The NY Times writes on Obama's pending flip-flops evolution on gay issues and leaves us pining for a series of stylistic and usage rulings from William Safire.
First, this, with my emphasis:
"Gay men and lesbians"? Shouldn't that (or at least, couldn't that) be "Gay men and women"? When people talk about "gay marriage", "gay" means "homosexual", not "male homosexual".
As we press on, the Times tries again:
As the Times will eventually explain (or see The Politico), the two "openly gay" candidates are women. Shouldn't they be described as "lesbian", to be consistent with the citations which make a distinction between gay men and lesbians? Why, in this sentence, has "gay" flipped back to meaning "homosexual" with no connotation of maleness?
A bit later:
Hmm - the gay group cited by The Politico is the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund, which is part of the Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Alliance. Presumably, the gay/lesbian distinction means something to someone there. Is the Times being insensitive by ignoring that? Hard to believe.
In the balance of the story the Times uses "gay" as a synonym for "homsexual", with no maleness. We even get this:
If the Times usage rule the rule is that "gay" means either homosexual or homosexual male depending on context but "lesbian" refers exclusively to homosexual women, fine. If the day comes when the interests of the groups divide, I suppose the Times will be there to restore the distinction. If I were a lesbian feminist (or capable of channeling one) I would be irked by the male takeover, but I leave it to the Times to deal with that.
Somewhat more substantively, this is a laugher:
He is "open to the possibility" that when the poll numbers in support of gay marriage improve he will abandon his current position of political convenience in favor of a new position of political convenience. Call it "fierce" advocacy!
Oh, that is so unfair, and what am I saying - Obama will admit that his thinking has evolved and he willl be hailed for his open-mindedness and personal growth.
Obama's only doing for Dick Cheney's daughter...who is a lesbian.
Posted by: bad | May 07, 2009 at 11:37 AM
Good luck with this. Figuring out when "gay" applies to both male and female, and when it's male only, is as fraught with risk as knowing when you're allowed to talk about "queers".
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | May 07, 2009 at 11:42 AM
As Elizabeth Edwards pointedly reminded us during the election, bad.
Pheh!
Who cares? Close your doors and do whatever you want-- just don't tell me about it. I don't even like hearing about the problems of strangers on airplanes-- what makes you think I care about who you sleep with?
Posted by: clarice | May 07, 2009 at 11:43 AM
lol Clarice. I'm with you. If someone wants to tell me bedroom tales they better be about home repairs or decorating... or something cute the kids or pets did.
Posted by: bad | May 07, 2009 at 11:50 AM
I cannot think of such escapades without recalling Nathan Lane and Robin Williams in "The Birdcage" aka "La Cage au Folles" with that delightful Hank Azaria as Spartacus the waiter who could not wear shoes without falling over. I laugh every time I see it.
All our politicians today are stuffed shirt politicians of the sort Gene Hackman played.
Posted by: sbw | May 07, 2009 at 12:07 PM
I hope Elizabeth, very soon, is able to understand this stage of her life is not about her-- it's about the ones she leaves behind.
Posted by: bad | May 07, 2009 at 12:12 PM
The resident lesbian told me at one point that the word "lesbian" creeps a lot of people out - which is why "gay" is an easy catch all.
"lesbian
lesbian
lesbian."
Posted by: Jane | May 07, 2009 at 12:14 PM
There are a couple of statistics on lesbians someone wrote about years ago that stuck in my mind.
One was that in an absolute closed lesbian society--AIDs was nonexistent.
And the other was that lesbians had sex on an average of once a month.
Posted by: glasater | May 07, 2009 at 12:41 PM
I think we've clearly drifted into the
"Bearded Spock" Universe. Two examples, the local Fox/Clear Channel station, called the
17 billion Defense cut, a chainsaw, nail clippers maybe. Also the Corner's Steven Hayward, normally a solid fellow, in the course of affirming Henninger's support of Reagan's principles, takes a cheap shot at
the only public figure, that really doesn't match the stereotype of politicians, sbw,
calls that amusing little speech I linked to a month ago, as "Castroesque" For the love of pete, there's someone out there who has a Castroesque vibe, and it's not her.
Posted by: narciso | May 07, 2009 at 12:52 PM
I cannot think of such escapades without recalling Nathan Lane and Robin Williams in "The Birdcage" aka "La Cage au Folles" with that delightful Hank Azaria as Spartacus the waiter who could not wear shoes without falling over. I laugh every time I see it.
I love that movie. I especially enjoy the fact that all in all, Robin Williams and Nathan Lane were a good couple and good parents.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | May 07, 2009 at 01:44 PM
narciso, I think his point was that her speech was overlong and a little unfocused, and compared to a Reagan spech as a good speech might compare to one of Castro's monologues.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | May 07, 2009 at 01:47 PM
And the other was that lesbians had sex on an average of once a month.
Golly, maybe I should be a lesbian.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | May 07, 2009 at 01:47 PM
lol Chaco
Posted by: bad | May 07, 2009 at 02:07 PM
Maybe so Charlie, but as compared to whom, I heard some of the speeches at CPAC,
leaving out Romney, and some were
inspirational but some dragged. Were all of Reagan's speeches pitch perfect?
Posted by: narciso | May 07, 2009 at 02:07 PM
Now how did this one get lost ?
Posted by: Neo | May 07, 2009 at 02:17 PM
Golly, maybe I should be a lesbian
Gee Charlie--as I remember--that statistic was for the younger one;)
Posted by: glasater | May 07, 2009 at 04:06 PM
There is nothing more boringly self-obsessed than those who insist on defining themselves by their sexuality.In some cases,it is a form of bullying.
Posted by: PeterUK | May 07, 2009 at 04:29 PM
Based on watching her pundit appearances in years past, I'd be immensely relieved if BO replaced Souter with Kathleen Sullivan.
Posted by: DebinNC | May 07, 2009 at 04:43 PM
La Cage au Folles
I love that movie. Part of the delight is seeing Robin Williams cast as the sane, restrained one.
Posted by: bad | May 07, 2009 at 05:31 PM
"Huh? You're from Lebanon? What does that have to do with buying you a drink?" Soylent asked her as the music pumped in the crowded nightclub.
Golly, maybe I should be a lesbian.
You know, I've always thought I had an inner lesbian trying to get out...
Posted by: Soylent Red | May 07, 2009 at 06:06 PM
Hey!
What happened to my formatting?
Posted by: Soylent Red | May 07, 2009 at 06:06 PM
Soylent--I'll never get you in the tango club with talk like that. (BTW I just learned yesterday that Robert Duvall is a descendent of Robt E Lee.)
Posted by: clarice | May 07, 2009 at 06:18 PM
I am lesbian, gay woman, whatever. It's all semantics. Not sure that it matters so much
Posted by: Lesbian Movie Guide | May 09, 2009 at 03:35 PM
I am lesbian, gay woman, whatever. It's all semantics. Not sure that it matters so much
Posted by: Lesbian Movie Guide | May 09, 2009 at 03:35 PM