The Captain is pretty funny - in their press release reacting to the AIG takeover, Team Obama can't even get the right name for AIG. They must have put this release together at 4 AM, after the euphoria of the 3 AM phone call wore off.
The Captain's main point is well-taken - McCain was leading the 2005 charge for Fannie Mae reform while Obama was cashing checks from Fannie's supporters.
Careful NEO the left will start calling you a liar...
Posted by: GMax | September 18, 2008 at 03:45 PM
Okay, I may be closer.
Posted by: Jane | September 18, 2008 at 03:59 PM
to what?
Posted by: GMax | September 18, 2008 at 04:03 PM
My pleasure, Clarice. Thought it was the perfect topping to the anti-troll software talk.
Posted by: Rickter | September 18, 2008 at 04:04 PM
Wow +401 on the Dow and S&P 500 and Nasdaq even higher % gains. That will cut the trolls giggling while gravedancing down to size.
Posted by: GMax | September 18, 2008 at 04:08 PM
Jane:
LOL! It's amazing how much people who know what they're doing can leave out, when trying to explain it to someone who thinks they are speaking a foreign language!
My husband and I spent the first several years of our marriage in a remote, mountain-ringed valley in the southwestern outback of Virginia. He travelled a lot on business which meant I was on my own quite a bit. There was a state prison in the next valley over, and early on, while my husband was away, a couple of major bad guys escaped. After a series of freaky little things happened that night, I called him to ask where he kept his pistol(s). He had strong box with two guns (picture a shoot out in a spaghetti western) and bullets in assorted sizes, which I located and then called him back so he could explain what I needed to do.
He had married me straight out of Manhattan, and I had only just begun to acquire my huntin' & fishin' skilz at the time, so the conversation which ensued was pretty hilarious. Finally he said, "Look, don't put any bullets in the gun, just hide them in a safe place. The guy you're pointing it at has no way of knowing whether it's loaded or not. If you cock it and accidentaly pull the trigger, just cock it again like that was the only empty chamber."
Posted by: JM Hanes | September 18, 2008 at 04:17 PM
"Mac boy" wins another round
... on second thought ...Posted by: Neo | September 18, 2008 at 04:23 PM
LOL! It's amazing how much people who know what they're doing can leave out, when trying to explain it to someone who thinks they are speaking a foreign language!
That is exactly what it is like. And when I try that stuff I immediately panic.
The other problem I have is I cannot read instructions. If you tell me what to do, like here, in conversation I can usually break it down, but give me a sheet of instructions and my eyes glaze over.
As for your gun analogy - the reason I never got a gun is that I am absolutely sure I would shoot someone.
Posted by: Jane | September 18, 2008 at 04:45 PM
to what?
At this point who knows, but I think to blocking the troll.
Posted by: Jane | September 18, 2008 at 04:46 PM
JMH, I really love that story, ROFLMAO..
Posted by: clarice | September 18, 2008 at 04:49 PM
JMHanes, and your pistola...
For the fun of it, invest a weekend at an L.L. Bean beginning flyfishing class. Invest another weekend in a rifle/pistol shooting class.
We are never so far from Mother Nature that we shouldn't be able to go back to our roots in an emergency. And if we don't ever need to use the lessons, if gives you confidence... and a nice warm memory to look back on.
Posted by: sbw | September 18, 2008 at 04:50 PM
Yay, Jane!
You can join JMH's classes for fun, too.
Posted by: sbw | September 18, 2008 at 04:52 PM
IT gives you confidence...
Posted by: sbw | September 18, 2008 at 04:52 PM
sbw:
That was long, long ago. I've been fly fishing and bird shooting ever since. In fact, there's a river in the NC mountains which is awfully close to the thing I miss about my marriage most. :-) False casting on the lawn is also great if you find yourself seriously keyed up and overwrought.
Posted by: JM Hanes | September 18, 2008 at 05:02 PM
I'm not worried about learning how to shoot, I'm worried about getting so mad I'd shoot someone. Back then, I owned a 2 family house that I lived in. I had a tenant - highly recommended, who turned out to be a crack dealer. He refused to leave when the lease was up and was destroying the victorian I had rehabbed.
