Dan Bartlett displayed yet again the smooth interface between the White House communications team and the blogosphere with this Texas Monthly interview:
Q: Yeah, or what if [conservative blogger] Hugh Hewitt called?
A: That’s when you start going, “Hmm . . .” Because they do reach people who are influential.
Q: Well, they reach the president’s base.
A: That’s what I mean by influential. I mean, talk about a direct IV into the vein of your support. It’s a very efficient way to communicate. They regurgitate exactly and put up on their blogs what you said to them. It is something that we’ve cultivated and have really tried to put quite a bit of focus on.
The National Journal rounds up the response:
Liberal bloggers are giddy and their conservative rivals are defensive over the news that the Bush White House sees conservative blogs as an extension of the Republican message machine.
Interesting. If Bartlett means that he was able to rely on righty bloggers to post transcripts and exact quotes, thereby circumventing the MSM filter, well, yes, one would hope so.
If he means that righty bloggers were broadly sympathetic to the goals of the Administration, well, no kidding.
But if he means that the White House could expect an uncritical acceptance of their latest pronouncements, well, how did that work with Harriet Miers, just for example? Or perhaps we can ask Mr. Bartlett to recap Bush's triumphal march through the right wing blogosphere with his signing of McCain-Feingold, or the Dubai port deal, or his recent push for immigration reform?
Oh, well - presumably this left-wing gloating is simply a manifestation of the latest Townhouse talking point. But let's savor this moment of the pot's discovery of the kettle's color:
Conservatives do love to be told what to say. Saves them the hassle of having to think for themselves.
That comes from the Mighty Kos himself, purveyor of the biggest IV drip around - a quick glance at the Daily Kos finds among their diarists John Kerry, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, and no doubt more.
I would say that could be described as regurgitating exactly what the candidate wants to say.
NO DOUBT: The "Prominent Contributors" list at Wikipedia includes Ted Kennedy, Wesley Clark, Conyers, Boxer, Durbin, Feingold, Waxman, Carter, and John Edwards.
But Kos does not provide a house organ. Hardly.
Just in case anyone here didn't think Bartlett--surely Ari's source,not Libby--was an ass.
Posted by: clarice | December 06, 2007 at 12:49 PM
Better to be a tool than a fool.
=================
Posted by: kim | December 06, 2007 at 12:49 PM
Yeah, I was thinking of Townhouse too.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | December 06, 2007 at 12:51 PM
Bartlett's precisely bass ackwards, by the way. He doesn't realize this administration is just a tool of the Dextrosphere. Master Rove arranged it that way.
===================
Posted by: kim | December 06, 2007 at 12:53 PM
Didn't they say Joshua Micah was angling for Press Secretary in a Kerry administration?
=============
Posted by: kim | December 06, 2007 at 01:01 PM
Not entirely off topic: Robert Tracinski has a good piece on the NIE:
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | December 06, 2007 at 01:01 PM
Woah! Has Danny Glover turned into Kos's personal PR blogger? 7 of the 12 stories at the National Journal link are either directly about Kos, or mention him.
Posted by: MayBee | December 06, 2007 at 01:18 PM
You note Tracinski drew a direct comparison between the disinformation campaign of this NIE and the disinformation campaign that is the Summary for Policymakers in the IPCC's 4th Report on Climate Change.
Lies are being told for the sake of politics with the foreknowledge that the narrative will be supported in the press.
Hey, I just found out Maurice Strong is big in AGW. What is it with that dude?
OT, but Earl Hep has an elegant explanation for how the sun interacts with the earth to change climate. He developed it from observing grapevines grow in Australia, and the wonderful fruit of his curiosity is on display in the late 400's on the Svalgaard thread at climateaudit.org.
===============================
Posted by: kim | December 06, 2007 at 01:27 PM
Omigod, Erl Happ. Well, I'd barely heard of him before today.
