[BUMPED 5-22: Let's go another week!]
I surrender. Let's have a Brady thread.
RESOLVED: Tom Brady is innocent of all wrong-doing and will be fully exonerated on appeal.
Away we go!
Balls to the wall.
There is only one rule in this argument: the last comment on the subject wins.
Great balls of fire!
Posted by: Frau Schimpfwort | May 15, 2015 at 10:39 PM
I lied: there are two rules to this argument - the second rule is this: This will be the only thread on which Brady arguments are welcome.
New threads after this one should be Brady-free.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 15, 2015 at 10:39 PM
So did Mitt win?
Posted by: Jane on Ipad | May 15, 2015 at 10:42 PM
Well I,m not su.re about brady, but I trust Goodell right up there with 'Dr evil' see my dilemma
Posted by: narciso | May 15, 2015 at 10:43 PM
Welcome Clarice's invited guests. I hope they are really angry. And I hope they remain here and are not interested in following the Brady bouncing balls.
Posted by: Frau Schimpfwort | May 15, 2015 at 10:50 PM
It appears to me that, at JOM anyway, repetitive, OCD type controversies abhor a vacuum and if one is extinguished another rises to take its place.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkywatzky | May 15, 2015 at 10:52 PM
Other Brady-related rules.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 15, 2015 at 10:52 PM
New threads after this one should be Brady-free.
I won't be the first to break this rule.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | May 15, 2015 at 10:53 PM
--So did Mitt win?--
The black dude knocked him out three and a half years ago.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkywatzky | May 15, 2015 at 10:55 PM
I'm out.
Posted by: lyle | May 15, 2015 at 10:55 PM
Much like Cadmus teeth from the myth. Fr the last thread there was a week old interview of morell, in USA today, that removes all doubt
Posted by: narciso | May 15, 2015 at 10:55 PM
Brutal week for DC sports as the Hawks move on to face the Cavs in the Eastern Conference finals. Nene is not the most popular person in DC right now.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 15, 2015 at 10:56 PM
"New threads after this one should be Brady-free."
Does that mean we can't say "I told you so" when a judge or arbitrator says the NFL's suspension of Brady was unfounded? ;-)
Bytol.
Posted by: boatbuilder | May 15, 2015 at 10:57 PM
Then there was that foreign policy of the latest mad imam that doha has given sanctuary.
Posted by: narciso | May 15, 2015 at 10:58 PM
Who is Brady? What office is he running for?
Posted by: Theo | May 15, 2015 at 11:04 PM
TTFN...
Posted by: Frau Schimpfwort | May 15, 2015 at 11:10 PM
Rules???
http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/05/investigative-journalist-airport-photo.html
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 15, 2015 at 11:12 PM
Who is this Tom Brady . . .
and why is he single-handedly trying to ruin the NFL ?
Posted by: Michael (fpa Patriot4Freedom) | May 15, 2015 at 11:13 PM
Ss ho happens to be chaplain for the kingdom's west point, and has lectured the interior ministry's office that guards the oil fields
Posted by: narciso | May 15, 2015 at 11:16 PM
Brilliant posts, JD. Transitional.
Posted by: caro | May 15, 2015 at 11:19 PM
Patterico reports the same issue going on at his site as was reported here earlier today.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 15, 2015 at 11:22 PM
Nytol. Behave.
Posted by: clarice | May 15, 2015 at 11:33 PM
Apologies Mr. formerly hit Dobbs,
I didn't realize your new thread was a Deflate Zone, out of respect for all those sick of this subject I was trying to keep my comments on the subject on old threads where only those interested were interacting.
Posted by: Some Guy | May 15, 2015 at 11:39 PM
Some Guy, Mr Dobbs has made it a point of JOM style that apologies are to be avoided.
Posted by: jimmyk on iPhone | May 15, 2015 at 11:48 PM
And I make no apologies because I have made all of about three comments in total on l'affaire Brady, and would prefer the whole topic to go away.
Posted by: jimmyk on iPhone | May 15, 2015 at 11:51 PM
Who was cousin Oliver?