The worse part was I lived upstairs and had to pass his apt to get home. I filed suit to get him out, and was scared every day that he was gonna do something. Someone suggested I get a gun. I knew I was so angry, and scared, that if I did, I would shoot him.
Posted by: Jane | September 18, 2008 at 05:02 PM
Probably best, Jane. If you're going to handle a gun, it's better to shoot it often enough so that you're not terrified of handling it, and can do so with compentence, and, oddly enough, with safety in mind.
Posted by: JM Hanes | September 18, 2008 at 05:17 PM
Jane & JMH. Shoulda known! JOMers have good sense.
Posted by: sbw | September 18, 2008 at 07:30 PM
Ah! Let's have a moment of silence for (from) Semanticleo.
...
He mistook continuous misrepresentation and putdown for dialog.
Amen!
Posted by: sbw | September 18, 2008 at 07:35 PM
sbw:
I'm still open to any other suggestions someone with as much good sense as you've got might make!
Posted by: JM Hanes | September 18, 2008 at 07:49 PM
Fox reporting more than Sarah's email was hacked--her family members and staff emails were hacked, too.
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/18/hacker-claims-to-have-tricked-yahoo-to-gain-password-to-palin-e-mail/>Tricksters
Posted by: clarice | September 18, 2008 at 07:54 PM
Where fundamentals are concerned, Fox News reported that someone named J.D. Foster (at Heritage) offered this timely reminder:
.Posted by: JM Hanes | September 18, 2008 at 08:05 PM
JMH, I'm the one that's amazed. I've learned more over the last few days than I thought possible about tranches and selling naked shorts.
People around here know their sh*t. And more importantly, they know when they don't know it, and ask.
Posted by: sbw | September 18, 2008 at 08:32 PM
I like short shorts better than naked shorts--dependin' on whom is wearing 'em.
Posted by: bad | September 18, 2008 at 11:58 PM
Sobbering ?
Seems like somebody has an idea of what to do.
Posted by: Neo | September 19, 2008 at 01:12 AM
Yeah. The grownups called the kids into the room and read them the riot act.
Posted by: JM Hanes | September 19, 2008 at 01:39 AM
There goes that recess. And they will have to vote, too.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads aka Vnjagvet | September 19, 2008 at 02:10 AM
Latest on young popcorn. Mike Kernell denied last night that the authorities had been in touch with his son. But according to the Memphis Flyer, local FBI confirms that it has been in touch with the FBI Anchorage office.
Seems like they're getting their ducks in a row before they knock on that door.
LUN
Posted by: J Verner | September 19, 2008 at 08:14 AM
"Morning Guys,
McCain needs some of that fighter pilot action on this mortgage crisis and fast. I hope they regrouped yesterday. If not, they better and fast/"
World markets are recovering nicely and the US stock market futures are up in a big way. McCain has recovered somewhat on Intrade and Obama's recent "economy bounce" might already be fading. I think the slide in the tracking polls should start leveling off. Let's see.
Posted by: ben | September 19, 2008 at 09:08 AM
This might be one of the few situations where openly doing something about a problem is better than talking it up or down.
Yanking the economy back from the brink looks a lot like grownups taking charge. Being part of the fix adds credibility when it's time for some 'splaining, Lucy.
Posted by: boris | September 19, 2008 at 09:21 AM
WaPo has an editorial this morning saying Obama's ad lies when it says McCain was always only for deregulation and notes that he was for tighter controls on Fannie Mae AND the claim that McCain is surrounded by those responsible considering who is close to Obama.
Posted by: clarice | September 19, 2008 at 09:24 AM
It's a loser. You guys are arguing about minutia, when McCain has had several days to speak out against Bush bailouts and keep the REpublican principles. Heck, most of you all do not keep those principles. You might as well be Democrats. You damage both the country and the Republican brand by rolling over so easy.