==============================
Posted by: kim | December 06, 2007 at 01:31 PM
Maurice Strong is a Soros puppet,Kim, and AGW is yet another way for Soros to impoverish the hated middle class.
Posted by: clarice | December 06, 2007 at 01:37 PM
Mud Wrestling Alert
From Steynonline.com:
On the air
THREE HOUR STEYNORAMA!
On Thursday, Mark guest-hosts for Hugh Hewitt and talks Mitt, Huck, Iran, Sudan and the rest of the news, coast to coast at 6pm Eastern/3pm Pacific
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2007 at 01:43 PM
Mark Steyn reads my Email!!!!
I emailed him in response to his post on the Corner about the divorce-hurts-the-environment story...and he quoted me:
Yet, he has still never responded to my challenge, nor did he respond when I followed up based on this post.
In any event, my follow up was after some inordinate amount of beer, and now that I look back at the email I see it contained a lot of capital letters and exclamation points, so, more than anything, it's comforting to know I wasn't put on his blocked email list.
Whoa....
::light bulb pops up above head::
What if I called into the Hugh Hewitt show tonight?
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2007 at 01:46 PM
Three hours! I'm afraid my old heart cannot take that.
Posted by: clarice | December 06, 2007 at 01:46 PM
Encumbering carbon with unnecessary taxes will grind the poor more than anyone else.
=================================
Posted by: kim | December 06, 2007 at 02:05 PM
You gotta read this:
NYT Editor: 'We Have a War Going Very Badly in Iraq'
Posted by: Ann | December 06, 2007 at 02:07 PM
HIT--------I heart you so.Shacking up carbon credits. Something only you could have dreamed up.
Posted by: clarice | December 06, 2007 at 02:12 PM
Oh, and did you know that Barbara Walters Honors Pelosi as 2006's 'Most Fascinating'
Is it a full moon? I am still laughing. (story also at newsbusters)
Posted by: Ann | December 06, 2007 at 02:14 PM
KOS and Wikipedia have something in common with Joe Wilson.
A Crazy Worldwide Hanukkah Party!!!!!
Posted by: ACrazyWorldwideHanukkahParty!!!!! | December 06, 2007 at 02:19 PM
Ooh, I like "intemperate television shout shows". That has a ring like a temple gong to it.
===============================
Posted by: kim | December 06, 2007 at 02:26 PM
Since Tom brought up Texas Monthly, let me just say that I have a fun story...(fun for me anyway)
I was chaplain at the YMCA of the Rockies at Snow Mountain Ranch (near Winter Park, CO) like 15 years ago.
One of my "official" job responsibilities during the week was to just "hang out" and interact with staff and guests. Fun stuff.
So, most evenings after dinner I would hang out in the lobby, chat with the front desk workers, make conversation with guests as they came by, helped out when I could or whatever else was going on.
So, one night this guy comes in, he and 3 kids, ages 2, 5 and 10. He says that he and another family each had a Suburban going on one of the four wheel drive roads up behind the resort -- and they got one of the vehicles stuck. He came back down with the kids, but the other couple and his wife were up with the other vehicle.
He needed to be pulled out.
We had maintenance folks who could do the job. But, he also needed someone to look after the kids while he led the maintenance folks up to the spot of the stuck Suburban.
That's a job for ME!!!
[typepad doesn't like where this is going, so I'll try and break this up into two posts...]
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2007 at 02:29 PM
[Continued]
So, off they went and off I went with the kids to the cabin. We played games, I fed them some dinner. After a while, I put the 2 year old to bed. Then the 5 year old. Then I hung out with the 10 year old for a while. We started chatting...the usual stuff, where are you from, what grade are you in, what does your dad do for a living...
"He writes and teaches"
"Writes what, teaches where?"
"He writes for some magazine, he teaches at the University of Texas."
"Really, my brother goes to Texas. What does he teach?"
