabby, Clarice.
Posted by: centralcal | January 26, 2012 at 07:02 PM
Newt's on Kudlow right now.
Posted by: Jane | January 26, 2012 at 07:03 PM
Just to fight my own depression...
NJ camel predicts Giants will win the Super Bowl
Posted by: Extraneus | January 26, 2012 at 07:08 PM