As I was laboriously putting together my FOBO (Friends of Barack Obama) list, I discovered that Verner had already done all the work. Check out Barack's World. The whole site is just outstanding, and should be in everybody's bookmarks.
Given the wild ride these last few weeks, tonight's debate could get very interesting. When McCain's "He lied" ad came out, I suddenly found myself thinking about the Chinese. Just before almost any high level face to face meeting, they'll take offense at some putatively bad behavior, or lodge an accusation or complaint against the other party in order to put them off balance, and consequently at a disadvantage, coming into the talks.
McCain could separate himself from Bush and make fun of Obama at the same time if he'd say,
"Look at those big ears. Do we really want another chimp in the White House?"
The wife of Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel plans to endorse Democrat Barack Obama.
Lilibet Hagel has scheduled a 10 a.m. news conference in Alexandria, Va., on Tuesday with Susan Eisenhower, the granddaughter of Republican President Eisenhower. Susan Eisenhower also is an Obama supporter. [...]
She said it will be her first endorsement of a Democrat and that perilous world conditions were a factor. "The fact is we're in two wars, two of the longest we've ever been in. We've run up a third of our nation's debt in just the past eight years. We're in the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression," she said.
The Hagels know John and Cindy McCain, and she said her endorsement was not meant to slam them.
"This isn't anti-McCain. This is pro-Obama. I'm just convinced he's the right person," she said.
From the This ain't Hell, but you can see it from Here Site.
More money missing:
"Some of you may not have heard, but the DC government discovered last year that a small gang of their bureaucrats have been stealing money from taxpayer coffers for decades to the tune of nearly $50 million. Harriet Walters and some of her friends and workmates in the DC Tax and Revenue office siphoned off phony tax rebate checks, most recently in $400k chunks. In fact, when DC decided to tighten security in their procedures, it was Harriet Walters, the ringleader who designed the system intended to stop her."
LUN
Hard to believe no one noticed 50 million missing.
..."The fact is we're in two wars, two of the longest we've ever been in. We've run up a third of our nation's debt in just the past eight years. We're in the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression," she said...
What better time to turn the country over to someone with about a hundred days experience as a U.S. Senator.
Pagar--the beauty of it was the the tonier shops in town like Nieman Marcus surely knew what was going on and said nothing. One middle level bank clerk said "whoa!" reported the odd transactions and the rest is history/
In 1996, my husband and I attended a small breakfast fundraiser for Chuck Hagel who was in the process of convincing donors to support him in his first run for the Senate. Although Hagel was originally from Nebraska, he had not lived there in some time and was relatively unknown to the party faithful.
However, Hagel inspired our confidence because the of the man who came to speak on his (Hagel's) behalf that morning. And who was that man you might ask? John McCain.
I'll be interested to see if Obama can respond to any criticism of his positions without using the word "distraction."
Am I tired of that word, and the Obama campaign's use of it:
"Bringing up Bill Ayers and the character issue is a distraction from the fact that the American people want to hear what we're going to do about the economy."
"Asserting that I'm going to raise taxes is a distraction from the fact that the American people want to know who's going to end the war responsibly in Iraq."
"Saying that I want to surrender in Iraq is a distraction from the fact that the American people want to know that their president is a man who can show judgement and character."
Don't know if you noticed, but the Woods Fund was started by Frank sr. and Nelle Woods of Lincoln, Nebraska (Woods Brothers Realty, Lincoln Telephone & Telegraph, Sahara Coal Company). I saw some members of the family tonight at an art show. Thought I'd ask when the fund split into two parts, Lincoln v Chicago. It happened sometime in the 90's. The fund was originally directed primarily towards the arts (the intent of the founders, see mission statement of Woods Fund of Chicago)......the explanation to me, tonight, was that they now provide "seed money" to activist groups, get them up and going, and hopefully interest other better-funded foundations to carry on with the $.
