David Brooks decides that all tax breaks and government spending are created equal, with deeply dubious results:
We Americans cherish our myths. One myth is that there is more social mobility in the United States than in Europe. That’s false. Another myth is that the government is smaller here than in Europe. That’s largely false, too.
Did he say "social mobility"? Or did he say "Susquehanna Hat Company"? Let's focus on the 'big government' argument:
The U.S. does not have a significantly smaller welfare state than the European nations. We’re just better at hiding it. The Europeans provide welfare provisions through direct government payments. We do it through the back door via tax breaks.
For example, in Europe, governments offer health care directly. In the U.S., we give employers a gigantic tax exemption to do the same thing. European governments offer public childcare. In the U.S., we have child tax credits. In Europe, governments subsidize favored industries. We do the same thing by providing special tax deductions and exemptions for everybody from ethanol producers to Nascar track owners.
These tax expenditures are hidden but huge. Budget experts Donald Marron and Eric Toder added up all the spending-like tax preferences and found that, in 2007, they amounted to $600 billion. If you had included those preferences as government spending, then the federal government would have actually been one-fifth larger than it appeared.
...
You might say that a tax break isn’t the same as a spending program. You would be wrong.
David Bradford, a Princeton economist, has the best illustration of how the system works. Suppose the Pentagon wanted to buy a new fighter plane. But instead of writing a $10 billion check to the manufacturer, the government just issued a $10 billion “weapons supply tax credit.” The plane would still get made. The company would get its money through the tax credit. And politicians would get to brag that they had cut taxes and reduced the size of government!
Well, that certainly proves that some tax breaks can be made to resemble some direct spending.
But consider a spectrum of policies. In case 1, the government gives me a $1,000 tax child care credit; I am free to spend this on an X-box, a vacation, or on any of a number of privately run daycare centers.
In case 2, the government gives me a voucher for $1,000 redeemable at any day care center. Good-bye X-box!
And in case 3, the government keeps the $1,000, builds a day care center, hires staff, and waits for me to drive up to drop off the munchkins.
Would Mr. Brooks really argue that all three are equal manifestations of an intrusive "Big Government", all re-shaping the economy equally? His math says they are equal, but who believes that?
Well. His basic plea for tax simplification will fall on deaf ears - both parties seem to be hooked on it, and IMHO it can only happen in an environment of revenue cutting, not revenue raising. Nostalgia buffs may recall that I rehashed this back when Mr. Brooks was fantasizing about an Obama plea for tax simplification back in December 2010.
Susquehanna hat company?.... slowly I turn.
TomM-- if you're right that tax simplification will never happen because repubs are hooked on it.. then evrything else is BS because we are doomed by Leviathan. Until Leviathan DC is cut down to size by taking away tax code shenanigans, we are doomed.
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 01:55 PM
I agree with him on one point: social mobility is beginning to be a problem. Unfortunately for his conclusion, taxing higher wage earners will exacerbate the problem rather than fix it.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | February 24, 2012 at 01:56 PM
When you think about the choices given Maguire, you will note the absence of choice for the 1% after the Ninety-Nine cornered the Markets.
"Paper, or plastic, sir?"
Gas prices? You can spend a couple of bucks to drive around and shop to save 30-50 cents on a tankfull.
Cell phone? Ditto...
Shall I continue?
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 01:56 PM
Hard to know which thread to post this on, so here goes.
CA forces judges to disclose their sexual preferences
Posted by: Extraneus | February 24, 2012 at 01:59 PM
He's just as wrong about social mobility.
Oh, why even bother explaining..?The chid of a poor immigrant has a much better chance of getting into a good college and getting a professional degree than any kid whose family has been living in France's banlieues for several generations.
Posted by: Clarice | February 24, 2012 at 02:01 PM
Would Mr. Brooks really argue that all three are equal manifestations of an intrusive "Big Government", all re-shaping the economy equally? His math says they are equal, but who believes that?
