The falcon cannot hear the falconer and conspiracists are in the saddle as we learn even more about the White House and its daffy email "system". Let's cut to Marcy Wheeler of Plame fame
I'd like to talk about what recent revelations on email deletions suggest about Karl Rove. I think that--at least with respect to the Plame investigation, the scandal is at least partly about what Rove saved, not what he deleted. I'll show you what I mean by laying out my foundation--all based on the assumption that both the CREW revelations and the Waxman revelations are true (with all responsible caveats about RNC lawyers being liars by their very nature, though if this guy was the same guy who attended the Plame hearing, he doesn't look too tricky).
After arguing plausibly that the missing Rove-Hadley email was missing from both the White House and RNC servers, we are offered this:
Which means this email must be among the 5 million emails destroyed. That tells us two things. First, as CREW described,
The OA undertook a detailed analysis of the issue, which revealed that between March 2003 and October 2005, there were hundreds of days in which emails were missing for one or more of the EOP components subject to the PRA. The OA estimated that roughly over five million email messages were missing.
If I were CREW, I'd be FOIAing that report. But the report seems to outline how the deletions took place: someone deleted entire days for entire departments. Something like:
Command: Delete ALL OPA July 6 to July 14, inclusive
Command: Delete ALL OVP July 6 to July 14, inclusiveThat is, the CREW sources seem to suggest that if something is missing, then an entire day of emails would be missing. (Which is why it might have been important that Adam Levine's email, about with Zeidenberg interviewed him in October 2005, was sent on the same day as the Rove-Hadley email.)
If I'm right (though I'd caution that the OA report language is ambiguous), it means someone went in and deleted--at a minimum--all of Rove's emails from July 11, 2003, the day he leaked to Cooper and--potentially--a number of other people.
Go long tinfoil.
Does anyone seriously believe that the only, or even most likely, explanation is that someone specifically deleted email on certain dates? Call a special counsel! Oh, wait, we had one - Fitzgerald looked at this for two years and couldn't indict anyone for tampering with evidence. Is he even dumber than the Bushies? Please.
Here is a simple alternative notion (and I am not a techie, so I will surely get a few buzzwords wrong). My launching point is the CREW news that on "hundreds" of days in the roughly 1000 day period under review there were missing emails.
So - suppose the White House servers designated to handle the WH email have a storage capacity of 100 units. In a typical day in 2001, 60 units are required; at the end of the day these emails are moved to a back-up medium, the daily servers regain 100 units of storage, and a new day dawns.
But something changes in 2003 (the report leaked to CREW covers March 2003 to Oct 2005). Maybe people start attaching video files and pictures; maybe new technology is folded into the system, or whatever. The result is that the daily email storage requirement moves up to, say, 85, and some days spikes over 100.
A well-designed system would have some sort of method of catching this overflow, obviously. But it does not appear that we are talking about a well-designed system. So maybe on "overflow days", all late emails are lost. Or maybe late emails over-write the first emails of the day - who knows? But the point is that because of insufficient storage, emails are lost on overflow days.
A possible hint - per CREW, emails were lost on "hundreds" of days, with roughly 5 million lost in total. The evidence that CREW is fulminating rather than evaluating is that they offer no obvious context for this five million figure - is that 1% of White House emails, 5%, 25%, 50%, or what? If they know, they ought to tell us; if they don't know, they ought to find out.
*IF* it is 1% yet there are emails missing from "hundreds" of days, it is hard to believe that entire days were deleted - even if "hundreds" means "exactly 200", then 20% of all emails should be missing. (OK, let me note a caveat here - CREW mentions multiple servers, so maybe one server of many might have an entire day deleted; that might represent only 20% of that day's emails, or 4% of the total.)
So how big a number is five million? White House press spokesperson Ms. Perino was asked about that on Friday and she did not know:
Q Dana, if I could follow. We have mentioned before the group called Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. They issued this report, and they are saying their analysis shows that between March 2003-October 2005, there were hundreds of days in which emails were missing -- this being in the White House system, not the RNC -- and that this equated -- it was estimated that roughly over 5 million email messages were missing.
MS. PERINO: I don't know if that group actually has -- I don't know how they do an analysis on an internal White House system. But I did check it out, and we are in communication with the Office of Administration to see if there are days or partial days when there were emails that would have gone missing. And in terms of -- "missing" is a word that -- maybe misplaced, or not necessarily lost forever. I think there are backup tapes, there are different ways in order to go back and find emails.
And in talking with them and with the Counsel's Office, there is no indication that anyone who is working on a server or in terms of technical capability that would be able to look at a server, clean up a server, or, in terms of when we converted from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Outlook if there would have been any potential loss there, that there was any intentional loss of any document. I think that those folks take those jobs very seriously and endeavor to make sure that all of the records are preserved for the Presidential Records Act, as well as the Federal Records Act.
Q So, just to be clear, are you taking issue with their conclusions, or are you just saying --
MS. PERINO: I'm not taking issue with their conclusions at this point. We're checking into them. And, again, there's 1,700 people in the Executive Office of the President. I don't know how -- we'll try to find out how many emails a day are sent with that many people. I can assure you it's a high number. But I also will tell you that the technical folks that we've spoken to in the preliminary discussions was that if there had been an inadvertent human error or a technical problem where there were days where emails might have been misplaced, that either, one -- well, one, it wouldn't have been intentional; and, two, there are ways that we can try to gather those if need be.
Well. This seem like a easy questions but I can't answer them - how many emails "ought" to be generated and saved each day in an organization of 1,700 people? And over 1000 days, how would that figure compare to five million lost emails?