I'm not sure exactly when/where I made that connection, but I have it listed as Verner's site in my bookmarks. She was posting here in the Ayers & Keating thread a little while ago, so perhaps you could check with her directly.
Good grief everybody has aliases. Jane M Hanes - is that for real or your version of an alias? By the way, my real name is Jan - I decided early on to stick with centralcal because there were too many janes, joans, jeans, etc. to confuse things. grin.
Mrs. Hagel: Another example of Chuck's questionable judgment.
Gotta love the not meant as a slam to McCain. Should be wonderful dinner parties back in D.C.
It's kind of like the old Monty Python sketch: Your majesty is like a stream of bat's piss.. what I meant, your majesty, is that you shine out like a shaft of gold when all around is dark.
JMH, If there is any way to get someone added to the "Barack's World" list, there is some glaring omissions under the money section, IMO.
Penny Pritzker , 2008 campaign finance chairman for Barack Obama"
"Barack Obama was in Chicago at the time of the Superior Bank failure & has full knowledge of what went on and the cause of the collapse."
As far as I can see, the entire subprime disaster plan was laid out in the Superior Bank scandal and no one paid any attention.
If Obama wins, one can be sure, Penny Pritzker will be somehow involved in US money policy.
" The Pritzkers, one of the nation’s wealthiest families and heirs to the fortune created by the Hyatt hotels, agreed today to pay a record $460 million to the federal government to avoid being punished for the failure of Superior Bank F.S.B., the big savings and loan institution that regulators seized last summer.
Federal officials said the payment, which will be spread out over 15 years, is the largest settlement ever in the failure of a banking institution. The failure itself is one of the largest in the last decade, one that some estimate could cost the government up to $1 billion.
Unbelievable isn’t it? The failure of Superior Bank, based in Hinsdale, cost the F.D.I.C. about $700 million, making it one of the largest federally insured financial institutions to fail in a decade. Regulators said Superior had collapsed because of poor lending practices and sloppy bookkeeping."
That Penny Pritzker is a finance chair for the Obama campaign is a scandal, in its self. Link
The second name I believe should be on that list is George Soros.
"Soros, Obama, and the Millionaires Exception"
"Soros and his family gave Barack Obama $60,000. This does not include money that Soros was able to funnel to so-called 527 groups (Moveon.org, for example) that have also been politically active; nor does it include money that Soros was able to raise from tapping a network of friends, business associates, and employees.
After taking advantage of the special freedom to raise large amounts of money from influential individuals, and as the campaigns entered their closing rounds, news was leaked to media outlets that both Hull and Ryan had personal scandals associated with them. The release of this news devastated both of their campaigns, leading to an easy run to victory for Obama in the primary and then in the general election. The New York Times Magazine revealed earlier in the year that David Axelrod, Obama's chief political and media adviser, may well have been behind the leak of the story that doomed the Hull candidacy as the primary reached its home stretch."
Without the aid of Soros, and family/friends
there is a good chance IMO, that Obama would not have won in 2004. Meaning that tonight we could be having a debate between two Americans with a solid list of achievements qualifying them to be president. Instead, John McCain is debating a person that is being sued in court today to determine if he is even eligible to be a candidate. A person that has more gaps in his resume than millions of other Americans who are known to meet the qualifications needed to be President as laid out in the Constitution of the US.
Depends on how much you want to drink. If you chug on "distraction" you will be out cold by 9:15. If McCain brings up Ms Congeniality I personally will uh, uh, do something vile. I hope the words Democrat congress are repeated early and often,
Mr Hagel is nearly indistinguishable from Obama on the Surge, doomsaying from the beginning and in denial up through this year, whilst taking verbal potshots at those who got it right:
"I think this is another episode of 'Alice in Wonderland,'"
Sure won't be sorry to see him leave the Senate. Dunno Mrs. Hagel . . . but from that short exposure, looks like she's well-suited to her spouse. I'd also note Hagel's earlier promise not to endorse a Democrat, and wonder if his wife's endorsement is supposed to be a proxy, or give him cover for reneging.
