Bruce McQuain of Q and O mocks Josh Marshall's partisan pleading for the stimulus package so we hardly need to. But this from Dr. Marshall was too good to overlook:
See, as examples, the Patriot Act, the 2002 Iraq War Resolution, or the international consensus that Saddam had WMDs. Or have libs forgotten all that?
And let me add, what consensus on the stimulus is he talking about?
ADDENDUM: Kevin Drum tackled the WMD consensus, and here is Tim Russert in 2005 linking WMDs to the power of fear and a compliant media:
Mr. Russert: When you say the deference of the public and the deference of the media--post- September 11th, there was a fear of terrorism, an inability to know whether there were weapons of mass destruction by the public or by the media. George W. Bush said there were. Bill and Hillary Clinton said there were. The Russians, French and Germans, who opposed the war, said there were. Hans Blix of the U.N. said there were.
Matt Drudge's current headline is "The Fear - Pass It Now Or We May Never Recover". Looks like "Hope And change" has morphed into "Fear And More Of The Same" in just two weeks.
I especially like putting my future in the hands of folks who want tax revenues to go to yacht owners to hire the unemployable youths to fix up their boats.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/02/tales_of_stimulus_pork.html>Up yours,Josh!
Posted by: clarice | February 05, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Yeesh. Ezra Klein and Josh Marshall. Give me cousin Bill and the real mosquitos - socially acceptable to slap them to death, and they suck less.
Posted by: bgates | February 05, 2009 at 01:09 PM
I brought up the 2002 Iraq War Resolution on a lefty blog once, and I was told by several people the difference is the Iraq War was based on a lie, and this is a real emergency.
Posted by: MayBee | February 05, 2009 at 01:14 PM
Oh yah, Josh's approach to information management always smacked of the authoritarian.
=========================================
Posted by: kim | February 05, 2009 at 01:19 PM
bgates: and you can even buy stuff to keep them off you. Well, at least the mosquitoes.
Posted by: Amused bystander | February 05, 2009 at 01:22 PM
Are we still on tragedy with this bill? It feels like we've move on to farce.
Posted by: Jim Ryan | February 05, 2009 at 01:22 PM
LOL, bgates.
Posted by: Barney Frank | February 05, 2009 at 01:24 PM
Quick translation of Obama's "The time for talk is over"... I don't have any counter arguments to make so pass this now before the poll numbers get any worse...
Posted by: Ranger | February 05, 2009 at 01:26 PM
Also at Drudge - Ruth Bader Ginsburg hospitalized . . . cancer surgery. OMG is Doh'bama gonna get to pick a Supreme Court justice so soon?
Posted by: centralcal | February 05, 2009 at 01:29 PM
Once again, this proves that Obama “screwed the pooch” when he left the crafting of the “stimulus” to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.
If the press had vetted Obama even slightly better than a teenager scopes out a prepaid hooker, this inexperienced naive wouldn’t be POTUS.
Posted by: Neo | February 05, 2009 at 01:32 PM
Obummer must know that he's in deep poo if even John McCain and Lindsey Graham don't want to play bi-partisan!
No guts. If he believes in his "message" then he needs to quit whining and just go ahead and get it passed without a single republican vote. As he keeps on reminding us, he won.
Posted by: verner | February 05, 2009 at 01:33 PM
TyphusPad test - I can see comments in the column on the right but nothing shows under the post itself.
Have I mentioned that Six Apart Sux recently?
Posted by: Rick Ballard | February 05, 2009 at 01:36 PM
Obama probably talked this over with God and Tony Blair,He saw what they had wrought and it was good.
Posted by: PeterUK | February 05, 2009 at 01:39 PM
Rick, the only way to see new comments w/o waiting about 5-10 minutes for me to to do the html?cid=x thing on each thread. First we rout Congress--then typhus pad. And then anyone else who bothers me.