Lots of firms are required to save emails so I am hoping begging for sensible guesses from knowledgeable people.
Meanwhile, conspiracists are ascendant on the left. (The sun rose in the east.)
"the report leaked to CREW covers March 2003 to Oct 2005"
These bozos call themselvs "Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington" and they accept leaked confidential material?
Posted by: PeterUK. | April 14, 2007 at 04:27 PM
Well that's weird. the "leaked" report coincides with someone's predicament to their retirement. Wonder who they got it from, wouldn't be one of their clients would it?
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 14, 2007 at 04:31 PM
Am I allowed to post on this topic? Or will you shun me on this one too, even if I agree with you?
Posted by: sylvia | April 14, 2007 at 04:33 PM
in terms of when we converted from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Outlook if there would have been any potential loss there
Ha!
My [early] experience with Outlook was one of the scariest in my computing history. When the total of email messages hit 1000 (yes, 1000) the Outlook file started writing to itself in an endless loop and ate half my harddrive before I realized what was happening and was able to kill it.
I'm quite sure that didn't happen here because I'm also sure MS eventually fixed the bug, but I can't speak to that directly because since that day Outlook has not been even within shouting distance of my PC.
But I also doubt that switching from Lotus Notes to Outlook would cause this kind of loss over a long period of time. The time of initial conversion would be the vulnerability. However, if all the email that was lost were from the Outlook period, then the conversion itself could have messed up and left gaps, large or small, in the data that was actually converted.
Posted by: Syl | April 14, 2007 at 04:56 PM
They used PCs? I smell a conspiracy!
They used PCs? Boy, those Bushies are dumb!
You know, the singular characteristic of lefties is their laziness. If they can leap to a conclusion -- any conclusion -- to avoid actually having to think, they will.
Posted by: sbwaters | April 14, 2007 at 05:46 PM
Umm, I have techs that are better than that (WH email archiving system) running my website.
If the info is backed up in real time, it's still there. If it isn't backed up in real time, how can anyone expect not to lose some? there is redundancy on top of redundancy, if the info is important.
If it isn't - don't expect to find it and don't claim you save them all.
after 9/11, when the stock market systems failed, amex systems failed, insurance company systems failed, brokerage systems failed. You know what?? There were people in hotel rooms, working from the backed up data files. Nothing was lost. Nothing.
Posted by: SunnyDay | April 14, 2007 at 05:50 PM
The last year has helped me tease ought the subtleties of ignorance:
- Those ignorant of history.
- Those ignorant of the necessary logic to use history.
- Those ignorant of their ignorance.
- Those who fight to keep their ignorance.
For lefties to master all four is a signal accomplishment.
Posted by: sbwaters | April 14, 2007 at 05:53 PM
Doh! And I previewed... ought s/b out
Posted by: sbwaters | April 14, 2007 at 05:54 PM
I don't know why anyone is surprised. Look at the problems members here had in just registering a Typekey login. And Outlook's archival function tends to take old emails and put them somewhere no one can find easily.
Most office workers I know, government or civilian, know how to turn on their workstations and hit the send button and fill in forms for their particular job, but know nothing at all about how they system they work on works. And even if they are computer literate on their home computer, they haven't a clue how networks work.
I doubt seriously that even the most savvy tech could screw up a properly designed systerm and get away with it without leaving a trail. This is another of the juvenile nutroot ideas that has no basis in reality.
Posted by: Sara | April 14, 2007 at 06:02 PM
I asked the MoveOnBots last night when we were going to see Feinstein's DNC e-mails over her husband's appropriation contracts. They seemed annoyed.
Posted by: richard mcenroe | April 14, 2007 at 06:07 PM
Hold on! This just in! Scrap of email thought lost..recovered:"I called Dick Armitage. TOld him to leak to Novak and then keep his mouth shut about what he did so we can all pay dearly.Karl" LOL
Posted by: clarice | April 14, 2007 at 06:08 PM
At this point, I simply settle for delighting in the Moonbats' impotent frustration. I hope that somewhere, somehow, somebody in the administration actually did something wrong in this matter, and that whoever it is gets away with whatever the hell it was. That oughta rattle their cages for a while!
Posted by: Other Tom | April 14, 2007 at 06:09 PM
I think there is definitely something nefarious here.
I reproduced a portion of an email I SENT to my cousin at the WH in 2005 on an earlier thread. I found it just fine in my (outlook) archives.
YET....I found no record of his responses back to me!!!!! AAAAHHHHAAAA!!!! He must have deleted my archives of his emails to me!!!
I bet Karl Rove personally did this.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | April 14, 2007 at 06:15 PM
H&R there is actually some software that will do what you described - if their marketing statements are true. I'll see if I can find it.
Posted by: SunnyDay | April 14, 2007 at 06:26 PM
Oh, wow! What did I just say? Wheeeeeeeeee! Off to find it. :D
Posted by: SunnyDay | April 14, 2007 at 06:27 PM
it's pointofmail dot com - click on "What" in "what you get for the lowest price..."
# 17, 18, 22, 23, 27 Amazing stuff.
Posted by: SunnyDay | April 14, 2007 at 06:41 PM
If the info is backed up in real time, it's still there.
Boy, that seems obvious when you put it that way. I have some vision of people mounting tape drives and trundling them off somewhere at midnight, but I may as well be thinking about scribes and papyrus.
Anyway - 1,7000 employees generating 1 email message each for 1000 days results in 1.7 million emails; 5 million is a pretty significant fraction of that.