"I don't know, politics or government or something"
"Ah, political science, I suppose. Um, let me fathom a guess, because this is really weird, my brother said one of his professors might be coming here this summer -- he writes for Texas Monthly and your last name is Burka."
"Yes"
"Is your dad's name Paul Burka?"
"Yes."
It's a small world...
...but I wouldn't want to paint it.
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2007 at 02:29 PM
Somehow it's even harder to picture you as a chaplain than it is to picture you babysitting. But I bet you were good at it.
Posted by: clarice | December 06, 2007 at 02:36 PM
I think Snow Mountain Ranch was where I learned that Texans, even with 4X4's, had no idea about slick, sloped, roads, but it was more like a third of a century ago. Emerald Mountain was the place to be 80-100 years ago.
===========================================
Posted by: kim | December 06, 2007 at 02:48 PM
There is a significant difference between being a stenographer for someone else and between allowing them to write their piece with their own name as the author.
Posted by: Pete | December 06, 2007 at 02:49 PM
Burka's take is interesting. I suspect a deal, too; between Abdullah and the Mullahs.
==================
Posted by: kim | December 06, 2007 at 02:51 PM
Struck at Ramadan after Sistani and the Surge stymied Amadi-Nijad.
==========================================
Posted by: kim | December 06, 2007 at 02:56 PM
Hit,
What do you think of what Burka says in that blog entry?
Posted by: Jane | December 06, 2007 at 02:58 PM
OT - but kim's reference above is linked below. It is a long, scientific discussion with around 500 posts, but if you only read one, post #470 is a great analysis/summary.
Even though there are "solar" skeptics to Global Warming in the thread (as if), the thread itself pretty much makes AGW irrelevant... as kim says "we're cooling"
Posted by: Bill in AZ | December 06, 2007 at 03:04 PM
My take on that Burka post?
I'm ignorant. The NIE itself is over my head -- meaning, there are so many other people with so much more experience and insight that I fear even criticizing grammatical errors.
But, I am skeptical generally of the NIE now vs 2005 vs 2002 vs whatever.
The NIE seems to me to be a political football...more than a true, objective, and dare I say it, "reality-based" intelligence assessment.
Er, I mean, there's an extraneous comman in there.
somewhere.
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2007 at 03:21 PM
Clarice,
Chaplain,chalice,communion wine.
Posted by: PeterUK | December 06, 2007 at 03:25 PM
"...direct IV into the vein"?
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2007 at 03:32 PM
Got it,PUK.Makes perfect sense.
Posted by: clarice | December 06, 2007 at 03:33 PM
Hit,
IMO there are two schools of thought on the NIE thing: First, Iran folded up its nuclear program when we went into Iraq - much like Lybia.
The second: The NIE guys are perpetuating the same anti Bush bias to the loss of our safety. They want to make sure attacking Iran is not an option. After all, Enrichment is the hard part, so the fact that they have stopped the rest of the process is a joke.
Stratfor adds a third hypothesis. It seems more palatable. I'm not sure how to think about it tho.
Posted by: Jane | December 06, 2007 at 03:35 PM
Maybe we're pulling a trick--telling Iran it stopped its production and just waiting for Imasmadasahatter to say,"Did not".HEH
Posted by: clarice | December 06, 2007 at 03:40 PM
Clarice,
Do you remember when they were celebrating on the streets in Tehran that they were going to have nukes? Maybe it is a ploy to make the people of Iran think their leaders lied to them. I think I'm reaching here, but why else would Dick Cheney agree with the NIE?
Posted by: Sue | December 06, 2007 at 03:58 PM
t's a mystery..Maybe Iowahawk can figure it out.
Posted by: clarice | December 06, 2007 at 04:01 PM
Was it written by anti-Bush nutjobs? That's what I've read.
Was it released without Bush's approval? I don't know.
Could the nutjobs have set out to ambush Bush, but then upon reading it, Bush says, "I can use this"?
(Bush = anyone in his admin in such a position to do so, not him personally.)
I don't know.
