The Mighty Kos commissioned a poll to tell us that Ned Lamont defeats Joe Lieberman in Connecticut. Ooops! Too bad the election is over!
In related news, the assembled staff at Just One Minute has decided to release the results of various polls we commissioned in while under the influence of... well, under the influence of a voracious thirst for alternative history. Or something.
So to satisfy the insatiable thirst of others, I can now reveal that John Kerry defeats George Bush in a 2004 rematch. However, such a rematch is unlikely since Al Gore already defeated George Bush in 2000. (He gets knocked down...)
In other excellent news, Hubert Humphrey defeated Richard Nixon in 1968, but it is not all grim for Republicans - in 1948 Dewey managed to defeat Truman in a poll we would have commissioned back in 1951 (had we been alive), when Truman's approval rating was at 23%. Truman's backers can point to subsequent polls in which Truman managed to defeat Dewey again.
Meanwhile, one wonders - how much did the Kos Kids spend on this poll in Connecticut? And isn't there a starving Dem politician, or even a starving village in Africa, where the money could go to better use?
And isn't there a starving Dem politician, or even a starving village in Africa, where the money could go to better use?
Based on their track record, they oughta give to their least favored rivals.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | September 13, 2007 at 03:02 PM
The President In HD
A network insider tells TVNewser, tonight's Presidential address from the White House will be broadcast for the first time in high definition television. Previous events, including this year's State of the Union address, were in HD but now that the White House is wired, the networks can carry the speech in HiDef.
Posted by: SlimGuy | September 13, 2007 at 03:11 PM
Did Kos determine if Lamont would win the primary?
Posted by: BumperStickerist | September 13, 2007 at 03:23 PM
Just goes to prove long time broadcaster David Brinkley's point - if you want to work in politics or comment on the political landscaape, the best preparation is not a degree in Political Science, Government or Journalism, but a degree in History.
Posted by: Sara | September 13, 2007 at 04:02 PM
Kerry could not possibly have beaten Bush in Koslandia. Dean won all primaries and carried fifty states in the general.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | September 13, 2007 at 04:06 PM
Kos is such a total douche. So what does that make the mindless morons who hang on his every vinegar-scented syllable?
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | September 13, 2007 at 04:37 PM
Enema-atics? Full of sh!t.
Posted by: Sara | September 13, 2007 at 04:56 PM
Sara went a long way around to get the point across. Kos is an anti-american (if he's even an American) ass kisser for Clintons Socialist dream.
Posted by: Scrapiron | September 13, 2007 at 06:16 PM
If Kos had his way, we would have had a different winner in WWII, Korea, Desert Storm, and Grenada.
Posted by: MikeS | September 13, 2007 at 07:36 PM
I think this is Kos's favorite nursery rhyme...
If wishes were horses, beggars would ride
If turnips were swords, I'd wear one by my side.
If ifs and ands were pots and pans,
there'd be no need for tinkers' hands.
If frogs had wings, and snakes had hair,
And automobiles flew through the air,
If a watermelon grew on a huckleberry vine,
Then we'd have winter in the summertime.
Posted by: MarkJ | September 13, 2007 at 08:41 PM
I predict the people that give money to Kos when he begs for subscriptions will be upset this is what their money is going toward.
Posted by: MayBee | September 13, 2007 at 09:34 PM
Another Republican stands up for General Patraeus in a full page New York Times Ad.
Joinrudy2008
Posted by: Ann | September 13, 2007 at 10:11 PM
I really liked The President's speech.
Posted by: Jane | September 13, 2007 at 10:12 PM
I really liked the speech,too. However, I found myself laughing OUT LOUD at the rebuttal
by whats his name.
Posted by: Ann | September 13, 2007 at 10:18 PM
Jane, I like the speech too.
Ann, whathisname must have had his boxers in a wad. He had a grimace (sp) after every sentence.
Seriously, what has become of the Democrat party? I am tired of hearing it is all about politics. Where is their collective love of this country? I never see any "liking," much less love.
Posted by: centralcal | September 13, 2007 at 10:24 PM
The following is a great example of the Democrat PartY. Nancy Pelosi said this TODAY:
““We need a new direction that redeploys our troops from Iraq, rebuilds our military and refocuses on fighting terrorism across the world,” Ms. Pelosi said.”
THE WOMAN IS NUTTERS.
Posted by: Ann | September 13, 2007 at 10:29 PM
Good for Rudy! He's my chioce to fight Hillary and he's showing his stuff!
