S Palin reads all the newspapers and K Lo pretends it's all good. Does someone have a good clip from the latest Sarah and Katie episode?
« Raising FDIC Insurance - Don't Underestimate The Power Of A Fig Leaf | Main | Que Passa, Or, What Will The Senate Pass? »
The comments to this entry are closed.
TCO (or was it TGO) posted a link to the UTube of this part of the interview..I agree with Lopez about it.
Niters.
Posted by: clarice | September 30, 2008 at 11:17 PM
Sarah n' Katie, BFF
Posted by: TGO | September 30, 2008 at 11:18 PM
I don't know how people can say Palin doubts the existence of dinosaurs. She's been giving them interviews for weeks.
Posted by: bgates | September 30, 2008 at 11:29 PM
Red State Update on the Bailout.
LUN
Posted by: Pofarmer | September 30, 2008 at 11:30 PM
Clarice
Me too. What Katie wanted her to say was "Oh, I read the New York Times just. like. you. Katie...because I can't function or
take my marching orders and shape my news coveragelive without knowing what the elitist pigs at the NYT says I should do or think!"Awesome.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | September 30, 2008 at 11:32 PM
At the very end, Lou Dobb's snarks on Joe Biden's massive amounts of GAFFES and makes fun of Situation Room
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | September 30, 2008 at 11:35 PM
ts9-
I think you mean the elitists at NRO.
Seriously, she could have said the WSJ, NatReview or WaTimes and it would have been just fine. But she gave a response not inconsistent with being an illiterate, so she's getting called on it.
And her response is reinforced by other portions of the interview, so it's not like this is a single smudge on an otherwise stellar performance. There's a pattern, and everyone can see it.
Posted by: TGO | September 30, 2008 at 11:40 PM
Yeah, I was disappointed with that answer, I wanted her to say something like
"Read a newspaper? Why would I do that? You folks all play so many games with the information that you put in there that it's impossible to find out what's going on from one of your dishonest pieces of left-wing tripe. I get my information from the internet."
Posted by: Greg Q | September 30, 2008 at 11:45 PM
It's a badge of honor for Palin to have avoided mentioning the NY Times by name. And bonus points for dodging the spear -- er, question -- so gracefully so many times.
I dropped my subscription to the Times so long ago I have forgotten how long it has been -- but that doesn't mean I don't read a NYT article when someone recommends it to me.
The best answer to Katie is, "I get my news from many sources -- just like you."
Posted by: sbw | September 30, 2008 at 11:56 PM
Does anybody else find this line of questioning weird?? I did not watch the clip, but I commend Palin for this answer. This deflected and prevented a nuisance follow up. If she said "Anchorage Times" or something like that she would be ridiculed. If she answered a journal that Couric knew, the follow up would be to comment on an article in it. I think the press is starting to overplay their hand on Palin. I get sick of every question looking for an angle to trip her up. How long was Obama on the campaign trail before he would take a hostile interview.
Now I am in no way saying she looked good in the interview, and I do not claim that she is an intellectual heavyweight. Quite frankly she repeats too many words, and use too many cliched phrases. But this is a woman who defeated an entrenched governor, negotiated a new deal with the oil companies, and got a project at least moving that had been stalled. This is a woman who won her governorship after 23 debates.
I am thinking what has hurt Sarah Palin, is trying too hard not to mess up. She has been coached to death. Her answers sound like trying hard to remember all the various talking points that were crammed into her. She was loved on the convention stage because she looked so real and genuine. The combo of her handlers and the completely hostile press has robbed her of this. It would be great if she pulled of a tremendous debate performance, but right now I am not hopeful. She just does not know how to be herself anymore, and it also just might be that her true self is truly not up to the job.
Posted by: John Hansen | October 01, 2008 at 12:00 AM
"How long was Obama on the campaign trail before he would take a hostile interview."
Obama has had a hostile interview? Do you have a link?
Posted by: Antimedia | October 01, 2008 at 12:08 AM
I wanted her to say something like
Yeah, and I wish I had a fleet of Barchetta's, but things are what they are.
it also just might be that her true self is truly not up to the job.
