Hillary as Secretary of State? Hillary has or has not been offered the job and will or will not accept (the Guardian is more definitive but are they credible?).
As always with the Clintons the first question is, does this advance their political interests? Hard to see how - Peter Beinart argues that Hillary that at State Hillary will rank third in influence behind Vice President and Fo-Po Guru Joe Biden (We'll score that a 'hmm') and a National Security Adviser to be named later (likely). And what does she do for an encore? Eventually her time at State will end, after which she will do what - hit the lecture circuit with Bill and attempt to amass a fortune of comparable worth? Why is that better than Senator for Life from New York?
Curious. But this at least makes more sense than the idea of nominating her for the Supreme Court. That wold provoke a confirmation scuffle which would have folks waxing nostalgic for the collegiality of the Bork and Thomas days, as dead-end righties (myself included) would demand a page by page review of the Ray report, which found "inconclusive" evidence of wrongdoing by the First Couple. Hard to believe that Obama thinks that re-fighting that craziness from the nineties will advance hope, change, and a post-partisan agenda.
Well. Since State is not a lifetime appointment and is more of a political than legal job I would be shocked if her confirmation hearing for that would swirl around Whitewater.
My guess is that Hillary(!) will play the role of "John the Baptist" to the Middle East.
She'll go forth and let the people in the Middle East know that One is following her whose sandals she is not fit to tie.
Obama will then show up.
Whereupon, doves descend, lions lie down with lambs, swords morph into ploughshares, priests of Ba'al are immolated, swarms of locusts, plagues of toads ...
it's all good.
.
Posted by: BumperStickerist | November 18, 2008 at 11:38 AM
Sweetness & Light believes at one of those questions in the 63 pp Obama-aire was designed for Clinton..in fact he shows that the NYT pdf version has the name Clinton penciled in by someone in the margin.Curiosuly, the NYT today runs an article questioning for the first time I believe Clinton's money raking in operation in the ME.
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 11:45 AM
Her confirmation for either the Supreme Court or for State would sail through the Senate. Who or what would stop her.
Senatorial courtesy is huge, they watch out for each other. Orin Hatch would have been confirmed easily if Bush had nominated him. Leiberman, Kerry or Lugar for State likewise.
These people vote and speak on all sides of everything. And they allow each other to do so. Just remember Kerry voting for before voting against. 100% of them do that 90% of the time. Never look to the Senate or House to find principles.
Posted by: Will Wills | November 18, 2008 at 11:58 AM
O.K. This is proof that we're not teaching Economics or science in school anymore.
From Zogby.com
What will it take for economic reality to kick these people in the head?
Posted by: Pofarmer | November 18, 2008 at 12:09 PM
This guy is shameless .. still.
Posted by: Neo | November 18, 2008 at 12:14 PM
What will it take for economic reality to kick these people in the head?
That's a rhetorical question, right?
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | November 18, 2008 at 12:21 PM
Pofarmer-
What will it take for economic reality to kick these people in the head?
Unemployment and rolling blackouts-but those could probably be blamed on the evil coal companies. It is good to see that Team Obama is picking up Clinton's old trick of polling minuta, ginning the results up to show overwhelming support, and then propose micro-initives to fatten supporters. Dick Morris and Mark Penn must be quietly sharing the moment.
Posted by: RichatUF | November 18, 2008 at 12:38 PM
Neo,
I wish our President-Elect came with a similar certificate of authenticity.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 18, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Does anyone else think the Hillary for State thing is just a charade? I can't believe Obama wants Hillary anywhere near his administration, let alone in such a high-profile post. And Hillary probably has long known this -- wouldn't be suprised if Obama's people already told the Clintons as much some time ago. So they agree to this face-saving scenario for Hillary, where he "offers" her the post subject to all the conflict clearances knowing that there is zero chance Bill and Hill can pass that test, and Hillary will eventually make a statement about how she wants to continue to represent the great people of New York in the Senate and Bill should keep doing his important work. Obama will have placated the Hillary supporters and Hillary can pretend she was paid the respect to which she is entitled.
But it's all a charade.
Posted by: Skeptic | November 18, 2008 at 01:31 PM
I'm with Skeptic. The SoS job is for the Puma dead enders. Hillary gets 'un-dissed' (and money to repay campaign loans) and the Pumas join the O-fold.
No matter how bad it gets the Republicans cannot must enough firepower to weaken Obama. Republicans can be ignored. As always. But Republicans plus Pumas can't be ignored.
