Powered by TypePad

« Good News From Basra | Main | A Helpful Matt Bai Skipper »

May 15, 2008

Comments

Thomas Collins

Truman had the formulation and beginning of the implementation of the Strategy of Containment, Ike had Covert Operations Diplomacy, JFK had a Bear Any Burden Foreign Policy, Reagan had the Struggle Against the Evil Empire Strategy, and B57O will have his "Sweetie Talk" Diplomacy sessions with Raul Castro, Hamas, et al!

Danube of Thought

Is it worth pointing out that neither Kennedy nor Reagan ever negotiated with anyone with whom we were at war, and that Nixon did so with North Vietnam only because he perceived the war as one not worth fighting anymore?

Actually, I suppose the answer to my rhetorical question is probably "no."

Neo

Does this mean that Obama is ready to "negotiate with terrorists and radicals". Reagan, Kennedy and Nixon negotiated with nations.

Is Obama saying that Iran is full of "terrorists and radicals" or is a nation of "terrorists and radicals" ?

Bringing in Reagan is folly on Obama's part. Does this open the door for the return of North and Poindexter ? Is "arms for hostages" acceptable again ?

Neo

Does Obama have "a cake and a Bible" ready ?

cathyf
Is it worth pointing out that neither Kennedy nor Reagan ever negotiated with anyone with whom we were at war, and that Nixon did so with North Vietnam only because he perceived the war as one not worth fighting anymore?
I think Nixon is quite appropriate an example. Nixon was negotiating our surrender -- is that what Obama is proposing to do?
Danube of Thought

I'm prepared to entertain the hope that the Young Messiah has opened up a real can of worms for himself here. I think McCain, for all the many disagreements I have with him, is extremely well-versed on diplomatic and military history, and Obama clearly is not. I sense an opening...

Neo
And as long as Obama's borrowing phraseology from other politicians, we're surprised he hasn't paraphrased the words of the late William Borah, whom he rivals in naivete.

On hearing of the Nazi invasion of Poland in 1939, the
Idaho senator lamented: "Lord, if only I could have
talked with Hitler, all this might have been avoided."

Ah, if only Barack had been able to talk with Saddam . . .

hit and run

This hasn't already been posted on another thread has it?

Because I, I --oh hahaha heheeeheeeh hohohhoohooooooooboy -- can't stop laughing.

From inside MSNBC we hear Gregory and Olbermann kicked off a feud of their own while ankling last night’s West Virgina primary coverage. In fact, viewers may have witnessed it.

Around 10pm, you might’ve heard a very loud thud, followed by Gregory abruptly wrapping up his panel discussion.

According to witnesses, that thud was Olbermann slamming his fist down on his desk (he was in one studio with Chris Matthews), because he felt Gregory and his panel, in another area, were going on way too long, and nobody was telling him to wrap it up.

Another MSNBC host thinking Gregory is getting too much time in front of the camera? Uh oh.

“As awkward as it was on the air, the fight off-air was really intense and uncomfortable,” says a source.

Gregory got pissed. “Infuriated” at Olbermann’s public behavior, he ripped into producers about the incident, and then headed to Phil Griffin to retell the injustice.

It remains unclear whether Griffin then had a talking to with Olbermann.

That thud you just heard was me falling to the floor.

JM Hanes

Obama may have hit the history books, but what he really needs is Logic 101. As an antidote to "tough talk and no action," he proposes "tough, principled, and direct diplomacy." Hearing a Democrat complain about no action certainly breaks new ground, and the way Obama talks about direct diplomacy and hammering folks like Canada on NAFTA, you'd almost think we've got a budding unilaterist on our hands.

Unfortunately, according to the NYTimes above, it looks like the secret weapon in Obama's arsenal of American power will apparently be his (auto!)biography:

“I think,” he said, in that deep and measured voice of his, “that if you can tell people, ‘We have a president in the White House who still has a grandmother living in a hut on the shores of Lake Victoria and has a sister who’s half-Indonesian, married to a Chinese-Canadian,’ then they’re going to think that he may have a better sense of what’s going on in our lives and in our country. And they’d be right.”

