Think about this - the probable next President of the United States does not know even the broad outlines of the history of American foreign policy from WWII forward and does not know the history of Democratic icons Roosevelt or Truman. We had kvetched about this earlier. The fateful quote from Barack's Tuesday victory speech is this:
"I trust the American people to understand that it is not weakness, but wisdom to talk not just to our friends, but to our enemies, like Roosevelt did, and Kennedy did, and Truman did."
Hope and change!
MORE: STALIN IT IS! Here is Obama at a March 27 2008 fundraiser:
"I think people understand the notion of talking to our enemies," Obama said. "If FDR can meet with Stalin and Nixon can meet with Mao and Kennedy can meet with Khrushchev and Reagan can meet with Gorbechav, then the notion that we can't meet with some half-baked dictator is ridiculous."
Well, Stalin was a fully-baked dictator, but he was also our ally against Nazi Germany when he met with Roosevelt. For a good example of "half-baked" we need look no further than Barack's proposed meeting with Ahmadinejad.
SOME BACKGROUND: Here is an account of the debate where this came up:
In the debate, Obama was asked if he would be willing to meet — without precondition — in the first year of his presidency with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea.
"I would," he responded.
Clinton said she would not.
"I don't want to be used for propaganda purposes," she said. Her campaign quickly posted video of her answer online, trying to show she has a different understanding of foreign policy than her chief rival.
RETURN TO SENDER: No, letters don't count (and I already had pointed out the Roosevelt-Hitler letter) - letters do not provide the sort of propaganda photo-op being criticized. Besides, Bush has sent a letter to Kim Jong Il, but where is the photo of the two of them shaking hands?
BRINGING IT TOGETHER: McCain wants to bash Obama on Hamas, and has criticized Obama's intention to confer legitimacy on the Iranian regime by meeting without preconditions. Well, if Obama is justifying that meeting by reference to historical parallels that exist only in the imaginations of himself and his speechwriters, that is troubling.
And having an Obama adviser caught chatting with Hamas is not helpful for Obama's cred, either.
EXPANDING THE ELECTORAL MAP: Set aside his evident deficiencies in American post-war history (Nooo, not the Vietnam war) and think about this - Obama is still hazy on how many states there are in the Union, not to mention the normally uncontroversial status of Alaska and Hawaii. Marc Ambinder has the video of Obama claiming that he has visited 57 states (Hmm, maybe he was sampling Heinz ketchups...). Obama made a similar whoopsie when chatting with the AP a few weeks ago - back then, he was talking about forty-eight states, plus Alaska and Hawaii.
I would tell him to check the flag in his lapel, but of course he won't be wearing one. [OK, maybe he did check his lapel pin...]
DOCTOR, DOCTOR, GIMME THE NEWS: MRI, stat:
This faux pas is beyond weird; I know the guy is tired, but “How many states are there in America?” is the kind of question they ask you at the hospital after you've had a seizure to see if your brain is still working.
Along the lines with "dropping a joint down his shorts" this may be where Brocko's brains are located.
Posted by: glasater | May 09, 2008 at 02:33 PM
I think Ranger made much the same points about Brock's knowledge of American history the other day.
Posted by: clarice | May 09, 2008 at 02:59 PM
Did Winston Churchill say, "Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it."? Or did somebody learn something wrong?
Posted by: ParseThis | May 09, 2008 at 03:01 PM
I hadn't heard about the Khrushchev belief that Americans are 'too liberal to fight.'
Posted by: Neo | May 09, 2008 at 03:31 PM
Scott at Powerline correctly attributes the quote to George Santayana.
Posted by: michaelt | May 09, 2008 at 03:45 PM
Although my link goes to the wrong post.....
Posted by: michaelt | May 09, 2008 at 03:47 PM
JFK & Vienna, Vienna, Vienna.
Not talking sausage either.
My guess is that Obama is so used to easily swimming in anti-American waters that he doesn't realize that there's a vastly different species of anti-Americanism in foreign waters.
Wright & Ayers et al. are not Ahmadinejad & Assad et al.
Posted by: SteveMG | May 09, 2008 at 04:27 PM
You could have a point. For Wright & Ayers anti-American is a form of "patriotism". Sneering at flag pin wearers is how they honor the country.