People in the Crypto-Monarchist Party.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | February 24, 2012 at 02:07 PM
Shades of Rove. It's the same strategy used against Kerry. Attack the opponent's strongest traits.
http://nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/romney-turn-the-tables-strategy-could-turn-on-him-for-the-fall-20120223?page=1
"MILFORD, Mich. — The most consistent note in Mitt Romney’s 2012 campaign is attacking his rivals for their ideological inconsistency. It’s a nervy strategy for a candidate whose own greatest vulnerability is the sense, especially among conservatives, that he has serially reconsidered his positions for political advantage on issues from abortion to gay rights to immigration."
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 02:07 PM
Social mobility? Or Economic mobility? I thought it was the latter that looks to have decreased recently.
I do seem all hung up on terminology lately.
Posted by: AliceH | February 24, 2012 at 02:13 PM
O/T Things have just fallen apart since Eric Stoltz left http://minx.cc/?post=326962
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 24, 2012 at 02:26 PM
The REAL people praying that Congress tries to reform the tax code or go for simplification are the Gucci set on K street. Tax legislation is a cornucopia of ill-gotten gains for the tax lobbyists. It puts their grand children through college and they aren't even born yet.
And after all the twisting and turning and pushing and shoving you will end up with very little but more 1 percenters than currently.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | February 24, 2012 at 02:33 PM
--TomM-- if you're right that tax simplification will never happen because repubs are hooked on it.. then evrything else is BS because we are doomed by Leviathan.--
Only two more years to the 200th anniversary of the burning of Washington.
Anybody got a match?
Posted by: Ignatz | February 24, 2012 at 02:38 PM
In case 2, the government gives me a voucher for $1,000 redeemable at any day care center. Good-bye X-box!
The was a great YouTube of Jude Judy and a guy who got money for rent while he went to college. LUN
Bottom line: while everybody in courtroom could see that the money in question should go toward "rent", our buddy scholar merely saw the money has "his money"
Posted by: Neo | February 24, 2012 at 02:47 PM
Ig-- to anyone watching at the DHS or IRS, Ignatz was strictly joking. No intent to foment violence was included in his comment. Right Ig?
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 02:48 PM
Commerce Clause......inconvenient, isn't it?
http://consortiumnews.com/2012/02/24/madison-father-of-the-commerce-clause/
" the Right seizes on Madison’s efforts during the ratification of the Constitution to play down how radical a transformation he engineered, while ignoring his long record of decrying the Articles of Confederation for their weak central government. The Right also doesn’t mention Madison’s proud promotion of the Commerce Clause and other important federal powers.
It is problematic indeed that Madison, the Right’s new Tea Party icon, was actually the key advocate of the Commerce Clause, which gave the federal government broad powers to regulate interstate commerce and has served as the basis for programs as diverse as Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal, Dwight Eisenhower’s federal highway system and Barack Obama’s health-care reform.
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 02:51 PM
Anybody got a match?
I've got some...er...accelerants handy. Okay, it's really only a fifth of 150 proof rum.
Posted by: lyle | February 24, 2012 at 02:56 PM
Obama administration sees Rio + 20 Summit in June as Festival of Global Greenness
Posted by: Extraneus | February 24, 2012 at 03:03 PM
Hollywood niece (a liberal) says the liberal critics are kicking Act of Valor (she couldn't care less) and the conservative ones are saluting it. Apparently Rush loved it. She says the critics only matter if you're making an art film.
I'm expecting boffo B.O. (I'm picking up the lingo).
Posted by: Danube of Thought | February 24, 2012 at 03:04 PM
Dana-- interestly enough, the POTUS has sworn in briefs to the US Supreme Court that the Obamacare Mandate is a tax -- NOT an exercise of Commerce Clause Power. The Commerce Clause was an absolutely necessary extension of central government power to correct the inadequate central government in the Articles of Confederation. 220 years later, the power mongers in DC have distorted the Commerce Clause and federalism generally beyond all recognition. BTW-- I'm a big Madisonian.
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 03:06 PM
“We consider it an aspirational meeting,” a U.S. State Department spokesman told Fox News.
