Who was in Niamey, the capital of Niger, in February 1999? Jack Kelly of Irish Pennants has some questions, and we have some thoughts below.
Per the SSCI, the CIA had "reporting from 1999 which showed that an Algerian businessman, Baraka, was arranging a trip for the Iraqi Ambassador to the Vatican, Wissam al-Zahawi, to visit Niger and other African countries in early February 1999."
Now, bits of the SSCI are redacted, which just adds fuel to my fantasies, but check this, from a book published in 2000 by a London-based accountant who claimed to be a pal of A.Q.Khan, Pakistan's Father of the Islamic Bomb:
We left Dubai for Khartoum on 21 February 1999. The Education Minister of Sudan received the group and we were lodged at the State Guest House. After making a short stopover in a Nigerian city, we reached Timbuktu on 24 February 1999. After spending a couple of days, we were on our way back and our first stop was Niamey, capital of Niger. Our next stop was N'Djamena, capital of Chad, where we were accorded official protocol. Next day, we flew to Khartoum. After Dr.Khan has attended to some business, we visited the Shifa factory that was destroyed last year by the American missiles. Dr.Khan met the Sudanese President. We were back in Dubai on 28 February 1999.
Emphasis added. And was there a follow-up visit to Niamey? Why would I ask if there wasn't?
"We were again airborne for Timbuktu on 20 February 2000 (My comments: Musharraf had seized power on October 12,1999) From Dubai, we flew to Khartoum, where two Sudanese friends joined us. We reached Niamey, capital of Niger, on 22 February 2000. Our Ambassador Brig. Nisar welcomed the group and gave a dinner in honour of Dr.Khan. Brig.Nisar had also served as the Military Secretary of Nawaz Sharif. Niger has big uranium deposits. We reached Timbuktu on 24 February 2000.
What does it mean? Who knows? The CIA sent Joe Wilson to Niger in 1999 to check out some troubling reports; this report of Khan's travels came out in 2000, so presumably the CIA was aware of it in 2002.
Was Khan in Niamey? Was he there when an Iraqi delegation was there? Has this been debunked?
Oddly, there is no mention of AQ Khan in the SSCI. More fuel for the fantasists! (And I may become one).
If I were to dare to make a point, it would be this - there may well have been much more to the Niger-uranium story than we have heard so far, and the CIA may have had better reasons than we know for being suspicious of a Iraq-Niger connection. (Yes, I am waaay out on a limb there...) And the significance would be... hmm, that the CIA had reasons to be wary of a Niger-Iraq link, and that Joe Wilson is over-selling his account of his 2002 Niiger trip even more than we already thought he was (the SSCI described it as inconclusive).
Bonus Paranoia: Based on this bootleg FT excerpt, Libya had 2,600 tons of yellowcake from Niger, even though the COGEMA records and controls in which Joe Wilson put such faith showed only 1,500 tons had been shipped from Niger to Libya. Again, has this been debunked? And when did the unrecorded shipments to Libya occur? I am not clear on that point from this excerpt.
Pattycake, pattycake, Wilson's the Man.
Africa's as big as any one Khan.
You dig it, you shop it,
You pack it, you ship it.
Bake me a Yellow Boy as fast as you can.
===========================================
Posted by: kim | December 01, 2005 at 10:01 AM
Just because the ultimate source of the yellowcake is Niger doesn't mean it came from there directly. My guess is the Libyans got it from Pakistan.
Posted by: nittypig | December 01, 2005 at 10:10 AM
I cannot understand why Khan or anyone else in the world could even entertain making untowards attempts at getting uranium from a mine operated and controlled by the French in the first place. They all had to have been there for the goats.
Follow the goats.
Posted by: Dusty | December 01, 2005 at 10:20 AM
Goats pall. It was the dust and the flies.
===========================================
Posted by: kim | December 01, 2005 at 10:36 AM
Great minds, Tom. My editor was away yesterday when I sent this is..and so it didn't get published until today.
http://americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=3782
Posted by: clarice | December 01, 2005 at 10:45 AM
I wouldn't put it past Joe to have tried to score a bomb for the Wahabbi.
