« The President Of Fog And Sand | Main | Happy Empty Chair Day »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b2aa69e2017c319b5894970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sunday Morning:
The comments to this entry are closed.
Minus 16 at Raz today.
Trails Romney by 4.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 02, 2012 at 09:40 AM
Sundays sure would be crummy without Clarice.
Posted by: Old Lurker | September 02, 2012 at 09:43 AM
Agree, O.L.!
Posted by: centralcal | September 02, 2012 at 09:54 AM
Nice Pieces, C. I wonder what the internal discussion at Comcast is about MSNBC. They're not in the business of throwing money away without expecting a decent return on it. Microsoft has already pulled the plug on it. Hard to imagine that a lot of their conservative cable customers haven't complained about being charged in their basic package for that garbage propaganda.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 02, 2012 at 09:54 AM
Do we have a redefinition for the phrase " Clintonian"?
Posted by: mikey | September 02, 2012 at 09:55 AM
Clarice, it couldn't have been better.
One would think that having been exposed, the media would tend to self-correct. Brazenly, they admit they just don't care if we know how corrupt they are.
Keep at it. We need you.
Posted by: MarkO | September 02, 2012 at 09:58 AM
Well they were 'nudge nudged' by Mark Lloyd,
'the very model of a major apparatchik' into
establishing a number of 'very selective' network properties, Captain,
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 10:03 AM
Boy, guys--thanks!! In today's WaP Kathleen Parker suggests the R's need to attract more minorities. Guess she watched the convention on MSNBC..No?
Posted by: Clarice | September 02, 2012 at 10:04 AM
Great Pieces, Clarice.
I still think the so called MSM is simply a bunch of leftist propaganda spreaders.
Saw a note on the last thread that the Obamas plan to sell their Chicago house.
Wonder if Rezko will serve as their real estate advisor again?
Posted by: pagar | September 02, 2012 at 10:09 AM
Reposting this link: Janet Daley. Excellent summary gist of the big picture (aside from the fact that the poor dear has accepted MSM portrayal of the Tea Party.)
Posted by: Jim Ryan | September 02, 2012 at 10:10 AM
Chris as I said doe NOT live in DC though he pretended to. He has two houses one in nearby Md and another in Nantucket. Here is his Md House.http://www.celebrityhousepictures.com/chris-matthews.php
Think he can see the black proletariat from his front porch?
Posted by: Clarice | September 02, 2012 at 10:11 AM
Why would she let that get in the way of her daily 'red pill' Clarice, her 'cry for help' in the Daily Basilisk, that is in pink, like the Columbia mean girl, is classically insane.
The film 'They Live' about an Alien invasion, masked by a program of subliminal programming,
intended as an allegory of the Reagan years, is the very model they are pursuing.
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 10:13 AM
I thought it was decent piece, Jim, of course
the Borg has thoroughly taken over in Perfidious Albion, so Daley is offering a warning.
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 10:25 AM
Here's hoping that Reince Priebus is perpetually out of the office whenever Client 9's dumpy former broadcast partner calls with strategic advice.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 02, 2012 at 10:26 AM
They have brought spokeszombie Cutter, 'what need of brain' back but only for Schieffer, who is distracted by small shiny objects.
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 10:29 AM
The moron horde weighs in:
Clarice Feldman @ American Thinker has a piece on media insanity building to a fever during the RNC Convention and its relationship to the Preference Cascade, complete with a good definition from Glenn Reynolds.
Definitely worth your time at some point.
Good imbedded link to Sultan Knish and a discussion of how the MFM set the table for all of this.
Posted by: ontherocks at September 02, 2012 10:23 AM (aZ6ew)
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 02, 2012 at 10:29 AM
I see that Clinton advisor and purveyor of the first question about contraception in this election, Tiny George, claims there is no media bias.
They all need to be impeached in every interview. First answer should be to set the nature of their interrogation and alert the viewers as to who they are.
Posted by: MarkO | September 02, 2012 at 10:30 AM
The purpose of the sand sculpture is for it to be vandalized. Because racism.
Posted by: RokShox | September 02, 2012 at 10:32 AM
Well remember he was one year behind Obama, at Columbia, and wrote his thesis, on the same topic, surrender, I mean arms control.
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 10:34 AM
Bill Richardson (who I always confuse with Sandy berger is back)
According to Stehanie Cutter the entire convention was personal attacks and all you know about the republicans is "Lying is a virtue".
Stephanie goes on to tell endless lies.