Posted by: Syl | September 13, 2007 at 10:29 PM
I like the speech as well.
Posted by: Sara | September 13, 2007 at 10:34 PM
I woulda won! I woulda! I woulda!
Posted by: trelane | September 13, 2007 at 10:38 PM
Syl: Tonight, I have to say I agree 100% It's about time somebody, anybody, on our side showed their stuff! And, I mean that from the depth of my being. I am so sick of namby pamby!
Posted by: centralcal | September 13, 2007 at 10:38 PM
Centraical,
Another great example of the Democrat Party was John Edwards paid political rebuttal only seen on PMSNBC (Because he refuses to go on FOX because they are mean or something)
It was basically John Edwards stomping his foot saying we don't believe you, Mr Bush.
"NO TIME LINE, NO FUNDING, NO EXCUSES!!!!!!!!
(STOMP FOOT, STOMP FOOT)
Another laugh riot.
Posted by: Ann | September 13, 2007 at 10:49 PM
Well it made Jane Hamser over at FDL happy. She really worked for Ned early on.
Loving Ned
(I do hope Jane continues her remarkable recovery from cancer, and maybe she could go back to the movies.)
Posted by: Jodi | September 13, 2007 at 10:52 PM
Ann: Thank you for the synopsis. I simply could not bring myself to tune in to PMSNBC and add to their ratings, nor do I give a damn what silky pony/Breck girl has to say about anything - and apparently, not too many idiot Democrats do either, judging by his standing in the polls.
I agree that he is probably the (sick) humor in the serious discussion tonight. Also, I think it is telling that he spent his money for air time on the absolutely LOWEST rated news channel! What a man!
Posted by: centralcal | September 13, 2007 at 10:55 PM
If I could go back in time, I'd do better in gym class so I could beat Jane in the big mud wrestle for HIT's affections. Unfortunately, kos has taken the time travel secret.
Posted by: Clarice | September 13, 2007 at 11:00 PM
Clarice,
Speaking of Mr. Blue Eyes, is he off getting famous again? I miss him too!
Posted by: Ann | September 13, 2007 at 11:23 PM
I'm the last to know, Ann.*sigh*
Posted by: Clarice | September 13, 2007 at 11:31 PM
You girls kill me.
Posted by: Barry | September 13, 2007 at 11:38 PM
Last I heard, the chainsaw was out of gas and he was trying to get it to run on the last of the Wild Turkey. I told him it wouldn't work and to try Bacardi 151. Haven't had word back back yet on how it went.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | September 13, 2007 at 11:41 PM
You are making that up, Rick. H&R would never waste booze on a machine!
Sheesh! How gullible do you think we are?!?
Posted by: cathyf | September 13, 2007 at 11:54 PM
This site is unquestionably visited regularly by the most unpatriotic of americans - those willing to kick the chaos created by BushCo down the road to the next president. How unamerican and partisan can one get!?
Posted by: Sam | September 14, 2007 at 02:30 AM
don't question patriotism Sam - you hypocrite.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | September 14, 2007 at 02:33 AM
Hey thirty-percenters! Your boy read a good speech off the teleprompter. Unfortunately his happy news was puffed full of air. The man has no serious plan for getting out of Iraq. He is leaving that task for his successor.
Posted by: buma | September 14, 2007 at 04:43 AM
Sam, how dare you call Truman and LBJ unpatriotic!
Posted by: Ralph L | September 14, 2007 at 04:54 AM
Rudy is looking smart because this is the time to go after her. The others are pygmies compared to her, and if she can be taken out early, she should be. (Unlike last time around, when it might have been better to go easy on Dean until he won the nomination.)
Fred's guy Rich Galen went after her on the Hsu matter Tuesday. He should start pounding on that one, and the pardon stuff Rick linked to about her brothers, too. Romney could work the Sandy Berger angle for a trifecta, but he's less worried about Hillary than he is about Fred these days.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 06:17 AM
Also off-topic, but when I see the name JENNIFER LOVEN, I know what I'm in for. Can you imagine reading this if you thought it was straight news reporting?
Bush Preserves Big Troop Level in Iraq
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 06:30 AM
You know the current crop of dems are like a bunch of Alzheimer's patients who have been left to wander around and ruminate. Last night Mr. RI spent his whole rebuttal talking about the "dem plan". By the end of it I was yelling: "What's the plan, what's the plan".
