Betsy Newmark thinks Michelle Obama's speech will impress those who only know about her "what she said yesterday". Memory aides are provided.
Tiger Hawk rounds up the round-ups and opines:
First Lady Michelle Obama would be a dramatic, jarring, revealing, awakening, slap in the face for Americans who want their first lady a certain way. That might be just what we need.
Too bad they're such lefties.
I gave her speech a pass - I figured the professional image consultants would do a fine job preparing something go her to read.
KVETCH, KVETCH: Even the NY Times can't keep this quiet:
DENVER — When her husband ran for Congress in 2000, Michelle Obama groused so much about handshaking and fund-raising that Arthur Sussman, then her boss at the University of Chicago, finally asked if she truly could not find a single thing about campaigning to enjoy.
Mrs. Obama thought for a moment. Visiting so many living rooms had given her some new decorating ideas, she allowed.
Eight years later, the once reluctant campaigner is at the center of a multimedia charm offensive that may be the most closely managed spousal rollout in presidential campaign history. On Monday night, Mrs. Obama delivered a prime-time speech at the Democratic National Convention, preceded by an intricately made biographical video, a touch usually afforded to candidates, not their wives.
Even Obama, in The Audacity of Hope, mentioned that it is often raining in Michelle's world. But not last night!
The transformation of Michelle Obama from a bracingly proud contemporary woman -- mother, wife, career woman -- into a prime time Betty Crocker was sad to see.
He liked the Sister Grim better angry. This wanted-to-be-fawning-but-couldn't New Yorker profile should bring back happier memories.
This gull is not a happy camper.
===================
Posted by: kim | August 26, 2008 at 11:00 AM
I could probably put up with Michelle if her husband didn't want to bring back all the old liberal policies that failed when we tried them in the 60s and 70s.
Obama doesn't seem to have any new ideas. The civilian defense force is a new idea for us, but another guy tried it in the 40s.
Posted by: MikeS | August 26, 2008 at 11:02 AM
Anybody seen any ratings for last night's show?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | August 26, 2008 at 11:21 AM
clarice, Rick Ballard,
I've had trouble keeping up with things. I only this morning got around to reading the Spengler article you both recommended, and enjoyed it. Very pithy:
Would that EITHER candidate showed a little of that insight. And that's what the supreme leader of the crunchy cons is saying this morning--along with some actually pretty good insights into the American psycho--woops--psyche: We Are Not All Georgians Now.
Disclaimer: I am NOT a crunchy con. However, Bacevich's point was one I had in mind when I posted that link yesterday--the business about Americans as fundamentally "conservative." Is the idea of America as "a providential instrument for the spread of righteousness throughout the world" part of that "conservative" constellation of ideas? I suspect so. And I think it's a pernicious idea.
Lots to do today.
Posted by: anduril | August 26, 2008 at 11:34 AM
Ya gotta give her points for standing by her man.
Posted by: Jane | August 26, 2008 at 11:34 AM
Morarji Desai lost the election to lead India twice. After the second time someone asked him why he was not desolated by the loss. He is reported to have said, "If you cannot be happy in the most difficult of times, you will never be happy."
Michelle will never be happy. Neither in good times nor bad.
She doesn't know what she has. She doesn't know what she could accomplish. She doesn't know what she should accomplish.
She is no Barbara Bush. No Eleanor Roosevelt.
Posted by: sbw | August 26, 2008 at 11:52 AM
See me bodyguarding Michelle Malkin at the Denver Mint.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | August 26, 2008 at 11:53 AM
Hmmmm, Spengler is hard on American politicians in Americans play Monopoly, Russians chess. But I like the chess v. monopoly metaphor:
You can disagree with Spengler in detail, but I think he has the big picture approximately right: Russian cooperation is in our interest and is a doable thing--their interests are not that different than ours. They don't want a nuclear Iran, and they know that China covets Siberia. If only the US were smart enough to act like a friend, instead of slapping away Russia in favor of "a gang of trigger-happy pimps and drug-pushers in Kosovo."
Posted by: anduril | August 26, 2008 at 11:55 AM
Oh, pshaw. Leave out the 'providential' and what is the matter with spreading righteousness, as well as sweetness and light? Sounds lovingly pernicious to me.
