We are going to give some props to the NY Times - on their "Politics" page under the section titled "Politics Headlines From Around the Web" they currently include a link to my post noting that in a Times interview Obama did support something akin to "death panels" and mocking the Times for being unable to research their own archives in tracing the source of the death panel rumors.
One hopes they are mulling the implications of Obama's earlier rhetoric.
NAW they just lost the e-mail addy for the flag WH site and knew if they pinned you to the bulletin board for their dwindling down to the humanity dregs liberal loon readership, so one else would nominate your for the IRS protoctology exam you so richly deserve!
Posted by: Gmax | August 15, 2009 at 11:34 AM
so = some
And my name is Clarice and I live in Georgetown if any of the licelike minions are looking for TM minions to gather up during the "cleansing"!!!
Posted by: Gmax | August 15, 2009 at 11:36 AM
WOW TM, I'm impressed. Congrats!
Posted by: Jane | August 15, 2009 at 11:43 AM
Looks like the NYT has noticed what a turkey the president is,and is looking for a member of the VRWC to suck hole to.
Posted by: PeterUK | August 15, 2009 at 12:30 PM
I reported myself as having read that very post to [email protected]
Posted by: Dorothy Jane | August 15, 2009 at 12:30 PM
Great news, TM, and a mention on "REdeye" now if they could get rid of the Greg Sargent link, unless it's a subtle hint
that's the way you don't do journalism.
BTW in the LUN, a hat tip that Lincoln Diaz Balart, is in the running to replace Martinez for the Senate, they'll probably
go safe with Smith or Bense, but it's a
sign of something.
Posted by: narciso | August 15, 2009 at 12:42 PM
"Mention" hell, it was the lead story and quoted pretty extensively.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | August 15, 2009 at 01:11 PM
My guess is, Tom, that when you called the NYTimes always reliable, they took that as a compliment.
Posted by: PaulL | August 15, 2009 at 01:42 PM
Hit, you have mail!!!!
Posted by: bad | August 15, 2009 at 02:32 PM
Got it...
Posted by: hit and run | August 15, 2009 at 02:48 PM
Props to you, TM, for actually crossing the NYTimes radar! Maybe while they're looking in, you should reprise your greatest hits on Krugman.
Posted by: JM Hanes | August 15, 2009 at 03:26 PM
Has anyone noticed TMs "evil mongering" heading at the top of the blog? I just noticed it.....
Posted by: bad | August 15, 2009 at 03:33 PM
are we evildoers yet?
Posted by: matt | August 15, 2009 at 03:50 PM
No, Matt, mongers just gather, son't actively participate, it's like a solar panel array
Posted by: narciso | August 15, 2009 at 03:58 PM
I saw it today or yesterday bad. I like it.
Posted by: Jane | August 15, 2009 at 04:32 PM
You will never get Obama and the left to now admit they will kill Grandma, but for years they have boasted that that is exactly how they planned to save money and pay for the uninsured.
Of course now they will couch it in terms of stopping 'unnecessary' and 'wasteful' practices.
But if you actually listen to their argument - they say private insurance companies deny care and kill people today - so what's the difference.
Today of course their is no difference really - except the morality of the state that believes it has infinite resources to go 12 trillion in debt - why wouldn't they spend another 1,000 dollars on a surgery?
But as Obama said before the SEIU - he wants to get to a single payer system in 10-20 years. Once you get to single payer - you also have a single decider.
Then you have no alternatives, you can't switch companies, you can't buy another policy, you can't pay out of pocket, because the government controls the resources.
As Obama himself has said - FedEx and UPS do pretty good, but that's only because they are not wrapped in a Federal blanket of control. Just try to get FedEx to send your package across the country overnight if the government mandates they can only bill you for 5-7 day delivery.
Posted by: Pops | August 15, 2009 at 04:37 PM
Wouldn't it have been wonderful if someone at Obamas town hall stood up and said:
Mr. President, I have the solution to health care for all; just give all Americans their own personal health care credit card with a limit of 12 Trillion dollars that they never have to re-pay.
Posted by: Pops | August 15, 2009 at 04:49 PM
Hey JOM evildoers,
Should we each pick a mob name?
