TruthNot, having promised "a more comprehensive accounting" of their "Rove Indicted" debacle from last May 13, delivers a compelling graphic explaining why Special Counsel Fitzgerald can't be stopped in his pursuit of the Evildoers.
At least they remain true to the TruthNot motto - Speak Truth to Power, deliver BS to everyone else.
With almost as much seriousness, Marc Ash provides some text telling us that yes, Rove really was indicted. The short version is a re-hash of the fantasy still prevailing among lefties who can't let go - Rove has given up the key evidence on Cheney, who will be getting his come-uppance within the next 24 business hours (i.e., at about half-past never).
The TruthNot piece makes no sense, but let's highlight this special nonsense:
The electronic communication from Fitzgerald to Luskin, coming immediately on the heels of our Monday morning, June 12 article "Sealed vs. Sealed" that became the basis for the mainstream media's de facto exoneration of Karl Rove was, our sources told us, negotiated quickly over the phone later that afternoon.
Pretty good inside stuff, yes? The phone rings, Luskin is on the line, and the TruthNot source is there!
But wait! Who, other than Marc Ash, has forgotten their classic lead from the May 13 piece?
Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald spent more than half a day Friday at the offices of Patton Boggs, the law firm representing Karl Rove.
During the course of that meeting, Fitzgerald served attorneys for former Deputy White House Chief of Staff Karl Rove with an indictment charging the embattled White House official with perjury and lying to investigators related to his role in the CIA leak case, and instructed one of the attorneys to tell Rove that he has 24 business hours to get his affairs in order, high level sources with direct knowledge of the meeting said Saturday morning.
Robert Luskin, Rove's attorney, did not return a call for comment. Sources said Fitzgerald was in Washington, DC, Friday and met with Luskin for about 15 hours to go over the charges against Rove...
How could sources who can tip TruthOut to a single phone call be wrong about a fifteen hour meeting? Or does TruthOut still fantasize that such a meeting occurred? Well, here is their current punchline:
Our sources continue to maintain that a grand jury has in fact returned an indictment. Our sources said that parts of the indictment were read to Karl Rove and his attorney on Friday, May 12, 2006.
Wow - they spent fifteen hours reading "parts of the indictment" to Karl Rove and his attorney? That raises the bar on "tedium" to absurd heights - "Like watching paint dry" will never mean "boring" again.
Let's close with this:
That leaves the most important question: If our sources maintain that a grand jury has returned an indictment - and we have pointed to a criminal case number that we are told corresponds to it - then how is it possible that Patrick Fitzgerald is reported to have said that 'he does not anticipate seeking charges against Rove at this time?' That is a very troubling question, and the truth is, we do not yet have a definitive answer.
They don't have a definitive answer, but... the trial is not until next January, prosecutors aren't normally in the business of announcing non-indictments, so Keep Hope Alive!
MORE: J Pod thinks this is all about traffic and donor support at TruthNot. Here is an idea - Marc Ash should hint that Evil Forces are trying to quash and discredit their story, and it is only his readers and fellow fantasists that stand between Truth and the Dark Side. Ahh, yes.
GOOD POINT - I may have misinterpreted the graphic stolen shamelessly from a commenter at Donklephant. Maybe TruthNot is showing us how Evil Dick Cheney can be unstoppable in his intimidation of the Truth-Tellers. You make the call.
PROPS TO DU: A Democratic Underground sleuth debunked the TruthOut "sealed versus sealed" fantasy a while back. The gist - in the DC circuit, cases are assigned a docket number in sequence. A sealed case will still get a number in sequence, but will be missing from the docket.
And the case on which TruthNot pins their hopes, 06 cr 128, falls between two cases assigned numbers on May 16 and May 17.
Since Rove was indicted on May 12, that does not work.
Here is an excerpt. Good job.
The criminal docket doesn't list a 06-CR-128; it's completely missing from the docket. This is typical for sealed cases in the DC courts. However, we can tell when it was filed based on the dates of the surrounding cases. Here's the complete list of criminal cases filed in the DC district court from May 10 - May 23, 2006.
1:06-cr-00123-HHK
USA v. MANSOER Filed: 05/10/2006 Office: Washington, DC
1:06-cr-00125-RBW
USA v. DORIUS et al Filed: 05/12/2006 Office: Washington, DC
1:06-cr-00126-JDB
USA v. ABDOULAYE Filed: 05/12/2006 Office: Washington, DC
1:06-cr-00127-RWR
USA v. CURRY Filed: 05/16/2006 Office: Washington, DC
1:06-cr-00129-RMC
USA v. WASHINGTON Filed: 05/17/2006 Office: Washington, DC
1:06-cr-00131-PLF
USA v. HILLIARD Filed: 05/18/2006 Office: Washington, DC
1:06-cr-00132-EGS
USA v. MANOR Filed: 05/18/2006 Office: Washington, DC
1:06-cr-00136-HHK
USA v. GARCIA Filed: 05/23/2006 Office: Washington, DC
No 06-CR-128 listed at all. But the case before it, CR-127, was filed on May 16, 2006. And the case after it, CR-129, was filed on May 17, 2006. Therefore, we know that 06-CR-128 was filed either May 16 or May 17th. According to Leopold's original story, Rove was indicted (secretly) on May 12th. In his new "Sealed vs. Sealed" story, he says "As of Friday afternoon that indictment, returned by the grand jury the week of May 10th, remains under seal.. The case number is "06 cr 128." But based on the dates in the docket, that case cite CANNOT be the Rove indictment. This case was filed on Tuesday, May 16 or Wed., May 17th - NOT May 12th (when Fitz supposedly met w/the grand jury), and NOT during the week of May 7 - May 13th.