Posted by: clarice | February 05, 2009 at 01:41 PM
Clarice, what yachts are there to fix? $500,000 CEOs can't afford yachts...
Posted by: bad | February 05, 2009 at 01:44 PM
Harry Reid thinks they've got 60.
And I want to see the so called Republican that will vote for it. Any bets?
Oh, and read Shumers remarks at the end for a big laugh.
Posted by: verner | February 05, 2009 at 01:46 PM
Oh, article LUN
Posted by: verner | February 05, 2009 at 01:47 PM
From Verner's link:
"If they think they're going to rewrite this bill, President Obama is going to walk away," said Reid, when asked about efforts by about 20 centrists to lop off $100 billion to $200 billion from the cost of the package.
Is this code for O needs a cigarette and will be leaving WH grounds to smoke it?
Posted by: bad | February 05, 2009 at 01:54 PM
"If they think they're going to rewrite this bill, President Obama is going to walk away," said Reid,"
Not so much of a "uniter" then? Politics is about compromise,not taking your bat and ball home.
Posted by: PeterUK | February 05, 2009 at 01:58 PM
The Politics of Fear.
If there's a Republican who votes for this thing, he or she instantly becomes more distasteful than John McCain.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | February 05, 2009 at 02:04 PM
As far as not waiting 5-10 minutes, does the /comments/page/10000/#comments thingy work too, clarice? (I talked about it in this comment here: hey if I can do a permalink to a comment why can't the six apart doofuses do it?)
Posted by: cathyf | February 05, 2009 at 02:04 PM
Patsy Cline's "I Fall to Pieces" comes to mind.....the wheels are coming off. I take no joy in this, but the arrogance and incompetence are colossal.
Posted by: matt | February 05, 2009 at 02:05 PM
If they think they're going to rewrite this bill, President Obama is going to walk away
Could I also get a cheeseburger?
No, that's greedy. If they rewrite the bill and Obama leaves, that's more than enough to satisfy me.
Posted by: bgates | February 05, 2009 at 02:05 PM
Drudge is using a picture of O featuring a prominent teleprompter.
Posted by: bad | February 05, 2009 at 02:05 PM
The press is bitching about the lack of promptness in Gibb's appearance for briefings.
Posted by: bad | February 05, 2009 at 02:07 PM
Actually, if I use my Back button to go BACK to the page that I started typing into the comment box, place my cursor at the last comment before the comment box (which was the last comment on the thread when I started writing my comment) and hit "refresh" then my comment, and any intervening comments show up immediately.
The problem I am having is that like 10-30% of the time when I refresh a JOM window the page draws with the formatting all hosed up. Instead of three columns, just one long column, and no green background.
Posted by: cathyf | February 05, 2009 at 02:10 PM
Not so much of a "uniter" then? Politics is about compromise,not taking your bat and ball home.
He tried for 2 weeks to change the way Washington works, PUK. That's enough, don't you think?
Posted by: MayBee | February 05, 2009 at 02:10 PM
Buzz is that that Obama will get his bill.
Posted by: Amused bystander | February 05, 2009 at 02:19 PM
Maybee,
"He tried for 2 weeks to change the way Washington works, PUK. That's enough, don't you think?"
Much longer than this mayfly has applied himself before.
Posted by: PeterUK | February 05, 2009 at 02:22 PM
I take no joy in this
You're a better person than me - I take lots of joy in it.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 05, 2009 at 02:24 PM
I think Marshall is right about this: the only way for Republicans to win back the Congress and get the pork power for themselves is to sabotage Obama, let the economy fall to pieces, and then blame it all on the Democrats in 2010. We've got to stick to our talking points people!
NO to stimulus in 2009 = YES to GOP in 2010.
Posted by: Rocky O'Tootle | February 05, 2009 at 02:33 PM
Gibbs just cut off Jake Tapper.
He pissed Tapper off, then he cut him off.