I like Goldielocks, but think "Ann The Mannequin" probably fits better. :)
Posted by: Ann The Mannequin | August 15, 2009 at 04:59 PM
Ann, I'm going with "bad to the bone."
Posted by: bad to the bone | August 15, 2009 at 05:41 PM
Ladies. Please look at these before embarking on your downward path.
Posted by: PeterUK | August 15, 2009 at 06:04 PM
Thanks for the edification, PUK. I promise never to impregnate anyone and then ignore them...
Posted by: bad to the bone | August 15, 2009 at 06:08 PM
PUK,
I pass those everyday. :) We have six Hogarth's engravings and they line the hallway in our house.
I am sure they will be the first things sold, by our daughter, when we go over the river. :(
Posted by: Ann The Mannequin | August 15, 2009 at 06:28 PM
bttb,
That's easy for you to say!
Posted by: PeterUK | August 15, 2009 at 06:29 PM
a K Street allegory, PUK? Or would it be The Waxman's Progress?
Posted by: matt | August 15, 2009 at 06:32 PM
AtM,
Threaten to haunt her.
Posted by: PeterUK | August 15, 2009 at 06:42 PM
Matt,
Could be the Chicago Shyster.
Posted by: PeterUK | August 15, 2009 at 06:42 PM
PUK,
I saw the originals at the Soane Museum last October! Brilliant.
Posted by: Porchlight | August 15, 2009 at 07:00 PM
Congrats Tom! You are in the bigtime now!
Posted by: sylvia | August 15, 2009 at 07:09 PM
But as Obama said before the SEIU - he wants to get to a single payer system in 10-20 years. Once you get to single payer - you also have a single decider
Pops-
Wonder if Zero's planning on staying in office all that time to make sure his healthcare plans go into effect.
Posted by: "breaking glass"ater-mob moniker | August 15, 2009 at 07:17 PM
Looks like the NYT has noticed what a turkey the president is,and is looking for a member of the VRWC to suck hole to.
Too bad they didn't consult us earlier.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 15, 2009 at 07:19 PM
Major props for a major link to our host, TM.
Now, if we could only get Obama to read JOM, he might understand the "angry mob".
Posted by: glenda | August 15, 2009 at 07:25 PM
Were we told that Barbara Boxer has published a new novel?
I guess she read Tom Wolfe's A Man In Full.Posted by: Extraneus | August 15, 2009 at 07:26 PM
(If you've read Wolfe's book, you'll know what I mean when you get to "See Sex Scene #4" at the link.)
Posted by: Extraneus | August 15, 2009 at 07:43 PM
Good catch, Extraneus. Boxer is not only a bad writer, but an unoriginal one as well.
But don't senators usually write books so that their constituents can purchase them by the thousands as a way to cover up pay-to-play? Surely no one would buy it to actually read it. There was some Democrat back in the 80s who got caught at this game, I can't remember who.
Posted by: jimmyk | August 15, 2009 at 08:32 PM
Ex, I hated that book and gave it away, a very unusual thing for me.
Posted by: bad to the bone | August 15, 2009 at 08:37 PM
Really? I thought it was great. Why did you hate it?
Posted by: Extraneus | August 15, 2009 at 08:46 PM
I don't exactly recall, Ex, but think it had something to do with hating all of the characters.
Posted by: bad to the bone | August 15, 2009 at 08:54 PM
Heh. I didn't like them either, now that you mention it.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 15, 2009 at 08:59 PM
I had the same reaction to his "Charlotte" and "Bonfire of the Vanities."
Posted by: bad to the bone | August 15, 2009 at 09:05 PM
That was "Ft. Worthless" Jim Wright, jimmy, as Rush used to put it. Tom Wolfe's second offering really wasn't so good, Atlanta doesn't really compare with New York as a setting. His most recent which was eerily echoed the Duke University situation, was better. His next is set in Miami, with the whole cross cultural milieu, that one's going to be a scorcher
Posted by: the bishop | August 15, 2009 at 09:07 PM
I liked "Bonfire" hated the film version with the force of a thousand suns
Posted by: the bishop | August 15, 2009 at 09:33 PM
I also liked "Bonfire," didn't enjoy "Man in Full" as much, also didn't like the characters, and that horse sex scene was too much. I love Wolfe's non-fiction writing more than his fiction. He's perhaps the greatest chronicler of the second half of the 20th century, and his art/architecture critiques ("From Bauhaus to Our House," "The Painted Word") are a riot.
