You can't tell the generals without a scorecard as Gen. Petraeus (Ret.) is joined in scandal by Gen. John Allen. All this brass and... well, let's segue back to Benghazi and try to anticipate some possible Team Obama spin.
Suppose (*SUPPOSE*) this report holds up and the atack on the consulate and annex was an attempt to free some Libyan militants from an off-the-books CIA detention center (ostensibly barred by an Obama Executive Order.) Very embarrassing for the CIA. And it might explain the non-response from the Pentagon when the consulate was attacked - the CIA would have been delighted to get aerial support but having the US military put their muddy boots inside a non-existent non-allowed CIA detention center might have created some awkward moments.
And the CIA evaluation of the attacker's motives may have been skewed by their desire to keep their little secret:
A few days later, Petraeus testified in a closed session to Congress that the attack was due in large part to an anti-Islam video and a spontaneous uprising, according to reports from the hearing.
Congressional leaders say privately they believe they were lied to by Petraeus when he testified shortly after the attack.
And of course Susan Rice made her many statements on Sept 16 blaming the video, claiming to have relied on intelligence community talking points.
Implausible though it may seem, she may be telling the truth. Of course, the CIA's desire to cover up the attacker's real motives ran parallel to the Administration's desire to cover up the notion that an actual terrorist attack on the 9/11 anniversary had been missed.
GREAT MINDS RUN IN THE SAME CHANNEL (Fools think alike): James Taranto makes the same case more powerfully. Hmm - there is no way we are the only two people to whom this has ocurred. The Benghazi hearings may move the dial up to eleven.
TEMPORARY DETENTION, OR, WHAT'S A SPY TO DO? I assume the CIA has some right to hold prisoners briefly pending a transfer to the appropriate authorities. Who those authorities might be in Libya is an interesting question. And when does 'temporary' become long-term?
AT DiploMad - "The Petraeus scandal is a sideshow. Those of us who want to know what happened and why in Benghazi need to focus. Keep asking the basic questions. I have provided some of them and you can peruse the archive log for the many pieces on Benghazi.
Why was it Rice and not Clinton who appeared before the press? Who wrote the talking points for Ambassador Rice? What was the facility in Benghazi? If it was important, why wasn't it protected? Why was the Ambassador there on 9/11? What was the meeting with the Turkish official about? Were we "walking guns" to Syria's rebels?..."
Posted by: Janet | November 13, 2012 at 07:29 PM
Jim Ryan, its
harddifficult to write while under the desk.Posted by: henry | November 13, 2012 at 07:29 PM
Ok, this doesn't pass the leugh test, Vern missed those breathless tracts of prose, when
she narrated her runs with Petraeus, among other moments, he had to suspect
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 07:35 PM
Broadwell didn't even actually write the biography herself!
I'm sure she helped quite a bit, JMH.
There's been a video circulating where Broadwell and ghostwriter appear at an interview/book signing, and ghostwriter's body language is rather telling. Broadwell does all the talking about "her" book and ghostwriter twists nervously in his chair the entire time, ruffling his own hair and wringing his hands. I guess I was incorrect, but I thought his gestures implied his knowledge of the affair. Perhaps he was just annoyed to find himself ignored throughout.
Posted by: (A) nuther Bub | November 13, 2012 at 07:36 PM
From Gretawire blog:
I see from Brit Hume tweets that Bill Kristol and Chas Krauthammer both opined that Gen. Allen was being "smeared." Looks like some anonymice are doing what they can to add to the tawdry speculation.
Posted by: centralcal | November 13, 2012 at 07:37 PM
--If you know how to resize or reduce your photos, make them no wider than 5 1/2 inches (or 396 pixels), and they'll fit into the columns here without getting cut off on the righthand side.--
Momto2 was just posting the version Petraeus keeps on [under?] his desk.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | November 13, 2012 at 07:41 PM
Wait, she has West Point, JFK School, U. Denver degrees and soon King's College London PhD. But she can't write well?
You might be surprised how many highly credentialed people can't write fluently.
