The CJR blog praises NPR for its fair and balanced coverage of the story of the bridge to Gretna, where local cops turned back people fleeing New Orleans. (We have earlier commentary and lots of links here and here.)
CJR's big finish:
Burnett [of NPR] did report the full story, but by doing something basic -- focusing on Lawson and Lee's point of view -- he illuminated a crucial aspect of a convoluted, touchy incident. Perhaps the easy answer of race -- or racism -- is not the only viable explanation. Perhaps Gretna officials, already having taken in thousands and fearing that things were getting out of control, felt they simply had no other choice.
I would urge the CJR squad to include in their coverage some account of the looting situation unfolding in New Orleans - the behavior of the Gretna cops gains a bit of context when we fold in the fact that they were blockading that bridge in the same time frame that Louisiana Governor Blanco was boasting that the National Guard was in New Orleans and "...these troops know how to shoot and kill and they are more than willing to do so if necessary and I expect they will."
MSNBC chats with the mayor of Gretna and adds a few new details about the problems already encountered in Gretna:
Like New Orleans, Gretna was pummeled by Katrina. The city lost power, water and sewer facilities. They had no shelters, no food no water and no capacity to take evacuees, Harris said. There was never a call from New Orleans that people were coming; there was never any plan to take them, Harris said.
But still they came, by the thousands, fleeing New Orleans, across the bridge. By Wednesday as many as 6,000 evacuees had massed in Gretna, Harris said. Gretna officials were commandeering buses “and for the next 12 to 14 hours began round trip shuttle service to Interstate 10 and Causeway (where there was a FEMA evacuation site),” Harris said. “Now that wasn’t our duty, that wasn’t our responsibility but that’s what we did.”
And at some point on Wednesday the lawlessness started. Nine stores inside the Oakwood mall were burned and looted, Harris said. Gretna police were fired on and roving gangs were going house to house “literally knocking on doors, holding guns in the faces of residents and saying ‘give us your cash, your jewelry and your car keys,’” the mayor said.
Undoubtedly there were good people just trying to escape, find safety and shelter, Harris said, but the crowd had a “criminal element” that had to be considered.
And that’s when the decision was made to block passage across the bridge.
“So the action taken was because we were not designated as a shelter, we were not designated as an evacuation route, we had no running water, we had no electricity, we had no food, OK? We had no sewer system. So I don’t know what all these people were planning on getting on when they came over here because every building in my department was damaged. A hurricane hit us, too,” Harris said, barely taking a breath. “Quite frankly we’re tired of answering the same questions over and over again.”
Well, that adds a bit of detail to the list of problems cited by the police chief in this Sept 16 AP story:
Looting and a fire inside the mall convinced Lawson that his city, itself without power and water, could not handle the masses pouring in from New Orleans.
OMG, Blanco said that? "...these troops know how to shoot and kill and they are more than willing to do so if necessary and I expect they will." She really did? Egad. I obviously have to pay more attention. Will someone please recall that idiot? GAWD. The woman has zero concept of leadership and *obviously* zero concept of the military as human beings. Whoo-hoo! We getta go kill people! Yay! Oh sure, that's it. Trained killers... more than willing to shoot American citizens... oh LOVELY.
And here I was wondering where Sheehan came up with the "occupied New Orleans" BS.
Posted by: Synova | September 23, 2005 at 03:02 PM
Hmmmm.
JustOneProblem though, sorry I couldn't resist, and that is if you look at Chief Lawson's actions on a map. He stops them on the bridge and then drives them, on three commandeered buses, westward past the Superdome about 10-11 miles from the roadblock. Then he dumps them at an overpass by telling the people that this is a FEMA collection point.
Is it? I haven't found anything to suppor that. Was there any water there? Any food? Did a cop stay with that group or did they just ditch them there?
Remember those tv images of all those people sitting on the side of the road, watching the FEMA buses drive on by?
Those were the people dumped there by Lawson.
Still happy TM?
Posted by: ed | September 23, 2005 at 05:04 PM
Ed, I'm always happy. When time permits I will dig through the trackbacks to some of my old posts on this - one blogger mapped out the route from the bridge to an evacuation point.
His (her?) point was that it was shorter, for hikers, to avoid the Gretna bridge and stay on the New Orleans side of the river.
But my point will be, yes, there was an evacuation point accessible by road from Gretna.
As to your theory - that the Gretna cops took 6,000 people to nowhere, but are now lying and saying they took them to an evacuation center - uh huh.
Posted by: TM | September 23, 2005 at 05:21 PM
"one blogger mapped out the route from the bridge to an evacuation point."
It's from Bruce Rolston's Flit site (required reading on this one). The point most folks are missing is that evacuating eastward into Gretna is going the wrong direction (unless you circle around to the I-10 site).
