While splashing about in the tank for Obama Joe Klein penned this on July 23:
The reality is that neither Barack Obama nor Nouri al-Maliki nor most anybody else believes that the Iraq war can be "lost" at this point.
Who knew that Obama's view of Iraq was so bouyant? Not readers of TIME, who were told this by Joe Klein waaaay back on July 20:
For McCain, the first priority remains a stable Iraqi nation-state, and he is willing to risk ever more American blood and treasure over the coming years in that quest. For Obama, the first priority is an exit from the country, and he is willing to risk civil chaos in Iraq and a loss of American influence in the region.
So over the last three days, Obama has gone from being willing to accept an Iraqi civil war to believing that the war cannot be "lost". Three days abroad make all the difference!
But I remain puzzled - would Barack consider a civil war a "loss"? Would Maliki? Or is Klein just blowing smoke?
Didn't you get the memo? There is no war in Iraq.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | July 23, 2008 at 09:17 PM
That's some wayyyy back machine--three whole days, huh?
Posted by: clarice | July 23, 2008 at 09:20 PM
Klein is in a one-man civil war with himself.
And losing.
Posted by: hit and run | July 23, 2008 at 09:22 PM
More like this one please!
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 23, 2008 at 09:34 PM
Blowing smoke? Man I see a chain smoker skilled in the art of smoke rings. In the same week? No wonder he likes Obama, they both change on a hat drop!
Posted by: GMax | July 23, 2008 at 09:44 PM
Klein v Klein
Too bad Sydney Pollack just died. He could have one Klein as a messy, dopey, (I think I need a Yiddish word here) and the other as a short-tempered, dismissive Lesbianish type arguing with eachother over Iraq.
Posted by: Lesley | July 23, 2008 at 09:50 PM
I think I need a Yiddish word here
meshuggah.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | July 23, 2008 at 09:52 PM
Lee, pardon me for leaping ahead without reading all you wrote (I'll go back shortly), and for skipping to the new thread, but you said something about your new economics view that cries out for a sturdier foundation.
The best book of the decade, mentioned here before, is P. J. O'Rourke's "On the Wealth of Nations" which, independent of what you may think of the author, gives Adam Smith what he is due in every economics class and never gets. Smith explains what hasn't worked in history and why. He doesn't put forward a theory of what you should do, just what you should avoid because it hurts more than it helps.
Read it and you'll see all new economic lefties really are trying something old and threadbare -- they just don't know enough history to be able to see it.
Posted by: sbw | July 23, 2008 at 09:54 PM
"So over the last three days, Obama has gone from being willing to accept an Iraqi civil war to believing that the war cannot be "lost". Three days abroad make all the difference!"
That's a new one. It deserves honorable mention with Obama's other flip-flops, like his two-day shift from "Iran is not a serious threat" to "Iran is a grave threat."
Obama's flip-flops are escalating to a point they may induce whiplash. This guy needs a warning label.
Posted by: GnuCarSmell | July 23, 2008 at 10:00 PM
The Charlie Gibson interview with Obama was pretty good, based on the transcript. I particularly like this comment:
Gibson: But just because you put the word tough in front of the word diplomacy doesn't necessarily mean that you get anywhere.
Posted by: PaulL | July 23, 2008 at 10:06 PM
I swear there is a virtual candy store of choice "opinions' waiting to be found in the lefty blog archives...Matt Yglesias, Josh Marshall etc. etc.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | July 23, 2008 at 10:16 PM
I swear there is a virtual candy store of choice "opinions' waiting to be found in the lefty blog archives...Matt Yglesias, Josh Marshall etc. etc.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | July 23, 2008 at 10:20 PM
Paul,
Got a link?
Posted by: Jane | July 23, 2008 at 10:26 PM
would Barack consider a civil war a "loss"?
Barack would consider sitting in the bleachers on Jan 20, 2009 a loss.
Civil wars are mere details.