I miss Rove being in the admin. Sure was nice being able to just say, "Rove did this, and he has all things under control, according to his grand design". I miss the leftys thinking that too, of course.
Which is why, I'll again refer to my take on Rove's departing words.....
"If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine."
And, unreality-based or not, I am fine working hard to make leftys think that's what's going on.
LATE BREAKING: Sue, I am fine having them think that Dick is doing this as well...although the Rove-as-Obi Wan reference breaks down in the face of Darth Cheney...
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2007 at 04:04 PM
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016227.php>The Captain thinks Dick Cheney lent credibility to the truthfulness of the report. I am not quite there yet, either, but I think there is something up. Dick Cheney never agrees with the intelligence community. On anything.
Posted by: Sue | December 06, 2007 at 04:14 PM
Ok so the example brought up to Bartlett is Hugh Hewitt and the first issue TM chooses to use is Harriet Miers? Ouch, might want to reconsider that one.
Posted by: dwightkschrute | December 06, 2007 at 04:16 PM
Kim,
You are so right. About 15 years ago I had a contract working in Dallas. They had a snow and ice storm one night with a brief dusting and some slick spots. I got up in the morning and by going slow got to work without even slipping. One other person made it in to work - a consultant based in Denver. The entire rest of the staff stayed home. It was just too dangerous to drive for them.
The couple of cars I saw on the road thought that if you got stuck, the best thing to do was just gun the engine and spin your tires until you got back to the surface. Unbelievable.
I took pity on one of the women who was going home from the night shift because she was just spinning the tires in the lot. I got in and just eased the pedal and drove it right out for her. She was amazed.
Posted by: dick | December 06, 2007 at 04:50 PM
Kim,
You are so right. About 15 years ago I had a contract working in Dallas. They had a snow and ice storm one night with a brief dusting and some slick spots. I got up in the morning and by going slow got to work without even slipping. One other person made it in to work - a consultant based in Denver. The entire rest of the staff stayed home. It was just too dangerous to drive for them.
The couple of cars I saw on the road thought that if you got stuck, the best thing to do was just gun the engine and spin your tires until you got back to the surface. Unbelievable.
I took pity on one of the women who was going home from the night shift because she was just spinning the tires in the lot. I got in and just eased the pedal and drove it right out for her. She was amazed.
Posted by: dick | December 06, 2007 at 04:51 PM
Kim,
You are so right. About 15 years ago I had a contract working in Dallas. They had a snow and ice storm one night with a brief dusting and some slick spots. I got up in the morning and by going slow got to work without even slipping. One other person made it in to work - a consultant based in Denver. The entire rest of the staff stayed home. It was just too dangerous to drive for them.
The couple of cars I saw on the road thought that if you got stuck, the best thing to do was just gun the engine and spin your tires until you got back to the surface. Unbelievable.
I took pity on one of the women who was going home from the night shift because she was just spinning the tires in the lot. I got in and just eased the pedal and drove it right out for her. She was amazed.
Posted by: dick | December 06, 2007 at 04:51 PM
the best thing to do was just gun the engine and spin your tires
Well the most dangerous thing that Dallas drivers do in snow and ice conditions is actually hitting their brakes. Never trained to pump their brakes and no training about release in a skid and steering into the skid to correct, they just panic and lock em up.
Makes the Dallas fwys a very dangerous place to be, even if you know how to drive in the conditions. Thus the smart ones stay home.
One good thing about those conditions here, they are very temporary. A day or so and the roads will be clear again for another 5 years or more!
Posted by: GMax | December 06, 2007 at 04:58 PM
Boy, do we have you northerners fooled. Think about it. Who was working and who had a "snow" day?
