If Obama becomes President his popularity will sag and he will make unpopular decisions widely viewed as unsound.
No, that's not my opinion. My source is the always entertaining Joe Biden, who seems intent on lowering expectations to the point that the nation will marvel if Obama has the competence and vision to remember to show up on Jan 20 to be sworn in.
"I promise you, you all are gonna be sitting here a year from now going, 'Oh my God, why are they there in the polls? Why is the polling so down? Why is this thing so tough?' We're gonna have to make some incredibly tough decisions in the first two years. So I'm asking you now, I'm asking you now, be prepared to stick with us. Remember the faith you had at this point because you're going to have to reinforce us."
"There are gonna be a lot of you who want to go, 'Whoa, wait a minute, yo, whoa, whoa, I don't know about that decision'," Biden continued. "Because if you think the decision is sound when they're made, which I believe you will when they're made, they're not likely to be as popular as they are sound. Because if they're popular, they're probably not sound."
I don't like the sound of that. The good decisions won't be popular? The suspense is killing me. And speaking of killing me, what about this fear-mongering from Biden?
"Mark my words," the Democratic vice presidential nominee warned at the second of his two Seattle fundraisers Sunday. "It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy."
"I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate," Biden said to Emerald City supporters, mentioning the Middle East and Russia as possibilities. "And he's gonna need help. And the kind of help he's gonna need is, he's gonna need you - not financially to help him - we're gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it's not gonna be apparent initially, it's not gonna be apparent that we're right."
Oh, great - so per Biden, after Obama gets the 3 AM phone call we will all think he blew it. I deplore this negative, attack-oriented campaigning. C'mon, Joe, give me a reason to Go With O!
Hmm - people deplored similar fear-mongering from Hillary and Rudy. Seasons change.
MORE: Jim Geraghty worries that the Senate won't be able to advise and consent in a crisis:
I'm hoping that, if Obama is elected, he nominates the best attorney general, secretary of state, secretary of defense, secretary of homeland security, etc., he can find. But if a crisis is unfolding, the Senate will probably be under enormous pressure to confirm the nominees and get them into their jobs as quickly as possible. That seems like less than ideal circumstances for the Senate to exercise appropriate scrutiny.
When did we expect scrutiny from Harry Reid and his 59 fellow Dems?
Jennifer Rubin has fun:
Well, golly, if Obama is so untested that we will have a series of international crises — at the very time we are in a financial meltdown — which will make the Cuban Missile Crisis look like a walk in the park, shouldn’t we vote for the other guy who will keep all the miscreants in their place? Now, maybe we should rest easy because, according to Biden, “I’ve forgotten more about foreign policy than most of my colleagues know, so I’m not being falsely humble with you.” (Maybe Hezbollah’s occupation of Lebanon was one of the things he forgot.)
The Captain reminds us of Kennedy's meeting with Krushchev "without preconditions":
What resulted? The Berlin Wall and the Cuban missile crisis. Kennedy wound up trading strategic intel and missile installations in western Asia in exchange for Soviet withdrawal of the nuclear missiles from Cuba. The entire Kennedy administration turned out to be a foreign-policy disaster that was only overlooked because of the tragic assassination of Kennedy in Dallas in 1963.
I agree with Biden. Obama is exactly like Kennedy in this regard, and our enemies will test us by threatening our interests around the globe if we elect Obama. I’d rather avoid the problem altogether and elect a man who puts enough fear into the minds of our enemies to keep them from testing us at all.
Biden is trying to put lipstick on the Bay of Pigs.
I thought Joe the Dumber was softening us up for the Nov. 5 announcement canceling the middle-class tax cut-- until he started going on about the Global Test.
Posted by: Paul Zrimsek | October 20, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Joe's laying the groundwork for impeachment.
==============================
Posted by: kim | October 20, 2008 at 11:09 AM
"Because if they're popular, they're probably not sound."
Does that apply to candidates as well?
Posted by: michaelt | October 20, 2008 at 11:10 AM
Woe Joe
Posted by: bad | October 20, 2008 at 11:10 AM
Feb 1, 2009. Two-way monitors are installed in every room of every home. The first image to come up: Joe Biden, saying, "See, I told you this wasn't going to be popular. But you voted for us. Now let me tell you about the summit we're convening to discuss what happened in New York. I'm thinking about popping up the gas tax to $5; it's good for the environment, and we can give the revenue to Iran to show there's no hard feelings."