And of course there is no plan. There are no thoughts, there is just regurgitation of the kos inspired talking points. And since so few people pay attention, for lots of folks that's enough.
It's really sad.
Posted by: Jane | September 14, 2007 at 06:58 AM
So Hsu is saying Obama outed him? Since he was taking money from him, I wonder why? Was he jealous of the amounts that Hillary got?
Posted by: Jane | September 14, 2007 at 07:06 AM
Beastly pic on the front page at HotAir. Scroll down at your own risk.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 07:09 AM
Seems like a logical move for Obama, Jane. He knows there's no other way to take her out, and I bet he knows he's not getting VP, so going for the jugular is a reasonable strategy. Of course, she knows that, too, and probably dangles VP to try to keep him in line, but he probably also knows it's just a ploy, so why not pull out the stilletto and go for it? Hsu knows.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 07:13 AM
Clarice is on "MUST READS of The Day" on Lucianne.com. Congrats!
Of course we already know she is a must read
anywhere, anyday :)
Posted by: ann | September 14, 2007 at 08:20 AM
The Dems are trying to promote the unconstitutional, and anti-democratic and illiberal, idea that the Department of Justice should be independent of the control exerted by the electorate through the regular election of a term-limited executive.
It's insidious, and very dangerous.
======================
Posted by: kim | September 14, 2007 at 09:29 AM
More on Norman Hsu:
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=local&id=5657188
"Our sheriffs office tells me, the defendant had a checkbook in his possession when he was arrested that reflected a $6 million dollar balance in that checkbook at least," said Hautzinger.
Posted by: ann | September 14, 2007 at 09:31 AM
Kim, if you are referring to the nomination of Ted Olson I agree:
Borking Mr. Olson
Posted by: ann | September 14, 2007 at 09:44 AM
Yes, Ann. I originally got that argument from Clarice.
========
Posted by: kim | September 14, 2007 at 09:54 AM
I prefer 'come to think of it', but otherwise I agree to the end.
========================
Posted by: kim | September 14, 2007 at 10:04 AM
clarice- for you and fedora.
The other day I posted a link to an Ohio Group that listed the biggest individual donors for Ohio Proposition 2 to be George Soros, Susie Tompkins, and Norman Hsu (and some others). I don't know how to find another source on that.
Proposition 2 was in the 2006 election, and it was a fair wages law.
Norman Hsu and Susie Tompkins were proponents of making money off Chinese/Hong Kong/San Fran sweat shops. Their reasons for trying to pass a fair wages law in the US seems obvious- it would force their competition to pay workers more. The more US workers make, the more expensive the product, the bigger the demand for cheap-labor Chinese (or illegally made) product.
Buell, Hsu and Soros can back those kinds of laws looking altruistic toward American workers, while in reality they are boosting China.
I would love it if Fedora would look into that particular line more-- did Hsu contribute to pro-fair wages groups? Who else did?
It would also be interesting to know if he and his co-horts donated to pro-Kyoto type groups.
Posted by: MayBee | September 14, 2007 at 10:15 AM
So, if he has $6M in his checking account, who's the genius that decided to set bail at $5M?
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 10:17 AM
(Excellent line on motive, MayBee.)
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 10:19 AM
The genius has been found.
“Two million wasn’t enough to keep Mr. Hsu from running. We’ll see if $5 million will do it.”
And his bank accounts haven't been frozen yet?
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 11:05 AM
Hmmm - didn't that NY "investor" of Hsu's claim that recent checks he gave them had bounced? How many checking accounts might he have?
Posted by: centralcal | September 14, 2007 at 11:13 AM
So, if he has $6M in his checking account, who's the genius that decided to set bail at $5M?
In all fairness, it is the law in CO and in a display of remarkable PR acumen (I must say) the DA Hautzinger responded personally to an email asking if was crazy, displayed at Suitably Flip
He asked for 50 mil.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | September 14, 2007 at 11:30 AM
Nobody has yet come out with the text of the suicide note(s)?
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 11:39 AM
(Thanks, ts.)
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 11:39 AM
Btw, I wonder what the word "cash" means in this report.
Hsu's Bail Set at $5 Million Cash
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 11:41 AM
sam I am-
those willing to kick the chaos created by BushCo down the road to the next president. How unamerican and partisan can one get!?
Because this President had such a clean slate and so much to work with regarding the foreign policy of the previous President.