================================
Posted by: kim | December 01, 2005 at 10:55 AM
Well, Zahawi visited Niger February 5, 1999. So I don't quite see a connection between him being there and AQ Khan being there, at least not connected to each other directly. Certainly is interesting, though, that AQ Khan was perusing through Niger. Checking on his black market operation?
So, did Wilson get sent to Niger in 1999 to check out what Zahawi was doing there? Why not, oh I don't know, a CIA agent?
Posted by: Seixon | December 01, 2005 at 11:01 AM
Until TM gets Clarice's Link in an update ...
It's her American Thinker article on the subject.
Posted by: boris | December 01, 2005 at 11:05 AM
The very notion that these corruptocracies overseen by French bureaucrats could honestly account for all uranium sales is risible. Even more astonishing is that Il Giornale with resources representing a tiny fraction of the American msm's resources must be relied on for coverage.
Posted by: clarice | December 01, 2005 at 11:18 AM
Speaking of corruptacracies, what do you think the MSM is?
=====================================
Posted by: kim | December 01, 2005 at 11:33 AM
cathy :-)
Or maybe they got it from Iraq. Shorter trip and all, ya' know...Posted by: cathyf | December 01, 2005 at 11:56 AM
This is actually getting pretty funny - now Wilson's critics are saying that maybe he did debnk some forgeries, and, I suppose, his supporters will have to insist he was just BSing.
Posted by: TM | December 01, 2005 at 11:59 AM
But according to the Butler Report, the justification for the infamous "16-words" included "both Niger and the Democratic Republic of Congo".
Why did Butler think it necessary to include the Democratic Republic of Congo ?
We all know that Joe Wilson didn't go there, so what are we missing ?
Posted by: Neo | December 01, 2005 at 12:26 PM
TM, who said Wilson actually debunked some forgeries?
Posted by: clarice | December 01, 2005 at 12:27 PM
I seem to have found my own answer ..
"Again in February [1998] (there was) a visit [by Khan] to Mauritania where contacts were made with officials of the Republic of Congo and Somalia : countries reported by the CIA to the White House before the declarations made by George W. Bush in regards to Iraq :declarations in which the President mentions Africa, and not Niger, as the place in which Saddam was desperately seeking uranium.
Posted by: Neo | December 01, 2005 at 12:35 PM
AJ has interesting stuff and links along this line.
Posted by: topsecretk9 | December 01, 2005 at 01:10 PM
C'mon TM, what has Wilson ever debunked? Besides his own op ed of course.
Posted by: BurbankErnie | December 01, 2005 at 01:29 PM
When Tim and I a'huntin went,
We found three maidens in a tent.
Since there was nothing else to do,
Ibukone and Timbuktu.
Posted by: John | December 01, 2005 at 01:53 PM
Do I have this right? Did the CIA supposedly turn a blind eye to some trafficking in Niger and send Wilson on a CYA tour?
Isn't it accepted that at least somebody here in the States knew and tacitly permitted Khan to acquire the Islamic bomb?
I'm telling you, this one's flying right over my head, Clarice's piece notwithstanding.
Posted by: spongeworthy | December 01, 2005 at 02:23 PM
"'Khan visited Timbuktu for uranium'
Shyam Bhatia in London | February 17, 2004 19:12 IST
The London accountant who accompanied Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan to Timbuktu on three occasions in 1998, 1999 and 2000 says the 'father' of the Pakistani bomb witnessed the digging of a well, toured an ancient Islamic library and enjoyed the views of the desert.
A remote outpost in the middle of the West African desert, Timbuktu usually attracts explorers associated in the popular mind with the adventures of the comic character Tin Tin.
And Pakistani dissidents told rediff.com the reason for Khan's visit to Timbuktu, part of landlocked West African state of Mali, was to prospect for uranium.
Posted by: dogtownGuy | December 01, 2005 at 02:40 PM
Forgot to this from the Timbuktu link:
One year later in February 1999 Siddiqui again agreed to accompany a Khan-led group back to Timbuktu. This time Khan was accompanied by his chief scientific adviser, Dr Fakhrul Hasan Hashmi, Brigadier Tajwar, director General of Security at KRL and other senior officials of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission. This time the group flew via Sudan, Nigeria, Niger and Chad.