Posted by: Barney Frank | July 23, 2008 at 10:28 PM
OBAMA CAN'T GO 48 HOURS WITHOUT PULLING A BONER, AND THE MSM CAN'T GO 24 WITHOUT SUCKING IT.
PLEASE EXCUSE THE MIXED METAPHORS.
Posted by: reliapundit | July 23, 2008 at 10:29 PM
I posted this on one of the other threads; don't know if ya'll saw it:
Check out Drudge:
OBAMA VISITS WESTERN WALL IN OLD CITY JERUSALEM... ARRIVES AT 5:08 AM LOCAL TIME [10:08 PM ET]... SUNRISE... SHOUTING MAN: 'JERUSALEM IS NOT FOR SALE, OBAMA'... MOB SCENE... CHAOS... POSES FOR PHOTOS AT WALL... LOTS OF SHOUTING... LEAVES 5:20
AM... DEVELOPING...
Picture on Drudge with Obama campaign banners at the wall.
Posted by: tina | July 23, 2008 at 10:30 PM
Joe Klein? You mean the Joe Klein who wrote the book, Primary Colors by "Anonymous", then denied he was the author before he admitted he was the author? That Joe Klein?
Why should anyone pay attention to anything this boob says.
Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
Posted by: fouse, gary c | July 23, 2008 at 10:30 PM
Jane,
The Gibson interview transcript is in the far left column over at Real Clear Politics.
Posted by: PaulL | July 23, 2008 at 10:34 PM
Thanks!
Posted by: Jane | July 23, 2008 at 10:36 PM
All I can say after reading that interview is that Obama is the weasel we always knew he was.
LUN
Posted by: Jane | July 23, 2008 at 10:44 PM
I haven't read the interview, but I love the quote PaulL just highlighted. Obama started throwing the word "tough" in front of diplomacy when he got caught promising to meet with no preconditions. It's hilarious to me, and I'm soooo happy Gibson caught it.
Posted by: MayBee | July 23, 2008 at 10:48 PM
Shorter Gibson: "Just words"
Posted by: hit and run | July 23, 2008 at 10:52 PM
Thanks, Jane, but I cannot bear to even read his carp anymore. It's like trying to have a conversation with a psychopathic liar..It gives one a headache trying to keep awake.
Posted by: clarice | July 23, 2008 at 10:53 PM
Looks like Charlie Gibson nailed him. The lefties will push on NBC now to have Williams resuscitate him tomorrow.
Posted by: BobS | July 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM
It's like when Dukakis kept saying he was willing to "make the tough choices." Finally a reporter asked him to name a tough choice he was willing to make, and the man was speechless.
But it also reminds me of John Kerry saying in utter frustration that "I can't believe I'm losing to this idiot!" I can't believe McCain is losing to this transparently fraudulent tyro, but the current poll snapshots suggest that he is. So far.
Just keep in mind that in the ten elections from 1968 through 2004, the press was universally behind the Democrat in every one, but they still lost seven of them. (If you think that perhaps they were at best lukewarm for Carter in 1980, your memory is different from mine.) And does the press have more influence now, or less? Check out the joyful financial news about the New York Times today.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | July 23, 2008 at 10:59 PM
DOT: The arrogance of the eletist left is consistant in its, well, arrogance. The left treats opposing views as ignorant.
Posted by: BobS | July 23, 2008 at 11:04 PM
Hit, you said you didn't have the heart for Edwards jokes.
Byron York is there for you:
"A few months ago, Edwards, the Democratic party's 2004 vice-presidential candidate, seemed to pull himself out....But then, a couple of weeks ago, Edwards quietly put himself back in, telling National Public Radio, "I'm prepared to seriously consider anything, anything...asks me to do"
Wow.
Posted by: bgates | July 23, 2008 at 11:13 PM
Stevie Nicks is on Soundstage tonight on my PBS channel. She still looks terrific although she cannot quite hold a note as she did in the 70's and 80's. She opened her set with a great rendition of Stand Back.
