The topic is Tim Geithner, Dead Secretary Walking, and his knowledge of the bitterly controversial AIG bonuses.
From the WSJ live-blog of Liddy's House appearance comes this nugget confirmed by a Rush Limbaugh transcript and supported by a TIME article below:
For completeness here is the Admin timeline with what looks like a Freudian slip by the carefully edited WaPo (my emphasis):
FWIW, the NY Times liveblogger Kate Phillips does not report the Garrett item, attributing this to Garrett at 1:49:
Well, Liddy's answer merits more attention. Roll the tape!
UPDATE: IF YOU CAN'T TRUST THE LEADER OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY...
Rush himself played some soundbites from the hearing, including this:
RUSH: ...Here's
the final bite. This is Ed Liddy talking to Scott Garrett. I just
told you about this, Republican, New Jersey. The question, "It's just
puzzling to me the White House now seems to be second-guessing the
decision that the Treasury secretary made if he allowed this to go
forward."
LIDDY: Yeah, I don't have a comment on that. I
talked to the Treasury secretary last week and he indicated to me that
the first he had heard of this whole situation was about a week before
that, so I don't know where all the rubber meets the road, so to speak.
Gosh it's funny how the Times and everyone else missed that. I can see covering for Obama but why cover for Geithner?
TRUST BUT VERIFY: The C-Span video confirms the Rush transcript - the 24:00 minute mark is a good place to come in but Liddy's fateful words follow the 25:30 minute mark.
[BELATED CONFIRMATION: The NY Times reports that Geithner was specifically asked about this in a March 3 Congressional hearing:
WASHINGTON — The question was direct and prescient. Representative Joseph Crowley, Democrat of New York, asked the Treasury secretary in an open hearing what could be done to stop American International Group from paying $165 million in bonuses to hundreds of employees in the very unit that had nearly destroyed the company.
Timothy F. Geithner, the Treasury secretary, responded by saying that executive pay in the financial industry had gotten “out of whack” in recent years, and pledged to crack down on exorbitant pay at companies like A.I.G. that were being bailed out with billons of taxpayer dollars.
Geithner goes on to explain that he had heard of the bonuses but not been fully briefed until March 10. Maybe he can chat with Scooter Libby about memory issues vexing busy men.
THE TIGHTENING NEWS: By way of the AllahPundit we learn that TIME has been told that the Fed flagged the AIG bonuses to Treasury on Feb 28, ten days before word percolated to Geithner. What an operation - Geithner was at the NY Fed working with Hank Paulson on these bailouts, was brought to Treasury to provide continuity, and now has forgotten everything prior to Jan 20, 2009. Geithner needs to bring on some senior staffers so he can fire someone. Inshallah.
HECKUVA JOB, TIMMY: The One speaks:
"I have complete confidence in Tim Geithner and my entire economic team," Obama said with Geithner at his side on the White House South Lawn.
HE HAS HIM CORNERED: David Freddoso has the Rush bit.
FREUD IS EVERYWHERE: I know they are a bit down on Obama just now but this reflexive Bush-bashing from the Chi Trib blog is ridiculous:
This appears to be a case where the government's right
hand didn't know what the left was doing. Treasury Secretary Tim
Geithner learned only last week about the bonuses, according to the
Bush Administration.
Yes, we all miss Ari and Dana and what's his name. But since this is the Obama Administration let me offer an editing suggestion: "This appears to be a case where the government's left hand didn't know what the far left hand was doing". Just trying to help.
A QUESTION TIM GEITHNER DOES NOT WANT TO BE ASKED JUST NOW:
- Hey, Tim, how's the family? Spending enough time with them?
ANY DAY NOW: "That's not the Tim Geithner I knew."
COME AGAIN? It's Ambinder versus Ambinder, all in one paragraph of a post titled "The Gloves Come Off":
This is more than tough rhetoric [He refers to Obama's teleprompter's current expressions of rage]: I take this to mean that the administration will use the AIG crisis to take a more active role than it otherwise would have. Wall Street has been waiting for the Treasury Department's plan to mitigate the poison and the credit-market-locking effect of toxic assets held by major banks. The administration's economic commanders would prefer to create public-private partnerships to remove those assets from the books of especially troubled institutions; the government and corporations would share the risks. When Obama says explicitly - "My interest is not protecting the banks," he's scaring that capital away. Why would a hedge fund want to subject itself to the scrutiny that AIG is currently receiving?