Posted by: boris | May 09, 2008 at 04:33 PM
This man is not simply a glib weasel, he is an ignoramus. Unfortunately, he is preaching to a choir the majority of whose members do not know in which century the US Civil War was fought. And there are precious few in the press who are able, let alone willing, to point out his errors.
Perhaps the country will at long last get what it deserves--good and hard.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 09, 2008 at 04:36 PM
For Wright & Ayers anti-American is a form of "patriotism". Sneering at flag pin wearers is how they honor the country.
Obama, maturing in such an environment (communist professors in college, anti-Americanism in Chicago et cetera), has developed a, let's say, cavalier attitude towards such expressions. Ho hum, I've heard it all before.
My guess - just a wild one - is that he views foreign anti-Americanism in a similar way.
Posted by: SteveMG | May 09, 2008 at 04:53 PM
In an article I linked to on another thread, a commenter left this, which is a good example of what a sad state historical reference is on the left:
Link
Posted by: Sara | May 09, 2008 at 05:11 PM
We don't know what Obama knows about our history, but we know his supporters don't have a clue; he's telling them what he thinks they want to hear.
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | May 09, 2008 at 05:49 PM
Unfortunately the education system abandoned the teaching of history decades ago. Few Americans have ever read the Declaration of Independence much less the Constitution. Fewer still can explain the difference between the colonists at Jamestown and Plymouth. Our education system has abandoned the concepts of knowledge in preference to feeling.
I hope I never have a brain surgeon who uses the feeling theory in place of hard facts.
Posted by: Thomas Jackson | May 09, 2008 at 05:51 PM
W, famous for his sense of humor, ought to announce that he's appointing Obama a special envoy to Myanmar. Where he could get some experience talking to our enemies, and see where it gets him:
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | May 09, 2008 at 06:00 PM
In view of this JOM post and others I've seen in the last few days around the blogosphere, I dug up an old post and have reposted it today.
It is Lt. Col. Frances Rice's Open Letter to the Democratic Party. Col. Rice is an African American woman who lays out the real history of the Dems with civil rights and race relations. It is well worth the re-read and as a reminder of how lacking in historical perspective the dems are and especially the Obama campaign.
Open Letter to the Democratic Party
Posted by: Sara | May 09, 2008 at 06:13 PM
Speaking of history, someone should ask Obama how he feels about reading history books:
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | May 09, 2008 at 06:26 PM
A pseudo-statement about what passes for liberalism and isn't:
Welcome to 2008.Posted by: sbw | May 09, 2008 at 06:45 PM
TM in the TAKE A STEP BACK:
Set aside his deficiencies in American post-war history (Nooo, not the Vietnam war) and think about this - Obama is still hazy on how many states there are in the Union ... I would tell him to check the flag in his lapel, but of course he won't be wearing one.
You're off here, TM.
Why do you think the flag is an immutable authority in its present state?
Obama can change that.
Change!
The flag!
The United States Flag Under President Barack Obama
Posted by: hit and run | May 09, 2008 at 06:58 PM
Oh brother-another advisor!
Posted by: RichatUF | May 09, 2008 at 07:17 PM
From Rich's link:
Neither did Wright hide his anti-American sermons.
But just like Wright, Malley doesn't get thrown under the bus until the relevant issue (in this case Hamas) becomes a matter of public controversy.
Obama: I denonce, renounce and announce my rejection and repudiation of [insert name here] because you think he's divisive and therefore he's distracting.
Posted by: hit and run | May 09, 2008 at 07:30 PM
Who needs all those messy stars when you can have just one? Now there is a pin Barak Hussein Obama could wear with pride.Ayers would be so pleased with his protege.
Posted by: PeterUK | May 09, 2008 at 07:32 PM
Careful, Rich. This is just another ruse to hide the deep subtlety and nuance of BHO's intellectual agility. It will do no good to suggest that the probability of al-Masri joining Hamas in supporting BHO is significantly above 50%.
He'll just pull the Viennese CurleyMoeLarry option and escape once more. He's that clever.
In reality - why should it be surprising that an unvetted, shallow popinjay of a jumped up jerk have unvetted loose cannon as advisors? It's not as if he has the first clue as to what the job he is pursuing actually entails.
Go BHO! And hope for change...