Where every prospect pleases, and only man is vile.
===============================
Posted by: kim | August 26, 2008 at 12:09 PM
Here's a fascinating Der Spiegel article re NATO politics from a German perspective (long): BERLIN'S SHIFTING POLICY.
This one is problematic, but a few points are worth considering: Dropping the Ball on Russia Policy. After discounting most conventional reasons for why Russia did what it did, the authors leave us wondering--then why did they do it? Just because they could get away with it? Not likely. But they have their points, too...
Outta here.
Posted by: anduril | August 26, 2008 at 12:15 PM
Wow, Charlie! Well done.
Posted by: Jim | August 26, 2008 at 12:17 PM
Mr Greenshirt, Charlie, may find himself the recipient of a criminal charge and absolutely zero support from anyone, if he was, in fact, provoking violence, as it appears. It is peaceable assembly that is protected.
==================
Posted by: kim | August 26, 2008 at 12:19 PM
I thought Michelle's performance was fine.
She scored 8.0-8.5 with a degree of difficulty of about 0.9
The only way she could have blown that speech would have to either walk out on-stage wearing bandoliers or if she went all Sally Field on the audience and broke down in tears.
But, let's let noted racist Chris Rock have his say:
----------------------------
Barack has a handicap the other candidates don’t have: Barack Obama has a black wife.
And I don’t think a black woman can be first lady of the United States. Yeah, I said it!
A black woman can be president, no problem. First lady? Can’t do it. You know why?
Because a black woman cannot play the background of a relationship. Just imagine telling your black wife that you’re president?
‘Honey, I did it! I won! I’m the president.’
‘No, we the president! And I want my girlfriends in the Cabinet! I want Kiki to be secretary of state! She can fight!"
-----------------------
Posted by: BumperStickerist | August 26, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Wow, even Pielke Pere has an article about the narrow view of climate science being communicated to the nations' physics teachers. See at climatesci.org
==================================
Posted by: kim | August 26, 2008 at 12:25 PM
Anduril, you have discovered one of my shortcomings. My attention span is several inches shorter than your comments. Perhaps there is a way present your substance in a pithy fashion with outside references to shore up the argument.
Ah, but the universe does not revolve around me.
Posted by: sbw | August 26, 2008 at 12:26 PM
Michelle Obama has soul and is not afraid to show it! Her speech last night at the DNC ranks up there with the best America has ever heard.
Posted by: beth | August 26, 2008 at 12:28 PM
Beth,
You have to be a parody of the left.
Posted by: Sue | August 26, 2008 at 12:29 PM
beth, does that mean she is a 'soul sister'?
=========================
Posted by: kim | August 26, 2008 at 12:32 PM
Mr. Phillip J. Berg, a Pennsylvania attorney, has filed a lawsuit/complaint against Barack Hussein Obama claiming that Obama is NOT a U.S. natural born citizen.
Hear his discussion:
http://www.plainsradio.com/
Complaint and details:
http://www.nextgenerationcorp.com/NextGenBlog/?p=43
Posted by: AdrianS | August 26, 2008 at 12:33 PM
I thought this thread was supposed to be about Michelle Obama.
The universe doesn't revolve around me either, SBW, but I share your shortcoming.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | August 26, 2008 at 12:36 PM
Obviously my attention span has been shortened by the real work of managing our newspaper. (Perhaps that's why I suggested Anduril tighten it up.) But I could also only watch 1:30 of the video of guerilla theater at the Mint before clicking the stop button and retreating from it.
Why? Because the scene was no place for Michelle Malkin, or Charlie, or any journalist. Journalism provides a means of positive -- useful -- feedback. The situation only lent itself to negative feedback -- like the squeal when a microphone gets too close to a speaker.
In the Mint case, the camera and reporter are the focus for the spontaneous creation of an event that is noise, not news.
I will not be part of it.
Posted by: sbw | August 26, 2008 at 12:36 PM
Cheers and swoons for the "liberal lion" of the Senate who began as the son of the man who wanted to appease Hitler, cheated at Harvard, drove a young woman to her death, split his party in 1980, and was up to his eyeballs in the William Kennedy Smith case.
Great times!
