Fun from The Corner:
MAYBE KENNEDY SHOULD HAVE INVOKED CLOTURE: John Miller highlights this anecdote of Reagan filibustering Kennedy in an obligatory White House meeting to discuss a tariff proposal Reagan presumably opposed. Reagan-bashers will surely cite this as yet more evidence of a detached and confused President.
MORE ALTERNATIVE REALITY FROM THE SELF-INVENTED REALITY-BASED COMMUNITY: Jacob Weisberg of Slate pens a nostalgic but factually challenged Bush-basher. (Errata: Some Wiki-background on the Clear Skies Act, proposed by Bush and blocked by Dems favoring more stringent bills also covering carbon dioxide.)
IN WHICH I FIND MYSELF IN AGREEMENT WITH BOTH KENNEDY AND CLINTON:
From a Times preview of the upcoming Kennedy memoirs:
He was right!
And from the same source, here is Wild Bill on himself:
And he was right!
That Yale and Oxford education, didn't give Jake a lick of sense, than again Ponnuru's
Princeton sheepskin, has made him miss a few things as well.
Posted by: bishop | September 03, 2009 at 08:57 AM
Talking about Ted's memoirs; is it difficult to write a memoir while your brain is being eaten alive?
Still waiting for the announcement (ala Plame) that Hill is sending Bill to Afghanistan to investigate those homoerotic party boys.
Oh, for those whose computer screen needs cleaning - LUN.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | September 03, 2009 at 09:13 AM
Nice to see Levi Johnson back in the news.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32658521/ns/today-today_people
Levi Johnston: Lot of divorce talk in Palin home
He says she neglected parenting and governorship duties in favor of money
Posted by: Pofarmer | September 03, 2009 at 09:22 AM
Levi Johnson == Cindy Sheehan v2.0
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 03, 2009 at 09:26 AM
Rangel: 'Prejudice' Toward Obama Halting Health Care Reform
On topic.Posted by: Extraneus | September 03, 2009 at 09:34 AM
great takedown of Levi Johnston at Riehl World View. Sorry no lun, I'm late for work.
Posted by: peter | September 03, 2009 at 09:34 AM
Levi is all wee-weed up. Another useful idiot for the left. Pretty soon he will be the MoveOn rep for Alaska. God forbid they ever let him loose in the lower 48 where we would have to hide the sheep and goats.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | September 03, 2009 at 09:35 AM
"Rep. Charles Rangel, the powerful chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee and a chief health-care negotiator, said that "bias" and "prejudice" toward Obama are fueling opposition to health-care reform. "
Should not that be "bias against"?
Posted by: PeterUK | September 03, 2009 at 09:38 AM
Sheehan, was wrong, but sincere, Levi's is cynical and stupid, claiming she doesn't cook (Greta, Esquire)doesn't hunt, hello,
was covering up the pregnancy, even MSNBC
and Gail Collins, have turned askance at these claims. Don't bring it up today of all days.
Posted by: bishop | September 03, 2009 at 09:38 AM
Should not that be "bias against"?
Using words correctly, paying his entire taxes on time; you're really asking a lot of Chollie, PUK!!
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 03, 2009 at 09:43 AM
Wasn't Charlie the one who said, that 'tax cuts' was some kind of code, for the Klan,
or something equally inane.
Posted by: bishop | September 03, 2009 at 09:58 AM
Rangle afficcionados will want to click the link to the NY Post story itself.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 03, 2009 at 10:00 AM
The BHO speech next week to JSC will boost attendence to the 09/12/09 rally next Saturday
Posted by: BB Key | September 03, 2009 at 10:06 AM
So, is MSNBC trying to get it's viewership to zero then? Why would you give this kind of exposure to a kid just out of high school? They've been known to, uhmmm, embellish?
Posted by: Pofarmer | September 03, 2009 at 10:06 AM
Talking about Ted's memoirs; is it difficult to write a memoir while your brain is being eaten alive?
Hard to write it, not hard to provide the material. My GF who had it would get detached in time and remember amazingly detailed things.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | September 03, 2009 at 10:07 AM
Harlem Congressman Gave Campaign Contributions To 3 Dems On Ethics Committee Charged With Investigating Him
Seems Charlie Rangel bought off the D-s on the ethics committee.