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 09, 2008 at 07:37 PM
I love the fact that Obama has these various and sundry advisory councils, but apparently no formal advisors. Obama can distance himself from the unsavory by dismissing such persons from their informal post. Does he plan on running his administration with informal advisors?
Posted by: Forbes | May 09, 2008 at 08:38 PM
My guess is that he does know the history but considers the talking to be the part that got the job done.
The bomb, not so much.
Posted by: qrstuv | May 09, 2008 at 08:39 PM
Hit--a good all purpose I renounce________form on O stationery should be a welcome thing to his campaign--It'll save a lot of time over the coming months.
Posted by: clarice | May 09, 2008 at 08:42 PM
Forbes, he is the messiah, doncha' know? Why would he need advisers. He is the smartest guy in the whole wide world, just ask him.
Posted by: Sara | May 09, 2008 at 08:47 PM
Or better yet, ask Michelle how her husband will make you believe what he thinks you should believe and act the way they decree. Very red shirt/brown shirt and very indicative of their elitist attitude.
Posted by: Sara | May 09, 2008 at 08:48 PM
Obama does need a snappy disclaimer on his notepaper.HE'S SPARTACUS !
Posted by: PeterUK | May 09, 2008 at 08:57 PM
Heh, clarice -- and I'm thinking there should be a page on barackobama.com that let's you enter the name and issue that distracts you -- and you get your very own personalized Obama denunciation.
Obama -- campaign
comes to mind for me...
I'm so very distracted by it.
Posted by: hit and run | May 09, 2008 at 09:00 PM
Rick:
It's not as if he has the first clue as to what the job he is pursuing actually entails.
Feh.
The U.S. is just basically one big community.
In need of a community orgainizer.
You know who's the most experienced community organizer in the race?
Yup. Exactly.
Posted by: hit and run | May 09, 2008 at 09:14 PM
Well, guys, we all must be suffering some kind of memory loss. The United States no longer has 50 states, Obama says so, so it must be true. He claims he has visited 57 states and has a couple more to go.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws
Posted by: Sara | May 09, 2008 at 09:16 PM
One thing from that clip, Sara, is that Obama says:
"...Alaska and Hawaii I was not allowed to go to, even though I really wanted to visit, but my staff would not justify it..."
Well. That's a pretty pathetic 99% of the voting shares he wields on campaign decisions, huh.
Posted by: hit and run | May 09, 2008 at 09:40 PM
It's really a Johnny Smith, "Dead Zone" type insight, He's been to the future where Cuba, P. Rico, Alberta, Quebec, Monterey, &
Sinaloa, Ontario are US states. "Clearly" in
a Tony Stark accent. Because he wouldn't make such a mistake. Only the 'Smirking Chimp" who happens to be the scion of a long standing family; could make that mistake.
Barry seems to be echoing nothing less than Gaius Baltar, from Battle Star Galactica as the educated elitist from an minor colony;(Sagitaron, I recalls) who bears a chip on his shoulder, for precisely that reason. He ultimately betrays humanity, because he trusts too much in the false promises on an implacable foe. At the end of Season 2; he ends up President, because the most
responsible officials who should have prevented him from seizing power,(Adama & Roslin were too ethical to fix an election)
A bizarre spin on the whole chad recount fracas. Consequently, when the enemy came, the humans were forced into the pyrrhic campaign of suicide bombers; due to the infinite regeneration of the enemy. That was the point, that was deliberately elided
in Season 3. The writers were so captivated
by the Iraq analogy; that they missed the point.
The Malley,Powers,McPeak,Cirincione,Ayers,
circle of allies, clearly illustrate this problem.
Posted by: narciso | May 09, 2008 at 09:43 PM
Y'know, we have all heard about Michelle's failing SAT scores. Anybody know what Big O's were?
I think he is exhibiting signs of early Alzheimer's, and at such a young age. So sad!
Posted by: centralcal | May 09, 2008 at 09:48 PM
The idea is to keep adding stars until the flag is white all over. Then he can wear the pin without shame.
Posted by: Paul Zrimsek | May 09, 2008 at 10:03 PM
So tell me again, just who is it who has lost his bearings?