Posted by: jimmyk | August 15, 2009 at 10:12 PM
Congratulations, TM.Be careful--they might make you news editor.
Posted by: clarice | August 15, 2009 at 10:16 PM
I really liked A Man in Full though it certainly wasn't for love of the characters. I enjoyed the way he set the scene. Couldn't get into Bonfire, though I plan to try again, same with Charlotte Simmons. Really looking forward to the Miami novel.
Posted by: sylvia II | August 15, 2009 at 10:23 PM
You really have to be the contrarian, don't you,
Posted by: the bishop | August 15, 2009 at 10:24 PM
I can't wait for the one set in Miami, bishop. Do you know if it is finished? I think I saw an NRO interview a with him a few months back where he mentioned it. Love that guy.
Posted by: Porchlight | August 15, 2009 at 10:45 PM
--sylvia II--
Please no. Not two.
Posted by: Ignatz | August 15, 2009 at 10:50 PM
Posted by: Neo | August 15, 2009 at 10:56 PM
Porchlight-
Did you know your "mob name" is Fancy Pants?
Just got the Josephine Tey mystery and just in the nick of time. Was running out of Wodehouse novels.
Years ago I read The Right Stuff and Space at the same time. I still get those stories mixed up a bit.
Posted by: "breaking glass"ater-mob moniker | August 15, 2009 at 11:21 PM
With a title like "Back to the Blood" it's going to be a hot item, they may chase him away with a rake if his previous portrayals
are any indication,
Posted by: the bishop | August 15, 2009 at 11:33 PM
Here's a nice reminder from Redstate of the thing no lefty would ever do with our healthcare; deny treatment for disease but offer to kill you instead.
It's already happening.
Posted by: Ignatz | August 15, 2009 at 11:41 PM
Living close to the Oregon border and trying to help a young woman with a C7 spinal injury who was warehoused in an Oregon nursing home--I pretty well known of that state's health program.
All kinds of groups got together back when GHW Bush was in office and decided on some two hundred fifty health conditions they would cover and pay to treat.
It started with the best intentions but the state just flat ran out of money.
Thank goodness the young woman I was trying to help found employment and the love of her life in the Portland OR area and is last I heard is doing very well.
Posted by: "breaking glass"ater-mob moniker | August 16, 2009 at 12:59 AM
Night Crystal, the blessed thing of Wodehouse novels is that as memory eases, the supply becomes inexhaustible.
Posted by: Uncle Fred is always in the Springtime. | August 16, 2009 at 07:18 AM
breaking glass/ater,
Fancy Pants - I like it! Let me know how you like the Tey...I'm re-reading The Nine Tailors right now and enjoying it more than ever (this time focusing on the church architecture).
Posted by: Porch "Fancy Pants" Light | August 16, 2009 at 10:21 AM
the supply becomes inexhaustible
Heh-Good point and so true of many of the books tucked away:)
Fancy--Got a little concerned when I opened "The Daughter of Time" and saw that pedigree chart.
I thought--how many folks am I going to have to keep track of here anyway:)
Posted by: "breaking glass"ater-mob moniker | August 16, 2009 at 12:41 PM
It is daunting! I don't think you really have to keep track, but it's a handy reference. Fortunately it's a short book. ;)
Posted by: Porchlight | August 16, 2009 at 04:46 PM
Thanks Porchlight:)
I hope I get a chance down the road to report on the Tey book.
You and Kim are convincing me to get that trunk of books out of storage and resurrect Nine Tailor and the "Jeeves" series. Wodehouse and his humor have certainly helped cheer a dark mood or two. Plus, Melinda's jazz recommendations don't hurt:)
Posted by: glasater | August 16, 2009 at 10:45 PM