The NY Times front pages (above the fold!) a story that can be easily read as an Obama-basher or, for those so inclined, an Obama-booster, yet the blogosphere has scarcely registered a response, if Memeorandum and Technorati can be my guides. Weird.
Let me race through the Barack-bashing version of his spiritual development - he was raised by non-practicing Methodist/Baptist grandparents, a non-practicing Muslim father, and a cultural anthropologist mother who exposed the kids to a number of religions for the "the inspirational power of the common narratives and heroes."
However, as a community organizer in Chicago, Obama was inspired by a racist, inflammatory minister who preaches "black liberation theology" and warns his congregation "against 'middleclassness', its term for selfish individualism". By the way, in context seems to mean white middleclassedness.
About this inspirational minister, Mr. Wright - in 1984 he traveled "to Libya to visit Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, along with the Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. Mr. Wright said his visits implied no endorsement of their views."
And Obama, who met Mr. Wright in the late 80's, took his message to heart:
Services at Trinity were a weekly master class in how to move an audience. When Mr. Obama arrived at Harvard Law School later that year, where he fortified himself with recordings of Mr. Wright’s sermons, he was delivering stirring speeches as a student leader in the classic oratorical style of the black church.
Whoa - if this were written about a Republican, the secular libs would be rending their garments or laughing out loud.
Whatever. Here is the careful separation of church and state:
As a presidential candidate, Mr. Obama is reaching out to both liberal skeptics and committed Christians. In many speeches or discussions, he never mentions religion. When Mr. Obama, a former constitutional law professor, does speak of faith, he tends to add a footnote about keeping church and state separate.
But he also talks of building a consensus among secular liberal and conservative Christian voters. Mr. Wallis, the antipoverty advocate who calls himself a “progressive evangelical,” first met Mr. Obama 10 years ago when both participated in traveling seminars on American civic life. On bus rides, Mr. Wallis and Mr. Obama would huddle, away from company like George Stephanopoulos and Ralph Reed, to plot building a coalition of progressive and religious voters.
“The problems of poverty and racism, the uninsured and the unemployed, are not simply technical problems in search of the perfect 10 point plan,” Mr. Obama says in one of his standard campaign lines. “They are rooted in both societal indifference and individual callousness — in the imperfections of man.”
Ahh! If a Democratic politician has a view on abortion informed by his religion, that is out of bounds. But if his view on tax policy, welfare, health care, social services, or the environment is shaped by his religious values, its all good. I sort of see why lefties are ducking this article.
In any case, the Times advises us that the minister is prepared to be tossed under the bus:
Few of those at Mr. Wright’s tribute in March knew of the pressures that Mr. Obama’s presidential run was placing on the relationship between the pastor and his star congregant. Mr. Wright’s assertions of widespread white racism and his scorching remarks about American government have drawn criticism, and prompted the senator to cancel [Mr, Wright's] delivery of the invocation when he formally announced his candidacy in February.
...
Mr. Wright, who has long prided himself on criticizing the establishment, said he knew that he may not play well in Mr. Obama’s audition for the ultimate establishment job.
“If Barack gets past the primary, he might have to publicly distance himself from me,” Mr. Wright said with a shrug. “I said it to Barack personally, and he said yeah, that might have to happen.”
How will Barack distance himself from his minister of twenty years? What should we expect, a Minister Souljah moment? Mr. Wright, you're wrong?
Quite a Times story, although no one seems to think so.
MORE: Some background on Obama's church and "middleclassedness" in this Freeper post.
When you have to run away from your past associations to remake yourself{take note David Brock} it means your old beliefs are in conflict with your new goals and aspirations. Wanting new power is a great way to rationalize all behavior and causes you to reject your basic roots and beliefs.
My faith is the cornerstone of my life. It is not something I could jettison in order to pursue ultimate power.
Posted by: maryrose | April 30, 2007 at 07:56 PM
maryrose:
it means your old beliefs are in conflict with your new goals and aspirations.
See this Chicago Tribune article:
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | April 30, 2007 at 08:18 PM
Abandoning one's minister isn't quite the same as abandoning one's faith.
And yet -- there must have been something that attracted him for all of those years donchathink?
