Powered by TypePad

« "I'm Proudly Willing To Say Anything" | Main | Longbowmen Of The Blogosphere »

May 23, 2005

Comments

Brainster

Did you see Daniel Okrent's parting shot?

"Op-Ed columnist Paul Krugman has the disturbing habit of shaping, slicing and selectively citing numbers in a fashion that pleases his acolytes but leaves him open to substantive assaults."

Jim Glass

PK:

"Everyone loves historical analogies. Here's my thought: maybe 2004 was 1928 ... Of course, the coming of the New Deal was hastened by a severe national depression. Strange to say, we may be working on that, too."

Another one for the clip file. Let's remember to look back in 2006/1930 to see how the Depression is progressing.

It seems a rather odd thing for one to muse and fancy about, but if we're down to it being the only way one can imagine of getting Democrats back in power again...

BTW, I'm waiting for Krugman the trade economist's column on the Democrats' opposition to CAFTA.

Neo

I have to say that using the "push to raise the minimum wage is a useful political barometer" is quite useful, but for the wrong reasons.
When a political party, usually the Democrats, wheel out the minimum wage, it is most often because they have run out of other legislative ideas. At the end of legislative session, reading the tea leaves based on this barometer can be most murky, but when it is invoked early in the legislative cycle, this becomes a true barometer of dearth, indicating the true lack or dearth of novel legislative ideas.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Wilson/Plame