In February 2000 Siddiqui describes how 'we were again air borne for Timbuktu', this time from Dubai to Khartoum, then to Niamey, capital of Niger, where ambassador Brigadier Nisar, hosted a dinner in honour of Khan.
"Niger has big uranium deposits," Siddiqui notes without further comment. On February 29, 2000 the group returned back to Dubai after visiting 10 African cities.
Posted by: dogtownGuy | December 01, 2005 at 03:07 PM
Close down the CYA..It's worse than useless.
Posted by: clarice | December 01, 2005 at 03:17 PM
Last year he spent a week downstream from Timbuktu sipping mint tea and listening to Francophone assurances that no respectable Nigerian slave trader, gun runner, hashish merchant or blood diamond smuggler in the adjacent million square miles of howling sandstorm would stoop to dealing in uranium.
And what of malefactors from Mali, Algeria, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Libya, and Nigeria? Never fear: Niger's vigilant border patrol awaits them. None shall escape special visa fees stiff enough to leave impecunious Chads hanging.
Well satisfied, the intrepid Ambassador returned to Foggy Bottom, but Newsweek says that his verbal trip report "vanished into the bureaucratic maw."
"TRANSPORT-TRADE:Removing Trade Barrier from West Africa’s Roads
By Honore Yaovi Tchalim Blao on 11/11/1998 16:42:01 GMT
LOME, Nov 11 (IPS) - What’s new on the main road from northern Togo to Burkina Faso is that a major barrier to a smooth trade flow in West Africa - checkpoints and the host of policemen and gendarmes who man them - has disappeared. … (continue)
Posted by: dogtownGuy | December 01, 2005 at 03:40 PM
Tom, are you calling me a fantasist!? ;)
http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1007
http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/982
http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/980
Come on in! The kool aid is great.
Cheers, AJStrata
Posted by: AJStrata | December 01, 2005 at 04:51 PM
Oh my.
Just Oh My.
Posted by: Syl | December 01, 2005 at 06:00 PM
dtG, don't forget Gabon.
===========================
Posted by: kim | December 01, 2005 at 06:23 PM
Gabon pere,
Won't you dare,
Lay out bare,
What there is there?
====================
Posted by: kim | December 01, 2005 at 06:26 PM
Kim, you rang?
"Finally, the spatial concentration for uranium production is also very high. The USA 22%; Canada 19.3%; South Africa 16.3%; France 9%; and Australia 8.7%, between them provide three-quarters of the total production of the non-socialist world. The remaining quarter comes from three African countries, Niger, Namibia and Gabon. The location of uranium extraction has also changed recently; less is extracted in the USA and more in Australia and Africa, while total output for the non-socialist world has increased by one-third since the mid-1970s.
Recent changes in the location of world mineral activity have somewhat corrected the imbalance we noted between the relative shares of Africa in world resources and in world output at the beginning of the 1970s. Its relative share of world production decreased for copper, which was (and still is) over-exploited, and increased for bauxite and uranium, which were (and still are) under-exploited."
Posted by: dogtownGuy | December 01, 2005 at 06:50 PM
My economic geographer father would be proud of you.
================================================
Posted by: kim | December 01, 2005 at 07:04 PM
Stupid question. Why did Qadaffi fold up so quickly? Did we catch him doing something?
Posted by: TP | December 01, 2005 at 09:09 PM
TP as I recall, he was afraid we'd find out about his program. Plame's shop had no idea how far along he was. (Shades of the Pak program).
Posted by: clarice | December 01, 2005 at 09:19 PM
I was wondering if he figured we would find out about his program from any activities that would be uncovered by the deposing of Saddam.
Posted by: TP | December 01, 2005 at 09:37 PM
Now why the heck does Niger need to do this?
Niger guards get nuclear training
Country at center of CIA leak case
Thursday, December 1, 2005 Posted: 1301 GMT (2101 HKT)
SPECIAL REPORT
Niger
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
United States
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
NIAMEY, Niger (Reuters) -- Customs and border guards in Niger, the African country named in a U.S. intelligence scandal over alleged Iraqi uranium purchases, are being trained to fight the smuggling of nuclear materials, the government said.