Finally, something here that has the ring of truth to it. You guys may be forced to accept the conceit that she's had her 'true essence' diluted, but the reason she's been overprepped is that her handlers are truly terrified of what they're seeing in their one on one's with her.
They prep her because the alternative is too horrible to consider.
Posted by: TGO | October 01, 2008 at 12:09 AM
TGO, may not be TCO, but it's still an idiot.
Posted by: Pofarmer | October 01, 2008 at 12:14 AM
Joe Biden just makes crap up and the Obama campaign just has no answer for it - PREP!
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 12:18 AM
The answers suggest too much trying to avoid some mistake or gotcha. Better to say what she reads and leave it at that. Politicians dodge questions all the time. There are better ways to handle that type of question. But she has had numerous debates in running for public office. She needs to stop running the four corners offense and drive for the hoop.
Posted by: Barry Dauphin | October 01, 2008 at 12:20 AM
Nancy Pelosi is proving herself completely unqualified to lead anything. I wouldn’t trust her to lead a troop of Girl Scouts.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 12:21 AM
She needs to stop running the four corners offense and drive for the hoop
Unfortunately that was her drive to the hoop.
Posted by: TGO | October 01, 2008 at 12:23 AM
John-
How long was Obama on the campaign trail before he would take a hostile interview.
It had been a while, and I forget the exact situation (Rezko or Wright), but he answered "something like 8 questions"? Some of them might have been considered fast pitch softball.
I'm still waiting for those breathless reports about Obama buying his house with convicted felon and Chicago-Syrian fixer Rezko, but I'll have to be satisifed with NBC's CEO making Obama campaign video's reprising "Tomorrow Belongs to Me" complete with the O-salute.
Posted by: RichatUF | October 01, 2008 at 12:34 AM
Hardly, TOGA.
Whatever the merits or demerits of our elected officials, the idea that someone could become governor of a state after that many debates and challenge entrenched interests but for it to be "too horrible to consider" her answers without prep is the mark of someone not serious, just someone trying to yank chains.
Posted by: Barry Dauphin | October 01, 2008 at 12:37 AM
"something like 8 questions"
Much like his important waffle he said:
'Guys, I mean come on. I just answered like eight questions."
I guess a few too many for the Telepromter Prez.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 12:43 AM
Some of them might have been considered fast pitch softball.
Certainly nothing like the mind-bendingly soul-crushingly difficult puzzlers like 'what papers do you read?'
A question truly forged on Satan's unholy anvil, my friends.
Posted by: TGO | October 01, 2008 at 12:44 AM
Here is video of Obama afraid to answer questions on Rezko
chaos.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 12:46 AM
Rich - it wasn't that Jeff Zucker.
Posted by: bgates | October 01, 2008 at 12:48 AM
It would be charitable to say one reads the Times; but considering they've gotten one story in 10 right about her neck of the woods; where the information is available through basic public records searches (debate clip, public hearings etc) The Washington Post; 1-8; the Anchorage Times,
1-12. News Weak 1-15.Imagine how much they get wrong in a foreign land with different language and cultures (Although the Times probably thinks Afghanistan is less exotic than Alaska) Having Serpent Head, the down scale Democratic version of Rove; trashing Sarah, while he shepherded this 'fat.
lecherous hillbilly' for two terms; I know he's less loathesome than the community agitator from Hyde Park, is the height of hypocrisy. Et tu Howard Dean; seriously considered until his Edward Munsch moment.
The things we care about, military preparedness,missile defense,the struggle against Islamic extremism, a good business environment with elements of reform, ethical and moral values; are things the Times, CBS, NewWeek et al; don't care about; and it shows in their funhouse mirror coverage.
Posted by: narciso | October 01, 2008 at 12:52 AM
Here's video of Obama's boy Blagojevich Speechless trying to explain his bribe money/a> that Obama house purchaser Rezko, who is apparently is singing to the Feds.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 12:52 AM
ts9-
Wow. Powerful stuff. I hope your guy does a $100m media buy based on that footage alone.