Posted by: BobS | July 23, 2008 at 11:18 PM
She was better on "Sarah", especially on the song's dramatic ending. She added it reluctantly to the set as she considers it a Fleetwood Mac song.
Posted by: BobS | July 23, 2008 at 11:24 PM
Beliners pretty hacked off about having to pay large sum for the Obama rally. Looks like the City of Berlin will end up paying half the cost of the rally.
Isnt there a ban of foreign governments making a contributions to a campaign, whether its cash or in kind donations? Why isnt this an issue?
Posted by: GMax | July 23, 2008 at 11:33 PM
He apparently was not a hit at the Wailing Wall..
Posted by: clarice | July 23, 2008 at 11:40 PM
Stevie Nicks used to cause certain things to happen to me that don't happen as much now. Guess I must be smarter these days.
Or maybe...
Posted by: Danube of Thought | July 23, 2008 at 11:51 PM
AP's version:
Posted by: hit and run | July 23, 2008 at 11:57 PM
GMax-
I was thinking the exact same thing. Its nice to know that the German's have no problem interfering with our political campaigns and wonder how they would like it if we were to return the favor. Seems as if Bertelsmann AG is getting the return on their investment they have been waiting for.
Also a rally of a million Germans in front of a charismatic speaker might strike a discordant tone with voters of a certain age and sensibility.
Posted by: RichatUF | July 23, 2008 at 11:57 PM
Clarice:
He apparently was not a hit at the Wailing Wall..
Harrumph!
Like he could ever be me.
Posted by: hit and run | July 24, 2008 at 12:01 AM
DOT: I know exactly how you feel. Nicks is 60, yet with the wonders of all things she looks like Stevie of her FMac days...alluring, mysterious, unobtainable. But an icon tonight all the same
Posted by: BobS | July 24, 2008 at 12:01 AM
I actually think Germans resist charismatic campaigns at home due to a certain historical inconvenient truth.
Posted by: GMax | July 24, 2008 at 12:02 AM
DoT:
I was thinking almost the same thing when Obama said, "Those who know my track record have absolutely no doubt about my unwavering support for Israel and its security." It seemed to me the obvious follow-up was, "What track record?" Other than that, Gibson's remark about "tough diplomacy" was the high point in a real snoozer of a tete a tete.
What's most bizarre is that when you read what Obama says, he's not, in fact, very articulate. Aside from stringing unfinished thoughts together, he's all about using using words that make him sound more professional, even when they don't really make sense. "And I think all you can hope for in this kind of situation is real progress. And that's something that I think I can execute."
Much as Obama styles himself as JFK, he's Carter all over again. I was spending a lot of time in Georgia back in those days, and nobody could believe that the national press never noticed what a truly lousy governor he was.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 24, 2008 at 12:02 AM
Fleetwood Mac - sans Christine McVie- will make an album in 2009 plus do a tour
Posted by: BobS | July 24, 2008 at 12:04 AM
Remember when all the Brits decided to call downstate Ohio for Kerry? How did that work out again. This could well be an acme cigar that blows up in his face. We shall see, but I cant imagine wild german crowds will impress those not already easily impressed.
Posted by: GMax | July 24, 2008 at 12:05 AM
I haven't read the interview, but I love the quote PaulL just highlighted. Obama started throwing the word "tough" in front of diplomacy when he got caught promising to meet with no preconditions. It's hilarious to me, and I'm soooo happy Gibson caught it.
Posted by: MayBee | July 24, 2008 at 12:09 AM
I haven't read the interview, but I love the quote PaulL just highlighted. Obama started throwing the word "tough" in front of diplomacy when he got caught promising to meet with no preconditions. It's hilarious to me, and I'm soooo happy Gibson caught it.
Posted by: MayBee | July 24, 2008 at 12:10 AM
JMH: Carter went to Annapolis and JFK served herroically in WWII and had both pedegrie and experience in government. Obama is an empty creation of vision and breadth that surpases that of the Grifter Clintons. Even they had been hardened by public service and some significant acheivements.