So Obama has taken off the gloves to battle his own economic commanders? Seems like an unfair fight - can't he just load the script in the prompter and have them fired.
On the other hand, if he means that the Administration will be taking a more active role in sowing confusion, well, mission accomplished.
WHO'S ON FIRST? Let's try to grasp this story. Sen. Dodd admits that, well, yes, he is in the Senate, unlike the Obama officials, and he did in fact stick in the Dodd Amendment that allowed past bonus agreements to remain in effect, thereby protecting the AIG contracts. But he only did it in response to pressure from Administration staffers!
Obama, for his part, affirms that he is in charge, then explains that:
"We didn't draft these contracts. But it is appropriate when you're in charge to make sure stuff doesn't happen like this," he said. "So we're going to do everything we can to fix it."
So when you're in charge is it also appropriate to communicate with your staff? Maybe someone could set up a meeting between Obama's teleprompter and the staffer's Blackberries.
Jake Tapper yesterday: It wasn't until Thursday, March 5, 2009, administration sources told ABC News, that officials of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York informed officials of the Treasury Department of the full extent of the $165 million in bonuses pending for the controversial Financial Products Subsidiary.
What did Treasury know prior to learning "the full extent" on March 5?
Posted by: DebinNC | March 18, 2009 at 04:55 PM
Great post!
We're covering this as well on COMMON CENTS...
http://www.commoncts.blogspot.com
Posted by: Steve | March 18, 2009 at 05:06 PM
The left hand is Timothy Geithner as Treasury Secretary.
The right hand is Timothy Geithner as President of the NY Fed.
Might be two different people. I'll check the telepromter.
Posted by: Gabriel Sutherland | March 18, 2009 at 05:07 PM
According to Greenberg the bonuses could be found as part of the annual reporting and anyone who did due diligence would have known about the bonuses last year.
Tell me again why Geithner is indispensible?
Posted by: Jane | March 18, 2009 at 05:11 PM
Because, Jane, it is very important to have a tax chiseler heading the Treasury Dept.
Any other questions?
I think it's be fun to lock Timothy, Dodd and Obama in a room together for a couple of hours with a chance to listen in.
But then I'm almost as evil as PUK.
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 05:21 PM
If at first you don't succeed, try younger.
He's the only nominee thus far to pass a confirmation.Posted by: Gabriel Sutherland | March 18, 2009 at 05:22 PM
tasked his legal team with finding a way not to stop the bonuses.
Well, at least they've succeeded at something.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | March 18, 2009 at 06:03 PM
I move to amend Clarice's suggestion to add the Hon. Barney Frank to the Timothy, Dodd, BHO discussion.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vjnjagvet | March 18, 2009 at 06:06 PM
via Hot Air: Time claims the NY Fed told Treasury on Feb. 28 of the AIG bonus problem.
Posted by: DebinNC | March 18, 2009 at 06:11 PM
with the smoking gun written into the legislation itself, I think someone in Congress knew, AIG certainly knew, and most likely, Geither knew very early on as well. After all, Treasury were one of the first to get copies of the bill and should have done their due diligence.
Of course Geithner may have been doing his 2008 taxes at the time and simply misunderestimated the complexity of the bill.
Posted by: matt | March 18, 2009 at 06:14 PM
clarice;
I think it would be much more fun if we locked them into a room together with a very hungry alligator. Chamberlain's theory at work.
Posted by: matt | March 18, 2009 at 06:16 PM
According to HuffPo, Dodd told CNN Treasury made him insert the bonus protection language in the bill. LUN
Posted by: DebinNC | March 18, 2009 at 06:24 PM
Questions Tim does not to want to be asked right now:
"Do you have any clue what you are doing?"
"If the economy is job 1, why have neither you nor President Obama staffed the top levels of the Treasury Department?"
"Who's more clueless and incompetent, you or Obama?"
Posted by: William Teach | March 18, 2009 at 06:25 PM
Jim R., I second your motion.