Posted by: The Ace | August 26, 2008 at 12:41 PM
Her speech last night at the DNC ranks up there with the best America has ever heard.
What part did you like best Beth?
Posted by: Jane | August 26, 2008 at 12:54 PM
In the Mint case, the camera and reporter are the focus for the spontaneous creation of an event that is noise, not news.
I will not be part of it.
People who willfully create that kind of scene tend to be the same people who think America is just wretched. I would think so too, if I surrounded myself with anger and noise and heat with no real goal but to create anger, noise, and heat.
Leave me out of it. Direct me to the happy place. I'll try to solve problems from there.
Posted by: MayBee | August 26, 2008 at 01:11 PM
OT - Edward Cardinal Egan's Response to Speaker Pelosi
On topic - I wonder what type of coaching and training achieved this very decent result by Michelle? I also wonder if it will hold up.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | August 26, 2008 at 01:18 PM
In the way that Obama's trip to Europe garnered him praise from the left that he "looked like" a Commander-in-Chief, I say that Michelle's speech made her "look like" a happy first lady.
This Democratic campaign season has been one giant casting call.
Posted by: MayBee | August 26, 2008 at 01:21 PM
What part did you like best ?
OH OH OH I know this one, Try this. Snicker
Michelle Obama said something that peeked my curiousity. She said:
"Barack stood up that day," talking about a visit to Chicago neighborhoods, "and spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about “The world as it is” and “The world as it should be..."
And, "All of us driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won’t do – that we have an obligation to fight for the world as it should be."
Here’s an excerpt from Chapter 2 of Saul Alinsky’s book, Rules for Radicals:
"The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive — but real — allies of the Haves…The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means... The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be."
Hat Tip Andy Bryant and Gateway Pundit
Posted by: LH | August 26, 2008 at 01:24 PM
On topic - I wonder what type of coaching and training achieved this very decent result by Michelle? I also wonder if it will hold up.
Rick, she's smart and she knows what she has to do.
Frankly, how low is the bar set when talking about loving your family is an earth-shattering accomplishment?
Posted by: MayBee | August 26, 2008 at 01:25 PM
"What part did you like best Beth?"
I liked the part where she kept saying "see". Preachers do that a lot, see. Funny that. She was very practiced, see. She also made sure she kept her body langauge in check. See, she was pretty close to throwing her balled fist in the air a few times, she kind of had a boxer's rhythm going on, see. Kind of a long rhythm, along with the steppin' n punchin', see.
Anyway, I was not impressed Michelle Ov2.
Posted by: Enlightened | August 26, 2008 at 01:25 PM
bodyguarding Michelle Malkin
Lucky for her nobody brought up immigration, or Charlie would have let them have her.
Posted by: bgates | August 26, 2008 at 01:26 PM
Figures. Michelle Obama Quotes Lines From "Rules For Radicals" In Her DNC Convention Speech
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | August 26, 2008 at 01:26 PM
My paraphrase of Dennis Miller's take on Michelle's speech;
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | August 26, 2008 at 01:28 PM
Michelle Obama did okay. She showed little passion, little excitement, her applause was polite but lukewarm, and she didn't leave much that is memorable after a 24 hour news cycle. But she did adhere to the first rule of do no harm.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | August 26, 2008 at 01:29 PM
SBW and DoT...
I'm still trying to figure out the ins and outs of Greasemonkey, but it looks like it might be a fix for our common attention span problem.
On topic...
This Michele will not hold up. She's putting on a public face but has 40+ years of angst and rage percolating behind the mask. It's going to bubble out unless they keep her locked up.
So plan on seeing less of Bulldoggy until November.
I'm not complaining about that either.
Posted by: Soylent Red | August 26, 2008 at 01:30 PM
I thought it was really disingenuous of her to sound like she left her high paying attorney job to take a lesser job in the community and then not go on in her bio. to mention that she then left that to take a job that pays her over $300,000 a year.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | August 26, 2008 at 01:32 PM
The laugh line of her speech (or puke-worthy line) is this:
"His word is his bond".
What a bunch of malarkey.
Posted by: tina | August 26, 2008 at 01:33 PM
Posted this on the other thread - McCain +2 per Gallup today, 46-44. First time McCain has taken the lead since June. Major bad news for Obama - talk about negative bounce.