Frankly, though, the idea of someone telling me how to vote just irritates me. If anything, it actually makes me less likely to support the endorsee. Getting his wife to do it for him doesn't add. And from his recent stellar judgment, not sure why Hagel's endorsement would be any more persuasive than Bruce Springsteen's (and that ain't exactly a high bar), even if I liked him.
If Verner doesn't check in on the debate thread tonight, you could try Discover the Networks' Contact Page.
I've been reading that 31 segment Obama Series over at NewZeal that you linked to earlier -- it's a pretty amazing compendium. I was working through them with an eye to nailing down Obama connections, and I was struck by how careful he seems to have been about explicitly allignments. He has fairly clear ties to a whole host of individuals, but has managed to skirt any obvious links to the organizations behind them.
re Penny Pritzker and Superior Bank. I've been mulling the idea that the goal from the start with the NiNJA stuff and sub-prime mess was to bring down capitalism and our markets.
After all, Obama has stated that he will fundamentally change America.
Remember Naomi Klein's "Shock Doctrine" which accuses the current administration of inducing shock and awe to re-arrange the economic playing pieces into embracing capitalism and free markets?
And the truism that the Left accuses the Right of what the Left is actually doing?
It seems it is actually Obama and the Left who are using the current financial markets crisis to re-arrange the pieces of our economy into socialism.
And I thought I wasn't a conspiracy nut. But I can't imagine someone as supposedely as smart as Obama had no idea of what the consequences would be when he trained the ACORN leaders, sent them off to bully banks, and defended them in court.
Laptop - check
Battery - check
Tivo Remote - check
Let the Games Begin.
Posted by: Fisher | October 07, 2008 at 07:13 PM
Fisher,
Around here we also check the liquor cabinet.
Posted by: Jane | October 07, 2008 at 07:18 PM
As I was laboriously putting together my FOBO (Friends of Barack Obama) list, I discovered that Verner had already done all the work. Check out Barack's World. The whole site is just outstanding, and should be in everybody's bookmarks.
Given the wild ride these last few weeks, tonight's debate could get very interesting. When McCain's "He lied" ad came out, I suddenly found myself thinking about the Chinese. Just before almost any high level face to face meeting, they'll take offense at some putatively bad behavior, or lodge an accusation or complaint against the other party in order to put them off balance, and consequently at a disadvantage, coming into the talks.
Posted by: JM Hanes | October 07, 2008 at 07:18 PM
McCain could separate himself from Bush and make fun of Obama at the same time if he'd say,
"Look at those big ears. Do we really want another chimp in the White House?"
Posted by: PaulL | October 07, 2008 at 07:23 PM
The wife of Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel plans to endorse Democrat Barack Obama.
Lilibet Hagel has scheduled a 10 a.m. news conference in Alexandria, Va., on Tuesday with Susan Eisenhower, the granddaughter of Republican President Eisenhower. Susan Eisenhower also is an Obama supporter. [...]
She said it will be her first endorsement of a Democrat and that perilous world conditions were a factor. "The fact is we're in two wars, two of the longest we've ever been in. We've run up a third of our nation's debt in just the past eight years. We're in the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression," she said.
The Hagels know John and Cindy McCain, and she said her endorsement was not meant to slam them.
"This isn't anti-McCain. This is pro-Obama. I'm just convinced he's the right person," she said.
link
Posted by: aardvark | October 07, 2008 at 07:27 PM
JMH--I'd like to blog that and give jennifer credit if it's her's but I don't see any author listed. Can you help me out?
Posted by: clarice | October 07, 2008 at 07:48 PM
From the This ain't Hell, but you can see it from Here Site.