Posted by: RichatUF | September 14, 2007 at 11:42 AM
Maybee-
Hsu contribute to pro-fair wages groups? Who else did?
I can't find links yet [the afternoon coffee hasn't quite kicked in yet] but the initive here in Florida was pushed hard by SEIU (part of the shadow pary coalition that Soros put together-that was 2004). They were involved in another initive in 2006 and can't quite put my finger on it.
Posted by: RichatUF | September 14, 2007 at 11:54 AM
Maybee-
Kyoto was a dead letter by the time Bush got into office. Enron's collapase took a lot of wind out of its sails, so I doubt that Hsu money went in that direction. I hope Hillary! gets that list out, or that someone in her campaign leaks it on his way out the door.
Posted by: RichatUF | September 14, 2007 at 12:01 PM
I'd like to take a short break to whine about the topic title. I've now had Cher's dulcet tones running through my head for nearly 24 hours. I think it rots your brain cells right out!
Posted by: cathyf | September 14, 2007 at 12:13 PM
MayBee --- I posted this a few days ago
Warning-----> The link is a Word Doc
It is the text of Bill Clinton's words at some gala and NGO's
...and USAID - ie taxpayers
anyways, it might be an angle
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | September 14, 2007 at 12:17 PM
I've now had Cher's dulcet tones running
It must be Cher week. Rush just had a parody on Cher's Gypsies, Tramps and Thieves.
Posted by: Sue | September 14, 2007 at 12:38 PM
This is as stupid as betting on Sunday's football games on Monday and losing.
After several years of calulating, the solution to global warming is to stop printing newspapers - saving those trees is all that is needed.
Posted by: PMII | September 14, 2007 at 12:43 PM
Did HSU help fund Schumer's illegal theft of Michael Steele's credit info?
HSU, NORMAN
NEW YORK,NY 10016
COOL PLANETS
6/9/2005
$26,700
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Cmte
HSU, NORMAN
NEW YORK,NY 10016
COOL PLANETS
9/30/2004
$12,000
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Cmte
that's 38,700 bucks
-------
also Maybee---
Hsu, Norman
New York, NY 10012
NEW YORK STATE COMMITTEE OF THE WORKING FAMILIES PARTY $10,000
primary 09/14/06
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | September 14, 2007 at 12:52 PM
re bail
To post bail, you must hand over 10% in cash.
I think there's a confusion between 'bond' and 'bail'. Not so clear on all this myself but I think it goes something like this...
His bail was set at $50,000,000 and in order to not sit in jail right now, he must post 10% of that in cash which would be $5,000,000.
OR, perhaps colorado law is different or the judge had leeway to require posting the entire amount of bail in cash. (Normally it's 10%).
Posted by: Syl | September 14, 2007 at 01:23 PM
Bail and bond are being used interchangeably, I think, though they really aren't the same. Bail is generally the amount that is set to be released from custody, pending trial, etc. A bond is what is posted to bail you out. In some instances a judge will order a cash bond only. If a bondsman is involved, 10% is usually required with the bondsman being the surety on the balance (the 10% coming from the "client" and isn't returned to the "client" when the case is over, the bondsman retains it). If a bondsman is not involved, the entire amount is required. Look at Hsu in California. He put up the entire 2 million in cash, didn't he?
Posted by: Sue | September 14, 2007 at 02:16 PM
If a bondsman is not involved, the entire amount is required.
I should say is usually required. There has to be some kind of surety for the balance, so I can't imagine they would allow you out posting 10% without a bondsman or some other collateral.
Posted by: Sue | September 14, 2007 at 02:19 PM
Am I the only one who wonders what Semanticleo thinks of the Kos/In-bred Ned thing? Or Hsu? Or anything on God green Earth, because goodness knows, 'cleo is one sunburst of insight, fer shur.
Cordially...
Posted by: Rick | September 14, 2007 at 03:15 PM
Well, the NY Times is predictable. In their editorial (No Exit, No Strategy), they echo their deeply discounted MoveOn ad, whilst simultaneously reiterating Mr Wilson's accusations of "twisted" intelligence:
Nice to see the "big lie" technique still has its adherents on the left. Also, amusingly, they elide the obvious lack of a counterproposal from the Dems. Here, they manage to chide the Republicans for not having a counter to their own plan, and pretend the Dems are in the process of formulating one: "Hide behind the troops"? Nice. And it's also nice to see the Dems are going to start planning now, four years on.Posted by: Cecil Turner | September 14, 2007 at 03:16 PM
FYI...Wyatt's lawyers seek to block address book
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | September 14, 2007 at 03:21 PM
I'm sure Mr Hsu will not skip bail,but if his brother visits from the old country or he starts bathing unsupervised.....