“This is a good, positive meeting,” in which “we go forward in as pragmatic a way as possible.”
How do they vote for the high priest of this ecumenical conclave? Feather passing?
Posted by: lyle | February 24, 2012 at 03:11 PM
Further BTW Dana-- one of the weaknesses of the Articles was to lack of a sufficient common defense against violence, when a State's militia proved inadequate to put down interruptions of domestic tranquility. The specific event -- why Shay's Rebellion attacking evil bankers who were foreclosing on farms. So one could argue Hamilton/Madison were protecting Fat Cat bankers. A link to wiki on Shay's Rebellion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shays'_Rebellion
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 03:13 PM
A ypung woman apologizes to karzai. If you like this, help make it viral.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYEctbGSkkw
Posted by: Clarice | February 24, 2012 at 03:17 PM
DOT,
Rush raved about Act of Valor, endlessly today. Someone was smart enough to send him an advance copy.
We do not believe in movie theaters where I live so I probably will not see it, but he certainly made me want to.
Posted by: Jane | February 24, 2012 at 03:22 PM
Well, NK. Florida 11th circuit says it's a penalty, not a tax.
http://nahmodlaw.com/2012/01/18/the-patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act-the-commerce-clause-and-constitutional-trust/
(Other aspects of this decision (a) upheld the Act’s Medicaid expansion provisions against a Spending Power challenge, (b) held that the individual mandate was a penalty, not a tax, and thus.Congress could not use the Taxing power to enact it, (c) held that the individual mandate was not a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Necessary and Proper Clause and (d) held that the (unconstitutional) individual mandate could be severed from the rest of the Act.)
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 03:22 PM
Tim Geithner says on CNBC that the rich need to pay more in taxes becuase that is a "Privilege Of Being An American"
Posted by: Neo | February 24, 2012 at 03:22 PM
NK:
Ig-- to anyone watching at the DHS or IRS
Or the NIFC which coordinates efforts of both the USFS and BLM operating under the USDA and DOI respectively.
Posted by: hit and run | February 24, 2012 at 03:23 PM
Jane, somehow I think it will become available online or on pay to view .
Posted by: Clarice | February 24, 2012 at 03:27 PM
Bravo to that young woman. Thanks for sharing it, Clarice!
Posted by: centralcal | February 24, 2012 at 03:29 PM
--Ig-- to anyone watching at the DHS or IRS, Ignatz was strictly joking. No intent to foment violence was included in his comment. Right Ig?--
Wrong.
Good enough for TJ, good enough for me.
Posted by: Ignatz | February 24, 2012 at 03:36 PM
Dana-- yes that 11th Circuit decision is where the Obama Admin LOST and the mandate was invalidated by the Court, the Obama Admin is appealling that to the Sup Ct claiming that the 11th Circuit was wrong and the mandate is a tax. Another Circuit ruled that the mandate is a tax. In any event, the simple truth is that the DC centralized power mongers have abused the Commerce Clause to claim central power over individual citizens in a way never supported by Madison. surely as an OWS supporter, you must object to this massive expansion of power by THE MAN.
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 03:37 PM
"Good enough for TJ, good enough for me."
Calm the fuck down, Ig.
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 03:38 PM
Ig-- TJ did die with massive personal debts that he shoved on his heirs. I believe some of them did some debtor prison time for those debts. TJ did have a way with words though. As I told Dana, bottom line I am much more a Madisonian than Jeffersonian.
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 03:40 PM
ed. lyle
Posted by: lyle | February 24, 2012 at 03:44 PM
But he sure can spot a well-creased pantleg, so he's got that going for him.
Posted by: lyle | February 24, 2012 at 03:46 PM
" surely as an OWS supporter, you must object to this massive expansion of power by THE MAN."
Yes, I know it lost. That's why I thought the Court's belief that it is a penalty would have some creds with you. I see nothing wherein Obama has sought to make it a tax rather than a penalty.
As to THE MAN; it depends on the man.