Posted by: TGO | October 01, 2008 at 12:56 AM
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 01:03 AM
From the Drudge Report:
"VP DEBATE MODERATOR RELEASING 'AGE OF OBAMA' BOOK ON INAUGURATION DAY"
Hardly an impartial person to moderate the single Vice Presidential Debate.
LUN
Posted by: Barbara | October 01, 2008 at 01:03 AM
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 01:04 AM
ts9-
Here's a hint- if shady business deals mattered to the public, Bush and Cheney wouldn't be in the Whitehouse, Stevens wouldn't be running for re-election in Alaska, and Reagan's 'arms for hostages' would have brought down his presidency.
For whatever reason, people don't care about this stuff unless it's really blatantly obvious, as in they haul your sorry ass off to prison (as in Randy Cunningham's case.)
It's why the Dems don't bother bringing up the Keating 5 stuff, because people really don't care. Not sure why, maybe they assume that all pols have their hands in the cookie jar to one degree or another.
But that's just the way it looks to me.
Posted by: TGO | October 01, 2008 at 01:08 AM
Obama's ever changing christianist logo -- it's like play dough!
and
“I don’t think me calling House Republican members would have been that helpful, I tend not to be that persuasive on that side of the aisle.
He tends not to be persuasive?
That's change and INSPIRING and Presidential!
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 01:10 AM
uh oh--Rezko singing like a bird
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 01:16 AM
Attorneys believe Rezko is talking to prosecutors
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 01:18 AM
It's why the Dems don't bother bringing up the Keating 5 stuff, because people really don't care.
Or it could be because McCain was found completely innocent you friggin maroon.
Posted by: Pofarmer | October 01, 2008 at 01:20 AM
fortunately, TGO, the majority of americans are not, like you, snotty elitists.
and here's the thing: whatever newspapers you happen to read, you still manage to be a profoundly ignorant person.
Posted by: ex-democrat | October 01, 2008 at 01:22 AM
For whatever reason, people don't care about this stuff unless it's really blatantly obvious, as in they haul your sorry ass off to prison (as in Randy Cunningham's case.)
Nice goalposts asshole...Ted Stevens
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 01:23 AM
Further to Barbara's link about Gwen Ifill's book, "The Breakthrough: Race and Politics in the Age of Obama", the book has generated several thoughtful discussions on its Amazon page. Such as:
Why did Matt Drudge choose the homosexual lifestyle?
Why is GOP propaganda created by a homosexual - Drudge?
Drudge is gay but promotes someone who believes he's a sin
Are all the top GOP propagandists homosexuals?
I'll confess I had never given a moment's thought to Matt Drudge's sexuality. I can't say that anonymous hateful commenters have convinced me he's gay, and I can't say I care one way or the other. It's good to know where the opposition stands, though.
Posted by: bgates | October 01, 2008 at 01:29 AM
Oh, it's just sweet, sweet, sweet to see Obama hired trolls roll back the 'corruption charge and rewrite the meaning of corruption.
I guess when Democrats are chest deep in shit in the Fannie Mae rape of taxpayer corruption they move the goalposts .../No corruption here and does it really matter?
Yeah asshole, it does. Cunningham was a fucked head who took bribes to enrich HIMSELF!
Obama's advisor's PAID BRIBES TO ENRICH THEMSELVES! TAXPAYER DOLLARS TO BRIBE DEMOCRATS AND ENRICH THEMSELVES.
To your chagrin, it's sinking in.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 01:30 AM
Althouse uses Google's 2001 index to good effect, but I think we can use it more profitably.
Open sesame!
Posted by: Elliott | October 01, 2008 at 01:32 AM
Tops,
Re: Obama not calling Republicans, I wonder how many of his superdelegate supporters voted against it.
Posted by: Elliott | October 01, 2008 at 01:35 AM
I wonder how many of his superdelegate supporters voted against it.
Little man diplomacy.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 01:39 AM
Elliott-
Thanks for that! This is a good one:
Of course the page is gone.
Posted by: MayBee | October 01, 2008 at 01:44 AM
Obama failed. All talk. All changing positions. No leadership.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 01:56 AM
This is fun! January 5, 2000
Open forum
Posted by: MayBee | October 01, 2008 at 01:59 AM
What is the New Party? How long has Barack been a Democrat?