Posted by: PeterUK | September 14, 2007 at 04:15 PM
Yes, Cecil, since the objective isn't to actually win, or stabilize, or secure, or anything else but but to end the battle for Iraq, unless there's a "strategy" to surrender, there's no strategy at all. Very logical.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 04:26 PM
In case anyone missed this: General Lies and Power.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 04:50 PM
good work, tops. That .doc link didn't work for me, but I know Bobby came out just last year. If he was facilitating movie parties, for the Clintons, he was certainly not a generic bundler to them. How fascinating.
The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_Families_Party>Working Families Party
Endorsed all the NY Democratic candidates this year, including Elliot Spitzer.
Shockingly, it was founded by someone from ACORN and two unions. It supports "well-paying jobs". Just like Hsu himself.
Posted by: MayBee | September 14, 2007 at 05:02 PM
Oh Tops- good for you. LA Times has that story now!
Posted by: MayBee | September 14, 2007 at 05:07 PM
Imagine if Hsu had been named Hillary's Ambassador to China or put in the Hong Kong Consulate.
Posted by: MayBee | September 14, 2007 at 05:10 PM
Drudge links to an item at MediaBistro citing a report by Andrea Mitchell that there is a lot of "in fighting" and even a shouting match going on among Hillary staff over the Hsu thing.
Golly, I wonder is Andrea was drinking before this report? (Didn't she use that lame excuse back in the day when reporting that everyone knew who Plame was?)
Posted by: centralcal | September 14, 2007 at 05:17 PM
I was able to fix ts's link to the Word doc of Clinton's speech here.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 05:24 PM
A recommended read:
Why The Left Fears Petraeus
Snippet:
Read it all. Very interesting.
Posted by: Sara | September 14, 2007 at 05:30 PM
Maybee, if you find more on the "fair wage" contributions, I hope you will post the info. I'm bored to tears with the Hsu story, but this twist might make it interesting.
Posted by: Sara | September 14, 2007 at 05:48 PM
Centralcal,
I doubt that Andrea was drinking. Imagine yourself a minion of the Beast in this situation. You know that she doesn't dare fire McAuliffe (the responsible party) for fear of losing the famed Rolodex. You know that someone will be sent to the headsman and you've heard the Beast screaming herself hoarse for a week now. There's bound to be some tension until the sacrifice is selected. It's undoubtedly worse than usual because the depth and breadth of the problem - and the totality of the public's reaction - remains an unknown.
The Beast is not fond of unknowns. She prefers the deck stacked to the fiftieth card.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | September 14, 2007 at 05:49 PM
I would love it if Fedora would look into that particular line more-- did Hsu contribute to pro-fair wages groups? Who else did?
It would also be interesting to know if he and his co-horts donated to pro-Kyoto type groups.
Posted by: MayBee
Maybee it shows up in the FEC database as donations to a PAC for that issue.
I have been working the list of donors to that PAC and looking for same date donation patterns to that PAC as well as other donations by them to same candidates the Hsu people did.
It would be a whole lot easier if Hillary is to release the returned donor list to have names to work with.
Right now it is a matter of trying to reverse engineer the whole thing.
Posted by: SlimGuy | September 14, 2007 at 05:53 PM
It's easy to forget just how nauseating Bill Clinton is, so I caution you not to read that speech immediately after eating.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 05:54 PM
Rick, I very much doubted Andrea was drinking, too. My sarcasm was that this report is supposed to air on MSNBC (this weekend?) and the Hildebeasties might not be too happy about their "tensions" becoming so public.
I just wondered if, when pressured, Andrea will try to walk back her comments like she has been known to do in the past.
I think, also, that the surface of this Hsu story has only begun to be scratched. I hope the WSJ continues to dig and reveal.
Posted by: centralcal | September 14, 2007 at 05:55 PM
Btw, I wonder what the word "cash" means in this report.
Means I guess no 10% cash bond outs. Has to full 100% cash bond.
Posted by: SlimGuy | September 14, 2007 at 06:02 PM
Maybee, if you find more on the "fair wage" contributions, I hope you will post the info. I'm bored to tears with the Hsu story, but this twist might make it interesting.