Posted by: Bel Air | November 18, 2008 at 01:44 PM
must = muster
Posted by: Bel Air | November 18, 2008 at 01:45 PM
Might I suggest that for all these potential Cabinet Members they all join the next class in POW Training at Warner Springs. I see the President elect is making sure that it is reported that he is now reading books on FDR's administration, as well as one on Lincoln, (probably Doris Kearnes Goodwin's Team of Rivals). I would suggest a week in the woods shivering with the troops they'll be commanding, ala waterboards etc, might be of similar value.
Posted by: Daddy | November 18, 2008 at 01:52 PM
Obama will then show up.
Whereupon, doves descend, lions lie down with lambs, swords morph into ploughshares, priests of Ba'al are immolated, swarms of locusts, plagues of toads ...
it's all good.
Well in the real story Obama would end up nailed to a chunk of wood and lacking the ability to raise himself from the dead I suspect he will suffer the same modern day fate of every idiot politician who tries to impose a solution on Israel; a nice shiny Arab khanjar in the back.
Posted by: Barney Frank | November 18, 2008 at 02:05 PM
I do not think it's a charade. It would cost him unbelievable amounts of capital to allow this meeting and speculation and then not offer her the position. There's a possibility the Clintons might decide that bottling up Bill is too expensive a price, but it must appear the choice was their's to make.
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 02:06 PM
Being Obama's nominal first choice for SOS does a lot more for Hillary than actually accepting the spot. Contra Beinart, influence is not a function of rank, but of the President's pleasure and whatever access and/or independence he allows. Obama is all about control -- controlling the message, the image, the access, the money -- and that's what this is about. Cabinet appointees won't be carving out territories in his administration, least of all arch rival Hillary. She'll toe the line or get the boot, and he's certainly not about to let her claim credit for any foreign policy successes at the expense of his own political capital.
If Hillary turns him down (and she'd be crazy not to), he'll get points for asking. If she accepts, she cedes leadership of the Senate (advantage Obama), and once her seat is filled, Obama can fire her at will -- effectively removing her from the political power structure almost entirely. If she actually survives his first term in office, she'll be in no position to run against him again either. From an Obama perspective this is all good.
If Obama's administration goes down in flames, Hillary won't be in a position to run against anybody else either, so I'm not seeing any percentage for Hillary in sacrificing her own power base to accept. There could be something, or some backroom deal, that I'm not seeing, but unless the Clintons are contemplating a little international highlife before permanent retirement, I see her playing this for the coverage and then saying no.
Posted by: JM Hanes | November 18, 2008 at 02:12 PM
Perhaps Zero plans to send SecOStateHill to Somalia to scare the pirates. See LUN.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | November 18, 2008 at 02:28 PM
Does Hillary have anything on Obama which does away with his ability to fire her at will?
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 02:32 PM
A slightly OT anecdote...
I forwarded the Ziegler/Zogby vid on Obama supporters and the media to a liberal friend of mine. Late twenties, Jewish, urbanite in the DC area.
The viciousness of the response surprised even me. Ironically, he tacitly suggested that I was not a critical thinker.
Looks like I'll be shedding a few people from my Christmas card list over the next four years. I take some comfort in knowing that he probably was never really my friend anyway, and only tolerated my bitter, clinging ways by virtue of his superior breeding, intellect, and commitment to political inclusiveness.
Posted by: Soylent Red | November 18, 2008 at 02:34 PM
Someone on another site mentioned that the LATimes released the cases that Obama worked on when he was a lawyer but I tried searching for it today and couldn't find it.
Has anyone seen this or know where I can find it?
These are the possible reasons I think he offered Clinton the job:
1) During the primaries she compiled a list of damaging information about him - she found out something but decided not to use it during the primaries, maybe because although it was damaging, it wouldn't have helped her. They know she has this information and will give her the job to insure she doesn't use it. I have been thinking about the bc and the reasons he won't let anyone see it. I don't believe Obama isn't a citizen because the DNC wouldn't waste millions on a candidate who was ineligible. Maybe the bc has other information he doesn't want people to see but wouldn't make him ineligible but could damage his reputation. Maybe his father isn't who he says - that could ruin his career because it would mean he wrote a memoir based on lies. If Clinton found this out she could use it against him.
2) They want Clinton to be nominated so that Bill has to reveal of his financial information which could be damaging to her career - this would assure that she never tries to be President again.
Posted by: thinkingagain | November 18, 2008 at 02:36 PM
Guess he lacks a sense of humor Soylent. No loss...