Posted by: Jane - It's gonna be a Tsunami in November | September 02, 2012 at 10:35 AM
Given how vain Obama is, that jowly sand image is bizarre. That the express purpose was for it to be "attacked" is the only thing that makes sense imo.
Posted by: DebinNC | September 02, 2012 at 10:39 AM
Well they both have similar body types, as P.J. Orourke, described in another context'
compact like an attack squirrel' one pled out, another wasn't even indicted, so they have that going for them.
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 10:39 AM
--The purpose of the sand sculpture is for it to be vandalized.--
Assuming our sandy CinC survived any overnight squalls somebody ought to drape one of those Code Pink vulva suits over it with his head sticking out. (would it be too much to also place a vuvuzela in his mouth?)
In any event it would certainly highlight just what a colossal d*** he is.
As a matter of fact it would highlight just exactly what he's been doing to the country for the last four years.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 02, 2012 at 10:40 AM
Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?
Gov O'Malley: That's not the question.
Wanna bet?
Posted by: Jane - It's gonna be a Tsunami in November | September 02, 2012 at 10:40 AM
I heard another spokesdrone on a local station, 'that's a backward looking question'
I missed the revising of the Newspeak dictionary, in the original round.
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 10:42 AM
Re that Robinson fellow at Foggy Bottom, that
seems to agree with the language at the Custer
memorial.
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 10:44 AM
Obama campaign spokesman Stephanie Cutter: Obama has created "more jobs than...in the Reagan recovery."
Insanity.
Posted by: Jim Ryan | September 02, 2012 at 10:46 AM
Wish someone would ask O'Malley if his taxing and spending has left Maryland better off than VA under fiscal conservative Gov. McConnell.
Posted by: DebinNC | September 02, 2012 at 10:48 AM
The empty chair needs a "Four MORE years???" sign in front of it.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | September 02, 2012 at 10:51 AM
With Matthew Dowd on, I tend to doubt it.
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 10:51 AM
posted by glasater on FB -
Too funny!
Posted by: Janet | September 02, 2012 at 10:56 AM
You couldn't make this up, even in an episode of criminal minds;
http://theothermccain.com/2012/09/02/kimberlin-rauhauser-axis-targets-romney-campaign-staffer-bill-murphy/
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 10:59 AM
That's not the question.
Indeed, Jane, it is not. The question is, Are you going to continue to believe what you know are lies or are you going to admit to yourself the following:
One by one, people admitting these things to themselves: preference cascade.
Posted by: Jim Ryan | September 02, 2012 at 11:02 AM
Is this too smelly for the fish, that they didn't give the samples or the internals is a clue;
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/polls/247087-poll-obama-retakes-lead-after-post-tampa-bounce-for-romney
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 11:04 AM
Spectacular, Clarice.
I particularly loved lard-ass Ifill's "one mistake" characterization of Chalian's comment. The only mistake he made was not knowing the mic was on What he said was not a mistake at all; it was precisely what he wanted to say.
I'm not sure I like the term "preference cascade," but I'll go with it. I sure do sense that we're seeing one with respect to the incumbent fraud.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 02, 2012 at 11:09 AM
The proof of which, was there was no dissaproval at the time, of Chelian's remarks,
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 11:12 AM
It was only subsequently when they were called on it, that they fired him.
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 11:14 AM
Raz:
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 02, 2012 at 11:25 AM
--OK, then, new question - why is the DNC running an Alfred E Neumann "What, me worry?" tribute?--
Just a small quibble, but since he is my life coach and inspiration I have to point out it is actually Alfred E. Neuman with only one "n".
I must confess I'm not too concerned about it.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 02, 2012 at 11:26 AM
How many watched Tom Friedman this morning spews his opinions on all issues but when pressed by Newt Gringrich on tax payer late term abortion the Democrat platform he states " It is defensible but I am hear as a journalist" What a wimp
Posted by: mikey | September 02, 2012 at 11:29 AM
Why I don't like Rove (in his own words):
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/turnabout-now-calls-for-rove-to-go/
Rove's preferred chair is electric.
Posted by: Threadkiller | September 02, 2012 at 11:30 AM
yeah, TK...I'm sick of Rove. The people of the United States vote for their candidates...Rove doesn't get to pick. I don't want Republican masters either.
Perhaps Rove could point out the extreme Dem. position of okaying scissors stuck in a partially born infant's skull?
Posted by: Janet | September 02, 2012 at 11:42 AM
Oh for God's sake. I take a back seat to nobody in disdain for Rove but could we please just do away with the circular firing squad?