Posted by: vnjagvet | April 30, 2007 at 08:32 PM
H&R:
That example of Obama's behavior alone would be reason enough for me to never vote for him. It reminds me of Al Gore and his minions rejecting absentee ballots from the military overseas in 2000 during the recount fiasco. When I look back at that nightmare I can't believe how many times they recounted those ballots and for that I will never vote for sore loser Gore. I actually liked Lieberman.
Posted by: maryrose | April 30, 2007 at 08:39 PM
vnjaqvet:
Now Wright's teachings and beliefs are an embarassment to Obama and could cause him votes so he is willing to throw him under the bus. It's like Hillary's old mentor that taught her about wealth distribution. Someone should resurrect him during the campaign. His ideas are definitely not mainstream.
Posted by: maryrose | April 30, 2007 at 08:42 PM
Let's see.....
Imus was wrong and should have been fired, but rap music is Tom Maguire's fault; if 32 college kids are murdered Obama wants to talk about verbal violence; giving to charity once you think you're gonna run for president; dumping your minister in your run for president; start your career in politics by bare-knuckling another progressive out by challenging the signatures on their nominating petitions in court.
Obama is a serial cynicalizer.
Of course, none of this is really unique to Obama. And that's the point, there really isn't anything substantively unique about Obama. He's an ambitious politician.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | April 30, 2007 at 08:52 PM
H&R:
You make Obama as an ambitios politician sound a lot like Hilary-oh right-they are cut from the same cloth...
Posted by: maryrose | April 30, 2007 at 08:55 PM
I can't believe he taught con law. When did he find the time.
Posted by: Jane | April 30, 2007 at 09:06 PM
Why does the phrase "chicken-eatin' preacher" come to mind?
Posted by: richard mcenroe | April 30, 2007 at 09:11 PM
Of course, you want to play cynical politics, you take this WaPo article and keep shoving it down the nutroots throats.....
Not only does the article claim Obama to be an interventionist.........the author is...
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | April 30, 2007 at 09:12 PM
I wonder how Pastor Wright would feel about Obama and the slumlord patron...
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | April 30, 2007 at 09:37 PM
I am not "shocked" in the Inspector Renault sense at this behavior from an ambitious politician.
Nor do I think that cynicism, ambition, or ruthlessness is a disqualifying quality in a candidate for presidential leadership in a time of war.
Posted by: vnjagvet | April 30, 2007 at 09:38 PM
vnjagvet:
Nor do I think that cynicism, ambition, or ruthlessness is a disqualifying quality in a candidate for presidential leadership in a time of war.
Nor do I, per se. But you have to be able to have a sense whether the person is authentic. Are they pandering? Are they operating on principles to which they will adhere after elected, when polls shift, when events overtake plans, when backers come to collect on their investment, etc...
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | April 30, 2007 at 09:54 PM
You are right about that, H&R.
Posted by: vnjagvet | April 30, 2007 at 11:12 PM
O/T on Corzine:
The motorcade did not use emergency lights, as it had been just before the accident.
The governor’s motorcade moved with the flow of traffic on Interstate 295, at some points sustaining speeds up to 70 miles per hour several minutes at a time, according to the speedometer of a vehicle traveling alongside; posted limits were 55 and 65. Capt. Al Della Fave, a state police spokesman, said the commander of the executive protection unit, which provides security and drivers for the governor, told him on Monday that the troopers in the motorcade had been instructed to adhere to posted speed limits.
----
I hope he gets well soon. But I also hope his driver gets a speeding ticket, as a normal citizen might.
Posted by: Maybeex | May 01, 2007 at 04:11 AM
Iraqi news reporting that al Massuri head of al qaeda in Iraq is dead.
Posted by: Jane | May 01, 2007 at 06:28 AM
It was prophetic...
From instapundit:
FIGHTING GLOBAL WARMING WITH PLANKTON:
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 01, 2007 at 09:11 AM
that's pretty frightening, h&r.
Can you make a joke about me winning the lottery? Or about losing 5 lbs before bathing suit season?????
Posted by: Maybeex | May 01, 2007 at 09:26 AM
Maybee:
Can you make a joke about me winning the lottery?