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 02:37 PM
Yes, Soyleny. If there's one thing libs hate it is being aware of how only the very highly educated and the very ignorant bought O's song and dance.
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 02:55 PM
Does Hillary have anything on Obama which does away with his ability to fire her at will?
Is it conceivable that she wouldn't have found some way to share it with McCain if she had? I could see him deciding not to use it, though. He's an excellent loser, after all.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 18, 2008 at 02:56 PM
Soylent,
I considered forwarding that to a liberal friend with whom I've disagreed in the recent past. But we've been friends since infancy and best friends since college. So I decided that for the sake of my oldest closest friendship, I have to shut up, even though she sent me some BS commentary on the economy last week.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 18, 2008 at 02:57 PM
**SoylenT** (DRAT)
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 03:18 PM
Someone on another site mentioned that the LATimes released the cases that Obama worked on when he was a lawyer but I tried searching for it today and couldn't find it.
Has anyone seen this or know where I can find it?
LA Times Only Just Notices Obama Has Thin Resume?
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 18, 2008 at 03:40 PM
this election has ended a number of friendships, it seems. Had the same thing happen when I discussed McCain with a very old and close friend. She called me a racist. That pretty much ended that.
Posted by: matt | November 18, 2008 at 04:04 PM
3,700 billable hours in 4 years for Obama at his law firm? I'm surprised he wasn't asked to leave or denied a partnership. They want you billing at least 35 -40 hours/week, even if you didn't work them.
Posted by: matt | November 18, 2008 at 04:08 PM
?So I decided that for the sake of my oldest closest friendship, I have to shut up,
Never seen the political divide like this in the U.S. before. There are certain people you don't discuss politics with. Either that, or make new friends.
Posted by: Pofarmer | November 18, 2008 at 04:12 PM
from Sara's link:
GASP!! He defended a corporation who failed to provide heat for low-income folks.
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 04:12 PM
The viciousness of the response surprised even me.
Isn't it interesting how much less than magnanimous they are in victory? Kinda makes one wonder how they'll use all the new power.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 18, 2008 at 04:14 PM
Oh, jeez. Here we go. Eric Holder will be Obama's Attorney General. Hopenchange, meet Bus.
Posted by: JM Hanes | November 18, 2008 at 04:14 PM
And this one sounds really earth-shaking:
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 18, 2008 at 04:18 PM
Oh good, we get to talk about Marc Rich and his ex-wife again, just in time for the Hillary hearings.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 18, 2008 at 04:18 PM
Presidential Assasin’s Lawyer to be White House Counsel?
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 18, 2008 at 04:19 PM
Well, now that pisses me off. I wrote an over 2400 word piece for PJM on justice including bits on the front funners for AG. It was supposed to go in Monday or this morning and was held up to run something else. Now it's probably useless to them and I won't even get the pittance they pay. F*&)(!!
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 04:20 PM
**front Runners*** (I am really over tired and over worked and it shows I'm afraid.)
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 04:21 PM
I thought it read better the first time, Clarice.
(I hardly ever notice your typos until your correction posts, then I go back and think 'Wow, I guess I just got what she was saying. Wonder why she corrected it.')
Fresh-baked focaccia and a nice Italian red, out on the veranda (or as they spell it on next year's NR cruise website, 'verandah'). Better than vitamins for what ails ya.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 18, 2008 at 04:32 PM
There are certain people you don't discuss politics with. Either that, or make new friends.
Yeah, pretty much. Luckily it is only really bad during Presidential election years. But one must step lightly.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 18, 2008 at 04:35 PM
From JMH's link:
Let's see if he will remain sharply critical of secrecy and expansive executive power in the Obama administration. Don't hold your breath.
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 04:36 PM
Well...DU is going Chiquita bananas over Holder!
Clarice: Sorry to hear about the PJM piece.
Posted by: centralcal | November 18, 2008 at 04:38 PM
Holder has also been critical of all the WOT moves of the Administration. Look for a captured jihadi thug to be out on bail in the neighborhood.
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 04:45 PM
Since Hilly won't take State cause of her husband, who was President before she was Congress, can't we trade Beau for like AG since he won't take Joe's old Congress seat or maybe State since his dad gives away 100 of billions a year in foreign aid? Dad was good for money, so why not put the son at State where he'll be appreciated for all that free money? We could use Hilly as an AG too since it' doesn't involve foreign bribes like Obama's Biden(dad, not son) or Hilly's husband.