Did you see that Rahm Emmanuel backed off completely today (and Nancy Pelosi even put out an official statement) on the Veteran's health care issue?
Posted by: centralcal | March 18, 2009 at 06:26 PM
Kanjorski claimed to know in JANUARY. And then sent a letter to treasury.
Posted by: bad | March 18, 2009 at 06:31 PM
BREAKING NEWS
(tap tap tap, taptaptap tap)
Chris Dodd just announced that he did agree to put that language into the bill, but that Treasury made him do it.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | March 18, 2009 at 06:44 PM
"Who's more clueless and incompetent, you or Obama?"
Wow, you ask hard ones.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | March 18, 2009 at 06:45 PM
I was about to post that, Chaco--Curious no? What about his butt boys in the media who carried his denial ..HEH--Chris Dodd, burning bridges and his credibility every day.
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 06:51 PM
This bonus plan was put into place before AIG received it's first round of financing from the feds. The plan called for three payments. The first payment under the plan was made in December of 2008. The second was just made with the third coming late this year or early next. All of this was known (or could have been known) by reading AIG's public filings with the SEC. How is it credible that the government did not know about these bonuses (given that someone knew enough about them to write them into the Stimulus Bill)? On far less evidence Libby was convicted!
Posted by: David Walser | March 18, 2009 at 06:51 PM
Geithner gets help in --not knowing.
Could this be the reason Treasury seems almost desperate to keeep AIG in the news?
Bonus question --Will Citigroup realize he is gone?
Posted by: pagar | March 18, 2009 at 06:51 PM
Here's the video :
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2009/03/18/tsr.dodd.aig.bonus.intv.cnn>Dodd finally admits the obvious
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 06:52 PM
Just talked with my brother the fancy Park Avenue accountant.
He thinks Liddy should have stood up at the end of the meeting and announced his resignation, saying he didn't come out of retirement and take a $1 a year job to take this kind of crap.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | March 18, 2009 at 06:52 PM
Chris Dodd just announced that he did agree to put that language into the bill, but that Treasury made him do it.
Talk about your circular firing squad.
Posted by: Pofarmer | March 18, 2009 at 06:53 PM
Well, Clarice, Deb in NC beat us both with it.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | March 18, 2009 at 06:53 PM
Charlie:
Chris Dodd just announced that he did agree to put that language into the bill, but that Treasury made him do it.
We may never know, but I honestly suspect Obama is innocent on this point.
It's the teleprompter.
Posted by: hit and run | March 18, 2009 at 06:54 PM
Send a mash note to Marc Ambinder who ruined his reputation parroting Dodd's lie:
http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/03/dont_blame_chris_dodd_for_the_bonuses.php>never believe Dodd
Chaco, I'm with your brother.
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 06:56 PM
I'm getting scared of the teleprompter. What does it know and when did it know it?
Posted by: bad | March 18, 2009 at 06:58 PM
In sum, today's storyline is Dodd lied yesterday; he DID write the exception into law but he did it for Treasury; and then it is obvious Treasury knew way before this weekend. No?
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 06:58 PM
http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/03/dont_blame_chris_dodd_for_the_bonuses.php
So--now Dodd did write the exception into the law but he did it at Treasury's behest--so then Treasury knew a lot earlier than last week.
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 07:02 PM
Dodd's getting just about stinky enough for a successful run at the presidency.
Posted by: bad | March 18, 2009 at 07:04 PM
Late yesterday, AP said Washington knew about the bonuses: LUN
Posted by: bad | March 18, 2009 at 07:09 PM
Of course Geithner may have been doing his 2008 taxes at the time and simply misunderestimated the complexity of the bill.
That made me laugh.
Chris Dodd just announced that he did agree to put that language into the bill, but that Treasury made him do it.
Pardon my previous unexplained lie - or something. So what does the president have on him? It's not like we don't already know about the Irish cottage.
Oh and the latest podcast of FWDAJ is up (LUN) if you haven't had enough of me.
Posted by: Jane | March 18, 2009 at 07:13 PM
Sure looks like a bunch of liars got together and figured the story wouldn't hold and they'd better come clean--at least just clean enough to stick it to Tim.
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 07:13 PM
HMMMMM, Dodd is looking weaker and weaker for re-election with scandal on top of lie on top of scandal on top of lie.