::grin::
whistling as I walk away
Posted by: Sue | December 06, 2007 at 05:00 PM
Cheney essentially said nothing, but John Bolton weighs in:
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | December 06, 2007 at 05:05 PM
I think Iran decided to put its nuclear weapons on hold the day the Israelis leveled that suspicious plant in Syria that is thought to have been for the production of nuclear weapons. I think that was an Iranian sponsored facility. It was started in 2001, well on its way by 2003, so why take a chance of having bombs drop on Iran, when their Syrian satellite could take the heat.
Posted by: Sara | December 06, 2007 at 05:38 PM
As to who can think critically or only toes the party line, I have to say that I've not met anyone on the left who thinks critically.
They seem to be divided between conspiracy nuts, those who think this is the America of the Great Depression of the '30s, or those who are cases of arrested development circa 1968.
Posted by: Sara | December 06, 2007 at 05:41 PM
toes = tows
Posted by: Sara | December 06, 2007 at 05:43 PM
oh, but those Democrats love the cheeeeldrn
Lamest Congress Ever.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1207/7248.html
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | December 06, 2007 at 05:45 PM
I call foul. My DirectTV is out, relatively speaking. All channels, including local, are out with the exception of: all the shopping channels, CSPAN, but not CSPANII or III, BET, TBN, BYU, and some weird channel that I haven't quite figured out. The weirdest of all, the other 3 TVs hooked up to satellite are all working and getting all the channels, so it seems to be only the box hooked up to my TV that can't acquire the signal. Apparently the fates believe I need to shop, worship at the feet of Nancy Pelosi, or sing hallelujah, or support "black power."
Posted by: Sara | December 06, 2007 at 06:17 PM
Ah, the things you discover when you are desperate. The weird channel turned out to be the audio of oral argument at the Supreme Court on the Guantanamo case. Very interesting, now that I understand what is going on.
Posted by: Sara | December 06, 2007 at 06:22 PM
The overevaluation of the data might be all the CIA analysts Congress had the Directors(x airforce)move from CIA to DoD(NSA/DIA).
I don't think Bush or Cheney are using Americans for some intelligence operations. That's for Plame and Ames. That's how the London bombing happened.
I have never dealt with the Pokemon village of "intelligence."
Don't panic about the carni nightmares.
Great minds like a think:
Bill Gates doesn't know 'The Economist' is British intelligence.
The name came up in an internet search for a bomb in a city.
Posted by: ACrazyWorldwideHanukkahParty!!!!! | December 06, 2007 at 06:38 PM
More at the link here
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | December 06, 2007 at 06:48 PM
Just damn,ts!
Posted by: clarice | December 06, 2007 at 06:55 PM
Vince Cannistrano would tell us she was just worried about her family AND her friends.
Posted by: MayBee | December 06, 2007 at 07:18 PM
this was on November 26, 2007, before this tidbit about the CIA knowing about her problems...
http://www.fcw.com/online/news/150876-1.html
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | December 06, 2007 at 07:20 PM
Jarch Capital’s Sudanese Gambit
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | December 06, 2007 at 07:43 PM
Tops ... I am on pins and needles here!!!
Bigger one forthcoming?
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2007 at 07:53 PM
And before anyone accuses me of asking of others what I am unwilling to do myself...may I remind you...
I'm the one in the middle.
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2007 at 07:54 PM
Oh, and if that last one's not good enough?
Fine.
I'm the one on the left.
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2007 at 07:55 PM
OT but interesting information concerning NIE - The Times Cheney was briefed on intelligence - conversations between disenchanted Iranian personnel complaining the project to develop nuclear weapons had been stopped.
Understandable,since in 2003 there was a very and heavily armed armed force next door.
Posted by: PeterUK | December 06, 2007 at 07:59 PM
Foreign born vetting is not knew. They discontinued some of it because of the discrmination. They will use it to discriminate again.
TSK9 isn't a female.
Posted by: ACrazyWorldwideHanukkahParty!!!!! | December 06, 2007 at 08:07 PM
Saw the picture. It's the Herman working like Val before getting hired by the CIA.
