Powered by TypePad

« I'll Start By Calling 'Bullshit' On This | Main | Whither The NSA Warrantless Surveillance? »

December 02, 2006

Comments

topsecretk9

...The government does not intend to introduce these articles for the truth of the matters asserted, id. at 1, but rather, only for the limited purpose of demonstrating that the defendant had a motive to make the statements to the media representatives that form the basis for the charged offenses.

--only for the limited purpose of demonstrating that the defendant had a motive--

I do believe this conflicts with the SP's timeline on Judith Miller...for the motive would have to occur after July 6th., and Libby did not talk to Novak and he only confirmed what Cooper suggested to him - according to Cooper.

Anyways..my point still stands. How does Fitz prove that ambiguous and anti-septic questions scribbled on a news article mean a "double-super secret" code to retaliate if he does not call Cheny?

My guess, is Fitz put that in there to bait the defense into calling Cheney...my guess is the defense knows this and will not call Cheney.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Wilson/Plame