Props to Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs, who gets coverage in USA Today, the WaPo, and the NY Times for busting some phony Reuters photos over the weekend [and Mr. Johnson responds].
Let's flag a Self-Awareness Alert and excerpt some Times coverage:
[Reuters] has tightened its procedures so all photos from the Mideast are now reviewed by senior editors.
Other news outlets have also tightened their procedures after learning the hard way about the heightened risk of photo manipulation. Last month, The Charlotte Observer fired a photographer who enhanced the color of the sky in a local photo to make it more dramatic. The Los Angeles Times fired a photographer in 2003 after he altered an Iraq photo that it ran on the front page.
Santiago Lyon, director of photography for The Associated Press, said his agency fired a photographer “in the last year” for changing a picture; he gave no further details.
The volume of photos that cross news desks and the speed with which they must be handled adds to worries of photo editors.
Any day now the Times reporters can update their coverage with a quote from the NY Times photo editors and a discussion of revisions in the Times policy - this "Dead Man Walking" photo montage makes a pretty compelling case that a young man in cut-off jeans and a cap shown participating in a rescue effort inexplicably became a bombing victim himself in photo 6 of a Times report from July 27 - here is the caption originally accompanying the Times website version:
The mayor of Tyre said that in the worst hit areas, bodies were still buried under the rubble, and he appealed to the Israelis to allow government authorities time to pull them out. (Photo Tyler Hicks The New York Times)
But wait! Now we have a correction in the Times:
A picture caption with an audio slide show on July 27 about an Israeli attack on a building in Tyre, Lebanon, imprecisely described the situtation in the picture. The man pictured, who had been seen in previous images appearing to assist with the rescue effort, was injured during that rescue effort, not during the initial attack, and was not killed.
The correct description was this one, which appeared with that picture in the printed edition of The Times: After an Israeli airstrike destroyed a building in Tyre, Lebanon, yesterday, one man helped another who had fallen and was hurt.
He's fallen and he can't get up.
MORE: A suggested Times' caption. And an unlucky Lebanese homeowner.
THIS is what you have been toiling over?
Tsk, tsk.
"Watch me pull a rabbit outta my hat.
Nothin' up my sleeve.............
Better get another hat."
Misdirection may be the only tactic left.
So, use it well.
Posted by: Semanticleo | August 09, 2006 at 12:08 PM
Ever notice how the doctoring always favors the same viewpoint?
Posted by: Other Tom | August 09, 2006 at 12:12 PM
Ever notice how the doctoring always favors the same viewpoint?
Posted by: Other Tom | August 09, 2006 at 12:14 PM
The media is concentrating on the relatively small stuff , correcting it and ignoring the bigger stuff.
Eureferendum has compelling evidence that the Qana dans macabre was staged with the complicity of the press--esp. AP, AFP and Reuters --and (today, the Red Cross).
This was not small potatoes. The incident was designed to further defame Israel and build international support for an immediate ceasefire which would only benefit Hezbollah.
When the media acts like a propaganda wing of Hezbollah, it deserves to be treated as that and no more.
Absent a thorough , outside credible investigation of that event, Reuters and the other persons/agencies involved along with the media which reproduced those pics without reporting on the questions raised about them, do not deserve and will not regain our respect as authentic reporters of the news.
Posted by: clarice | August 09, 2006 at 12:31 PM
The media is concentrating on the relatively small stuff , correcting it and ignoring the bigger stuff.
Eureferendum has compelling evidence that the Qana dans macabre was staged with the complicity of the press--esp. AP, AFP and Reuters --and (today, the Red Cross).
This was not small potatoes. The incident was designed to further defame Israel and build international support for an immediate ceasefire which would only benefit Hezbollah.
When the media acts like a propaganda wing of Hezbollah, it deserves to be treated as that and no more.
Absent a thorough , outside credible investigation of that event, Reuters and the other persons/agencies involved along with the media which reproduced those pics without reporting on the questions raised about them, do not deserve and will not regain our respect as authentic reporters of the news.
Posted by: clarice | August 09, 2006 at 12:32 PM
""Watch me pull a rabbit outta my hat.
Nothin' up my sleeve.............
Better get another hat."
Misdirection may be the only tactic left.
So, use it well."
another incoherent rant... why don't you go play with sam!
Posted by: Bob | August 09, 2006 at 12:33 PM
Notice that the 'fallen' man is wrapped in a rope cat's cradle that could not be made without the man's active cooperation. The photo looks like something you'd see in some of the more esoteric parts of the internet.
Posted by: Albert Schwartz | August 09, 2006 at 12:39 PM
The really odd thing is, where there are actual corpses, photographers haven't been at all shy in snapping photos. Even when the gruesomeness quotient is extraordinary. My conclusion: this particular photographer couldn't get near a real corpse, so he rented a stand-in.