Or 10 emails/person/day yields 17 million emails; 100 per day yields 170 million. At that level, 5 million is a bit of a pittance.
Meaning what? And does a server store just once an email that was sent to ten different people in the White House?
I am still essentially baffled.
Am I allowed to post on this topic? Or will you shun me on this one too, even if I agree with you?
Sylvia, you know we love you, except on the Duke thing.
Posted by: Tom Maguire | April 14, 2007 at 06:42 PM
"The last year has helped me tease out the subtleties of ignorance:"
I won't argue the depth and breadth of ignorance (again, both feigned and real) displayed on the left but I don't believe that's really what's going on, nor do I consider subtlety to play any part in the charade. The last original thinker on the left, Kojeve, died some forty years ago and the derivations of his "final" analysis have been swirling around the bowl since at least ten years before that. Historicism was no fun from the beginning and its "practical" application killed more than 100 million people. It's rather fitting that it is 'dying ugly', considering that it has been a lie since inception.
All that is left is theater of the absurd with a cast of fools who are unreasonably proud of being buffoons. All they have is the losers narrative and variations on a very tired theme.
Ignorance ain't really innit - these are folks who can't produce anything of merit on their own - and they damn well know it. Ned Ludd would recognize them in a heartbeat.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | April 14, 2007 at 06:43 PM
OT< You and I had the same math teacher--LOL
[quote]Anyway - 1,7000 employees generating 1 email message each for 1000 days results in 1.7 million emails; 5 million is a pretty significant fraction of that.[/quote]
Posted by: clarice | April 14, 2007 at 06:45 PM
"Sylvia, you know we love you, except on the Duke thing."
How many frogs do you have in your pockets at the moment?
Posted by: Rick Ballard | April 14, 2007 at 06:47 PM
SunnyDay:
H&R there is actually some software that will do what you described - if their marketing statements are true. I'll see if I can find it.
I won't dispute that contention, but will readily admit (though probably not necessary) that my comment was entirely sarcastic.
I delete my inbox (and subfolders) to keep it clean -- but don't ever really do much with sent items...out of sight out of mind...so, the situation described is as innocent as can be imagined.
AND.....of course I can read all of his emails to me *in* my sent items, EXCEPT any that he sent *after* my last email to him....which, though no one may believe it...is unlikely that he sent me an email to which I did not reply.
In email exchanges....I *will* have the last word and defy anyone to challenge me on this.
[VIMH:Is that true of your JOM comments?]
Well.... You've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?
Now. Off to order pizza for dinner......
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | April 14, 2007 at 06:48 PM
If they're only counting emails sent the average is 2.9. This is low, but many of the accounts may not be actively used. They're also backups, daily, weekly, and possibly monthly. They're are other systems beside the RNCs mail-server where these emails reside: laptops, desktops, and servers. They're also log records kept at the RNC's ISP. They're running Exchange Server 2007.
Posted by: DEMO | April 14, 2007 at 06:51 PM
Tom, re copies sent to different people. Probably the information is stored, but not 10 copies of the email. the email, who sent it, when, and to whom, plus anything else they want to be able to retrieve later.
Disclaimer, I am not a techie, my degree is in English and education. I have some good ones that do work for me, though, and they explain things in between their snickers at my questions and misuse of the terminology.
A clue how well stuff is backed up - I was netring an insurance application, with money, at a workstation, when the power failed. The lights kind of almost blinked as the power switched over to generator. The computers don't blink.
I've entered information that seemed to disappear - I came to find out - after the client complained that he never got his paperwork and the money was never charged to his credit card - that the server I was on had hiccupped right that instant for some reason (I don't recall why).
I got some info from the client - name, address, dollar amount of the transaction - so the IT folks knew what to look for - two days later it was squared away - correct dates and everything. Looking at it, you would never know anything happened.
The server I was on was backing up to a mainframe - in real time.
On the other hand I've seen data transfers (like when one company buys another) that go haywire, the info is scrambled, in the case of years of records, it drops everything but the original info - gone forever - or it's scrambled until it would be unrealistic to try to unscramble it. Sloppy work. Now, it could have been done over, the original info was still on the mainframe. But they didn't do it.
Posted by: SunnyDay | April 14, 2007 at 07:00 PM
As I understand this issue , the White House system has a total audit trail and backup of all emails under laws that have been enacted to ensure that history.
The other issue is the RNC email system of only a limited number that were given laptops to separate out political party issues from government business issues.
The RNC mail system is not covered under the same legislation.
The mail losses may be perfectly justified due to no reason of requirement of law to hold backup archives as mandated by the law in other cases.
In any event even if Rove for example deleted an email off his laptop , it depends on how the mail server is configured as to weather the mail item is deleted on the server by this action. Then the mail server backups may be unique continuous backups or only a certain time frame subset until backup media is reused.
TM
Mail servers on any reasonable server will have the capacity to hold years of history before culling out. The overwrite scenario is not likely, as most software would just stop accepting new mails until capacity was freed up.
This whole issue has been addressed in the massive requirements put forth for record retention of emails / IM's / documents under Sarbanes Oxaley.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 14, 2007 at 07:00 PM
If you really loved me, you'd love me even when I didn't agree with you. But, I am willing to forgive and forget, because you have been nice all the other times.
And now off to the library.
Posted by: sylvia | April 14, 2007 at 07:02 PM
Sylvia
Say hi to Katie Couric for us won't ya.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 14, 2007 at 07:05 PM
If you really loved me, you'd love me even when I didn't agree with you.