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 03:46 PM
TJ loaded Monticello up with French wines for which he could not pay. A frailty, to be sure. He was also the principal author of the Declaration of Independence. Take him all in all.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | February 24, 2012 at 03:48 PM
Dana-- thanks for the honesty, seriously--
you said: "As to THE MAN; it depends on the man."
Dana, you are a nihilist power monger. If there is a tyranical government that takes care of Dana, and gives Dana what Dana WANTs, that's fine with Dana. Nice. Freedom, liberty mean nothing to Dana, just give Dana the material pleasures he wants, and everyone, including Dana, can be oppressed. I actually thought better than you, than you do of yourself. Sad.
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 03:53 PM
OT
Can't get Typepad to download my write-up of my recent Tour of Bangalore, so I beg your indulgence if anyone cares, as I try to break it up into postable bits. Apologies in advance if I disturb the thread.
JiB,
OT, but late in replying about visiting the Nandi Bull Temple in Bangalore. It proved a fun visit.
Bangalore, at 3,000 feet elevation, is so much cooler than sweltering Bombay and Delhi, and at only 11 Million population, not the 12 and 13 million of the other 2, who could complain? Traffic and pollution were awful, but again in comparison to her big sisters, she was as clean as a whistle, and that's how I viewed things. My co-worker however, never having been to India before, was appalled. (I love observing reactions like that:)
The big Bull was cool. Shiva rides on him etc, and according to the Temple caretakers this one was carved in the 1500's-1600's to stop a real bull from eating all the local peanuts. Unfortunately, since peanuts are a New World Product and didn't arrive into India until the 18th Century, one is left anachronistically scratching one's head, but that happens over here a lot. A good visit; got the red dot inscribed on my forehead for my 20 Rupee donation, but earned 100 times the pleasure of the donation from watching my squeamish co-worker worried at the germs being sucked up by his bare feet from traipsing the the local dirt and from inhaling the coconut oil drenching the sacred black bull monolith---Priceless:) A good man...
Posted by: daddy | February 24, 2012 at 03:54 PM
TJ did die with massive personal debts that he shoved on his heirs
I've heard that, but have never been clear on it. Was the law different back then? Debt (personal, at least) can't be pushed onto heirs nowadays, at least not as far as I'm aware.
Posted by: jimmyk | February 24, 2012 at 03:54 PM
Clarice,
Thanks for that vid. I just sent it out to our Veteran's committe hoping from them it goes big time viral. "Lack of balls" indeed.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | February 24, 2012 at 03:55 PM
...Enjoyed also touring Bangalore Palace, neat old Sultan's home from the 1880's. Interesting to tour each room with a headset explaining the furnishings. Was somewhat expecting reminders of "Indiana Jones and The Temple Of Doom" but found instead that the last Sultan was into dozens of terrible paintings (almost Elvis on velour style) of scantily clad naked western gals with their big hooters hanging out. Co-worker remarked that "he admired the sentiment, but man, this cats got awful taste." Truer words, n'er spoke.
It really struck me how now with the internet I/we can see the entire world and any actual painted masterpiece in it at an instant, but the 14th Sultan of whomever couldn't so therefore in 1880 he had prominently hung a terrible knockoff copy painting of "The Rape Of The Sabine Women", probably by some Pickadilly street hustler, and that was the centerpiece of his Gallery. I too "admired the sentiment", but...
Posted by: daddy | February 24, 2012 at 03:56 PM
"I actually thought better than you, than you do of yourself. Sad."
You gleaned all that from a simple statement?
You're a better man than I, Gunga Din.....
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 03:56 PM
TJ loaded Monticello up with French wines for which he could not pay.
I toured Monticello a few years back. It was wild seeing very old (empty) bottles of Burgundy and Bordeaux near the kitchen. Suffice to say, the French don't exactly update their labels.