And...
Gary Locke has http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gE6wYFN36opv6FktUqoAjMgn1qCQD970I6FO0>yet to be confirmed and has http://townhall.com/columnists/MichelleMalkin/2009/02/27/obamas_new_commerce_secretary_nominee_not_so_squeaky_clean>his own , uh, issues.
NEXT MOVE: Dodd for Commerce Secretary
Posted by: hit and run | March 18, 2009 at 07:17 PM
Boy, that post is hard to fill, it seems. Wonder why?
Must be the Israel Lobby.
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 07:21 PM
We've now lived in NC for 4 years. And I may be the only person in the state who doesn't care about college basketball, and who doesn't have a particular team he roots for.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/03/18/coack-k-disses-obamas-basketball-picks/>Until Now
Posted by: hit and run | March 18, 2009 at 07:24 PM
Dodd's toast, why don't we put up TM for his seat?
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 07:25 PM
We may never know, but I honestly suspect Obama is innocent on this point.
Or naive and out of his depth.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | March 18, 2009 at 07:25 PM
may be the only person in the state who doesn't care about college basketball, and who doesn't have a particular team he roots for.
Dooook!
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | March 18, 2009 at 07:28 PM
I hate Typepads guts!!! It is like trying to run a 440 on a track full of molasses.
We got 10 AIG comment lines going on and I can't tell who said what, when, where or why. Argggh. I got more hot steam coming out of my ears than Mt Redoubt
Posted by: daddy | March 18, 2009 at 07:28 PM
ditto, daddy--it's really bad tonight.. I can't even see my own posts until about 10 minutes after they're posted.
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 07:33 PM
Are the names of mortgage bailout recipients going to be released?
Posted by: bad | March 18, 2009 at 07:34 PM
at least just clean enough to stick it to Tim
Zero isn't going to get rid of Geithner any time soon. Especially after basking in the glory of the 'come to Jesus' meeting in Orange county.
Posted by: glasater | March 18, 2009 at 07:36 PM
"I think it's be fun to lock Timothy, Dodd and Obama in a room together for a couple of hours with a chance to listen in."
Wouldn't it better even more evil to put each of these people in a room with Obama,one at a time,then compare the tapes afterwards?
Posted by: PeterUK | March 18, 2009 at 07:45 PM
Hit and Run, I live in NC, couldn't care less about college bball, and I live in the Triangle, with State, Duke, and Carolina fans all around me. Course, I went to ECU, where we were rarely sure we had a bball team.
I have Duke going all the way in my pool, filled 'em out yesterday
Posted by: William Teach | March 18, 2009 at 07:57 PM
In that CNN video Clarice posted, I heard Dodd speak of working "with the administration" (not "Treasury") six weeks ago to draft that amendment. I hope BO doesn't get away with "courageously" telling Leno tonight, "The buck stops with me" while simultaneously pointing fingers at Treasury..especially given his failure to staff it.
Posted by: DebinNC | March 18, 2009 at 08:06 PM
Who threatened to finger Dodd if he didn't come clean? I really think this sinks his already poor re-election chances.
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 08:14 PM
bad-
Recipients are LUN.
Posted by: mel | March 18, 2009 at 08:15 PM
LOL Mel
Posted by: bad | March 18, 2009 at 08:18 PM
clarice-
Dodd's scrambling for the campaign, and is being given his "head" by the admin. Simple as that. He's trying the "triangulation" gambit, and making the run as the anti-Obama dem. Betcha Rahm signed off on it.
Haven't you all figured out the teleprompter game yet?
Sheesh, I thought you guys would pick up on it sooner. LUN.
Posted by: mel | March 18, 2009 at 08:22 PM
You all need to get off the "bonus trap" being laid so cleanly at your feet. The longer cash stays stymied, the bigger the problem they get to "fix". Bernanke's onto 'em and is trying to fight with the tools he's got.
I wonder what the blast back will be for the Fed's action this afternoon. Some new taxes, I bet, to take it ALL back.
Gotta go.
Night all.
Posted by: mel | March 18, 2009 at 08:27 PM
Clarice:
I really think this sinks his already poor re-election chances.
