What will Michael Phelps do after winning eight gold medals in Beijing? He plans on going to London - in 2012. And why not? He won six gold medals at age nineteen, another eight at age twenty-three, and there is no reason to think he won't be at a comparable level of ability at age twenty-seven (His teammate Jason Lezak is anchoring relays at thirty-two).
Normally swimmers run out of either money or motivation. Phelps is estimated to be pulling down $5 million a year in endorsements, which may help solve both problems. More importantly, he seems to enjoy the sport and wants to raise its profile beyond one week every four years in the American consciousness.
He does not seem to be targeting nine golds in London:
THE FUTURE
Phelps will drop most, if not all, of the events he has swum in Beijing. The first to go will be the 400m medley, a gruelling event, but he has other targets and has declared that he will race on until London 2012 in different events, including:
400m freestyle The world record has been held by Ian Thorpe at 3min 40.08sec since 2002. The nearest anyone has got is 3:41.86, with which Park Tae-Hwan, of Korea, became Olympic champion. Phelps has never raced a 400m fully rested, but he is the fifth-fastest American ever, at 3:46.73
100m and 200m backstroke Phelps is the third-fastest ever in the 200m, behind the men who took gold and silver here in Beijing, Ryan Lochte and Aaron Peirsol. In the 100m, Phelps is fifth-fastest ever, within half a second of the world record
100m freestyle Coming into these Games, the world record stood at 47.50sec. Phelps clocked 47.51 leading off the United States’ 4x100m relay in the midst of a monumental programme. The world record was lowered to 47.05 by Australia’s Eamon Sullivan and the Olympic title went to Alain Bernard in 47.21
Interesting - as runners age they move up in distance, but Phelps wants to move down to the 100 free (and we saw forty-one year old Dana Torres swim the 50 free, so go figure).
Well, if Phelps wants to contest the 100 and 400 free he may as well add the 200 so he can be the greatest free-styler of all time. Toss in three relays and he collects six medals. On the other hand, variety is the spice of life - working on more than one stroke may help keep his workouts interesting.
As to whether the public will have had enough of Phelps, and whether a pursuit of a mere six golds would provide a compelling story line, time will tell.
SINCE YOU ASK: The great American swimmer Don Schollander won the 100 and 400 free in Tokyo back in 1964; the 200 was not added to the program until 1968. Johnny Weismuller also managed the 100/400 double.
Closer to home, Phelps' rival and inspiration Ian Thorpe took bronze, gold and gold in the 100/200/400 triple at Athens in 2004.
I hear he plans to become a Chinese gymnast.
If I was him, I'd spend some money - frivolously.
Posted by: Jane | August 17, 2008 at 11:14 AM
"As to whether the public will have had enough of Phelps, and whether a pursuit of a mere six golds would provide a compelling story line, time will tell."
Looks to me like some folks may have already overdosed on Phelps, if not the story line. After last night's relay, the woman who does the poolside victory interviews asked two of Phelps' fellow medalists to fill the world in on what Phelps winning all those gold medals meant to swimmers.
It seemed pretty obtuse, given the immediate circumstances, (and a couple of unprintable answers occurred to me) but I can see how she might have been a little desperate to find an approach that didn't involve asking Phelps how he felt, for the umpteenth time. Oddly enough, none of his answers actually stick out in my memory. Perhaps that's partly because the story line (Can Phelps beat Mark Spitz gold record?) was so set in cement that nobody really asked him particularly interesting questions.
Whether the Greatest Athlete of All Time wears well over the next 4 years will probably depend on whether he's represented by someone with real savvy about how his endorsements are scripted, no? A little high profile mentoring on the side always helps. Assuming he does do Olympics '12, I just hope he enters less than eight competitions. Otherwise the only thing we'll be hearing, ad nauseum, is "Can he do it again?," until we get to, "How does he feel about failing to equal his own achievement?," if he only wins seven.
As a rather sad little coda, IMO, a reporter here at home asked Mark Spitz if he would be in Bejing to cheer the U.S. team on, and he replied that no one had invited him.
Posted by: JM Hanes | August 17, 2008 at 12:21 PM
I'm impressed by Phelps but I'm perhaps more impressed by Dara Torres. Women approaching 40 are considered old news after 19 in Hollywood and in the dating scene. She showed that a 41 year old woman is just as vital if not more so. The fact that she won silver and lost gold by a hair is a triumph for approaching-middle aged men and women.