Tom said to ignore you. I say that was an act of love, given the available alternatives.
Or at least compassion.
And in any event, infinite patience.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | April 14, 2007 at 07:11 PM
For example 5 million messages even at a generous size of 1.5 meg per email to account for attachments would only result in 7.5 meg of storage requirements. That wouldn't touch the capacity of a 250 gig or above hard drive.
Also long before the server got to full capacity, the admins would be getting trigger warnings to adjust way before this became an issue.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 14, 2007 at 07:17 PM
Math correction total storage would be 7.5 gig not meg.
Any way the available storage is likely more than sufficient.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 14, 2007 at 07:25 PM
Shucks decimal points 7,500 gig. Unless I'm too tired to count decimal points , still a manageable online store or archive number with today's storage capacity.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 14, 2007 at 07:44 PM
My coworkers manage a couple of dozen domains (we're web resellers, among other things) and keeping the spam out of the way so that accounts don't bump into disk quotas is a constant battle.
As for Outlook, the servers periodically lose mail. The first symptom is that your pop and imap lists become inconsistent, then within a day or two the entire system collapses. It takes approximately 3-4 days to rebuild the database, and everything that comes in over that period is lost. The microsoft-fellating IT dept at my husband's place of work goes through this about every 6 months or so. (He has his own mail servers that run on SMTP. Which is free, simply works, and never has these problems.)
I figure that's 1 million penis enlargement, 1 million breast enlargement, 1 million phony stock tips, 1 million offshore pharmacy ads, and 1 million babelfished Russian erotic novel excerpts...Posted by: cathyf | April 14, 2007 at 07:46 PM
Sylvia: Take my advice and stay off the Duke threads at JOM and that way you won't see how otherwise intelligent nice people go alittle nuts. If you are in for self-abuse go to DU, KOS, or FDL. Your blood pressure will stay lower, you'll live longer, and you won't be so apt to want to beat the dog when you log off. One who speaks from experience.
Posted by: Sara | April 14, 2007 at 07:50 PM
Lady Sara
I could see ya lovin a dog to death.
Maybe kill the monitor but never beat a dog in your case.
Just doesn't fit somehow.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 14, 2007 at 07:58 PM
I did an exhaustive analysis of this issue and have come to an unassailable conclusion. Since the analysis is rather lengthy, I didn't post it here, but sent it to everyone in an email. just pull up that email, and all your questions will be answered.
Posted by: Lew Clark | April 14, 2007 at 08:00 PM
See a pithy tongue-in-cheek visual that skewers Karl Rove and the Bush administration's disregard for accountability...here:
www.thoughttheater.com
Posted by: Daniel DiRito | April 14, 2007 at 08:07 PM
True Slim. My pets are my babies and I've always preferred their company to humans.
Posted by: Sara | April 14, 2007 at 08:15 PM
cathyf- heh.
Somewhere in the executive office must be the person getting the emails from "the people", no? I wonder how many jillions of constituent emails the WH gets every day.
Posted by: Maybeex | April 14, 2007 at 08:16 PM
I have been watching the TV1 30th anniversary of the Alex Halley TV movie "Roots," which I haven't seen since the original broadcast. I'd forgotten how good it is.
Posted by: Sara | April 14, 2007 at 08:17 PM
My bold prediction is that outside the beltway and the MSNBC crazies, this thing will have as much traction as the tires on the '47 Ford I drove in high school.
Posted by: Other Tom | April 14, 2007 at 08:30 PM
As a devotee of the lefts thinking, let me explain exactly what CREW belives occurred here.
The White House does not used servers and hard drives to store their e-mails, as we know. The e-mails are kept in Karl Rove's wizard hat and can be deleted with a simply spell from him or his dark alter ego, Richard Baby Hater Cheney. Now since Rove can delete all e-mails at any time due to his facsist bargain with the devil. We know that Rove and Cheney are colluding to hasten global warming so the devil can roam the earth freely and Rove can declare himself President for life.
Therefore Rove most likely just threaten Fitzgerald that he would suffocate a hundred puppies if he pursued the e-mail issue, and Fitzgeral backed down to save the poor puppies lives, because he knew Rove wouldn't hessitate to kill a puppy after carrying out 9/11 with the help of the Jews.
Hope that clears up your confusion.
Posted by: Poppy | April 14, 2007 at 08:36 PM
75,000 Voter Cards Found In Atlanta Dumpster
Posted by: Sara | April 14, 2007 at 08:43 PM
TM- if you don't agree with the conspiracy, it must be that you are having trouble reading.
Posted by: Maybeex | April 14, 2007 at 08:52 PM
Has anyone thought to ask Senator John Kerry for his EMail archives...
If the Republican National Committee (a reelection committee) must archive their email under Federal guidance, than certainly the Democrat National Committee must do the same...
Maybe there is something of interest in those archives...
Or maybe, we will find a bunch of those emails 'deleted' as well!!!
If Rove wanted to hide his activities do any of you think it would be on an organizational mail system ran by any Republican reelection organization. He could have used the Heritage foundation email system or any of the like. Even better, a front organization which is designed to go bankrupt and physically destroy their hardware on demand from The One Who Rules Them All). He could have created hundreds of Yahoo email accounts. He could have used some Iraqi, Chinese, Iranian, North Korean, or French ISP as well…
Has anyone thought that maybe some government mandated privacy ruling might also require email deletion after a reasonable period – like three years…
Stupid, real stupid.