I'm telling you, he's perfect for Commerce.
Posted by: hit and run | March 18, 2009 at 08:30 PM
Zero's Teleprompter is facing a problem. It knows that the only way to restore some semblance of confidence in the Teleprompter's Administration is to announce that Paul Volcker has taken over as Treasury Secretary (the excuse for Geithner will be that he needs to spend time getting familiar with TurboTax 2008). But Volcker is a respected figure who will not be pushed around by the Teleprompter. And if the Teleprompter grows weary of Volcker, firing Volcker is not an option.
It is one thing to control folks such as AIG Bonus Baby Obama and Turbo Timmy, but controlling the man who, along with the Gipper, got us out of the 70s and early 80s doldrums is another matter.
I blame Bush for this. By winning in 2000 and 2004 and by thinking for himself, Bush prevented the Teleprompter from gaining the necessary experience to deal with delicate personnel matters.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | March 18, 2009 at 08:32 PM
Hit, we run TM for Dodd's seat--just get his video yesterday denying he authored the exception and his video today admitting he did author it. Paste them together..and put a little slogan for TM on the bottom--like he tells the same story every day.
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 08:40 PM
Roll the tape!
Ooppss !! 18 minute gap
Posted by: Neo | March 18, 2009 at 08:50 PM
For conspiracy theorists, Liddy is Libby with the bb's backward. Another link to Val and Joe on JOM!
Posted by: Barry Dauphin | March 18, 2009 at 08:53 PM
Geithner is just waiting for the next bus to come along.
Posted by: Barry Dauphin | March 18, 2009 at 08:54 PM
It would be very wrong, I know, but in the spirit of Sarah is the mother of Bristol's baby we could suggest Geithner is Secy of Treasury because he's really Obama's brother.I mean his father was Mrs. Soetero's paymaster in Pahkeyston
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 09:01 PM
"Hey! Mr. Teleprompter, read a speach for me,
I'm not sleepy and there is no place I'm going to.
Hey! Mr. Teleprompter, make a special plea,
In the jingle jangle morning I'll come followin' you".
Posted by: PeterUK | March 18, 2009 at 09:09 PM
Clarice:
Hit, we run TM for Dodd's seat
Well. Glenn has been hammering Dodd for a good long while now ... and was calling for a challenger to Dodd a while back. I kept begging him to suggest TM specifically on Instapundit, I mean all those links, you know how much he likes him ... and yet, it was to no avail.
There was something or other a few weeks ago (I honestly can't remember what it was) in which I started a comment here saying I would quit my job (good thing I didn't do that or otherwise I wouldn't be enjoying this big, fat severance now!), move to CT and park out on TM's front lawn drinking a case of beer a day until he entered the race for Dodd's seat.
But let's not get carried away and say that I am really all that in to the idea.
Afterall, I was unsuccessful in the first case, and chickened out in the second.
(would he consider a run against Jim Hines may be the real question)
Posted by: hit and run | March 18, 2009 at 09:30 PM
Just One Senator '10
Posted by: Jim Ryan | March 18, 2009 at 09:39 PM
Have a laugh watch Glenn Greenwald's tap dance on Dodd:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/03/17/dodd/
Has anyone checked up on Hamsher, who like Freenwald and Marc Ambinder were buying Dodd's lie?
Were the 8:45 echo chamberists taken for a really good ride?
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 09:49 PM
That was deeply twisted, Clarice, I think it was Indonesia by the way, but reality is proving stranger than any thing McCarry, Drury, Frey(Steven not Patrick) and Michael Thomas, could come up and put in a blender.
Posted by: narciso | March 18, 2009 at 10:06 PM
Chris Dodd assured me that he was Presidential timber. Well, all I can say to that is... TIMBER!
Posted by: Crew v1.0 | March 18, 2009 at 10:08 PM
Indonesia was it, Narciso? Ah. Well. In any event it is no more twisted than Sarah's really the mother of Bristol's baby, is it?
Read the Greenwald carp--It is beyond belief how fancy a tap dance he can do about a lying pinhead.
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 10:21 PM
Clarice, this guy defended a neo nazi clansman preacher wannabe attorney, one of his partners in the venture now defends Gitmo detainees, I know you're not supposed to criticize attorneys for their clients; but that's a beaut, what are the odds.