Also related - this level of coverage in WaPo means Dems are worried bigtime:
For Those From Swing States, The Watchword Is . . . Worry
Posted by: Porchlight | August 26, 2008 at 01:34 PM
Rick:
"I wonder what type of coaching and training achieved this very decent result by Michelle?"
Eric Holder was there to take on the VP search. Caroline Kennedy S. was there to take on Michelle.
Posted by: JM Hanes | August 26, 2008 at 01:36 PM
"His word is his bond"
Sure it is - right up til the expiration date!
Posted by: Jane | August 26, 2008 at 01:37 PM
Well, like a true lefty, she has nary an original thought to work with. How do these libs keep track of which playbook is current?
Posted by: Enlightened | August 26, 2008 at 01:37 PM
"Frankly, how low is the bar set when talking about loving your family is an earth-shattering accomplishment?"
MayBee,
What's the world record height for limbo? I was just wondering whether negative or positive reinforcemnt was used - you know - was someone holding up a shock collar in the wings? Or was it an Hermes scarf?
Posted by: Rick Ballard | August 26, 2008 at 01:39 PM
American Issues Project Responds to Obama Campaign’s Efforts to Compel TV Stations, Government to Censor Ad
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | August 26, 2008 at 01:40 PM
"His word is his bond"
Heh. Is that the bond of the day? Or the bond of the minute? Last month's bond? His bond in 2005? His bond has flipped so many times, maybe he needs extra strength Polident.
Posted by: Enlightened | August 26, 2008 at 01:41 PM
His word is his bond, and his bond declined 2% in value overnight.
Posted by: sbw | August 26, 2008 at 01:42 PM
Cute kids and cuddly animals are always a hit with Americans. However, the bump from it will fade once the Bush-hating begins to be shown on the networks too. They should have had her speak last, not first.
Today's Gallup Tracking Poll: McCain46, Obama44. First time in over 3 months with a McCain lead.
Joe Biden really worked wonders for Obama!
Posted by: bio mom | August 26, 2008 at 01:43 PM
This is deja vu all over again, Sara. Remember Kerry trying to keep the TV stations from running the Swiftie ads, and the bookstores from selling the book?
====================================
Posted by: kim | August 26, 2008 at 01:46 PM
Were our live bloggers commenting on the drunk-seemingness of the speakers last night?
From Politico:
Posted by: MayBee | August 26, 2008 at 01:50 PM
"Caroline Kennedy S. was there to take on Michelle."
I think Oprah is roaming around Denver too, somewhere. The first thing I thought when I saw Michelles hair last night - very bouncy, very shiny - was that it looked just like an Oprah "do."
I think what we saw last night was just the "Oprah-fication" of Michelle. But, it won't last - Michelle will burst through eventually.
Posted by: centralcal | August 26, 2008 at 01:53 PM
Kim: Yes I remember well. The Dems. want a totalitarian state so much, they get ahead of themselves and start thinking we already have one. That is why they project so much about "W" and Cheney. They cannot believe that all Americans aren't as nasty, sneaky, underhanded, and dictatorial as they are. They cannot understand why the great unwashed stupid masses don't accept their superiority and throw roses at their feet and shout "hiel" as they walk by.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | August 26, 2008 at 01:53 PM
Hmmmmm. Even the Euros are starting to get it: Why Obama looks vulnerable. Hey, what happened? This was linked in its entirety this morning.
Posted by: anduril | August 26, 2008 at 01:57 PM
Well--which official was it? I haven't paid enough attention to know, but surely there must have been a list of scheduled speakers, one of whom didn't show. Jump on this, somebody! Help!
Posted by: Danube of Thought | August 26, 2008 at 01:59 PM
gee I wanted to hear more from Jimmy Carter and Teddy Kennedy.....They muzzled JC pretty well, a wave and off into whatever oblivion he's living in these days...and I just loved Teddy's inclusion of straight and gay at the end....that'll set off a few people.....the press really needs to follow up with the both of them and get their honest opinions....
As to Michelle, it sounds like she has the classic American power gig going; $300K/year, someone to watch the kids while she power lunches her way across America, and she's still pissed off? She strikes me as one really angry woman, even when she's lightness and sweet...naw, she's hard.....