Posted by: MayBee | October 01, 2008 at 02:07 AM
MayBee
And Sarah Palin is bad mother.
He decided not to fly home alone, which would have meant leaving his wife back in Hawaii to care for the sick child.
and all the feminists went "ahhhhhh" because obviously Michelle Obama was at a loss without the Messiah!
WTF?
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 02:12 AM
Isn't that weird, tops? But he missed an important gun control vote. Suspicious...
Here he is in 1996
13TH DISTRICT
Democrat: Barack Obama. Supports gay rights, same-sex marriage; increased AIDS funding, abortion rights, affirmative action. Endorsed by IFHR, IMPACT, IVI-IPO, Illinois and Chicago NOW, Personal PAC.
---
He now says he doesn't support same-sex marriage or AA.
Posted by: MayBee | October 01, 2008 at 02:19 AM
The clip makes it obvious that she is being sarcastic to Couric and mocking Couric for trying to mock her by stereotyping her as some kind of illiterate hick from Alaska. Listen to the tone she uses to Couric. Couric is the one who ends up looking the fool.
You can view the entire interview HERE and read along with the transcript.
Couric is as vapid as they come.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 01, 2008 at 02:22 AM
Obama said he was never objected to Nuclear waste- a gaffe the media would mock FOREVER had Palin said it.
So essentially Obama just says the good lies? Lies, shameful lies, but lies we are supposed to lie for.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | October 01, 2008 at 02:29 AM
In an interview this week, Palin's father said that from 3rd grade on, when he grabbed the sports page she grabbed the front page and poured over every article. And her sister and her best friend, when asked by Greta what the remember most about Sarah while growing up, they said she always had a book with her, she is an avid reader. Everyone they interviewed about her had one thing they all said, she is very smart, and a very fast learner.
Do not fall into the trap of the left and the media by allowing them to define Sarah Palin in their image of her. And like her Dad and Todd warned, don't ever underestimate her.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 01, 2008 at 02:31 AM
Maybee: Via Wiki:
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 01, 2008 at 02:36 AM
My son giggled at Sarah's rambling answer, but I agree I would have my back up if Katie Couric asked me what I read to "inform my world view".
I don't know if people from big metropolitan areas understand what a hot button that is for people from smaller areas. I remember the first time my MIL came to visit my family's house from the larger city in the state. She was surprised we had our own stations and news anchors and everything.
Posted by: MayBee | October 01, 2008 at 02:37 AM
Thanks Sarah. That's interesting, isn't it? Just 12 years ago...
Posted by: MayBee | October 01, 2008 at 02:38 AM
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php%3Fid%3D26913&usg=AFQjCNEHZ7CH96CEqWbk8EKrT3wAclYTOA" class="l">Obama and the New Party - HUMAN EVENTS
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 01, 2008 at 02:42 AM
Using this cache">http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegate-endorsement-notes.html&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us">cache of super delegate endorsements by date* from Dem Convention Watch, I found 17 representatives who had endorsed Obama prior to March of this year but voted against the rescue plan:
Obama only needed to persuade 12 of them. And, there were plenty more no voters who endorsed Obama before June.
_________________
*Dem Convention Watch switched from blogspot to a different domain (which currently redirects to Google) and the links are problematic.
**I'm don't think that every date listed on at Dem Convention Watch is the precise date of endorsement.
Posted by: Elliott | October 01, 2008 at 02:49 AM
I had that experience with a friend who stopped to visit us in Indiana on her way back to her home in Manhattan. She was surprised that we not only had more choices in TV coverage, including all the New York stations as well as national and our own local. When she said she didn't know if she could stand not having her New York papers, I called up the NYT website and showed her I could read her paper as well as my own every day and then read the papers from Atlanta, Washington, Miami, Los Angeles, Chicago and all major foreign cities too. I was shocked at how ill informed she was, but then she didn't "have time" for computers. I think I finally got to her when I showed her how I could log into art galleries, historical archives almost anywhere, and libraries any time the mood struck me to do some research.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 01, 2008 at 02:56 AM
Frankly, I think it would be more instructive and consequential to know what the hell Katie Couric and her ilk read.
