How can you not love the hapless NY Mets?
The crowd gave Billy Wagner a standing ovation as the closer sprinted to the mound last night with "Enter Sandman." Six pitches later, Brian Bannister could say good night to a win in his major-league debut.
Nationals rookie Ryan Zimmerman delivered a solo homer against Wagner - the subject of endless debate because his Metallica entry song matches Mariano Rivera's - to force extra innings.
Jorge Julio, another member of the Mets' revamped bullpen, then served up the game-deciding homer in the 10th as Jose Guillen belted a two-run shot. The Mets fell apart with a Paul Lo Duca passed ball and throwing error in a five-run inning as the Nationals beat the Mets, 9-5.
...Wagner had taken a lighthearted approach to the "controversy" with Yankee fans over his shared music with Rivera. When teammates warned him during spring training that his "Enter Sandman" entrance music would rile Yankee fans, Wagner replied: "Nah, surely they're definitely brighter people than that."
"Oh, well," he concluded yesterday.
Wagner actually found the topic hysterical. He even called former teammate Jeff Bagwell, who picked the song for him in 1996, to tell the veteran Astro to check out the New York media accounts on the Internet.
"I can't wait to talk to Mariano because I know he's going to be laughing about it," Wagner said. "Honestly, this is funny. It's the funniest damn thing I've seen in my life. They said anything can happen in New York.
"Does he wear Nike or Reebok? Maybe I've got to change that, too. I think he wears black socks, too. I have to stop wearing those."
Even if Wagner would have considered changing music, he said there's no way he could now because it would seem like he's caving in to Yankee fans. Steve Trachsel joked that the Mets should play the early 1990s metal tune when each Met came to the plate.
With the wisdom of Solomon, I propose that everyone change songs. Met relievers can stagger in to "Send in the Clowns". Alternatively, for a John Travolta / NYC feel, maybe the Bee Gees (pre-disco) hit "I Started A Joke" should be considered. And the transcendantly great Mariano has never had a heavy metal persona - his song always should have been the title theme from that old Clint Eastwwod classic, "For A Fistful of Dollars".
Wagner actually found the topic hysterical.
A few more, er, Zimmermann telegrams and the crowds at Shea will also be in hysterics.
[okay, I took the obvious route on that one; y'know, Mexico, illegal immigrants]
SMG
Posted by: SteveMG | April 06, 2006 at 05:41 PM
As a diehard Mets fan for many years, and has patiently endured the annual circus, I think I can safely say...
They have much more pressing matters they should be worrying about.
Posted by: Soylent Red | April 06, 2006 at 05:47 PM
I'm not sure what Mariano's theme song should be.
Is there a song called "I Singlehandedly Choked Away the 2001 World Series"? I'm not sure.
Posted by: Jim Davis | April 06, 2006 at 05:58 PM
Should we be looking for baseball analogies to start flying thick and fast around here, now that the spring season is underway?
Posted by: JM Hanes | April 06, 2006 at 06:37 PM
Should we be looking for baseball analogies to start flying thick and fast around here, now that the spring season is underway?
I tried to raise the bar (slightly) with my historical reference but abandon hope all ye who enter the batters box here.
SMG
Posted by: SteveMG | April 06, 2006 at 06:41 PM
Man its a tough crowd in NY.
Its funny though, I was listening to sports radio here in Houston yesterday. The Astros won their first game 1-0, and lost the second with no runs scored. The callers were screaming about the offense, the radio host was saying "I'm not going through this again this year" etc.
I mean yeah, they're probably going to have a weak offense again this year. But good grief they went to the World Series for the first time last year. And its only 2 games FGS.
I was laughing at them. Baseball is most definately not an instant gratification sport. Time dudes, patience.
Posted by: Dwilkers | April 06, 2006 at 06:47 PM
Dwilkers
"Baseball is most definately not an instant gratification sport."
