I refer of course to the tidal surge that Matt Drudge headlined last night as threatening life as we know it in Merry Old England:
A tidal surge broke some flood defences along the Norfolk coast this morning, but the widespread damage predicted last night appears to have been avoided.
Thousands of people were evacuated from the coast of East Anglia after the Environment Agency warned of "extreme danger to life and property" from flooding.
The high point of the surge hit Norfolk around 8am, breaching defences and flooding roads in some areas, but there was no damage on the scale feared.
In Great Yarmouth, predicted to be one of the worst-affected towns, police said there was no risk to property.
Across the rest of the Norfolk and Suffolk coast there has been only localised flooding, and in some resorts surfers even took to the sea to take advantage of the waves.
And The Netherlands experienced record high water levels but minor damage:
Amsterdam - Ten-metre-high waves beat the North Sea coast of the Netherlands overnight, but damage caused by the storm remained limited. The association of insurance companies VvV said on Friday the damage due to the storm was "limited" and estimated it at no more than 500,000 euros (736,000 dollars).
The figure was small compared to the last three major storms in the past six years which caused some 480 million euros in damage, with the last major storm of January 2007 alone contributing 330 million euros.
The north-west storm that raced over the Netherlands overnight with wind speeds of more than 100 kilometres per hour caused record- high water levels.
"Overated"? Shouldn't that be "overate"?
Posted by: sammler | November 09, 2007 at 07:29 AM
Vote Jmax
We need a little cushion here folks. After watching the Weblog people treat online voting like King County election supervisors, I'd say the spread needs to go to 10% (two more points) to be sure.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | November 09, 2007 at 08:27 AM
Rick,
Have you been able to figure out the actual point spread?
Posted by: Jane | November 09, 2007 at 08:49 AM
Jane,
No. They are quite good at keeping the numbers relatively hidden. I don't know if 1% = 500 or 5,000.
The Weblog voting was different, you could track count rather than percentage. When the "polls closed" on the voting for the Weblog awards, Climate Audit was shown to be about 1400 votes up. The folks running the awards allowed votes to be cast and counted after the polls closed and now Climate Audit is second by 50 or so votes. Sorta like King County, WA in '04 - or upickem under the Daley machine.
The Lowe's contest isn't like that at all but a little dedication to voting never hurts.
BTW - The possible Weblog fraud is directly tied to this "surge" event in the UK. The warmermongers desperately need a big "event" to keep the fraud alive. Allowing an "auditor" who has been instrumental in exposing the statistical garbage passing for science under the heading "Climate" to be rated "Best" just isn't allowable.
IMO - the best science blog last year was run Roger Pielke Sr.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | November 09, 2007 at 09:20 AM
The folks running the awards allowed votes to be cast and counted after the polls closed
WOw - did they announce that?
And who is running it?
Posted by: Jane | November 09, 2007 at 09:26 AM
Jane,
They "allowed" it in the sense that their security could be gamed rather easily. There is definitely a chance that the system was gamed by both sides but I'm displeased with "after polls closed" problems. One of those little cable thingys on the back of the computer could have been pulled - that certainly works on my computer. Accidentally, mostly.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | November 09, 2007 at 09:39 AM
OT - Off Topic
I found this article an interesting read; it's linked at RCP and is a book review, as you can see:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007
/11/kelo_eminent_domain_the_lust_f.html
November 09, 2007
Kelo, Eminent Domain, & the Lust for Land
By Heather Wilhelm
Bulldozed: "Kelo," Eminent Domain, and the American Lust for Land
By Carla T. Main
Encounter Books, October 2007
Since the dawn of humanity, there have been a few classic, sure-fire incentives to get people to do all sorts of crazy things. Love is one of them. Money is another. And if recent history is any indication, another age-old ingredient for unhinged behavior will loom especially large in the American psyche and public debate for years to come.
The ingredient in question, of course, is land.
Posted by: anduril | November 09, 2007 at 09:57 AM
OT moonbat question:
Clinton came out for waterboarding - before he decided to oppose it. What he said is that people should act like Jack Bauer.
Is there any evidence that anyone was water boarded during his administration (except maybe Vince Foster)?
Posted by: Jane | November 09, 2007 at 10:43 AM
Depends on your definition of "waterboarding". Actually, he did something much worse---renditioned people off to places like Saudi Arabia and Syria for questioning by local authorities.
Posted by: Clarice | November 09, 2007 at 11:35 AM
Clarice,
Can you point me in the right direction? Like his position on health care Bill is now saying Hillary is right, his support of torture when necessary was wrong. It's been demanded that I name names. Got any?
Don't waste any time on it. It's not worth
Posted by: Jane | November 09, 2007 at 12:02 PM
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/006045.php
Posted by: Clarice | November 09, 2007 at 12:14 PM
The aclu on http://www.aclu.org/safefree/extraordinaryrendition/22203res20051206.html>Clinton starting rendition.
Hillary and Bill's short term support of torture when necessary. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0907/6050.html>Politco
http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:O2QAKBlBp98J:www.ndu.edu/library/n4/n035603f.pdf+Failure+of+Clinton+healthcare&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us>NYU on Healthcare program failure.
Posted by: MayBee | November 09, 2007 at 12:23 PM
Thanks guys, I appreciate it.
Posted by: Jane | November 09, 2007 at 12:42 PM
Rick:
They are quite good at keeping the numbers relatively hidden. I don't know if 1% = 500 or 5,000.
I do. Well, I at least know that 500 < 1%
That is, the move from 30% to 31% involved > 500 votes.
How do I know that?
Did I mention that last weekend mrs hit and run was out of town?
Posted by: hit and run | November 09, 2007 at 04:27 PM
Uh oh. Now we need even more votes for Jessica. (BTW - it's 31%-29% now)
The problem is that one IP producing multiple votes is far too easy to catch - and correct. It's not quite time for the "Can I ask a small favor" email to the top 100 names on your address list but a short reflection on the possibility is in order. If things get tighter, there's always prayer - and a brief chat with the church or synagogue secretary.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | November 09, 2007 at 05:11 PM
好秘书 中国呼吸网 肿瘤网 工作总结 个人工作总结 半年工作总结 年终工作总结 单位工作总结 教师工作总结 教学工作总结 学校工作总结 德育工作总结 财务工作总结 医务工作总结 安全工作总结 乡镇工作总结 党员工作总结 团委工作总结 公司工作总结 实习工作总结 班主任工作总结 党支部工作总结 办公室工作总结 学生会工作总结 总结报告 工作报告 政府报告 述职报告 述廉报告 考察报告 自查报告 情况报告 调研报告 调查报告 申请报告 辞职报告 实习报告 验收报告 评估报告 汇报体会 工作汇报 思想汇报 汇报材料 情况通报 情况汇报 心得体会 学习心得 工作心得 培训心得 读后感 发言致辞 发言稿 开业开幕 领导讲话 动员讲话 庆典致辞 节日致词 新春致词 晚会致辞 追悼悼词 节目游戏 毕业致辞 思想宣传 组织人事 晚会主持词 会议主持词 婚礼主持词 哮喘 支气管炎 气管炎 鼻炎 肺癌 呼吸机 氧气机
Posted by: fdsaf | November 10, 2007 at 03:48 AM
hmmm. Handsome, witty, dutiful.....
========================
Posted by: kim | November 10, 2007 at 02:51 PM