Christmas is bearing down on us like an out-of-control sleigh. Matt Drudge is headlining the news that the Obamas have decorated the White House with a mere 54 Christmas trees. One for each state?
« Sunday Morning | Main | Consequence-Free Tax Hikes »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b2aa69e2017ee5df85bd970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Holidays Are Upon Us:
The comments to this entry are closed.
I wonder where the Obamas put the other three trees?
Posted by: Kurt | December 03, 2012 at 12:46 PM
They're missing three, obviously.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | December 03, 2012 at 12:46 PM
They're missing three, obviously.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | December 03, 2012 at 12:48 PM
--the Obamas have decorated the White House with a mere 54 Christmas trees.--
That seems entirely appropriate for a man who fancies himself Santa Claus.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | December 03, 2012 at 12:49 PM
Obama and math...n'er the twain shall meet.
Posted by: maryrose | December 03, 2012 at 12:49 PM
Professional looking double post, I must congratulate my other self on thinking exactly the same thing I was.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | December 03, 2012 at 12:49 PM
One for each state and one for each member of the Obama family.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | December 03, 2012 at 12:57 PM
Austerity for thee but not for me. Let me guess, $1 million per tree for the taxpayers, included 24-hour secret service protection?
Posted by: Spending cuts first!--jimmyk | December 03, 2012 at 01:02 PM
It can't be said often enough: I really do loathe Zero.
Posted by: James D. | December 03, 2012 at 01:09 PM
Good God--I just watched (DVR) last night's 60 Minutes segment on that North Korean prison. A shocking reminder of how state power runs amok.
Posted by: Danube of Thought on IPad | December 03, 2012 at 01:14 PM
It's Christmas! Time to buy that (insert name here)but for goodness' sake, don't mention the Christ part of it. Buy it because, you know, you want it.
In our family we have gone to one or two meaningful presents. Nothing fancy, but I am sick and tired of the comsumerist atheist BS and figured our family would at least make a stand.
Posted by: matt | December 03, 2012 at 01:24 PM
Boehner points out that the JEF's budget offer was basically the same as the one that got zero DEMOCRAT votes. Yet the Republicans are no doubt to blame for their intransigence.
http://freebeacon.com/an-unbalanced-approach/
Posted by: Spending cuts first!--jimmyk | December 03, 2012 at 01:27 PM
Maybe Barry's flagrant extravagance is preferable to Jimmuh's phony asceticism. The peanut farmer would have looked around for Charlie Brown's Christmas tree, no lighting please.
Posted by: Spending cuts first!--jimmyk | December 03, 2012 at 01:30 PM
Why does the JEF family need any Christmas trees since they're going to Hawaii on the 17th and won't return until after New Year?
Posted by: Captain Hate | December 03, 2012 at 01:49 PM
The Obamas don't know it, but the 54 is very significant.
Posted by: BR | December 03, 2012 at 01:50 PM
To Rhode Island JOMers: Has Linc Chafee had the "non-Christmas tree" lighting ceremony yet at the State House?
Posted by: Thomas Collins | December 03, 2012 at 01:54 PM
DAily Caller reporting that David Corn has cited the WH in iBama's "reluctance" to being forced to go over the cliff, on the tax issue alone.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | December 03, 2012 at 01:58 PM
Only Obama Resigning could get the MSM upset with him.
Personally, I like the idea.
Posted by: PDinDetroit | December 03, 2012 at 02:01 PM
Daily Caller post at Weasel Zippers.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | December 03, 2012 at 02:04 PM
WaPo confirms.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | December 03, 2012 at 02:05 PM
I wonder which one has the Mao ornament?
Posted by: rse | December 03, 2012 at 02:06 PM
With the fiscal cliff, Obama gets (i) higher tax rates, (ii) substantial cuts to the military, and (iii) domestic cuts that don't endanger the Nanny Entitlement State. I think what many GOPers are missing is that the fiscal cliff is a plus for Obama. Thus, the GOP focus should not be seeking a good faith compromise, because Obama is not acting in good faith. The sole focus of the GOP should be setting the stage for Obama to be held accountable for what happens. That is why I am disappointed that the Congressional GOPers have not embraced the notion of (i) the House sending over a bill to the Senate with current marginal tax rates, Obamacare repeal and entitlement reform, and (ii) agreeing to abstain on a Dem bill. That approach would put vulnerable Senate Dems on the hot spot. Plus, it maximizes the chance that the Dems will be held responsible for their approach to the economy.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | December 03, 2012 at 02:11 PM
DAily Caller reporting that David Corn has cited the WH in iBama's "reluctance" to being forced to go over the cliff, on the tax issue alone.