More money missing:
"Some of you may not have heard, but the DC government discovered last year that a small gang of their bureaucrats have been stealing money from taxpayer coffers for decades to the tune of nearly $50 million. Harriet Walters and some of her friends and workmates in the DC Tax and Revenue office siphoned off phony tax rebate checks, most recently in $400k chunks. In fact, when DC decided to tighten security in their procedures, it was Harriet Walters, the ringleader who designed the system intended to stop her."
LUN
Hard to believe no one noticed 50 million missing.
Posted by: Pagar | October 07, 2008 at 07:49 PM
What brilliant reasoning:
..."The fact is we're in two wars, two of the longest we've ever been in. We've run up a third of our nation's debt in just the past eight years. We're in the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression," she said...
What better time to turn the country over to someone with about a hundred days experience as a U.S. Senator.
Posted by: Fisher | October 07, 2008 at 07:49 PM
laughing hysterically at Jane. The liquor cabinet - check.
I am still at work and jealous of your early cocktail hour.
Posted by: centralcal | October 07, 2008 at 07:50 PM
Once again I am counting on the crew at JOM to get me through the night...
Posted by: Cindy | October 07, 2008 at 07:53 PM
Pagar--the beauty of it was the the tonier shops in town like Nieman Marcus surely knew what was going on and said nothing. One middle level bank clerk said "whoa!" reported the odd transactions and the rest is history/
Posted by: clarice | October 07, 2008 at 07:57 PM
"round here we also check the liquor cabinet."
You stop to put the booze in a cabinet?
Posted by: PeterUK | October 07, 2008 at 07:58 PM
Re: Lilibut Hagel.
In 1996, my husband and I attended a small breakfast fundraiser for Chuck Hagel who was in the process of convincing donors to support him in his first run for the Senate. Although Hagel was originally from Nebraska, he had not lived there in some time and was relatively unknown to the party faithful.
However, Hagel inspired our confidence because the of the man who came to speak on his (Hagel's) behalf that morning. And who was that man you might ask? John McCain.
Words fail me.
Posted by: Lesley | October 07, 2008 at 07:58 PM
Just a thought......the stock market may also be suffering from the aspect of Obama becoming President....Heaven forbid.....
Posted by: jcox31mc | October 07, 2008 at 08:01 PM
Yes the woman is right,give the job to Barrack Hussein Obama the man who can't remember what he did with $160,000,000.
"Michelle ma'am,did I leave $160 million bucks in my pants pocket"?
"You sent them to the cleaners Barry".
Posted by: PeterUK | October 07, 2008 at 08:06 PM
Pfft...
Chuck Hagel's ideology is not conservatism. It's Chuck Hagelism. He goes to the highest bidder.
Posted by: Soylent Red | October 07, 2008 at 08:09 PM
I'll be interested to see if Obama can respond to any criticism of his positions without using the word "distraction."
Am I tired of that word, and the Obama campaign's use of it:
"Bringing up Bill Ayers and the character issue is a distraction from the fact that the American people want to hear what we're going to do about the economy."
"Asserting that I'm going to raise taxes is a distraction from the fact that the American people want to know who's going to end the war responsibly in Iraq."
"Saying that I want to surrender in Iraq is a distraction from the fact that the American people want to know that their president is a man who can show judgement and character."
...and the cycle repeats.
Posted by: PD | October 07, 2008 at 08:14 PM
Soylent
Don't know if you noticed, but the Woods Fund was started by Frank sr. and Nelle Woods of Lincoln, Nebraska (Woods Brothers Realty, Lincoln Telephone & Telegraph, Sahara Coal Company). I saw some members of the family tonight at an art show. Thought I'd ask when the fund split into two parts, Lincoln v Chicago. It happened sometime in the 90's. The fund was originally directed primarily towards the arts (the intent of the founders, see mission statement of Woods Fund of Chicago)......the explanation to me, tonight, was that they now provide "seed money" to activist groups, get them up and going, and hopefully interest other better-funded foundations to carry on with the $.
Posted by: Lesley | October 07, 2008 at 08:23 PM
Well, carp. I'm liquorless.