Posted by: ACrazyWorldwideHanukkahParty!!!!! | December 06, 2007 at 08:16 PM
OK Hit.., but my only regret is that I have to be a generic brunette.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | December 06, 2007 at 08:29 PM
You just made my weekend.
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2007 at 08:44 PM
I leave for five minutes and Hit's got ts playing I'll show me mine if you show me yours.Jeesh
Posted by: clarice | December 06, 2007 at 08:48 PM
The King article can be purchased online from the LAT archives if you want. It was first published there in April 1993
Here's an excerpt:
[quote]
Los Angeles Times (pre-1997 Fulltext) - Los Angeles, Calif.
Author: Florence King
Date: Apr 4, 1993
Start Page: 38
Section: Los Angeles Times Magazine; Times Magazine Desk
Text Word Count: 2290
Abstract (Document Summary)
Tennessee Williams did not exaggerate. The South is Big Daddy country. The psychological dominance practiced by ole Colonel Portnoy, who seduces with bourbon instead of chicken soup, is why the South is full of middle-aged men holding forth in curiously whining voices about "what my Daddy said." Daughters are equally susceptible to our drawling Agamemnons. Margaret Mitchell could not keep her fingers off those magic keys, f-a-t-h-e-r, giving us not one but two Electra-fying father-daughter relationships: Gerald and Scarlett O'Hara and Rhett and Bonnie Butler.
As [Hillary Rodham Clinton], she will drag [Bill Clinton] into the same nomenclatural bedlam already occupied by First Friends Harry Thomason and Linda Bloodworth-Thomason. You can't call them Mr. and Mrs. Bloodworth-Thomason because he's not a Bloodworth and she's more than a Thomason. Nor can you call them Mr. and Mrs. Thomason because there is no Mrs. Thomason.[/quote]
http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/60228723.html?dids=60228723:60228723&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Apr+4%2C+1993&author=Florence+King&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&edition=&startpage=38&desc=jus%27+what+kind+of+good+ole+boy+is+president+billy%3F>Clinton
Posted by: clarice | December 06, 2007 at 09:10 PM
but my only regret is that I have to be a generic brunette.
hah hah hah hah!!
I like your fabric more than I like their jaguar, though!
Cute you!
Posted by: MayBee | December 06, 2007 at 09:14 PM
I dunno, tsk9, that is one heck of a moth hole!
Posted by: cathyf | December 06, 2007 at 09:54 PM
Sara, you were right the first time with "toe the line." You've been "in" the Navy too long.
Posted by: Ralph L | December 06, 2007 at 10:01 PM
Ralph! Hey, took mrs hit and run to RDU today. Didn't quite go "through" your town, but did decide to take the back roads back to mine. Went through Gibsonville. 'Twas a lot of fun.
Oh, and if Gmax is here -- princess hit and run was with us and did mention "evoting" (her word, not realizing that voting online could be described as such) and Jmax upon seeing a Chapel Hill sign....
By the way, preview saved me here. Don't try and type "princess hit..." so fast that the last 's' on princess ends up attaching itself to hit....yikes.
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2007 at 10:30 PM
I think Snow Mountain Ranch was where I learned that Texans, even with 4X4's, had no idea about slick, sloped, roads, but it was more like a third of a century ago. Emerald Mountain was the place to be 80-100 years ago.
Texans are fun in the snow. We used to drive up and down I-25 at 25 mph, being passed by Texans driving 60. I-25 has several places where it turns for no apparent reason (actually following the Fountain River more or less.) We called them "Texan flypaper".
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | December 06, 2007 at 10:39 PM
OK, Charlie, you got me. We moved to Denver in the mid 90s. From Texas.
We drove back to Texas for a friend's wedding.
It was April. Big storm. We made it as far as Col Springs. Got a hotel, spent the night.
Woke up the next morning, the storm had passed, but it had dumped maybe 6-8 inches of snow.
So we headed south on I-25. Easy driving.
Was going probably 60. No problems.