If I were asked such a question, I wouldn't even know where to start, and if I were a politician, I'd hardly want to endorse some, or maybe even any, of them by mentioning them -- or have to leave the bulk of what I do read out in order to point to two or three. Do sites sites like Google News even count as "newspapers" these days? Can't you just imagine the hoots 'n hollers would have greeted that answer? Sheesh.
I'm really sick of all the stupidity, and the silly questions. If Couric actually expected to learn anything, it only confirms that we divide newspapers up ideologically. The idea that Palin couldn't answer Couric's question because she probably never reads a paper is beyond idiotic. Who are these people?
Posted by: JM Hanes | October 01, 2008 at 03:02 AM
Tops and MayBee,
Good to have you both on the case. Can you be sure to bookmark and/or save anything of interest that you come across? If Google makes that feature unavailable it might be difficult to find some of that stuff again.
Posted by: Elliott | October 01, 2008 at 03:03 AM
Boston Globe Leads With a Lie -- Debunked Palin Rape Kit Story Raised Again
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 01, 2008 at 03:23 AM
Rush ahead in cash race:
Anyone know anything about the Community Bankers Association of Illinois? Did they like Obama or did they really not like Bobby Rush?
Posted by: Elliott | October 01, 2008 at 03:25 AM
Are you people this stupid? she is a governor of a state. you think she doesn't stay current on events? We know for a fact she reads the SF paper. she even wrote to the editor:
Dear Editor,
San Francisco judges forbidding our Pledge of Allegiance? They will take the phrase "under God" away from me when my cold, dead lips can no longer utter those words. God Bless America.
Sarah Palin, Mayor, Wasilla, AK
Posted by: unseen | October 01, 2008 at 03:28 AM
and this letter to the editor of the ADN:
Consider the letter to Mike Doogan, then a columnist for the Anchorage Daily News.
Doogan had written in the paper on March 5, 2002, that lawmakers were considering moving the state legislature to Wasilla. “Now, I disrespect Wasilla as much as the next guy, but this seems a little extreme,” Doogan quipped. “Isn't being a blight on the landscape enough shame for Wasillians?”
Palin couldn’t resist. Two days later, she wrote a personal letter that simply said:
“Dear Mr. Doogan: Why do you do what you do to Wasilla?”
She signed it, “Respectfully, Sarah.”
Posted by: unseen | October 01, 2008 at 03:30 AM
then there is this video. About a minute into the video is a filming of Palin in her office. Notice the NEWSPAPER on her desk.
Idiots. do some research for once.
http://www.jewishjournal.com/video/article/video_israeli_documentary_director_elan_frank_shoots_sarah_palin_20080923/
And Oh My GOd she knows how to work a computer too. and she can handle TWO BLACKBERRIES.
Posted by: unseen | October 01, 2008 at 03:35 AM
and if you watch that video she walks to the busstop everyday and picks Piper up from the bus. and she breastfeeds Trig. And people think she is stupid? give me a break. Yuo try running a state breastfeeding a baby and finding the time picking up a 7 year old from school bus everyday.
Posted by: unseen | October 01, 2008 at 03:44 AM
Via Byron York:
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 01, 2008 at 03:56 AM
New Obama Logo Has Star and Crescent
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 01, 2008 at 04:15 AM
Debate Moderator Author of Pro-Obama Book
Read it and weep.
Posted by: M. Simon | October 01, 2008 at 05:36 AM
"It's why the Dems don't bother bringing up the Keating 5 stuff, because people really don't care."
In effect you are saying that Democrats have a criminal culture.
Posted by: PeterUK | October 01, 2008 at 07:31 AM
Palin should have replied: “I given up trying to get my news from the alphabet networks. I mean, you guys are so in the tank for Obama, it's pathetic. You don't even pretend to be objective. For example, how does Obama get away with this statement at the first presidential debate…
OBAMA: We hadn't finished the job in Afghanistan. We hadn't caught Bin Laden, we hadn't put, uh, Al-Qaeda to rest, and as a consequence, uh, I thought that it was going to be a distraction. Now, Senator McCain and President Bush had a very different judgment. We took our eye off the ball.