And Ed, I'm not seeing your objection . . . the I-10 site is along the only feasible evacuation route, and a heckuva lot better place to be "dumped off" than Gretna.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | September 23, 2005 at 05:37 PM
Well, I will add one other tidbit:
Parish Sheriff Harry Lee has caused a bit of a ruckus in previous years with some comments on crime in New Orleans. A number of black officials and representatives have not taken too kindly to his comments (and that's an understatement).
BTW, Sheriff Lee is a Asian-American, about 300 or so pounds (the last time I saw him). Speaks with sort of a Cajun drawl. Quite a mixture of cultures.
And he's very popular in Jefferson Parish.
SMG
Posted by: SteveMG | September 23, 2005 at 07:08 PM
People are trying to find irrelevant motives for restoring and keeping order. That was what was needed; that was what was done. EVERY other interpretation is so much horse patootie.
=================================================
Posted by: kim | September 23, 2005 at 08:20 PM
Hmmmm.
1. The site specified by Chief Lawson is a highway overpass. Is it a "rescue site"? Is a highway overpass really FEMA's idea of a rescue site?
If that's the case then why did all those buses drive past them?
2. Chief Lawson didn't have any food?
Zatarain's facility in Gretna
Or how about a ...
Wal-Mart Supercenter? Aren't Wal-Mart Supercenters a combined Wal-Mart and grocery store?
Or how abougt a ...
yet another Wal-Mart Supercenter?
Or perhaps a few of the 23 grocery stores located directly in Gretna itself? After all didn't all of the residents evacuate? So did Chief Lawson and his cops need the combined resources of all these facilities?
That's quite an appetite.
Frankly I'm unwilling to take people at their word without some supporting evidence. First off I'd like to know if FEMA actually designated a highway overpass as a "rescue site" or if that was something that got pulled out of someone's ass.
But the idea that Chief Lawson didn't have access to an enormous array of resources that could have easily supported these refugees, many of whom hadn't had water in days in very high temperatures and humidity, is an outright lie.
Posted by: ed | September 24, 2005 at 01:38 AM
Hmmm.
Causeway">http://maps.yahoo.com/maps_result?name=&ed=ixs0vep_0TqmSqdFRa3NpBNIVUpBuT0sXm1laiCSnjXSA.7IJHNbeKamk1Gfg6fVkjAfGy..dLiBfFa3iTZKbNgeyfWVhpMQ1m35kNwnyp7lgsQ-&csz=New+Orleans%2C+LA+70121&desc=&mag=3&ds=n&state=LA&uzip=70121&country=US&BFKey=&cat=trav&resize=l&trf=0">Causeway Blvd & I10
Is where they got dumped.
Or the WSJ.
"For a couple of days, Dr. Guarisco said, he directed a stream of patients to what he understood was a FEMA mass-casualty tent at the intersection of Interstate 10 and Causeway Boulevard. "A number came back and said, 'there's no one there.' " Dr. Guarisco said."
So what did the cops do then? Drive these people up in buses, drop them off at an empty intersection surrounded by brackish water, note the 17th Street Canal nearby on a previously linked map, with nothing?
*shrug* maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I'm just talking out of my ass. But having 23 grocery stores, Zatarain's factory and two Wal-Mart Supercenters in a 3 mile radius doesn't sound like a lack of resources to me.
Posted by: ed | September 24, 2005 at 02:14 AM
Hmmm.
Perhaps a clear timeline would help clear things up. Wednesday was when these people were shipped off to Causeway Boulevard & I10. So when did FEMA get there and start picking people up? Or did they bypass that site and go directly to the Superdome and Convention Center? And when did the buses arrive? Wasn't it around Saturday?
Posted by: ed | September 24, 2005 at 02:21 AM
Ed, you're asking why Gretna didn't have a sophisticated and comprehensive plan in place for tens of thousands of unexpected refugees. Get real, here.
==============================================
Posted by: kim | September 24, 2005 at 05:48 AM
Woulda Coulda Shoulda not stepped in that horse patootie.
=============================================
Posted by: kim | September 24, 2005 at 05:51 AM
And, believe it or not, there is a serious point in there. Woulda, Coulda, and Shoulda are important elements of deconstructing this disaster and improving future response. Still attempting to slant to fix blame is stepping in horse patootie. Tagging the Gretna police with all of these Couldas, when what they Dida was to keep order, under challenging circumstances, with changing tactics, warps the debate.
The after-action report is for improvement, not for warping history tooting one's own horn or muting another's.
It's Horse Patooting, and it's counterproductive.
======================
Posted by: kim | September 24, 2005 at 06:01 AM
The problem is, Ed, that if you try to hook ideology or blame to it, you will have otherwise sensible people get defensive and fail to see the best practical solutions.
So get together here and help out. Forgive and understand a little.
(Just practicing my speechwriting for Hillary).