Posted by: Captain Hate | November 13, 2012 at 07:41 PM
Janet, I believe Petraeus wasn't told to go for moral reasons. He was told to go because he had placed himself in a position where he might be subject to blackmail. That's very poor judgment.
I shudder to think of the amount of power the American people have surrendered to people like those who run our largest institutions.
Posted by: Danube of Thought on IPad | November 13, 2012 at 07:41 PM
daddy,
Does this qualify as another, "Look squirrel," tactic>
Posted by: Barbara | November 13, 2012 at 07:43 PM
DoT, He thought he could stay if he"went along" with what O wanted him to say. BUT, as usual, O threw him under the bus. Don't forget how Obama won his senate seat in Illinois.
Posted by: sailor | November 13, 2012 at 07:44 PM
Also, Captain - writing is a "talent" that education alone cannot bestow. Our own commenter daddy is a great example of said talent, as are others here.
Posted by: centralcal | November 13, 2012 at 07:46 PM
It sure sounds like it was crowded under that desk.
Posted by: Barbara | November 13, 2012 at 07:46 PM
Yes, nut they only did so, when his testimomny was coming up before Capitol Hill, all the while before, they used him as a totem. They sent him on that fact finding trip, or something,
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 07:49 PM
she had the magic access card; West Point, Army officer, JFK School, etc, and she was hawt to a bunch of middle aged officers. She's also an Alpha from what I read so she fit in.
Petraeus had a habit of surrounding himself with very bright people including the press at times. He is very open door and wants to hear from people. He processes it all very rapidly and can spit out 10 word summaries/orders at ninja speed.
Posted by: matt | November 13, 2012 at 07:53 PM
Matt,
I am a big Petraeus fan for his intellect, leadership, hard ass decisiveness and other laudable attributes as a commander. But in profile he is a nerd and you know how easy it is to seduce a nerd which I believe has happened here.
I wonder when someone will start to speculate on the Lebanese connection and whether there is a Hezbollah relative in the family?
Posted by: Jack is Back | November 13, 2012 at 08:00 PM
--He is very open door...--
The jokes write themselves.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | November 13, 2012 at 08:00 PM
Brig. General Jeffrey Sinclair is another general gone wild.
Posted by: DebinNC | November 13, 2012 at 08:03 PM
I'd go so far as to guarantee that almost 100% of our political "leaders" are regularly tempted by groupies, Henry Waxman being the only exception. It's just a fact, and I would guess that at least 75% avail themselves of the opportunity at some point, the remainder being in torrid love affairs with their own wives.
Point being, I know we'd like to think otherwise but Petraeus's weakness isn't even slightly out of the ordinary; i.e., this is clearly a setup.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 13, 2012 at 08:05 PM
Jeez,
Even JOM is going all commie now.
I've got the League of Conservation voters badgering me to thank Barry for leading us to a clean energy future on my right sidebar, Verengo solar telling me to get a zero down quote subsidized of course by Barry using my money and Americans for Tax Fairness telling me that W's tax cuts for millionaires are still hurting America on my left.
"Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come."
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | November 13, 2012 at 08:07 PM
The one and only politician with no groupies:
Posted by: Extraneus | November 13, 2012 at 08:08 PM
It's not a setup, except to the extent he set himself up. Hell, if some of the theories espoused here are valid, he's more dangerous to Obama now than he was at Langley.
Posted by: Danube of Thought on IPad | November 13, 2012 at 08:19 PM
From Newsbusters--Dr K:
"CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: I think the really shocking news today was that General Petraeus thought and hoped he could keep his job. He thought that it might and it would be kept secret, and that he could stay in his position. I think what that tells us is really important. It meant that he understood that the FBI obviously knew what was going on. He was hoping that those administration officials would not disclose what had happened, and therefore hoping that he would keep his job. And that meant that he understood that his job, his reputation, his legacy, his whole celebrated life was in the hands of the administration, and he expected they would protect him by keeping it quiet.