Posted by: bgates | October 20, 2008 at 11:11 AM
Interesting campaign strategy.
Not 'are you better off today than you were four years ago?';
but 'you are going to be worse off four years from now than you are today.'
Posted by: Barney Frank | October 20, 2008 at 11:14 AM
A Rocky Road For Obma If Elected
Is 'Obma' a pigeon English reference to Barry's ACORN rent-a-mob connection?
Posted by: Barney Frank | October 20, 2008 at 11:17 AM
Biden's worries can be avoided if McCain utters the following words regarding Obama: "How is this guy qualified to be President?"
Oh, the mass gnashing of teeth. The hue and cry. The plaintive screeches of racism!
But not even his supporters can answer the question. Nobody can.
Posted by: Extraneus | October 20, 2008 at 11:22 AM
'you are going to be worse off four years from now than you are today.'
Finally, some honesty from the HObama campaign.
Beyond "Spread the wealth around."
Posted by: bad | October 20, 2008 at 11:22 AM
Come on Elana Schor .. show me the money .. and prove it.
Else you are a liar.
Posted by: Neo | October 20, 2008 at 11:27 AM
Ain't that the truth BGates.
Posted by: Jane | October 20, 2008 at 11:28 AM
Talk about chutzpah. With the election in the bag, Biden is now grooming a duped populace to ignore their lying eyes next Feb-July when DC statehood passes, abortions are paid for with public funds, the Marines are pulled out or Iraq in favor os Mogadishu II in Pakistan? And libs find Palin scary?
Posted by: DebinNC | October 20, 2008 at 11:43 AM
Isn't it clever of Joe to remind us as we sit in this seven year safety cocoon--that we are consideringinstalling in office at a very dangerous time a totally untested weakling on national defense.
"Gird your loins", Biden says..You betcha!
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 11:48 AM
That's not to mention the problems that are going to follow Obama into office of his own doing. Rezko and all the peculiarities surrounding his campaign financing to name just two. How many political pitfalls has Obama not avoided, but fallen into and been pulled back out of, that would have killed any mere mortal politician?
Posted by: Pofarmer | October 20, 2008 at 12:00 PM
Joe the Dumber. Serious laughing out loud!
Posted by: Sue | October 20, 2008 at 12:00 PM
Ryan Lizza on Joe Biden.
LUN
Extremely disappointing so far but I'll keep reading.
Posted by: bad | October 20, 2008 at 12:04 PM
Sue, I love Joe the Dumber.
Maybe for last minute entertainment we ought to propose a debate on the economy between the two Joes.
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 12:05 PM
Sounds like Joe is warning ... "Don't you dare stab us in the back like we did W!"
Posted by: boris | October 20, 2008 at 12:07 PM
Rush is starting off the week with Biden's "gird your loins".
Posted by: DebinNC | October 20, 2008 at 12:09 PM
We see things rather the same, it appears. What a dunce Biden is..
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 12:12 PM
Biden:
Ick
Posted by: bad | October 20, 2008 at 12:17 PM
God love ya, Joe!
Posted by: Chris | October 20, 2008 at 12:21 PM
More Biden: LUN
I have never, ever, ever screwed another senator,” he said.
I'll bet all senators are counting their lucky stars.
Posted by: bad | October 20, 2008 at 12:21 PM
**thanking**
Posted by: bad | October 20, 2008 at 12:22 PM
I have never, ever, ever screwed another senator,” he said.
Why so specific senator? Did you screw a congressperson?
Posted by: Sue | October 20, 2008 at 12:26 PM
More Biden:
“People point out the other mistakes that Presidents have made in the first hundred days,” he said. “I predict to you that Barack will not make them.”
Any need to gird our loins will be Hobama free.
LUN
Posted by: bad | October 20, 2008 at 12:27 PM
wouldn't it have been patriotic and "sound" to have supported President Bush's difficult decisions? and maybe a solid front against the world who takes and then complains could have "liked" us more? PLease, this guy is giving all democrats a warning-don't vote for us-we're going to screw you!