You're right, your scenario is downright pedestrian compared to the Changeling/Omen
tableau that the birthers had to visualize
to come to their delusion, but Andrew Sullivan and Henry Blodget went there among others have gone there.
Posted by: narciso | March 18, 2009 at 10:30 PM
My apologies if this has been discussed before, but it seems important enough to mention, even if it is not new.
According to Andrew Sorkin of the NYT, the man who arranged the AIG bailout last fall was (drum roll) Timothy Geithner.
And if you believe Gretchen Morgenson, also of the NYT, the AIG bailout is a real mess. From the taxpayer's point of view.
Posted by: Jim Miller | March 18, 2009 at 10:36 PM
Dodd's scrambling for the campaign, and is being given his "head" by the admin. Simple as 中国公文网 中国皮肤网
Posted by: fdf | March 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM
fdf-
Thanks, I'm glad you clarified everything for me.
I'll stick with the local stuff. LUN
Posted by: mel | March 18, 2009 at 10:45 PM
Barry D,
I buy your double L (Libby/Liddy) Conspiracy Theory. After all, Superman bought it:
Lana Lang
Lois Lane
Lori Lemeris (His mermade girlfriend from Atlantis) and
Lex Luthor
Libby/Liddy fit right in.
Hit, (Doook?) My man, we need to talk.
Posted by: Daddy | March 18, 2009 at 10:46 PM
This article, by a former administration official, suggests some of the facts behind those odd fictional angles to theGeithner/
Dunham/Soetoro dynamic. Geithner pere, was in AID in Rhodesia and Thailand before moving to the Ford Foundation; and we know
what AID has been known for in certain countries. Could this explain how he's been
able to skate on this whole series of controversies; why he might have this jaded
perspective about paying taxes.
Posted by: narciso | March 18, 2009 at 10:47 PM
Almost ALL the IMF and WB folks --in fact..most international org employees feel they are above such things as taxes--They feel entitled to everything.
No. My storyline is complete carp, but I threw it out for those who forgot how absurd even the Palin haters as popular as Sullivan are.
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM
"Who's more clueless and incompetent, you or Obama?"
Wow, you ask hard ones.
Actually, to get the answer, you just need to ask the teleprompter. It has all the answers. And yes, it is official, Michelle will announce that the teleprompter has now replaced the ouija board
Posted by: Aaron | March 18, 2009 at 11:02 PM
Why not demand Ambassador Richard Holbrooke testify? Holbrooke was an AIG Board Member for 7 years. He bailed in July 2008 just before the crisis went public. Holbrooke must have known.
Posted by: Dennis D | March 18, 2009 at 11:18 PM
You know, aaron, I seriously doubt that the bonuses struck anyone as a big deal when Holbrooke left; when the bailouts began or until a week or so ago when the public looked at the vast sums being spent on obviously counterproductive carp.
In a way this is like Plame's employment at the CIA. It really didn't strike anyone as significant until David Corn packaged it falsely as the deliberate outing of a covert spy.
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 11:22 PM
jeez, I didn't know we could play Mahjong here now.
Puhleez don't tell me that fdf is writing the game rules!
Posted by: centralcal | March 18, 2009 at 11:24 PM
Sorry . I intended my last comment to Dennis, not aaron to whom I misaddressed it.
Posted by: clarice | March 18, 2009 at 11:47 PM
Fdf, I've always wondered what the han zi for '.com' was. Not clear what the "China document network" was for, and the "China skin network" was a disappointment.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | March 19, 2009 at 01:14 AM
Last night, Tapper reported in the WH "Tick Tock" of the bonus debacle that Geithner had "recused himself" from AIG business with the Fed sometime in November, after his Treasury Secretary nomination.
I know. It didn't make any sense to me either.
This all could have been avoided had Obama just said no to outrage.
Posted by: MayBee | March 19, 2009 at 01:53 AM
According to Andrew Napalitano, Fox News Legal Analyst, AIG notified the US Treasury of their compensation contracts on November 9, 2008. He was just waving around documents he somehow has a copy of from AIG.
This was on Fox Business News "Happy Hour" show.
