Powered by TypePad

« He Was For Abortion Before He Was Against It | Main | Charter Schools Still Don't Work »

December 16, 2004

Comments

Bill Arnold

Why "weirdly"? Seriously.

TM

Normally I would expect the Times to make some mention of the horrors of gun ownership, or mention some ghastly police shooting. Amadou Diallo would not have been shot so many times, for example, if the police had been carrying revolvers, but they did not mention that.

Of course, maybe it is just my expectations that are weird.

Pouncer

From the NYT piece itself:

"More than anything else, it is carrying a gun ... that most sets apart the police from the policed."

The Sovereign from the Subject; the Rulers from the Ruled; the Masters from the Slaves; the Aristocracy from the Plebian Classes; the "Regimental Sergeant" from "the 'Eathen in 'is Blindness"; the Yeoman from the Serf.

Good Lord, is it even remotely possible that the Times might someday learn to appreciate the 2nd amendment?


BigFire

You use what you're used to. Or as one of the cop in the article says: if after 18 rounds (2 speed loaders later) I haven't hit the target, then, I have a bigger problem.

Bill Arnold

Pouncer,
The story is about New York City, which has to deal with far higher levels of personal interaction due to population density than the most places (and a higher possibility of hitting bystanders as well), hence NY City's stance on gun control. (I'll let the comparison of NYC Police Officers to Slave Masters slide. :-)

mark

I just bought a revolver... don't see why they were phased out.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Wilson/Plame