Posted by: MayBee | February 05, 2009 at 02:36 PM
Maybee, I'm looking forward to Tapper's write-up of that exchange.
Posted by: bad | February 05, 2009 at 02:40 PM
sabotage Obama
Can I have that "dissent is the highest form of patriotism" bumper sticker you're not using anymore?
All the Republicans can do is protest. If Democrats want to vote for a hundred trillion dollar package (and I've asked my Democratic Senator to do just that) no one can stop them. As your god-king said, he won. So, they have the government. They get to govern.
let the economy fall to pieces
By letting the Democrats pass whatever legislation they want to, that is probably what will happen. People have to learn.
and then blame it all on the Democrats in 2010
Or give them credit if the bill works. Think positive, new troll.
Posted by: bgates | February 05, 2009 at 02:41 PM
I think Marshall is right about this: the only way for Republicans to win back the Congress and get the pork power for themselves is to sabotage Obama, let the economy fall to pieces, and then blame it all on the Democrats in 2010. We've got to stick to our talking points people!
NO to stimulus in 2009 = YES to GOP in 2010.
Posted by: Rocky O'Tootle | February 05, 2009 at 02:33 PM
Hmmm... lets rework this and see if it fits:
the only way for Democrats to win back the Congress and get the pork power for themselves is to sabotage Bush, let Iraq fall to pieces, and then blame it all on the Republicans in 2006. We've got to stick to our talking points people!
NO to victory in 2005 = YES to Dems in 2006.
Sound about right?
Posted by: Ranger | February 05, 2009 at 02:46 PM
I don't know if that works, cathyf. I just was astonished that using cid=x for the first time in ages I was able to see the posts in close to real time.
Posted by: clarice | February 05, 2009 at 02:52 PM
If it's going to pass the Senate today why does Obama need a press-event on Monday night and a full court press through the weekend. It passed the House by a wide margin, he has the votes for it to pass the Senate, and after it is tweaked in conference (plus it up with some more pork for Fat Murtha and Tax Cheat Rangel) it'll be on the President's desk by next week.
People wanted change.
Posted by: RichatUF | February 05, 2009 at 03:08 PM
Rich Sanchez (cnn) just said that Ben Nelson was could be one republican vote for the package. An infobabe - an attractive brunette - corrected him.
Josh Marshall is a tool of long standing - at least he took that brooding, pretentious photo off his blog. And I hate how he injects the "Denialist" trope into yet another contentious subject.
Posted by: Strawman Cometh | February 05, 2009 at 03:08 PM
How do people simultaneously argue for the bill AND say the Republicans (who can't stop the bill) are banking on the economy tanking if the bill passes?
Posted by: MayBee | February 05, 2009 at 03:10 PM
Maybee, I think pointing out that lack of logic is old politics as usual.
Posted by: bad | February 05, 2009 at 03:13 PM
cathyf, from your comment in the other thread
This seems potentially interesting, because I don't think that url would go to the end of thread, because the "CID" is upper-case. I've only been able to get it to work in lower-case, so I concluded that whatever their scripting language is has case-sensitivity to querystring parameters (which seems pretty dumb, since people can type urls). I know TM used this a few times, but "CID" just takes me to the first page, as if there wasn't a querystring at all. Maybe the problem related to that?
Posted by: Extraneus | February 05, 2009 at 03:18 PM
Strawman Cometh has the right of it: Marshall's hilarious pretensions of clear-eyed empiricism are well-known.
Posted by: BC | February 05, 2009 at 03:29 PM
IIRC Reid also said they';d stopped the Patriot Bill.
Posted by: clarice | February 05, 2009 at 03:33 PM
Maybee,
Rush makes the opposite point , that 0 wants the repubs on board the package so that they can share the blame when it all goes down in flames.
We need a seat?
Posted by: Strawman Cometh | February 05, 2009 at 03:36 PM
Of course I didn't mean your comment was only "potentially" interesting. Far from it!
