The Politico reports on what we hope is the on-going education of Barack Obama:
by: Jonathan Martin March 22, 2009 12:38 PM EST
The
leading liberal voices of the New York Times editorial pages all
criticized—and, in some cases, clobbered—President Obama on Sunday for
his handling of the economy and national security.
It's not unusual for Barack Obama to take a little friendly fire from
the Times. But it's perhaps unprecedented for him to get hit on the
same day by columnists Frank Rich, Thomas Friedman and Maureen Dowd—and
in the paper's lead editorial. Their critique punctuated a weekend that
started with a widely circulated blog post by Paul Krugman that said
the president’s yet to be announced bank rescue plan would almost
certainly fail.
The sentiment, coming just two months after the president was sworn in,
reflects elite opinion in the Washington-New York corridor that Obama
is increasingly overwhelmed, and not fully appreciative of the building
tsunami of populist outrage.
Oh, please - the sentiment reflects the realization by the Times commentariat that their colleague David Brooks got an audience with The One himself after penning a 'Bama-basher. As Gail Collins said, "I am so jealous".
Any chance that Obama learned something about the unintended consequences of opening a dialogue with an adversary?
Present
Posted by: Jimmy's Attack Rabbit | March 23, 2009 at 12:12 AM
Bitter AND cynical, TM.
I like that...
Posted by: bad | March 23, 2009 at 12:21 AM
Olivist!
[It's what Jeff Goldstein would say.]
Posted by: Fresh Air | March 23, 2009 at 02:12 AM
What has he ever learned except to hide?
Posted by: sbw | March 23, 2009 at 07:45 AM
"Oh, please - the sentiment reflects the realization by the Times commentariat that their colleague David Brooks got an audience with The One himself after penning a 'Bama-basher. As Gail Collins said, "I am so jealous".
Nail - Head.
Posted by: davod | March 23, 2009 at 07:57 AM
In case you missed this over the weekend:
LUN
Posted by: bad | March 23, 2009 at 08:36 AM
I thought it would take until the Fall before Obama angered the public enough to have Congress-critters run for their lives.
I was wrong .. it's been 60+ days
Obama now looks like a strong contender for the "evil FDR" award
I wonder who will replace Pelosi as Speaker ...
Posted by: Neo | March 23, 2009 at 08:58 AM
Really, TM. 666?
Posted by: bad | March 23, 2009 at 09:15 AM
And to think ... 2 years from now we will be looking back on this period and thinking .. you know, it was so much better then.
Now isn't that a scary thought.
Posted by: Neo | March 23, 2009 at 09:43 AM
I thought it would take until the Fall before Obama angered the public enough to have Congress-critters run for their lives.
And he had the nerve during the 60 Minutes interview to say that we cannot govern out of a sense of anger. I guess it's okay to stir up the public against AIG, though.
Posted by: PD | March 23, 2009 at 11:06 AM
PD, it didn't matter what Bammers the Clown said on 60 Minutes; just being on 60 Minutes was the idea. Welcome to the Rupert Pupkin administration.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 23, 2009 at 01:10 PM
California congressman Pete Stark has improperly claimed a Maryland lakefront home
It seems to me there is no proper way for a California congressman to claim a Maryland lakefront home.
Posted by: pagar | March 23, 2009 at 01:11 PM