I am a 44 year old female, around the age of twelve I began to grow the penis NOW promised would equalize me. When I reached the age of 40 I had my equalizer permanently removed.
Go figure, it takes MEN to open up the dialogue that females really do not grow penis, that we are biologically different, that we do approach thought and emotions differently and this freaks NOW to no ends.
I would like to attend and ask Mr. Summers if he has come to the conclusion as I, a first generation female born of radical feminism, that while Gloria Steinem burned our bras, is she leaving a legacy of sagging siliconed breasts worn by screaming helpless victims of everything including the plight of Eve Ensler's vagina and is it true, as most American feminist today believe, that in today's modern and prosperous world it takes an entire village for a helpless female to raise one child?
I read from history books that women at one time were able to birth and raise an entire village under circumstances far more 'untenable' that today's situation. Where are such women of strength and courage today?
Oh yeah, we have come a looooonng waaaay baaaby. Right into Hugh Hefner's paradise.
Seems to me you are taking a mighty big chance even asking a question like that. Apologize quickly and maybe you'll be able to salvage some small portion of your reputation.
There are two pretty entertaining debates already going on. One at Freakonomics, where Steve Levitt is debating Steve Levitt, another, which we might dub Foodfight at SDJ Corral, has Brad DeLong debating Brad DeLong.
He just highlights a pretty obvious correlation – legalized abortion (both as a result of Roe and earlier as a result of legislative change) was followed by a reduced crime rate. Bennett makes it racial.
It's that phony liberal raacial consciousnes that so misinterprets Bennett's comments.
The fact is that the right's attitude about race, though not monolithically unhypocritical, easily exposes the blatant hypocrisy and latent racism of the left's approach to color.
===========================================
Would Charlie Rangel like to moderate?
Posted by: Go Metro | October 01, 2005 at 11:07 PM
I am a 44 year old female, around the age of twelve I began to grow the penis NOW promised would equalize me. When I reached the age of 40 I had my equalizer permanently removed.
Go figure, it takes MEN to open up the dialogue that females really do not grow penis, that we are biologically different, that we do approach thought and emotions differently and this freaks NOW to no ends.
I would like to attend and ask Mr. Summers if he has come to the conclusion as I, a first generation female born of radical feminism, that while Gloria Steinem burned our bras, is she leaving a legacy of sagging siliconed breasts worn by screaming helpless victims of everything including the plight of Eve Ensler's vagina and is it true, as most American feminist today believe, that in today's modern and prosperous world it takes an entire village for a helpless female to raise one child?
I read from history books that women at one time were able to birth and raise an entire village under circumstances far more 'untenable' that today's situation. Where are such women of strength and courage today?
Oh yeah, we have come a looooonng waaaay baaaby. Right into Hugh Hefner's paradise.
Posted by: susan | October 02, 2005 at 08:38 AM
Seems to me you are taking a mighty big chance even asking a question like that. Apologize quickly and maybe you'll be able to salvage some small portion of your reputation.
Posted by: capitano | October 02, 2005 at 03:21 PM
There are two pretty entertaining debates already going on. One at Freakonomics, where Steve Levitt is debating Steve Levitt, another, which we might dub Foodfight at SDJ Corral, has Brad DeLong debating Brad DeLong.
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | October 02, 2005 at 04:50 PM
How is Steve Levitt debating Steve Levitt?
He just highlights a pretty obvious correlation – legalized abortion (both as a result of Roe and earlier as a result of legislative change) was followed by a reduced crime rate. Bennett makes it racial.
Posted by: TexasToast | October 03, 2005 at 12:06 PM
It's that phony liberal raacial consciousnes that so misinterprets Bennett's comments.
The fact is that the right's attitude about race, though not monolithically unhypocritical, easily exposes the blatant hypocrisy and latent racism of the left's approach to color.
===========================================
Posted by: kim | October 03, 2005 at 12:20 PM