International Atomic Energy Agency specialists, along with local experts, were giving a three-day course this week in the African uranium producer on the risks of handling radioactive material and how to detect trafficking of nuclear substances.
Posted by: dogtownGuy | December 01, 2005 at 11:40 PM
TM !
Check out this June 2004 item from Greg Djerejian at Belgravia Dispatch for yet another angle on this. He's got lots of stuff from FT -- which naturally never really broke the surface on this side of the pond.
Posted by: JM Hanes | December 02, 2005 at 01:22 AM
Very interresting, Greg's old column. It was deja vu all over again for me, because it reminded me of where so many of my idees fixes about Joe came from.
Ironic that he mentioned his news would not get displayed, even on Instapundit.
Also ironic is that he pointed out a clear FT/TPM battle, and we know that one's denouement. Why isn't Josh as well as all the rest of MSM addressing this?
Hunh, Doc?
==============================
Posted by: kim | December 02, 2005 at 08:21 AM
Neo- Republic of Congo is Congo-Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of Congo is Congo-Kinshasa. So the Khan contacts don't match the Butler reports.
Posted by: nittypig | December 02, 2005 at 09:00 AM
From Clarice:
TM, who said Wilson actually debunked some forgeries?
Hmm, aside from some of our friends on the left, maybe no one.
A couple of days ago, I posed a Bonus Question to folks who think that maybe he *did* debunk the forgeries - if he did, wouldn't it follow that the CIA engaged in a major whoopsie and cover-up, since, per the SSCI, they never reported the news that the docs were forged until a year later?
And reading your article, I got the idea that you were thinking it would be cool to revisit that point as well.
But I don't know of anyone on the right who is now claimign Wilson did debunk the forgeries.
Posted by: TM | December 02, 2005 at 10:31 AM
Why did Qadaffi fold up so quickly? Did we catch him doing something?
Yes:
According to reports, we'd been tracking the AQ Khan activities for years, mostly focused on the DPRK connection: But as Butler pointed out, they're interconnected (though it's not clear to what degree).Posted by: Cecil Turner | December 02, 2005 at 10:45 AM
More bonus paranoia: what did Saddam buy with his $3.5 billion "safe-haven" money? Doesn't look like a lot of regime members actually went to Libya. Might it have been for something else?
Posted by: Cecil Turner | December 02, 2005 at 10:52 AM
He's puttin' up in a tent.
===========================
Posted by: kim | December 03, 2005 at 09:56 AM
Maybe 3.5 billion dollars bought a bomb for Bush. It buys Khaddafi throwing in the towel-wrapped red herring and device acquistion pursued under the roses. Think like Saddam.
Maybe there is a little urgency to getting to the bottom of the Yellow Cake Mystery. He's known to do whatever he Khan. Means ethics mean nothing to him, and he had the means, or at least three and a half thousand million of the little mean ones.
Thanks to France, and the UN. God this is getting old. On Coleman, on Bolton, on Duelfer, and you with the Rossett moniker, get out in front.
=================================================
Posted by: kim | December 04, 2005 at 11:12 AM
Claudia, the Rosset monikered chronicler,
Has a newsy houndy nose.
That Saddam was a beast and a stinker,
Is just exactly what she shows.
=====================================
Posted by: kim | December 04, 2005 at 03:25 PM
TM--There is so much funny business about what--if anything--Wilson saw and when and from whom..Ditto with Buate (French member of the IAEA) and how Plam'es shop just happened to have misplaced the forgeries in their safe for 6 months. Then add that these were such very bad forgeries..
Oh, and remember-- Kristof set this off by reporting that Wilson saw the forgeries and tried to warn everyone off relying on them (even though as it turns out he never saw them cause they came in 8 months later) and NOW, years later, says Wilson never told him he like, actually saw them..
This is the most preposterous part of the Jivin Joe Envoy and his media chorus tap dance.