If Bush was talking about Obama, he was being kind. The man simply makes no sense at all.

Danube of Thought

God, what great fun! This Olbermann guy is truly full of himself, isn't he?

clarice

And Gregory isn't full of himself?

centralcal

Sooner or later one of these bozos - Olberman, Matthews, Gregory, Maddow - are going to truly flip out on air. Wonder if any of them carry concealed?

Rick Ballard

VIMH interprets the narrative for Neville BHO and the NYT.

(I suggest rereading the excellent quote furnished by JMH closely prior to digging into Jeff's piece. Spending a few hours with Derrida and Foucalt wouldn't hurt either.)

LindaK

Look, if Obama was so good at "tough, principled and direct diplomacy" how come Hillary's still in the race?

Seems to me that RW is an easier prospect for mediation than A'jad. A few kind words, a $21mm check and a speaking slot at the convention in prime time and she's out of his hair.

mkultra

Christ. Bush hands over Iraq to the mullahs, encourages Hamas to participate in the Palestinian elections, and it's Obama with the problem?

Gawd.

Pagar

"Christ. Bush hands over Iraq to the mullahs, encourages Hamas to participate in the Palestinian elections, and it's Obama with the problem?"
How many taerrorists say they are supporting Bush?

Pagar

taerrorists = terrorists

Cecil Turner

Bush hands over Iraq to the mullahs . . .

Well, guess that doesn't really qualify as "clueless about history" . . . just not up on current events.

And yeah, Obamba-the-younger has a problem, and it's just like the man said:

"Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along."

clarice

Good point.Linda.

RichatUF

Rick-

Spending a few hours with Derrida and Foucalt wouldn't hurt either.

Deferred meaning and power/knowledge...maybe it is a good time for a drink. Stunned that they would elevate the speech to an election year controversy (much like Bush's VFW speech late last year) and mark themselves clearly with the pre-WWII appeassment label.

What is BHO going to campaign on-that HISH isn't designed around an elminationist anti-semitism, and when we negotiated with and ignored it last time millions were murdered. He thinks somehow this time its going to be different, or maybe he is hoping for more.

Terry Gain

Obama is going to convince Iran to stop being the world's major supporter of terrorism by, among other tough diplomatic measures, conceding Iraq to Iran?

Moronic.

hit and run

I don't what the rest of you say behind his back, Rick you are a good man.

mkultra

'Well, guess that doesn't really qualify as "clueless about history" . . . just not up on current events.'

The new right wing talking point is that Maliki is playing the mullahs. The WSJ floated it a couple of days ago.

THAT qualifies as clueless about history and current events. While Saddam was battling it out with the mullahs in the 80's, Maliki was vacationing in Tehran on Khomeni's nickel.

And isn't it funny that Bush invokes the Nazis a day before new info is revealed about how his Grandad was doing business with the Krauts all the way into '42. Timing really isn't his thing, is it?

Peter

I cannot let it stand that Nixon was negogiating surrender in Viet Nam. God, if they only taught history anymore. The truth is that we finally had that war won.
after all those years of LBJ not allowing our planes to bomb an outhouse without his OK Nixon turned the war over to the professional. By the time we were negotiating with the North, we had pulled our ground troops out and the South Viets were pushing the remnants of the NVA back. Then the Democrats in Congress stopped all aid, including the air and naval forces we were required, by treaty to provide. Congress also stopped all materiel so the South Viets had no ammunition, especially artillery shells.
The Democrats started that war, the Republicans won it and then the Democrats jerked victory away. Much like the war we are in. Remember, in 1998 it became official United States policy that we have regime change in Iraq. Poor Bush, he was dumb enough to believe that. And, as usual with Democrats, now that we finally have both AlQ and Sadr on the run, the Democrats are voting to lose, again.
Natually, since the Democrats own the media and the schools it will be another case of the Donks saving the world. But those of us who were there know.