Posted by: Sara | May 09, 2008 at 10:09 PM
"The U.S. is just basically one big co
mmunityllective.In need of a comm
unity orgainizerissar.H & R,
Maybe we should call him the Disowner rather than the Decider? Perhaps that's where his 99.9% vote comes in. Just to show everyone that he has The Wright Stuff.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 09, 2008 at 10:22 PM
I just watched a movie about Jane Austen and loved the fact that they called foolish men a "booby". I think we should transfer this to Obama's campaign. OBAMA A BOOBY or A BOOBY OBAMA.
Catchy, Dontchathink!
Does anyone here really think Hillary would take the VP slot?
(Priority Two)
Isn't she still in this because she knows Obama is a booby and by August they will be begging her for the coronation.
(Priority One)
Posted by: Ann | May 09, 2008 at 10:25 PM
Some in the audience swooned upon His revelation of Our 57 States.
Others wept quietly.
T-shirt sales were brisk....
Posted by: GnuCarSmell | May 09, 2008 at 10:27 PM
Kvetchers. Miss the plague on the train? Someone died and a bunch of people got sick, but there is nothing wrong. I'm always seeing or is that looking or is that hearing; so why do Canadians think it's a conspiracy?
I thought Adama used(seeing) and that's why there was all the death, hearing, pylons trying to kill them and other bad things. Satan UFOd some nylons and they are really humans in perfection before lucifer damned. The creation of the UFO isn't an issue because it isn't human in perfection as lucifer's creation a perversion of God. Why would humans kill themselves killing what they were when they cylons have infinite creation? They are upset at the perfection of what they were and the inability to cease being this?
Burma has enough employees to get the work done. The foreigners aren't needed. We should give Burma the 1.1 billion UN Food Program surplus needed for 'pensions'.
Foreign policies is votes, right?
Posted by: ved | May 09, 2008 at 10:34 PM
Suitably Flip introduces the new custom Obama flag pin
Posted by: Sara | May 09, 2008 at 10:40 PM
Well, at least we can be thankful that B57O was a law professor and not an elementary school geography teacher.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | May 09, 2008 at 10:51 PM
I wonder whether Obama drew the 57 from the number of contests the Democrats have? There are 54 listed here. Michigan and Florida aren't listed there because at present they don't have any delegates. If we count Texas as two contests that would bring us to 57.
If Obama hasn't been to Hawaii, though, I find it hard to believe he's been to Guam or American Samoa, so that part of his statement still doesn't make sense.
Is he turning Democrats Abroad, a ragtag bunch scattered across the globe, into a state, and thus making an unprecedented and undiplomatic claim of American power? Probably not, it's just
wordsManifest Inanity.Posted by: Elliott | May 09, 2008 at 10:53 PM
"Quick, someone shut down the random phrase generator" What the heck was that?
Posted by: narciso | May 09, 2008 at 10:57 PM
Did Winston Churchill say, "Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it."? Or did somebody learn something wrong?
I assumed (hoped?) that the writer was making a joke at Obama's expense by so baldly misattributing a famous quotation. It was George Santayana who said that.
Posted by: jimmyk | May 09, 2008 at 10:58 PM
Rick:
Maybe we should call him the Disowner rather than the Decider?
Well, I've laid claim to the phrase the "disownership society" as it relates to Obama.
It's mine.
Google it!
Posted by: hit and run | May 09, 2008 at 11:06 PM
Ann,
I just watched a movie about Jane Austen and loved
Oh I love, love, love Jane Austen! And she even wrote a letter to her niece backwards when she was young!
I'd mud wrestle for her, even today.
Posted by: hit and run | May 09, 2008 at 11:09 PM
Hit ,
Are you saying you would only mud wrestle for Jane?
I am so discouraged! How about you, Clarice? :)
Posted by: Ann | May 09, 2008 at 11:23 PM
Elliott:
I wonder whether Obama drew the 57 from the number of contests the Democrats have?
Oh, I'll be the first to admit that he meant 47.
He had one more to go -- 48. Plus he hadn't been to HI or AK.....50.
He said "fifty" because he
likes the rap music of Curtis James Jackson IIIhe was thinking 50 total states before caluclating which he had visited or not ... but his mind was way ahead of his lips. By the time his lips got to the idea that he had one more state to visit plus AK and HI, the fifty was past and gone.It was a slip -- not evidence of some ignorance of how many states are actually in the US.
But I am more than willing to be divisive and a distraction in letting those who wish to believe he is that dumb believe that he is that dumb.