Depends. If you win the lottery, will you tithe a portion of your winnings to the Church of the Carbon Consumption Cessasionists to Stop Catastrophic Climate Change? (CCCCSCCC, for short)
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 01, 2007 at 10:03 AM
So would that plankton thing make the ocean explode?
Posted by: Jane | May 01, 2007 at 10:40 AM
From the article:
From the church website:
AND
Different contexts to be sure, but, a small heh.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 01, 2007 at 10:45 AM
Given Obama's connections with crooked developers, I don't see why he doesn't team up with Hari al-Reid and Dianne Feinstein.
It would be an awesome team of crooks.
A bit problematic at the moment, perhaps. If Melanie Sloan at CREW takes note of the stink coming off a rotten Democrat (as she does with Feinstein) then the Dem is ready to be taken to the dump.
Will Sloan ever comment on the odor coming off of Hari? Not while he's a "leader".
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 01, 2007 at 11:47 AM
Melanie works for the Clintonites and Schumer..Feinstein is out of her sphere of protection.
Posted by: clarice | May 01, 2007 at 11:58 AM
I LOVE Australia and in particular John Howard for his stance on the war and his support of the US.
But this doesn't sit well with me at all.
What's next? Aussie Rules Football becomes Aussie Rules Touch Football?
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 01, 2007 at 12:01 PM
H & R--don't even go there..........
Posted by: clarice | May 01, 2007 at 12:17 PM
Well, Rick, I was about to mention Melanie's appearance in that Hill piece.
Even though...
...ah crap, I can't get to the CREW site....so, this becomes...
BOLD PREDICTION: Feinstein's conflict of interest is not prominently displayed on the CREW homepage......
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 01, 2007 at 12:25 PM
because of the amount of money involved, Feinstein’s conflict of interest is an order of magnitude greater than those conflicts
Translation: Because of the magnitude of the money involved I'd be admitting what a Dem hack I am if I didn't comment - but comment is all I will do.
Feinstein prolly funds Crew in some fashion as well.
Posted by: topsecretk9 | May 01, 2007 at 12:39 PM
Clarice:
don't even go there..........
Well, I may be upset with them, but I certainly am not planning to boycott Australia by not traveling there.
On second thought, maybe I will. Protest the watering down of their beer AND limit my carbon emissions.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 01, 2007 at 12:46 PM
I Blame Bush!
Who's next? Canada? 3.2 Beer and touch hockey?
Posted by: Lew Clark | May 01, 2007 at 01:09 PM
Tops,
The "order of magnitude" comment actually obscures the real order of magnitude involved. The problem on this one is that the explanation of what actually occured would lead to MEGO in about 100 words. The short version is that the '96 Blum/Salibas investment in Perini was so far underwater by '99 that they were able (forced?) to take control in '00. With a little help from Dear Diane the situation was so "improved" by '05 that Blum was able to cash in. I don't think the $1.5B in Milcon contracts was the most important aspect at all. The real dough was in change orders on the Big Dig - if that manure pile was uncovered you'd find Kerry/Kennedy holding hands with Feinstein at the bottom.
Anyone can easily trace the investment aspect by reading the 8K/10K info on Perini. Well, anyone with a mania for minutiae.
The devil is in the details - this wasn't a 'passive' investment.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 01, 2007 at 01:20 PM
CREW homepage...
No mention of the congressperson with the conflict of interest that is an order of magnitude greater than the others......
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 01, 2007 at 01:21 PM
Well, H & R it is pretty obvious the remark was just for the record in case IRS ever gets off its hind end to look into CREW's tax exemption. Maybe this is worthy of another Jeff Dobbs *expose*..
Posted by: clarice | May 01, 2007 at 01:37 PM
Lew:
I Blame Bush!
Who's next? Canada? 3.2 Beer and touch hockey?
Hmmmm, thinking of a new approach.
I Blame Obama.
Not sure if I'm ready for the switch yet. But it's under consideration.
As to Canadian beer, ya know, last Friday I wanted to pick up some Molson Canadian but the local store didn't have it.
I Blame Obama.
(yeah, still not sure)
I Blame Bush.
