James Taranto notes that Kerry's support is slipping in the black community, and uses this to explain Kerry's recent mention of Mary Cheney:
Note that the explanation for the shift centers on older black voters and Christian conservatives. Is anyone still obtuse enough to believe it's mere coincidence that Kedwards have been shouting from the rooftops that Dick Cheney has a homosexual in the family?
The Baseball Crank has more evidence on this point, and here is some reaction from the black clergy during the discussion in Massachusetts last winter.
That said, my take is that people are thinking too hard, and overlooking the obvious reason that the two Johns keep mentioning Mary - when they think of hot "girl on girl" action, they think of Republicans. And why not? Tall John has probably been hearing from Teresa for years what we just learned this week - Republicans have better sex.
Channelling Wonkette, are we?
Posted by: Crank | October 20, 2004 at 08:20 PM
Regarding the sex-satisfaction survey, I’m waiting for this response from the left-wing:
As for talking up Cheney’s daughter, sure they want to raise questions in the minds of conservative Christians, regardless of color. It may prove to be foolish if Republicans can point out that while both candidates profess to be foes of gay marriage, those in favor of it back, er, are behind, er, support Kerry.Posted by: The Kid | October 20, 2004 at 10:17 PM
The Curse of the A-Rod has infected Just One Minute--Mariner fans gloat.
And, didn't Jesse Jackson recently deride gay marriage in a campaign appearance with Kerry at a Black church?
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | October 21, 2004 at 10:11 AM
Channelling Wonkette? I would say, "Move over, Wonkette", but how would people take it?
Posted by: TM | October 21, 2004 at 02:30 PM
well, like the poll said: more men are republicans, so of course they're more satisfied with their sex lives. more women are democrats, and they're less satisified. it's more about a split between the satisfaction of men and women than the politics of the people involved. and men think they're god's gift to sex, when women really know it's just better to fake an orgasm than tell your partner that he has no clue as to what he's doing.
Posted by: catherine | October 21, 2004 at 02:52 PM
Darn, so much for my theory that Dems can't enjoy sex because when they light up a cigarette afterwards they are reminded of Al Gore and his dying sister.
Posted by: TM | October 21, 2004 at 03:35 PM
Thankyou Catherine, for that superb demonstration of feminine (feminist?) 'logic'!
Posted by: Skip Kent | October 21, 2004 at 03:50 PM
hey, i'm always happy to point out men's failings!
Posted by: catherine | October 21, 2004 at 03:56 PM
We republicans do enjoy better sex. It has to do with taking responsibility for your own happiness and not waiting on the gummint for a hand!
Posted by: Abu Qa'Qa | October 21, 2004 at 04:24 PM
Since more Republicans are married, and most married couples, in order to stay married, must actually communicate with their partners, it's no small wonder that there is better sex.
Additionally, Republican guys "understand the market"- if they satisfy a woman/customer, they'll always come back for more. Don't satisfy her, and they keep shopping.
I think that Catherine's dating the wrong guys, or has scared away those sensitive enough to see to her satisfaction before theirs. And the guys who understand the market? They know that sometimes you just can't satisfy "problem customers".
Posted by: Dave | October 21, 2004 at 04:54 PM
hey, i'm always happy to point out men's failings!
Maybe that's why you have fewer orgasms.
Posted by: Zond | October 21, 2004 at 04:56 PM
"hey, i'm always happy to point out men's failings!" Sez Catherine.
While blind to her own.
Posted by: Richard Cook | October 21, 2004 at 05:01 PM
Catherine – perhaps you’re taking the wrong approach. Instead of, “tell[ing] your partner that he has no clue as to what he's doing,” how about, “Honey, you know what really turns me on… [adverb][verb][noun]…”.
Most men just want to please and will jump right in. If he doesn’t, find a new one; preferably a Republican.
Posted by: mark | October 21, 2004 at 05:13 PM
Catherine,
Glad to see you standing up for lies in a relationship. It renews my faith in women. They can't be trusted. Whose idea was it to give them the vote anyway?
BTW Wonkette - I still haven't found the pictures.
Posted by: M. Simon | October 21, 2004 at 06:49 PM
Hmmm, shouldn't that be "roll over, Wonkette"?
As for catherine, an admitted Democrat (even if she didn't intend such an admission), is probably dating Democrat men, exclusively. And since the Republican base has become ever so much more male over the last decade or so, and as such has pretty much become an affirmative test for testosterone, chance are catherine is dating self-selected girlie men.
No wonder she's not satisfied. She'd be better off with Republicans, but in a pinch could settle for a battery operated toy. Even that's gotta be better than a Democrat girlie man...
Posted by: Tim | October 21, 2004 at 07:31 PM
hey, i'm always happy to point out men's failings
Hmm. Shouldn't that be "shortcomings"?
Posted by: TM | October 21, 2004 at 08:14 PM
In my informal survey (rating the men I've had "experiences" with) - the absolute WORST was a very liberal Democrat ... and the best was (is) a Republican (my hubby).
Posted by: Carin | October 21, 2004 at 08:46 PM
Ha! None of you understand. We're Republicans. We have guns. I'd damned well better report that I'm very satisfied, nay, estatic over my sex life. Mama had that .38, Donks tend away from gun ownership so it's safe for those guys to be disatisfied.
Posted by: Peter | October 21, 2004 at 09:27 PM
If you're going to fake 'em, ladies, don't blame us for the result; we're doing the best we can with the faulty information provided by our intelligence services.
Posted by: Paul Zrimsek | October 21, 2004 at 09:29 PM
Catherine -
when the phone don't ring you'll know it's me.
Posted by: Jack Tanner | October 22, 2004 at 08:09 AM