Posted by: Boghie | April 14, 2007 at 08:56 PM
Entertainer Don Ho Dead at 76
Posted by: Sara | April 14, 2007 at 10:03 PM
but I may as well be thinking about scribes and papyrus. HEH
Entertainer Don Ho Dead at 76
Bizzzzzare, I am listening to "Tiny Bubbles" RIGHT NOW!
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 14, 2007 at 10:21 PM
RATS RATS RATS....sorry for the open tag.
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 14, 2007 at 10:22 PM
Has anyone thought that maybe some government mandated privacy ruling might also require email deletion after a reasonable period – like three years…
UM...and TM will find this refresher delightful....If you recall, the Department of State said during the Libby trial that they only kept copies of emails for 30 days and then destroyed them --this had to do with Grossman and Armitage I think , in any event can't remember all the specifics, but I think it came about when Woodward came forward and it also had to do with Grossman and Armitage communications) -- I know they then took Armitage's wife's home computer or some such
Anyways - when this shocking detail came up during the trial --that DOS destroys all backed-up emails after 30 days --Emptywheel blew a gasket and was OUTRAGED at the DOS policy -------> kidding!
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 14, 2007 at 10:29 PM
This is so stupid. I have been reading around and I haven't seen where a crime has been committed that any emails are necessary for - it sounds like they are desperately trying to recreate the Nixon secretary tape without a crime...is it a crime to delete emails? Cuz i do it by the boatload on a daily basis - I get so much junk mail and recently was really deficient that I had let it get to something like 14,000...I didn't care what was deleted I just deleted them all - it's too tiresome to try and sort through.
But no matter, I just can't get past all these bright lights who themselves don't manage their actual mail severs believing Rove is so fantastic that he has all these special talents -- like managing to maintain years worth of savable emails on mainframes and then deleting the ones where he talks about his Hurricane machine.
Also, I can't help it --- but it sounds like Crew's **snitch** is the one who has committed a crime.
I hope they have it all on back-up and this snitch was set up in an access sting.
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 14, 2007 at 10:47 PM
I don't believe this!!!
Soros/CREW Demands Fitzgerald Re-Open Case against Karl Rove.
Can you fucking believe this?
Posted by: lurker9876 | April 14, 2007 at 11:01 PM
I'm with Fred Thompson that Libby is innocent. There was no crime, no intent, no opportunity, no motive, etc.
Posted by: lurker9876 | April 14, 2007 at 11:03 PM
RiehlWorld agrees with Thompson, too.
Season Of The Witch Hunt
Posted by: lurker9876 | April 14, 2007 at 11:04 PM
lurker- I'm sure it has nothing to do with the civil case against Rove in which CREW is representing the Wilsons.
Posted by: Maybeex | April 14, 2007 at 11:06 PM
RiehlWorld agrees with Thompson, too.
Season Of The Witch Hunt
Posted by: lurker9876 | April 14, 2007 at 11:06 PM
90 days.
Empty above
http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/24/libby-liveblog-wells-cross-examines-grossman/
However, I love this commenter from the above
Or this
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 14, 2007 at 11:16 PM
I have an experiment in mind. Why not ask IRS to investigate CREW's tax exempt status.?For example, why is tax exemptmoney (i/e/ tax funds in effect) being used to pursue the WIlson/Plame civil suit; why is CREW's work almost exclusively aimed at Dems? In the course of that we demand that all docs and correspondence, including all emails to the Hill and the DNC and the press be produced, and we'll find out how seriously to take the left's claims that the only way emails could be misarchived or lost was deliberate doc destruction.
Posted by: clarice | April 14, 2007 at 11:32 PM
good idea, clarice.
How much cooperation has there been between Conyers, Waxman, and Crew?
Who gave Crew this information-- did it come from Fitzgerald's investigation?
We need their emails, and I mean ALL of them. From the Congressional staffs, the DNC, their re-election committees, and maybe even their personal home email account. One never knows where the illicit doings might have taken place.
Posted by: Maybeex | April 14, 2007 at 11:40 PM
Posted by: cathyf | April 14, 2007 at 11:41 PM
Wait...if a Government body can request emails of a political organization, can't a citizen or citizen group (CREW, You and me) ask the same of the DNC in the form of a FOIA request?
Or even a political campaign - Kerry 04? I mean I THINK Kerry 04 has some interesting email - I'd also like their cell phone bills - particularly Joe Lockhart's - since he took a call from some old no body Koot in Texas to line-up the Tang memos -- that's enough for me?
Or any emails between Bruce Lindsey and Sandy Berger or Bill Clinton or his surrogates - the Archive called Bruce Lindsey - not the DOJ - when they noticed Berger was ripping off America and planting out doc in dead drops.
OR any emails between CREW - who receives tax EXEMPT non-profit status - do they have any emails between them and John Conyers office? Chuck- who heads up the DSCC?
Or, I'd like to see the emails Chuck and his staffers and DSCC staffers sent , internally, his office between DNC when he stole Michele Steele's personal information ( like the one when she asked what to do with Steeles's social and her high up staffer said "go to this credit site, pay for the report with our credit card - and here are more pointers on what to do ala Schumer)-- how he coordinated to have the fall girl's legal fees paid for by said committee ?
Hmmmm? Someone set up a paypal who knows how to do the FOIA requests....NOW!
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 14, 2007 at 11:48 PM
I'm in. However I can help. This is a truly worthy enterprise.
Posted by: SunnyDay | April 14, 2007 at 11:52 PM
OH and while the left tinfiols up - the Clinton Library has refused ALLLLLLLLLLL requests for information regarding Sandy Berger's dead drop escapades - so...forget all that pretend outrage.