I'm laughin' with you here. I recall a study of different sports, some years ago, comparing the percentage of time the ball/puck etc. spends in play. Almost needless to say, baseball had the most down time from play to play of all, by a hefty margin, hence the importance of, shall we say, ancillary ephemera like stats, theme songs, (beer) and long standing curses...
Posted by: JM Hanes | April 06, 2006 at 07:38 PM
SteveMG
"abandon hope all ye..."
The classics are always a great place to start, but now that you've taken a practice swing at applying Dante to baseball I think you should be ready to go all out and take a shot at applying baseball to Dante, no?
Posted by: JM Hanes | April 06, 2006 at 07:51 PM
take a shot at applying baseball to Dante, no?
As a kid I grew up rooting for the Washington Senators (ouch). A separate circle for those poor lost souls (spectators, not the Nats; well maybe both).
It was from there we emerged, once more to see the stars.
Now I root (mostly) for players - Albert Pujols, Jake Peavy et al.
SMG
Posted by: SteveMG | April 06, 2006 at 08:32 PM
Six pitches later, Brian Bannister could say good night to a win in his major-league debut.
The curse of Mariano?
You don't mess with Mo, or, er, his song.
Posted by: Jim in Chicago | April 06, 2006 at 09:22 PM
What I wouldn't give for a closer to adopt Billy Joel's "We Didn't Start the Fire" as their entrance music.
Posted by: SaveFarris | April 06, 2006 at 09:35 PM
to see the stars...
:)
O fickle fans! Be wary how ye judge, for we know not yet the number of the chosen.
Posted by: JM Hanes | April 06, 2006 at 10:42 PM
Trying to remember the Italian. This is from memory (and the only line I remember so don't be too impressed)
E uscime a riveder a la stella
"It was from there we emerged, once more to see the stars."
Magnificent.
Something like that. I googled but can't find it.
If Stengel's in Hell (terrible thought I know), does he have to watch Marv Throneberry hit a game-winning 3-run homer only to miss stepping on first, second, third and home?
Over and over and over again?
SMG
Posted by: SteveMG | April 06, 2006 at 11:58 PM
Lo duca e io per quel cammino ascoso
intrammo a ritornar nel chiaro mondo;
e sanza cura aver d’alcun riposo,
salimmo sù, el primo e io secondo,
tanto ch’i’ vidi de le cose belle
che porta ’l ciel, per un pertugio tondo.
E quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle.
It seems highly unusual to have imported this from what I believe is a New York Times owned site at About.com without critiquing it for accuracy....
"If Stengel's in Hell (terrible thought I know), does he have to watch Marv Throneberry hit a game-winning 3-run homer only to miss stepping on first, second, third and home?
Over and over and over again?"
Sounds more like wondering onto a Pirandello stage to me, although I imagine that might have a certain hellish quality of its own.
Posted by: JM Hanes | April 07, 2006 at 02:52 AM
"For A Fistful of Dollars".
Sergio Leone made a film called A Fistful of Dollars. Then he made one called For a Few Dollars More.
Has anyone ever noticed how Mr. Choo-choo (in Once Upon a Time in the West) trying to get to the sea works as an amazingly prescient parable of Steinbrenner trying to win another championship after 2001?
Posted by: Joe Mealyus | April 07, 2006 at 04:34 AM
You might like this blog. A somewhat irreverent look at baseball, mostly the Mets and the Red Sox. It can be pretty funny, these guys are obsessed.. the commentary on October 2004 is hysterical.
East Coast Agony
Posted by: pollyusa | April 07, 2006 at 08:29 AM
Is there a song called "I Singlehandedly Choked Away the 2001 World Series"? I'm not sure.
Huh? Mariano had three saves (oops, two saves and a hold) and five scoreless innings when the Yanks worked their late-inning lightning in New York.
That ninth inning of Game 7 did not go so well.
Posted by: TM | April 07, 2006 at 09:37 AM
>That ninth inning of Game 7 did
>not go so well.