Posted by: clarice | December 04, 2005 at 03:47 PM
Clarice,
You cast this whole scenario ina whole new light. Wilson better hope his 15 minutes of fame are almost up.
Posted by: maryrose | December 04, 2005 at 04:10 PM
Nick could have a starring role in the new movie 'Driving Joe Envoy'.
==============================================
Posted by: kim | December 04, 2005 at 04:19 PM
Heh!
A French, not an Italian car, remember..And a bar stocked with tea and yellow cake for the trip.
Posted by: clarice | December 04, 2005 at 04:22 PM
Clarice. You have followed this a lot closer than I have, so I throw this suspicion out for comment.
When I hear, Africa, forgery and left wing Italian newspaper in the same sentence, I automatically think of Russia. They have used forgery as a method to drive wedges between the US and France before. Given the probability that they had a lot better Iraqi intelligence than almost anybody (including Saddam's war strategy), this would just be a natural for them. It is the gift that keeps on giving. First, it drives a deeper wedge between the USA and France and, second, it drives a wedge in the voting public here--a key to Saddam winning the war. (My guess is that Russia would be just as happy bleeding us for a few years--payback for Afghanistan).
If you review the execution of Soviet-Russian policy for the past 50 years, this is their style. France's style has been more one of hyperkinetic diplomacy. I wouldn't doubt for a minute Putin's ability to play on French (Chirac is an old fool) vanity and resentment of US hegemony.
If this is what happened, it only magnifies the level of CIA failure.
Posted by: TP | December 04, 2005 at 06:14 PM
Chi ciao chai?
Cha cha chai.
===============
Posted by: kim | December 04, 2005 at 06:14 PM
Could be just what Bush saw in Putin's soul. The Game is old, likely eternal.
================================================
Posted by: kim | December 04, 2005 at 06:16 PM
Kim. I've always felt like it is a Bush family trait to put too much trust in their worst enemies. I really think this has been the case with Putin.
My guess is that the Germans and French are going to be a little less comfortable with Vlad selling those missiles to the Iranians.
Posted by: TP | December 04, 2005 at 06:23 PM
Interesting. There's lots of stuff about the forgery being written and to me the most credible source of it is French intel(thru Martino). OTOH Iraqi intel followed the Soviet model and was trained by them..(It is why I am inclined toward the 9/11 attack as a "false flag" operation, a standard Soviet move.)
Posted by: clarice | December 04, 2005 at 06:24 PM
The whole Baathist organization, in fact, is modeled on the Soviets'..even the dissolving of the troops and reformation as a revanchist "insurgency" is out of old Joe's playbook.
Posted by: clarice | December 04, 2005 at 06:28 PM
Saddam's hero was Joe Stalin.
It will be interesting to watch the French on Syria. They have to feel a little used on the Iranian negotiations.
I don't believe the Cold War ever ended--entirely. The Russians still have interests and pretensions to be a world power, and like it or not, we are stomping around in their historic spheres of influence. Their country may be beaten up, but they are not broken and they still have pride.
Posted by: TP | December 04, 2005 at 06:38 PM
Putin puts Pershings in Psycho Poobahs Palms.
===========================================
Posted by: kim | December 04, 2005 at 06:52 PM
Yellow Cake! Yellow Cake!
How will it all shake?
I don't know who is gonna bake,
Even who is goin' to bust a take.
==================================
Posted by: kim | December 05, 2005 at 08:41 AM
Ah, C, the 'false flag' may even explain the lack of direct and voluminous links between Saddam and AQ. How Stalinist to have Zarqawi as link.
===========================================
Posted by: kim | December 05, 2005 at 08:49 AM
And the 3.5 billlion dollars may have run up a few false flags in Libya. Why wouldn't the money go to finance a continuing, even more clandestine operation to acquire a bomb? Maybe Saddam's bravado is rooted in the hope that the money may bear fruit.
============================================
Posted by: kim | December 10, 2005 at 09:34 AM
TP, Do not forget that whatever else was going on, Putin called Bush and warned him that his intel people had picked up solid evidence that Saddam was planning an attack againt the US and US interests abroad.
Posted by: clarice | December 10, 2005 at 11:27 AM