Posted by: lyle | February 24, 2012 at 03:58 PM
JimmyK-- I'm no expert on 18th century Virginia creditor/debtor law, but apparently the coastal cavaliers who ran 18th century Virginia were less enlightened than the Federal bankruptcy Code. As Dana would say, those cavalier bankers were THE MAN, and debtor yeoeman farmers and their children were screwed if they couldn't repay the bank.
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 03:58 PM
I believe some of them did some debtor prison time for those debts.
I'd sure like to see that documented. I'm pretty sure the US has never had explicit debtors' prison.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | February 24, 2012 at 04:00 PM
Dana-- Churchill said "a little joke is a serious thing." Thanks for the compliment, though, I like Kipling.
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 04:00 PM
Clarice, I've forwarded that apology around. Thanks.
Posted by: bgates | February 24, 2012 at 04:01 PM
Only a lib would argue the commerce clause regulates non-commerce. (And that "necessary and proper" covers whatever they think would be nice.)
Either SCOTUS will strike down Obamacare, or "enumerated powers" will cease to have meaning. Not sure how much difference it'll make, either way. At least libs are consistent: they support that abortion of a bill.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | February 24, 2012 at 04:04 PM
Here's what the Monticello Society says:
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | February 24, 2012 at 04:05 PM
thank you, bgates. I got it from verner BTW.
Here's an interactive religious topography of the US.http://www.usatoday.com/news/graphics/pew-religion-08/flash.htm
Posted by: Clarice | February 24, 2012 at 04:06 PM
Charlie thanks for the history. So TJ died deep in debt... any word if his heirs got stuck with that debt? debtor prison?
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 04:07 PM
Of fun interest was Ishcon Temple. Only after arrival did we discover that Ishcon meant The "International Society for Krishna Consciousness". This was ground zero in Bangalore for the Hari Krishna's. At each of 108 steps climbing up the Temple you are supposed to queue in a line of other devotees and continually repeat the 16 words that will free you from the evilness of our current age and bring one internal peace and happiness:
"Hare Hrishna, Hare Hrishna, Krishna Krishna, Hare Hare,
Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Rama".
Repeat 108 times a day and one is in bliss.
I don't want to look too long at that sequence of words I typed because I don't want it to become a sort of brain slug like "Aww Honey... Sugar Sugar...You are my candy girl..." from the Archies, that is never never ever going to leave my noggin in peace again. It was mantra'd over the loud speakers non-stop, so be forewarned.
Posted by: daddy | February 24, 2012 at 04:08 PM
Daddy-- you're the best. Love the travelogs.
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 04:11 PM
I don't want to look too long at that chanted sequence of words I typed above because I don't want it to become a sort of brain slug like "Aww Honey... Sugar Sugar...You are my candy girl..." from the Archie's, that is never, never, ever going to leave my noggin' in peace again. The Hare Krishna brain worm was mantra'd over the loud speakers non-stop, so be forewarned.
Anyhow, being non devotee's we 2 and our guide were able to sidestep the humongous line of hundreds doing the 'step-recite-step-recite' ritual. We breezed thru various images of Krishna's consorts, then wound up at the top of the Temple in a gorgeous cool domed hall, with fab ceilings paintings of blue skinned Krishna as a child mischievously stealing milk and butter.
The provided literature said that Krishna is a God because he has the 6 attributes of "All-attractiveness":
"one is attractive due to(1) wealth, (2) power, (3) fame, (4) beauty, (5) wisdom and (6) renunciation...Humanity in its history has not come across another personality with such activities unparalleled in the history of the world. By all historical accounts, Lord Krishna appeared 5,000 years back and played his part as a human being to perfection."
So I'm not a God. Bummer:( But I did get a lot of enjoyment watching my co-worker squirm about the possible diseases invading the soles of his feet). All one can say at such humorous moments, is WTF, or even better, "Hare Hrishna, Hare Hrishna, Krishna Krishna, Hare Hare, Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Rama".
The Temple included a few wax figurines and statues of their dead saint Sri somebody. He looked to me like the Guru who converted Carlos Santana in the mid 80's to being Carlos "Devadip" Santana, when he rocked out in bliss with Mahavishnu John McLaughlin. Then met a nice Canadian gentleman with the big line of mud from the crown of his head to his nose and the red dot who I think used to be a College prof in California..."Hare Hrishna, Hare Hrishna, Krishna Krishna, Hare Hare, Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Rama".
