Paul Krugman's latest column is cryptic even by his standards. However, I have been able to draw on my Starbucks-enhanced psychic powers to decipher the latest - and it is wild. Here we go:
What's the Matter With Ohio?
The Toledo Blade's reports on Coingate - the unfolding tale of how Ohio's Bureau of Workers' Compensation misused funds - deserve much more national attention than they have received so far. For one thing, it's an entertaining story that seems to get weirder by the week. More important, it's an object lesson in what happens when you have one-party rule untrammeled by any quaint notions of independent oversight.
In April, The Blade reported that the bureau, which provides financial support for workers injured on the job, had invested $50 million in Capital Coin, a rare-coin trading operation run by Tom Noe, an influential Republican fund-raiser.
...Meanwhile, The Blade uncovered an even bigger story: the Bureau of Workers' Compensation invested $225 million in a hedge fund managed by MDL Capital, whose chairman had strong political connections. When this investment started to go sour, the bureau's chief financial officer told another top agency official that he had been told to "give MDL a break."
By October 2004, state officials knew that MDL had lost almost the entire investment, but they kept the loss hidden until this month.
How could such things happen? The answer, it has become clear, lies in a web of financial connections between state officials and the businessmen who got to play with state funds.
Oh, boy, politicos and businessman in bed together - wake me up if the subject turns to cattle futures, real estate, and balked S&L investigations.
Krugman presents the Big Picture:
Now, politicians and businessmen are always in a position to do each other lucrative favors. Government is relatively clean when politicians are sufficiently afraid of scandal to resist temptation. But when a political machine controls all branches of government, and those officials charged with oversight are also reliably partisan, politicians feel safe from investigation. Their inhibitions dissolve, and they take full advantage of their position, until the scandals become too big to hide.
In other words, Ohio's state government today is a lot like Boss Tweed's New York. Unfortunately, a lot of other state governments look similar - and so does Washington.
...The message from Ohio is that long-term dominance by a political machine leads to corruption, regardless of the policies that machine follows or the ideology it claims to represent.
And he concludes with some ritualistic Rep-bashing (I can almost smell the incense, but that might be this especially aromatic blend I am sipping). [UPDATE: Somehow Krugman misses all these Dems and independents with union ties found by RedState - a majority of the oversight board, actually.]
So what does it mean? Surely the Earnest Prof does not expect his metropolitan readers to give a rat's rear area about financial shenanigans in Ohio. We have Eliot Spitzer to keep an eye on - NYC is the Big Leagues of financial scandal, and all we want or need to know about Ohio is that Columbus is where the Yankees have a farm team.
So here is the Bold, Caffeine Enhanced Theory (and do not attempt this at home!) - this column can only be read as a subtly disguised Hillary-basher. The ominous warnings about the perils of one party rule, the cozy financial dealings - he is taking us to Arkansas.
And why might the Earnest Prof be so reluctant to board the Hillary bus? Well, he was passed over for a spot in Clinton I, and showed his characteristic warmth and good humor after his rejection, so he may be on the outs with the future Ins. Or he may be heeding the guidance of his colleague Brad DeLong, who parked himself in the "Anybody But HER!" camp two years ago.
Time will tell. But if the next three years bring more of these disguised Hillary hit pieces, I will stand ready to decode them!
Meanwhile, this column also embeds a deeper riddle, with a funnier answer. Krugman identifies by name the chairman of the coin dealing company, but skips right past the chairman of MDL Capital. Why?
Why indeed, when a bit of research tells us that MDL Capital was founded by Mark D. Lay? How often does heaven rain these delightful coincidences down upon the Earnest Prof? Here is a name that evokes both Ken Lay *and* Tom DeLay in a column bashing Evil Reps for financial scandals - can it get any better, and how did Krugman miss this?
I'm only guessing here, but what may have given the Professor pause is this:
Mark D. Lay, an Aliquippa native who built his MDL Capital Management into the fourth-largest minority owned asset management firm in the country, appeared to be riding high in 2003.
In June of that year, the politically connected and civic-minded Lay was named Ernst & Young's Western Pennsylvania Entrepreneur of the Year for financial services. Four months later, Gov. Ed Rendell and the deputy premier of Bermuda joined Lay as he opened his firm's new headquarters on Smithfield Street.
Not so evident at the time was the mounting pressure some investors were putting on Lay and MDL, whose list of public and private clients ranged from the National Basketball Association to Allegheny County. Even as Lay offered in September 2003 to help the $14 billion Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation fund reduce its exposure to an anticipated rise in long-term interest rates, other clients were dropping him for subpar performances.