JUST IN: Don't ignore the possibility of time traveling aliens. I thought they were working for Karl, but maybe a rival faction interceded.
Extensive links to your material on the TruthinessOut.com "fake but accurate" story. Thanks.
http://www.nerepublican.com/index.php/2006/06/22/pass-the-popcorn-leftmoonbatwingnut-blog-implosion/
Posted by: docweasel | June 22, 2006 at 02:57 AM
Well, I'm kinda bummed, 'cause the new comment thread is pretty dull. TruthOut has apparently banned so many commenters that there's not even any rabble-rousers left. The regulars' ability to reconcile contradictory information is impressive (as noted from the last post of the previous thread):
. . . but it's not nearly as entertaining as watching them try to rebut a YGBSM comment.Posted by: Cecil Turner | June 22, 2006 at 08:07 AM
TS:I stole this theme from you, you know?
Yay!
Posted by: MayBee | June 22, 2006 at 09:53 AM
Wislons 'little literary flair' regarding thigs he knew in the intelligence community
most likely meant he LEARNED THEM FROM HIS WIFE!!.
Maybe that's why she was called FLAME.
Got a flair from the Flame.
Of course he couldn't admit that his wife tends to share intel with him...which would be an interesting question if Fitz ever put him on the stand.
Posted by: Patton | June 22, 2006 at 12:27 PM
Think Tooth Not would by the 15 hours of:
Fitz: Your guilty!
Rove: Am Not.
Fitz: Are too.
Rove: Am Not.
Fitz: Are too.
Rove: Am Not.
Fitz: Are too.
Posted by: Patton | June 22, 2006 at 12:55 PM
Anyone think its weird that MSNBC Keith Olberman has covered the 'Libby' story the last couple nights and seems to be hopeing/praying for a Presidential pardon of Libby.
I haven't watch the show, just caught part of it flipping channels.
It just seemed odd that they should be pressing now for discussions of pardoning Libby..maybe not wanting to see this case proceed.
Posted by: Patton | June 22, 2006 at 12:59 PM
Seixon's on a roll.
Here's a review of all Jason Leopold's reporting on Plame since October 2003. Everyone of these lying tales is sourced to the VIPS (a group of lying ex-CIA guys linked to Joe Wilson).
"There's a lot to be revealed and said about Jason Leopold's earlier reporting, in addition to the Karl Rove indictment story. One could speculate that the unwillingness of Truthout to reveal their sources may have to do with the fact that those same sources may have been involved in virtually all of Truthout's reporting on the issue going back into October 2005.
The Leopold "Missing Emails" series seems to be partially or completely baseless, while promoting the idea that Cheney is the focus of the probe, a notion that has only come from journalists connected to VIPS: Jason Leopold and Richard Sale. Ray McGovern, EIR (where McGovern contributes), and Leopold's reporting repeated as late as last month the claim that Cheney is the real target of the probe.
This is not a coincidence, it is a planned and orchestrated propaganda campaign."
http://www.seixon.com/blog/archives/2006/06/leopold_story_t.html#more
Posted by: clarice | June 22, 2006 at 09:04 PM
Clarice, you see that PBS is airing a show about Cheney tongiht?
Posted by: Lurker | June 22, 2006 at 09:19 PM
I read it--and boy does that lineup look like a pack of stinkers.
Posted by: clarice | June 22, 2006 at 09:36 PM
There's been a scandal brewing as it turns out Kos has been endorsing candidates his partner, Jerome Armstrong, has received consulting contracts from, and it has turned out that Armstrong has an unsavory record of pumping stocks he had an interest in for which he entered into an SEC settlement agreement. Riehl notes that Armstrong also had a history as an astrologist and analyzes why the netroots will fail. I love this conclusion:
"I predict the Dems will take all fifty states when Venus aligns with Jupiter and kisses Mars butt. Pardon me if I don't ask the latest Democrat wizard-kid what he has to say about that."www.riehlworldview.com/ca...troot.html
Posted by: clarice | June 23, 2006 at 10:15 AM
Apparently, the TruthNot guys never considered this.
Posted by: Neo | June 23, 2006 at 03:36 PM
If you buy last chaos gold, you will like it.
Posted by: buy last chaos gold | January 07, 2009 at 03:53 AM
When you have LOTRO Gold, you can get more!
Posted by: LOTRO Gold | January 14, 2009 at 03:44 AM