Because the next time he speaks extemporaneously without the teleprompter -- he will likely give evidence to support the idea that he is that dumb.
And let's be honest. A couple of more beers and I will be making similar Obamaesque gaffes. Especially when I reach the point of "preview is for sissies"...
Posted by: hit and run | May 09, 2008 at 11:23 PM
Having to remember the number of states is a 'distraction.' Let him eat his waffles and his 'cue with the Heinz 57. For a thin boy, he sure gets into his food.
Posted by: michael | May 09, 2008 at 11:25 PM
Ann:
Are you saying you would only mud wrestle for Jane?
I am so discouraged! How about you, Clarice?
Oh, no. No, no, no!
I'd mud wrestle for you, Clarice, the JOM Jane, and about two dozen other JOM commenters, males include. And especially including the host himself.
I am secure enough in my manhood to say that (and not so drunk that I will regret it!).
And, well, let's be honestly honest -- if any FEMALES want to challenge me on this, well, I'll accept the mud wrestling challenge without question. Bring. It. On.
WAIT...did I say that out loud.
[VIMH: Preview is for sissies, eh?]
Eh, you're a sissy. I stand by it!
Posted by: hit and run | May 09, 2008 at 11:30 PM
Via the Instapundit, I see that Dean Barnett beat me to the hegemonic implications.
Posted by: Elliott | May 09, 2008 at 11:45 PM
And she even wrote a letter to her niece backwards when she was young
One of my great skills in life is that I can write in cursive backwards without even thinking about it. It's awsome because then you can read it in a mirror.
Other people have less useful talents like dancing, singing, and writing coherently, but that is mine and I embrace it.
Posted by: MayBee | May 10, 2008 at 12:02 AM
Elliott: Did you see the other article at your link above? ARG poll: Clinton 66%, Obama 23%.
Hillary Ahead in West Virginia...by 43 Points
Posted by: Sara | May 10, 2008 at 12:13 AM
MayBee:
One of my great skills in life is that I can write in cursive backwards without even thinking about it. It's awsome because then you can read it in a mirror.
Other people have less useful talents like dancing, singing, and writing coherently, but that is mine and I embrace it.
Swoon!!!!
MayBee, I love you. I'd mud wrestle for you. If you've been to you know where, you'll know why.
Posted by: hit and run | May 10, 2008 at 12:20 AM
"One of my great skills in life is that I can write in cursive backwards without even thinking about it."
Good grief, MayBee. I can no longer write cursive at all. Computer typing has replaced that skill. And when I could write cursive, only I could read it.
Nice skill...
Posted by: Barry | May 10, 2008 at 12:22 AM
Speaking about Not Knowing Much About History, what say we have a competition this weekend to name the extra 7 or 8 states of the US of A that Obama says he's already visited this campaign. The video's on Drudge, Instapundit, etc. (Sorry I can't link to it). Even my 10 year old said, "Unbelievable...He's the guy trying to be our new President?"
Posted by: Daddy | May 10, 2008 at 12:28 AM
Oh, Hit! I just saw it. Hilarious! We'd have to mudwrestle backwards.
The downside for me is that I see the backwards PUSH sign on a glass door and just push. It doesn't register that it is backwards and I should, you know, pull.
Barry, ha! My husband and children have a hybrid writing style that I'm not sure anyone can read, including them.
Posted by: MayBee | May 10, 2008 at 12:51 AM
MayBee:
Oh, Hit! I just saw it. Hilarious! We'd have to mudwrestle backwards.
Oooooh, I was ready to mudwrestle for you.
But if you want to mudwrestle with/against me, I'm going to need a time and place.
Of your chosing. And I'm there!
As long as it's after 11:00 tomorrow. I've got kids soccer until then.
Oh, and I have to be back by 5. We've got a "grandparents shower" at 6 to go to for friends in our supper club.
We could push this to Sunday -- but church starts at 10:30 and gets out after noon.
And our small group meets at 6.
But other than that -- my schedule is wide open. You name the time and place!!!
Posted by: hit and run | May 10, 2008 at 01:07 AM
Gotta love Joe!
"I just want to report that this morning I personally checked John McCain’s bearings. He has not lost any of them. They are all in really great shape."
Posted by: Sara | May 10, 2008 at 01:46 AM
Jay Cost was wondering last week whether people are truly prepared for such a convincing Clinton victory. It should be interesting.