Is anybody surprised by this? The only "reluctance" is that he was expecting Boehner to cave; other than that he welcomes this.
Posted by: Captain Hate | December 03, 2012 at 02:13 PM
I added the "reluctance" is observance of severe reluctance being conveyed by WH in Mother Jones and WaPo comments.
Didn't say that I believed it.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | December 03, 2012 at 02:16 PM
Mel at 12:49 - hilarious. See, the universe has already split, your first post was in the one floating away with Obama and his kind and you're there posting so that they don't notice anything's awry. And your second post is here with us in the new magical universe!
Posted by: BR | December 03, 2012 at 02:26 PM
I didn't mean to imply that you believed it, Mel; particularly because you put quotes around it.
Posted by: Captain Hate | December 03, 2012 at 02:27 PM
Rick Santelli and the unctuous pinhead Steve Liesman.
Fortunately for Liesman they were not in the same studio.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | December 03, 2012 at 02:27 PM
Let me add that it appears the CNBC website now no longer lists lumber futures, removing the last remaining reason I had to even visit the joint.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | December 03, 2012 at 02:30 PM
Yeah, I just don't get it. The GOP should be repeating exactly one line:
Posted by: cathyf | December 03, 2012 at 02:38 PM
Robert Samuelson on the bad faith Dems.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | December 03, 2012 at 02:40 PM
Iggy:
the CNBC website now no longer lists lumber futures
The futures of 54 trees have been cut short.
Posted by: hit and run | December 03, 2012 at 02:42 PM
TC, he will also get (iv) a recession.
Posted by: Danube of Thought on IPad | December 03, 2012 at 02:43 PM
I think what many GOPers are missing is that the fiscal cliff is a plus for Obama.
It may be a plus for him, since he only thinks of himself, but it's bad for the Dems, as well as for the country, of course. I agree the GOP House should just pass a bill extending Bush tax rates, and let the Senate kill it or Barry veto it.
Posted by: Spending cuts first!--jimmyk | December 03, 2012 at 02:46 PM
Wonderful, cathyf.
Posted by: Janet | December 03, 2012 at 02:46 PM
cathyf, exactly.
Posted by: fdcol63 | December 03, 2012 at 02:53 PM
Here's my take on it--he's a chicken shit blowhard. Stand your ground Congress. Bend on principle a bit if you need to to get a pragmatic result, but do not bend on what's really important:Cuts in spending and entitlement reform.
Posted by: Clarice | December 03, 2012 at 02:54 PM
Clarice-- the House Repubs don't even have to do that at this point. Pass a bill extending the rates for everyone. Separately Pass their budget, Obamacare repeal, and tax reform. Let BarryI veto the rate extension-- everyone's tax rates go up, plus the $50,000/year muddle start paying payroll taxes again-- OUCH for them. The debt Ceiling will be hit soon enough, At that point, let BarryI come back hat in hand for more debt to keep spending $3.5+TRILLLION/year.
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 03:00 PM
Clarice-
If he blows it all off, and he's really, really good at this, who's going to enforce anything he does?
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | December 03, 2012 at 03:03 PM
PS: happy belated Birthday Clarice!
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 03:03 PM
Oh, and I think the House should send up one bill extending the Bush tax cuts for everyone, and another bill with entitlement reform, and let the Democrats stonewall them.
The spending cuts in sequestration? Go for it. So far they are the only spending cuts that the GOP has ever gotten the Democrats to vote for in many decades. I say start somewhere, and then constantly repeat that this was the best deal that the GOP could get from their weak position and if the people want different more rational spending cuts then they will have to get the Democrats that they voted for to go along with different more rational spending cuts.
Posted by: cathyf | December 03, 2012 at 03:09 PM
Instead the American people voted for these senate Democrats and the Democrat president who passed this legislation and who want this legislation.
They also voted for a Republican-controlled House. The media will successfully blame the Republicans for failing to "compromise." The House should pass a tax and spending bill that it deems appropriate, preferably one preserving the current rates and cutting spending, and at least force the Senate to act. Boehner should also emphasize that the Republicans wanted to cut taxes, not just leave them the same, and wanted to cut spending further, but compromised instead.
