As I gear up for this weekend's cocktail party circuit I am busy prepping to rebut a big talking point from a certain slice of last weeks crowd, to wit - Sarah Palin wants creationism to be taught in schools.
Now, I could have gone to Charlie's helpful list debunking the Sarah Palin rumors and misinformation, where this topic appears at #186.
But since Google is my friend I quickly found this contemporaneous account of the debate that started it all; let's go to the Anchorage Daily News from Oct 27, 2006:
The volatile issue of teaching creation science in public schools popped up in the Alaska governor's race this week when Republican Sarah Palin said she thinks creationism should be taught alongside evolution in the state's public classrooms.
Palin was answering a question from the moderator near the conclusion of Wednesday night's televised debate on KAKM Channel 7 when she said, "Teach both. You know, don't be afraid of information. Healthy debate is so important, and it's so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both."
...
In an interview Thursday, Palin said she meant only to say that discussion of alternative views should be allowed to arise in Alaska classrooms:
"I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum."
She added that, if elected, she would not push the state Board of Education to add such creation-based alternatives to the state's required curriculum.
Members of the state school board, which sets minimum requirements, are appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Legislature.
"I won't have religion as a litmus test, or anybody's personal opinion on evolution or creationism," Palin said.
Seems innocuous enough, although there is plenty there for an Attack Dem.
Our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2ypVSYoEKA
Posted by: baked alaska | September 11, 2008 at 08:50 PM
Print it out and take it to the party, TM. They won't believe you otherwise.
Posted by: Porchlight | September 11, 2008 at 08:57 PM
Why is national service debate at Columbia?
No one will say volunteers should be paid a median wage. Army pays good why shouldn't other federal programs - unless it's Obama's draft. Trillions in foreign aid and not a median wage for a domestic?
Posted by: YoEKA | September 11, 2008 at 08:58 PM
Make that Attack DIM.
Posted by: Pofarmer | September 11, 2008 at 09:06 PM
Homer says "Duck and Cover!"
Posted by: watch?v | September 11, 2008 at 09:12 PM
I'm buying the NHL 2K9!!
Posted by: AtIM | September 11, 2008 at 09:14 PM
Believe South Park can handle the Russian navy?
Posted by: AtM | September 11, 2008 at 09:15 PM
I think you would be better advised to face the gin and tonic brigades by absorbing this mass of evidence of Sarah's stalwart opposition of the Bridge to Nowhere, provided by Lynn Sweet of the Chicago Tribune:
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | September 11, 2008 at 09:27 PM
I'm watching the 'Presidential Forum'. Is it just me, or is Barack's hair turning gray?
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | September 11, 2008 at 09:30 PM
Hilarious; in a response to a question about the Dems dissing small town mayors, Barack essentially admitted they did, and that they are like community organizers with real responsibilities such as filling potholes and hauling trash.
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | September 11, 2008 at 09:36 PM
In the hands of Charlie Gibson, the "exact words" will be something like: So, Sarah Palin, didn't you say God would strike down anyone who taught evolution in schools and God should strike them down and if He's too busy that you would be glad to do it for Him. How could anyone anywhere ever vote for you? Sorry we don't have time for your answer. That's all for tonight.
Posted by: Barry Dauphin | September 11, 2008 at 09:50 PM
One of Baked's many problems is that he is not only dishonest, he thinks he can roll in here with his dishonesty and no one will notice.
Her actual words were, "Pray for this country...that our leaders...are sending them on a task that is from God."
Liars don't fare well here at all, Baked. Pull your head out of your ass.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 11, 2008 at 09:55 PM
It's the Russyan Mob!!!
Posted by: Ak | September 11, 2008 at 09:55 PM
There are little better topics than evolution vs creationism to introduce the topic of theory of knowledge in science. I've had people admit that that is OK in philosophy class but not in biology class, but I don't get the distinction. It's about knowledge of science. It's a topic that can be understood by elementary as well as higher grades.
Because of the precept of separation of church and state, though, it is tough to get much support for its inclusion in public school curricula. This is a separate issue, in my opinion.
==================================
Posted by: kim | September 11, 2008 at 09:55 PM
Palin's cutting off foreign aid money!!!
Posted by: kxx | September 11, 2008 at 09:57 PM
National Service. Hah!
Somewhere, somehow, someone needs to remind people that the way a free market economy works is that price instant messages to everyone who is interested what needs to be done and what it is worth to have it done. It works at lightening speed, much faster than a government bureaucracy works. Hell, it doesn't need the overhead of a government bureaucracy to work.