Posted by: hit and run | October 07, 2008 at 08:31 PM
And not a drop of Nyquil, either.
Posted by: hit and run | October 07, 2008 at 08:32 PM
Time to turn water into wine, hit!
Posted by: DrJ | October 07, 2008 at 08:36 PM
Clarice:
I'm not sure exactly when/where I made that connection, but I have it listed as Verner's site in my bookmarks. She was posting here in the Ayers & Keating thread a little while ago, so perhaps you could check with her directly.
Posted by: Jane M Hanes | October 07, 2008 at 08:36 PM
Good morningGood evening, JaneMH.Posted by: Elliott | October 07, 2008 at 08:38 PM
Evenin' E!!iott Have we established our drinking words yet?
Posted by: Jane M Hanes | October 07, 2008 at 08:40 PM
hit:
Not even any fermented fruit in the veggie bin?
Posted by: Jane M Hanes | October 07, 2008 at 08:42 PM
JMH:
"Distraction" should be one.
Posted by: Soylent Red | October 07, 2008 at 08:42 PM
Good grief everybody has aliases. Jane M Hanes - is that for real or your version of an alias? By the way, my real name is Jan - I decided early on to stick with centralcal because there were too many janes, joans, jeans, etc. to confuse things. grin.
Posted by: centralcal | October 07, 2008 at 08:42 PM
I'm with you cc. I can't keep up with all of the musical chairs, er, names.
Posted by: DrJ | October 07, 2008 at 08:44 PM
a recent poll found that a large majority would like to replace the entire Congress. Let's start with Hagel....
I have never seen a Republican stab another Republican in the back in the middle of a closely contested election, and surely that has to be a new low.
Posted by: matt | October 07, 2008 at 08:44 PM
Mrs. Hagel: Another example of Chuck's questionable judgment.
Gotta love the not meant as a slam to McCain. Should be wonderful dinner parties back in D.C.
It's kind of like the old Monty Python sketch: Your majesty is like a stream of bat's piss.. what I meant, your majesty, is that you shine out like a shaft of gold when all around is dark.
Posted by: Barry Dauphin | October 07, 2008 at 08:45 PM
centralcal:
Didn't you hear? We're all Janes now!
Posted by: Jane M Hanes | October 07, 2008 at 08:45 PM
Hagel gives me acid drip. He is worthless.
Posted by: centralcal | October 07, 2008 at 08:46 PM
It's the only Jane I can think of.
Posted by: Jane's Directory of Military Small Arms Ammunition: | October 07, 2008 at 08:47 PM
You know what would make tonight perfect? If DoT came my just to say Hi! Isn't he the only one that has been for McCain from the start?
I have to come up with a new name. Mine is way to boring.
Posted by: Ann | October 07, 2008 at 08:47 PM
Evening, everyone. Axelrod warns McCain
Bring it.
Posted by: SukieTawdry | October 07, 2008 at 08:48 PM
He's less than worthless. And I voted for him, to my eternal shame. Talk about acid drip.
Posted by: Soylent Red | October 07, 2008 at 08:48 PM
Would that be DrJDOMSAA?
Posted by: Jane M Hanes | October 07, 2008 at 08:48 PM
Same problem here. But, it'll be tea with a spoonful of honey...and a shot of Jack Daniels.
And, if McCain doesn't do better than last time, scratch the tea and honey.
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | October 07, 2008 at 08:49 PM
"Distraction" should be one.
I only have four beers left. Have a heart. I'll never get through the debate at this rate...
Posted by: Porchlight | October 07, 2008 at 08:49 PM
Let's try this on for size.
Posted by: Soylent Jane | October 07, 2008 at 08:49 PM
Hmm. Definitely not PLAIN Janes, I might add. Well ... I would only have to add a vowel to became a Jane.
Posted by: centralcal | October 07, 2008 at 08:49 PM
I'm not nervous tonight. I think McCain will do well and Obama will win. Just as he did after the last debate.