Posted by: Slartibartfast | August 09, 2006 at 12:44 PM
Ahh... What you need is a nice, motivational poster.
Posted by: Robb Allen | August 09, 2006 at 12:45 PM
Green helmet is now appearing in a white helmet, sometimes no helmet and a face mask.
He knows that we know.
Posted by: SunnyDay | August 09, 2006 at 12:46 PM
Robb--Brilliant..
Posted by: clarice | August 09, 2006 at 01:20 PM
One earns a level of respect according to how one treats others. Fauxtography and staging show a lack of respect the equal of wanton spraying of Katyusha rockets into civilian populations.
Unfortunately, the publishers and CEOs of mainstream agencies/TV/press neither understand nor appreciate how much fauxtography and Katyushas undermine the minimum requirements of society good enough to allow journalism the luxury to serve.
Were they interested in journalism, they would examine, through their reporting, what threatens society and why. They lack the wit to know.
Posted by: sbw | August 09, 2006 at 01:33 PM
This doesn't really surprise me. That the left views perception as more important than reality is nothing new.
Posted by: Arkanssouri John | August 09, 2006 at 02:04 PM
The "correction" is bogus!
How is it that the "injured man" is holding his cap against his side. If he fell, wouldn't he have lost his cap, doesn't care about his cap, hurts too much to worry about his cap....?
Posted by: John | August 09, 2006 at 02:59 PM
Zombie has a nice explanation of four distinct kinds of fauxtography. A rather obvious point of it is that those who defend the fauxtographers have a tool there. In each individual case, the fauxtographers are usually practicing just one form of deception and are innocent of the other three. So an outraged, rambling, ad hominem defense where the defender proves the fauxtog innocent on the three counts which he was never accused of kicks up enough confusion to succeed.
cathy :-)
Posted by: cathyf | August 09, 2006 at 02:59 PM
The commenters on the fauxtographs at Gatewaypundit who defend them consider them to be fake but accurrate.
The fauxtographer in this case is NYT's Tyler Hicks, not a stringer. The sequence of shots on Gatewaypundit show that Hicks was present when the "dead guy" was walking around. The original caption saying that one man was helping another who had fallen and was hurt is very unconvincing. The photo looks quite staged. If the "hurt" man was unconscious, as suggested by the closed eyes, then how is he clutching his hat to his side with his left arm? If he is unconscious, why is the other man pulling him up in that manner?
If he is not unconscious, why is he pressing his left arm to his side to hold onto his hat instead of helping to pull himself up?
Gateway commenters point out a lot of other inconsistensies. I don't think the NYT has done nearly enough to explain what was going on here, and it smells a little rotten concerning their "celebrated" Tyler Hicks.
Posted by: JohnH | August 09, 2006 at 03:15 PM
I think I found some more Fauxtography?
Posted by: Rocco | August 09, 2006 at 06:10 PM
"...one man helped another who had fallen and was hurt."
This is a preposterous "correction."
As the sixth photo in a photo essay, a picture of a man who has fallen down provides no context or color, in reporting on the aftermath of a bombing. In other words, as the caption is corrected, the photo has no news value.
Alternatively, an apparently dead body does provide context and color to the story.
Fake, but accurate is not the way to run a news gathering organization, but then again, they all seem to be in the opinion journalism business.
Posted by: Forbes | August 09, 2006 at 06:32 PM
MSM,falling into the old trap,it isn't the crime it's the coverup,further and further into the quagmire they ride.
Incidentally,how many people would handle the bodies of these poor little mites in such a callous fashion as do these child molesters?
Did none of the fauxtographers flinch at such cold blooded man handling of dead children,could not of them stop clicking even to be sick,could none of them walk away in disgust,rather than be part of such a tableaux macabre?
Shameful,truly shameful!
Posted by: PeterUK | August 09, 2006 at 06:45 PM
At least someone has noticed
Posted by: PeterUK | August 09, 2006 at 06:50 PM
How is it that the "injured man" is holding his cap against his side. If he fell, wouldn't he have lost his cap, doesn't care about his cap, hurts too much to worry about his cap....?
As far as I am concerned, this sums up the entire fakery. But there is always a reason for their madness. They support terrorists and all things anti-American.
It would be very interesting if someone viewed all their published war photos and rated them pro/con American. Of course, the frequency they published Abu Ghraib would sink them immediately.
Their correction explanation has to be a deliberate bald-faced lie because of that hat. I don't care about the photographer....I want someone to nail them on the correction LIE.
Posted by: owl | August 09, 2006 at 07:00 PM
Here is one they probaly wished they had faked
Posted by: PeterUK | August 09, 2006 at 07:07 PM
PeterUK:
Per the "Corner article..."just making things up" why am I not surprised? They are in the propaganda business.