Posted by: glenda waggoner | October 20, 2008 at 12:30 PM
Boy, bad's Biden quote above directly contradicts Biden's debate putdown of Palin's answer to the VP's role question. Giddy at the chance to vilify Cheney, Biden angrily and wrongly claimed then that the VP has no legislative role as it's a solely Executive Branch position.
Posted by: DebinNC | October 20, 2008 at 12:32 PM
Maybe he didn't screw another Senator because his loins are always girded.
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 12:36 PM
The Lizza article on Biden talks a great deal about Sarah Palin.
Overall, the piece is very disappointing compared to Lizza's article on Obama.
Biden uses the word presumptuous a lot.
Here is Biden on Biden:
Posted by: bad | October 20, 2008 at 12:41 PM
Thwack!
Posted by: sbw whitman plumber jane | October 20, 2008 at 12:41 PM
Did everyone see Obama's comment that what McCain calls socialism, he calls "opportunity"? I think it gives McCain a great chance to explain why it won't work no matter what Obama wants to call it. And if McCain wraps it up by saying, "As Senator Obama rather ham-handedly remarked a few weeks ago, 'You can put lipstick on a pig: it's still a pig," more power to him.
Posted by: Elliott | October 20, 2008 at 12:49 PM
"Gird your loins", Biden says..
He shoulda said "Fill your hands.....". Ala the Duke!
Posted by: glasater | October 20, 2008 at 12:50 PM
we're gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community
Joe wants us to become community organizers for HObama.
Posted by: bad | October 20, 2008 at 12:51 PM
Lizza might drive the lefties nuts with this comparison:
Posted by: bad | October 20, 2008 at 01:01 PM
Does Joe Illuminati know something we don't know, like another building is going to horrifically blow up or another war is in the works? Does he want to spark visions of the Bush administration? I am totally freaked out.
Posted by: A.B. | October 20, 2008 at 01:10 PM
Imagine Biden promising he won't run. Now that's a laugh.
Posted by: Jane | October 20, 2008 at 01:10 PM
Biden always blabs the last thing he heard. This weekend wqe learned both candidates' teams were breifed on existing threats.
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 01:16 PM
*we learned*
"briefed*
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 01:18 PM
Good point, Clarice. Who do you think will be breaking the story Ace has been teasing or is it all bunk?
Posted by: Elliott | October 20, 2008 at 01:24 PM
I'm inclined to believe the neighbors had a close relationshipo and the report is thus not farfetched, but I have no idea about the credibility of the source or when or if he/she will go public with that story.
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 01:31 PM
Does Joe Illuminati know something we don't know, like another building is going to horrifically blow up
No, we've been told Bill Ayers isn't in contact with the campaign.
Posted by: bgates | October 20, 2008 at 01:32 PM
From reading Ace's remarks in the comments, it sounds like PJTV to me. The recent columns they've had on the DOJ have been been anonymously authored.
Posted by: Elliott | October 20, 2008 at 01:38 PM
Meanwhile, Gallup shows Obama gaining, the other tracking polls are all showing a closer race. CNN has it 51-46.
Posted by: ben | October 20, 2008 at 01:44 PM
Good guess.
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 01:44 PM
Poll results from 10/23/04:
Gallup: Bush 51, Kerry 46
Democracy Corps: Bush 47, Kerry 49
Zogby: Bush 45, Kerry 47
Survey USA: Bush 48, Kerry 50
ARG: Bush 47, Kerry 50
Rasmussen: Bush 50, Kerry 46
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 01:51 PM
Ben, remember that when a poll changes by 1 point with a margin of error of 3 points, that doesn't mean any more than a coin flip would.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 20, 2008 at 01:59 PM
Neo is clearly an idiot. You can't read this blog and not know about Ayers' connections to Obama. The only possible explanation is willful ignorance. SOP for liberals.
Posted by: Antimedia | October 20, 2008 at 02:14 PM
Our Neo is an idiot? Our Neo is a liberal? I think you misread him.
Posted by: Sue | October 20, 2008 at 02:21 PM
Antimedia, I think you're misreading that. It's Elena Shor saying Obama had no connection, and Neo calling her a liar.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 20, 2008 at 02:26 PM
My brain farts must be contagious...
