Bill Clinton continues to "help" Hillary:
Former President Bill Clinton said Monday that the first thing his wife Hillary will do when she reaches the White House is dispatch him and his predecessor, President George H.W. Bush, on an around-the-world mission to repair the damage done to America's reputation by the current president — Bush's son, George W. Bush.
"Well, the first thing she intends to do, because you can do this without passing a bill, the first thing she intends to do is to send me and former President Bush and a number of other people around the world to tell them that America is open for business and cooperation again," Clinton said in response to a question from a supporter about what his wife's "number one priority" would be as president.
Maybe the notion that Hillary can bring two former Presidents together would be appealing in the general election. But seriously - how many Democratic primary voters are pining for a return to the national stage of Bush 41?
That is setting aside the obvious question of whether Bush 41 is fully on board with this "Let's Bury 43" tour.
UPDATE: OK, "41" nixes the idea:
In a statement sent to CNN Tuesday afternoon, former President Bush’s chief of staff Jean Becker said that he “wholeheartedly supports the President of the United States, including his foreign policy. He has never discussed an ‘around-the-world-mission’ with either former President Bill Clinton or Sen. Clinton, nor does he think such a mission is warranted since he is proud of the role America continues to play around the world as the beacon of hope for freedom and democracy.
“President Bush is excited about several of the excellent Republican candidates running for president, and looks forward to discussing their candidacy once the Republican nominee is determined.”
Too bad - I wanted to hear Bush 41 pledge to kick-start Kyoto. As if.
"Because Democrats Can't Get Enough Of Bush"
Presumably Hilary will be sending Bill round the world in search of this?
Posted by: Peter England | December 18, 2007 at 07:00 PM
How long can this guy continue to run his mouth like this? At least once a week he reminds the nation that he's not merely sloppy with the truth, he's absolutely reckless with it--or entirely indifferent to it. I defer to the guy's political acumen, but it's very hard for me to believe he's been a net positive for her in this campaign.
Posted by: Other Tom | December 18, 2007 at 07:53 PM
Hav a look over at Roer Simon's blog, where he contemplates (and I abet him contemplating) the possibility that Bill is subconsciously sabotaging Hillary's candidacy.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | December 18, 2007 at 07:58 PM
I think CNN got the original quote from Bill wrong.
What he probably said was that Hillary planned to dispatch him to places around the world to tell them that the Lincoln Bedroom is open for business again.
Posted by: Shad | December 18, 2007 at 07:59 PM
I think Bill is jealous that Sarko's wife dumped him, and he's free to go to EuroDisney with his new">http://maxgeraci.blog.kataweb.it/files/photos/uncategorized/bruni2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://maxgeraci.blog.kataweb.it/maxgeracidj/2007/02/&h=632&w=588&sz=81&hl=en&start=4&tbnid=Foc2n_LWcTai-M:&tbnh=137&tbnw=127&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dcarla%2Bbruni%26gbv%3D2%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DG">new squeeze.
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | December 18, 2007 at 08:09 PM
When I first heard what Bubba said, I laughed. It is ludicrous to think that Bush 41 would go around bad mouthing his son to support a President Hillary. I had only 2 questions: How long will it take for GHWB to issue a statement of denial and what did Barbara Bush throw at the TV screen when she heard?
I cannot believe that anyone would believe such nonsense.
Posted by: Sara | December 18, 2007 at 08:19 PM
That girl Hillary is certainly an international uniter Tamil Tigers raise funds for Clinton New Jersey Campaign
Posted by: Peter England | December 18, 2007 at 08:40 PM
Calling King Juan Carlos of Spain:
You told Hugo Chavez to shut up, can you PUH-LEEZE tell Bubba to do the same?
I, and many other Americans, will gratefully say, "Muchisimas gracias."
Posted by: MarkJ | December 18, 2007 at 09:01 PM
Calling King Juan Carlos of Spain:
You told Hugo Chavez to shut up, can you PUH-LEEZE tell Bubba to do the same?
I, and many other Americans, will gratefully say, "Muchisimas gracias."