The Vedic literature about Krishna is "Bhagavid Gita--Wie Sie Ist" (Did that Desutch bit in honor of you Frau:) In English it's "As it is") It tells us to be happy, which now makes sense to me in reconsidering the case episode of the Hare Krishna from Oliver sack's terrific book of neurological case studies, "An Anthropologist on Mars".
The case of "The Last Hippie" describes a man suffering from the effects of a massive brain tumor, including anterograde amnesia, which prevents him from remembering anything that has happened since the late 1960s."
That is Steven, an old Grateful Dead fan, who has had a massive brain tumor after becoming a Hare Krishna but is not given medical treatment for his increasing blubbering and smiling senility caused by a horrendous brain tumor, because it is not viewed as an affliction but instead is viewed as saintly Krisha type behavior from a guy who goes blind and who turns more and more to the imbecilic happiness and renunciation of the world as is yearned for when one says 108 times every day, "Hare Hrishna, Hare Hrishna, Krishna Krishna, Hare Hare, Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Rama".
Krishna, BTW, is now a Pixar type TV character, to help spread the word of the god. Meet Little Krishna
"Hare Hrishna, Hare Hrishna, Krishna Krishna, Hare Hare, You are my candy girl... and You've got me wanting you."
Posted by: daddy | February 24, 2012 at 04:12 PM
I suppose even today if the debt is tied to an asset (like real estate or a farm), and the heirs don't want to liquidate it, then they have to assume the debt. But they wouldn't be personally liable for it.
According to Wiki: "In 1833 the United States abolished Federal imprisonment for unpaid debts,[5] and most states outlawed the practice around the same time."
Posted by: jimmyk | February 24, 2012 at 04:17 PM
TJ's S-I-L got into financial trouble on his own and went bust in the crash of 1819 if I recall my UVa days correctly. Debts were often assumed by children to preserve the family honor, but I never heard about an heir going to prison for them.
DoT is correct...take the man in full.
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 24, 2012 at 04:18 PM
Does anyone care that Jefferson was deep in debt when he died? I certainly don't.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 24, 2012 at 04:19 PM
Great, daddy. You aren't missing much around here. Michelle took another expensive vacay and then hit up big donors with a message to keep sacrificin' and Barack says we can get all the energy we need from pond scum.
Posted by: Clarice | February 24, 2012 at 04:22 PM
"Does anyone care that Jefferson was deep in debt when he died? I certainly don't."
---low information voter------
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 04:24 PM
Porch-- I agree with DoT and OL that in evaluating historical figures, one should "take the man in full." And TJ's profligate personal lifestyle (plus libertine in Paris) compares very poorly with say Washington, who died with his worldly affairs, not only in order, but he emancipated and gave material aid to former slaves. So yes, how this Founder TJ conducted his personal affairs is important, to a degree.
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 04:24 PM
Political "studies" expert Chief Sham Wow of the Feather Heads is emulating our president and feigning to be his brother's keeper.
Posted by: Frau Schnappsladen | February 24, 2012 at 04:25 PM
daddy,
Any idea why we don't see the Hare Krishna guys anymore at the airports? TSA?
Use to be part of the commercial flying culture to sit a bar waiting for your flight to be called and have the Krishna's entertain you:)
Posted by: Jack is Back! | February 24, 2012 at 04:25 PM
'Bam = ALGAE!!!!!
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 04:25 PM
Shut up, Dana. Jefferson is not on any ballot. The point is that highly-informed voters understand the value of his contribution regardless of his estate's fiscal condition at the time of his death.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 24, 2012 at 04:25 PM
I don't want it to become a sort of brain slug like "Aww Honey... Sugar Sugar...You are my candy girl..." from the Archies
I think it would become a brain slug like "He's So Fine" by Ronnie Mack.
the last Sultan was into dozens of terrible paintings (almost Elvis on velour style) of scantily clad naked western gals with their big hooters hanging out
Are you sure he was the last? I've noticed something similar on a blog just recently.