Kind of important, wouldn't you say?
Astounding that a man can choke away a Game 7 lead in the 9th, including hitting a batter and throwing a ball into centerfield, recording only 1 out on a bunt... and no one ever brings it up.
Rivera is right alongside Buckner for Greatest World Series Chokers.
Posted by: Jim Davis | April 07, 2006 at 05:02 PM
"Rivera is right alongside Buckner for Greatest World Series Chokers."
Yeesh. Rivera, through 2004, appeared in 70 postseason games, pitched 108.2 innings and allowed 11, count them 11, runs. He's about as unBucknerlike as you can get; you have to recognize greatness, no matter how unappealing a uniform it plays in.
Posted by: Joe Mealyus | April 08, 2006 at 03:18 AM
Right. And Buckner only had one ground ball go through his legs.
Choking away a world series is choking away a world series. That is the point. You have to recognize a choke job for the ages, no matter what uniform the choker plays in.
Posted by: Jim Davis | April 08, 2006 at 08:32 AM
Andujar '82 or ?
==========
Posted by: kim | April 08, 2006 at 11:08 AM
That whole year is deleted.
===============
Posted by: kim | April 08, 2006 at 11:09 AM
Rivera is right alongside Buckner for Greatest World Series Chokers.
Buckner would be thrilled to be put alongside Rivera.
Most people think of "choking" as folding up under pressure. And someone with an exemplary record of succeeding under pressure is generally given a pass for rare miscues what is, after all, an unpredictable game that includes an opposing team also trying to win.
Posted by: TM | April 08, 2006 at 07:29 PM
Hey Steve, Bob Lemon and Roy Sievers are in limbo and their prayers are being directed to the Power via "Cake' Lavagetto.
=======================================
Posted by: kim | April 09, 2006 at 08:46 AM
OK, at least you are no longer trying to argue Rivera did NOT choke away the 2001 World Series. Calling it a "miscue" is fairly hilarious, however.
Which part was the miscue -- giving up the single, the double, the other single, hitting the batter, or throwing the ball into centerfield?
Just call it what it is --Rivera pulled off one of the greatest individual choke jobs in baseball history.
Saying this does not detract from anything else he has done. Go ahead, try it. You'll feel cleansed.
Buckner 1986, Rivera 2001.
Posted by: Jim Davis | April 09, 2006 at 09:38 AM
"Buckner 1986, Rivera 2001."
A good way of explaining why Jim Davis is being silly (besides the fact that his strip sucks) is that the idea of Buckner as a "choker," agree with this label or not, is that with a different player at first base, the Red Sox win 1 WS title instead of 0. I.e., they gain a title.
If the Yankees had not had Rivera, no serious follower of baseball thinks that they would have been likely to win *more* than 4 WS titles between 1996 and 2001. Even if you replace Rivera with another very very good relief pitcher, I don't think there's any way the Yankees can win 4. So you take away Rivera, you lose a WS title or 2. I.e., calling Rivera a "choker" is kind of frivolous.
Posted by: Joe Mealyus | April 10, 2006 at 01:26 AM
The point is, and has always been, thus:
Mariano Rivera singlehandedly choked away the 2001 World Series. I've yet to see an argument that this is not true.
I've seen arguments that he is a good player, and that the Yankees at that time were a good team. I've seen arguments that Yankee fans are willing to forgive him. All very nice.
The point still stands. And it is hardly an irrelevant point, as Mr. Buckner would attest. When you end your baseball career, one of things you will ponder is this: "How many times did my team take the the field, just three outs away from winning the World Series, only to lose it, and it was ENTIRELY MY FAULT?"
Current score:
Buckner 1
Rivera 1
Others?