Posted by: MarkJ | December 18, 2007 at 09:02 PM
Bush already issued the denial saying that the world was doing just fine, he never spoke to Bill or Hill and he was proud of what his son has accomplished.
No link, I think I heard it on Fox.
Posted by: Jane | December 18, 2007 at 09:46 PM
What will it be tomorrow, Bill?
Hillary, please don't muzzle your husband, he's providing endless hours of entertainment in an otherwise boring campaign.
I didn't believe those who said that Bill was trying to sabotage her run for the White House a couple of months ago.
Hmmmmmm.....
Posted by: Elroy Jetson | December 18, 2007 at 09:48 PM
"...dispatch his predecessor, President George H.W. Bush, on an around-the-world mission to repair the damage done to America's reputation by the current president — Bush's son, George W. Bush."
That is rich. Where is Dana Carvey when you need him? "Not gonna do it! Wouldn't be prudent!"
Posted by: MikeH | December 18, 2007 at 10:15 PM
OK, look: I'm sorry to keep posting Tradesports stuff. I know I vowed to do it at most once a week until after Labor Day next year. So sue me.
The Shrieking Banshee is now at 55.5 to get the nomination. Has her recent decline from 73 just a matter of weeks ago set some sort of world indoor record? Outdoor?
Wasn't she somewhere in the 58's just 48 hours ago?
And what does it all mean?
Posted by: Other Tom | December 18, 2007 at 10:24 PM
What does it mean? You should know; you're the one who pointed out it hadn't moved from 73 for weeks just before the slide started. Have OT and Bill Clinton been seen in the same place?
==============================
Posted by: kim | December 18, 2007 at 10:28 PM
Kim, I don't know why the fact that I previously pointed out that it hadn't moved indicates that I should know, any more than the fact that I'm now pointing out that it has indeed moved. In both cases, I simply don't know.
In a technical, put-your-money-where-your-mouth-is sense, I do know. But I've always been skeptical about the predictive value of these futures-trading numbers. It does seem that, when election eve rolls around, the numbers turn out to be pretty close to the final election numbers--as close as most of the opinion polls.
As far as I can tell, what it means at this moment is that people who have put a few bucks on her winning the nomination are now trying to hedge, and are cutting their losses. Some number of people who paid 73 cents for a contract that would pay a dollar should she win are now willing to take 55 cents to bail out.
But what does that all mean...?
Posted by: Other Tom | December 18, 2007 at 10:42 PM
Question for Senator Edwards, either at a debate, or from Tim Russert, or from whomever:
"Senator, you have of course denied that this woman is now carrying your child. If it should turn out that she delivers a baby whose DNA establishes that you are the father, would you immediately withdraw as a candidate on the ground that we are not entitled to believe what you say? A simple yes or no will suffice, Senator."
Posted by: Other Tom | December 18, 2007 at 10:45 PM
Peter England -
" 'Because Democrats Can't Get Enough Of Bush'
Presumably Hilary will be sending Bill round the world in search of this?"
I would think she'd prefer to do it herself.
Posted by: coolpapa | December 18, 2007 at 10:54 PM
We could spend the rest of the evening making up suggestions for further Bill pronouncements to help Hill.
PUK, take it away...Soylent.
OT, quit always looking for the deeper meaning in things, Work with PUK to figure out how we can cleanup on the Hill-a-copter of death.
Posted by: clarice | December 18, 2007 at 11:00 PM
I googled your Edwards query, OT. I hadn't heard about that new development. Very interesting.
Posted by: Porchlight | December 18, 2007 at 11:11 PM
"Take it from me I'm her husband,Hillary is the best man for the job".
Posted by: Peter England | December 18, 2007 at 11:16 PM
On the way home from Christmas shopping today, I heard that Hill shead a tear on the campaign trail today. Has anyone heard about this?
I don't believe that she actually has tears so I am fascinated if it happened and why. Has anyone heard anything about this?
Posted by: Ann | December 18, 2007 at 11:18 PM
Oops, I'm behind, I see the Edwards thing already appeared in another thread. Just when you think the campaign's getting a little boring...