Posted by: matt | August 26, 2008 at 02:03 PM
Convention schedule - LUN
Posted by: Jane | August 26, 2008 at 02:03 PM
Michelle Obama:
"... All of us driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won’t do – that we have an obligation to fight for the world as it should be ..."
Perhaps someone should tell her and her ilk that as nice as this sentiment is, we must fight and survive in the world that still IS .... otherwise, we won't live long enough to remake the world as it should be.
Posted by: fdcol63 | August 26, 2008 at 02:06 PM
Fox is interviewing Stanley Kurtz and talking about the boxes of documents. They're at the library, I think.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | August 26, 2008 at 02:08 PM
I rather liked the story about Barack driving home from the hospital with his baby girl. Father/Daughter stuff gets me every time.
Posted by: Lea | August 26, 2008 at 02:12 PM
I'm trying to figure out who it is too, DoT. My other thought was that perhaps you actually have to throw up to be too drunk to speak at the DNC.
Posted by: MayBee | August 26, 2008 at 02:16 PM
I gave her speech a pass - I figured the professional image consultants would do a fine job preparing something go her to read.
Are we a might cynical, perhaps? It was, if anything, too precious, and would have failed if one had caught the slightest whiff of the inauthentic. You don’t like loving families for some reason?
If one must talk about scripting, try P.O.W. as the all purpose get out of jail free card……….
Posted by: TexasToast | August 26, 2008 at 02:42 PM
“The world as it is” and “The world as it should be..."
Right. Let's base policy on the world as it is. Reality based--in foreign policy as in domestic. Some conservatives go astray here, too.
Posted by: anduril | August 26, 2008 at 02:47 PM
MayBee-
I'm trying to figure out who it is too, DoT. My other thought was that perhaps you actually have to throw up to be too drunk to speak at the DNC.
My guess is that Jimmy Carter got too tanked up to speak. They got him on the stage, then off the stage pretty fast. Pelosi had to have been a bit tanked up too-she's Speaker of the House, she can speak well in front of a friendly audience, and she was yanked in less than 10 minutes.
Posted by: RichatUF | August 26, 2008 at 02:55 PM
TexasToast commented:
I am confused. Did McCain's image consultants arrange for him to be tortured by the North Vietnamese when he was a young man so he would have a "card" to play when he ran for political office?
It really amazes me that many of McCain's opponents have no clue as to the respect in which McCain is held by folks who disagree with him on many issues and are fully aware that he has acted as a "bad boy" with "issues" (such as Keating) at times. McCain's folks can only hope that his detractors keep yapping about "playing the POW card." It will simply emphasize the contrast of how McCain and Obama spent their time as young men.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | August 26, 2008 at 02:59 PM
The convention had the worst ratings ever...That tells you that all this money being spent on graphics, speech writers, image manipoulators is going for naught.
Even better Gallup has O down 2 points against mcCain today.
Maybe he should really try that parachute into Invesco Stadium I suggested the other day.
Posted by: clarice | August 26, 2008 at 03:04 PM
**manipulators**
Posted by: clarice | August 26, 2008 at 03:05 PM
Here we go:
"Politics is a game. And it's all about mischaracterization," [Michelle] Obama said.
Nice to see her say it.
Get a load of this:
What is the 'doing this' to which she refers?
'Diplomatic' = giving the answer to an unasked question.
NPR
LUN
Posted by: MayBee | August 26, 2008 at 03:05 PM
try P.O.W. as the all purpose get out of jail free card……….
That works for me.
Posted by: Sue | August 26, 2008 at 03:09 PM
I found video of Michelle's speech from last night -- the whole speech is here but in separate parts
http://weblogs.cltv.com/news/local/chicago/2008/08/video_michelle_obamas_dnc_spee.html
Posted by: ChiCat | August 26, 2008 at 03:12 PM
Texas Toast,
On a serious note, if last night had been the first time I had heard Michelle Obama speak, I would have been impressed with her. I'm sure she went over well with her "first" impression to anyone not as involved in the political process as some of us are. Her speech is her typical stump speech, cleaned up for the general audience. Since I have heard it before, without being cleaned up, I was not impressed.