Posted by: bgates | February 24, 2012 at 04:27 PM
NK, I'm not disputing the contrast between TJ and Washington (whom I hold to be the greater man, for various reasons), just saying I can't get too worked up about any debt TJ might have left. Agree about "the man in full," generally.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 24, 2012 at 04:30 PM
In 1830, Charles Goodyear was sent to jail in Philadelphia for debts and continued to work on his formula for rubber while there. In fact, he was jailed ten times for debts.
Chaco, Du bleibst großartig.
Posted by: Frau Schnappsladen | February 24, 2012 at 04:31 PM
fair enough Porch.
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 04:32 PM
daddy, you left out the "Honey, honey" part. We used to have over 40 bee hives (a bee yard)in the foothills here, and I've always been partial to that part of the song.
Posted by: Frau Schnappsladen | February 24, 2012 at 04:34 PM
"Shut up, Dana"
I was trying to be humorous...
Have I failed?
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 04:35 PM
daddy,
If you are ever again in Bangalore, you might want to take 40km trip to Nallur for the ruins of the Chennakeshava Temple. They are set in the grove of ancient Tamarind trees. My driver told me the trees were 1,000 years old and looked it. But the ruins are spectacular and there are no vendors or cafes or guys hawking t-shirts - just thousand year old Hindu altars, temples and such. Pretty neat.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | February 24, 2012 at 04:37 PM
I love history. Took out a major in it, back when there wasn't nearly so much. But, I'm curious about things and about how and why people did what they did. Will Jefferson's debts or his bastard children make a difference in my regard for the Declaration of Independence? Of course not. The past is a foreign country. We have no standing to criticize the actions of those in different times. We can disagree, claim we would never do the same thing, but we are lying to ourselves. We don't know.
For a part of my life it was widely accepted that black and white children should not go to school together. Widely. JFK was slow to warm to MLK, Jr. Maybe the study of history can give one pause.
Posted by: MarkO | February 24, 2012 at 04:38 PM
"Any idea why we don't see the Hare Krishna guys anymore at the airports?"
Here's a possibility.
Posted by: daddy | February 24, 2012 at 04:40 PM
"Maybe the study of history can give one pause."
All accurate info is all good. What I don't understand is the incurious amongst us.
Must be a Bush holdover.
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 04:41 PM
who died with his worldly affairs, not only in order, but he emancipated and gave material aid to former slaves
I think he had a caveat. They were to be emancipated upon the death of Martha, who saw the necessity to emancipate them before they killed her off. ::grin::
Posted by: Sue | February 24, 2012 at 04:42 PM
Not sure what the debt TJ owed on his wine collection has to do with burning Leviathan down, but have at it.
And NK, I too am Madisonian so long as the structures he established are still functioning. A pretty good case can be made most aren't.
Posted by: Ignatz | February 24, 2012 at 04:42 PM
"I was trying to be humorous...
Have I failed?"
Don't ask me.
Posted by: Threadkiller | February 24, 2012 at 04:43 PM
"The past is a foreign country."
This is the first half of the first line of a great novel. Ten points for the person who guesses first. No googling!
Posted by: Porchlight | February 24, 2012 at 04:43 PM
MarkO-- my point is that TJ wrote some of the most important word in history, that include "all men are created equally" and that liberty is endowed on all men by their same creator, but GW actually lived those words much better than TJ.
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 04:43 PM
"Don't ask me."
That is depressing, TK.
Everyone relies on your humormeter....
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 04:46 PM
--the last Sultan was into dozens of terrible paintings (almost Elvis on velour style) of scantily clad naked western gals with their big hooters hanging out--
--Are you sure he was the last? I've noticed something similar on a blog just recently.--
Well it's not exactly spring, but when a young man's fancies turn from the latest internecine bloodletting of Newt, Rick, Willard and Otis Sistrunk's fraternity brother at the University of Mars I can't think of a more rewarding place for them to turn.