And that brings us to the ultimate issue, and that is his testimony on September 13. That’s the thing that connects the two scandals, and that’s the only thing that makes the sex scandal relevant. Otherwise it would be an exercise in sensationalism and voyeurism and nothing else. The reason it’s important is here’s a man who knows the administration holds his fate in its hands, and he gives testimony completely at variance with what the Secretary of Defense had said the day before, at variance with what he’d heard from his station chief in Tripoli, and with everything that we had heard. Was he influenced by the fact that he knew his fate was held by people within the administration at that time?"
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/11/13/krauthammer-white-house-held-affair-over-petraeuss-head-favorable-tes#ixzz2C9fufvTG
I believe he;s the first to say this so bluntly.
Posted by: Clarice | November 13, 2012 at 08:19 PM
It now appears that Petraeus thought he could keep his job and that the affair would not become public. He thought that at the time he testified to the untruth about the video.
Who here said he was not blackmailed? Were you expecting a note in crayon? He is reputed to be a man of great honor. Such a man would have resigned. Why are we defending him? He clearly took the Administration's line when it wasn't true. We may now have stumbled on the reason.
Posted by: MarkO | November 13, 2012 at 08:19 PM
Yes, ever since I read that September 14th, statement, 'something stinks in the land of Denmark' Mueller seems to have lost control of his outfit as well,
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 08:25 PM
Yeah -- he should have twigged to what was happening when she described the two of them ending their runs "breathless, sweat-covered, limbs intertwined".
Posted by: Rob Crawford | November 13, 2012 at 08:28 PM
"Does this qualify as another, "Look squirrel," tactic>"
Has anyone mentioned that this entire mess could have been created and put on a back
burner for when it was needed to get rid of a straight arrow by the Obama regime.
It sounds pretty far out but Vince Flynn, Brad Thor etc come up with this kind of stuff in every book. The ladies have a history of shady charities, money need etc.
how hard would it be to find a leftist to exploit them and set this up.
Surprises me that Narciso hasn't read the book detailing how to do it.
Narciso, I want to thank you again for all the great authors like Charles McCarry, that you have mentioned that I had never read before and enjoyed because of you.
Posted by: pagar | November 13, 2012 at 08:30 PM
Then again, he works for the Post, awareness of their environment is not their strong suit,
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 08:30 PM
Wrong:
Posted by: Rob Crawford | November 13, 2012 at 08:31 PM
Dammit. Ruined a half-assed joke. That was supposed to be the answer to Waxman not having groupies.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | November 13, 2012 at 08:31 PM
I do wonder how Petraeus feels knowing his advancement of the party line helped put a man in prison.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | November 13, 2012 at 08:33 PM
Why would anyone suppose Petraeus was offered the DCI post without this being known by those making the offer? He laid down with dogs but he brought his own fleas and he would never have been offered the post without them.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | November 13, 2012 at 08:35 PM
Hope you're feeling better pagar, so the Khawams have ties in both parties, Kerry and
Whitehouse, that corrupt hack from Don Thomas's burg, and Charmin' Charlie and Pam Bondi, on the other hand,
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 08:36 PM
Obama has scored a "three-fer" with this conveniently timed "l'affaire Petraeus" scandal. . .
1- Distracting everyone from the Benghazi deaths and his and Hillary's culpability.
2- Publicly destroying Gen. Petraeus' and Gen. Allen's reputations, while damaging the military.
3- Distracting everyone from the election results and the voter fraud issues.
Posted by: Patriot4Freedom | November 13, 2012 at 08:37 PM
It seems they take lessons from all over the world;
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/333227/how-morsi-took-power-egypt-daniel-pipes#
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 08:40 PM
I have to say, Ext, that picture of Waxman gave me a double take. I thought, wow, what an amazing photographer! That's the only picture of him that I've ever seen where he actually looks like a member of our species!
Posted by: cathyf | November 13, 2012 at 08:42 PM
This "scandal" needs a catchy Hollywood name . . .
How about " As the Squirrels Turn " ?
