Larry Summers cashed in nicely before joining the Adminstration that is publicly down on Wall Street compensation:
Lawrence H. Summers, one of President Obama's top economic advisers, collected roughly $5.2 million in compensation from hedge fund D.E. Shaw over the past year and was paid more than $2.7 million in speaking fees by several troubled Wall Street firms and other organizations.
That brings to mind this detail from the account of Obama's "Pitchfork" meeting with top bank executives(my emphasis):
From the White House, there were five principal attendees: chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, who arrived a few minutes late, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Council of Economic Advisers chairwoman Christina Romer, senior adviser Valerie Jarrett and director of the National Economic Council Larry Summers. Uncharacteristically, Summers said almost nothing, and it appeared to one participant as if he had been told to remain silent.
Yes, his speaking fee had not been agreed.
Moe Lane has more on the pitchforks.
fixed Moe Lane link LUN
Posted by: Strawman Cometh | April 04, 2009 at 11:20 AM
What a crock. Here he "defends" Wall Street in January, months before the AIG mess:
And, of course, his famous AIG quote (back before we knew his team had insisted Dodd insert the authorization language in the Porkulus bill): He's been leading the angry peasants from day one . . . and only stopped rabble rousing when his own involvement became obvious. Pretending to be the bankers' pal in a "private" meeting is priceless. I wonder when the next Dem fundraiser is scheduled.Posted by: Cecil Turner | April 04, 2009 at 11:29 AM
Good for Larry. He's probably thinking "Good God--and I thought the Harvard faculty were insane lefties."
Posted by: Boatbuilder | April 04, 2009 at 01:16 PM
If mainstream media is reluctant to cover anti-tax tea parties, in A toast to tea parties I list some ideas the MSM should cover.
Posted by: sbw | April 04, 2009 at 01:23 PM
SBW--Why not forward that to AT with permission to reprint it? The editor may be out for much of the day because his daughter's getting married so you might not get an immediate response.
Posted by: clarice | April 04, 2009 at 01:31 PM
SBW, +1 on Clarice's suggestion.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | April 04, 2009 at 01:37 PM
I wish I was concise as this guy, an IT somewhere in California, who labeled the
components behind PDS, in that piece that appeared in Free Republic, but he's really
layed out the insanity in which we live in today:
So let’s see…if you’re all out of money, the thing to do is spend more money you don’t have. We add that one to the list that says when there’s an energy crisis because gas and oil are getting expensive, you need to keep the oil in the ground and burn food to make the cars go. When America faces an economic crisis from a bunch of companies failing you give the companies a whole lot of money other people have earned from doing other things…and if you find a tenth of a percent of it has gone toward bonuses, be sure and get the word out that nobody can personally benefit too much from saving these companies whose failure would surely be devastating to our economy.
This is way beyond Orwell. It’s a Bizarro world just like out of Superman comics. Recklessness is frugal, frugality is reckless, perverts are normal, normal people are perverts, spending money is saving it, saving it is wasting it, the way to “lead” a nation that is depressed is to talk some smack about it every chance you get (on foreign soil); and the solution to every single problem involving scarcity is to make it more difficult and expensive to produce whatever is scarce.
For the record, M.K. Freedberg thinks this is a passing phase, like the flu, I'm beginning to think it's more like ebola,
leaving more disfiguring remnants
Posted by: narciso | April 04, 2009 at 01:38 PM
I think what we have here is Tom-Daschle-in-reverse.
Tom Daschle turned his PREVIOUS public service into a personal windfall.
Summers appears to have cashed in on Wall Street's belief that he would have influence in the NEXT administration. Kind of a PRE-leverage of influence.
Posted by: jeanne | April 04, 2009 at 01:57 PM
Phew, narciso, I thought this was Opposite Year or something.
Posted by: clarice | April 04, 2009 at 01:58 PM
It's very much an opposite year, Clarice, but I have little to do with it. The colon should have been the tip off or the line breaks.
Posted by: narciso | April 04, 2009 at 02:26 PM
shouldn't the pitchfork party be directed at the idiots in Washington who set the ground rules for Wall Street's irrational exuberance?
Barney Frank, Chris Dodd,Phil Gramm (yes, he was responsible for much of the deregulation),and the rest of the clown show all bear as much responsibility as the grifters in New York.