There may be a reason for Rangel's arrogance. CBS 2 HD has discovered that since ethics probes began last year the 79-year-old congressman has given campaign donations to 119 members of Congress, including three of the five Democrats on the House Ethics Committee who are charged with investigating him.
Posted by: Neo | September 03, 2009 at 10:19 AM
CH,
But should not the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee know which way he is going?
Posted by: PeterUK | September 03, 2009 at 10:19 AM
Well obfuscation was the name of the game, with Ted, from Harvard to Chappaquidick to Andropov, we can't blame that on a tumor,
It's a horrible way to go,
Yes, Po, they are working to be 'ever more selective' in their audience I think a good chunk of it, are conservatives who try to find the craziest thing they've said.
Posted by: bishop | September 03, 2009 at 10:19 AM
Why would you give this kind of exposure to a kid just out of high school?
I think as Johnson is shown to be an obvious lowlife, the question arises about why the Palins didn't send him packing from the gitgo, why they weren't close enough to their daughter to affect her relationship with him pre-baby, whether Palin was too busy to watch over her children carefully, etc., etc.. Maybe the questions are unfair, but I bet more non-libs than we know wonder about such things. I do.
Posted by: DebinNC | September 03, 2009 at 10:22 AM
why they weren't close enough to their daughter to affect her relationship with him pre-baby
Sorry Deb but this is a non-starter; do you think I approved of every guy my daughters went out with? I liked most of 'em but there were a few that just thought wtf.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 03, 2009 at 10:33 AM
"why they weren't close enough to their daughter to affect her relationship with him pre-baby"
Don't know about the Palins but do come from a huntin' fishin' outdoorsy far North family. The kind of "oversight" you suggest would have seemed out of place.
Posted by: boris | September 03, 2009 at 10:34 AM
--Talking about Ted's memoirs; is it difficult to write a memoir while your brain is being eaten alive?--
The only thing that would have made it difficult for him to write his memoir would have been a good memory coupled with an active conscience.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 03, 2009 at 10:34 AM
Speaking of funny .. or not funny.
The last quarter of “District 9″ isn’t too bad, but the first half is like watching “Borat on the set of ‘V’”.
Posted by: Neo | September 03, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Another funny little thing that Instapundit linked to:
http://baseballcrank.com/archives2/2009/09/politics_when_d.php>When Does School Start? The President Doesn't Know
Just imagine what the press would have said if the previous president had made this kind of mistake.
Posted by: Ranger | September 03, 2009 at 10:39 AM
PeterUK,
Thanks for bringing up the Ways and Means Committee and its Chairman. You know, the Ways and Means Committee hasn't been the same since Wilbur Mills was Chairman. I'll bet Clarice has a thousand stories. When I was first in DC, I was working down in Southern Maryland but had tons of friends who worked on the Hill and we would party like it was no tomorrow. Especially FETIS Club and Dewey Beach on weekends. He was so popular that I remember Dewey Beach being swarmed with Hillies wearing Wilbur Mills for President T's. Want to know why? LUN
What is it about the water in Arkansas anyway?
Posted by: Jack is Back! | September 03, 2009 at 10:44 AM
Speaking of unintentional funny, this exchange between "Dum and Dumber" Bartlett
and Frum, at the erroneously named New Majority, is all sorts of 'epic fail'
Posted by: bishop | September 03, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Speaking of unintentional humor, re Bartlett
and Frum, at the ironically named 'new majority, epic fail, in the LUN
Posted by: bishop | September 03, 2009 at 10:49 AM
Deb, as I recall, when the Bristol and Levi thing was first being talked about the fuss was over how the Palins sent her to a different high school and otherwise tried to separate them.
I just remember my sister having a boyfriend my Dad didn't like; they probably dated an extra year just because Dad was trying to break them up.
Yeah, she probably doesn't spend as much time with her kids as she could if she weren't politically active. So, is having kids a disqualifier for all female pols, or just Republicans?
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | September 03, 2009 at 10:51 AM
Bishop,
Even the so-called "inside the beltway conservatives and righties" don't understand the America beyond their narrow vision (DC).