Posted by: maryrose | August 09, 2006 at 07:27 PM
Maryrose,
The Middles East has had a tradition of begging for millennia,children are deliberately maimed to enhance their prospects of elicting pity and so receive more alms.There are bands,almost circus troupes of people who beg,rob and fake accidents for money.
Most in the west are ignorant of this,and indeed regard the idea as preposterous,but if we think car accident scams,where someone will deliberately collide with a vehicle,it is not so far fetched.
It is not then,very far to fake deaths,in fact there is an incentive,since the paying of compensation is traditional.
Posted by: PeterUK | August 09, 2006 at 07:49 PM
"deliberately maimed to enhance their prospects of elicting pity and so receive more alms."
And I hear they eat their young.
That's the double-edged sword of insular
blogs where the spiritually crippled find
enablers who don't call them on their
racist mindset. It is a safe haven for
the low-lifes. You know, semi-erect bipeds
whose scrotums fairly scrape
the ground they travel.
Posted by: Semanticleo | August 09, 2006 at 08:18 PM
Leotard,Right on cue,show them your scars dear,they seem a kindly bunch.
Posted by: PeterUK | August 09, 2006 at 08:31 PM
That's the double-edged sword of insular blogs where the spiritually crippled find enablers who don't call them on their racist mindset.
Racist mindset? Except he happens to be right:
Posted by: Cecil Turner | August 09, 2006 at 08:34 PM
Sad but true Cecil.
Posted by: PeterUK | August 09, 2006 at 08:42 PM
Yeah, that link's better. (I just picked the Indian one because it made headlines last week.) Cheers.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | August 09, 2006 at 08:49 PM
Cecil;
You and PUK ARE right!. Attention, all brown skinned people. We are aware of your
heinous and barbaric gene pool and demand that you report to the official ovens immediately.
You are, enmasse, condemned to suffer the
penalties commensurate with your callous disregard for your own helpless children.
Muslims, in particular, should remember there are no innocent victims amongst your
people when it comes to the WoT. You are considered terrorists until proven otherwise. Sorry, this is the new american way.
Posted by: Semanticleo | August 09, 2006 at 08:50 PM
"We are aware of your
heinous and barbaric gene pool and demand that you report to the official ovens immediately."
You been listening to your Master,Ahmadinejad again,Leotard? You have certainly got the rhetoric off pat....can you do "Green Aura"?
Posted by: PeterUK | August 09, 2006 at 08:56 PM
I quit posting on my own board and came here to get away from the DU/KOS drivel. arrrrrrrrrrrrrgh!!
Posted by: SunnyDay | August 09, 2006 at 08:59 PM
Wait. I'm brown skinned. Am I counted in your group Sem?
Posted by: Robb Allen | August 09, 2006 at 09:00 PM
Green aura can't help you, Grim Reaper.
Posted by: Semanticleo | August 09, 2006 at 09:00 PM
I thought the doctored photos was the norm for MSM for ah, so many years.
Speaking about a doctored scam or the truth...who knows...but whaddya thunk?
The Biggest Scam or ????
Posted by: lurker | August 09, 2006 at 09:05 PM
Sunny Day,
Somebody,IIRC on Jeff Goldstein,said that Sematicleo was DoubleStandard.
Posted by: PeterUK | August 09, 2006 at 09:05 PM
Now this looks like an obvious fake.
Posted by: Neo | August 09, 2006 at 09:06 PM
Aha!
Posted by: SunnyDay | August 09, 2006 at 09:07 PM
"Green aura can't help you, Grim Reaper."
"Memento Mori" Leotard,or in your case "Memento Moron".
Posted by: PeterUK | August 09, 2006 at 09:14 PM
The Biggest Scam or ????
***********
The Illuminati!! sshhhhhhh!!
Posted by: SunnyDay | August 09, 2006 at 09:16 PM
"And thus I clothe my naked villainy/With old odd ends, stol'n forth of holy writ;/And seem a saint, when most I play the devil"
Richard III
Posted by: Semanticleo | August 09, 2006 at 09:53 PM
Be ready for this.
SunnyDay! ROFL!!
Lebanon Trauma
Posted by: lurker | August 09, 2006 at 10:00 PM
Very Doublestandard,Leotard,haven't you got anything original? In Persian perhaps?
Posted by: PeterUK | August 10, 2006 at 10:11 AM
PUK;
I could write something in brownface, if that would appeal to your racial instincts.
Posted by: Semanticleo | August 10, 2006 at 10:27 AM
and the Persian language is farsi. Idiot.
Posted by: Semanticleo | August 10, 2006 at 10:28 AM
"Brown face" Leotard,your stuff is so embarrassing it should be "Red face".