OH...and Ronnie Earles's office too....Landmark Legal immediately did a FOIA request for all phone logs and communications and Earle fought it (I do NOT KNOW what Ronnie Earle has to hide!!!!! that he would HIDE such a routine request other than Joe Lockehart's cell phone number - and i thinks it's still hung up in appeal.
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 14, 2007 at 11:54 PM
I know I started up my computer a few weeks ago, only to find that every email for the past two calendar years was gone. I'm just a user, I have no idea how it happened, I know I didn't do anything to make it happen, but it did.
I'm having trouble determining how this whole missing emails (in a non-crime) has become a conspiracy of active involvement by people in the WH. If there is a problem, it is at the archivist end.
As TS points out, CREW was obviously looking for something in their capacity of Plame civil case attorneys, and has managed to turn this into something nefarious WH email system USERS did.
Posted by: Maybeex | April 14, 2007 at 11:55 PM
Since the Presidential Records Act (PRA) is being kicked around in all this, I finally got around to looking it up and guess what:
"The Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978, 44 U.S.C. ß2201-2207, governs the official records of Presidents and Vice Presidents created or received after January 20, 1981. The PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of the President from private to public, and established a new statutory structure under which Presidents must manage their records."
This was a post-Watergate law and established the ownership of OFFICIAL records of the President and Vice President to be public. By that law, the Pres/VP can't gather up all their stuff and lock it away, but must make it open to the public. But get the "official records" part.
Emails coming and going from anyone in the administration are not official records of the President/VP per se.
The reason this caught my attention is that I thought back on my 35 years in the federal government. Before email, there was no requirement to file copies of correspondence anywhere. Official documents were filed. Those documents often came in the mail, but it was the document, not the fact it came in the mail that dictated it's retention.
When email came along, same thing. Email was correspondence between two (or more) individuals. It was the right/responsibility of the sender/receiver to determine what would and would not be retained. And it was the content, not the fact it was an email that required it's retention. Our emails were kept on a common server, and an investigative agency could request copies of all emails on the server. But that would be under the same auspices as a wire tap. A belief that something was being transmitted through email that shouldn't be. Those emails were deleted periodically and it was the responsibility of the recipient to assure copies of required records were retained.
Long story short. I don't think there is any requirement to keep emails for any period of time either in government agencies or in the White House. I think this is another case of a law being thrown out as being violated by "Bushco", hoping that no one will actually read the law.
Posted by: Lew Clark | April 14, 2007 at 11:58 PM
Sorry TS FOIA only applies to the govt. The IRS will just hae to get involved and subpoena this stuff from CREW.
Posted by: clarice | April 14, 2007 at 11:58 PM
OK
Conyer's isn't Government?
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 15, 2007 at 12:03 AM
Interesting Lew. I'd have to check that out.
Sreve GIlbert reminds us of the fact that CREW sat on the innocuous emails and said nothing public about them until Fla law made it impossible to select a replacement for the ballot.
http://www.sweetness-light.com/archive/sorosdncs-crew-demands-fitzgerald-re-open-case>CREW
Posted by: clarice | April 15, 2007 at 12:03 AM
I think Congress set it up so it doesn't apply to them. Neither does the equal employment act or most other things.
Posted by: clarice | April 15, 2007 at 12:04 AM
Dammit, can't find it now...but someone left a reference to a 502 or 503 statue violation that i was able to dig up regarding unauthorized or illegally obtaining electronic data - weird that it was right before this...
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 15, 2007 at 12:11 AM
When email came along, same thing. Email was correspondence between two (or more) individuals.
Um...did the DNC record all Bruce Lindsey's phone conversation to all Dem operatives to archive them since this was a schoosh before email -- that replaced OCD phone?
Hmmm?
Seriously, how stupid it's gotten. I bet Bill and Hill and really all Dem runners are smacking their head that Empty's and co have gotten ahold of their party.
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 15, 2007 at 12:18 AM
Melanie sloan says:
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 15, 2007 at 12:27 AM
ts, it wasn't Walton. It was the judge assigned to the civil suit.
Posted by: clarice | April 15, 2007 at 12:32 AM
TS9Excellent post on the summary of the Dems 1st 100 days over at Flopping Aces
Neville Nancy's 100 Days of Shame!
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 15, 2007 at 12:49 AM
It was indeed the civil judge who has been consitently unimpressed with her attempts at showboating...
Walter pointed out the judges ruling that was smart enough not t buy into their "no address: request, being all ethically and all///he said in the address insted of "I" street - "Eye" street - as in "i've gt my "eye" on you ethichs watchdg.
Well, well, well...CREW is so "ethical"
Okay....
Essentiall, she screwed up and did a traceable way.
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/dc/Press_Releases/2006_Archives/Mar_2006/06122.htmlAnyhow....
Yes, I knew there was a seedy connection.
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 15, 2007 at 12:55 AM
Are you confusing Weiner with Steiner, ts?
Posted by: clarice | April 15, 2007 at 12:59 AM
No, I am impling the same dots the left does
•CREW Deputy Director and Communications Director Communications Director Naomi Seligman Steiner was formerly the Communications Director of Media Matters for America.
• CREW Special Projects Associate Lida Masoudpour was once a staffer at Media Matters and served as an intern in the office of Senator Hillary Clinton.