(yeah, see, that's crisp, clean and refreshing, taste's great and less filling)
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 01, 2007 at 01:38 PM
Tradesports has opened the betting on me doing a CREW piece at 6.
I don't want to violate rules against insider trading, so it would be wrong for me to say what I really think and advise anyone not to buy any contracts....
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 01, 2007 at 01:47 PM
Rick,
I'm interested in that Perini information. Where are you getting it?
Posted by: Jane | May 01, 2007 at 01:55 PM
Jane,
Here is where I started. I forgot to list the 13-Ds, which provide the ownership info. This is an example of what I was talking about. I also used 'Saliba' when I should have used 'Tutor'. Ron Tutor was Blum's main partner in Perini.
It may be easier to follow using the EDGAR archival search engine.
Fun with exercise rights for convertible preferreds. It really keeps one on the edge of the chair.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 01, 2007 at 02:37 PM
Jane,
This one is entertaining:
Lookee, ma, see how purdy and clean my hands are!
I also got a kick out of "Union Labor Life Insurance Company Separate Account P ("Account P")" being used as the source of funds. Jes' one big happy family - kinda like Ma Barker and her boys.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 01, 2007 at 03:26 PM
Move over Penelope and Paz...
Maria Conchita Alonso kicks ass.
And of course, this sealed the deal...
If you click through and read, you'll notice in that last sentence I put in the ellipse to remove one thing with which I would disagree. But I'm letting it slide because the counting peanuts quip blinds me to any faults she may possess.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 01, 2007 at 04:09 PM
So Pelosi finally signed the bill and Bush is going to veto it shortly.
Reid was really stupid to made comments that it's Bush's fault for holding up the money.
Posted by: lurker9876 | May 01, 2007 at 05:15 PM
"A woman came home, screeching her car into the driveway, and ran into the house. She slammed the door and shouted at the top of her lungs, "Honey, pack your bags. I won the lottery!"
The husband said, "Oh my God! What should I pack, beach stuff or mountain stuff?" "Doesn't matter," she said. "Just get out."
Posted by: PeterUK. | May 01, 2007 at 05:28 PM
Clarice...I trust you've seen the insty link about the court decision on the Democrat's invasion of privacy- illegal phone tapping (you know the party so concerned with privacy and legalities)....anyways from the link
thought I would point out to you...Tatel.
Posted by: topsecretk9 | May 01, 2007 at 05:39 PM
PUK.........
TS I saw and blogged it..I'm still waiting for that Ct to rule on the Dow Jones suit to release the still redacted portions of the Miller case and Fitz affidavit in that case.
Posted by: clarice | May 01, 2007 at 05:46 PM
"The truth of Jefferson’s letter"
The Atiku Abubakar Campaign Organisation, Thursday, released yet another press statement which read in part:
In his letter to the Senate, Tuesday, on the alleged use of PTDF funds in TIB to advance the political interest of Vice President Atiku Abubakar, President Obasanjo claimed to have been alerted by U.S. Congressman William Jefferson.
The letter also claimed that the deposit was accessed by Otunba Oyewole Fasawe who used it in the pursuit of his business interests.The Atiku Abubakar Campaign will like to state that the President’s account regarding the sequence of events in this matter is typically, false. The facts of the matter are these:
Otunba Oyewole Fasawe was invited by a senior official of his bank, Trans International Bank, TIB to meet certain investors at the 2003 Sullivan Economic Summit in Abuja who were seeking a Nigerian collaborator to bring a new American communication technology to Nigeria.
Otunba Fasawe was, thereafter, introduced to US Congressman, William Jefferson who promised to facilitate the introduction of the American telecommunication technology to Nigeria. On the strength of assurances by the Congressman who was Chairman of the American house sub_committee on Nigeria, Fasawe applied for a loan facility from TIB, whose official alerted him of the investment opportunity.
Otunba Fasawe, thereafter, transferred $6.7 million to iGate, the company introduced by Congressman Jefferson by January 2003. After waiting endlessly and Jefferson was not forthcoming with the equipment as promised, Otunba Fasawe sought the help of his friend, President Obasanjo to use his contact with the American government to get Jefferson to return his money.This is in addition to the persistent pressure on Jefferson and officials of iGate.