Of course it is Farsi,Leotard,as I have mentioned to you many times and oft,remember? You need a new Farsi to Gibberish dictioary.
In your previos incarnation as DoubleStandard,you claimed to be an Iranian female,care to expand on that?
Posted by: PeterUK | August 10, 2006 at 12:01 PM
PUK;
Why are you languishing on this thread?
You should be whipping up the local townspeople so you have help lynching some
brown people, any brown people. That's what you are best at.
Posted by: Semanticleo | August 10, 2006 at 02:21 PM
Leotard,
You seem to be the one obsessed with brown people,I have no problem at all with brown people,it is simply people who are trying to kill me that I have a problem with.
So you do not deny you are the Iranian female DoubleStandard?
Posted by: PeterUK | August 10, 2006 at 02:50 PM
Semanticleo's taken kind of a rough turn, no?
Oh, and "Persian" is a perfectly acceptable term for "Any of the western Iranian dialects or languages of ancient or medieval Persia and modern Iran," or so says my dictionary.
Something bothering you lately, 'cleo? I mean the naked accusations of racism are lacking even in the rudimentary elements of style I'd become accustomed to seeing from you.
Posted by: DrSteve | August 10, 2006 at 03:47 PM
Dr.Steve;
Another pseudonym for Takla Makan, or Dicentrist or whatever handle you choose to disguise, rather than distinguish yourself with?
This time don't hit-and-run with your usual
nonsequitur. Try entering the debate for a change.
Posted by: Semanticleo | August 10, 2006 at 06:22 PM
"Try entering the debate for a change." you should try it yourself DoubleStandard.
Posted by: PeterUK | August 10, 2006 at 07:35 PM
PUK;
You really are delusional with your insipid insistence I must be 'doublestandard', aren't you?
First off, I am your antithesis, and the first bullet on the list of differences is that I do not skulk, or lie, or hide behind false and numerous pseudonyms.
Second on the list; I am not a closeted,
self-deluded racist swine whose gonads
wither casusing my speech inflections to
crawl to a whispered croak a few octaves higher than the common ferret.
I could go on, but what's the point? You
are a victim of end-stage soulrot, leaving you with little more than a meatsuit to inhabit until the day your carcass becomes food for maggots and nightcrawlers.
Posted by: Semanticleo | August 10, 2006 at 07:44 PM
Semanticleo is your real name? You poor sad bastard.
Your future
Posted by: PeterUK | August 10, 2006 at 08:24 PM
And you are;
1. Vittorio Serafino?
2. Tommaso Pompeii?
3. Mary Turner?
Or do you have any connection to Tiscali
at all? When you steal handles and, doubleclick takes one to Yahoo, do you
think you are fooling anyone, Idiot times ten?
Posted by: Semanticleo | August 10, 2006 at 09:02 PM
Are you unutterably bone stupid, take your pick
Posted by: PeterUK | August 10, 2006 at 09:13 PM
Jaysus on a pony, project much?
'cleo, I only post as DrSteve; I've done so for years now. I've never posted anywhere as anything else. If you have a problem with multiple personalities on the Internet, take it up with the otherwise wholly uninteresting Mr. Greenwald.
Posted by: DrSteve | August 11, 2006 at 01:14 AM
DSteve,
Sematicleo is spending too much time involved in this kind of thing
Posted by: PeterUK | August 11, 2006 at 05:46 AM
DrSteve;
Instead of lurking and trolling the comments
opportunistically, try making a comment that
bares your opinions, attitudes and beliefs instead of sniping at the perceived underdog.
Posted by: Semanticleo | August 11, 2006 at 11:34 AM
'cleo, you're about as correct about my posting behavior as you are my identity. Try making a comment or two that isn't completely full of shit and see how I react then. 'k?
Posted by: DrSteve | August 13, 2006 at 09:30 PM
Oh wow! Looky what I missed. drama!!
Posted by: SunnyDay | August 13, 2006 at 09:46 PM
Good evening. Working hard, in this busy time for you called. This is my friend and the Boke,just established, the time is not long. The issue here isthat everybody can see my Boke, Ha-ha, raising some visibility, which caused trouble to ask your forgiveness! We all hope to see. Please! 如烟往事博客 记忆深处博客 漠北孤烟博客 天涯无悔博客 月光城市博客 寂寞如烟博客 三国演义博客 江南记忆博客 青海日光博客 月复西斜博客 马帮茶道 雨天下雨博客 秋日私语博客 苍凉世界博客 把酒问天博客 逍遥过客 铿锵玫瑰 寂寞雨夜 乡下孩子博客 天上人间博客 我心飞翔 尘封往事博客 岁月如歌博客 庐山之恋 三间茅屋博客 wanqiudaocao
Posted by: fsdhwi0 | August 16, 2006 at 12:28 AM