Posted by: Sara
He also contributed with others of his group to that initiative Rob Reiner had out your way.
Posted by: SlimGuy | September 14, 2007 at 06:08 PM
I saw the same full cash thing mentioned today in a story over at Malkin's about 3 illegals arrested on a rape charge and the judge disallowed the 10% bond on their case forcing a full dollar amount bond.
Posted by: SlimGuy | September 14, 2007 at 06:19 PM
He also contributed with others of his group to that initiative Rob Reiner had out your way.
Universal Pre-School at taxpayer expense?
Posted by: Sara | September 14, 2007 at 06:58 PM
TM:
In related news, the assembled staff at Just One Minute has decided to release the results of various polls we commissioned in while under the influence of...
Despite the assembled staff's attempts, to date, Tom has suppressed the release of the TIME 2006 Man of the Year Readers' Poll...
Posted by: hit and run | September 14, 2007 at 07:00 PM
Hmmm. Maybe.
Link
Posted by: Sara | September 14, 2007 at 07:02 PM
YES ON 82 PRESCHOOL FOR ALL CA $10,000 07/28/2005
HSU, NORMAN
Total Given to Date: $17,300 (6 records)
Address: NEW YORK, NY 10016
Employer: BECAUSE/COMPONENTS LTD
Occupation: MANAGING DIRECTOR
Posted by: SlimGuy | September 14, 2007 at 07:29 PM
At first I thought it might be the other Norman Hsu out in CA who sits on a school board out there, but the address of the donation is our guy.
Posted by: SlimGuy | September 14, 2007 at 07:34 PM
"‘I would find the most beautiful Palestinian girl and when they come up there with 100 soldiers I would walk alone holding this child’s hand and I would give him a bouquet of flowers from her and have her welcome him and offer to tour the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock and tell him when it’s yours he could come back every day.’"
That's how he landed in it the last time.
Posted by: PeterUK | September 14, 2007 at 07:50 PM
I see two links at Drudge, but I really don't get it. Does anyone know why we're supposed to listen to Newt Gingrich?
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 08:05 PM
So Norman Hsu is "disgraced," as we've read in many AP stories, and we've also read that Hillary was planning to return the bundled contributions to the bundled donors (and we've pondered how that's legal if the contributions were made through straw donors). We've read that Hsu stole $40M from another lefty who wanted the money held for recovery for his investors, but from other reports it seems that he'd probably be happy to give it all to Hillary anyway. Now we read that the refunds have already been made.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 14, 2007 at 08:27 PM
How will Hillary react to this
Posted by: SlimGuy | September 14, 2007 at 08:41 PM
Oh and a little more
Posted by: SlimGuy | September 14, 2007 at 08:45 PM
Slim and everyone:
Three years ago at the Tavern on the Green, Bill was pitchman for a little-known Internet search engine founded by Marc Armand Rousso, a former penny stocks promoter who in the late 1990s pleaded guilty to stock fraud in the United States and was convicted of similar fraud in France.
I might not have the names precisely right and too tired to fetch them -- but wouldn't it be a hoot if this --little-known Internet search engine founded by Marc Armand Rousso - was where the Woodstock Rosenman employee met Hsu ?-- didn't he/she say they met Hsu at a little internet company they worked?
--
Maybee -- what did the LA time pick that you said good for me?
---
Extraneus -- thanks for the link help - and that Clinton passage was soooo gagarama. Classic.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | September 15, 2007 at 02:55 AM
Novak:
The biggest DUUUUUUHHHH!
A few days ago I linked to a page that detailed a few of her fundraiser heads and said you'd be hearing their names in the future because Hillary and Bill throw EVVVVVVVERYboby Under the bus!. Seriously, taking a position under them is the fricken kiss of death.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | September 15, 2007 at 03:06 AM
WOW -WOW- WSJ --- and warning -- PUT DOWN the drink before you read the last sentence
Good friend of the family says -- he just came out of the blue -- those Clinton's and the journalist just keep buying bridge after bridge from them.
I sure hope Flip is keeping track of the totals that keep popping up with pacs and state initiatives and groups and crap---it's adding up- and looking like the democrat party has been funded on the backs of ponzi victims - isn't positively enron of them?
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | September 15, 2007 at 03:29 AM
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | September 15, 2007 at 05:46 AM
Tops- the LA Times had the story of Hsu making the evening possible at the gala for the movie "Bobby".
Posted by: MayBee | September 15, 2007 at 10:15 AM