Posted by: bad | October 20, 2008 at 02:34 PM
The New Yorker's Ryan Lizza on Joe Biden:
Supposed gaffes...hmmm
Posted by: bad | October 20, 2008 at 03:08 PM
Hmmmm!
October Surprise?
Posted by: Plumber's Pal | October 20, 2008 at 03:12 PM
API and a US Law firm - LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Shark orbiting has commenced.
Posted by: Elliott | October 20, 2008 at 03:45 PM
Above: The election is NOT IN THE BAG.
Posted by: bio mom | October 20, 2008 at 04:07 PM
Berg would be the same PUMA behind obamacrimes.com I take it?
Posted by: rhodeymark | October 20, 2008 at 04:08 PM
Berg is the lawyer suing to make Obama prove he's a natural born citizen.
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 04:18 PM
Berg is the lawyer who filed the Obama birth certificate federal law suit.
Posted by: Plumber's Pal | October 20, 2008 at 04:18 PM
Hmmm, I think Hi'll Buzz off to Tee Dahlin.
==========================
Posted by: kim | October 20, 2008 at 04:28 PM
They're suspicious of a hoax, and dismayed that it might be a distraction for Berg. I think they're worried about Obama producing a Hawaiian birth certificate from the vault, despite that he still has Indonesian citizenship, and traveled as an adult under it, like to Pakistan.
======================
Posted by: kim | October 20, 2008 at 04:36 PM
Who are you talking about, Kim? "They" isn't very specific you know.
McCain picks up the ball Biden kicked onto the field and runs to the touchdown zone with it..between Joe the Plumber and Joe the Dumeber he has two nice solid leads to the end.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/McCain_keys_off_Biden_remarks.html
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 04:43 PM
PUMAs at Texas Darlin'.
==============
Posted by: kim | October 20, 2008 at 04:48 PM
Once again, art impedes communication.
==========================
Posted by: kim | October 20, 2008 at 04:50 PM
Biden is trying to put lipstick on the Bay of Pigs.
Fabulous.
Posted by: MayBee | October 20, 2008 at 04:53 PM
So, another boring old Instalanche for Tom.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 20, 2008 at 05:21 PM
Yeah, that Biden is WAY more qualified than Palin, eh?
Posted by: drjohn | October 20, 2008 at 05:23 PM
I thought Europe was gonna love us again when O got in, just like they did when... uh, whenever that time was, when they loved us. Oh yeah. The moon landing. They loved us for a day or two then I think.
So Biden says the right decisions are UNpopular? Gee, how right is Bush, then?
Posted by: Mister Snitch | October 20, 2008 at 05:27 PM
I'm not sure if Biden is trying to run a psyops campaign on the US public, the rest of the Obama campaign staff, or himself.
Alleged future crisis?
"Presumptious" to ascertain his knowledge of foreign policy? An I'm sure that Colin Powell is just a phone call away, too. As is Warren Christopher and Madeline Albright.
Woo! I'm scaring myself now.
Posted by: E. Nigma | October 20, 2008 at 05:31 PM
So Biden says the right decisions are UNpopular? Gee, how right is Bush, then?
Word.
Between this and the recent Palin story, do you suppose the MSM may be feeling a little buyers' remorse?
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 20, 2008 at 05:32 PM
In about 24 hours Biden will be wrapped up by Obama more tightly than Hannibal Lector was.
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 05:43 PM
The mind boggles with possible prophecy fulfillment.
China invades Taiwan, Obama pronounces it a "heartbreaking reunification" while Biden quips, "Well, hell, they're all Chinese anyway"?
Posted by: Cover Me, Porkins | October 20, 2008 at 05:53 PM
Father against son, brother against brother, where have I learned of this before?
Powell Endorses McCain (Endorsement Ignored by MSM)
Posted by: Plumber's Pal | October 20, 2008 at 05:55 PM
How dare Biden hint that a switch from Shrub's "we can finance two-and-a-half wars AND cut taxes on the rich AND pay for Reagan's debtload" might not be popular with the country that bought this pap for eight years! Everybody knows that the American electorate is just YEARNING to be told the brutal truth about structural deficits.