Posted by: Sue-Jane | October 07, 2008 at 08:50 PM
JMH, If there is any way to get someone added to the "Barack's World" list, there is some glaring omissions under the money section, IMO.
Penny Pritzker , 2008 campaign finance chairman for Barack Obama"
"Barack Obama was in Chicago at the time of the Superior Bank failure & has full knowledge of what went on and the cause of the collapse."
As far as I can see, the entire subprime disaster plan was laid out in the Superior Bank scandal and no one paid any attention.
If Obama wins, one can be sure, Penny Pritzker will be somehow involved in US money policy.
" The Pritzkers, one of the nation’s wealthiest families and heirs to the fortune created by the Hyatt hotels, agreed today to pay a record $460 million to the federal government to avoid being punished for the failure of Superior Bank F.S.B., the big savings and loan institution that regulators seized last summer.
Federal officials said the payment, which will be spread out over 15 years, is the largest settlement ever in the failure of a banking institution. The failure itself is one of the largest in the last decade, one that some estimate could cost the government up to $1 billion.
Unbelievable isn’t it? The failure of Superior Bank, based in Hinsdale, cost the F.D.I.C. about $700 million, making it one of the largest federally insured financial institutions to fail in a decade. Regulators said Superior had collapsed because of poor lending practices and sloppy bookkeeping."
That Penny Pritzker is a finance chair for the Obama campaign is a scandal, in its self.
Link
The second name I believe should be on that list is George Soros.
"Soros, Obama, and the Millionaires Exception"
"Soros and his family gave Barack Obama $60,000. This does not include money that Soros was able to funnel to so-called 527 groups (Moveon.org, for example) that have also been politically active; nor does it include money that Soros was able to raise from tapping a network of friends, business associates, and employees.
After taking advantage of the special freedom to raise large amounts of money from influential individuals, and as the campaigns entered their closing rounds, news was leaked to media outlets that both Hull and Ryan had personal scandals associated with them. The release of this news devastated both of their campaigns, leading to an easy run to victory for Obama in the primary and then in the general election. The New York Times Magazine revealed earlier in the year that David Axelrod, Obama's chief political and media adviser, may well have been behind the leak of the story that doomed the Hull candidacy as the primary reached its home stretch."
Without the aid of Soros, and family/friends
there is a good chance IMO, that Obama would not have won in 2004. Meaning that tonight we could be having a debate between two Americans with a solid list of achievements qualifying them to be president. Instead, John McCain is debating a person that is being sued in court today to determine if he is even eligible to be a candidate. A person that has more gaps in his resume than millions of other Americans who are known to meet the qualifications needed to be President as laid out in the Constitution of the US.
Link
Posted by: Pagar | October 07, 2008 at 08:50 PM
Axelrod warns McCain
OMG, look at that jacket in the pic. Tough guy!
Posted by: Porchlight | October 07, 2008 at 08:50 PM
JaneAnn:
"Isn't he the only one that has been for McCain from the start"
Well if anything could bring him roaring back, that's probably it!
Posted by: Jane M Hanes | October 07, 2008 at 08:50 PM
Sue-Jane - hush yo' mouth girl. Obama has already won! The press is just holding back until the debate is officially over, doncha know.
Posted by: centralcal | October 07, 2008 at 08:51 PM
Oh, and later on make sure you don't miss this. Freakin' hilarious. LUN
Posted by: SukieTawdry | October 07, 2008 at 08:52 PM
Porch:
He looks like Shaft.
Posted by: Soylent Jane | October 07, 2008 at 08:52 PM
quick someone - give a link so I can be centraljane.
Posted by: centralcal | October 07, 2008 at 08:53 PM
Have we established our drinking words yet?
I think "plan," "warn," "fight," and variations thereof should be nominated.
Just a brief aside, l think Obama's new ad (out of touch, out of ideas, etc.) is his best in a while. The music is well chosen.