Posted by: Patriot4Freedom | November 13, 2012 at 08:42 PM
Looks we're closer to the goal;
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/13/allen-west-not-ready-to-concede-in-florida/
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 08:43 PM
narciso -- the scary thing about that idea is that the Obama left were over there helping the Muslim Brotherhood pull off the final stages.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | November 13, 2012 at 08:45 PM
Roger Stone, just refuses to stop tormenting us;
http://shark-tank.net/2012/11/12/johnson-gets-1-2-million-votes-45900-in-sunshine-state/
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 08:46 PM
Gee, when JFK was screwing everything in sight, his wife told us it was "Camelot."
Guess Holly Petraeus needs a really good romanticized literary reference too.
Posted by: centralcal | November 13, 2012 at 08:51 PM
"Why would anyone suppose Petraeus was offered the DCI post without this being known by those making the offer?"
Until I see evidence that they did know, that's exactly what I would suppose.
Posted by: Danube of Thought on IPad | November 13, 2012 at 08:53 PM
DoT at 6:09 - I'm with you on the choice of surgeon.
"I still think the "under the desk" detail was a shot across the bow to warn Petraeus to behave.
Wouldn't a manly-man go *on* the desk?
Just askin'...
...unless there are extra points for flexibility.
Posted by: Frau Hahnrei | November 13, 2012 at 08:55 PM
"Brig. General Jeffrey Sinclair is"
I have long forgotten the sequence (someone here will know it) all General officers have to go thru a promotion system that Includes the President and Congress. How straight arrows ever get approved with Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, John Kerry, Tom Harkin,
"While running for his Senate seat in 1984, and again while running for the Democratic presidential nomination in 1992, Harkin has faced criticism for claiming that he had flown combat missions over North Vietnam."
From Wiki--
Plus now we have senators who don't pay their hookers and get reelected, senators who get a little help from sources that use their Boys and Girls Club assets. Now we apparently have added fake Indians practicing law without the proper licenses.
Hard to believe morals are carefully checked.
Posted by: pagar | November 13, 2012 at 08:57 PM
Wait, she has West Point, JFK School, U. Denver degrees and soon King's College London PhD. But she can't write well?
Jesus, Jim, you've read dissertations.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | November 13, 2012 at 08:58 PM
Thomas Lipscomb on FB seems to think Petraeus is getting his just deserts as he, too, assumes Petraeus lied.
"Thomas Lipscomb
DON'T CRY FOR THEM, AMERICA... the troops are glad to see them gone....
Both Allen and Petraeus are STAFF officers.... Petraeus doesn't have a single combat medal and never heard anything but a champagne cork fired in anger till he was 50. He has an infantry qualification badge he doesn't wear because wearing it makes it clear that he DOESN'T have the hard won Combat Infantry Badge that even Oliver Stone earned.
And the troops in Afghanistan regard Allen as a high ranking REMF who gets them killed following the kind of insane rules of engagement dreamed up by the girlies in the Obama WH who like our crypto gay mayor of NY find the carrying of weapons by troops just TOO TOO UTTERLY BELLIGERENT and DISCOURTEOUS .
Thomas Lipscomb And let me double down. I'd prefer a Jane Harmon who at least is conscientious and will work hard to learn her job at CIA over a know it all like Petraeus who it appears may have lied in testimony to save his own professional skin at the expense of DUTY, HONOR, AND COUNTRY when the chips are down."
____I'm in no position to know how the troops feel ut I can't believe that he didn't know the video story was carp...
Posted by: Clarice | November 13, 2012 at 08:59 PM
I shudder to think of the amount of power the American people have surrendered to people like those who run our largest institutions.
Yeah, imagine a flag officer getting a little something on the side (*cough*)Eisenhower(*cough*).
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | November 13, 2012 at 09:00 PM
That's their story
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/13/carney-obama-wasnt-pleased-with-petraeus-scandal-when-he-found-out-just-after-the-election/
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 09:01 PM
I wonder when someone will start to speculate on the Lebanese connection and whether there is a Hezbollah relative in the family?