Posted by: jorod | May 15, 2015 at 11:58 PM
"Ted Wells has come under fire in the wake of his “Deflategate” report. We all know about the punishments that have been handed down by now. Everyone has heard about the fine, the suspension, and the forfeiture of draft picks. There is no need to rehash. The country has spoken, and most NFL fans agree with the penalties, with the exception noted by the legions of Patriots fans.
After Tom Brady’s agent took the offensive, calling the report and Ted Wells out publicly, the Patriots responded. To their credit, they have attempted to back up their media blast of the Deflategate findings, publishing more than 20,000 words of their own. It goes into their experts scientific conclusions, different interpretations of the text messages, and boldly proclaims the Patriots innocence.
Many points noted here in the report are debatable. Whether you want to believe the assertions made by the Patriots legal team or not is up to you. But, they do poke holes, at least from their perspective, in Ted Wells’ report.
But, there is one glaring error that belies their case 100%. Even if you grant the holes in the report that the Patriots assert, there is one point in all of this that the report never disputes.
Take a look at a product of the “Deflategate” situation that seems to go forgotten (Pro Football Talk):
Look at the passage once more time. “…the Patriots admitted”. The Patriots handed down the punishments on the two major players in the scandal.
Why would the Patriots punish the two employees, if the team was “innocent”? For those of you reading this that manage people, would you suspend an employee for doing nothing wrong? I would think not.
The report never addresses that point. It makes a lot of references to the fact that there is no evidence that they deflated the footballs. Then tell us this, why did you suspend the employees?
The reason is that they are guilty, and everybody knows it. “Deflategate” came out with the correct result, no matter how loudly the Patriots proclaim their innocence."
http://www.endzonescore.com/new-england-patriots-deflategate-rebuttal-misses-one-major-point/15126
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 16, 2015 at 12:29 AM
Jeff, saw this at Patterico ...
Posted by: boris | May 16, 2015 at 12:44 AM
--The reason is that they are guilty, and everybody knows it.--
Patriots defenders remind me of the OJ jury.
I see Brady painfully struggling to hold a football, his fingers curled up like Fred Sanford's, and it slipping out of his hand. If he lost his grip you must acquit. Giselle I'm comin to join ya honey.
In the meantime Tommy Boy is going to leave no stone unturned until he finds the real deflators.
Feh.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkywatzky | May 16, 2015 at 12:49 AM
TK,
That's been the big talking point on ESPN. However, the news of the suspensions of the two employees didn't come from the Patriots, it was from an announcement from the NFL.
The "the Patriots admitted" isn't a quote at all from either the NFL or New England, it's the author's paraphrase at ProFootball Talk.
Here is the exact quote from the NFL:
"Patriots owner Robert Kraft advised Commissioner Roger Goodell last week that Patriots employees John Jastremski and James McNally have been indefinitely suspended without pay by the club, effective on May 6th. Neither of these individuals may be reinstated without the prior approval of NFL Executive Vice President of Football Operations Troy Vincent."
Given how much false information has already been leaked and or announced by the NFL, and that the Wells Report has been in the NFL's possession for quite awhile before it become public, do we know if the Patriots "fired" these guys, or did the NFL tell Kraft to suspend them?
Posted by: Some Guy | May 16, 2015 at 01:02 AM
"Patriots defenders remind me of the OJ jury."
I'd say there was better evidence against OJ.
OTOH the evidence here reminds me of the Libby trial. Maybe some people who "just know that SOB is guilty" are like the Libby jury.
I watched a couple of Packer games and rooted against the Pats in the superbowl. On this I'm just skeptical. ManTran made a great point last thread,
"a handful of crap gauges worth, what ten bucks, and incompetently used, affect tens of millions of bucks is nuts"
Posted by: boris | May 16, 2015 at 01:08 AM
If there is nothing in print from the NFL stating that the NFL strongarmed Kraft, the evidence you produced makes it clear that Kraft suspended his would be innocent employees.
Correct?
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 16, 2015 at 01:16 AM
Exactly boris. My sole interest in this is exactly like it was Libby, Zimmerman, Gentle Giant, etc. -- a dominate narrative and rush to judgement that simply wasn't/isn't supported by the FACTS.