Took our eye off the ball? Everybody knows bin Laden and Al Qaeda escaped from Tora Bora into Pakistan in December 2001. The Iraq war didn't start until March 2003. al Qaeda did go into Iraq to try to prevent the establishment of a democracy there. But they've been defeated, and not just by Americans, but by Americans and Iraqis fighting together. So how does Obama get away with this “ eye off the ball” nonsense? Al Qaeda hasn't been in Afghanistan since 2001.
He wants us to invade Pakistan, and make a bad situation worse by turning an ally- which has its own challenges- against us.
No Katie, I get my news from Fox NEWS and JustOneMinute blog. Even with O'Reilly tacking left they are the only network that even attempts to be fair and balanced. At Fox News you get the opinions of Bill Kristol and Juan Williams.
And the commenters at JustOneMinute are brilliant. Except for the odd one that's baked.
I'll end this by asking you a question: how many on camera employees of CBS support the GOP?
Posted by: Terry Gain | October 01, 2008 at 07:55 AM
Charlie Martin, would you "Truth or Fiction" unseen for us, please?
Posted by: sbw | October 01, 2008 at 07:55 AM
I think Palin has learned to recognize where the landmines are buried. She just refused to step on one in order to pass Katie's "test".
Posted by: SunnyDay | October 01, 2008 at 08:03 AM
ooopsie - taking the link out.
Posted by: SunnyDay | October 01, 2008 at 08:03 AM
M. Simon: NO. Gwen Ifill should read and weep. Trouble comes in threes.
1. She fell and broke her leg
2. She is splashed large on Drudge
3. ...
There is always a three. Let's just wait and see what it may be.
Posted by: centralcal | October 01, 2008 at 08:10 AM
I'll end this by asking you a question: how many on camera employees of CBS support the GOP?
They're looking. They're looking.
Posted by: M. Simon | October 01, 2008 at 10:19 AM
"Yuo (sic) try running a state breastfeeding a baby and finding the time picking up a 7 year old from school bus everyday".
Joe Biden could do that standing on his head.
Posted by: PeterUK | October 01, 2008 at 10:29 AM
If asked directly he would confirm he's already done it.
Posted by: bad | October 01, 2008 at 10:36 AM
Elliott-
Apparently, Barack Obama was on a committee to celebrate Black Harvard Alumni in 2000, with William Jefferson and Franklin Raines.
Here'spart of his bio:
n 1992, Senator Obama served as Illinois Executive Director of PROJECT VOTE!, an effort that added over 100,000 newly registered voters in Illinois. ...
[State] Senator Obama serves on the boards of several organizations including the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, where he is chairman, the Joyce Foundation, the Woods Fund of Chicago, the Center for Neighborhood Technology, the Chicago Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under the Law, and Public Allies.
Posted by: MayBee | October 01, 2008 at 11:16 AM
The Obamas and Public Allies.
The media that is avidly researching whether Palin really could see Russia from Alaska, has no interest in Obama's direct connection to the radical Public Allies.
Posted by: DebinNC | October 01, 2008 at 11:31 AM
http://web.archive.org/web/20011205185920/www.chi-challenge.org/home.htm>Chicago Annenberg Challenge Website
Posted by: MayBee | October 01, 2008 at 11:41 AM
Kindernacht Pulled, Apparently in Disgrace
Kindernacht is that creepy video of the children singing
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 01, 2008 at 11:50 AM
From that link, Small Schools Workshops info:
The Small Schools Workshop is a group of educators, organizers and researchers based in the College of Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The Small Schools Workshop collaborates with teachers, principals, and parents to create new, small, innovative learning communities in public schools. In addition to our interest in individual schools, the Small Schools Workshop actively explores the larger issues of education reform, with a particular focus on the role that small schools can have in furthering positive whole-school and systemic change.