Looks like about 8PM today.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | November 13, 2012 at 09:01 PM
Kafka called, knock it off;
http://twitchy.com/2012/11/13/facepalm-jill-kelley-wants-diplomatic-protection/
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 09:06 PM
Yeah, Chaco.
Don't miss Spengler today:
http://pjmedia.com/spengler/2012/11/13/petraeus-and-the-failure-of-american-intelligence/?singlepage=true
Posted by: Clarice | November 13, 2012 at 09:09 PM
I used to think the press would keep us informed and keep the government honest--because who else do we have to reveal the illegal, the indefensible, the corrupt? After these past 25 years, I no longer labor under that delusion.
In the early morning hours today I kept wondering, worrying, who can prevent the corruption in elections, who can expose the dirty machinations in this administration, who can help us, and I thought, 'people with power.' Who has the power? Congress...our senators and representatives...they're the only people with the power to defeat this leftward slide, this descent into socialism and even worse.' There are three branches of government, after all. Congress can hold hearings and keep the leftists from running over us, ruining the economy, foisting terrible problems onto us. The Tea Party must stay together. It must grow, become more powerful, elect more congressmen.
Because if they don't, then we'll keep being led by Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank, et al.
Unless people in Massachusetts, Illinois, and other blue states who keep electing socialists don't wake up, we are never going to have a "governor" or brake on the madness in our capital.
And, Henry Waxman is the most nasally, repulsive man ever to be photographed. :)
Posted by: Joan | November 13, 2012 at 09:22 PM
"Yeah, imagine a flag officer getting a little something on the side (*cough*)Eisenhower(*cough*)."
I wasn't talking about Ike's (alleged) discreet affair with his driver in 1944. I was talking about (a) a general in the age of twitter, facebook and e-mail leaving a huge electronic trail of evidence of his relationship with an evident psycho; (b) an FBI in which a loose cannon agent can persuade his colleagues to pursue an investigation in the absence of probable cause, and then improperly disclose his discoveries to someone in congress; and (c) an FBI Director who, when presented with the information, doesn't know what to do with it, so he punts it.
I don't ask that my flag and general officers be chaste (see, e.g., Horatio Nelson and Lady Hamilton). I ask that they not be recklessly stupid.
Posted by: Danube of Thought on IPad | November 13, 2012 at 09:24 PM
Good summation, DoT. Now go read Spengler. You won't regret it.
Posted by: Clarice | November 13, 2012 at 09:25 PM
Of frabjous joy;
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/11/obama-to-hold-press-conference-tuesday-to-lie-some-more-talk-about-benghazi-protest-massacre/
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 09:29 PM
Interesting point. His base has sort of gotten used to Gitmo being open, drone wars, assassinating US citizens, and an expanded role in Afghanistan (he killed Bin Laden!), so would they really care about the reinstatement of yet another Bush-era program?
Well. I can't think like a swing voter.
Posted by: Tom Maguire | November 13, 2012 at 09:30 PM
I can't think like a swing voter either, but his campaign it seemed to me was designed to buck up the base (which probably doesn't quite catch on he's following Bush on these things) and pandering to enough (mostly ill-informed ) voter tranches to get more than half of the electoral pie and this would have cost him I think.
Posted by: Clarice | November 13, 2012 at 09:34 PM
The quote Chaco was referring to was this;
Doesn't seem to me to be a naive observation on human nature but rather a concern that we have surrendered a great deal more power to these people with the feet of clay than ever before.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | November 13, 2012 at 09:35 PM
According to The Blaze, Chaco was right on target--Kos is suggesting the Jill Kelley and her sisters on Middle eastern spies.
Posted by: Clarice | November 13, 2012 at 09:35 PM
I have NO brief with conspiracy theories - or theorists - by and large . . .
However, there is very little reason, given the experience of the past four years, to believe that AG Holder did NOT notify Pres. Obama of the FBI investigation into Petraeus, imo.
Posted by: Patriot4Freedom | November 13, 2012 at 09:41 PM
More nostrilly than nasally. Nasal is when the passages are narrow or constricted. No sign of that in his case.