Til I tried to pass one of you locals apparently, maybe it was you personally, going 25. The ruts in between the lanes grabbed the tires and ..... spin out.
No damage. Just embarrassement.
And, an hour later, going 60 again.
(then again, the storm didn't hit Pueblo or south anyway, so no more snow)
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2007 at 11:08 PM
Hit, What a small world. I spent some of my childhood in Raleigh, N.C. We moved north and I found the man of my dreams in Ohio; his family is from Martinsville and Collinsville.
It seems I was in your backyard a couple months ago. We always, always spend Christmas in Richmond, VA. Maybe, we could get Clarice to host a Christmas JOM Day. I will bring the beer. Just don't tell Jane!
Posted by: ann | December 06, 2007 at 11:18 PM
Thanks for the King cite, Clarice. Since your teaser a few weeks ago I've been looking forward to reading it.
I have access to the full text if you or anyone else would like it - just let me know where to send.
Thanks for the photos - y'all are all cute!
Posted by: Porchlight | December 06, 2007 at 11:26 PM
I'd love it, porchlight. Even though I ordered the book it won't be here for a week or more. Pls send to clarice.feldman@gmail.com
Posted by: clarice | December 06, 2007 at 11:28 PM
Ann, I remember you being in Martinsville.....
Martinsville holds some really fond memories of NASCAR races for me.
Well, not so much "memories" as pictorial representations of time I spent there that I cannot recall due to drinking non-stop beginning at 7am.
(I was there at the infamous NBC-staged-Muslim-dressed-looking-for-some-intolerance-but-couldn't-find-any race. Didn't see any Muslim dressed dudes....er, wait...I mean I wasn't photographed with any)
Good times.
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2007 at 11:33 PM
Should be in your inbox, Clarice. I'm off to savor it right now...
Posted by: Porchlight | December 06, 2007 at 11:42 PM
Got it.Thnx,porchlight.
Posted by: clarice | December 07, 2007 at 12:06 AM
Ann, I've offered asylum to the little Hits and Ms. but I'm afraid about alcohol addled chainsaw wielding Hit.
Posted by: clarice | December 07, 2007 at 12:08 AM
Clarice:
Ann, I've offered asylum to the little Hits and Ms.
Oh, gosh, you do realize that in taking mrs hit and run to the airport today...that she is in Texas ----> but the kids have stayed here with me!!!
We are ALL unsupervised!!!
Posted by: hit and run | December 07, 2007 at 12:35 AM
I'm getting an ice pack for my head and going to bed. Perchance to sleep after hearing that frightening news.
Posted by: clarice | December 07, 2007 at 12:47 AM
The kids are safely in bed, and I am heading to my own.
The neighborhood Christmas party is tomorrow night, but I am not going, choosing to stay home and hang with the kids.
Nothing to cause you distress. All is quiet. All is calm. All is bright. Round yon virgin...wait, where was I?
It's sleep in heavenly peace here....
Posted by: hit and run | December 07, 2007 at 12:54 AM
Not too many years ago, when you got to NC from Virginia, the snowplowing stopped, even on the interstates. Our snow is wetter and slicker than out west and New England's, so we have reason to be wary of it (and the other idiots on the road).
I drove to my brother's in CT for Thanks. on rt 29 and I-81, and on the way back, I missed a turn in Lynchburg and drove into Roanoke thinking it was Danville, adding 60 miles to a 670 mile trip.
Eden was a ghost town at 11:30 Saturday night (they must have been warned I was coming), and I saw most of it trying to find 87.
Posted by: Ralph L | December 07, 2007 at 01:13 AM
Sue,
They might have had a snow day but if I didn't work, I didn't get paid. No snow days for consultants.
Posted by: dick | December 07, 2007 at 01:15 AM
Sleep on heavenly peas, wake up a vegetable.
Posted by: Ralph L | December 07, 2007 at 01:16 AM
Hit and Run:
A day may come come when the reference to Star Wars fails, but it is not this day!