Posted by: Some Guy | May 16, 2015 at 01:19 AM
No TK, it is only clear that the NFL announced that Kraft had suspended the employees. It isn't yet clear if Kraft did this on his own, or if the NFL ordered him too.
Posted by: Some Guy | May 16, 2015 at 01:25 AM
Is it clear that Kraft didn't discuss how he came to suspending the Deflator in his rebuttal?
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 16, 2015 at 01:29 AM
TK, not going down the rabbit hole with you on this. The rebuttal was specific to the Wells Report and you know it.
If you believe the NFL announcement means that Kraft did this on his own. Good for you. Go with that, and God speed.
I believe the NFL announcement is likely 'krafted' to their advantage.
We'll just disagree on how important this is or what it proves.
Posted by: Some Guy | May 16, 2015 at 01:37 AM
The NFL can't be trusted with anything.
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 16, 2015 at 01:43 AM
Well, you did say that you hate the NFL, so not sure why you would put any trust in them.
Posted by: Some Guy | May 16, 2015 at 01:47 AM
Not sure why the Pat's would either.
Money?
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 16, 2015 at 01:49 AM
Goodnight, SG.
Hopefully Kraft will clear this up.
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 16, 2015 at 01:52 AM
Captain Renault, is shocked! Shocked that money and the NFL are mentioned!
Posted by: Some Guy | May 16, 2015 at 01:54 AM
Were they playing with illegal footballs or not
Posted by: maryrose | May 16, 2015 at 01:56 AM
Night TK, and everyone. Happy Sunday.
Posted by: Some Guy | May 16, 2015 at 01:56 AM
Well this blows@#$!
I go away from this place for one day and what the hell happens?
Here I was all set to set up a skins and shirts Rugby scrimmage between the JOMer's with nicknames and the JOMer's with real names, and here Hit runs off and defects to the enemy:(
Hit"Jeff" could'a been on the team with Captain Hate, Miss Marple, Narciso, Frau, Ignatz, Anonamom, DrJ, Porchlight, Beasts, CentralCal, Manny T, Old Lurker's, New Lurkers, Young Lurkers, Threadkiller, Soylent, BoatBuilder, Sandy Daze and Some Guy, but no, here he is instead sliding over to hang with Clarice, Cecil, Jane, Tom Collins, Maryrose, Janet, Matt, JImmyK, Dave in Ma, Stephanie, Henry, Sue, GUS, Marlene, JamesD, NK, Peter, Jim Miller, and Boris.Now I gotta' rearrange the whole damn line-up, and I still can't figure out where the heck to put JiB and Caro. @#$%.
If it ain't one thing around this place, Mister Dobbs, it's another:(
(So wha'do'ya guys think? Is Caro skins or should she wear a shirt?)
Posted by: daddy | May 16, 2015 at 03:34 AM
Ext-
How'd you know I was illegally photographing sunsets? :-)
Referring to the previous thread and so late in catching up.
Posted by: glasater | May 16, 2015 at 03:37 AM
Daddy, you forgot Extraneus and me in your lineup(s) ; )
Posted by: glasater | May 16, 2015 at 03:48 AM
I know Glas, I found Daddy's post quite daring because there is no way he could remember everyone.
Posted by: Jane | May 16, 2015 at 05:53 AM
Good news! Spring has finally arrived in the Maine woods. The bad news is, pollen. I'm losing my voice,so hubby is happy. :)
Posted by: Marlene on the phone | May 16, 2015 at 05:59 AM
Wasn't he the Koch brothers of the Clinton years?
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/05/clinton-foundation-donors-include-dozens-of-media-207228.html
Posted by: Extraneus | May 16, 2015 at 06:15 AM
Brutal week for DC sports as the Hawks move on to face the Cavs in the Eastern Conference finals. Nene is not the most popular person in DC right now.
That was a tough loss, but it's not nearly as soul-killing as the Capitals loss was.
If nothing else, I don't think anyone had much hope of the Wizards being remotely competitive if they did manage to advance to face the LeBrons, let alone whoever comes out of the Western Conference.
Posted by: James D. | May 16, 2015 at 06:46 AM
Good morning!