Posted by: Jim Ryan | November 13, 2012 at 10:05 PM
well, those nostrils are scary, no matter what we call them. I still lean toward nasal too because I think the passages get bigger and bigger as they head for his brain...probably where his brains leaked out.
Posted by: Joan | November 13, 2012 at 10:10 PM
Henry Waxman being the only exception
How dare you assume blind women can't be ambitiously slutty!
Holly P does look like the epitome of frump NOW--anyone seen a photo of her from the 70's? Broadwell sure likes to show off her arms--like another JOM favorite.
Posted by: Ralph L | November 13, 2012 at 10:22 PM
"there is very little reason, given the experience of the past four years, to believe that AG Holder did NOT notify Pres. Obama of the FBI investigation into Petraeus"
First let's establish that Holder knew about it. The whole thing was being conducted by gnomes in Tampa who had no idea what they were doing, or why they were doing it.
Posted by: Danube of Thought on IPad | November 13, 2012 at 10:40 PM
I don't think Cahaco was taking that notion seriously, do we even know the Khawam's religion
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 10:44 PM
Agreed, DoT.
Thanks for the Thomas Lipscomb FB comments, Clarice. I did not know that Petraeus did not "have a single combat medal."
Posted by: Barbara | November 13, 2012 at 10:48 PM
DoT
I think I read where holder knew.
Posted by: Sue | November 13, 2012 at 10:51 PM
Yes he did know, as did Brennan his policy rival,
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 10:54 PM
narciso, I'm certain he didn't take that notion seriously and was just saying that was about to be the next tack showing up somewhere.
Posted by: Clarice | November 13, 2012 at 11:00 PM
Seriously, this is what it was about, it's lean Mean Girls in Temapa and points north
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2232133/David-Petraeus-affair-The-cat-fight-emails-sent-Paula-Broadwell-supposed-love-rival-Jill-Kelley.html
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 11:07 PM
I did not know that Petraeus did not "have a single combat medal."
The US Army didn't see much combat between 1974 (IIRC the year he graduated) and 2003. A week in Desert Storm? A small mess in Somalia. Amazingly little combat in Bosnia.
What still I can't understand is why Casey & Abizaid resurrected the failed Westmoreland strategy--and why Rumsfeld & Bush agreed.
Posted by: Ralph L | November 13, 2012 at 11:11 PM
A little background on Natalie Khawam
Natalie Khawam brings an insider's view of the government's prosecution of healthcare Qui Tam matters, having worked at the Office of the General Counsel for the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Ms. Khawam is experienced in Medicare and Medicaid fraud and has analyzed such cases for the centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in conjunction with the Office of the Inspector General.
http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Khawam_Natalie_1396475316.aspx
Posted by: Rocco | November 13, 2012 at 11:12 PM
"Yes he did know, as did Brennan his policy rival,"
In each case, when and how? And what did each do with the information, and how do we know?
I think it is a good idea to think of all of these dopes much more as the gang that couldn't shoot straight than as the omnipotent schemers who can deceive us at every turn.
Go back to George Tenet's "slam dunk" and take it from there. Or, if you have the stomach for it, go back to the Best and the Brightest. Just because you're really smart doesn't mean you aren't a stupid shit.
Posted by: Danube of Thought on IPad | November 13, 2012 at 11:16 PM
Nite all. I'm Tampa girled out . XOXO
Posted by: Clarice | November 13, 2012 at 11:21 PM
Narciso
I believe the Khawam's are Catholic.
But Kelley’s brother, David Khawam, said neither of his sisters had anything but a social relationship with Petraeus. He said Jill is a born giver who early on channeled her efforts into political fundraising and later to the military.
It is a quality, he said, born of the Catholic family’s persecution in their native Lebanon; when he, Jill and Natalie were small children, the family fled to the United States, he said. They built a productive new life in America. “We feel we owe everything we have to this country,” David Khawam said. “We’re extremely patriotic.”