Posted by: Spending cuts first!--jimmyk | December 03, 2012 at 03:10 PM
Thanks, NK, (Also Cathyf last night after I went to bed)
Posted by: Clarice | December 03, 2012 at 03:11 PM
Who is going to Make Dingy Harry bring anything the House passes to the floor of the Senate ?
Posted by: BB Key | December 03, 2012 at 03:11 PM
well said, cathyf!
--------------------------------------
From the thread's link.
". Many of the ornaments celebrate the Obama family dog, Bo, who seems to have become the First Family's favorite symbol of Christmas.
Who is paying for this insanity?
--------------------------------------------
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/12/03/why-is-the-obama-campaign-still-seeking-donations/
Why?
Posted by: pagar | December 03, 2012 at 03:13 PM
I think the House should send up one bill extending the Bush tax cuts for everyone, and another bill with entitlement reform, and let the Democrats stonewall them.
Can the Republicans put together an entitlement reform bill in two weeks? I think they need to just preserve the current rates plus cut spending, and say that they will consider any tax increases once satisfactory entitlement reform (preferably including Obamacare repeal) has been passed.
Posted by: Spending cuts first!--jimmyk | December 03, 2012 at 03:15 PM
"Enforce anything he does": I'm not quite sure what that means. But if it means that letting the rates rise means that BarryI has more tax money and no constraints- I don't agree with that. The Debt Limit runs out, and atthat point Bam only has about $2.8T/year of actual tax revenue to spemd ($800B less tha he is spending now). How does Bam spend the money? What's that ?-- Turbo Timmie will issue T-Bills and Ben B will buy them? That is a constitutional fight that Barry, Timmie and Ben B would lose so badly, it will make your head spin.
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 03:19 PM
The Hill
___
ouse Republican leaders have made a counteroffer to President Obama in the fiscal cliff negotiations, proposing to cut $2.2 trillion with a combination of spending cuts, entitlement reforms and $800 billion in new tax revenue.
The leaders delivered the offer to the White House on Monday with a three-page letter signed by Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), and four other senior Republicans, including Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), the party’s just-defeated vice presidential nominee.
Republican officials said the offer was based on a proposal outlined by Erskine Bowles, the former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton, in testimony last year before the congressional “supercommittee” on deficit reduction. That offer is distinct from the widely-cited Simpson-Bowles deficit plan released two years ago.
Posted by: Clarice | December 03, 2012 at 03:19 PM
cathyf:
The GOP should be repeating exactly one line
FACT CHECK: The quote in question actually consists of 19 lines. However, that is on JOM and is blockquoted. In MS Word, with 12pt Times New Roman font and one inch left and right margins, it is nine lines. However, if the page is given a landscape orientation, the font size reduced to 2pt and the margins reduced to three-quarters of an inch, the quote does fit onto one line.
Therefore we rate the statement: True
Who knew that when cathyf set out to come up with a bumper sticker, it would end up being 135 words? Unexpectedly! ;)
I keed because I love.
Posted by: hit and run | December 03, 2012 at 03:20 PM
cathyf:
Well said!
NK: Brilliant!
I am with clarice on this. Call his bluff. Remember according to Bammy,he doesn't bluff.
Posted by: maryrose | December 03, 2012 at 03:21 PM
Clarice@3:19- smart move by House Repubs. Use Clinton Chief of staff proposal-- Lefty Bam says no. Then pass the rate extension for everyone. Harry reid doesn't permit a Senate vote-- rates go up for everybody, and debt limit still runs out soon enough.
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 03:24 PM
Posted by: cathyf | December 03, 2012 at 03:25 PM
Can't wait to hear Bammy start trashing the counter-offer.
Just this morning on Squawk Box Steve McMahon{dem operator} was saying "Where's the Republican plan? Well here it is Obummer.
Posted by: maryrose | December 03, 2012 at 03:29 PM
NK-
It forces default, his ultimate goal.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | December 03, 2012 at 03:33 PM
The other thing that the House needs to focus on is making lists of the ObamaCrony programs and writing and passing bills prohibiting federal spending on those things. Then when Harry Reid doesn't even let them come to a vote, harp on them endlessly, "Harry Reid and Barack Obama needed to pay off their cronies with X, Y and Z, and that's where the money for the social security checks and military pay went."
Posted by: cathyf | December 03, 2012 at 03:35 PM
cathyf;
You are on a roll. Your ideas are great. The republicans need you as a paid consultant. Paging Eric Cantor...