Posted by: Elliott | October 07, 2008 at 08:54 PM
Would that be DrJDOMSAA?
No JD here! (That means I don't get it, if that is directed to me.)
Posted by: DrJ | October 07, 2008 at 08:54 PM
The more Janes the merrier
Posted by: Jane Whitman | October 07, 2008 at 08:55 PM
FREE DOT!!!
FREE DOT!!!
[He was a Rudy guy]
FREE DOT!!!
Posted by: hit and run | October 07, 2008 at 08:55 PM
Elliott:
Is it Gil Scott-Heron?
Posted by: Soylent Jane | October 07, 2008 at 08:55 PM
Depends on how much you want to drink. If you chug on "distraction" you will be out cold by 9:15. If McCain brings up Ms Congeniality I personally will uh, uh, do something vile. I hope the words Democrat congress are repeated early and often,
Posted by: Jane Whitman | October 07, 2008 at 08:57 PM
seriously - I don't remember where to go to create a log in name. help me please!
Posted by: centralcal | October 07, 2008 at 08:59 PM
McCain should also drop, "My friends."
Posted by: Barbara | October 07, 2008 at 09:00 PM
OMG--My eyes really are crossed from fatigue--I reread the thread and found I actually typed "her's".
Posted by: clarice | October 07, 2008 at 09:00 PM
Here Centralcal? Under "Name".
Posted by: Jane Whitman | October 07, 2008 at 09:00 PM
I absolutely detest Obama's voice. I wish he would get rid of that fake southern accent.
Posted by: Sue-Jane | October 07, 2008 at 09:00 PM
I don't know, but it sounds familiar. Link.
Posted by: Elliott | October 07, 2008 at 09:00 PM
He looks like Shaft.
Soylent,
I was thinking Lester Bangs.
Posted by: Porchlight | October 07, 2008 at 09:01 PM
Centralcal,
Just change your name in the post a comment line.
Posted by: JaneAnn | October 07, 2008 at 09:01 PM
So apparently Obama has developed some fab new ideas for a sinking economy some of which he may reveal tonite.
Posted by: Jane Whitman | October 07, 2008 at 09:01 PM
centraljane - Just change your name line when you post a comment.
Posted by: Soylent Jane | October 07, 2008 at 09:01 PM
Mr Hagel is nearly indistinguishable from Obama on the Surge, doomsaying from the beginning and in denial up through this year, whilst taking verbal potshots at those who got it right:
Sure won't be sorry to see him leave the Senate. Dunno Mrs. Hagel . . . but from that short exposure, looks like she's well-suited to her spouse. I'd also note Hagel's earlier promise not to endorse a Democrat, and wonder if his wife's endorsement is supposed to be a proxy, or give him cover for reneging.Frankly, though, the idea of someone telling me how to vote just irritates me. If anything, it actually makes me less likely to support the endorsee. Getting his wife to do it for him doesn't add. And from his recent stellar judgment, not sure why Hagel's endorsement would be any more persuasive than Bruce Springsteen's (and that ain't exactly a high bar), even if I liked him.
Guess I better go watch this thing. Cheers.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | October 07, 2008 at 09:02 PM
that's it? jeez
Posted by: centraljane | October 07, 2008 at 09:02 PM
Everyone get their people from the audience fact-checkers ready--and away we go!
Posted by: glenda waggoner | October 07, 2008 at 09:02 PM
Grazie, everyone for the help
and we're off!
Posted by: centraljane | October 07, 2008 at 09:03 PM
Perfecto porch.
Brokaw is a tool. Just getting that out of the way early...
Posted by: Soylent Jane | October 07, 2008 at 09:03 PM
I just hate his ties!
Posted by: SukieTawdry | October 07, 2008 at 09:03 PM
I wonder who will be the first to get out of their chair?