On an unrelated note, is everyone aware of the fate that has befallen The Very Important Hair?
Posted by: Elliott | May 10, 2008 at 02:46 AM
Posted by: Sara | May 10, 2008 at 03:11 AM
How can anyone doubt Obama's intelligence? After all, he has visited 57 states and has one or two more to go.
Posted by: BarbaraS | May 10, 2008 at 03:28 AM
off!!
Posted by: Sara | May 10, 2008 at 03:29 AM
Only Obama has the vision to realize that where there's an Indiana there must also be a Cowboya in the neighborhood. Likewise, the existence of Kansas and Arkansas clearly implies Ararkansas, if not Arararkansas. Compare the size of present-day Louisiana to that of the Louisiana Purchase; could the rest of it have been cut off so dramatically if not for Robespierriana? While I suppose you could have a Maine without a Backuppe, I wouldn't recommend it. And you'd think East Virginia, Old Hampshire, Old Jersey, Old Mexico, Old York, and Maxxesota would be obvious to anyone.
Posted by: Paul Zrimsek | May 10, 2008 at 05:20 AM
Thanks for the link, Elliott. Joe looks like he couldn't have said his piece without a teleprompter.
============================
Posted by: kim | May 10, 2008 at 05:29 AM
Paul, if there is a Coloradio there has to be a Colortelevision around here somewhere.
=============================
Posted by: kim | May 10, 2008 at 05:35 AM
Are you saying you would only mud wrestle for Jane?
Perhaps this thread should have stopped right there!
Good Morning peeps. I see Obama has continued with the self-humiliation since I last sailed these shores. Perhaps that is why the sun is shining so brightly.
Posted by: Jane | May 10, 2008 at 07:40 AM
Of course Obamessiah is going to sit down with sinners,prostitutes and tax gatherers,that is his ministry.
He is a uniter,hence the broad church.
Posted by: PeterUK | May 10, 2008 at 07:46 AM
One of my great skills in life is that I can write in cursive backwards without even thinking about it. It's awsome because then you can read it in a mirror.
Other people have less useful talents like dancing, singing, and writing coherently, but that is mine and I embrace it.
OMG. It is my only talent too. I don't need the mirror to read it. You probably don't either. Awesome.
Posted by: Sue | May 10, 2008 at 07:59 AM
One of my great skills in life is that I can write in cursive backwards without even thinking about it. It's awsome because then you can read it in a mirror.
Other people have less useful talents like dancing, singing, and writing coherently, but that is mine and I embrace it.
OMG. It is my only talent too. I don't need the mirror to read it. You probably don't either. Awesome.
Posted by: Sue | May 10, 2008 at 07:59 AM
I am starting to wonder about Barry O -- can't remember how many states we have, or what month it is, or how many more months till the election.
*They* say he is smoking again. Cigarettes? Something else? Just asking?
Posted by: centralcal | May 10, 2008 at 09:28 AM
Why are so many twits cluttering up this page with drivel about mirror writing? Really, who gives a rat's patoot?
If those questions are too difficult, perhaps someone can tell me why anybody says that Obama is intelligent. Intellectually, he strikes me as a moderately promising 20 year old. That is to say, essentially ingnorant about damn near everything. But he's not 20 - not even close. Whatever has he done with his brain in the last quarter century? Simply let it lie fallow? What was that jingle about "a mind is a terrible thing to waste"?
Posted by: tom swift | May 10, 2008 at 09:33 AM
Obama can't wear a flag pin; Ayers would be stomping on his chest all the time.
Posted by: Chester White | May 10, 2008 at 09:41 AM
Clutter is in the mind of the beholder, my friend. I'm getting insight into the mind of Da Vinci. But you have a great point about a wasted mind. Supposedly this dude is supposed to magnificent at vacuuming up stuff and processing it. Why does what comes out of his mouth seem like such waste?
==============================
Posted by: kim | May 10, 2008 at 09:46 AM
Don't changes syntaxes in midstream of thought. It's sort of like talking while swallowing.
===================
Posted by: kim | May 10, 2008 at 09:48 AM
Ha ha... yeah, they said Reagan was dumb, too. Two-term, vice-president coattails Reagan.
I hope you like tidal waves because one is headed your way this fall!