Let the banks fail. Chapter 11 works just fine. It keeps creditors at bay. And it is much fairer to let counterparties and speculators and investors take losses than to raid my all cash portfolio to pay for other people's losses.
It amazes me that I have to argue FOR the free market with supposed Republicans.
Posted by: TCO | September 20, 2008 at 05:33 AM
Most people in the country feel similar to me as well. There is a lot of popular discomfort with the bailouts.
Posted by: TCO | September 20, 2008 at 05:34 AM
It amazes me that I have to argue FOR the free market with supposed Republicans.
I know the Dems made out pretty well with the crash of '29, but do you really think a depression is necessary in order to win an election?
There is a lot of popular discomfort with the bailouts.
Tell it to your (Dem) congressman. Then ask him or her how this happened. Then try to justify having one of them "investigate" this . . . or electing one president.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | September 20, 2008 at 06:11 AM
You're pathetic:
Money doesn't grow on trees. Money from the government comes from taxes or inflation. It's incredible that I have to explain this to a supposed Republican. People who made bad investments are being made whole by people who did not.
Grow a nutsac. Stiffen your spine. Stop whining about the depression, you think is going to happen and stand strong for the free market.
Posted by: TCO | September 20, 2008 at 06:28 AM
The financial sector can (and should) take a huge shellacking. And a bunch of people (in blue New York) would lose jobs. But we have too many people in the financial sector anyhow. Don't worry, there would still be someone left to charge you commissions if you want to buy stocks.
Posted by: TCO | September 20, 2008 at 06:34 AM
I think you missed a point, TCO; this wasn't a free market. It was encumbered such that criminals could take advantage of it.
Go straighten out Jolliffe. There's criminals over there, too.
======================================
Posted by: kim | September 20, 2008 at 07:20 AM
People who made bad investments are being made whole by people who did not.
People who made a bad law are now bailing out those they forced to make bad loans. (They also milked the loan guarantors for millions in campaign contributions whilst resisting regulatory reform. They also all have a (D) after their names, and reside in Congress.)
Grow a nutsac. Stiffen your spine.
Again, tell it to your Dem congressman. They control the purse strings, so as long as they don't go along with it, a bailout is impossible. But you're pretty sure that ain't gonna happen, aren't you? And that we can blame this all on the Administration, and not the party whose brilliant oversight (e.g., "These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis") enabled this nonsense in the first place.
Stop whining about the depression, you think is going to happen and stand strong for the free market.
If you're seriously suggesting GSEs remotely resemble a free market, then you don't understand how they work.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | September 20, 2008 at 10:02 AM
Whoa, Cecil, maybe you should go straighten out Tamino, and Mann, and Hansen, and Gore. There's plenty more over there, too.
======================================
Posted by: kim | September 20, 2008 at 10:04 AM
Bush has the ability to NOT bail out people. He is doing the WRONG thing economically and morally. And it will KILL the Republican brand.
Have fun losing the election Democrats-lite.
Posted by: TCO | September 20, 2008 at 10:52 AM
Bush has the ability to NOT bail out people.
Yeah, sure, why even bother with that whole Constitution thing, when we can just blame "the party in power" and define that as the President? A prettier example of working backward from the desired conclusion would be hard to imagine.
What the President should have had is the ability to regulate GSEs. The fact that he did not is almost entirely due to a group of recalcitrant legislators who blocked meaningful reform:
And why they did it is obvious. Elizabeth Dole said it well: Dem congressmen started this mess, and are the responsible institution for the bailout. Blaming the President is a load of crap that just won't flush.Posted by: Cecil Turner | September 20, 2008 at 12:39 PM
As usual, a little historical perspective is in order.
LUN
Posted by: Pofarmer | September 20, 2008 at 01:06 PM
Bush is ingorning the constituiont when he has Paulson engineer bailouts and seizures. Leaders lead. The bailouts are now. He should hold firm instead of raping the taxpayers.
Posted by: TCO | September 20, 2008 at 02:01 PM
We all love game, if you want to play it, please cheap penya and join us.
Posted by: sophy | January 06, 2009 at 09:57 PM