Posted by: Michael J. "Orange Mike" Lowrey | October 20, 2008 at 05:56 PM
Biden is not talking about the Bay of Pigs but about the Cuban Missile Crisis which followed a weak performance by JFK the Vienna summit with Khrushchev. It was the closest we came to a nuclear war ever.
Posted by: Judith | October 20, 2008 at 05:59 PM
Biden is just being realistic. W was tested by the chinese soon after taking office (remember the spy plane deal). I think we can count on a one-two punch of Obama is elected as a number of nations decide to challenge his spine, probably taking advantage of the timing of other crisises.
I suspect McCain, with his known anger, won't have the same level of trouble from the world but of course Biden wouldn't say that at this point.
Posted by: rjschwarz | October 20, 2008 at 06:09 PM
I'm sure we're all agreed that telling the truth about structural deficits isn't popular. Which is undoubtedly why Obama is instead promising to fund universal health care with a tax cut.
Posted by: Paul Zrimsek | October 20, 2008 at 06:10 PM
Khruschev decided to test JFK, in the end it proved to be a draw. Khruschev blinked and in the end it cost him his chair.
That isn't to say we won; the 'cool' JFK and the highly-educated, self-confident collection of advisers that he passed on to JFK cost this country far more.
Posted by: mrkwong | October 20, 2008 at 06:15 PM
These comments by Biden are amazing on so many levels. Don't worry Joe, we'll treat BO just as fairly as you guys treated Bush.
Posted by: adlibn | October 20, 2008 at 06:18 PM
finance...AND cut taxes
That should be "by cutting taxes." The tax cuts greatly increased tax revenue.
Could we please stop saying that tax cuts will cause a decrease in tax revenue? Wait until we get to the sweet spot on the Laffer curve. There's no evidence that we're there yet.
Thanks!
Posted by: Jim Ryan | October 20, 2008 at 06:23 PM
In about 24 hours Biden will be wrapped up by Obama more tightly than Hannibal Lector was.
I've been saying "Biden bites" since his selection!
Posted by: rhodeymark | October 20, 2008 at 06:41 PM
You don't have to go back to JFK to recall an example of a serious challenge to a new President. It happened to Bush in April 2001, when the Chinese downed a US Navy plane while it was flying over international waters. This incident seems to have gone down the collective MSM memory hole. If Obama wins the upcoming election, the challenge could come much sooner if the Israelis decide they cannot wait to deal with the Iranian nuclear threat. What if they decide they need to take action before Bush leaves office?
Posted by: Baba Ganoush | October 20, 2008 at 06:41 PM
"Orange Mike"
What, laid off from the Odinga staff?
Posted by: rhodeymark | October 20, 2008 at 06:44 PM
In essence 9/11 was such an event. Remember Gore and Clinton held up the transition planning. By 9/11 many key positions were still unfilled or had just been filled.
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 06:53 PM
"Gird your loins"?
I've love to do that, but I'm so well-endowed "below-the-equator" that it's very difficult for me to find a big enough girding for my loins.
Hey, d'ya think Obama will include free loin-girders in his health plan?
Posted by: MarkJ | October 20, 2008 at 06:54 PM
I'm going off topic for a minute, but can someone clear up Obama's "tax cut" for the middle class for me? I swear he is offering a one time check for $1000 while allowing Bush's tax cuts to expire. There is no tax cut, at least as far as I can tell.
Posted by: Sue | October 20, 2008 at 06:56 PM
Last time we discussed girding loins here, Chemerinsky was girding his for the Plame suit. And we k ow that one bombed at the gate.
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 07:02 PM
So which of our enemies is the NoBama camp in talks with to spring that "challenge," and what were they promised for doing it?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut | October 20, 2008 at 07:14 PM
"I think we can count on a one-two punch of Obama is elected as a number of nations decide to challenge his spine, probably taking advantage of the timing of other crisises."
No, they will take advantage of the fact he is a naive, unprepared and inexperienced empty suit.
Posted by: ben | October 20, 2008 at 07:25 PM
To be fair, there are some countries out there who will test any new president, McCain or Obama and the next guy and the guy after him, too. Like China. They always create an international incident within the first year of any new administration, usually by means of making someone else's aircraft land involuntarily...