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 02, 2012 at 11:43 AM
Empty Chair:
Posted by: hit and run | September 02, 2012 at 11:52 AM
Btw Janet, my 11:43 is in response to TK's link; I don't disagree with anything you subsequently posted.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 02, 2012 at 11:52 AM
I agree Captain Hate. Rove and Crossroads is essential for any Republican victory in November. If Akin misspoke and should be forgiven, Rove should be forgiven also.
Posted by: bio mom | September 02, 2012 at 11:54 AM
Yeah, let's keep all our guns pointed outside the tent for the next two months. I smell blood.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 02, 2012 at 11:54 AM
--Oh for God's sake. I take a back seat to nobody in disdain for Rove but could we please just do away with the circular firing squad?
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 02, 2012 at 11:43 AM--
Yeah, as long as we recognize Rove and the others still shooting at Akin, are part of the circle.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 02, 2012 at 11:56 AM
If anyone missed this Ned Rice fact-check of Clint Eastwood and wants a chuckle: here it is
Posted by: DebinNC | September 02, 2012 at 11:59 AM
I agree, CH. This, unfortunately, was obviously going to happen. Rove didn't just dis-associate with Stankin, he decided to make a big scene out it.
Push back doesn't happen if nobody pushes to begin with.
I am swearing off Rove and Akin for the thread, if that helps.
Posted by: Threadkiller | September 02, 2012 at 12:00 PM
From the New York Times, no less:
"Ear-splitting roars." You think the incumbent asshole is starting to sense it?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 02, 2012 at 12:02 PM
Yeah, let's keep all our guns pointed outside the tent for the next two months.
What he said.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | September 02, 2012 at 12:04 PM
Yeah, as long as we recognize Rove and the others still shooting at Akin, are part of the circle.
I agree - Rove does good work for the party, yada yada, but he should learn how to shut up sometimes.
Sunday thoughts. One thing that alarms me is that the betting (intrade) on Mitt's chance to win was hovering around 44.5% right until the moment he started speaking at the convention. Then it started nosediving on good volume and hasn't recovered; it's about 42.5% now (and those two points are not insignificant). For intrade bettors, the RNC convention was a net negative, or they perceive that the Dem convention will neutralize it. I've read that, barring a "black swan event", Obama's betting odds will just gradually improve until election day. That doesn't seem impossible to me, though I wonder what the black swan event was for Reagan; "There he goes again"?
On a brighter note, I was also wondering what Obama's concession speech would sound like. I can't just can't imagine him being a big enough man to be gracious; I'd guess he'd go kicking and screaming, lamenting how the populace was stupid, or the election rigged.
Posted by: hrtshpdbox | September 02, 2012 at 12:07 PM
Bain Capital illustrated.
The Bust-Out-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reiq4lEvnEw
Posted by: tootsie roll | September 02, 2012 at 12:18 PM
No it will not be gracious. I'll be interested to see if he can keep the seething resentment at bay; he was barely able to do that in the speech he gave after the 2010 elections and that was probably because the Pinhead Troika had convinced him the results weren't about him.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 02, 2012 at 12:20 PM
Axelrod declines to tell us whether we're better off now than we were four years ago.
Think Gwen Ifool would have asked Barry that question were she "moderating" a debate?
BTW if Axelrod doesn't make your skin crawl you must be made of alabaster.
If a badger were actually a particularly repellant reptile rather than a mammal its discoverer would have named it davidus axelrodus.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 02, 2012 at 12:31 PM
Inviting the Bloomberg reporter was the first mistake, good god that publication has gone fully Frum, why even call attention to Missouri, but I'm no top rocket surgeon, like him.
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 12:32 PM
These are the same genius's that thought European debt was a solid MF Global play.
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 12:34 PM
If Bain is so evil, why do so many unions put their retirement funds there? And Oprah and Mrs. John Kerry and....
Posted by: DebinNC | September 02, 2012 at 12:34 PM
Iggy, given your pictoral comparison of ValJar, would a fight between her and Mr Whipple be a cobra versus mongoose type thingy?
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 02, 2012 at 12:36 PM
Ignatz:
"Yeah, as long as we recognize Rove and the others still shooting at Akin, are part of the circle."
I don't think anybody can question Captain Hate's bona fides on that score!
In the Akin case, I think Reince Preibus' declaration that Akin wouldn't get a dime from the RNC is far more serious than Rove's unfunny joke. I don't know what the practicable cut off date for repealing and replacing Akin is, but if the official funding raising arm of the Republican Party, itself, lets voters go to the polls without attacking Claire McCaskill, it really will be indefensible, IMO. I am such an admirer of what Preibus' has managed to accomplish in an extraordinarily brief span of time, but that would be a whole different category of offense than simply speaking his own mind.