Jefferson’s letter dated 9th June 2004 was written six months after Fasawe had persistently put him (Jefferson) under tremendous pressure to refund his money or face legal action.
This also puts to question the claim that the President’s inquisition was prompted by the Congressman’s complaint and that the letter was the first time he knew about the matter.
The truth is that Jefferson’s letter was prompted by the petition of Otunba Fasawe to President Obasanjo and President Bush of America.
Jefferson could not validly complain of the source of the NDTV funds after keeping the money for six months. The letter from Jefferson was, therefore, a blackmail to escape the imminent legal action by Fasawe who had become restless over his (now apparently) bad investment.
It is noteworthy that President Obasanjo received the letter from Jefferson in June 2004 but did not deem it fit to cause EFCC to investigate the allegations until after the defeat of the third term agenda in May 2006, more than two years after.
It is also important to note that Congressman Jefferson whose integrity President Obasanjo believes to the point of engendering a national crisis has the following profile:
He (Jefferson) is under investigation in the U.S. for collecting bribes to discharge his official responsibilities.
Jefferson, who collected $6.5 million from Otunba Fasawe to promote the new American telecommunication technology in Nigeria took Lori Mody, promoter of iGate to Vice President Abubakar, to upstage Otunba Fasawe from the business. If Atiku was part of the NDTV plot, will Jefferson be so stupid to solicit his help to upstage his own (Atiku’s) company?
Jefferson collected $100,000 from Lori Mody and told her that he had passed same to Vice President Abubakar but the money was later found wrapped in a foil paper and hidden in his freezer.
It is curious that Mr. President who is privy to these facts will attach any weight to the claims of Jefferson and desecrate the National Assembly by sending the blackmail paper to it.
Garba Shehu
Atiku Abubakar Presidential Campaign Organisation,
Jabi, Abuja
September 14, 2006.
Posted by: Rocco | May 01, 2007 at 06:25 PM
Otunba Fasawe, thereafter, transferred $6.7 million to iGate, the company introduced by Congressman Jefferson by January 2003. After waiting endlessly and Jefferson was not forthcoming with the equipment as promised, Otunba Fasawe sought the help of his friend, President Obasanjo to use his contact with the American government to get Jefferson to return his money.This is in addition to the persistent pressure on Jefferson and officials of iGate.
Jefferson’s letter dated 9th June 2004 was written six months after Fasawe had persistently put him (Jefferson) under tremendous pressure to refund his money or face legal action.
This also puts to question the claim that the President’s inquisition was prompted by the Congressman’s complaint and that the letter was the first time he knew about the matter.
The truth is that Jefferson’s letter was prompted by the petition of Otunba Fasawe to President Obasanjo and President Bush of America.
Sounds like Jefferson was defrauding everyone - Mody, Nigeria and Vernon Jackson of Igate - there was a report that said that Jefferson was planning on pushing Vernon out as head of IGate...what a crumbball.
Posted by: topsecretk9 | May 01, 2007 at 06:47 PM
Tops,
It just shows the difference between a Democratic Representative and a Democratic Senator. If Reid or Feinstein or Obama or Kennedy or Kerry had given Cold Cash a hand, the theft would have been much harder to detect.
The Democratic Senate Leadership Conference should offer graft lessons for Democratic Representatives so that this sort of exposure of petty grifting doesn't sully the party's reputation for reasonably quiet extraction.
There are (well, were) 15 or so Republican Reps that could have used similiar help on the Abramoff deal. There don't seem to be many Republican grifters left to teach.
Plenty of Dems though.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 01, 2007 at 07:02 PM
Rick,
I haven't got it in me to read all that stuff. I'm interested because I know Perini, sort of. I used to be quite involved in a charity that he is very involved with. And I know a lot of people who know him very very very well. So I was wondering if I could capitalize on any of that to get some inside info.
Posted by: Jane | May 01, 2007 at 07:28 PM
Hit and Run,
Hmmmm, thinking of a new approach.
I Blame Obama.