Posted by: franglo | May 10, 2008 at 09:49 AM
Chester, (Larry?), we love you.
==================
Posted by: kim | May 10, 2008 at 09:49 AM
Just wondering .. it wasn't too long ago that we had an Obama advisor talking with the Canadians.
Perhaps, in a move to negate to "bad effects" of NAFTA, Obama has plans to annex 7 of the 10 Canadian provinces as states.
I've often heard that if Quebec ever gets autonomy, then Manitoba and Saskatchewan want to become US states.
Posted by: Neo | May 10, 2008 at 09:54 AM
I hope you like tidal waves because one is headed your way this fall!
Something else to blame on global warming.
Posted by: Sue | May 10, 2008 at 09:56 AM
Elliott,
Whatever happened to the Plames? They look horrible. I wonder if it is the reality of another wasted 4 years picking the wrong candidate to support? ::grin::
Posted by: Sue | May 10, 2008 at 09:57 AM
Senator Obama ia addicted to narcotics. Nicotine to be exact. Just like a junkie, his brain will not function without it. If he was just someone who smoked a few cigarettes daily, he would be at a different level of addict but he is a heavy smoker and is being denied his drug of choice. No President since LBJ has smoked cigarettes as a habit and having known LBJ, I can tell you he was not a flustered if he could not smoke. Senator Obama is effected by withdrawal though and quite a bit.
This comment isn't bush league bullcrap or meant to be flippant in any way, it is scientific fact. I can say categorically that heavy smokers make poor workers at any level within an organization. I have worked for decades on complex and sensitive projects for our space and defense programs and the top minds are never heavy smokers.
Posted by: Beto Ochoa | May 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM
I'm pretty sure that “Frank” set Obama straight on Stalin.
Posted by: Neo | May 10, 2008 at 10:04 AM
Karl at PW has another good post up on the Disowner.
"Empty suit" may be too kind a description for BHO.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 10, 2008 at 10:16 AM
You watch, Lieberman for McCain's Veep. Novak has it that Joltin' Joe asked a Clinton supporter to back McCain.
===========================
Posted by: kim | May 10, 2008 at 11:02 AM
Maybe we should call him 'Jilted Joe'. He's going to speak at the Republican National Convention.
======================
Posted by: kim | May 10, 2008 at 11:03 AM
Lieberman for McCain's Veep
It would be a cool move and it probably would win. If "conservatives" desert it might be a close win but with their support it could be the kind of landslide that discredits the hateful left for a generation.
Don't see it actually happening though.
Posted by: boris | May 10, 2008 at 11:40 AM
If the voters put Obama in the White House,
we won't clinging to hope, we'll be
clinging to straws.
Posted by: MaggieW | May 10, 2008 at 11:45 AM
How can anyone doubt Obama's intelligence? After all, he has visited 57 states and has one or two more to go.
BarbaraS:
I think Obama is correct..if you add the Ivy league schools to the total, that would be 58 states plus count Illinois twice ( they always vote twice anyway )
So yea.. he's got a couple more states to visit...
Posted by: HoosierHoops | May 10, 2008 at 12:07 PM
Elliott:
Normally, I prefer text to the videos & podcasts which proliferate these days, but the Wilson">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/09/video-eleventh-hour-blockbuster-endorsement-rescues-hillarys-campaign/">Wilson ad is a must see! In fact, it's worthy of a "Special Comment" from TM himself. The Wilsons' world ends, not with a bang. They are clearly going down with the Clinton ship, but a lot of other folks in Washington must be scuttling about, deck chairs in tow, looking to reposition themselves on the USS Obama. Over at HotAir, someone said that the Wilson's civil suit is revving up again. Has anybody here seen any news on that front?
I was fascinated to read that the National Security Archive recently "filed suit to obtain grand jury records related to Julius and Ethel Rosenberg." I would expect that request to be denied and wonder if they are already working on their appeal, which could be interesting. There's certainly a case to be made for unsealing historic grand jury proceedings over time.
I can't imagine that the Libby grand jury proceedings would ever see the light day during our lifetimes, but after reading the Post article, I started wondering about filing FOIA requests for documents from -- and about -- the Special Prosecution. Given the uniqueness of the circumstances, perhaps one could question whether the standard "work product" rules apply when so many other rules appear to have been suspended in that process. Libby's decision not to appeal his case left all of my most serious concerns -- which had nothing to do with his actual guilt or innocence -- unaddressed.