But get this, same article
A military officer who is a former member of Petraeus’s staff said Kelley was a “self-appointed” go-between for Central Command officers with Lebanese and other Middle Eastern officials.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/tampa-woman-was-hostess-to-the-military-but-had-deep-financial-troubles/2012/11/13/45cea33c-2d19-11e2-9ac2-1c61452669c3_story_1.html
Posted by: Rocco | November 13, 2012 at 11:22 PM
Well, between Lipscomb and Spengler's brutal Petraeus colonoscopy, my former image of the General's glorious accomplishments and persona have been summarily diminished.
Posted by: OldTimer | November 13, 2012 at 11:27 PM
Well, Eisenhower never heard a shot fired in anger before WWII, and he seems to have done OK.
Posted by: xbradtc | November 13, 2012 at 11:30 PM
Ms. Khawam is experienced in Medicare and Medicaid fraud
As a perp?
Rocco, no doubt the Kelleys expected to be paid by one side or the other.
Posted by: Ralph L | November 13, 2012 at 11:31 PM
*has* been ...
Posted by: OldTimer | November 13, 2012 at 11:31 PM
Petraeus was probably closest to Edwin Lansdalr,vwho was good at initially cultivating
locale leadership like Diem and Magsaysay, a smarter strategy than Westmoreland's S& D.
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 11:36 PM
This is one account
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/333206/justice-knew-about-petraeuss-affair-summer-patrick-brennan
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 11:43 PM
And this is the other;
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/12/petraeus-mistress-may-have-revealed-classified-information-at-denver-speech/
Posted by: narciso | November 13, 2012 at 11:55 PM
Clarice,
Thanks for the Krauthammer post at 08:19.
That is a very important question to ask---What was going thru Patreaus's head during his testimony, when he knew that the Administration knew about his affair in sordid detail, and he knew what type of testimony would be beneficial to them?
Don't know if we'll ever get the answer to that but I'm glad Dr K asked it.
Posted by: daddy | November 14, 2012 at 12:40 AM
Mea culpa.
In my Nostrilitus comment of 8:05, I misused the term "set-up." I don't think Petraeus was set up by any spies or insiders or anything like that. It's all on him that he did what he did and stupidly exposed himself to discovery. I do, however, question the timing of his resignation and, even more so, the leaking of titillating details like "under the desk."
He could have been allowed to resign quietly. Instead, we get this coincidental timing, sex scandal circus, and a man's ruined reputation. It just seems suspicious.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 14, 2012 at 06:20 AM
It certainly does, Ext/
Posted by: Clarice | November 14, 2012 at 08:02 AM
"He could have been allowed to resign quietly. Instead, we get this coincidental timing, sex scandal circus, and a man's ruined reputation. It just seems suspicious."
----------------------
And if he was allowed to resign quietly we'd have every anti-Obama nutcase screaming (rightly) that there was a cover up of a major breach of security.
Full disclosure is the way to go. May be unseemly and a waste, but nothing suspicious about it.
Don't like it? Then keep your dick in your pants. That's the lesson.
Posted by: moxieman | November 14, 2012 at 08:15 AM
I agree, Extraneus - sort of. I doesn't "seem" suspicious, it is. Obama and his cronies have a track record for doing this sort of thing to anyone who doesn't toe their line.
Posted by: centralcal | November 14, 2012 at 08:25 AM
I = It. Ach - more coffee.
Posted by: centralcal | November 14, 2012 at 08:25 AM
Was interrupted last night and did not get the chance to hear the entire segment, but John Batchelor had an excellent discussion on Benghazi, Petraeus, etc. during the second hour, more detailed than first, synopsis follows:
Podcast available here:
http://wabcradio.com/sectional.asp?id=33447
Posted by: Sandy Daze | November 14, 2012 at 08:45 AM
Understand that Kelly's entertainment soirees continued for years and years, well predating Petraeus at CENTCOM (October 13, 2008, to June 30, 2010), and continuing right up to this past weekend, where reliable information relates that Flag(s) were attending yet another soiree at the Kelly home.