Posted by: sylvia | August 17, 2008 at 12:52 PM
Obviously enjoyed Phelp's achievements and loved Dara Torres emotions and performances, but is there honestly any greater instant in sports than the moment that the solitary leader of the Olympic's Marathon enters the stadium for that last lap around the track and the explosive cheers of the crowd blow the roof off the place? I think not.
Posted by: Daddy | August 17, 2008 at 01:23 PM
I'm surprised that Speedo didn't invite Spitz to Beijing.
The good news for him is that there is good money to be made in niche marketing internationally that won't necessarily overexpose him. He has made $5 mil pretty steadily with only a few of his endorsements being seen by the general public.
So, he can do the few big ad campaigns here, but still make money by targeting the swimming/sports world.
Did you know there is an Ian Thorpe sports beverage in Japan? It is by Yakult, I believe, and is called Thorpedo.
Posted by: MayBee | August 17, 2008 at 02:13 PM
For him = Phelps
Posted by: MayBee | August 17, 2008 at 02:13 PM
Nah, he's gonna swim fly in there somewhere.
Posted by: Paul | August 17, 2008 at 03:06 PM
Just saw an interview and she didn't totally deny that she might keep swimming. Imagine her at 46 in the Olympics.
Posted by: sylvia | August 17, 2008 at 03:14 PM
That's an interview with Dara Torres.
Posted by: sylvia | August 17, 2008 at 03:15 PM
I fell very mightily in love with Dara. The perfect Olympian, gracious and modest. Also the perfect bod...
Posted by: Danube of Thought | August 17, 2008 at 03:30 PM
Just saw Dara interviewed by Jim Lampley, and the heartstrings fluttered even more uncontrollably.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | August 17, 2008 at 05:55 PM
JMH:
As a rather sad little coda, IMO, a reporter here at home asked Mark Spitz if he would be in Bejing to cheer the U.S. team on, and he replied that no one had invited him.
I read that a few days ago -- and thought Spitz came across as pretty petty. Not knowing the circumstances (did Spitz just sit by the phone waiting for a call without lifting a finger of his own?) it's hard to tell.
But when Sptiz was interviewed live with Phelps some time after Phelps won his seventh, Spitz was completely gracious.
Posted by: hit and run | August 17, 2008 at 06:58 PM
I had the exact same opinion of both events Hit.
Posted by: Jane | August 17, 2008 at 07:00 PM
hit:
I didn't see/hear anything other than the reported comment (related from a memory for which I cannot vouch!) so I don't know the background. I had a slightly mixed first reaction, but considering just how largely he figured in the story line as the potential has-been, I ended up feeling pretty sympathetic. IIRC, Spitz was always pretty gracious, and I'm not sure it's easy to hang around as a private citizen. It strikes me that you really see very few former medal winners doing so -- unless the press are just ignoring them -- which is rather a shame.
I, personally would love to see them (or coaches like Karolyi who was a breath of fresh air) doing a lot more commentary. Imagine Spitz interviewing Phelps, for instance! It would surely be a whole lot more interesting than listening to the back and forth with what's-her-name who has been posing the same pretty uninspired questions for days. Of course, if it turns out that she was once a champ herself, I'll have to revisit the concept.
Posted by: JM Hanes | August 17, 2008 at 07:59 PM
Slow or fast twitch.
Posted by: Lindak | August 17, 2008 at 09:13 PM
My wife is a master swimmer and she and her "swim nerd" friends think Phelps is going to be the first person to swim to Mars.
They remind me of my own chess nerd kiddom during the Bobby Fischer era. We all know how he turned out. I keep warning them, the glory of youth does not last. When Phelps gets a little older and stops burning those 12,000 calories a day after he's stuck in the habit of consuming them, things could turn ugly.
Posted by: Jim Glass | August 18, 2008 at 04:56 PM
I have it on good knowledge from a friend in the democratic party that Michael Phelps next career will be in synchronized swimming. His goal will be to do the standard 3 minute routine in 2'30" and win the singles, doubles, and relay. After this, he plans on entering rythmic gymnastics (either stick and hula hoop or running with ribbons) and finally curling so that he can win 86 medals, thereby bankrupting the IOC.
Posted by: matt | August 20, 2008 at 07:30 PM
If you want to consider the nuttiest thing we do in power generation right now, it's to use natural gas to run an electric power plant (built as a "peaking" plant but now running 365 days/year) during winter months and use it to run people's electric heat. When they could burn the gas directly in their furnaces and use like half of the amount of gas for the same amount of heat
Posted by: battery | December 30, 2008 at 02:37 AM