Posted by: Jeff R. | October 20, 2008 at 07:37 PM
To answer MarkJ's question, anticipate that under Obama's health plan the government will offer free girders to those who had sub-prime loins, but those who are rich in girth will be taxed to spread their width around. Be assured that most small businessmen should see a lower girth rate or even a girth rebate, allowing them to expand their loins as the credit squeeze lets up.
Posted by: Baba Ganoush | October 20, 2008 at 07:55 PM
You know the old joke about the Irishman who goes to England and applies for a job with a construction firm?
Hiring boss: "Right. Now tell me, if you can, the difference between a girder and a joist?"
Applicant (with puzzlement): "Well..now...could it be that a Goethe would write Faust and a Joyce would write Ulysses?"
Posted by: Amused bystander | October 20, 2008 at 08:05 PM
"So which of our enemies is the NoBama camp in talks with to spring that "challenge," and what were they promised for doing it?"
With hundreds of foreign policy advisers, all of whom appear to be putting out anti-Israel messages continuously, I doubt if there is any need to talk to any of our enemies. They clearly get the message; open season on Israel the day Obama takes office.
In addition:
"Obama advisor Michael Schiffer told reporters that Obama's first step after the election will be to pull troops from Iraq."
How much talking to our enemies would one have to do before they understood that they were free to destroy Iraq?
LUN
Posted by: Pagar | October 20, 2008 at 08:14 PM
A cynical take, (and one that requires Joe to be clever), is that Joe is giving a pre-warning for when, gosh darn, gee whiz, Obama won't be able to cut those taxes after all, in fact, he will need to raise them and we will all need to sacrifice together to repair the damage of the Bush years.
Posted by: bad | October 20, 2008 at 08:14 PM
@mrkwong: The standoff with the Soviets was hardly a draw. With his gambit of placing missiles in Cuba, Khrushchev wanted to force the US to withdraw its missiles from Turkey. That is precisely what he got as part of the agreement to end the Cuban Missile Crisis. JFK quietly ordered the missiles out of Turkey because he knew the Soviets had the US boxed into a corner. That's when JFK learned the lesson that Obama is stubbornly determined to ignore. For good reason, Putin surely must view Obama in the same way Khrushchev viewed JFK. I predict Obama will blink first.
Posted by: Baba Ganoush | October 20, 2008 at 08:17 PM
MarkJ: Do not forget that under Obama's nationalized health care plan, you will also get a free petard to hoist your loins on, under a single petard payer plan, which really distinguishes it from McCain's plan, under which you will be free to choose your own petard payer.
Posted by: Baba Ganoush | October 20, 2008 at 08:28 PM
Did Obiden just try to throw BO under his own bus?
Posted by: torabora | October 20, 2008 at 09:34 PM
VOTERS SHOULD BE MORE CONCERENED ABOUT OBAMA'S LIFE-EXPECTANCY THAN WITH MCCAIN'S
Posted by: Plumber's Pal | October 20, 2008 at 09:50 PM
besides, think who would get the job if Obama died.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 20, 2008 at 09:56 PM
Well his father was an alcoholic who died in an auto accident and his mother died of cervical cancer..neither of which seem to be problems he has to worry about.It's not as though his family has congenital heart diease .
Posted by: clarice plumber | October 20, 2008 at 10:00 PM
Why is McCain not hitting Obama harder on the tax cuts issue? It isn't a tax cut. It is a check for $500 if you work, $1000 if both spouses work, and then it squishes into the tax credits for college (I don't have college age children so scratch that for me), mortgage interest credit (paid my house off, so scratch that too). And on January 1, 2011, the tax rate increases for everyone when Bush's tax cuts expire. On Obama's website, he skips right past Bush and even Clinton and heads into Reagan territory. We will be paying 20% less than we paid under Reagan. Nary a mention of the high income tax rate that Reagan inherited from Carter and had to work to reduce. Any reason why McCain isn't hammering Obama on the tax increase for middle class wage earners when Bush's tax cut expires?
Posted by: Sue | October 20, 2008 at 10:21 PM