And if the price is high enough, the job gets done. If it doesn't, perhaps the majority doesn't need to steal money from someone else to do it now.
And if there are people without jobs, then they need to consider moving to where jobs are available, or training to do the jobs that are available.
Posted by: sbw | September 11, 2008 at 09:57 PM
Our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God.
No, you idiot. She said: 'She also told the group that her eldest child, Track, would soon be deployed by the Army to Iraq, and that they should pray “that our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God, that’s what we have to make sure we are praying for, that there is a plan, and that plan is God’s plan.'
In other words, she's not saying the plan is from God, but rather that they should pray and hope that by making this decision they are doing what God would want.
See also her interview today.
"Pray not that God is on our side, ... but that we are on God's side." — Lincoln
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | September 11, 2008 at 10:03 PM
Tom, you're linking comment #186, which is cut&paste of a letter that Anne Kilkenny is passing around; it's got several points at which it doesn't seem to fairly represent what was reported contemporaneously.
You want rumor #23, which links the NYT article I've quoted above.
The new version, which I'll finish Real Soon Now, will be linkable at the individual question level.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | September 11, 2008 at 10:06 PM
See also, re: BtN, Phil Kerpen's article at NRO Financial.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | September 11, 2008 at 10:10 PM
Amazingly fair review of Palin v. Gibson from Time.
Posted by: DebinNC | September 11, 2008 at 10:29 PM
I think the media folks are beginning to realize their bluff has been called.
Plus they have competition now.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | September 11, 2008 at 10:35 PM
Baked Alaska got caught (easily) in a lie, and has skulked off to come up with a new name. Who can blame him for feeling humiliated?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 11, 2008 at 10:38 PM
I'm watching the 'Presidential Forum'. Is it just me, or is Barack's hair turning gray?
No, it's whitewash.
Posted by: Mustang0302 | September 12, 2008 at 03:00 AM
I'm watching the 'Presidential Forum'. Is it just me, or is Barack's hair turning gray?
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | September 11, 2008 at 09:30 PM
Yep... at this rate it'll be white by inauguration day... :)
I think it's been helped along in the touch of gray department... so he doesn't look like a 14 yr old next to Biden. Or next to anyone for that matter.
And really doesn't it add about 10 yrs to him. At least a 'distinguished, man of the world' look? Instead of that of a fresh faced community organizer, applying for his first real job.
Posted by: rgaye | September 12, 2008 at 06:03 AM
Sarah Palin wants creationism to be taught in schools.
Tom, I hate to quibble but 186 is one place where it shows up in the comments on Palin Rumors list. I didn't read all the comments so it quite possibly could show up in several.
On the list of 71, at this posting, it's at 48 & 49.
Posted by: rgaye | September 12, 2008 at 06:11 AM
Sarah Palin wants creationism to be taught in schools.
Tom, I hate to quibble but 186 is one place where it shows up in the comments on Palin Rumors list. I didn't read all the comments so it quite possibly could show up in several.
On the list of 71, at this posting, it's at 48 & 49.
Posted by: rgaye | September 12, 2008 at 06:12 AM
Sarah Palin wants creationism to be taught in schools.
Tom, I hate to quibble but 186 is one place where it shows up in the comments on Palin Rumors list. I didn't read all the comments so it quite possibly could show up in several.
On the list of 71, at this posting, it's at 48 & 49.
Posted by: rgaye | September 12, 2008 at 07:27 AM
" "I won't have religion as a litmus test, or anybody's personal opinion on evolution or creationism," Palin said.
Seems innocuous enough, although there is plenty there for an Attack Dem."
Well then, let's see the list of books she would ban from public libraries, because you can't underestimate cravenness in a religious zealot.
The Scopes Trial is on the record.
Posted by: Semanticleo | September 12, 2008 at 08:12 AM
Ban books? I wouldn't monkey around with that.
Posted by: Mustang0302 | September 12, 2008 at 08:16 AM
Hey, Leo, that plane you're flying is so far out of the OODA loop that the smoke from its crash has quit rising. Are you salving your conscience about your loss of integrity by trying to look bad?
=================================
Posted by: kim | September 12, 2008 at 09:22 AM
Well then, let's see the list of books she would ban from public libraries
Let's see the list of books the Wasilla Librarian refused to put in them.
Posted by: Pofarmer | September 12, 2008 at 09:28 AM
GIBSON: And you didn’t say to yourself, “Am I experienced enough?
No Charlie. If I used your standard for quotes, I would have to say that it was Jimi Hendrix.
Posted by: Neo | September 12, 2008 at 09:30 AM