Anyone tired of the Deflategate controversy can amuse themselves speculating on this fight:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/05/we-gonna-just-you-up-black-ferguson-activists-threaten-white-liberals-for-protest-pay/
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 16, 2015 at 07:21 AM
MissM, the plantation dwellers are figuring out how limousine liberals get their limousines? When do they apply this clue to Jesse and Sharpton?
Posted by: henry | May 16, 2015 at 07:30 AM
henry,
Here is a lesson for them in self-sufficiency. They should never have trusted those hipster weasels with the cash,and should have done it themselves.
Of course, this would have required understanding how to set up a donation web site, so maybe some of them will take basic computer courses or something.
Why they trusted that group I do not know. One would think that the lessons of championship boxers and ball players bankrupted by unscrupulous agents and managers would be well known, but apparently not.
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 16, 2015 at 07:39 AM
Other Brady-related rules.
Posted by: Dave (in MA)
10:52
Heh, Dave. Obviously Brady's concerns in that video relate to tactile issues rather than inflation pressures.
Posted by: boatbuilder | May 16, 2015 at 08:02 AM
Clintons report making $25M for speeches since Jan. '14
Posted by: Extraneus | May 16, 2015 at 08:02 AM
The OFA slaves should have had someone read them the enlistment contract when they made their mark to join the Free Shit Army. Just wait 'til they get the Loot Tax notice from OFA.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 16, 2015 at 08:04 AM
I do believe stolen money is taxable income, Rick. (ask Al Capone). Surely the 1099's are in the mail?
Posted by: Old Lurker | May 16, 2015 at 08:07 AM
I think the Ferguson rioters have a point..they were used to raise money for those hipster weasels.
Posted by: clarice | May 16, 2015 at 08:10 AM
Ah, I see rick beat me to it in far more colorful language as usual.
Posted by: clarice | May 16, 2015 at 08:11 AM
clarice,
I think they have a point, too.
Publicity of the hipster weasel group's perfidy in this should be helpful.
What does this remind me of? The Clinton Foundation making money off the disaster victims in Haiti.
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 16, 2015 at 08:18 AM
For henry, NK, JiB, or other soccer fans . . .
In Premier League action, a Southampton striker (Mane - from Senegal) just scored a hat trick in only 2:56 against Aston Villa.
Wow ! Said to be an all-time EPL record.
Game's being broadcast stateside on NBC Sports Network.
Posted by: Michael (fpa Patriot4Freedom) | May 16, 2015 at 08:26 AM
The democrats have a long history of using blacks but not cutting them in on the loot.
It goes all the way back to them diverting money from the New York governor's race to try to defeat Jeb Bush, stiffing David Paterson. They also refused letting the Mayor of Atlanta Maynard Jackson run for head of the DNC, chose decrepit Mondale to run for Senate over a black Supreme Court justice Alan Page, and squashed Harold Ford Jr. when he wanted to challenge Pelosi.
It's very instructive when you link all of those events together.
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 16, 2015 at 08:28 AM
Thanks Michael!
Elsewhere, wag the dog. U.S. On the ground in Syria. I suppose Tstephanopoulis was getting too much attention.
Posted by: henry | May 16, 2015 at 08:29 AM
It's actually the perpetual Clinton Campaign using tax deductible donations to the Foundation to finance itself. If the investigative press were not extinct, they would be trumpeting the names of Clinton campaign workers and vendors sustained by employment by the Foundation rather than paying access fees to it.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 16, 2015 at 08:30 AM
RB
So true about the Clintons
MM Very good historical review of past offenses of the Dem crew
Posted by: maryrose | May 16, 2015 at 08:47 AM
What could go wrong?
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/15/opinion/let-syrians-settle-detroit.html
(h/t Tim Blair)
Posted by: jimmyk | May 16, 2015 at 08:48 AM
FTSAH: boatbuilder is winning the argument.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 16, 2015 at 08:51 AM
The JV team needs a new captain.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 16, 2015 at 08:51 AM
I don't know if it is online yet, but there is an excellent editorial in today's (actually Monday's) IBD: "A Word of Appreciation For All Obama Has Done"
Posted by: Peter | May 16, 2015 at 08:54 AM
Jeff, that doesn't change the immutable law of football: the Patriots shall be jerks.