Posted by: Sue | August 26, 2008 at 03:13 PM
Junk Bonds.
Posted by: PeterUK | August 26, 2008 at 03:13 PM
"If one must talk about scripting, try P.O.W. as the all purpose get out of jail free card………"
Gee, I kinda like "Reporting for Duty." That'll work, won't it?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | August 26, 2008 at 03:18 PM
Nice to hear the ratings are in the tank.
I read somewhere that it was planned in advance that Carter would be tightly restricted because of the loony pronouncements he has made about Israel in recent years.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | August 26, 2008 at 03:20 PM
“The world as it is” and “The world as it should be..."
The words of your putative president,Barrack will be doing the ironing.
Need a slight correction,
“The world as it is” and “The world as I think it should be..."
There,don't you feel happier?
Posted by: PeterUK | August 26, 2008 at 03:25 PM
How long has it been since the wives started giving major speeches at the conventions? I don't suppose Mamie Eisenhower did, or Jackie or Lady Bird or Pat or even Betty, but maybe I'm wrong.
Anyway, if they want to be so front and center, let's get past this scripted imagery and get them debating. Maybe a little coffee clatch type of joint sit-down format.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 26, 2008 at 03:31 PM
Jimmy "Attack Rabbit" Carter speaking yesterday about Michelle's husband (I don't want to give it away but let's just say the words "black" and "boy" are used):
Carter on Obama (37 second video)
Maybe it was a good idea to give him the brush off and not let him speak at the convention.
Posted by: Billy De Beers | August 26, 2008 at 03:36 PM
If one must talk about scripting, try P.O.W. as the all purpose get out of jail free card.
The irony, of course, is that John McCain was offered a "get out of jail free card" in Hanoi and turned it down.
I have a friend who works for the Obama campaign and was enraged by McCain's "cross in the dirt" story, certain that he made it up. At this point, two former POWs have gone on record saying McCain told them this story back in the 70s (including Bud Day, a Medal of Honor recipient). Republicans can only hope and pray the Dems decide to psuh this angle.
Posted by: Mars vs Hollywood | August 26, 2008 at 03:36 PM
"Anyway, if they want to be so front and center, let's get past this scripted imagery and get them debating. Maybe a little coffee clatch type of joint sit-down format."
Or even better,let them run for office.After all,women's liberation and all that and they are still marrying the job.
Posted by: PeterUK | August 26, 2008 at 03:38 PM
A hurricane is headed towards NO on the during the Republican convention. ::sigh:: I can already write the headlines.
Posted by: Sue | August 26, 2008 at 03:41 PM
Michelle Obama said something that peeked(sic) my curiousity. She said:
"Barack stood up that day," talking about a visit to Chicago neighborhoods, "and spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about “The world as it is” and “The world as it should be..."
Part of her speech must be missing--you know the part where O and his lawfirm made money getting public funds shifted to Rezko and other slumlords to improve housing for Chicago's poor; that they didn't do this; that the housing was worse when he finished than it was before he made his emptry promises.
Posted by: clarice | August 26, 2008 at 03:45 PM
Pelosi to protesters: "Can we drill your brains?"
This woman is nuts. But I think she's in love with the limelight and no one will be able to shut her up now. She may become one of McCain's most effective campaigners.
Posted by: anduril | August 26, 2008 at 04:00 PM
Sue-
I can already write the headlines.
George Bush hates black people. (no that's been tried...)
How about...and cometh from Denver of Colorado to the masses of Orleans of New, the One, bringer of light and hope, appeared to drive the storm away. The strom was conjured by the evil Rove from the tribe of Elephants to hurt the people of Orleans of New, the weak, and the poor, and those not of the tribe of the Elephant.
The One spoketh thus: "I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal". The One then raised his hands and pushed back the conjured storm from the evil Rove, away from the masses of Orleans of New. The masses of Orleans of New flocked to the One and light and hope was restored. And word of this miracle spreadth through the land.
Posted by: RichatUF | August 26, 2008 at 04:05 PM
That's the kind of sophomoric stuff that goes down well with the Kos kids but will play very poorly with normal people.