Posted by: Jack is Back! | September 03, 2009 at 10:52 AM
Those are assine questions. As the mother of a daughter who consistently found lost boys who she somehow believed just needed to experience how a real family worked and could thus fix them, I can only feel sorry for what the Palins have gone through because of poor judgment from a teenager. If you think a teenager can't figure out how to get around the house rules, including who is acceptable dating material then you've obviously not had a difficult teenager.
Posted by: Grace O'Malley | September 03, 2009 at 10:53 AM
DebinNC, for a good part of my teen years, my mother was taking care of sick relatives in New York City (we lived in Rhode Island) and my father was working seven days a week (he was a factory worker, and there was a lot of overtime). For a good portion of that time, I was taking care of my pre-teen sister while going to college (I commuted) and working jobs. I never thought that my parents were anything other than great parents. This notion that parents have to be there all the time for their precious ones is a recent phenomenon, I believe.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | September 03, 2009 at 11:00 AM
So, is having kids a disqualifier for all female pols, or just Republicans?
That's the kind of comment that made me hesitate expressing my opinion.
Posted by: DebinNC | September 03, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Neo, I actually really liked District 9 and thought the Arriflex documentary first part was really sort of amazing. (Actually, from a technical point of view the whole movie is amazing: it's not structured like a normal H'wood movie, as it either has no first act at all, or the first act lasts for 40 minutes; we get to watch a rather annoying bad guy main character grow; it has a very sympathetic and understated ending; and they did the whole thing including a bunch of CGI aliens for only 30 million freaking dollars.)
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | September 03, 2009 at 11:09 AM
That's the kind of comment that made me hesitate expressing my opinion.
Well, I don't mean to keep you from expressing your opinion, but it's a serious question: yeah, pretty much any mom who does something other than mom-ing could spend more time with her kids. Why is it an issue for Palin? Chelsea Clinton was eleven when her dad was inaugurated, and her mom had had a very successful career as an absent-minded lawyer and commodities trader even before becoming First Lady.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | September 03, 2009 at 11:13 AM
--That's the kind of comment that made me hesitate expressing my opinion.
Naw. Express it. It's cathartic, improves the circulation, and drives the other side bonkers. ;-)
Posted by: sbw | September 03, 2009 at 11:15 AM
absent-minded lawyer
As in where could those billing files have run off to?
Posted by: gmax | September 03, 2009 at 11:26 AM
Palin is not from money. She is not a protected minority. She doesn't have a degree from an Ivy. Therefore it is open season. She just is not one of the elite.
Those are the same reasons so many voters identify with her. She is one of us.
Posted by: Mary | September 03, 2009 at 11:26 AM
DebinNC, why hesitate to express your opinion because it is one with which some folks (or even many folks) will disagree? Good faith disagreement among blog friends is half the fun. I have learned a lot when my opinions have been subjected to the JOM microscope!!! :-))
Posted by: Thomas Collins | September 03, 2009 at 11:31 AM
There is certainly that, but the fact that her beliefs, aren't 'fashionable' in the right circles, is the clincher.
Posted by: bishop | September 03, 2009 at 11:47 AM
Michelle during the campaign quite loudly trumpeted how hard it was on her that Obama was a Senator and running for president -- barely keeping her head above water, buying fresh fruit and all that.
How many people said that Barack was selfishly putting his political ambitions ahead of the welfare of his wife and kids?
I mean, I know I did.
But I was putting my political desires ahead of Barack's political ambitions, admittedly, so I'm probably just racist.
Posted by: hit and run | September 03, 2009 at 11:49 AM
DebinNC:
Always feel free to express your opinion here at JOM. I'm just grateful Bristol found out in time what a slug Levi is and always will be. No respect, gratitude or conscience in him. Of course his own mother the jailbird did not present the best example.Levi is enjoying his 15 minutes of fame but then his future- looking pretty dismal as a high school drop-out. My money's on Bristol.
Posted by: maryrose | September 03, 2009 at 11:58 AM
I get this feeling that 100 years from now, some voodoo practitioner in an inner city somewhere is going to invoke George Bush as the boogieman...
oh, I'm sorry, it's already happening....
Posted by: matt | September 03, 2009 at 11:59 AM
WaPo calls for Rangel to step down ...