=================================================
Posted by: kim | September 24, 2005 at 06:07 AM
"1. The site specified by Chief Lawson is a highway overpass. Is it a "rescue site"? Is a highway overpass really FEMA's idea of a rescue site?"
It was a designated "staging area" where they brought people they rescued (for subsequent transport via the Airport or Baton Rouge).
And yes, buses were slow. Here's a survivor story:Here's a doctor's view: "So did Chief Lawson and his cops need the combined resources of all these facilities?"I see. The "plan" is to take 'em all down to the Wal Mart and wait for the buses? (Lawson can direct: "you 10,000 go over there . . . you 10,000 over there." "No bunching up, now!") Somehow I don't think so. Moving the folks along to the next designated staging area seems reasonable, as does telling them to go back and wait when that's no longer feasible. Blaming the Gretna police for NO's poor evacuation planning is misplaced.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | September 24, 2005 at 08:16 AM
Cecil:
Great post as usual.
IIRC, Lawson said on WWL radio that no one was being allowed into Gretna during that period. Not even residents. The entire town was shut down.
I'm really unclear as to what this debate or argument is over. The city of Gretna didn't have the resources - personnel, food, water, medicine, et cetera - to handle an influx of thousands (tens of thousands?) of evacuees from New Orleans. The best they could do was to ferry or direct people escaping from the city into areas where it would be easier to airlift or deliver supplies to them.
The Causeway Boulevard (I've driven over it hundreds of times when in NO visiting relatives) - is a very long stretch of road that is well above aground and passes over the I-10 main highway - would be the best place to ferry people. Little chance of flooding, easier to land supplies et cetera.
Sound and fury....
SMG
Posted by: SteveMG | September 24, 2005 at 11:41 AM
Since the local news here in Los Angeles (KTLA) had a reporter on scene at what I take to have been this site, while the Chinooks and Blackhawks were shuttling in and out, I'm pretty sure it was a collection point, at least at some point in time.
And Ed, you're right of course, Sheriff Lee should have given away all the contents of those stores to the refugees. Not like his own residents were gonna need anything.
Posted by: richard mcenroe | September 24, 2005 at 05:26 PM
Right now. Arrest and bring Lawson up on charges and stop the chatter. He should get 20 years. In a disaster, a local official does not operate a fiefdom independant of state and federal.
Posted by: Mike H | September 25, 2005 at 09:38 AM
"Sheriff Lee should have given away all the contents of those stores"
I'm not sure how that was feasible, With only a few officers at his disposal (and those obviously being needed for crowd control). And again, Flit's graphic is critical to understanding the situation. He's got ~25,000 very annoyed folks sitting in the Convention Center, preparing to march over his bridge, and he's already got fires and looting. He can either allow them to cross over his bridge (and take responsibility for the inevitable), or stop them. He can't whistle up a couple hundred tons of food and water and deliver it.
"In a disaster, a local official does not operate a fiefdom independant of state and federal."
Utter nonsense. There was no state directive or federal plan the Gretna officials were ignoring. The NO mayor, after miserably failing to execute his own evacuation plan . . . and discovering he had a serious situation developing at the convention center, decided to foist it off on Gretna:
You want to blame someone for this, look at the NO officials, not the police force in Gretna (who apparently were on-the-job, and showing commendable initiative in unplanned evacuations to the I-10 staging area . . . in marked contrast to their compatriots across the river).Posted by: Cecil Turner | September 25, 2005 at 11:36 AM
Mike H.:
"Arrest and bring Lawson up on charges and stop the chatter. He should get 20 years."
Charges for exactly (or even vaguley) what crime? Twenty years for violation of what law or statute?
I'm certainly no lawyer but I doubt there's anything in the US Code (or state code) that would apply here. What law or laws are you talking about?
The city of Gretna, according to Aaron Broussard, Sherriff Lee and Chief Swanson, had no resources to deal with the influx of people from the city. What were they supposed to do with the evacuees?
The chatter you're referring to is the facts of the matter. A very tragic, ugly situation, to be sure, but one where the authorities seem to have made the best of a bad situation.
Maybe they're all lying; maybe Gretna did indeed have water and food to handle an influx of evacuees. But right now, there's no evidence of that.
SMG
Posted by: SteveMG | September 25, 2005 at 03:31 PM
Oh, yeah, brilliant idea. They shoulda let the people who burnt the strip mall go and burn the zatarains, 2 walmarts and 23 grocery stores. That would have be real helpful...
cathy :-)
Posted by: cathyf | September 25, 2005 at 06:11 PM
The MiaSMa rose from pools of floodwaters. It vivexed into the stream of news and consciousness. With the fever came delirium, reflections in a jaundiced eye. Call a doctor for the reporter and the Code Blue team for the Democrats.
=============================================
Posted by: kim | September 27, 2005 at 10:40 AM