The parts may be up for debate, but they are certainly discussing their light sabers.
Speaking of Star Wars, have you seen this?
Posted by: Elliott | December 07, 2007 at 01:16 AM
So, did all our Plamaniacs see this from yesterday's Providence Journal (via memeorandum)?
Hope is alive and well over at Firedoglake!
Posted by: JM Hanes | December 07, 2007 at 01:40 AM
Can he do that?
Posted by: Sara | December 07, 2007 at 01:54 AM
Thanks for that, JMH. It's Fitzmas and all the libral uns must be assured that there is a Scandal Cloud.
If this lawyer Plame mentions was not employed by the OVP on Feb. 12, 2002, he or she probably works for Waxman's committee. If there are transcripts—my memory is quite hazy as to what, if any, special conditions applied to these interviews—and they eventually see the light of day, the worst case scenario I can imagine is that POTUS and DLOTUS (Dark Lord of the United States) had very advanced cases of Arkansas alzheimer's, which would only make Fitzgerald look like a complete tool of the administration. Hardly likely.
Posted by: Elliott | December 07, 2007 at 02:58 AM
"How could you tell? I had dark glasses on." Oh, the poor thing.
=====================================
Posted by: kim | December 07, 2007 at 06:38 AM
You know I can't help but think that history will show that Bush and Cheney single- handedly disarmed Iraq, Iran, No. Korea and Lybia while Congress spent all of their waking hours ( all 15 a week) trying to undermine everything they did, because apparently Waxman, Pelosi, Reid et al were either rooting for Hezbolla, Hamas and al Qaeda or were dumber than dirt.
This week a Bush skeptic commented to me that there was a chance that this president would end up regarded like Churchill. So just maybe his accomplishments are starting to sink in. As a result I expect the BDSers like Waxman to redouble their efforts.
I say "Bring it on"
Posted by: Jane | December 07, 2007 at 07:27 AM
Reagan and the Bushes bookending Bill Clinton is going to be a lesson for centuries.
======================================
Posted by: kim | December 07, 2007 at 07:37 AM
Oh, and raise a glass of Three Hills.
======================
Posted by: kim | December 07, 2007 at 07:38 AM
Jane,
No one could say it better than you just did. I say "Bring it On", too!
"How could you tell? I had dark glasses on." (What a buffoon)
Posted by: Ann | December 07, 2007 at 08:38 AM
CONSCIENCE CLEARING FULL DISCLOSURE: After a fitful night of sleep, I feel I must come clean. All of my comments above on this thread were talking points given to me by the White House, which I regurgitated word for word, without question.
I do not understand the message the White House is trying to get out with those talking points; but then, I'm not exactly being paid to think, let alone understand.
For which I am glad. Saves me the hassle of having to think for myself.
Posted by: hit and run | December 07, 2007 at 09:17 AM
I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE THINKING: No. The White House didn't give me the "come clean" talking point to regurgitate.
Nor is my denying that the "come clean" post is a WH talking point a WH talking point.
Cross my heart.
Posted by: hit and run | December 07, 2007 at 09:22 AM
Moon of my buffoon,
You pitiful daffodil.
Out, damned spy!
==============
Posted by: kim | December 07, 2007 at 09:24 AM
Hear, hear on the glass of Three Hills (well, maybe later, it's still early). Must be a slow news day, and while waiting for the next round of drought ending rain/snow here I'll make my pitch for Dec 6 as Erl Happ day - the day Al Gore and his AGW was shoved back under the rock. "We're cooling" is starting to get some attention over at Climate Audit (post 470).
Posted by: Bill in AZ | December 07, 2007 at 09:26 AM
Well said, Jane. These have been remarkable achievements which have to date been argely underplayed or ignored. He's playing for the history books not Bill Keller's approval.
Posted by: clarice | December 07, 2007 at 09:35 AM