Posted by: Neo | September 03, 2009 at 12:07 PM
DebinNC,
As a mom, I've sometimes wondered how Sarah manages. But I also know I don't have a tenth of her energy and strength. Many kids have grown up in households where the parents were engaged in enormous, important tasks, either by their own choice or because of external circumstances. It doesn't always work out perfectly, and can be hard on the children at times, but if having young children automatically made one ineligible for such work, we as a country and a society would lose so much. Providing a great example for your kids is equally as important as time spent with them, imo.
The Palins strike me as a very close and hardworking family. The nasty gossip about them usually comes from people with enormous axes to grind (such as Levi or Nicolle Wallace) and I think that's telling.
Posted by: Porchlight | September 03, 2009 at 12:16 PM
Even the so-called "inside the beltway conservatives and righties" don't understand the America beyond their narrow vision (DC).
I wrestled with an explanation for Frum for a while and it finally came with a posting that described the Bush 43 Presidency as a "moderate" Presidency.
Frum being cut from that cloth seems to think that the age of converativism is dead, and "moderates" are the wave of the future. Additionally, being a "moderate" gets him gigs on CNN, where anybody, that can claim to be the slightest bit "conservative" who will talk like a liberal, is always welcome ("Excitable Andy" does much the same thing).
Frankly, anybody who lives in or near DC knows, that if you talk too much like a "conservative," you just won't be invited to the "better" parties.
Posted by: Neo | September 03, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Deb, as I recall, when the Bristol and Levi thing was first being talked about the fuss was over how the Palins sent her to a different high school and otherwise tried to separate them.
Geesh, I don't recall that at all. I must be slipping. It is interesting how the memes change at the convenience of the MSM(and the Dems) though.
Posted by: Pofarmer | September 03, 2009 at 12:31 PM
There was a degree of derangement from the start, we've seen the source of some it with the likes of Jesse Griffin, who really
should stop throwing stones, in the greenhouse.
Posted by: bishop | September 03, 2009 at 12:44 PM
Sorry to have kicked over a hornet's nest, but since y'all are still responding I'll offer a clarification. My question was whether Palin, given HER particular circumstances...pregnant teen, infant with ds, two other children at home, and a husband whose job takes him away from home, was wise to run for national office in this season of her life. I don't think so. I don't have a general opinion about working moms, because each case is different. Here's a People's article from June giving a glimpse of life in the Palin household.
Posted by: DebinNC | September 03, 2009 at 12:51 PM
This is just too funny not to be missed ...
How long before SouthPark calls a SMUG-ALERT ?
Posted by: Neo | September 03, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Deb, you would have made an excellent friend of Job, sitting and condemning his behavior as the cause of all his troubles.
Posted by: Grace O'Malley | September 03, 2009 at 01:26 PM
Give me a break.
How does,
--My question was whether Palin, given HER particular circumstances...pregnant teen, infant with ds, two other children at home, and a husband whose job takes him away from home, was wise to run for national office in this season of her life.--
lead to
--Deb, you would have made an excellent friend of Job, sitting and condemning his behavior as the cause of all his troubles.-- ?
Deb's question is a perfectly legitimate one that many conservatives, and a few liberals, have asked before, concerning women in the work force. One may or may not agree, depending on your viewpoint, but what's the prob with asking the question?
Do we go from the OT to the NT next, and call her Judas?
Posted by: Ignatz | September 03, 2009 at 01:37 PM
Thanks, Ignatz. I hope no one else feels moved to defend me though. I already feel rather trollish for inadvertantly hijacking the thread.
Posted by: DebinNC | September 03, 2009 at 01:48 PM
Don't feel trollish, DebinNC. The manner in which we JOMers disagree with each other while affirming our friendship is an unspoken part of every thread.
But if you would prefer to move to a different aspect of this, let's move to Levi Johnston. I think he is about as unmanly as a man can get. Knocks up his girlfriend and, instead of keeping his mouth shut and working his butt off to help out the lady he impregnated and raise his child, he wimps out and trashes the Palins. What a creep. In a different day and age, Todd Palin and some of his buddies would have shown up at Levi's place to give Levi some advice on how a man conducts himself in this situation.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | September 03, 2009 at 02:54 PM
I already feel rather trollish for inadvertantly hijacking the thread
Why? I do it all the time.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 03, 2009 at 03:13 PM
Deb, many of our married friends are dual, highpowered career people who have wonderful families like mine, a full time mom.