While I've begun to doubt the wisdom of repeatedly setting our collective hair on fire about issues like this one, I do think strongly worded missives to the RNC Chairman are in order.
Posted by: JM Hanes | September 02, 2012 at 12:42 PM
--Iggy, given your pictoral comparison of ValJar, would a fight between her and Mr Whipple be a cobra versus mongoose type thingy?
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 02, 2012 at 12:36 PM--
Actually CH, I hope it would be more like the crazy, nasty ass Honey Badger vs the cobra thing, except the Honey Badger after chewing the head off the snake doesn't quite pull through. :)
Posted by: Ignatz | September 02, 2012 at 12:50 PM
--In the Akin case, I think Reince Preibus' declaration that Akin wouldn't get a dime from the RNC is far more serious than Rove's unfunny joke.--
I agree JM, which is why I made the perhaps dubious but very satisfying comparison between Akin and Ryan on the Ryan marathon thread about the RNC cutting Romney/Ryan off even if they're tied because of what Ryan said.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 02, 2012 at 12:55 PM
--While I've begun to doubt the wisdom of repeatedly setting our collective hair on fire about issues like this one...--
Come, join me on the Alfred E. Neuman dark side, JM.
We may neither see nor care that there's a freight train bearing down on us but at least we'll have all our hair when it hits.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 02, 2012 at 12:59 PM
2016 is playing in the brand new theater in my little town. I think I will go to the 2:30 show.
Posted by: Jane - It's gonna be a Tsunami in November | September 02, 2012 at 01:00 PM
Cool, Jane. Report back, please.
Posted by: centralcal | September 02, 2012 at 01:01 PM
Romney 48, Obama 47 in the Gallup rolling seven-day average. Two-point switch from yesterday, so the most recent day must have been pretty good for RR.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 02, 2012 at 01:05 PM
In an effort to push Obama across the finish line, MSNBC has announced that they will not broadcast any speeches from minorities during the convention.
Posted by: Threadkiller | September 02, 2012 at 01:06 PM
INstalaunche!!!!!!!
Posted by: Jane - It's gonna be a Tsunami in November | September 02, 2012 at 01:07 PM
I almost ran over one of the MSNBC broadcast crew today on the way to church. Strong resemblance to either Ed Schulz or Chris Matthews. Sort of rusty looking, some freckles and a strong diamond pattern but it turned out to be a cotton mouth snake. Missed it by a few inches as it wiggled its across the road into bushes.
Posted by: Jack is Back | September 02, 2012 at 01:10 PM
How many watched Tom Friedman this morning
Not this morning, or any morning.
Posted by: PD | September 02, 2012 at 01:15 PM
Of course they would interview Zandi, darts have a better trackrecord;
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/economy/247081-experts-say-economy-should-grow-despite-who-wins-white-house-in-november
Posted by: narciso | September 02, 2012 at 01:16 PM
I know I forgot to mention how smart Ann Romney is to have rejected a Vogue magazine spread on her.
I hope this is an indication of how the RR team plans to deal with media filth.
Posted by: Clarice | September 02, 2012 at 01:16 PM
The thing about Akin's and Rove's remarks is that, although we might overlook them, why should we have to? Why did they say such stupid stuff in the first place?
Posted by: PD | September 02, 2012 at 01:18 PM
Clarice:
I've been trying to do a little remedial work on the whole count-to-ten thing, but it does help to see my primal scream being put to constructive use in a larger context. I think cracks in the load-bearing media walls are really starting to show, and we owe that to strong, focused columns like yours.
Of course, being quoted by you also leaves me with a ridiculously pleased smile on my face!
Posted by: JM Hanes | September 02, 2012 at 01:18 PM
My husband and I enjoyed 2016. It's a bit cheesy in some areas where they are trying to visually demonstrate some things, but I'm sure that was due to budgetary constraints.
It's basically a documentary arguing that Obama's worldview and actions can be understood through the lens of anti-colonialism he absorbed from stories about his father, his mother, his mentors, and his left-wing education. (Starting with returning the Churchill bust... to giving money to Brazil & Mexico to drill while blocking the U.S. from drilling...to reducing our nuclear arsenal... to intentionally pushing America off the fiscal cliff.)
He doesn't see the U.S. as a force for good and wants to destroy our dominance in the world.
I'm going to make my 16 year old go see it.