Journos are currently reviewing the TB Trib and other local papers' social pages for info on who attended the Kelly get-togethers and when. Lots of names will come out, safe to say that virtually anyone senior in Tampa over the last few years will have visited.
Posted by: Sandy Daze | November 14, 2012 at 08:50 AM
Gosh, perhaps if Petraeus were gay (errr, homosexual), his behavior would have been approved, or at least not been used against him.
Posted by: Sandy Daze | November 14, 2012 at 08:52 AM
Rick B's comment (November 13, 2012 at 08:35 PM) last night is worthy of repeat:
Why would anyone suppose Petraeus was offered
the DCI post without this being known
by those making the offer?
He laid down with dogs but he brought
his own fleas and he would never
have been offered the post without them.
Posted by: Sandy Daze | November 14, 2012 at 08:56 AM
Petraeus served from the mid-70's onwards. Not many wars going on. By the time Desert Storm rolled around his unit(187th Rakkasans - Airborne) was not picked to go. This was also when he took an accidental discharge in the chest and almost died.
Once you're beyond Major, no CIB for you. Petraeus has been at the sharp end of the stick throughout his career. He commanded the 101st Airborne in Mosul, which was wild west, and got it under control using the same tactics and strategy he would later use in the Surge. He would walk through the markets with no body armor when everyone else was armored up.He leads by example.
I believe he felt it was his duty to take CIA at the request of his president. It fits his history.
Posted by: matt | November 14, 2012 at 10:18 AM
I'll take "someplace I'd rather be" for $1000, please, Alex...
Posted by: Sandy Daze | November 14, 2012 at 01:27 PM
When I read JMH's Somali link it made me recall this:
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | November 15, 2012 at 01:52 AM
And this:
which cryptic poster always referenced ala plame...
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | November 15, 2012 at 02:02 AM
And I didn't catch this in his wiki...two themes cryptic played up
After school, Granville joined the Peace Corps and was sent to Cameroon for two years....As a diplomat, Granville worked for the United States Agency for International Development in Kenya and Sudan.
----
Foley became a Peace Corps Volunteer in 1965 serving two years in India upon graduating from the University of Massachusetts...
...Foley became Supervisory Executive Officer of USAID/Jordan in 2000.
----
J. Christopher Stevens...
from 1983 to 1985, he taught English as a Peace Corps volunteer in Morocco.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | November 15, 2012 at 02:12 AM
All were peace corp, then US Diplos
USAID is code for US Checkbook/Dealmakers in my mind and 2 of those title fell under it
It's a puzzle and not sure if it plays into this, but damn curious coincidences cryptic played up.
I even remember a cryptic post wherein they mentioned the going ons in "the tampa bar"
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | November 15, 2012 at 02:28 AM
One thing ...A lot of Peace Corps volunteers go on to USAID or the FAS (foreign Ag. service). Or at least they try to. Very common.
Graduate students, young adults finish school & are unsure what to do next...so they join the Peace Corps. It gives them "experience" & the feeling of doing something good for the world. Many fall in love with living & working overseas & the whole exotic experience. So after Peace Corp, what do you do???....many try for USAID or FAS jobs. They have probably even made friends with people in those organizations while in the PC.
There is a whole social world of all the Americans living/working in these foreign countries. The "worse" the country...the closer knit is the American (or western) community. Same schools, same bars, same parties. Lots of NGOs are part of this too.
Posted by: Janet | November 15, 2012 at 08:51 AM
Just so, Janet. Similar to DoD and defense contractors, there is also a movement after govt service (AID. Peace Corps,etc) to the NGOs either as a senior manager/Director or to the Board of Directors...
Posted by: Sandy Daze | November 15, 2012 at 09:40 AM
I'm trying to imagine if Top and Narciso had a child. Can you imagine the memory level that would produce?
Hey Topper! Wish you posted more often. Between you and Narciso I don't need google.
Love ya' girlie.
Posted by: Sue | November 15, 2012 at 09:58 AM