Posted by: Porchlight | December 18, 2007 at 11:24 PM
Clarice calls and like Lassie I come running...
Possible new Bubba campaign themes:
"Don't forget Black America: As your first African American President, my wife is running, but I'm still passing."
"Vote for Hillary. Because I'm worth it."
"Vote for eight more years of reasons to buy the National Enquirer."
"Hill and Bill: Bringing the class and grace of Arkansas to Washington and the world."
Posted by: Soylent Red | December 19, 2007 at 12:11 AM
Bravo! You never let us down.
BTW yesterday was the anniversary of his impeachment.
Posted by: clarice | December 19, 2007 at 12:15 AM
The idea that Bubba is trying to sink Hillary is not totally unreasonable. This guys ego is so big he very likely hates the idea of Hill being President and him an old relic hanging on to her skirt.
Posted by: edward cropper | December 19, 2007 at 12:21 AM
The idea that Bubba is trying to sink Hillary is not totally unreasonable. This guys ego is so big he very likely hates the idea of Hill being President and him an old relic hanging on to her skirt.
Posted by: edward cropper | December 19, 2007 at 12:22 AM
Hey all...
I'm about to go dark for Christmas travel. In case I don't come back online before...
Merry Generic Midwinter Holiday Celebrating the Deity, Deities, or Life Affirming Force of Your Choice.
And a Happy and Prosperous New Year!
I predict a lot of fun in the upcoming months...
Posted by: Soylent Red | December 19, 2007 at 12:24 AM
Smooches to you, Soylent. I hope you are getting to spend Xmas with your family. If so, give your cute dad a hug from me, pls.
Posted by: clarice | December 19, 2007 at 12:27 AM
Hah, OT; just amused at your perspicacity at noting market breaks.
===================================
Posted by: kim | December 19, 2007 at 06:25 AM
"This guys ego is so big he very likely hates the idea of Hill being President and him an old relic hanging on to her skirt."
Plus the fact that he hates her guts,theirs was a marriage of conveyance.
Posted by: Peter England | December 19, 2007 at 07:11 AM
This is an old story and possibly a canard, but my understanding is that he was leering at her across a room in the Yale Law Library, and she called his bluff. Amazingly explanatory, if true.
==================================
Posted by: kim | December 19, 2007 at 07:20 AM
Marriage seems an extreme sort of "bluff calling".
Posted by: Peter England | December 19, 2007 at 12:05 PM
Soylent,
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
Sue
Posted by: Sue | December 19, 2007 at 12:22 PM
I agree, PUK..Maybe she's not much of a poker player.
Posted by: the poster formerly known as c | December 19, 2007 at 12:25 PM
I'd like to tell the American people,as the husband of Hillary Clinton , former highly successful President in my own right,I will be behind her all the way.
Posted by: Peter England | December 19, 2007 at 01:07 PM
the poster formerly known as c,
But which one lost?
Posted by: Peter England | December 19, 2007 at 01:09 PM
It's me PUK--had to change my moniker to post before.
Posted by: clarice | December 19, 2007 at 01:31 PM
To quote W S Churchill.
A woman is just a woman,but a cigar is a good smoke.I'm sure voters can appreciate that.
Posted by: Bill's Cigar | December 19, 2007 at 02:21 PM
To resemble AB, a marriage consists of a social arrangement with a master, a mistress and two slaves, consisting in all, two.
These two are inextricably and mortally bound to each other. They represent marvelous political acumen clasped to sociopathy; truly a folie a deux.
=============
Posted by: kim | December 19, 2007 at 02:34 PM
Hey,don't forget about me.
Posted by: Bill's Cigar | December 19, 2007 at 03:14 PM
More proof Hill thinks the voters are morons.
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/another-faked-photo-op-by-hillary>She's smiling because she thinks we're all so stupid
Posted by: clarice | December 19, 2007 at 03:18 PM
Hecck, the comments are crazy to get into - did TM crank up the firewall?
Posted by: secrettopk9 | December 19, 2007 at 03:20 PM
Posted by: cathyf | December 20, 2007 at 05:05 PM