Posted by: C.R. | September 02, 2012 at 01:21 PM
Aw, shucks, JMH. You know you're my real favorite.
Posted by: Clarice | September 02, 2012 at 01:24 PM
If your house costs $35 million are you part of the 1%?
http://hillbuzz.org/who-is-funding-the-purchase-of-the-35-million-beachfront-hawaiian-estate-for-barack-and-michelle-obama-to-move-into-come-january-2013-2013
"The woman who is organizing the funding of the Obama’s post-presidential estate is Penny Pritzker"
My guess is that they have figured out some way for the US taxpayers to pay for it.
Posted by: pagar | September 02, 2012 at 01:26 PM
The dark side? With you, Ignatz? Put me down as a yes.
Posted by: JM Hanes | September 02, 2012 at 01:27 PM
--Why did they say such stupid stuff in the first place?
Posted by: PD | September 02, 2012 at 01:18 PM--
Show of hands for who hasn't said something really stupid, especially within range of a microphone.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 02, 2012 at 01:31 PM
Narc, that's zandI. (I worked at the same firm many moons ago, and the women who worked near him always emphasized that).
Posted by: henry | September 02, 2012 at 01:35 PM
--The dark side? With you, Ignatz? Put me down as a yes.--
Welcome, JM, welcome.

We believe in the promise of America where there is neither a wrong nor a right side of the tracks and where we are free to stand athwart history yelling.....well you know our motto.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 02, 2012 at 01:40 PM
Sort of rusty looking, some freckles and a strong diamond pattern but it turned out to be a cotton mouth snake.
That's great!
I saw Friedman. He made me barf.
Poor AB - I hope the Obama house is on a different island.
Posted by: Jane - It's gonna be a Tsunami in November | September 02, 2012 at 01:40 PM
No, it was O up 1 today still I think in gallup.
Posted by: bio mom | September 02, 2012 at 01:50 PM
Hey TM, if you are around will you post a National #emptychairday" thread?
Thanks!
Posted by: Jane - It's gonna be a Tsunami in November | September 02, 2012 at 01:51 PM
That house for the Obams almost rivalsTom Friedman's.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 02, 2012 at 01:53 PM
OT and bizarre but below is the Venezuelan poodle moth;

Question;
If one flew in Barry's mouth, would he spit or swallow?
Posted by: Ignatz | September 02, 2012 at 01:55 PM
"August is Chicago's deadliest month of the year
Fifty-five homicides have been recorded so far this month in Chicago, making August the deadliest month of the year, a RedEye analysis of preliminary police data found."
http://homicides.redeyechicago.com/
Posted by: Dont Shoot | September 02, 2012 at 01:55 PM
Show of hands for who hasn't said something really stupid, especially within range of a microphone.
*That* stupid? C'mon.
Nevertheless, I'm willing to stipulate that this is minor stuff, and a distraction from the central thing in this election:
Obama is the issue
Posted by: PD | September 02, 2012 at 01:57 PM
Question;
If one flew in Barry's mouth, would he spit or swallow?
He, the moth, would spit.
Posted by: PD | September 02, 2012 at 01:59 PM
Jane,
What's the plan for Monday? Do we post our chair on Twitter at #emptychairday? Then what? Also post here? Make a YouTube video and post it?
Posted by: Jack is Back | September 02, 2012 at 02:01 PM
What if I put a bucket of sand on the chair?
Posted by: MarkO | September 02, 2012 at 02:03 PM
I have a large granite bolder. Will I be called a "racist".?
Posted by: Agent J | September 02, 2012 at 02:08 PM
What are the tax consequences if someone else buys you a $35 million house?
Posted by: Ignatz | September 02, 2012 at 02:10 PM
Most of you ar way too young to remember this :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDXT7wC9jrc
Posted by: Clarice | September 02, 2012 at 02:10 PM
You're right, bio mom. I misread the 46 as 48. Should have used my magnifier.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 02, 2012 at 02:18 PM
Facebook, JiB.
Posted by: matt | September 02, 2012 at 02:21 PM
I'd like to hear what TC says, but I believe the someone else owes gift tax on $35 Mil.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 02, 2012 at 02:21 PM
Either one of my Facebook friends is on JoM, which is entirely possible, or Empty Chair Day is going viral.LUN
Posted by: matt | September 02, 2012 at 02:26 PM
Boy, did I misread this line (above) at first: ...Representative John Boehner, the House speaker, delivered a vigorous and sharply focused speech that sent the audience into ear-splitting roars
Posted by: Jim Ryan | September 02, 2012 at 02:29 PM