Posted by: Extraneus | February 05, 2009 at 03:40 PM
Well, I botched that. Tried to paste two url's in text, here's one -LUN - asking if it is too late for Gregg to say thanks but not thanks and keep his Senate seat
Posted by: Strawman Cometh | February 05, 2009 at 03:42 PM
The other is a request for A Markopolis thread and a link to his testimony. I would like to see Chaco's , Rick's and others here responses to his detailed suggestion for a complete overall and consolidation of the financial regulators.
Posted by: Strawman Cometh | February 05, 2009 at 03:46 PM
That would be a death blow. He could say that he learned more about the "stimulus" bill and its true objectives, and realized he couldn't support such destructive economic policies.
Posted by: Extraneus | February 05, 2009 at 03:52 PM
And a request for a Markopolis thread - his testimony LUN
Posted by: Strawman Cometh | February 05, 2009 at 03:53 PM
"If they think they're going to rewrite this bill, President Obama is going to walk away," said Reid,"
I want to see him stomp his feet.
Posted by: Jane | February 05, 2009 at 03:57 PM
"If they think they're going to rewrite this bill, President Obama is going to walk away," said Reid,"
Latest Rasmussen--37% support the stimulus.
Repubs to Obama---FU.
Posted by: verner | February 05, 2009 at 04:10 PM
Well, verner , he can always point to his successes in filling his cabinet slots.
Posted by: clarice | February 05, 2009 at 04:16 PM
Clarice, I'm starting to think he's going to have to fill the entire cabinet with Republicans--they're the only ones who pay their taxes.
Posted by: verner | February 05, 2009 at 04:26 PM
Latest Rasmussen--37% support the stimulus.
Repubs to Obama---FU.
That's more like "Country to Obama---FU."
Wasn't Bush supposedly without any standing whatsoever with approval numbers around there? Look for Barrack Hussein to plumb the approval numbers of Congress within a year.
Posted by: Pofarmer | February 05, 2009 at 04:59 PM
Verner, you are on a roll.
Posted by: clarice | February 05, 2009 at 05:10 PM
Translating this post's title into Arabic and back into English yields "Josh Marshall Pleads for Islam to Allah".
(not really.)
Posted by: bgates | February 05, 2009 at 05:20 PM
Wasn't Bush supposedly without any standing whatsoever with approval numbers around there?
No, mid-30's was the "worst numbers since ___" (Nixon, Truman...Caligula....) "No standing whatsoever" started around 28%.
Obama, by contrast, has the united support of the Hispanics (14%) and blacks (14%).
Except Etta James.
Posted by: bgates | February 05, 2009 at 05:22 PM
Posted by: cathyf | February 05, 2009 at 07:23 PM
Posted by: Antimedia | February 05, 2009 at 10:48 PM
If it's going to pass the Senate today why does Obama need a press-event on Monday night and a full court press through the weekend.
He's thinking that we'll all recoil in horror at the prospect of even more exposure to him and lobby our Senators to pass the bill: "Anything, anything! Just not more of *him* in our faces!"
Posted by: PD | February 06, 2009 at 09:04 PM
I concluded that whatever their scripting language is has case-sensitivity to querystring parameters (which seems pretty dumb, since people can type urls).
I have never written a script to check for parameter names on a case-insensitive basis. Yes, people can type URLs, but you don't expect them to type complicated ones like that. The script itself is supposed to properly generate its own URLs, not the user. Which is a measure of just how broken TypePad has become, that users are driven to the desperate measure of constructing these kinds of URLs.
Posted by: PD | February 06, 2009 at 09:07 PM
Re: Kim's and bgates' - submission to authority. I was remembering Oscar Wilde's: "America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between."
When people no longer own their homes or can afford their rents, here's my variation: "America is the only country that went from capitalism to serfdom without passing through communism."
Posted by: BR | February 07, 2009 at 06:32 PM