Posted by: Gabriel Sutherland | March 19, 2009 at 02:13 AM
hit and run: lol
The word around my office pool is that everyone is trying to add Obama's picks to our pool. Apparently he selected winners all the way to the title game, but he chose himself as the winner.
He won after all. And he went to Harvard.
Posted by: Gabriel Sutherland | March 19, 2009 at 02:16 AM
The word around my office pool is that everyone is trying to add Obama's picks to our pool.
Has anyone noted that Obama is telling 63 groups of young African American men, "I hope you fail"?
Posted by: bgates | March 19, 2009 at 02:35 AM
I am severely bummed:(
Obama picked my team, the UNC Tarheels' to win it all, and every decision he has ever made has wound up turning out colossally dicked up. Why the Hell didn't the SOB leave well enough alone and go ahead and pick Duke? Crud.
Posted by: daddy | March 19, 2009 at 02:44 AM
I do believe the stimulus bill is the result of Timmay, Dodd, Frank, and Obama locked in a room together with a crocodile.
But is the crocodile special interests or the ethics committee?
Posted by: FeFe | March 19, 2009 at 03:42 AM
Roy, bless his everlovin' heart, needed someone else's recruiting to win his only championship.
===============================================
Posted by: kim | March 19, 2009 at 07:34 AM
Kim,
Do you think I can get Obama to go back retroactively and pick Duke? Is that Constitutional? Man, maybe I was a tad hasty in damning this retroactive business.
Posted by: daddy | March 19, 2009 at 07:51 AM
Go Duke!
Posted by: hit and run | March 19, 2009 at 08:00 AM
Captain Hate, Help!
Do you think there's still time to slap some sense into our man Hit here, or is it hopeless?
Posted by: daddy | March 19, 2009 at 08:05 AM
Actually, I've got a neighbor who may have a lead for me on a job ... who is a Carolina fan.
Go Tar Heels!
Posted by: hit and run | March 19, 2009 at 08:16 AM
How is it that "fill out the brackets" a Presidential level duty?
Nice to know in the middle of "the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression" Obama can can play games.
Posted by: RichatUF | March 19, 2009 at 08:35 AM
Go Hit! And if it will help, I'll root for whoever you want!
Nice to know in the middle of "the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression" Obama can can play
Seems to me that is all he has been doing.
Posted by: Jane | March 19, 2009 at 08:41 AM
Timmeh !!!
Posted by: Robbins Mitchell | March 19, 2009 at 09:43 AM
Coach K for President!
Posted by: JB | March 19, 2009 at 09:54 AM
The Chicago Tribune blogger (their "journalist" Frank "Bush-hater" James) has already rewritten his blog piece to delete mention of the Bush administration vouching for Memory-Loss Geithner.
The MSM would make George Orwell proud.
Posted by: Bruce | March 19, 2009 at 10:58 AM
It's hard to believe, but the President has given me a reason to root for Duke.
All he has to do now is find a reason for me to root for the Michigan Wolverines and my life can end.
Posted by: Gabriel Sutherland | March 19, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Does it matter who put it in? They all voted for it and passed it. They all had the chance to reject the bill.
Just another manufactured problem for increased federal government involvement in our economy.
Posted by: Tim | March 19, 2009 at 11:31 AM
Does anyone know if Jay Leno has paid all his taxes? I mean he could really make a name for himself by asking Obama about all the AIG PAC money he received (and it was from Financial Products division) and also about his timeline. Then he would become the next road kill by the Gibbs bus and see his new shows ratings skyrocket leading to Proctor and Gamble increasing their ad budget thereby further stimulating the economy.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | March 19, 2009 at 11:36 AM
The AIG Mystery Deepens [David Freddoso]
Is there anything to this or just Nancy being Nancy.....
Posted by: bad | March 19, 2009 at 12:51 PM
LUN to The Hill article on Pelosi, the AIG provision, and how the House is blameless.
Posted by: bad | March 19, 2009 at 01:00 PM
I would dearly love to see a U.S. Navy ship's captain run his ship aground and then use any or all of the excuses which the Oboy administration/Congress have given as to why maybe some pod people did all of this.
Posted by: Leo Wagner | March 19, 2009 at 01:08 PM