Posted by: Ignatz | February 24, 2012 at 04:47 PM
Porch-- I don't know that quote. I feel great shame. Ask Dana he's degreed by Yale.
dana-- I'm surprised you judge intellectual curiosity so important. I thought as long as THE MAN took care of you it was all good.
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 04:47 PM
Have I failed?
Only at everything you have ever attempted including relationships. Too bad the creator is not inclined to just give out As for breathing and bothering to attend class like you or you would be a winner...
Posted by: Gmax | February 24, 2012 at 04:47 PM
NK, no worries. The novel is actually probably more obscure than the quote. But I was happy to be reminded of it.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 24, 2012 at 04:49 PM
" I thought as long as THE MAN took care of you it was all good."
Not the exclusion of independent verification. I am curious, but not yellow.
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 04:49 PM
Can we anticipate a visit by the cock-puppet master?
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 04:51 PM
"pond scum"
skim baby skim
Posted by: Chubby | February 24, 2012 at 04:51 PM
Chubby-- excellent snark!!
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 04:53 PM
"Ask Dana he's degreed by Yale."
What no independent verification; just regurgitating Danyoob's fallacious research?
Madison weeps.....
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 04:53 PM
I just started watching "Dinner with Andre" and five minutes in I'm bored to tears. Is there any gold in there? Is it worth persisting?
Posted by: Chubby | February 24, 2012 at 04:55 PM
sorry;
'Danyoob's phallacious research....'
fifm
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 04:55 PM
Porch,
Read The Go-Between as teenager. My grand-dad was an Englishman and had this collection of books from the late 1880's to the 1950's. Mostly British writers, especially Victorian but threw in a few Huxleys, Priestly's and Waughs (all of the Waughs:). I believe it was the last book he read before he passed away.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | February 24, 2012 at 04:56 PM
"Exclusion independent Verification" that's a curious claim. You can disagree with the JOM 'convention wisdom', but around here the wisdom is based and and challenged by facts.
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 04:58 PM
apologies dana if you're not degreed by Yale. My recollection was that your website said you were.
Posted by: NK | February 24, 2012 at 05:00 PM
((Ten points for the person who guesses first. No googling!))
the worst of it is, I think I've read it ...
charlotte bronte?
Posted by: Chubby | February 24, 2012 at 05:01 PM
I think got it ... Daphne duMaurier
Posted by: Chubby | February 24, 2012 at 05:02 PM
Prize goes to Jack is Back! Good work.
I love that book. Your grand-dad had good taste. You can see its influence in Atonement by Ian McEwan.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 24, 2012 at 05:04 PM
"the wisdom is based and and challenged by facts."
If you must say so, and you MUST. But the origin of this matter was precipitated by the comment that TJ's debt is not fit for discussion.
I believe those facts comprise the extent of curiosity; and that, my friend, is lacking.
But, you must curry the favor of the incurious, as well as the curious.
Understood........
Posted by: Ben Franklin | February 24, 2012 at 05:04 PM
Not quite, Chubby. But it's funny - I was just talking about Daphne duMaurier with my co-worker not 30 minutes ago.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 24, 2012 at 05:04 PM
Does anyone care that Jefferson was deep in debt when he died? I certainly don't.
Not "care" in the sense of judgment, but I'm fascinated by the lives of historical figures, especially the founding fathers. I've devoured biographies of Franklin, Washington, Hamilton, and others. All had flaws, as anyone does, and that's part of who they were. The personal flaws don't detract from the great political accomplishments, if anything one is reminded that these amazing people were also regular flesh and blood humans.
Posted by: jimmyk | February 24, 2012 at 05:04 PM
I just started watching "Dinner with Andre" and five minutes in I'm bored to tears.
It wasn't my cup of tea, but I know people I respect who absolutely loved it (and others that had exactly your reaction).
Posted by: jimmyk | February 24, 2012 at 05:06 PM