...
Lay, named one of the Top 50 African Americans on Wall Street by Black Enterprise Magazine, still lives in Aliquippa and teaches Sunday school at Tried Stone Baptist Church.
His higher profile engagements include serving as a director of the Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation, the Manchester Youth Development Center, Howard University's School of Business, Beaver County Head Start, and the Negro Educational Emergency Drive.
In the pension fund business where political ties frequently open doors to business, Lay had his share.
In Ohio, eyebrows were raised by the fact that MDL Capital's chief compliance officer is Mildred O. Forbes, daughter of Cleveland NAACP President George Forbes. The elder Forbes is also a member of the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation oversight board. George Forbes said yesterday he will step down.
Emphasis added. Let's revisit Krugman's presentation of that web of connections:
We're talking about personal payoffs: bargain vacations for the governor's chief of staff at Mr. Noe's Florida home, the fact that MDL Capital employs the daughter of one of the members of the workers' compensation oversight board, and more.
I have not yet verified that Cleveland NAACP President George Forbes is a Democrat, but I'll go on a limb here and bet he is. In fact, as some Dems bitterly recall, there are almost as many Dems as Reps in Ohio (Almost!). I'm guessing this little fact, if disclosed, might have jarred Krugman's moralistic tale.
[UPDATE: RedState thumps this point - of the five commission members, two were Dems and one was an independent with strong union ties. Oh, those evil Republicans!]
I wish I were done, since it has been delightful so far, but Mark D. Lay sounds like a good man with an interesting defense, and one might have hoped that an economist such as Paul Krugman would weigh in on it.
All of MDL's fixed income products have made money and returned positive financial gains to its clients and investors consistently. In fact, with the exception of the MDL Active Duration Fund. Ltd. in the State of Ohio, no fixed income client of MDL has lost money since our founding in 1992. With regard to a portion of our work with the Ohio Bureau of Worker's Compensation ("BWC"), MDL assumed a very specific and narrowly defined role to deploy what is known as an "overlay strategy." That strategy is designed to protect the overall fund against interest rate increases that could diminish the value of the overall fund. A strategy of this nature is a commonly accepted practice.
It must be maintained and understood that an overlay strategy of this nature and magnitude is prudent when protecting an overall fund valued at over $10 billion dollars."
More details are in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, and the Daily Kos. The gist - Mark D. Lay claims that his firm was running a hedge of Ohio's $10 billion bond portfolio. In Sept 2003, with the ten year Treasury ranging from 4.50% to 4.16%, Ohio was worried about rising interest rates (they were catching up to Krugman!). Last fall when the fund blew up, the ten year was around 4.20% to 4.03%. Using Fed Funds as a proxy for the repo rate, and seeing a range from 1% to 1.5% over the year in question, we will note that funding costs alone on a short position could exceed 2.5%.
So. might MDL Capital have lost $215 million by mimicking a short position in $10 billion of Treasuries? Yes. Was that what they contracted to do? Evidently, the state is saying no, MDL Capital is saying yes, and Paul Krugman is punting.
Too bad - throwing the Sinister Wall Streeters under the bus when deals go sour is a time honored tactic for municipal financiers across America, and that may be exactly what is happening in Ohio. If The Earnest Prof had made it to Update 2 when he read the Daily Kos, he might have delivered something stronger than his silly side-step.
MORE: More on Orange County and how County Treasurer Robert Citron was a genius until it all blew up, at which point he retroactively became a passive and compliant sheep led by unscrupulous Wall Streeters.
UPDATE: Let's bring RedState into the mix.
Yet, Krugman opposes private SS accounts which would take control away from politicians to give it those whose money it actually is.
Also, he wants "Medicare for all".
Is there a Nobel prize for self-unawareness?
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | June 17, 2005 at 12:00 PM
So Krugman writes: "Now, politicians and businessmen are always in a position to do each other lucrative favors."
And in todays paper I see: WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Halliburton Co. unit will build a new $30 million detention facility and security fence at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where the United States is holding about 520 foreign terrorism suspects, the Defense Department announced on Thursday.
Sounds like Krugman knows what he's talking about.
Posted by: creepy dude | June 17, 2005 at 12:17 PM
So the Capitol Coin investment returned more than most of the rest of the portfolio and the owner profited as well? When has anyone involved with government investments not been a political player? The state invested and the agent did as he saw fit with the investment and this is different from other fund management how? One difference is the high rate of return. Would you rather have an investment that returned twentyfive percent with a fifth of the profits going to overhead or an investment that returned two percent with half going to overhead?