Posted by: Gone........................... | November 18, 2008 at 04:48 PM
We could use Hilly as an AG
Wouldn't she have to be able to pass the DC bar to be AG? Something she failed to do, if I recall correctly.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 18, 2008 at 05:45 PM
She passed the Ark one so she'd be fine.
Some days I really love Larry Eagleburger:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2008/11/18/larry-eagleburger-unloads-obama-hitchens-richardson>Tellin it like it is
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 06:13 PM
Thanks for that link Clarice. Eagleburger was delightful.
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 06:17 PM
There's a possibility the Clintons might decide that bottling up Bill is too expensive a price
Do they have to do that or do they just have to promise to do that?
Furthermore, why are we worried about the spouse of a cabinet secretary? Has "I think people's families are off limits" already expired?
Posted by: Elliott | November 18, 2008 at 06:23 PM
Really, what could make Obama rest easier than Hillary in state?
Posted by: Elliott | November 18, 2008 at 06:28 PM
Hillary lying in state?
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 06:29 PM
Hillary lying
Doesn't that go without saying? It is the Clintons we're talking about.
Posted by: Elliott | November 18, 2008 at 06:38 PM
"Now it's probably useless to them and I won't even get the pittance they pay."
Didn't read up on Hollywood-Ferengi accounting rules I take it? The cycling screenwriter repenthouse editor's guild started off screwing people from day -1 so your experience can't really go in the "What a surprise?" bin. "Cash in advance" (to mean "the check has cleared") would seem a wise future path.
bad,
That was a real keeper.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | November 18, 2008 at 06:39 PM
Thanks Rick
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 06:47 PM
You've a point, Rick. The editor is trying to salvage it, but really you can't asl for a timely piece and then bump it for one that has no time deadline and not have such things happen.
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 06:47 PM
Drudge has this holiday gift idea linked. LUN
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 06:49 PM
bad, that is so good it will surely be stolen many times. Elliott, the 63 pp questonnaire asks many details about the spouse and family of the person under consideration.
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 06:53 PM
Thanks Clarice
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 07:04 PM
This is looking more and more like a rerunning of the Clintoon administration, except with worse economic policies.
Posted by: Pofarmer | November 18, 2008 at 07:59 PM
Well, it will also be worse because Clinton had a Rep Congress to hold him in some kind of check.
We have to hope that one thing or another slows him down long enough so that in two years there'll be a slightly different congress.
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 08:21 PM
Looking at Craig and Holder, it's rather striking. You've got a guy going to be the legal counsel to the POTUS who has taken about every high profile Anti-American case possible. In Eric Holder you've gut a guy who many people would say actively subverted justice lobbying for the Pardon of Marc Rich going in as the head of the Justice department. Is this some upside down world?
Posted by: Pofarmer | November 18, 2008 at 09:09 PM
Po, it is brilliant and well rounded and outside of the box for a dem President. For a Republican President it would be criminal. Go figure.
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 09:18 PM
What's in it for Obama and Hillary?
For Obama: this isn't the ideal time for a rookie president. Russia looking past Georgia into Europe. China looking to erase Taiwan off the map. NoKo thumbing their nuclear noses. Chavez & Putin anxious to shake things up to raise that oil barrel price. Iran waiting to see how a US-less Iraq will play out. Any one of these powder kegs going off will be disastrous. Make it all Hillary's responsibility. Plus, Hillary in the Senate can be his most effective roadblock - I believe the Clintons still have enormous pull within the party.
For Clinton: the ability to upstage the rookie. She'll be the one in all the pictures with world leaders. Not at all shy in taking credit and upstaging whoever is in her way. Natural choice in 2012 as people wake up out of their Obamacomas and realize that Obama's policies apply even to those who voted for him.
Posted by: George S | November 18, 2008 at 09:36 PM
Ted Steven's Election Update:
As of above about 30 minutes ago local Anchorage News is reporting that Republican Senator Ted Steven's has been defeated by Dem Challenger Mark Begich. Begich, the Tax loving Mayor of Anchorage, now leads convicted felon Steven's by 3,724 votes. That margin of victory is supposedly greater than the percentage requiring a mandatory recount, so if a recount is called for, Steven's would have to pay for it. Some 2,500 Absentee Ballots from overseas still remain to be counted, but as they cannot effect the overall outcome, the local Media is proclaiming Begich the winner. Begich himself, refuses yet to comment, and Steven's has made no public statements either. Begich will be the only one of 100 US Senators to possess only a High School Education, but that fact has been so widely trumpeted by the MSM that I apologize for mentioning it.