• Katie Barge Previously she had been research director at Media Matters for America. was Research Director at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee [under Schumer] until she resigned the post in November 2005 when under investigation as to whether Maryland Republican senate candidate Michael Steele's credit report had been illegally obtained. [1]
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 15, 2007 at 01:12 AM
Media Matters - CREW - unethical
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 15, 2007 at 01:14 AM
I see, ts..sorry I had missed it as originally written.
Posted by: clarice | April 15, 2007 at 01:16 AM
But are you sure Weiner was Steiner's immediate supervisor at the time in question?
Posted by: clarice | April 15, 2007 at 01:18 AM
Really? I don't think you are alone, ahem I think that's obvious, but occasionally I make it through.
Thanks for prodding me to make it understandable!
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 15, 2007 at 01:21 AM
Clarice, not sure I implied that - just an obvious cozy relationship with MM and CREW and the Dem's
SORRY...do the "ethic" math - Schumer through the staff who threw Weiner under a freight train because she screwed up - it was traceable !!!! and all these interconnected people are from Media Matters - committing crimes and then onto CREW - did CREW demand a SP or any investigation for the Schemer crime?
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 15, 2007 at 01:31 AM
You just see connections far faster than I can, ts..and you are more often right than not..I'm just trying to keep up/
It would make the story more juicy if Weiner had been Steiner's boss though.
Posted by: clarice | April 15, 2007 at 01:37 AM
A Letter Is No Substitute for a Personal Chat, Waxman Tells Rice
By Al Kamen
The tussling between Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, shows no signs of letting up.Posted by: Sara | April 15, 2007 at 01:43 AM
--It would make the story more juicy if Weiner had been Steiner's boss though.--
I don't think that is far fetched, do you?
Deputy Director and Communications Director Naomi Seligman Steiner was formerly the Communications Director of Media Matters for America.
Katie Barge Previously she had been research director at Media Matters for America
----
Why can't someone call Brock and ask him to produce the timetable?
I mean - Brock is into the truth now right?
I tell you, Brock has become a grotesque caricature of what he professed to be against.
Cool with me though.
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 15, 2007 at 01:49 AM
It is a good idea. Interesting no reporter has done so or even explored the multiple links w/ media matters.
Posted by: clarice | April 15, 2007 at 01:52 AM
Clarice
The "Steele" incident took plce in "2005"
It was founded in 2004
Deputy Director and Communications Director Naomi Seligman Steiner was formerly the Communications Director of Media Matters for America.
Katie Barge Previously she had been research director at Media Matters for America
They worked together - closely is the message that can be taken from the timeframe and operational level here..1 year.
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 15, 2007 at 01:58 AM
I've passed this on to someone to look at. If he can't. I'll ask someone else or do it myself, ts.
Posted by: clarice | April 15, 2007 at 02:04 AM
Some other stuff on CREW from a good site for research jump off point
Discovery the Networks - CREW Page
CREW has received financial backing from George Soros's Open Society Institute, Democracy Alliance, the Tides Foundation, the Streisand Foundation, the Arca Foundation, the David Geffen Foundation, the Wallace Global Fund, the Mayberg Family Charitable Foundation, the Woodbury Fund, and the Sheller Family Foundation -- all institutions distinguished by their support for far-left causes.
CREW's Executive Director is Melanie Sloan, a longtime Democrat operative who previously served as Nominations Counsel for Joe Biden's Senate Judiciary Committee (1993); Counsel for the Crime Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee for Charles Schumer (1994); Minority Counsel for the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee under John Conyers (1995-1998); and Assistant U.S. District Attorney for the District of Columbia (1998-2003).
Other CREW officials have similarly deep ties to the political Left. For example, Deputy Director and Communications Director Naomi Seligman Steiner was formerly the Communications Director of Media Matters for America. CREW Special Projects Associate Lida Masoudpour was once a staffer at Media Matters and served as an intern in the office of Senator Hillary Clinton. CREW Senior Counsel Tim Mooney previously served as Senior Counsel at Alliance for Justice (AFJ). CREW Counsel Dan Roth was formerly the Dorot Judicial Selection Fellow at AFJ. CREW Research Associate Robin Powers is a former Program Associate of AFJ who interned with Vital Voices Global Partnership and the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois. CREW Counsel Kimberly Perkins once worked as the Assistant General Counsel for the National Office of the NAACP, where she led the "Voting Rights & Redistricting Project" and "Election Protection" efforts. CREW Executive Assistant Melissa Cuerdon, who previously worked in the pharmaceutical industry, served internships at the Sierra Club and the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN).
For a small organization they have been involved in
Tom Delay
Mark Foley
Affair De Plame
From my viewpoint they are noting but the lead hatchet man group for the Soros mafia
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 15, 2007 at 02:14 AM
Clarice
Good, cuz they both worked for an organization that was only in operation a year before a crime happened...Katie Barge is the one who told the underling to
..• CREW Deputy Director and Communications Director Naomi Seligman Steiner was formerly the Communications Director of Media Matters for America.
Media Matters for America is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization founded in 2004
Micheal Steele's info was stolen in July 2005
Well, they weren't there long or they are both way overblowing their resumes. Communications director for 2 minutes gets you DC media kudos time?
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 15, 2007 at 02:21 AM
During my Foley research, I was able to make many connections of multiple links between CREW, the Tides Foundation, all the going's on at the Presedio and the Pelosi involvement in that mess.
Soros and his group of supporters that put together moveon and media matters and CREW have multiple links in a web of tied together mutual supporting groups.
Also tied in strongly into the whole mix is Fenton Communications.