Posted by: Jim Davis | April 11, 2006 at 04:12 PM
[email protected]
Dear Buyers,
Buy Nokia,N70,N80,N90,N91,N92,6600,6680,8800,9300,9500,Motorola Razr V3, Nextel i930. And Manymore At Very Low Price.Ok
Nokia 1261 Nokia 2100 Nokia 2220 Nokia 2260 Nokia 2300 Nokia 2300a Nokia 3100 Nokia 3100b Nokia 3108 Nokia 3200b Nokia 3210 Nokia 3285 Nokia 3300 Nokia 3300b Nokia 3310 Nokia 3315 Nokia 3320 Nokia 3330 Nokia 3350 Nokia 3360 Nokia 3390 Nokia 3395 Nokia 3410 Nokia 3510 Nokia 3510i Nokia 3520 Nokia 3530 Nokia 3560 Nokia 3585 Nokia 3590 Nokia 3595 Nokia 3600 Nokia 3610 Nokia 3620 Nokia 3650 Nokia 3660 Nokia 3810 Nokia 5100 Nokia 5100a Nokia 5110i Nokia 5120 Nokia 5125 Nokia 5130 Nokia 5148 Nokia 5160 Nokia 5180 Nokia 5185 Nokia 5190 Nokia 5210 Nokia 5510 Nokia 6090 Nokia 6100 Nokia 6108 Nokia 6110i Nokia 6120 Nokia 6130 Nokia 6138 Nokia 6150e Nokia 6160 Nokia 6162 Nokia 6185 Nokia 6188 Nokia 6190 Nokia 6200 Nokia 6210 Nokia 6220 Nokia 6250 Nokia 6310 Nokia 6310i Nokia 6340 Nokia 6340i Nokia 6360 Nokia 6500 Nokia 6510 Nokia 6560 Nokia 6590 Nokia 6590i Nokia 6610 Nokia 6650 Nokia 6800 Nokia 6800a Nokia 6810 Nokia 6820 Nokia 6820b Nokia 7110 Nokia 7160 Nokia 7190 Nokia 7200 Nokia 7210 Nokia 7250 Nokia 7250i Nokia 7600 Nokia 7650 Nokia 8110i Nokia 8146 Nokia 8148i Nokia 8210 Nokia 8260 Nokia 8270 Nokia 8290 Nokia 8310 Nokia 8390 Nokia 8810 Nokia 8850 Nokia 8855 Nokia 8860 Nokia 8890 Nokia 8910 Nokia 8910i Nokia 9210i Nokia 9250 Nokia N-Gage
w full detailsco Looks like Nokia's announced their new E60, E61, and E70 3G (WCDMA) phones with WiFi and mobile mail targeting mobile business users (yes, it's got GoodLink, Nokia Business Center, Seven Always-On, Visto Mobile, and BlackBerry Connect support). All the Series 60 Es run on Symbian OS 9.1 and will support advanced voice services such as Push-To-Talk and SIP allowing companies to integrate these phones into their Avaya or Cisco IP PBX (think 4-digit dialing and assisted call answering). The E60 candybar is optimized for voice and targets GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 and WCDMA2100 networks while the E61 takes a shot off the Motorola Q's bow and includes all the IP telephony functions but is optimized for mobile email and operates in quad-band GSM and WCDMA 2100 networks. The E70 is their enterprise all-in-one messaging device and will be released in two flavas: one for Europe and Asia and another for the Americas. Available in the first quarter of 2006 worldwide priced nquiries Please Contact The Following Blow:
Tel:+2348060272599Email: [email protected]
[email protected]
Thanks And God Bless
Mr.meyers jay
Director T
Posted by: meyers jay | April 11, 2006 at 05:43 PM
Dear Buyers,
Buy Nokia,N70,N80,N90,N91,N92,N93,6600,6680,8800,9300,9500,
Motorola Razr V3i, Nextel i930.New T-Mobile Sidekick3 Phones For Low Price And Manymore At Very Low Price.Ok
Contact The Following Blow:
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Thanks And God Bless
Mr.Alex Kurt
Director.
Posted by: Mr.Alex Kurt | October 16, 2006 at 10:15 PM