Posted by: BobS | July 24, 2008 at 12:11 AM
Rumor has it that McCain is traveling to Columbus, Ohio tomorrow since he had to cancel his trip to an off-shore oil rig in Louisiana.
If the big surprise is an announcement of his V.P. pick, it would be either former Rep. Rob Portman (R-OH) or former Rep. John Kasich (R-OH).
This would be a hugh mistake. Kasich of O'Reilly fame is nuts and no one knows who Portman is except for the people in Portsmouth. Good Grief!
Posted by: Ann | July 24, 2008 at 12:17 AM
If you haven't seen this, pretty clever production....they should buy time and air it on national TV, but the networks would reject it...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfogMFL7UJo
Posted by: ben | July 24, 2008 at 12:19 AM
Ann: I really think he's lining up surrogates. It will be Romney or Tom Ridge.
Posted by: BobS | July 24, 2008 at 12:19 AM
If McCain is going to second tier he needs to take the Alaskan gov
Posted by: BobS | July 24, 2008 at 12:34 AM
Obama on Obama while talking with Gibson:
How many times has the dude assured us of his humility?
LUN
Posted by: bad | July 24, 2008 at 12:42 AM
Or Michael Steele.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads aka vnjagvet | July 24, 2008 at 12:42 AM
BobS,
Since the big Obama Berlin speech is tomorrow ( http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/07/sprechen-sie-de.html ">have you seen his not campaigning in Berlin fliers ), I think McCain will try and get some attention. This would be just the worst kind.*
*I live in Columbus,Ohio.
Posted by: Ann | July 24, 2008 at 12:44 AM
Joe Klein is a liberal, suck-up wordsmith
just dying for a lefty black "icon" to
run the show. This will emancipate him and
his ilk from that nagging white guilt that
shadows them all. Matthews summed it up
well with the "tingle up my leg" during
a Big O psychobabble event early on in
the campaign. The fact that Obama is a
dunce is, for him or them, trumped by his
"blackness". And they can't understand
why any Americans refuse to genuflect upon
the MSM cue.
Posted by: 357 Magnum | July 24, 2008 at 12:49 AM
Obama on Palestinians:
religious gun crazies in america = palestinians
Obama needs to expand his vocabulary.
Posted by: bad | July 24, 2008 at 01:09 AM
Or is Klein just blowing smoke?
I thought that Nurse Bloomberg made blowing smoke illegal in New York (or was Klein in Washington at the time).
Posted by: Barry Dauphin | July 24, 2008 at 01:21 AM
Great post!!
Posted by: Americaneocon | July 24, 2008 at 02:35 AM
He was a whore for Clinton, now a whore for Obama. He is also something of a dummy.
Posted by: pat | July 24, 2008 at 02:44 AM
Ann at 12:17, you wrote, in part:
"This would be a hugh mistake. Kasich of O'Reilly fame is nuts and no one knows who Portman is except for the people in Portsmouth. Good Grief!"
Maybe you meant Portsmouth in a symbolic sense of just any town in Ohio. But I'm from Cincinnati, which is Portman's home town. He was our representative for a number of consecutive terms. He's highly regarded. You are correct that he's not well known, but look out for him in the next decade. Younger Republicans may eclipse him, but he will be a prominent figure as we look forward.
Posted by: SAM | July 24, 2008 at 04:52 AM
Klein just blowing smoke .. up his own ass.
Posted by: Neo | July 24, 2008 at 08:27 AM
I'd like someone to ask Obama who is the toughest negotiator he's ever faced.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | July 24, 2008 at 10:17 AM
Methinks Klein protesteth overly much.
======================
Posted by: kim | July 24, 2008 at 10:50 AM
Please do not hesitate to have wakfu kamas . It is funny.
Posted by: sophy | January 06, 2009 at 10:30 PM