Posted by: maryrose | December 03, 2012 at 03:38 PM
By the way, They are coming for your free speech. It might get in the way.
Posted by: MarkO | December 03, 2012 at 03:39 PM
Sue;
From other thread. My son loves the Dallas Cowboys. We even got him a football and a starter Cowboys jacket for Christmas one year. Everytime they win he gets all excited. Even when they beat the Browns.
Posted by: maryrose | December 03, 2012 at 03:40 PM
Who is paying for this insanity?
Now Pagar, his personal expenses last year were only $1.4 billion. (which is tax refunds for 200,200,000.people) So what on earth are you complaining about.
Posted by: Jane - Mock the media | December 03, 2012 at 03:43 PM
I have first dibs on cahtyf.
Posted by: Clarice | December 03, 2012 at 03:43 PM
I want "ObamaCrony" to enter the language just like "Obamacare"
(And I won't even complain if it's spelled Obamacrony. And have long ago given up the spelling as ObamaCare.)
Posted by: cathyf | December 03, 2012 at 03:51 PM
O fahrfegnugen;
http://patterico.com/2012/12/03/im-just-speculating-this-could-be-wingnut-violence/comment-page-1/#comment-1121359
remember that the culprit is actually that well known 'Lutheran' Aldosary, native of Iraq
Posted by: narciso | December 03, 2012 at 04:11 PM
Thus, the GOP focus should not be seeking a good faith compromise, because Obama is not acting in good faith. The whole focus of the GOP should be setting the stage for Obama to be held accountable for what happens.
Hahaha...stop it, you are killing me...seriously.
Posted by: squaredance | December 03, 2012 at 04:13 PM
We're in the hand of 'Top Men'
http://twitchy.com/2012/12/03/leadership-tweeter-in-chief-obama-to-hold-fiscal-cliff-twitter-chat-cant-even-keep-hashtag-straight/
Posted by: narciso | December 03, 2012 at 04:16 PM
"Default" on what? FY 2013 federal interest payments will total about $400B. Fed tax receipts (when we fall off the cliff) will be about $2.8T. That leave $2.4 trillion to run the fed Gov't on after interest payments (interest payments get priority, they constitutionally mandated). So what default?
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 04:18 PM
Well, NK, if the Obamacronies get paid more than $2.4 trillion, then there won't be $400B left to pay off the interest on the debt...
More seriously, interest rates are at about 1/10th the level that they were 25 years ago. If the inflation from the ObamaBucks causes interest rates to go up by a factor of 10, then that's $4 trillion in interest that we need to come up with each year.
Posted by: cathyf | December 03, 2012 at 04:29 PM
ZeroHedge claims WE HAVE ARRIVED! The Fed Gov't is at the statutory debt limit 103% of GDP-- when BarryI came in debt was 75% of GDP. NO MORE DEBT-- No increase, let the Fed Gov't get by spending $400B on interest and $2.4Trillion for everything else. That's it. http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2012/11-2/total%20debt%20to%20gdp.jpg
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 04:30 PM
An interesting insight that I gleaned from my Renaissance studies, suggests that the influence
of the Ikwan, is more important then which ever
Saudi prince rules the roost, however some of these figures, still have wider influence, here
and in neighboring countries to the kingdom, too much attention, has been put on Prince Talal, and his associate bin Mansour, where other influences have similar influences;
Posted by: narciso | December 03, 2012 at 04:33 PM
Jimmyk, in response to your question at 3:10 PM as to whether the GOP can put together an entitlement reform bill in two weeks, my guess is that they have already had their legislative drafting staffers put something together. Thus, they wouldn't be starting from scratch. If anyone more familiar with the federal legislative process thinks I am wrong, let us know.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | December 03, 2012 at 04:34 PM
Actually Cathy F-- IMO, when the inflation comes, BenB has no intention to raise rates-- he'll let the inflation run out to soak up all the Fed and housing debt by reducing the 'real' amount of the debt. Of course, gasoline will be $50/gal and a loaf of bread $25, but Ben B doesn't seem to mind that much.
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 04:36 PM
To clarify why some voted for democrats.
http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/12/why-some-people-voted-democrat/
I still can't understand why any American would vote for a Democrat.
Posted by: pagar | December 03, 2012 at 04:40 PM
Maryrose,
Everytime they win he gets all excited. Even when they beat the Browns.