Their choices worked as well for thier families as the choices mr. bad and I made for ours.
Posted by: bad s##t | September 03, 2009 at 03:34 PM
TC,
What do you think Levi should pay in child support? 20-25% of his gross from whoring would be my guess but I'm not up on Alaskan family law.
Has there been any indication that he is not a run of the mill deadbeat dad? Go get him, Bristol - use trble hooks and a flensing knife on him.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | September 03, 2009 at 04:07 PM
"My question was whether Palin, given HER particular circumstances..."
She was already governor of Alaska, and apparently politically effective before being trashed. Had she become vice president one expects her responsibilities might have been less than as governor. So ...
How much of your concern is actually based on the trashing her family has endured in the process? My question, should she have "known better"?
Posted by: boris | September 03, 2009 at 04:42 PM
My question was whether Palin, given HER particular circumstances...pregnant teen, infant with ds, two other children at home, and a husband whose job takes him away from home, was wise to run for national office in this season of her life.
I see the issue has already been taken to task a little.
BUT.
She was asked to run for Vice President of the U.S.A.
I think you make allowances for that kind of thing. People make adjustments and sacrifices for much less. I simply don't see it as an issue.
Posted by: Pofarmer | September 03, 2009 at 06:50 PM
Pofarmer,
">http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/state_fair/story/919329.html"> Mine's bigger than your's!
Posted by: daddy | September 03, 2009 at 07:08 PM
Po,
Breaking news at noon says at our State Fair we've now got ">http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/state_fair/story/920747.html"> a Cabbage topping out at 129 pounds (World Record) 2 Rutabaga's topping 80 pounds (World Record) and at least 2 500 pound Pumpkins on the way to the scales.
No word on Arugula.
Posted by: daddy | September 03, 2009 at 07:15 PM
Daddy,
You guys are pikers. Our Neighbor's kid grew a pumpkin a pound short of 600 (see Warren). Dad has grown one over 700 pounds.
Posted by: DrJ | September 03, 2009 at 07:36 PM
Yeah,Dr J but the cabbage et al are from ALASKA!
Posted by: clarice | September 03, 2009 at 09:03 PM
You guys in Alaska get to cheat because of Day length. Weird, I know.
Posted by: Pofarmer | September 03, 2009 at 09:52 PM
This is what an Extreme Pumpkin looks like!
Posted by: JM Hanes | September 03, 2009 at 10:37 PM
Oh, NO!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: clarice | September 03, 2009 at 10:51 PM
but the cabbage et al are from ALASKA!
I see. Affirmative action based on geographic location. Got it!
:)
Posted by: DrJ | September 03, 2009 at 11:15 PM
Smart ass,Dr J!!
Posted by: clarice | September 03, 2009 at 11:24 PM
Always, Clarice!
Posted by: DrJ | September 03, 2009 at 11:30 PM
Deb,
As I understand it, Sarah was not initially interested in running for Governor. She' was angry at Governor Murkowski after he had appointed her to a corruption commission, and when she uncovered corruption he essentially blew her off. That prompted her to begin a run for Lieutenant Governor, at which point her evident popularity and kabbitzing of friends, acquaintances even Talk Show Host Dan Fagan, pushed her to run for Governor. I may be wrong, but that is definitely how I remember it. I used to enjoy listening to Sarah during the early campaign season years back when they were friends, and when Dan's co-host, Sharon Leighow(?) was in the process of becoming Sarah's Media spokesperson. When he's not relentlessly bashing her nowadays for not being Conservative enough, Fagan will frequently relate how Sarah was stunned at the popularity she engendered from his audience and average folks across the State. So I think partly at least, she wound up getting thrust into the position of Candidate for Governor by unfolding circumstances that she hadn't planned on. That's how I remember it.
Posted by: daddy | September 04, 2009 at 12:45 AM
So your's is bigger Dr J., I'll grant you But the question is, is the Californian Pumpkin Patch it came from as ">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7mRSI8yWwg"> Sincere as our Alaskan one?
Posted by: daddy | September 04, 2009 at 01:01 AM
I will definitely have pumpkins eating fingers this year at our Halloween Party!
Posted by: Ann | September 04, 2009 at 01:11 AM
Can't wait for your Halloween party, Ann!
Posted by: caro | September 04, 2009 at 11:29 AM