All in all a bundle of coordinated effort to set their specific agenda and plan of attack.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 15, 2007 at 02:22 AM
From a Newsmax interview of Tom Delay
NewsMax: So you think the media plays much more of a part than in the past?
DeLay: No doubt about it. They are now either directly or indirectly working with the left. I have never seen it in my entire political career as bad as it is right now. They don't even try to hide behind objectivity. It's now a blatant upfront in your face. Another thing they have done is put together a huge powerful political coalition mainly designed by what I call the "Clinton Mafia." This is a well-coordinated coalition of over 700 organizations. It is incredibly well funded and it coordinates with the media … It is a very impressive political coalition.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 15, 2007 at 02:32 AM
---It is incredibly well funded and it coordinates with the media … It is a very impressive political coalition.---
Sad part is they aren't even embarrassed by it -- put Dan Froomkin on the top or the coordinated Townhouse Email message heap - shit Froomkin writes the outgoing for them. WAPO underwrites it obviously.
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 15, 2007 at 02:57 AM
So the picture develops that we have two teams or mafia groups of the political type that are on the left.
The Soros mafia and the Clinton mafia.
Generally they are in agreement with their objectives overall, but fighting an inside war for control of the message and the agenda.
Later in the Newsmax interview Delay did, he talks about the lack of a similar broad reaching equivalent on the right.
So many times we treat each issue of the day in isolation no matter how long it endures in the public eye.
But if you back off and look at the overall picture you see a tie in of recurring groups of influence and linkages between them and patterns develop.
Worse you very seldom get a good piece of commentary by the known pundits that even give a broad overview of the effect they are having on the political landscape.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 15, 2007 at 04:00 AM
But if you back off and look at the overall picture you see a tie in of recurring groups of influence and linkages between them and patterns develop.
Dems ALWAYS accuse what they are guilty of doing - they've coordinated this particular line of attack via email - and prolly destroyed the said emails in the process and worked out a "work around" so they don't have to worry about this.
I'm still working on the belief they've obtained illegal data - they same kind they cry themselves to sleep at night that a known terror suspect's privacy non-rights violated.
I'll try and dredge up the article that indicated many of the Leaks - in a round about way - may be to "cover" the whistle-blower.
If you take all leaks as a whole
1. NSA telecomm - who many citizens ARE talking to terrorists
2. SWIFT - How many US citizen were/are conducting biz with terrorists
3. Prisons - what will the captured reveal?
and now we have email
4. Who obtained RNC email data - why? Kill the program - 1, 2, 3, 4.
Posted by: topsecretk9 | April 15, 2007 at 04:20 AM
TS9
If you look for example at just one bit of the coordinated picture for example lets take Fenton Communications.
If you look at their client list you will see a who's who of left groups that they use to provide a ready source of guests for all the talking head shows to drive their message.
Review the history of Fenton from it's founding and it is a wake up call kind of thing that is way off the radar of the average person. Heck mention their name at a political gathering in conversation even and all you get is "Who".
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 15, 2007 at 04:44 AM
TS9
If you look for example at just one bit of the coordinated picture for example lets take Fenton Communications.
If you look at their client list you will see a who's who of left groups that they use to provide a ready source of guests for all the talking head shows to drive their message.
Review the history of Fenton from it's founding and it is a wake up call kind of thing that is way off the radar of the average person. Heck mention their name at a political gathering in conversation even and all you get is "Who".
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 15, 2007 at 04:46 AM
Sorry for the double post, but the site gave me a server busy overload message when I tried to post and when I reloaded a few minutes later the original copy didn't show, so I did not think it went thru.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 15, 2007 at 04:53 AM
Having a lot of issues with the net tonight even though at this time of the morning it has lighter traffic.
Guess the storm front is raising a bit of routing problems and a lot of headaches for the IT staffs at the server farms.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 15, 2007 at 04:57 AM
Just took a look at one stand alone computer I have here on my local area network that is dedicated to monitoring the health of all my net connections.
The latest report trends show a lot of issue with the net tonight.
Lots of lost packets and many retries to access sites my spider servers troll for data.
Many sites I commonly use show via trace routes that they are having to be routed in ways that significantly differ from the normal path of hops between here and there.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 15, 2007 at 05:06 AM
For example one blog was down for a while I read.
Ace of Spades had this to say
Severe Weather Warning!
Sorry about that, folks. We got taken out by the storms in the DFW area.
Actually, the storms passed uneventfully, but our hosting company had switched to backup power in case the grid went out. With the storms past, they switched back to the grid - and a 2500 amp circuit breaker blew.
Not good.
Update: Um, and comments are back now too.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 15, 2007 at 05:30 AM
I have more than a passing interest in when the net has health issues.
That is the reason for the puter that monitors that situation.
I trade in the background on the international currency markets so that is an issue for me.
About 2:30 this morning one of my servers dedicated to this that works on doing arbitrage of price mismatches between the various trading portals got locked out from all of them and got stuck for over seven minutes with no trade lock out and when the paths healed I got tagged for about a 9K loss due to non execution.
The net health computer was handshaking to my server warning of the issue but it was too late to recover.
Now the arbitrage server has to play mother may I with the net health server before placing trades until the issue heals.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 15, 2007 at 05:42 AM
At least the net health server did it's job that it stands for and captured all the data over the time interval with all the failed pings and trace routes and sent and email to the trading desk to document why it is requesting a trade invalidation due to net failure.
Checked and got an email reply to the message and the trade has been reversed.
Love it when a plan comes together.
Posted by: SlimGuy | April 15, 2007 at 05:52 AM