Posted by: Jane Whitman | October 07, 2008 at 09:03 PM
Pagar:
If Verner doesn't check in on the debate thread tonight, you could try Discover the Networks' Contact Page.
I've been reading that 31 segment Obama Series over at NewZeal that you linked to earlier -- it's a pretty amazing compendium. I was working through them with an eye to nailing down Obama connections, and I was struck by how careful he seems to have been about explicitly allignments. He has fairly clear ties to a whole host of individuals, but has managed to skirt any obvious links to the organizations behind them.
Posted by: Jane M Hanes | October 07, 2008 at 09:04 PM
Oh good, how will we bail out the retirees?
Posted by: Jane Whitman | October 07, 2008 at 09:04 PM
First question is about another bailout. Swell.
Posted by: SukieTawdry | October 07, 2008 at 09:04 PM
I'm counting uh's and ah's.
Posted by: hit and run | October 07, 2008 at 09:05 PM
The only thing I like about Brokaw is that he's from South Dakota.
Regulations, drink!
Posted by: Porchlight | October 07, 2008 at 09:05 PM
Browkaws voice sucks.
Posted by: bad | October 07, 2008 at 09:05 PM
re Penny Pritzker and Superior Bank. I've been mulling the idea that the goal from the start with the NiNJA stuff and sub-prime mess was to bring down capitalism and our markets.
After all, Obama has stated that he will fundamentally change America.
Remember Naomi Klein's "Shock Doctrine" which accuses the current administration of inducing shock and awe to re-arrange the economic playing pieces into embracing capitalism and free markets?
And the truism that the Left accuses the Right of what the Left is actually doing?
It seems it is actually Obama and the Left who are using the current financial markets crisis to re-arrange the pieces of our economy into socialism.
And I thought I wasn't a conspiracy nut. But I can't imagine someone as supposedely as smart as Obama had no idea of what the consequences would be when he trained the ACORN leaders, sent them off to bully banks, and defended them in court.
Posted by: Syl | October 07, 2008 at 09:05 PM
Sarah lookalike behind first questioner!
Posted by: Caro | October 07, 2008 at 09:05 PM
Doesn't Bambi know another tune?
Posted by: SukieTawdry | October 07, 2008 at 09:05 PM
Aren't Obama's cheeks a little too red? a la Al Gore? yes......
Posted by: glenda-jane | October 07, 2008 at 09:05 PM
Will his ear piece fall out on tv?
Posted by: centraljane | October 07, 2008 at 09:05 PM
New debate thread! Everyone move one chair to the right...
Posted by: Porchlight | October 07, 2008 at 09:06 PM
Tax cuts for the middle class. Gov't projects.
Posted by: SukieTawdry | October 07, 2008 at 09:06 PM
So Obama's answer as with everything is to spend money.
Posted by: Jane Whitman | October 07, 2008 at 09:06 PM
The audience looks petrified.
Posted by: badjane | October 07, 2008 at 09:07 PM
I'm not crazy about the government to buy up homes.
Posted by: Jane Whitman | October 07, 2008 at 09:08 PM
So they should be, badjane.
Posted by: Porchjane | October 07, 2008 at 09:08 PM
Jesus, John, that was terrible, my friends.
Posted by: SukieTawdry | October 07, 2008 at 09:09 PM
And I clearly can't talk.
Posted by: Jane Whitman | October 07, 2008 at 09:09 PM
I think he'll warm up, Sukie.
New thread!
Posted by: Porchjane | October 07, 2008 at 09:10 PM
Walter, looks like you hit the nail on the head.
Posted by: Elliott | October 07, 2008 at 09:10 PM
WE NEED SOCIALISM! WE NEED SOCIALISM!
Posted by: Jane Whitman | October 07, 2008 at 09:10 PM
Hey Guys, Wish I could take credit for the discover the network page, but I had nothing to do with it.
Give them an email. and see if they might like including the new info.
Posted by: Verner | October 07, 2008 at 09:17 PM