Cecil Turner

While Saddam was battling it out with the mullahs in the 80's, Maliki was vacationing in Tehran on Khomeni's nickel.

It takes a certain flexibility of mind to argue simultaneously that the US is turning over Iraq to Iran, but Obambi would make it all better by pulling out and negotiating. Neither point is terribly persuasive, however.

hit and run

And isn't it funny that Bush invokes the Nazis a day before new info is revealed about how his Grandad was doing business with the Krauts all the way into '42. Timing really isn't his thing, is it?

Is that more or less relevant than the fact that Obama's daddy was a Muslim?

Cecil Turner
PeterUK

United States entered World War Two on December 8, 1941,after Germany and Italy declared war.My,that is a long way off 1942.

Rick Ballard

Rich,

Clarice has intimated that BHO's intelligence may be somewhat lower than I would expect of someone who had made the Harvard Law Review. I'm beginning to swing around to that assessment, based primarily upon the utter incoherence of his nonscripted statements. It's as if he has a chip running one of these implanted to handle response generation.

I'm sticking with 2/21 as his apogee. The wax melted and the wings have been shedding feathers ever since.

clarice

The slander about the Bush family has been disproved for decades but still lives in the lefty netherworld, which seems nevertheless to continue to ignore the irrefutable evidence of Joe Kennedy's footsie playing with the Nazis.

kim

That's the astonishing thing, Rick; his apogee was three months ago and still, with the press blowing a favorable wind, he's continues to bury Hillary. I worry; the sick MSM may thrash in its agony and really be fundamentally destructive.
===========================

kim

Clarice, it's amusing and ironic to listen to today's analogues of Nazi sympathizers sneer at Nazis. Wait'll they stop sneering.
======================

RichatUF

Rick-

HEH...I remember that link from somewhere else however, maybe over at pw.

Anyway, I'm stunned that the BHO campaign would go into overdrive on a statement of historic fact, which Rumsfeld included in a previous speech as well.

I wonder how loudly BHO is going to complain when Israel bombs the Beruit Airport (crater the runways so planes can't take off or land), when they go back into Gaza to dig out Hamas, and launch operations to dig out Hezbollah missles in Lebanon. One wonders if his brain trust realizes that the situation that Israel is faced with now is a direct result of the type of policy that Obama claims would bring "peace" to the region (hell the US has been the handmaiden for a good deal of it) and what he claims will be our policy in Iraq during his administration.

Israel negotiated in good faith with Arafat for a "comprehensive settlement" and it failed. They just picked up and left southern Lebanon and Gaza-without preconditions-and have been attacked constantly ever since.

BHO thinks just because he is our magical "Other" that he is going to move an eliminationist anti-semitic regime, which loves death more than life, and has been forged by the Basij child murderers during the Iran-Iraq War. BHO really is delusional, no wonder he was so offended by Bush's speech today.

Rick Ballard

Rich,

I think he is in a bit of a panic because of the Hamas endorsement and the Pali phone banks. I'm not in charge of meme generation but I believe the next logical step would be to tie high gas prices to the muslim members of OPEC acting on his behalf.

I wonder if we could get an endorsement out of OPEC's Secretary General? As a demonstration of BHO's ability to "bridge the gulf with the Other"? Of course, an endorsement followed by a price cut wouldn't be good news for McCain.

JM Hanes

Rick: Derrida, Foucalt, and Communications from Elsewhere -- too perfect! LOLOLOL!

clarice

Boris, that's not so weird. IIRC OBL virtually endorsed Kerry last time around and stole extensively from Michael Moore.

Rick, why don't we start a 527:Jihadis for Osama..and call voters all around the country at inconvenient times ostensibly from the ME.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Wilson/Plame