What a smart son you have. ::grin::
Posted by: Sue | December 03, 2012 at 04:41 PM
And now a 23yo Brit lad is a suicide over $13,000 in debts: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2242259/Student-Toby-Thorn-killed-just-8-000-debt-wrote-suicide-note-BANK-letter.html
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 04:42 PM
This references comes from a Shoebat piece, referring an event back in 2009;
His Royal Highness Prince Mamdouh bin Abdul Aziz accompanied the family of U.S. President Barack Obama in his palace in Jeddah after the performance of the Hajj this year. The event was attended by His Royal Highness Prince Faisal bin Thamer bin Abdul Aziz, and His Royal Highness Prince Abdul Aziz Bin Mamdouh Bin Abdul Aziz, and his HRH Prince Abdullah bin Nayef bin Abdul Aziz, and a number of other princes and officials.
the apocryphal comments of one Saudi official,
in Lacey's Inside the Kingdom, re the hopes for Obama circa the inagguration, before he
refused,
Posted by: narciso | December 03, 2012 at 04:43 PM
Chad Pergram @ChadPergram
White House basically rejects House GOP offer out of hand on the #fiscalcliff
Posted by: centralcal | December 03, 2012 at 04:55 PM
Over the Cliff-- No new debt.....
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 05:02 PM
... Pass a tax rate extension bill NOW, re-pass the budget... after the 1st of the year, pass tax reform... then wait for BarryI to come back asking for more debt... make him ask pretty please.
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 05:04 PM
I provided a little context to this report, which otherwise reads as press release;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/post/justice-department-chief-of-staff-grindler-is-leaving/2012/12/03/f90a7dca-3d79-11e2-ae43-cf491b837f7b_blog.html?wprss=rss_in-the-loop
Posted by: narciso | December 03, 2012 at 05:17 PM
They didn't ask him, 'what kind of a tree, would he be;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/post/gitmo-detainees-deep-thoughts-on-dogs-basketball/2012/12/03/e3349bea-3d72-11e2-a2d9-822f58ac9fd5_blog.html
Posted by: narciso | December 03, 2012 at 05:24 PM
The problem with the inflation rate is that it is being hidden by the economy being in the toilet. If the economy comes out of the toilet (which is necessary to bring in any more tax revenue) then the already-printed Bernanke-Bucks are going to blow up the interest payments. The only way to get ahead of that game is hyper-inflation.
Note that's the BernankeBucks that have already been printed.
Posted by: cathyf | December 03, 2012 at 05:25 PM
Any news on Benghazi or Fast and Furious??
This debt cliff shit isn't cutting it for me folks. Obama is a clown. It's obvious.
Posted by: Gus | December 03, 2012 at 05:32 PM
More and more I feel like that scene in The Hunt For Red October where Capt Tupolev fixes the Konovalov's torpedo so that it can't be called off, and then the Red October maneuvers so that this torpedo is locked on to the Konovalov. And in the split second that they all realize that they are doomed, the first officer turns to Tupolev and says, You arrogant ass. You've killed us.
Posted by: cathyf | December 03, 2012 at 05:34 PM
CathyF asks: "But the duration of the government's debt is very short. As low-interest bonds mature, who will buy the new bonds if the interest rates won't come close to covering expected inflation?" Very true-- but if the bonds are being replaced with dollar denominated bonds that have a 'real' value of say 33% less because of the debased currency, the higher %rate demanded by the bond buyers is 'affordable'. Of course this sort of inflation and currency debasement kills consumers who see their commodity buying power slashed-- but BenB seems to have a lot of tolerance for that.
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 05:38 PM
I have a patent on that line, Cathy,
You could just turn to the LOC report around pg 40, General and one gets a more substantial briefing
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-12-03/terror-groups-in-africa-work-with-al-qaeda-general-says
Posted by: narciso | December 03, 2012 at 05:38 PM
PS-- US Bonds already are paying negative real interest rates.
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 05:40 PM
But if the economy is still in the toilet, the tax revenues aren't going up, and if the interest rate demanded is 35% rather than 1/2 of 1%, then that $400 billion in interest payments goes up to $2.8 trillion -- consuming every penny of tax receipts.
Posted by: cathyf | December 03, 2012 at 05:42 PM
Any news on Benghazi or Fast and Furious??
Or where the Pigford money went? Or who set Sarah Palin's church on fire? How bout Fannie & Freddie?...& the housing loan debacle? Anyone have to pay for that? Where's Corzine? Where's John F'n Kerry's boat docked now?
So many questions....no answers. We're movin' FORWARD...or FOWARD...or FORWARD!