Why not, to use the Senator's words, "the imperfections of man?" This approach could save us from the pesky time space problems we encounter in trying to inculpate the 43rd President for the first World War, the Crusades, and, not least, the film Citizen Kane.
You will note, however, that I am not prepared to absolve George W. Bush of responsibility for your inability to obtain a certain alcoholic product from your local retailer. Though I would not swear it under penalty of perjury, I believe that Molson Canadian is not sold in the United States. If such a state of affairs does not demand a Special Counsel, I am not sure what does.
Posted by: Elliott | May 01, 2007 at 07:29 PM
We used to drink Molson Canadian in Colorado all the time...but this was the first time I've looked for it here. Maybe it was a precursor to the Molson Coors merger? Or maybe the inability to get it in the states is a result of the merger? I have no idea.
I blame Original Sin.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 01, 2007 at 07:40 PM
Jane,
I didn't see anything that reflects upon the Perini family in what I've read. Construction companies tend to become sclerotic over time and it really looks as if the family recognized that value wasn't being added (or maintained) and unloaded at a reasonably propitious time.
The stock was trading in the $7-8 range when Blum/Tutor bought in '96 and had tanked to less than $3 by mid '00 when the conversion option was exercised. It was trading at $14-16 when Blum got out in '05 and it has gone as high as $43 recently.
Blum is just fortunate to have had his wife's help in bailing him out of what was (at the time in '00) a bad investment. Even then, the overall rate of return from '96-'05 was pretty pathetic.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 01, 2007 at 08:00 PM
'Maria Conchita Alonso kicks ass.'
She's also 50 years old.
Besides, since I learned to lisp my cees and zees in Barcelona (Bar-thay-lona) I love to say Poth.
Posted by: PatrickR | May 01, 2007 at 08:06 PM
She's also 50 years old.
That is in her favor. Even more crathy about her now.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 01, 2007 at 08:25 PM
Rick,
I wasn't thinking of bad stuff about the Perini's, but they sure would have the inside dope on Feinstien's help. Loose lips and all that. I no longer live in that area and it would take some reconnoitering to get at that gossip, but the next time I have a chance it might be fun.
Posted by: Jane | May 01, 2007 at 09:10 PM
I am happy to report that I appear to have been mistaken about the availability of Molson Canadian in the U.S. I blame the imperfections of me.
Posted by: Elliott | May 02, 2007 at 12:18 AM
Elliott,
Apologies are nice, but, talking h&r down from the ledge would be nice too.
Posted by: Lew Clark | May 02, 2007 at 12:28 AM
Thank you Elliott.
I Blame Canada.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 02, 2007 at 12:28 AM
Well, the ledge was only 3 ft off the ground....so, I kinda just hopped down on my own.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 02, 2007 at 12:33 AM
What none of our PC liberals will admit, is that this is the NYT's second "hit piece" on Obama's religion.
They're doing it, because they are carrying Hillary Clinton's water for her!
They've attacked Romney for being a Mormon, they've attacked Obama's religious background, and they'll do others; the whole message is that Bill & Hillary's religion is good, everyone else's is bad!
You see, the type of religion, that allows you to get orally serviced by an Intern, then get ministered to by a corrupt, extortionist "minister", who does so, while his pregnant girlfriend is by his side, is "good" religion; but everybody else's, especially President Bush's, or anyone running against Hillary, is BAD!
Don't take my comments above, as an endorsement of Obama.
He's a cogential liar, just like Hillary.
Even though it was a hit piece by the NYT, they dramatically underplayed his Islamic past.
Obama, at the very least, is a Muslim practicing TAQIYYAH!
How come no one has brought up the fact, that under Islamic law, Obama is recognized the world around, as a Muslim because his father was a Muslim.
If he suddenly found "Jesus", as he claims, he is, technically, in the eyes of all Muslims, and APOSTATE, and deserving of immediate Death!
Why don't we hear Radical Muslim pointing that out, and leading the charge?
Very curious!
Even IF he's a serious convert to Christianity, the brand of Afro-centric, Racist Christianity that he has choosen, in the mold of radical Afro-centric racists like Ivan van Sertima, Chacellor Williams and Cornel West, is not something that we want to see in the Oval Office, trust me!