Posted by: Daddy | November 18, 2008 at 09:36 PM
Heh, daddy--no apologies necessary. URGH--I think I'll just get drunk for 4 years. We just threw out the old emergency supplies (water/spam/duct tape/etc we stocked up on after 9/11)..because we think it's time to put in fresh supplies.
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 09:48 PM
Clarice:
I think I'll just get drunk for 4 years.
It's worked for me for the last 2.
Posted by: hit and run | November 18, 2008 at 09:53 PM
Yeah, hit but you are better at hiding it than I would be.
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 10:05 PM
Clarice,
You threw out spam? Don't you know that's nonbiodegradable? The "Use by" date code is in millennia. I can sorta understand duct tape but never spam. Not after eating WWII C-rations (or was it K?) in 1969.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | November 18, 2008 at 10:06 PM
I read that spam purchases are on the rise amidst speculation that folks are stockpiling provisions.
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 10:12 PM
Ya know, I've kinda been thinking that Obama was reconstituting the Clintoon administration. However, it's beginning to look like he's reconstituting it without the few competent parts. I think that his lack of time in Washington is really showing, hell, politics in general. If he had been a Governor(hint) he would have known people, or at least known of people. But, being a short time Illinios Senator, and spending basically his whole time in the U.S. Senate running for President, he doesn't have any connections. These are Rahm Emmanuels picks.
Posted by: Pofarmer | November 18, 2008 at 10:20 PM
Guns and ammo are moving briskly too, bad.
Posted by: Pofarmer | November 18, 2008 at 10:23 PM
Oh Yeah
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 10:25 PM
So Steven King's werewolvish youngerbrother,
gets the slot in Alaska; thanks a lot Ron Paul; he supported Stevens in the primary.
Seemingly Sarah with a few exceptions, seems to be the only decent pols up there.
The state wide pickings aren't too hot down
here, Crist, I've made my dissapointment clear about; Martinez, who ordinarily would
be symbol of pride, dissapointed many on his position on Gitmo, the Surge, the supposed neglect of Latin America. Gordon Smith with an accent. Next time,get someone from Miami; not Orlando. Closer to home, Rush Limbaugh bete noire Stacy Ritter has
become the county mayor down here; because the world is mad, haven't I made that clear yet. Oh it looks like the Palin pool side picks were fakes; at least according to some who've examined the original Bauer-Griffin photos. All though Sundries hasn't
validated that conclusion yet.
Posted by: narciso | November 18, 2008 at 10:35 PM
Read this bit by Jake Tapper.
They want to approve Bill's future speeches! It sounds to me like Obama asked Hillary to be SoS so he could control Bill.
Don't you think?
Posted by: MayBee | November 18, 2008 at 10:45 PM
Rick, I still have the spam..decided to keep it for emergencies and just replace it with some newer canned food.
I may just ignore all politics for 4 years and cook and exercise and knit. It's got to be less maddening.
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 10:49 PM
Bill vs Bam. Let the games begin!! More suppression of free speech here.
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 10:55 PM
I fully expect that anyone in O's position would insist on reviewing Bill's speeches on foreign affairs or made overseas. Really. Not just because he's the husband of the Sec of State but esp because he is also an ex-president and his words might well be considered more official.The Clintons will have to decide--and since so much of their wealth seems derived from Bill's overseas stuff, and it seems so important to him to have so much money, this will be fun to watch.
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 11:02 PM
Ha Ha Clarice, I just got the real thrust of O's comments about "only one president at a time."
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 11:07 PM
"These are Rahm Emmanuels picks."
I think that would explain a lot, Pofarmer. On the bright side, at least Obama is not trying to recreate the Carter administration by starting with Bzerzinski (whose spelling I can't be bothered to look up). Of course, there's no telling who's actually up next if Hillary declines.
Posted by: JM Hanes | November 18, 2008 at 11:08 PM
It looks like General James Jones; who's not keen on the Jews; but not at the McPeak/Zinni level, is going to be the Scowcroft of this administration. And Brennan, the guy who knew no Arabic yet was appointed COS in Riyadh because he was a good briefer for Tenet, whose contracting firm was caught rifling theough pass port
records is the man in the Company. Let the Mayhem begin; as Elliot Carver would say.
Posted by: narciso | November 18, 2008 at 11:17 PM
Clarice, bad...
You know, assuming a cultivated level of detachment, watching the new administration unfold, if not unravel, could turn out to be a barrel of fun. Contemplating the struggle to control an aging Bill is downright entertaining, no? Clashing egos on a titanic scale. Narcissists R Us!