Posted by: Janet | December 03, 2012 at 05:47 PM
Right now we are already at a point where our very low inflation is the average of everything-we-buy-going-up-in-price and everything-we-own-going-down-in-value.
I was there when Reagan held firm and wrung out the Nixon-Ford-Carter stagflation. It hurt very badly, and looked to me about what the polity would tolerate. It looks to my like the necessary pain now is several orders of magnitude larger, and the population's tolerance several orders of magnitude smaller.
When push comes to shove, these assholes who voted for Obama will sell out all of our freedoms for a crust of bread.
...and they won't even get their crusts...
Posted by: cathyf | December 03, 2012 at 05:48 PM
Of course, this piece at least examines, the reason why Grindler, is leaving;
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/03/holder-chief-staff-to-leave-post/
Posted by: narciso | December 03, 2012 at 05:49 PM
CathyF-- i'm the last person to ask to defend BenB's insane Debt binge, -- because it's insane-- but as of today Spain 10year Bonds trade at 5.25%-- 3 times the rate of US Bonds, but not 35%-- or anything like that. The US super inflation will come, but if there is US growth, bond buyers may very well buy at <5%. I wouldn't bet on it, but I'm not the Fed Chairman.
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 05:50 PM
I guess I'll just sit and laugh as nothing is done about entitlement reform. After all, I'll be among those hurt most by it. I'd like to see it done because it's in the country's best interest, but as long as they insist on giving me stuff I don't really need, who am I to complain?
Living well is the best revenge.
Posted by: Danube of Thought on IPad | December 03, 2012 at 05:53 PM
A comparison between the wh proposal and the House rep proposal..http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/republicans-make-their-fiscal-cliff-counteroffer/2012/12/03/16f1b75e-3d8e-11e2-8a5c-473797be602c_blog.html
Posted by: Clarice | December 03, 2012 at 05:55 PM
I'm sure the Chinless one, is taking it under advisement,
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/03/syria-moves-chemical-weapons-white-house-warns-crossing-red-line/
Posted by: narciso | December 03, 2012 at 05:58 PM
Unexpected:
"Stocks are closed lower on Wall Street after a surprisingly weak manufacturing report heightened concern that fiscal deadlock in Washington is already hurting the economy." (AP)
Posted by: Danube of Thought on IPad | December 03, 2012 at 06:01 PM
And in the great tradition of promoting Bacchus and Camp, to leadership;
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2965266/posts
Posted by: narciso | December 03, 2012 at 06:04 PM
NEWSER) – With fiscal cliff negotiations going, in John Boehner's words, "nowhere," Republicans are considering what ABC News correspondent Jon Karl calls a "doomsday" contingency plan. Under the plan—which Karl's sources say "is becoming the most likely scenario"—the House would approve extending the middle class Bush tax cuts, but would agree to absolutely nothing else before the holiday recess, leaving President Obama to face massive spending cuts and another debt ceiling showdown as soon as Congress returned.
In other fiscal cliff news:
Nancy Pelosi is threatening to use a maneuver called the "discharge petition" to bring the Senate's already-passed bill averting the cliff to the House floor whether Boehner likes it or not, CNN reports. Pelosi would then need to woo a handful of Republicans to her side to actually pass the bill.
Posted by: Clarice | December 03, 2012 at 06:05 PM
WWhoopee my new Williams sonoma catalogue arrived--should I buy the pot for fermenting my own sauerkraut? It's just under $80 plus S & H?
Hmm
Tough decision.
Posted by: Clarice | December 03, 2012 at 06:14 PM
ABC's Jon Karl stumbles upon the reality. NO MORE MONEY!! NO MORE DEBT!!! pay as you go. In the UK, the BoE tries something novel-- the bosses tell the truth. Our grandkids will be paying off this this debt, and have dramatically reduced living standards. Do you think those bastards BarryI, Geithner, Reid and Pelosi dare tell that truth about the debt they created: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2242421/Andrew-Haldane-Bank-bosss-view-financial-crisis-left-debt-paid-grandchildren.html
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 06:17 PM
I definitely steer clear of sentences with the words "Pelosi" and "discharge".
Posted by: Captain Hate | December 03, 2012 at 06:18 PM
CaptH@618-- heh!
Posted by: NK | December 03, 2012 at 06:18 PM
We could have a JOM fermented cabbage stamping if I can get a big enough crock for it.
Posted by: Clarice | December 03, 2012 at 06:20 PM