It's radical, it's racist, it's Anti-White, it's Anti-American, and most basically, it's complete and utter nonsense, going clear back to Marcus Garvey!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrocentrism
Posted by: Dale in Atlanta | May 02, 2007 at 08:38 AM
OT:
H&R - I thought you might be interested in this from Hub Politics: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, April 26, 2007
Jeff Beatty Announces the "Beatty Exploratory Committee to Defeat Massachusetts Senator John Kerry
BOSTON, MA APRIL 26, 2007 -- Jeff Beatty will officially announce the creation of a Senatorial Campaign Exploratory Committee to defeat John Kerry, Thursday evening, April 26, 2007 at the Best Western Hotel, Bourne Rotary, in Bourne, Massachusetts at 6:45pm.
Beatty is a former Army Delta Force Officer and was in the first Black Hawk shot down, earning a Purple Heart while helping to rescue hundreds of Americans in Grenada. He was also a Special Agent advising the FBI National Hostage Rescue Team, and a former CIA Counter-Terrorism Officer with service in Europe and the Middle East.
Beatty currently serves our state, and country, in the private sector as founder and president of TotalSecurity.US. He predicted the Atlanta Olympic Bomb three months in advance on the TODAY program and has provided anti-terrorist training and support to the Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority, Boston Public Schools, Mass Highway, Mass Turnpike, the Pentagon, Statue of Liberty, The Super Bowl, The Rose Bowl, the Olympics and numerous other organizations nationwide.
In 2006, Beatty entered the political world and ran for Congress against 5-term incumbent, Bill Delahunt, and received more votes than any other Massachusetts challenger. Beatty exceeded expectations and showed himself to be a formidable political force.
With Polls showing support for Kerry at an all time low, please join us Thursday night in Bourne and meet the challenger who wants to be our next Senator, offering the citizens of Massachusetts the change they seek and the representation they deserve.
For more information on the Beatty Exploratory Committee, please contact Bob Parks
Posted by: Jane | May 02, 2007 at 11:13 AM
Jane -- is Beatty talking about running as a Republican? Or challenging Kerry in the primary?
Posted by: cathyf | May 02, 2007 at 11:54 AM
Godspeed Mr. Beatty. Thank you Jane, warms my heart.
The press release is a understandably ambigous on how he actually did in his congressional run....
MA-10 described as...
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 02, 2007 at 12:22 PM
Cathy,
I've never heard of him but I suspect H&R has it right (as usual) or (for a change) since Delahunt is a dem. I'd say that since all of MA is "generally Democratic territory" that's old news. What is significant about those districts is that they are for the most part wealthy. The buzz is that Kerry is ripe for being thrown off the bus - but I wouldn't underestimate the lengths he will go to, to make sure that doesn't happen. And he learned that stuff from the master (Kennedy).
Posted by: Jane | May 02, 2007 at 12:32 PM
Even the idea! that someone! would run against! Kerry! is in line with the smear tactics of a desperate Republican party. Jeff Beatty is simply out to swift boat a valiant and brave American hero.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 02, 2007 at 12:56 PM
I've never heard of him but I suspect H&R has it right (as usual) or (for a change) since Delahunt is a dem. I'd say that since all of MA is "generally Democratic territory" that's old news. What is significant about those districts is that they are for the most part wealthy. The buzz is that Kerry is ripe for being thrown off the bus - but I wouldn't underestimate the http://www.batteryfast.com/toshiba/satellite-m100.htm>toshiba satellite m100 battery lengths he will go to, to make sure that doesn't happen. And he learned that stuff from the master (Kennedy)
Posted by: laptop battery | October 15, 2008 at 09:49 PM
Even the idea! that someone! would run against! Kerry! is in line with the smear tactics of a desperate Republican party. Jeff Beatty is simply out to swift boat a valiant and brave American hero.
Posted by: battery | December 29, 2008 at 08:43 AM
So no matter how much I have spent to buy angels gold, I never regret.
Posted by: buy angels gold | January 07, 2009 at 02:09 AM
When you have seal cegel, you can get more!
Posted by: seal cegel | January 14, 2009 at 01:15 AM