Posted by: henry | May 16, 2015 at 08:59 AM
Oh, and Romney quit after two rounds against Holyfield. Threw in the towel.
At least that's better than against Obama where he threw in the towel after the first debate.
(i really didn't want to use a zing to write about the fight - it was a great event for a great cause and Romney was just a great great sport about it. but it was just sitting there begging to be said, and i have impulse control problems.)
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 16, 2015 at 09:03 AM
At this point Brady has a four game suspension, the Pats have a million dollar fine, the two key implicated employees have been jacked by Kraft, and boatbuilder is winning the argument.
I tend to agree, because an illegal alien is president and I have been winning the argument that he isn't really POTUS.
My guess is that NFL millionaire club issue gets adjudicated first.
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 16, 2015 at 09:04 AM
JUDITH MILLER AND JAMES O'KEEFE DISCUSS ETHICS IN JOURNALISM.
No joke. See the video. Investigatve journalism is alive and well.
Posted by: Ben | May 16, 2015 at 09:10 AM
'HEH' I should add.
Posted by: Ben | May 16, 2015 at 09:11 AM
"I should add"
As in negative plus negative is positive? Heh!
Posted by: boris | May 16, 2015 at 09:25 AM
Jeff,
I vote for ManTran having won the argument with his comment on the last thread. I'll take his expert opinion in support of boatbuilder's and Some Guy's observations regarding the absence of actual facts as dispositive and pronounce myself ready to MoveOn.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 16, 2015 at 09:26 AM
Just a quick reminder, the argument - as it exists on this thread - is being governed by a single rule as explained in the post.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 16, 2015 at 09:29 AM
Speaking of the Free Shit Army, the results of the special election for the local extended day care and indoctrination centers were barely in when the chief babysitter announced that the will of the voters be damned, they'd be back in November to do it all over again. With such a finely honed respect for the will of the governed and inability to adjust to situations, is it any wonder that the end product is so substandard?
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 16, 2015 at 09:33 AM
Jeff--I'll make sure you get some kicks and have a big autograph day. Size 10 or 11?
Posted by: boatbuilder | May 16, 2015 at 09:33 AM
Well it seems I am winning the argument on the Brady topic.
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 16, 2015 at 09:36 AM
Not anymore!
Posted by: boatbuilder | May 16, 2015 at 09:39 AM
Some Guy, shortly after the penalties were announced, I read an assertion that the Pats took the initiative to suspend Jastremski and McNally. There was no backup for the assertion, and I have seen nothing since then.
By the way, on the noncooperation angle: A day or so after the controversy began, ESPN published a now thoroughly discredited article claiming that Brady's balls were in the realm of 20 percent deflated. Was that a lie leaked from the NFL? If not, why didn't the NFL, which had access to the actual data, correct ESPN? Is Goodell going to make his cellphone, and the cellphone of other NFL personnel, available to resolve this? I know, rhetorical question.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | May 16, 2015 at 09:40 AM
Top ISIS commander killed in Syria on President Obama's orders.
Meanwhile on the campaign trail....Jeb Bush still debating whether or not he's a fan of the worst foreign policy disaster in U.S history.
Republicans have long since held that President George W.Bush was one of the greatest Conservative intellectuals of his time,so it's hard for Jeb to live up to his brother mental prowess.
Posted by: Dublindave | May 16, 2015 at 09:44 AM
TC,
When Brady uttered "Will no one relieve the pressure on my balls?", the die was cast and his guilt established.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 16, 2015 at 09:47 AM
TC--since speculation is the rule of the day, I am fairly confident that there are all sorts of texts among the NFL guys along the lines of "We finally got the bastards!"
The reality, using the Wells report assumptions, is that the amount of alleged deflation at issue is precisely the amount of the difference in the calibration of the two gauges.
It's also a very, very small amount--the amount of the variance in measurements of the same balls using the same gauges, in fact.
If you use common sense (and take Anderson at his word) there is no mystery here.
Someguy is actually winning arguments. I am persistent but I don't stand a chance against TK using Jeff's rule.