Posted by: anduril | August 26, 2008 at 04:05 PM
Pelosi. I had hoped that once it became clear that she's crazy and senile, the Dems would relegate her to a back bench.
And then I remembered Robert Byrd.
Posted by: fdcol63 | August 26, 2008 at 04:05 PM
**empty promises***
She is nuts. It's a matter of time before Armani designs a strait jacket for her. In the meantime. Enjoy the wit and wisdom of Nancy who just yesterday revealed that (a) she thought natural gas was a renewable resource, not a fossil fuel and (b) that the Catholic church had no firm opinion on when in the gestation period abortion was permissible.
Dumb. As . A. Post.
Posted by: clarice | August 26, 2008 at 04:07 PM
Fox is reporting there is a plan afoot to force Clinton delegates off the floor and to have to vote from their hotel rooms. Can they possibly be that stupid?
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | August 26, 2008 at 04:09 PM
Clarice, I didn't hear Nancy, but I read she said the Catholic church just came to the abortion is bad position about 50 years ago. Is that her position?
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | August 26, 2008 at 04:10 PM
Clarice
Ayers and CAC are starting to get national MSM attention. Your article should hit at just the right time for people wanting to know more. Work your magic.
Posted by: bad | August 26, 2008 at 04:14 PM
Uh oh.
Link
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | August 26, 2008 at 04:16 PM
Sara, she said doctors in the church weren't certain when life began--and then some gibberish about church doctrine and then more about how nothing inCatholic teaching was inconsistent with Roe v, Wade which somehow she seemed to think applied aonly to the first three moinths.
Well, bad, HELP!! I can't do much until Kurtz tells us what he's got. and then I've very little time to work it up.
Here's a goody--Ayres praising Kerry for throwing his medals over the fence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YrDwYNEyw8
Posted by: clarice | August 26, 2008 at 04:17 PM
Bad,
Barone on Ayers
Looks as if the question, "Who sent you?" isn't going away.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | August 26, 2008 at 04:18 PM
A fashion break is in order. This woman has more guts than Obama
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | August 26, 2008 at 04:26 PM
"Who sent you?"
Exactly. Barack Obama is about as hard left as Johnny Iselin. If you want to find out whether there is a leftist there, first there has to be a there there. An egomaniacal narcissist? Yes. But then, so was Johnny.
Posted by: Jim | August 26, 2008 at 04:35 PM
"Who sent you?"
O: They can ask that question all they want, but they can't have my dog Checkers.
Posted by: sbw | August 26, 2008 at 04:41 PM
"Fox is reporting there is a plan afoot to force Clinton delegates off the floor and to have to vote from their hotel rooms. Can they possibly be that stupid?"
There is no doubt that Fox viewers would be stupid enough to believe that.
Posted by: Tyro | August 26, 2008 at 04:44 PM
There is no doubt that Fox viewers would be stupid enough to believe that.
I guess you didn't get the memo, Fox is shilling for Obama big time.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | August 26, 2008 at 04:48 PM
Pelosi to protesters: "Can we drill your brains?"
Wonderful news,the Democrats have come up with an acceptable alternative to waterboarding.
Posted by: PeterUK | August 26, 2008 at 04:49 PM
eesh. there's a brush fire up the road a few miles.
Posted by: MayBee | August 26, 2008 at 04:50 PM
It was, if anything, too precious
Agreed. If the wife of a Republican candidate had given the identical speech it would have been pooh-poohed as being too Leave-it-to-Beaver-ish.
Posted by: Porchlight | August 26, 2008 at 04:52 PM
Mitt Romney on Cavuto:
When asked how many houses he owned, he answered, "one less than John Kerry."
Also, he doesn't think the "politics of envy" plays well in America.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | August 26, 2008 at 04:52 PM
pooh-poohed as being too Leave-it-to-Beaver-ish.
I read somewhere last night that dems were saying that Michelle was trying to sound like June Cleaver.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | August 26, 2008 at 04:55 PM
Wait 'til you see Obama try and transform himself from Alger Hiss into Horatio Alger on Thursday night.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | August 26, 2008 at 04:59 PM
she thought natural gas was a renewable resource
With her it is. Or at least she seems to have an endless supply.
Posted by: anduril | August 26, 2008 at 05:00 PM