Posted by: JM Hanes | November 18, 2008 at 11:21 PM
I may just ignore all politics for 4 years and cook and exercise and knit.
If you do that, I hope you'll find time to watch The Sandbaggers, the best espionage drama* (and perhaps the best television show) of all time.
__________________________
*This is a rare point of agreement between me and the The New York Times.
Posted by: Elliott | November 18, 2008 at 11:25 PM
I don't recall President Bush trying to muzzle former President Clinton. Or did I miss something?
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 11:25 PM
I fully expect that anyone in O's position would insist on reviewing Bill's speeches on foreign affairs or made overseas. Really.
Jake Tapper says Bush put no such demands on Bush 41, but then 41 is his father and one would assume more loyal.
I agree that Obama would want to vet Bill's speeches, and keep him from criticizing Obama internationally. He can't even ask to do that if Hillary isn't part of the administration. And because most of Bill's work is international, choosing her for SoS gives them an excuse to vet his international speeches.
oooh. Obama's a playah.
Posted by: MayBee | November 18, 2008 at 11:26 PM
I don't recall President Bush trying to muzzle former President Clinton. Or did I miss something?
No, he didn't. Even when he named him a special envoy. Bush certainly didn't muzzle Hillary when Bill was Bush's Tsunami Relief and Katrina Relief point man.
Posted by: MayBee | November 18, 2008 at 11:28 PM
as Elliot Carver would say.
During the campaign season that was on TV. I was in stitches when he said, "This is our moment."
Posted by: Elliott | November 18, 2008 at 11:29 PM
Obama's a playah.
post racial, post political..or just a post.
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 11:30 PM
hee hee, Obama's a Hitchen's post.
Posted by: bad | November 18, 2008 at 11:31 PM
Yes, it could,jmh. Perhaps we could experiment with various alcoholic libations at the same time and share recipes?
I mean as long as alcohol is still available for sale and we still have funds to buy it.
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 11:32 PM
or just a post
Apostate is, I believe, the claim most commonly made.
Posted by: Elliott | November 18, 2008 at 11:33 PM
Elliott, Herb Meyers recommended the Sandbaggers to be k
long ago (I had forgotten seeing it it was so many years ago). I ran thru a number of them on Netflix. Yes, I suppose that's rather accurate..depressing though.
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 11:35 PM
team of rivals = means to muzzle
Posted by: MayBee | November 18, 2008 at 11:35 PM
****to Me A
long ago
Posted by: clarice | November 18, 2008 at 11:38 PM
My mom had watched it when PBS stations first ran it (early 90s?) and bought it when it came out on DVD. I was hooked after the first episode.
Posted by: Elliott | November 18, 2008 at 11:43 PM
JMH - that would be true if the Holiday from History started up again. I'm worried we're getting the cast of "Yes Minister" written in to "24".
Posted by: bgates | November 18, 2008 at 11:44 PM
So Bill gets his speeches vetted by the refiner's fire and cleansed of all impurities.
Yeah, that'll keep him from making inopportune remarks.
Posted by: hit and run | November 18, 2008 at 11:54 PM
Are you sure it's not the other way round, bgates?
Posted by: Elliott | November 18, 2008 at 11:55 PM
This is how easy it is to become president:
http://www.buttafly.com/content/obama-quote-1.php
Posted by: Flannigan | November 19, 2008 at 12:01 AM
It's not what comes out of Bill's mouth that gets him in trouble. It's what comes out of his fly.
I realize he's Teleprompter Jesus and all, but how will the Messiah vet that?
Sandbaggers rocks BTW. How much is the complete set?
Posted by: Soylent Red | November 19, 2008 at 01:10 AM
I think it was $160 on Amazon.
Posted by: Elliott | November 19, 2008 at 01:41 AM
Wellingham is such a great character.
Posted by: Elliott | November 19, 2008 at 01:46 AM
You know, it occurs to me that Obama couldn't care less about whether or not Hillary accepts the SOS post and that the whole point of this vetting exercise is to get ahold of Bill's donor list -- that the questionnaire was designed with only one person in mind, and that administering it across the board is just a subterfuge to obscure its real purpose. Obama is all about controlling the money. Everything else flows from that. And there's really only one conceivable way to pry the Clinton's list loose, isn't there?
Posted by: JM Hanes | November 19, 2008 at 01:53 AM
That is a very compelling analysis, Quassandra. Do you think the Clintons will fill out the form before they reach an agreement though?
Posted by: Elliott | November 19, 2008 at 01:56 AM