Posted by: matt | April 04, 2009 at 02:58 PM
Hi, Clarice and ChaCo. I passed the toast to tea parties on to AT. Thanks for the suggestion. /sbw
Posted by: sbw | April 04, 2009 at 03:00 PM
fixed Moe Lane link
Thanks for fixing the link. Did those bankers just sit there and take it when our affirmative action president was shaking them down like the street punk he's always been? It would've been a good time for a John Galt to appear and send President 666 out for a smoke break.
Posted by: Captain Hate | April 04, 2009 at 03:19 PM
Outrageous! It is time for Larry Summers to go. Larry Summers
1 Must be fired for his dishonesty, lack of integrity, huge conflict of interest, and lack of moral fiber. Is this who should be advising Obama on financial issues and the economy?
2. Should donate the $8 million he earned to charities to help the millions of Americans struggling to put food on the table now.
Need more?
1. Larry Summers fired Iris Mack, PhD, for blowing the whistle:
Check out the whole story here: http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/04/larry_summers_ignored_frightening_trading_practice.php
2. Conflict of interest: Summers is a managing director of the hedge fund D. E. Shaw & Co. Did he try to help his friends and himself by continuing to bail out businesses? You bet.
3. Andrei Shleifer, a close friend of Summers cost Harvard a $26 million settlement with the U.S. government. A federal court found Shleifer liable for conspiracy to defraud the U.S. Government, after Shleifer violated conflict-of-interest rules by making secret investments in Russia at the same time he was working for a Harvard group contracted by the U.S. Government to advise the Russian government. While Shleifer was being investigated, Summers pushed to have Shleifer promoted to a prominent chair at Harvard. http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/Against-Larry-Summers-the-by-John-Wilson-081106-709.html
4. Summers was a main player in financial deregulation, a primary cause of the present economic crisis. Summers sought to silence Brooksley Born, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, who correctly foresaw that unregulated derivatives trading could put other financial markets at risk. While Born attempted to draft regulations to address this risk, Summers and his cronies accused her of fostering a financial crisis. Congress, apparently under pressure from Summers et al, suspended Born’s Commissions’ regulatory authority. Born then left her position as head of the Commission. “It was Larry Summers who called her up and screamed at her,” according to Siskind, who notes that the financial meltdown might have been averted if Summers had listened to Born (a woman). http://thenewagenda.net/2008/11/09/the-boston-globe-on-summers-and-the-new-agenda/
5. While at the World Bank, Summers signed a memo that declared: “Just between you and me, shouldn't the World Bank be encouraging MORE migration of the dirty industries to the LDCs [Least Developed Countries]?” The memo noted, “I think the economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable and we should face up to that.” http://www.whirledbank.org/ourwords/summers.html
The guy has got to go.
Posted by: Kelly M. | April 04, 2009 at 03:26 PM
Amateur hour continues: Obama Administration looking for ways around their own rules, to encourage business participation.
Rules, like taxes, are for Republicans.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | April 04, 2009 at 03:29 PM
Barney Frank, Chris Dodd,Phil Gramm (yes, he was responsible for much of the deregulation),and the rest of the clown show all bear as much responsibility as the grifters in New York.
You know, I'm going to ask you a question that I often ask in this context: which regulation was removed that led to this? But don't just say "Glass Steagal repeal" because (a) it wasn't a simple repeal, and (b) I want some specific causal connection.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | April 04, 2009 at 03:32 PM
Note, btw, that failing to create NEW regulations (as you describe) is not the same as DEregulation.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | April 04, 2009 at 03:33 PM
It appears that Geinther was also specifically involved in changing regulations to make CDS easier to trade. I beleive the article was in the Washington post. The whole crew in this up to their ears.
Posted by: Pofarmer | April 04, 2009 at 04:21 PM
President Pitchfork's Administration.
Posted by: PeterUK | April 04, 2009 at 06:04 PM
Seems simple to me.
Summers gives back the money and stays
or
Summers keeps the money and goes.
Am I missing something? Honesty?
Similarly, with regard to AIG donations to Obama:
Obama gives back the money and stays
or Obama keeps the money and goes.
Am I missing something? A nuance?
It is a small amount for him, but it would be a larger amount for me.
Posted by: Thomas Esmond Knox | April 05, 2009 at 06:52 AM
I think Geithner has recently had his forehead botoxed.
Posted by: MayBee | April 06, 2009 at 08:39 PM