The other article smacks of racism by implying that minorities get political cover for misdeeds until they are too visible; then they are tossed out with the bathwater in order to obfuscate the real culprits. The fact that politics in our country corrupts those who indulge is not precipitated by one party control or ideology. It is a universal factor and abused best when citizens turn their heads and cough when the corruption is exposed because it's "Their Guys".
Posted by: Beto Ochoa | June 17, 2005 at 12:41 PM
Irish - re Halliburton and Gitmo, at least the Administration has someone working there who has kept his sense of humor.
Now, if only Ken Lay can fly down for the ceremonial groundbreaking...
The other article smacks of racism by implying that minorities get political cover for misdeeds until they are too visible; then they are tossed out with the bathwater in order to obfuscate the real culprits.
Racism by whom?
Posted by: TM | June 17, 2005 at 12:53 PM
Except that's not really funny TM, it's actually quite sad.
Posted by: creepy dude | June 17, 2005 at 12:59 PM
Red-state.com is all over this, and confirms Forbes' Democratic affiliation-- though it appears he either hasn't seen or isn't impressed by Lay's defense.
Posted by: Paul Zrimsek | June 17, 2005 at 01:15 PM
Sorry to confuse the players. I was talking about the bureau using Mr. Lay as a scapegoat.
Posted by: Beto Ochoa | June 17, 2005 at 01:16 PM
Thanks, Paul, and a great job by Red State.
And no worries, BO, "articles" was pretty clear - I didn't think you menat me or my man Paul K, but just wanted to check.
Posted by: TM | June 17, 2005 at 01:36 PM
So, will The Krug throw his support behind Gov. Schwarzenegger's push in another famously one-party state to wrest control of those big fat pension funds away from the political appointees and give them to the people?
*Not holding breath*
Posted by: Crank | June 17, 2005 at 02:09 PM
What an amazing post - when is JOM Cafe going to open? (I've been wanting to nominate the name Just One Wafer).
I did like this line of Krugman's:
"In effect, they're trying to turn America into a giant version of the elder Richard Daley's Chicago."
How it must have pained him to not have a good Republican example at hand, as his means of avoiding the donkey-in-the-room parallel of "Tip O'Neill's Washington."
Posted by: Joe Mealyus | June 17, 2005 at 02:47 PM
when is JOM Cafe going to open?
Joe, we're going to sing up up! And I will blog anonymously at my own site under the new title "Just One Waffler" in order to steal typo-traffic from you.
Posted by: TM | June 17, 2005 at 02:58 PM
TM: I'm sure you were shocked to discover my Cleveland roots, and political party affiliation--but having my identity blown will not prevent me from making future comments, herein.
;-)
Posted by: Forbes | June 17, 2005 at 04:55 PM
Do you guys really think that prolonged one-party power is not going to lead to increased corruption? Does anyone honestly believe that? Given how in-line the whitehouse has the republicans in the senate and house, I mean, lets get real. One party-complete rule is bad whether its democratic or republican. You guys remeber "checks and balances", right?
Posted by: Jor | June 17, 2005 at 10:21 PM
George Forbes is a Democrat -- BIG TIME. He was president of Cleveland City Council for a number of years and effectively ran the city like, well, like Boss Tweed. Ironic, huh? Of course, such irony eludes Messr. Krugman.
Posted by: Bruce | June 17, 2005 at 10:21 PM
Jor,
"One party-complete rule is bad whether its democratic or republican. You guys remeber "checks and balances", right?"
Right. It specifically refers to the checks and balances established by the Constitution regarding the various powers granted the different branches of the federal government and state governments.
It doesn't mean, even slightly, checks and balances between political parties, which, some of us REMEMBER (catch the spelling), are not even mentioned in the Constitution, at all.
So, while you might have a debatable point regarding the potential for corruption in de-facto one-party states, your citation of Constitutional checks and balances as authority for your complaint is completely off point.
Regardless, Krugman is a putz.
Posted by: Tim | June 17, 2005 at 11:48 PM
Tim, I'm not talking about specific checks and balances -- but the idea of "checks and balances". People didn't always believe that government, or people in charge, needed any form of check or balance. God was directing them personally, and they could do no wrong.
Posted by: Jor | June 17, 2005 at 11:54 PM
Why isn't Krugman worried about New Jersey?
I am from Pittsbugh, PA - a stronghold of
the Dems - city is bankrupt. Enought said.
He,who is sadly tenured at Princeton, should
be asked:
What's the Matter With New Jersey?