I've heard rumblings elsewhere on the subject of prosecutors' immunities. IIRC, they were not connected to the Duke lacrosse players' suit, so I believe the numbers of people who are growing uneasy about prosecutorial accountability in general may be on the rise. Though some may not care for the implications, it's ironic that the folks who wanted to burn Bush for politicizing US Attorney appointments and the folks who wanted to burn his Justice Department for Fitzgerald's appointment ended up in opposition to each other. Unfortunately, such divisions mean that despite a potentially favorable climate, there has been virtually zero interest in fashioning the necessary legislative correctives.
Posted by: JM Hanes | May 10, 2008 at 12:13 PM
Actually those folks looking to the letters may want to re-think that given the nature of some of the pre-WWII letters and dispatches sent. For example, the FDR letter to the Czech and German Nations in 1938 which would come just on the eve of the annexation of the Sudetenland. Yes FDR points out to the lovely treaties involved that *all* should abide by... in signing away Czech territory. Then, after Germany had taken the Czech republic, FDR sent a note to Hitler and Mussolini about how three sovereign nations had disappeared recently! The good old FDR wanted *assurances* that they wouldn't attack a long list of countries. He was even willing to sponsor Global Free Trade Talks! Hey, now *thats* something that would surprise many Democrats today, wouldn't it? Yes those lovely diplomatic letters worked out so well for a world of peace and freedom, no? And before that, looking Goldberg's Liberal Fascism (p. 147) we see congratulatory message from Hitler to FDR on "his heroic effortsin the interests of the American People. The President's successful battle against economic distress is being followed by the entire German people with interest and admiration."
Hard to call that period from 1933-34 to even the eve of WWII exactly *hostile* or that Hitler and FDR were 'enemies'. It is only after the war started did Hitler start up his anti-US propaganda. Right up to the eve of it he had a perfectly acceptable relationship with someone willing to do anything to avoid war... save confront Germany.
Posted by: ajacksonian | May 10, 2008 at 12:31 PM
"Obama can't wear a flag pin; Ayers would be stomping on his chest all the time."
HEH
Posted by: ben | May 10, 2008 at 12:50 PM
The Wilson's simply argued the appeal of the dismissal of their caes JMH. Nothing new and I doubt it will succeed.
I agree with you that prosecutorial overreach needs some close attention and isn't getting it.
It is unlikely the g j proceedings of the Libby case will ever be opened in our lifetimes though. I see Wilson cut his hair..Hmm
Posted by: clarice | May 10, 2008 at 01:05 PM
Clarice:
I contemplated a Valerie as Delilah post but just couldn't make it work. The Wilson endorsement looks more like a hostage video than an ad.
Posted by: JM Hanes | May 10, 2008 at 01:15 PM
HEH,jmh.
They both seem to be the worse for wear, don't they?
Posted by: clarice | May 10, 2008 at 01:27 PM
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/05/the-ticket-has.html#more>Hilarious information about a certain couple endorsing a certain candidate, via the LA Times.
Posted by: MayBee | May 10, 2008 at 01:42 PM
I contemplated a Valerie as Delilah post but just couldn't make it work.
I had the same thought, but it was Hillary as Delilah.
Then I thought Wilson must have been lousy.
Posted by: MayBee | May 10, 2008 at 02:02 PM
Lieberman for McCain's Veep
I second that.
Posted by: Neo | May 10, 2008 at 02:18 PM
This election can be viewed as a Senate putsch. Might as well get the big boys in.
==============
Posted by: kim | May 10, 2008 at 02:25 PM
The problem with that theory, Kim, is that they're not putting forth any proposal. You want a windfall tax (god help us, that's nearly as stupid, as the Smoot Hawley and Ford Macumber tariffs) but put it in a bill
see how many co-sponsors you get. Hillary, you're really serious about a gas tax holiday, put it up. McCain has less of a chance; but that's never stopped him from
McCain/Feingold, McCain/Lieberman, (on global warming)McCain/Kennedy (on illegal
immigration) McCain/Durbin (on aggressive
interrogation of AQ terrorists). On second thought, remind mewhy we're voting for him again?
Posted by: narciso | May 10, 2008 at 02:32 PM