Posted by: boatbuilder | May 16, 2015 at 09:53 AM
Rick, that put a smile on my face. By the way, I think you have in a pithy manner described Brady's role in this. Brady, I suspect, never said deflate below 12.5. But he kept complaining. I think the texts support the view that Brady put relentless pressure on Jastremski and McNally. Brady does interviews every week on sports talk radio. It's interesting how he keeps trying to control, most of the time successfully, his in your face under the surface fury. I suspect the fury comes out on the underlings. Now, Brady is certainly not the first top banana to be an a-hole. But I think that's an aspect of Law and Order-Special PSI Unit that has been underemphasized.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | May 16, 2015 at 09:57 AM
A cogent remark on the Clinton income, broken down in numbers the math-challenged can understand:
yourchampion @JCBarraza2 5m5 minutes ago
@EdMorrissey worth spreading - $25 million from 1/1/14 to 4/30/15 comes out to $51,000 a day - abt what avg family makes a year.
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 16, 2015 at 10:01 AM
Boatbuilder, even if a factfinder concluded that it was not more probable than not that the balls were below 12.5, an appellate court would, I don't think, given the deference appellate courts give to lower court findings of fact, overturn a finding that McNally tampered with the balls at Brady's behest. Thus, an appellate court would uphold a suspension for Brady. An appellate court would also, under the facts we know, uphold at least a one year without pay suspension fir Goodell.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | May 16, 2015 at 10:04 AM
Daddy, you forgot Extraneus and me in your lineup(s) ; )
Posted by: glasater
Glas,
I was holding you and Ext and Appalled and Michael(Pat-4), and many others of course, for the skins-shirts Beach Volleyball roster on St Jane's island. I had no idea you was a Rugby fanatic:)
Posted by: daddy | May 16, 2015 at 10:05 AM
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2015/05/16/smartest-guy-ever-to-become-president-blows-it-again/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 16, 2015 at 10:06 AM
Spell me some speculation.
Is it true that the Pat's, in protest to the Wells Report, suggested that they had knowledge that the Jaguar's had seen the Colt's ballboys hidding deflation needles up their sleeves?
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 16, 2015 at 10:06 AM
I appreciate the vote of confidence, boatbuilder.
I predict the win will go to cathyf though.
She possesses a unique set of skills as to the timing of a thread ending.
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 16, 2015 at 10:10 AM
TC,
All that remains is to correctly place Brady on a spectrum between Alcibiades entering seven teams in the Olympics to assure his possession of the laurels and Gaylord Perry's slippery entrance into the Hall of Fame.
The circenses never change.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 16, 2015 at 10:10 AM
This is a great commercial. It tells me a couple of things:
1. There is a deep memory of the Soviets and freedom is still a good theme in advertising.
2. Sell McDonald's stock.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuap4wIGSLg
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 16, 2015 at 10:16 AM
When Brady uttered "Will no one relieve the pressure on my balls?", the die was cast and his guilt established.
RickB,
For some reason when I read that, Charles Colson's famous sign behind his desk in the WH came to mind: "When you have them by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow".
Posted by: Jack is Lightnings! | May 16, 2015 at 10:22 AM
TK:
I predict the win will go to cathyf though.
But . . . it has to be on the subject to qualify under the rules.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 16, 2015 at 10:23 AM
" But he kept complaining. I think the texts support the view that Brady put relentless pressure on Jastremski and McNally"
As supported by the absence of a single text before or after October referring in any way to any concerns about any such "relentless pressure?"
Posted by: boatbuilder | May 16, 2015 at 10:25 AM
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/bill-and-hillary-clinton-made-roughly-25-million-in-speeches-since-2014-118009.html
Includes full list of appearances and fees for both Bill and Hillary and groups they spoke to.
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 16, 2015 at 10:29 AM
TC--What "lower court findings of fact" are you talking about?
All that has happened so far is that the "investigator" hired by the "employer" issued a report on which the employer based the suspension of the employee.
Posted by: boatbuilder | May 16, 2015 at 10:29 AM
I understand that, Jeff.
She is a clever gal.
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 16, 2015 at 10:31 AM