"The message from Ohio is that long-term dominance by a political machine leads to corruption."....Paul Krugman
I think I have decoded his Nobel Prize. Remember the boys from MIT that programed a computer to write scientific papers using proper jargon, equations, charts and graphs combined into nonsensical and totally incomprehensible jibberish? Two of these very "professional looking and sounding" papers were selected for publication.
No one understood them but they were accepted by scientific journals. Think that is how Krugman won the prize. Problem is that now that he must use the vocabulary of
the laity, his insanity is exposed.
Note: I realize that Nobel Prize committee
is composed of socialists, which would
give anything Krugman proclaimed an edge.
Posted by: Larwyn | June 17, 2005 at 11:56 PM
I think it says something that Ohio is undoubtedly the only state with a statue of a man with a briefcase in its capital. It was probably full of money.
However, having said that, Illinois has been a very corrupt state for a century or so, and it didn't have one-party rule very often. In Illinois we have always had equal opportunity crooks. Now, Chicago, that's different, but it was crooked when it was run by Republicans, too.
And the state of New York is corrupt. New Jersey is incredibly corrupt. I seem to remember Connecticutt has had its problems.
Massachusetts. Can anyone say Big Dig? Kennedys? What's-his-name, "HoneyBucket" Fitz, father of Rose Kennedy?
Louisana? "Vote for the Crook. It's Important!" A succession of corrupt governors.
Paul, Paul, Paul: Maybe you should put off your Democratic blinkers for a bit and check in to this.
Posted by: JorgXMcKie | June 18, 2005 at 12:32 AM
JorgMcKie, 300 million dollars corrupt?
Posted by: Jor | June 18, 2005 at 12:58 AM
God, what an asshole you are. Krugman rightly points out that things in Ohio are a mess thanks to corrupt GOP rule, and you go LA LA LA I can't HEAR YOU!
Posted by: satntorum's dog | June 18, 2005 at 01:46 AM
"And I will blog anonymously at my own site under the new title 'Just One Waffler' in order to steal typo-traffic from you."
If I ever do start a blog, JOW would be almost perfect name - waffling is the core of my political philosophy. And I'm sure the traffic would be there to steal - everyone loves hard-to-follow prose and arguments that come to no conclusion.
Anyway to add to the hard-to-follow (and clueless)comments I've made here, let me suggest that the "cryptic" quality of this Krugman column disappears instantly when you take into consideration "style."
Read the first paragraph carefully:
"For one thing, it's an entertaining story that seems to get weirder by the week. More important, it's an object lesson in what happens when you have one-party rule untrammeled by any quaint notions of independent oversight."
For those who have argued for the "two Krugmans" theory, it's clear that the first sentence was written by Dr. Paul, the economist, but the second sentence was written by alter ego Mr. Krugman. What can one say to the idea that object lessons are more important than weird, entertaining stories? A muffled scream, perhaps.
And once it turns out that the object lesson has the upper hand over the weird story, the column is basically over. It's no use protesting that all sorts of relevant details are being left out - these elisions are necessary to the effective expression of Mr. Krugman's style.
Posted by: Joe Mealyus | June 18, 2005 at 02:16 AM
Hmm, is there anyway we can differentiate between Redstate.org and this Red-state.com when referencing them? It's certainly not a big deal by any means, it just bothered this caffiene enhanced mind. BTW, good post :D
-bro
Posted by: bro | June 18, 2005 at 02:49 AM
Hmm, is there anyway we can differentiate between Redstate.org and this Red-state.com when referencing them?
Until thirty seconds ago, I would have said "No", only because I did not realize there was a difference.
But you are a man of distinction, bro, so I'll see what I can do.
Posted by: TM | June 20, 2005 at 11:46 AM
Just for the record, I live in Columbus. We hate the Yankees and I hate their AAA team that plays here.
As for Krugman and one-party rule, he's right. Take a hard look at Columbus and the rampant corruption had by City Council and the mayor's office -- all Democrats.
Posted by: mclaren | June 29, 2005 at 09:33 AM
FDA approved drugs.
I know where to find cheap xanax.
xanax no prescription
xanax g3722
buy xanax without prescription
xanax exercise equipment
xanax without prescription
xanax exercise equipment
illegal xanax bar
Posted by: pneultFen | February 04, 2008 at 10:25 AM
Because the kal gold is very useful to upgrade equipment. Only your equipment becomes better, then you can win this game.
Posted by: kal gold | January 07, 2009 at 02:34 AM
When you have eve isk, you can get more!
Posted by: eve isk | January 14, 2009 at 02:03 AM