Posted by: MayBee | October 01, 2008 at 11:50 AM
Hmmm. One">http://www.chi-challenge.org/granters.htm#ADDITIONAL%20GRANTS">One hand pays the other. John Ayers is Bill Ayers son.
Posted by: sbw | October 01, 2008 at 12:00 PM
This isn't huge, but http://web.archive.org/web/20010124111600/www.catalyst-chicago.org/10-99/109prom.htm>Michelle Obama on a planning committee for Catalyst's 10 year anniversary prom with Susan Klonsky and John Ayres in 2000.
Posted by: MayBee | October 01, 2008 at 12:03 PM
Consider the first paragraph of this AP Article:
But, if one reads on, it's clear Sarah knew well of what she spoke:
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | October 01, 2008 at 12:14 PM
Perhaps she was thinking about the fact that:
Alaska is the first line of defense in our missile interceptor defense system. The 49th Missile Defense Battalion of the Alaska National Guard is the unit that protects the entire nation from ballistic missile attacks. It’s on permanent active duty, unlike other Guard units.
U.S. Northern Command brought the 100th Missile
Defense Brigade (Ground-Based Midcourse Defense) to operational level for the first time in response to the July 2006 North Korean missile crisis. Previously maintained in test mode, the brigade, headquartered at Colorado Springs, Colorado, and its 49th Missile Defense Battalion
(Ground-Based Missile Defense) at Fort Greely, Alaska, remained at high alert status for the duration of the crisis.
As governor of Alaska, Palin is briefed on highly classified military issues, homeland security, and counterterrorism.
She’s also the commander in chief of the Alaska State Defense Force (ASDF), a federally recognized militia incorporated into Homeland Security’s counterterrorism plans.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 01, 2008 at 01:11 PM
Michelle Obama in CO interview today:
Q: When it comes to the issues, where do you and your husband disagree?"
MO:"You know, Barack and I agree on everything that matters," Obama said. "At the foundation of Barack's campaign is the notion that we need to build an America that is just and is equal and that gives every American a real opportunity for a better chance at life."
......
Q:.. How would you maintain a sense of normalcy [for your children] for that?" London said.
MO:.. We need to make sure that there are millions of other kids who can live out their dreams as Malia and Sasha will and it is not based on luck. But it is based on fairness and justice in this country that is created.
Posted by: DebinNC | October 01, 2008 at 01:36 PM
Via Instapundit:
UPDATE: Speaking of double standards, Michael Silence observes:
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 01, 2008 at 02:51 PM
John Ayers is Bill Ayers son.
Aren't they brothers?
Posted by: bad | October 01, 2008 at 03:05 PM
There may be two. I googled and came up with son. Makes no nevermind to me. Giving either one $230,000 smells enough to be worthy of note.
Posted by: sbw | October 01, 2008 at 03:11 PM
Speaking of a brother the MSM has no interest in... Palin's family must be the most ethical people on earth since we haven't heard about them.
Posted by: DebinNC | October 01, 2008 at 03:19 PM
Giving either one $230,000 smells enough to be worthy of note.
Word.
Posted by: bad | October 01, 2008 at 03:27 PM
Debbie,
Hedge fund groups. Figures.
Posted by: Sue | October 01, 2008 at 03:31 PM
I skipped over this one the first time as a nothingburger, but the incessant repetition in the media is getting ridiculous. (I just heard it twice on NPR on a relatively short drive to the store.)
There's obviously no right answer to that question (i.e., downhome newspapers=hick; NYT and WSJ=liar; stumbling=doesn't read), and I can't believe it's an accident that it recalls disproven hick/unread/book banning memes. Not sure how an attempted "gotcha" by Couric is indicative of anything other than her ability to remember someone else's talking point (I seriously doubt she came up with it herself). Palin's recognition of it as a gotcha isn't newsworthy, as it was pretty darned obvious. Her unwillingness to fall into the trap is also boring, and I suspect her talking around the subject was as or more graceful than Obama or Biden could manage in a similar off-the-cuff response.
But it's funny to see the media types fall all over themselves to prove something with a failed gotcha. My inclination is to think she must not've done too bad.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | October 02, 2008 at 11:40 AM